I thought that the best option to do that in my Cisco 861 router, IOS v. 15.0 is to used NVI (Nat Virtual Interface)[url]...
I tried the solution given in this page, but is does not work.
I give you the running-config for my router before and after the modifications proposed in this page
[code]....
I am testing limit bandwith using my ASA 8.2, i am trying to limit internet access for certains users , i order to save Bandwith for the important things but i can´t get any limitation
My configuration is the following, the acces list is just for my pc in order to test, and the service policy is applied to outside interface (called internet in my case) for incoming traffic
access-list Internet_mpc_1 extended permit ip host 172.16.127.70 any class-map Internet-class-TEST match access-list Internet_mpc_1 policy-map Internet-policy-web class Internet-class-TEST police output 1024000 1500
service-policy Internet-policy-web interface Internet
With show service policy i can´t see any activity on the policy , but if i do a similar configuration for inside interface outgoing traffic i can see packets allowed and dropped
I have an ASA 5520 with the below config
Gi0/0: outside (Internet)
Gi0/1: inside (Internal users)
Gi0/2: DMZ (web servers, ftp, Mail etc..)
I have a SMTP relay deployed on the DMZ for mailing. I have also a mail servers installed in the internal lan,
I want to allow trafic from dmz to reach internal lan, and i want normally also allow stmp relay from dmz to reach Internet.
How can i block trafic from DMZ to reach Internal Lan (instead of smtp) if the to allow trafic from dmz to internet i must put ANY in the policy?
For allowing trafic from DMZ to reach Internet, the policy must be DMZ -----> ANY ----->Services., this policy means DMZ can implicity reach Internal Lan?
I wanted to configure failover internet between two routers Cisco 3800 Series. Each router is connected to an ISP. I have configured HSRP protocol on my interfaces and my HSRP configuration works well. I want to configure my routers to switch my internet traffic in case of failure. For example,if the first ISP internet connection fails, traffic will switch at the second ISP. I want to know how I should proceed to do this.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a problem with my new Galaxy S2 and getting Internet connection trough my Linksys-router. I can connect to the router and my S2 shows and says my WIFI-connection is OK. But still I can't get any Internet-traffic to my S2.The wireless router is working OK for my old IPhone and MacBook Pro, but not for my S2. I have tried the S2 on other wireless access points, and it is working fine.I have tried a lot of different wireless settings, but nothing seems to fix the problem.From my S2 I can ping the IP-addresses of the router, all DNS, gateway and IP-address of the router. I can also ping the phones IP-address from my router. But I can't ping anything "outside" the router.Here are some data:
Router: WRT54G
Hardware-version: 2.2
Firmware Version: v4.21.4
I just got optical fiber installed in my place which gives me great download speeds. Now my ISP has a monthly download limit of 120GB, after that I gotta pay overages.Now my setup is like this: Fiber modem (1 port) -> Linksys E3000 router (4 ports + wifi).All my gear is hooked up to the Linksys router (xbox, ps3, media center, office pc & 2 laptops).I would like to keep track of the total "internet" bandwidth use of all devices, but exclude the normal network traffic, as that of course I don't pay for.Is there something that I can install on the Linksys router that can keep track of that kinda of information? router (4 ports + wifi).
View 6 Replies View RelatedIn our USA office we have a RV042 router and in Venezuela we have a RV082 router. We have connected a VPN tunnel (gateway-to-gateway) between both offices.
The point is: How could we redirect the internet traffic from our Venezuela office (RV082) to the USA Office (RV042) to navigate using USA public IP's?
The reason for this is that we need to use online streaming services which are only available for IP's from USA and we can't use them from the Venezuelan IP's.
We can not use the PPTP option since the equipment which will use the streaming services (like hulu, crackle, etc.) in Venezuela is a Google TV device which doesn't allow the configuration of proxy navegation or PPTP VPN connections itself. That's the reason why we need to do that through the routers.
I have configured my e4200 to block traffic at certian times uses both the Parental Controls and the Intenet Access Polices. Neither one seems to work though. [code] I have the same MAC addresses specified in each rule. Initally I had only the first two rules. Those didn't work, so I added rule 3 and 4 (they do the same thing as rules 1 and 2 but from the opposite direction). There are no compliaints, but they don't stop any traffic.
I started with the Parental Controls, they didn't work either. The page in there that lets you pick which machines you want to block seemed next to worthless. I have about four rows listed as "Network Device." REALLY LAME! As the MAC addresses are accesible and these weren't working I went to the IAP.
we have two offices connected with a lan-to-lan ipsec tunnel. My question is about one of the sites.
At the site a Cisco 870-series router is used for connection to the internet and setting up the tunnel. Two subnets exist, 172.22.x.x and 10.30.x.x.
The router itself has an address in the 172.22.x.x-range. Traffic from the 10.30.x.x subnet needs to be able to reach:
- A host in our network over at the other office (also 172.22.x.x but other range). NATting is needed otherwise it won't traverse the tunnel because the lan-to-lan has only 172.22.x.x in its properties. - The internet. NATting is also needed otherwise it won't be routable on the internet. The packets need to go out of the router directly, not through the tunnel.
How do I accomplish this?
Here is a snippet from the config:
interface ATM0.1 point-to-point
ip address <public ip address>
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly
pvc 8/35
class-vc Office(code)
I'm trying to allow SSH traffic from the Internet to my DMZ. I gave my remote guy my ip and he can see the ASA 5505 but not get into the DMZ. The outside is 70.165.19.137. The DMZ server is 192.168.60.2. I have the inside talking to the DMZ fine. [code]
View 9 Replies View RelatedIs there a tool which can analyse the incoming and outgoing traffic on a computer hooked to the internet via a router.I would want to know the name of the program or application generating the outgoing traffic or receiving the incoming traffic and if possible the source of incoming traffic.I can read my Dir-628 router's log but all you really see are IP addresses.
View 2 Replies View RelatedISP has recently announced that they are going to start charging $1 for every GB that their customers go over their monthly limit. i have a 100GB/mo package and i figure that's sufficient for my habits which consist of approx 40GB of torrents, a bit of skyping, bit of browsing, etc. my ISP makes usage graphs available online, when i checked earlier last month to confirm i'm staying under my 100GB limit the graphs said over the past 12 months the highest i topped was 90GB, usually in the 70's. pretty much what i expected. but when i check their usage graphs again recently it says i've been using over 400GB for the past 3 months straight (as far back as the new graphs go). i call BS and find it very suspicious that my internet usage magically quadruples the same time my ISP wants to start charging for overusage, especially retro-active.
anyhoo, i want to somehow monitor my internet traffic usage independently but i'm not sure the best way to go about it.my home network is the typical modem -> router -> LAN.my router is a new netgear wndr3700, it has a traffic meter built in, but considering it's only forms of notification is cutting the internet off altogether or changing a green blinking LED to and orange blinking LED when the defined limit is reached, it's kinda useless. i just got it a couple months ago too, so buying a new router with better traffic monitoring isn't an option.i could put a net meter on each and every computer i have, then sum up their usage stats, but that would be a pain in the ass and wouldn't take my PS3 or WDTV media player into account, as little as they're used online.my prefered solution is to use an old laptop i hardly touch anymore and set it up as a gateway and share the internet connection or make it a proxy server. that way i could set up a net meter on just the one NIC on that to track my internet usage. modem -> laptop -> router -> LAN. the problem i have hear is forwarding ports from one NIC to the other so they can then get ditributed by the router, never tried this before, not sure how to go about it. right now it has XP home, but i can put 7 on it if that's better to work with.
I have 2 computers in 2 different countries. The current country of residence (France) has some Internet restrictions that I want to bypass, so I need to pass all my Internet traffic to my home computer.The home computer is on Windows XP and the connecting computer is on Windows 7 (I also have a Windows XP laptop so that's not a restriction).
I created a vlan (or vpn?) using Hamachi, to have a static IP on the home computer. So now I have a connection to my home computer. The next step would be to direct all trafic through this connection. How do I do that? I tried using the windows wizards: on the home computer (server) I created a new incoming connections thingy and on the client computer I created a VPN connection using the hamachi IP. I finally succeeded connecting the two, but nothing happens. Once I connect to the VPN, I lose Internet connection, and with it the Hamachi connection. I don't think the server passes along the client's internet...
I am in trouble with my cisco 1841 configuration.The "what I want to" schema: very external IP ( AAA.AAA.AAA.AAA ) in the internet cloud => | cisco 1841 external IP BBB.BBB.BBB.BBB | => internal computer IP CCC.CCC.CCC.CCC
View 1 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to block internet traffic on the PC using ASA5501 firewall which is used in transperent mode.The DHCP pc is working fine we just need to pass through ASA to block the internet on the pc however intranet should be available.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a customer which has a main location office and a remote one. Recently we interconnect their facilities using a local ISP service called Virtual Connectivity, which basically is a private network which can be accessed over aDSL or any other data circuit. They are using Cisco 888 routers to interconnect both sites.At the main site the customer also has an Internet circuit (with a Cisco 857 router)and he wants to remove the Internet circtuit from the remote site and provide them access over their main location Internet circuit.At the primary offices, we installed Cisco 2811 router as a gateway to route the Internet and remote network traffic over the required data circuit. Everything is working fine, but we can not access Internet from the remote location over the circuit installed a the main site. I understand this is a routing issue, since the traffic hits the main office network it does not knows how to reach the Internet. I am assuming this routing must be set into the main office Cisco 888 router (installed by the ISP to interconnect to their private cloud) in order to properly route it over the Internet circuit.Since I already have access over the Internet router and the gateway router at the main site, but not into the ISP router, is there any other way I can make this configurtion over the routers I already have access?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am in trouble with my cisco 1841 configuration. The "what I want to schema":very external IP ( AAA.AAA.AAA.AAA ) in the internet cloud => | cisco 1841 external IP BBB.BBB.BBB.BBB | => internal computer IP CCC.CCC.CCC.CCC
Steps (this what I think should be done):
1. Find all packets from A by acl
2. Route finded packets throught cisco1841 directly to internal ip address
It should be easy but it doesn't.
I am working for a company based in Sydney Australia, the company recently open an office in London UK, therefore we are going to get leased lined based on MPLS.We were advised that Customer Edge router will be CISCO1941/K9. We want to our UK client to access our web-based applications via MPLS network instead of internet. The UK office is using BT Business ADSL with 5 Static IP address (please note the modem IP address is actually dynamic), we are going to get a Cisco 857/K9 router which will be used for the entry for the UK client to access the MPLS network. My question will be how do I configure the Cisco 857 router to allow one of the public ip to access the MPLS network. It appears that there are two options, and I am not sure if this is going to work or which one is working better. I have attached two diagrams for clarification of my case.
Option 1 Cisco WAN interface get Dynamic IP (PPPoA) from BT LAN Interface (4 Port) get the assigned 5 Static IP addresses One of the five IPs (217.xx.xx.169) will be assigned to the FE1 (Cisco 1941), any traffic to 217.xx.xx.169 will be routed to the WAN interface of Cisco 1941 to access Sydney service (located in Sydney LAN, mostly http and https traffic) One of the five IPs to 217.xx.xx.170 will be assigned to the WAN interface of Sonicwall Firewall Router which also serve as Internet Access Gateway for LAN users, All trafiic destined for Sydney LAN will be using FE0 (Cisco 1941) as gateway
Option 2Cisco WAN interface get Dynamic IP (PPPoA) from BT LAN Interface (4 Port) will get 192.168.0.1, Cisco 857 router will be the default gateway for LAN users, using one to many NAT, also one to one NAT, One of the five IPs (217.xx.xx.169) will be forwarded to the FE0 (Cisco 1941), any traffic to 217.xx.xx.169 will be routed to the WAN interface of Cisco 1941 to access Sydney service (located in Sydney LAN, mostly http and https traffic)
I have just set up a Cisco ASA 5510. It basically only contains the settings provided in the startup wizard. It however does not let through traffic from the internal interface to wan 2 (wan 1 is not connected yet but traffic should also be able to go there).
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have been at this for the past few hours now. I just cannot get this device to pass through traffic to the internet. Here is the basic topology:
Default Gateway (ISP): 208.118.125.129/29
IP of outside int (e0/0): 208.118.125.130/29
ip of inside int (e0/1): 10.1.1.1/24
igniteCSGfw(config)# sho run
: Saved
:
ASA Version 8.0(4)
[Code].....
We are using an ASA 5510 as our gateway to our ISP. All of our VOIP traffic is sent to an Internet SIP provider for our outbound calls. Our pipe to the Internet is 100Mbps metro ethernet. I am trying to find a way to provide QoS for this traffic so that I can reserve 20Mbps of the available 100Mbps pipe for VOIP traffic.From what I've been able to figure out so far I would use a combination of priority queues and traffic policing. However, it seems that this is nearly impossible to accomplish because I cannot control the remote device that my ASA connects to because it is the ISP device. I could police traffic on the inside interface of the ASA. However, lets say that a client on our network starts downloading from an Internet host and the downloaded traffic saturates my Internet connection. I could police this incoming (from the Internet) traffic on my outside interface of the firewall. This would drop the packets but the bandwidth would have already been used by the time it reaches my firewall.Would the fact that I'm policing incoming traffic on my outside interface cause the sender to throttle down their transmit rate because packets are being dropped? Would this achieve my goal of guaranteeing available bandwidth for my VOIP traffic by not allowing other traffic to saturate the link?Most documents I find regarding this topic describe providing QoS for VOIP traffic traversing a VPN connection in which case you could configure both end devices.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have Cisco ASA 5510 256RAM running 8.2.4 with CSC 6.3.1172.4, it slows down internet traffics drastically when we do speed test, we get something like this, It the computer is bypassing the CSC, it gets This was done when there's very low traffic on the LAN and CPU is low usage on the CSC. The CSC has been re-imaged also but still doesn't solve the problem.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI am trying to make a basic config on my 5520. The first goal is to make trafic from inside to outside.The internet address is 64.28.29.200 and the default internet gw is 64.28.20.193What am I missing since I can not get trafic from inside to the internet? [code]
View 10 Replies View Related[OK] Site to Site IPSec + GRE = success, no problems.
[OK] IPSec remote access = success, no problems.
[NO] SSL VPN = remote users can successfully connect to all internal systems. Cannot pass traffic to the Internet.
Hardware:
Cisco 2811, Cisco IOS Software, 2800 Software (C2800NM-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.4(22)T5, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3) . Software: Cisco Any Connect Secure Mobility Version 3.1.01065
Single hub router terminating IPSec+GRE site to site, IPSec remote access, and SSLVPN remote access VPN services. All services currently configured and running successfully with the exception of the SSLVPN service. Remote users can initiate and successfully establish SSL VPN sessions. While established, connectivity to all internal systems/resources are successful. Only when the remote access client tries to connect to "Outside" Internet resources does traffic not pass successfully. Troubleshooting has pointed to a NAT related issue (I believe).
When connecting from a remote access workstation, utilizing IPSec remote access client (built-in Cisco IPSec client from Mac OS), the session establishes and the client works flawlessly. Examining the Cisco 2811 router, you see the /32 host route from the remote access session get installed, and you see the corresponding NAT translation entries created when the client accesses outside (Internet) resources. Appropriate configuration to implement "hair pinning" have been included to handle the in and right back out (with NAT translation) needed for remote clients to access the Internet.
Configured the 2811 for SSL VPN, and remote access clients can successfully connect and access all internal network resources. Examining the Cisco 2811, the /32 host route for the remote access client is installed, pointing to SSLVPN-VIF0 interface with a next hop of 0.0.0.0 When checking the NAT translation table, there are NO entries for the remote access client address created which leads me to believe the hair pinning/NAT function is not being invoked for SSLVPN clients.
Originally, the IPSec remote access VPN local pool was 10.0.100.0 /24. To keep from having to adjust the existing NAT translation, PBR Route-MAP for the hair pinning function - I took the 10.0.100./24 and broke it into a pair of /25 networks. Bottom half for the IPSec remote access VPN pool (10.0.100.0 /25); upper half for the SSL VPN pool (10.0.100.128 /25). By utilizing SSL VPN, is the traffic somehow bypassing the DIALER1 interface where both the crypto map (and more importantly: IP NAT OUTSIDE, and PBR configuration for the hair pinning function)? I cant explain why NAT translation entries are not being created for SSLVPN client sessions.
Cisco 2811 Configuration has been included. IPSec & SSL VPN Remote Access Sessions Captures (performed from same remote client) have been included.
I need to route to sub nets form 2 different ASA interfaces. The ASA also has an outside interface works like gateway for internet access. Here is my configuration:
ASA Version 8.2(1)
host name ICE3
names
interface Ethernet0/0
name if outside
security-level 0
ip address 201.199.xxx.xx 255.255.255.248
[Code]....
I have little knowledge about computers and any thing IT related. I use os: xp (sp3), AV: Bit Defender, Malwarebyte. Constant dowload traffic @120-130 kbps even when internet is not in use, os updates turned off.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a computer on my network I would like to use for media streaming. I would like to block all incoming/outgoing internet traffic and keep all network traffic on this computer local. Is this even possible? Can I also easily restore it if necessary? The computer is running Windows 7.
View 4 Replies View RelatedMy requirment is to drop the Internet traffic once the Cisco HWIC 3G backup link will become active(attached) .Because I should allow only Business Critical Data allow through that and others should drop. Here are the config I used. In here I used a standard access list to generate intersting traffic which allow all the traffic traverse through the backup link.Can I drop the packets to the proxy (192.168.1.100) using this access list and allow other traffic.access-list 1 deny 192.168.1.100access-list 1 permit anydialer-list 1 protocol ip list 1.Is this the proper way I should follow ? Is there any other good method to achieve my requirement ? [code]
View 1 Replies View RelatedWhat we are trying to accomplish here use two ISP's (one cable and one T1), use the Cable line for site-to-site VPN and use T1 line for all internet traffic. We currently use the following configuration: Cisco 2820 routers terminating the T1 -> HP switch -> Cisco AS 5510 port 0 -> port 1 to LAN switch (Nortel 5510)We want to force all VPN traffic (using 10.0.0.0/24 subnets - 10.0.1.0, 10.0.2.0, etc) through a cable connection, perhaps on port 2 of the ASA, then all non VPN traffic goes to the T1.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have offices in USA and Venezuela.In our USA office we have a RV042 router and in Venezuela we have a RV082 router.We have connected a VPN tunnel (gateway-to-gateway) between both offices.
The point is:How could we redirect the internet traffic from our Venezuela office (RV082) to the USA Office (RV042) to navigate using USA public IP's?
The reason for this is that we need to use online streaming services which are only available for IP's from USA and we can't use them from the Venezuelan IP's.
We can not use the PPTP option since the equipment which will use the streaming services (like hulu, crackle, etc.) in Venezuela is a Google TV device which doesn't allow the configuration of proxy navegation or PPTP VPN connections itself. That's the reason why we need to do that through the routers.
We have a VOIP system from AT&T with T1 internet access. I have a RV042 setup as the default gateway for the network and the router randomly (usually over the weekend loses the internet). I have updated to the latest firmware and have check all logs on the server. When the internet access goes down we can still access the internal network. I have been power-cycling the router and then everything works fine. Is there a known issue with this router radomly blocking internet access in or out? This device should remain working at all times so that our remote users can access the company network.
View 0 Replies View RelatedOn a 2821 Router with 15.1(3)T1
I have an IPSec VPN and NAT configured. Return traffic from an internal NAT host seems to be blocked by the WAN inbound ACL. What is the proper way to allow return traffic from the Internet for this internat NAT host? Note: As a test, removing the deny entry on the WAN ACL allows return traffic.
We are now using a ASA 5510 firewall and we would like to configure a internet load balance traffic in our environment.For example, some IP addresses go through local gateway for internet routing but some address go through VPN tunnel gateway.
View 1 Replies View Related