Cisco Firewall :: 5510 Major Flaw In Identity Firewall?
Nov 21, 2011
I have just configured identity firewall on our ASA 5510.I have 3 nodes that authenticates against Active Directory, using the Windows Server 2008 R2 builtin Network Policy Server: A laptop, a stationary PC, and a Android Phone. All 3 nodes are authenticated using the same user/password.
Now, in ASDM -> Monitoring -> Properties -> Identity -> Users, I can see two of the nodes with my user name attached to it, namely the laptop and the stationary PC.But not the Android phone.
Then it dawned on me. To set up the ADAgent properly, you have to apply 2 group policy entries. Unfortunately, those 2 entries are applied to the Computer Configuraton part of the Group Policy.This means that your COMPUTER has to be a member of your domain for USER IDENTITY to work.So my Android phone and other nodes not a member of the AD Machine Store will never be detected by identity rules, and can roam the network free.
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Mar 9, 2011
I am try to configure ASA 5510 with 8.3 IOS version.My internal users are 192.168.2.0/24 and i configured dynamic PAT and are all internet .
i want configure identity NAT for remote access VPN.Remote users IP pool is 10.10.10.0 to 10.10.10.10
i know to configure NAT exemption in IOS 7.2 version. But here IOS 8.3 version. configure NAT exemption for 192.168.2.0/24 to my remote pool( 10.10.10.0 to 10.10.10.10).
View 6 Replies
View Related
Dec 28, 2011
I have a question with regard to setting up the ID firewall on the ASA 5585 in a single forest, multiple domain windows network.Currently I have a semi-operational IDF at the top level but can't find users on the lower other domains, here is the setup:I have 3 domains.
[URL]
Both domains have a two way parent-child trust and I can look for users in AD Users/Computer on both domains. I initially setup the ASA to look at domain1.test.com using an LDAP aaa-server per the IDF instructions, and then proceeded to configure the ad-agent. I installed the adagent on the domain1.test.com domain controller configured the settings on that system and had no problem adding users to the firewall and getting functionality within domain1. I looked to see if I could see domain 2 and domain 3 users and found none. I went ahead and added the domain2 system to the adagent on the DC and the system says that it is up, but when I search for users is not pulling them from domain2. Instead, it shows domain1 users as domain2user1. I also configured another adserver in the ASA to search ldap on domain 2 to no avail.The cisco documentation states the following:•Before you configure even a single domain controller machine using the adacfg dc create command, ensure that the AD Agent machine is first joined to a domain (for example, domain J) that has a trust relationship with each and every domain (for example, domain D[i]) that it will monitor for user authentications (through the domain controller machines that you will be configuring on the AD Agent machine). Single Forest, Multiple Domains—All the domains in a single forest already have an inherent two-way trust relationship with each other. Thus, the AD Agent must first be joined to one of the domains, J, in this forest, with this domain J not necessarily being identical to any of the domains D[i] corresponding to the domain controller machines. Because of the inherent trust relationship between domain J and each of the domains D[i], there is no need to explicitly configure any trust relationships.Reading that it sounds like it should just work. I had everything properly configured before I installed the adagent, but I'm guessing that there is a chance that you can't have the adagent on the top level DC and get to communicate with the lower level domains.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 26, 2012
We are using the newest release of AD Agent (1.0.0.32.1, built 598). The ASA Firewalls 5520 are having the software release 8.4(3)8 installed.When somebody tries to connect thru the Identity based firewalls from a citrix published desktop environment (PDI) the connection is not possible. Checking the ip-of-user mapping on the firewalls (show user-identity ip-of-user USERNAME) mostly doesn't show the mapping of the USERNAME and the PDI the user is logged in. The user-of-ip mapping of the PDIs IP-address shows mostly other users, which then are used to authenticate the acces thru the firewalls.
What is interesting, that on the AD Agent using "adacfg.exe cache list | find /i "USERNAME"" i can't see the PDIs IP-address neither because it is mapped to another user.Is Citrix Published Desktop environment supported to connect thru Identity based Firewalls? How AD Agent, Domain Controllers and Firewalls are working together? On the firewalls with "show user-identity ad-agent we see, the following:
-Authentication Port: udp/1645
-Accounting Port: udp/1646
-ASA Listening Port: udp/3799
Why Cisco does use 1645 and 1646 and not 1812 and 1813?The Listening Port is used for what purpose? we tried the AD Agent modes full- download and on-demand with the same effect.
View 17 Replies
View Related
Feb 26, 2013
I have some problem with the ASA 5510 ver 7.0(6). My manager wants to keep this as backup. tried lots of things but still users not able to access internet nor can i ping anywhere.For example when i ping 4.2.2.2 i dont get any reply.The runing config is below for ur ref :
HQ-ASA-01# show running-config
: Saved
:
[Code]......
View 9 Replies
View Related
Feb 5, 2012
I need to create a firewalled segment that not only separates hosts from general population, but also from each other. The solitary confinement of firewalled segments.I know that I could create a bunch of sub-interfaces, one for each host or group that needs to be isolated, but I'd really rather not have to do that if possible. 1) It could become a management nightmare between ACLs and sub-interfaces and 2) it's a waste of IP addresses.s there any way that I can create a bunch of separate VLANs behind the firewall and have them all terminate at the firewall, using a single firewall IP address for the gateway?
VLAN 1 - hosts 1.1.1.5 and 1.1.1.6VLAN 2 - hosts 1.1.1.7
Firewall DMZ Interface - 1.1.1.1VLAN 3 - hosts 1.1.1.8 and 1.1.1.9
This way, the hosts are isolated and can't talk to each other unless they're on the same VLAN.I'm working with an ASA 5510 running 8.2.4(4).
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 22, 2011
I have a ASA 5510 firewall with CSC module and Security Plus license for CSC module.Will you tell me how to configure my firewall to send emails to particular mail ID when someone login into the firewall or any virus attacks from outside.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 24, 2012
We were having a discussion of ios firewall vs. asa for smaller clients(less than 50). On using ios firewall(zbf or cbac)and an asa 5505/5510. One of the arguments brought up on using ios firewall on the router is that a router will do an ip sla failover. I have configured a number of isr's for this and i know it works good.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 20, 2012
I would just like to to open UDP port 123 in the ASA 5510 Firewall so that our Primary Domain Controller could use this port to sync time with an external time source. We have already added an access rule for this port under the firewall configuration in ASDM 6.4 and this port was also allowed in the inbound and outbound rule of the PDC's Firewall but it seems that it was still blocked.
View 23 Replies
View Related
Nov 15, 2012
I am quite new to firewall, in my company one asa 5510 firewall is there.I configured inside, outside, dns, dhcp and nating.I need to config bandwidth limit (1Mbps) for inside port and I restruct like facebook, youtube and pornsites..And I heard that some subscription is required, really is it required?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 21, 2013
I have an ASA 5510 in a live environment. Up til a short while ago I could access this via the ASDM and ssh. However I can no longer connect to it via eithier. When I access It via SSH I get a disclaimer saying the following
*** You have entered a restricted zone! Authorized access only!!! Disconnect immediately if you are not authorized user! ***
It then cuts me off.
When I try to access the ASDM I get the following
The firewall is running all its services without a problem and I can ping the device without any issues. Also none of the config (to my knpowledge has been changed). I set up a console session and http server enable is still there with
http 192.168.200.0 255.255.255.0 inside
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 14, 2012
I'm trying to install an ASA 5510 transparent firewall using ASA version 8.4(3)9 but I don't understand how traffic will ever pass through my firewall if both interfaces are on the same sub net(V lan) as the host and it's default gateway? The reason I'm doing this is were installing UAG (or Direct Access) and the UAG appliance need to have public IP's but still be behind a firewall (see attached diagram).
Looking at the documentation (which all seems to be for 5505's running 8.2) it almost seems like i need to have the transparent firewall 'in-line' to the ISP router?, but this router services another IP address range on another v lan for other (routed) firewalls (not shown on diagram) so putting it 'in-line' is not possible. Surely this can't be the case can it? If not how is it supposed to be cabled up and configured so packets go through the firewall?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 20, 2013
I currenty have 2 cisco 5510 firewalls one of the firewals is completly dead but contains a Cisco ASA SSM-10 can i remove this card and just place it into a working unit, will i have any problems doing so.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 29, 2012
I am unable to see 4th interface on my firewall i.e fastether0/3 on my firewall ASA 5510.
Below is the output.
ciscoasa# sh int ip br Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol Ethernet0/0 x.x.x.x YES CONFIG up up Ethernet0/1 x.x.x.x YES CONFIG up up Ethernet0/2 unassigned YES unset administratively down down Internal-Control0/0 127.0.1.1 YES unset up up Internal-Data0/0 unassigned YES unset up up Management0/0 192.168.1.1 YES CONFIG up up
View 8 Replies
View Related
Nov 4, 2012
This is my first time to use the Cisco ASA 5500 family. I have a request from a user to create an access rule, to allow all LAN traffic to Destination IP address 165.241.29.17, 165.241.31.254 with Destination TCP port 5060,5061,5070 and UDP port 50000-52399.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Apr 18, 2012
We have setup new ip camera system and as per our vendor to access the camera from outside we need to open,TCP ports and in firewall and forward to our camera server.
Let say our public ip address is 207.114.111.22 and our local ip address for the camera is 11.11.1.30. We have cisco asa 5510.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 10, 2013
We've in our company a Cisco Asa 5510 v8.4(3), Asdm 6.4(7) and a SSM-CSC-10-K9. The firewall is in transparent mode. I get an exchange 2003 SP2 server behind. When users trying to send mailing lists with many recipients (above 300), the Exchange server didn't send these mails. I'm pretty sure that this problem come from the ASA Firewall, because when I plug my server directly on my Internet Connection, the mailing list is sent. I've search on the web, and disable "ESMTP Inspection", but it didn't work. [code]
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 26, 2012
I have CISCO 5510 firewall running with IOS ASA821-k8.bin.My company has purchased another ASA5510 with IOS ASA843-k8.bin.We need to run both firewalls in Active/Standby mode.
If I upgrade the IOS of old firewall to ASA843-k8.bin the the running configurations does not work properly.It does not pick the network objects and NAT rules as they are configured with OLD IOS and running.
Or if I restore the configurations of old firewall at New ASA the result is worst. Even firewall with new IOS does not show any Access Rule and NAT rule and does not supprt network objects.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 27, 2012
I have setup an Identity Firewall on a ASA version 5.6 on a DMZ interface.I have installed the ADAgent on a domain member Win2008 and configured as follows: [code]
where ashdew is a domain user and ACL 122(only one line) is applied on the dmz interface and NAT is properly configured.The ADagent has been properly tested and ASA can register to it.The ASA can connect to AD DC controller and query user database.I have placed a laptop ip 172.17.h.x on the DMZ and can ping the DMZ interface.
The laptop cannot authenticate on the domain and the asa does not seem to retrieve the user identity.Do I need to add extra rules in the access-list 122 to permit trafic to DC?Can I check on the AD Agent if it can retrieve the user to ip mapping ?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Feb 2, 2012
Firmware is 1.52.0. Model is WRT54GS.I'm configured with WPA2-PSK/AES. Broadcasting my SSID. No MAC access filtering.HTTPS access only to the config pages. Custom (not default) password. Remote management disabled.
Summary:The router simply "forgot" its assigned SSID and reverted to broadcasting as "linksys".It also ceased encrypting its broadcast.I was able to log in and change it back. It retained many of the OTHER settings I had previously configured.
Details:Two days ago, I noticed my client (laptop) could no longer see the usual SSID that I connect to on my home network.However, there was a new SSID in the area, named "linksys", broadcasting UNSECURED.Coincidentally, this new "linksys" access point had the exact same signal strength that my usual access point typically had.So, I connected to it, you know, just to see.I was only able to access the config pages at my custom IP address (not at x.y.0.1), prefixed with the "https://" scheme identifier.And it didn't prompt for a password. Hopefully because it recognized the cookie my browser still carried from the last time I logged in to it. But maybe because it had temporarily dropped ALL of its security measures...It was definitely my router. Just, stripped of its usual encryption/authentication and its usual SSID.So, I switched the SSID back to what it usually is.And I turned the WPA2-PSK/AES encryption back on.The router "remembered" my WPA2 passphrase, which it displayed to me as plaintext when I pulled down the "security mode" dropdown menu and selected "WPA2 Personal".After re-configuring, it works as well as ever.Is this a known security flaw in the WRT45GS? Because....it seems like a fatal one, as far as network security is concerned.Is it limited to one firmware release?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Oct 31, 2012
So I loaded the shiny new ASA 9.0(1) on a test/dev cluster of 5510's with the SecPlus license.In 8.4.4 (or maybe 8.4.3?) new password-policy commands were introduced, which allowed for very granular password policies for local users. This appears to be gone in 9.0.1. Is this by design? These commands met certain compliance regulations. EIGRP is supported in multiple context mode now, however the contexts dont appear to form EIGRP neighborships with each other on a shared interface. I did issue the mac-address auto command in system mode if that matters. All contexts do form EIGRP neighborships with a regular IOS device, however routes are still not propegated from CTX1 to CTX2, 3, etc.It's entirely possible I'm doing something wrong, this is my first stab at multiple contexts, or its possible this doesnt work by design?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 5, 2012
I am using ASA5510 as firewall and vpn is configured. Inside my office i have two networks one with 10.X.X.X and 192.X.X.X . My inside firewall interface configured with 10.X.X.X network.
When I connect from outside using VPN client I can access 10.X.X.X network but other network I can't access.How can I make it.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 11, 2012
Good tutorial video or site for the ASA 5510s?how to get around the GUI; adding rules.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 15, 2011
I am facing some issues on static NAT,after my IOS upgrade from 7.2(3)
I am getting some peculiar error
%ASA-6-302013: Built inbound TCP connection 654734 for dmz:172.19.19.141/27685 (172.19.19.141/27685) to inside:192.168.16.250/3389 (172.19.22.91/3389)
%ASA-6-302014: Teardown TCP connection 654734 for dmz:172.19.19.141/27685 to inside:192.168.16.250/3389 duration 0:00:00 bytes 0 TCP Reset-I
Configuration
static (inside,dmz) 172.19.22.91 192.168.16.250 netmask 255.255.255.255
access-group dmz_in in interface dmz
access-list dmz_in extended permit ip host 172.19.19.141 host 172.19.22.91
I am trying to access a machine in Inside from Dmz
interface Ethernet0/2
nameif dmz
security-level 50
interface Ethernet0/1
nameif inside
security-level 100
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 28, 2012
I've been having an unusual networking issue lately, where everything runs smoothly apart from when one user's laptop is connected to the WLAN. All users on the network get something between 20% and 60% packet loss, only when this user's laptop is connected. I've made sure all the TCP/IP settings are reset to default, I've reset the router to factory settings, but the problem persists. This only came on recently, and I don't believe anything changed.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 8, 2011
I'm working on a large deployment with multiple ASA interfaces with numerous subnets behind eash interface. The subnets are not contigous. The problem we have had in the past is that in order to traverse ASA interfaces with the NAT untouched, we need to create identity NATs everywhere (over 500 statements on a single firewall). Cisco sales suggested we try this command to ovoid this;nat (any,any) after-auto source static any any description Identity NAT But when it is enabled the ASA doesn't perform NAT on any interface, even outbound (we want to apply a global IP outbound with our global pool). I do a show xlate global 67.10.10.10 and no translations show up. After I disable the above command, no nat (any,any) after-auto source static any any description Identity NAT I see entries in the XLATE table. On the outside device (router at 8.8.8.1) I confirm this by doing a show user to see what IP is telneted through the far end.
how to avoid creating these numerous identity NAT statements with 8.3?Here is an example of 8.2 identity NAT for reference.
static (inside,DMZ1) 10.60.2.0 10.60.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0static (inside,DMZ2) 10.60.3.0 10.60.3.0 netmask 255.255.255.0static (inside,DMZ3) 10.60.4.0 10.60.4.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
Here is the snippit of my test lab config running 8.3.
(config)# show run: Saved:ASA Version 8.3(2)!names!interface Ethernet0/0nameif outsidesecurity-level 0ip address 172.16.1.80 255.255.255.0!interface Ethernet0/1nameif insidesecurity-level 100ip address 10.10.80.1 255.255.255.0!interface Ethernet0/3shutdownno nameifno security-levelno ip address!interface Management0/0nameif managementsecurity-level 100ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0management-only!boot system disk0:/asa832-k8.binftp mode passiveclock timezone MST -7clock summer-time PDT recurringdns domain-lookup outsidesame-security-traffic permit inter-interfaceobject network obj_anysubnet 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0access-list ACL_CUST_OUTSIDE extended permit icmp any anypager lines 24logging enablelogging timestamplogging buffered informationallogging trap notificationslogging asdm informationalmtu outside 1500mtu inside 1500mtu management 1500no failovericmp unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1asdm image disk0:/asdm-641.binno asdm history enablearp timeout 14400!object network obj_anynat (inside,outside) dynamic 67.10.10.10nat (any,any) after-auto source static any any description Identity NATaccess-group ACL_CUST_OUTSIDE in interface outsideroute outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.1.1 1route inside 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 10.10.80.2 1
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 8, 2011
We will be upgrading from 4.x to 5.x and need to verify if any needed ports will have to be alllowed through the firewalls. Is there a list of required ports somewhere, I have searched but am coming up empty-handed.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 26, 2011
I have a Cisco ASA 5510 connected to 2 private lans (1 for my HQ pc's{inside} and 1 for the worldwide mpls{outside}) It is also connected to the public internet at interface "public" and my dmz at "dmz" interface. I suspect I have a routing issue because packet-trace yields allow, the nat looks ok and the objects look ok at least to me but I'm the one with the non working config so...Basically this is the desired flow:
1. I need all traffic from the inside to be able to flow to the outside unimpeded as they are both trusted networks. (this is ok right now as I allow everything via access-list 101.)
2. I need any host on the public internet to be able to reach a server on the dmz via the pat which I set up from the "public" interface to the "DMZ" interface. The desired flow would be that the person on the internet types in [URL] and this is directed to the public interface ip which forwards to the webserver object on the dmz. (I cannot get this working any which way)
3. I need the dmz to be able to communicate with another server on the mpls via the "outside" interface when it recieves the request from the public it then checks with this other server on the outside via nat(translating the dmz range into the ip of the outside interface on the firewall)I have a default route that points to the mpls or outside interface for 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 via 10.x.x.1 - (and although I'm not sure I suspect this could be conflicting with traffic that needs to be sent to the "public" interface .... meaning that the firewall should dump packets bound for 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 to the public interface - 184.x.x.194 but I'm very reluctant to change the default route as this is in production and I'm not sure how it will affect traffic).However, I do suspect that if I changed the route from default to static as such:
route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 10.x.x.1 (this would get all lan and mpls traffic to the mpls gateway) route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 184.x.x.193 (this would send everything else from public to the public internet gateway)I think this is accurate but then I would bypassing my corporate internet proxy which is behind the mpls gateway at 10.x.x.1? Is there a way to get http traffic originating from the lan (10.x.x.x) to use the mpls gateway and http traffic for the dmz to use the public internet gateway at 184.x.x.193. I don't want to start causing a flow problem for the internet nor do I want to bypass my corp internet proxy.Either way I cannot get this to work, eventhough the logic checks out, I cannot get even a ping response when I allow icmp any any for testing. Note: I can ping resources on each network from the firewall, not only it's own ports in the associated network but other resources on those networks as well.
Here is the running-config:
ciscoasa# sho run
: Saved
:
ASA Version 8.4(1)
!
hostname ciscoasa
domain-name marcjacobs.lvmh
[code].....
View 16 Replies
View Related
Jun 26, 2012
I have a new ASA 5510 firewall, the objective is to set up a DMZ zone. my problem is I can't access to the web server in the DMZ from outside
DMZ ==========> outside OK
INSIDE ==========> DMZ OK
DMZ ============> Inside OK
OUTSIDE ==========> DMZ NOK "FAIL"
I put in attachment the running-config file.
View 6 Replies
View Related
May 22, 2011
We currently have two ASA 5510 firewalls in two locations. One in each and they don't have a standby pair. Now, I wanted to put them together in one site and replace the other one with ASA5520. Now my question is, I need to know if the ASA5510 hardware are the same type. They are both ASA 5510 but I am wondering why the other firewall is displaying ASA-5510-K8 and the other one is only ASA-5510.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 28, 2013
I'm having a problem with an ASA 5510 and software from Manage Engine (Firewall Analyzer). They are saying that sys log 113019 is not getting data over to the server where the firewall analyzer is installed. I'm checking the config and I see it enabled. Why this particular sys log info isn't making it to the reporting software when other data is.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 30, 2012
Is it possible to upgrade directly from 8.0(4) to 8.2(5) software in 5510. Is there be any workaround in regards to the config.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 11, 2011
I'm having a problem configuring an ASA 5510. A previous employee started the config and left abruptly. He established a VPN Tunnel between two of our sites and that's working without an issue. The problem is, the network behind the 5510 at the remote location cannot access the internet.
ASA Version 8.2(1)
!
hostname PH-Firewall
domain-name pleasehelpme.com
enable password HXrQty4kqW8s8yeE encrypted
passwd ucA.qrYJWD9UyIFz encrypted
names
[code]....
View 12 Replies
View Related