I am trying to configure two ASA-5505 as a failover pair. Software 8.2.5 and ASDM 6.4.5.206 Using the wizard i get to step3 .. then nothing happens. Trying direct in asdm but the only interface i can choose is "--None Unnamed-"
View 1 RepliesI have a Cisco ASA 5505 in our office. We are currently using Interface 0 for outside and 1 for inside. We only have 1 Vlan in our environment. We have two three switches behind the firewall. Today the uplink to Interface 1, to the firewall, on the switch went bad. I want to setup a second inside interface on the firewall and configure it as failover incase this happens again. I want to attach it to the other switch. Can I do this? If so, what do I need to do? would it only be a passive/standby interface?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI need to configure one interface in failover because the client has 2 ISP.[CODE]
View 2 Replies View RelatedI've got a ASA 5550 firewall interface failover issue. (File attached).
when I shut down the inside interface Gi 1/1 of the left firewall(Active firewall), It failed to failover. but when I shut down the Gi 1/12 of the Core 1 switch, The firewall failover very well.
I followed this guide but I was not able to failover. [URL]
how can I configure so that when the Gi 1/1 or Gi 1/0 interface goes down, it can failover ? Code...
I am looking to change my Failover Int IPs on my PIX 515E Bundle, Cisco PIX Firewall Version 6.3(5)123 with the least impact on the network.
For example:
interface ethernet5 "state"
IP address 172.18.0.245, subnet mask 255.255.255.252
ip address state 172.18.0.245 255.255.255.252
failover ip address state 172.18.0.246
I want to change these lines to .....
interface ethernet5 "state"
IP address 172.18.0.185, subnet mask 255.255.255.252
ip address state 172.18.0.185 255.255.255.252
failover ip address state 172.18.0.186
I have two ASA 5540s, ver 8.4 configured in Active/Standby failover.I am also using the redundant interface feature for my Inside interface. Gig0/0 is the active primary and Gig0/1 is standby.
I will activate failover monitoring of the Inside interface using the monitor inside command.
My question concerns the failover monitoring of the redundant interface. If the gig0/0 connection were to fail would the Gig0/1 interface become Active, AND simultaneously result in a full device failover?
Or, does Gig0/1 of the Inside interface redundant pair simply become active and not change the Inside interface device failover state? Thus NOT resulting in a device failover.
From ASA 5520 we tested the interface failover it not working even the interface are getting monitor .
primary is active.
Manually we shut the outside interface of the primary device configuration is getting reflecting in secondary as outside interface shut. Interface failover not happen.
ii All the interface are getting monitor when we gave command sh failover. even though when we shut outside interface failove not happening.
how to do the interface failover in ASA 8.4 version.
I have a ASA 5505 which is connected to a remote site which also has a ASA 5505 over a L2L VPN tunel. One of the sites has a WAN failover configured with two ISP which is working successfully.
But, when the WAN connection fails over to the backup connection the VPN link breaks as the peer site IP address has changed and the VPN can not establish a connection.
Would it be possible to configure a VPN failover so that when the connection failovers so will the VPN tunnel?
There are 2x Cisco ASA 5505 in an active/standby failover config. The primary asa 5505 has been reset and the secondary is now running as active. I would like to reintroduce the primary again but need to know how to do this.
Ideally I would like to remove the failover config and start from scratch. Do I just need to enter the following to disable failover on the active secondary box?
no failover
no failover lan unit secondary
no failover lan interface failover Vlan999
no failover interface ip failover 192.168.254.1 255.255.255.252 standby 192.168.254.2
So we currently have a T1 connection at our location. We were looking to add a high speed cable internet and add an ASA 5505 with Security plus license to do failover between the two. I have found a few examples on how this would work but curious about a couple things.
We would want the Cable to be the primary, T1 as a backup.Currently the IAD that handles our T1 does dhcp, dns, and NAT.. Who/what would handle these items with the setup above?
Do I correctly understand that when two ASA 5510 are in fail over pair, the switchover from primary to secondary if one interface of primary goes down shall happen ONLY if failover link is up? So when the fail over link is down and one interface on primary got down also, interface tests between the two ASAs still are being done , but secondary SHALL NEVER try to become active.
In this case why to make tests on data interfaces ? What is the reason to make them? If the knowledge of that some interfaces of primary became down comes through failover link - no need to make additional interface tests - primary will tell about the failure to secondary. If so should run no monitor-interface if name command to dis load devices and network by foolish tests?
I have a question regarding failover monitoring on the ASA5505 in an active/standby configuration.
I understand that on the 5505 you create VLAN interfaces and then assign the VLANs to the 5505 switchports. With failover configured on the 5505, the VLAN interface names are monitored. For example, VLAN 100 interface named Inside is assigned to ethernet0/1, switchport mode access. When issuing a show failover command the output will show the monitor status of interface Inside..
Does failover monitor the VLAN virtual interface only? Does failover also monitor the link status of the ethernet0/1 switchport?
I am getting this error on my PIX 535 with 8.0.4 code. The error is Error : OSPF/RIP cannot be enabled on failover interface, I am getting this error while trying to enable RIP on the firewall. The context is single mode and failover is enabled. When I am disabling the failover the Firewall is accepting the RIP configurations.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCurrently l have two ASA 5520's in a active/passive failover scenario. Currently the interfaces for the inside and outside are fixed at 100/FULL.I want to repatch them into GigE ports setup as Auto Negotiate.Is there anyway of keeping the connections through the firewall active in this type of scenrio or will l have downtime disconnecting and repatching? or could l possibly disable failover and reconfigure each ?
View 6 Replies View Relatedi have a stack of 3750x, with minimal configuration. there are two vlans, and two vlan interfaces with IP addresses. when i ping out from this switch to another host, it picks vlan1's ip address as the source automatically. i tested this by doing two pings with extended options using each vlan's interface as the source, and got different results. how the switch decided to use the first vlan's ip address as a source.
View 11 Replies View RelatedI have a pair of ASA5510s in a failover configuration where I see these 2 logs repeated every 15 seconds.
105008 1 Nov 27 2012 10:39:27 (Primary) Testing Interface management
105009 1 Nov 27 2012 10:39:28 (Primary) Testing on interface management Passed
I have read other threads where these are accompanied by "105005, Lost Failover communications with mate on interface". But I'm only getting these 2. The other thing that is confusing is that the "management" interface is not the failover interface. So why do I see 105008/9 logs about it?
Output of "sh fail":
5510a# sh fail
Failover On
Failover unit Primary
[Code].....
I have been working with ASA 5510,20,40,80 but not with 5505 this vlan and its interfaces are quite confusing.Just want to know how it works and its connectivity to Cisco Switch.Do i have to put the interface of the switch in the same vlan as i am creating the interface vlan in firewall ?Now the switch port connecting to this Eth1 interface should also be in the same vlan ? i.e vlan3 ?? or it will be in trunk ? The default configuration shows the eth0 with no access vlan and interface eth1 with access vlan 2... does it mean the eth0 is in vlan1 ? (Nativ Vlan ) ???
View 4 Replies View RelatedI want to creat sub int on ASA 5505 but when I am trying below command it show error.
------------------------------------
config t
int f0/0.3400
------------------------------------
My ASA software version is 8.2(5).
Can we make sub interface on Cisco ASA 5505 model and if its possible then do that interface need to be upgraded into Trunk Port.
View 8 Replies View RelatedI setup a site-to-site VPN tunnel at the remote ASA5505. I am able to asdm to the outside interface but not ssh. I switch to telnet and still not allow me to access. I added an ACL to allow telnet any to the outside interface but still not working. In ASDM I see the log Here is the second issue. When I want to change the telnet back to ssh using ASDM I got the following error.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a problem where my outside interface stops passing traffic and the only way to resolve the issue is to reload the ASA, the interface never is down it just stops passing traffic. The inside interface never stops allowing traffic to pass as I can get to all my internal servers and shared drives.
The firmware is:
asa821-k8.bin
Running Config
: Saved:ASA Version 8.2(1) !hostname f1domain-name somedomain.co.ukenable password w1Y.GBKFyC5NqO3M encryptedpasswd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU
[Code].....
I'm using asa 5505 with 8.4(2) and have the following problem.I have 2 Networks. each Network has it's own externel Internet-Ip and also Mail-Server.
[code]
Now I want a communication between the two Mailservers with their external Ip-Address.I did a static NAT from ipnt any to int any or also from int routed to int routed, but nothing worked.Packet tracer showed at NAT-Lookup where the externel adress of the second Mailserver is passed: Info Static translate Network1 to Network1
But it should show a translation from network1 to network1-external.Due to Security reasons, I cannot paste the whole config.Under 8.0 I did the same configuration with Policy-Nat and it worked.
I have setup ASA 5505 with 2 ISP, named outside (primary) and backup, the scenario is if outside down, then backup will take over, it works now. But it is not working when the primary connection cannot reach the gateway with the interface still up.
Is it possible when the primary connection cannot reach the gateway then backup automatically take over?
My configuration is:
ASA Version 8.2(1)
!
hostname cisco
[Code].....
I have a Cisco ASA 5505, the problem is I am not able to ping to outside natted interface (ip: 172.88.188.123 and 124 and 125) from inside network I have looked for ASA documentation through the internet and still got nothing.
the config are:
: Saved
:
ASA Version 8.2(1)
!
[Code].....
I have a new ASA 5505 and all is working fine, I can CLI and ASDM into it, but just can't ping the inside interface, do I need to enable a feature to make this work somehow?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am connecting the inside interface to an upstream switch and therefore will need to assign a static IP address to the inside address as I did below:
#sho int ip brief
Vlan1 123.123.123.123 YES manual up up
I will also use this to manage the ASA. I am having a problem with the network configuration of the inside interface as I can't ping the gateway and/or the in IP of the inside interface.Do I need to add any routes?
I was asked to block pings from the internet to the outside interface of our ASA-5505 firewall. I found a post that said to enter "icmp deny any outside", however that does not do it.
I created an ACL to try and do the trick, also to no avail:
access-list outside_in extended permit icmp any any echo-reply
access-list outside_in in interface outside
access-group outside_in in interface outside
I have an ASA 5505 that I'm trying to set up a guest network on. I've configured an interface as a trunk and allowed the 2 vlans but I'm not getting any layer 3 to it. The switch connected to it is a 3560 and port is configured as a trunk with the same vlans.
I can't ping the ASA inside interface but I see its MAC address in the swtich's table.
[code]....
I enabled snmp config ASA 5505 with Version 7.2(4), the NMS/reporting system can give graphs for CPU & Memory usages. But I can't see any elements about physical interfaces.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI would like to allow users from network 10.132.23.0/24, 10.132.33.0/24, 10.132.24.0/24 access to our SQL server(192.168.1.7) located on the inside interface(192.168.1.0/24 network) Those networks (10.132.0.0/16) come from the DMZ interface.
View 12 Replies View RelatedI have a ASA5508 running in 8.3(2) and without enable NAT. If I do a static network address translation for a inside address. any Implict rule in xlate?In another words, what is the forwarding rule ASA choose while there is routing exist and NAT? Do I need to setup bypassing NAT?
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe have a Cisco ASA 5505 (v7.2(3)) with a "fairly" normal configuration yet we have a problem where it appears UDP/53 traffic is denied on our inside network.
here is output from our sys log:
SyslogID Source IP Dest IP Description
305006 172.18.22.3 portmap translation creation failed for udp src inside:172.18.22.156/42013 dst inside:172.18.22.3/53
To give some clarification:
172.18.22.3 is one of our DNS servers
172.18.22.156 is a device we're experimenting with.
We've bypassed the Cisco by using a 4G wireless router with this same device - and it works flawlessly.Here is a [scrubbed] copy of our config. It is what I inherited from the previous admin - I'm not sure of all its finer points (I'm not Cisco certified -- perhaps I'm just certifiable.)
: Saved
:
ASA Version 7.2(3)
!
hostname [redacted]
[code].....
Trying to add inside routes on an ASA 5505 to point traffic to another gateway for other connected networks is resulting in the following error 6Sep 16200 819:13:5810601510.184.236.1265003810.170.54.1823389Deny TCP (no connection) from 10.184.236.126/50038 to 10.170.54.182/3389 flags RST on interface insideI believe the problem is due to the Asymetric tcp connection and the ASA is dropping the connection because it only see one half of the traffic.Is there a way we can stop the firewall dropping the TCP connections on the inside interface? i've tried removing the threat managment which didnt work.Annoying thing is were putting the ASA 5505's in to replace old Watchguard soho firewalls only the watchguards forwarded the traffic no problem at all.
View 1 Replies View Related