I've set up a standard site-to-site VPN between 2 ASA 5505s and the VPN is working fine for traffic between these ASAs and computers which are in the same LANs.but when I'm trying to connect to computers which are in another VLAN I have a problem.
View 1 RepliesI have site-to-site VPN using two ASAs 5505. I can ping between two computers C1 and C2. Now I want to add subnet 192.168.1.0. How do I configure routes on ASA so that I can ping between computers C3 and C2?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have a problem configuring a Cisco ASA 5505.Our company established a second facility, that should be connected using VPN to our headquarter.I used the ASDM "Site-to-site VPN wizard" to create a connection, which works fine with our main network.
Following structure:
Headquarter:
Cisco ASA 5505, firmware 9.1, ASDM version 7.1
Outside: fixed IP
Inside: IP of the interface is 192.168.0.1/24 (data network)
Now I have a second network 192.168.1.0/24 (VoIP network), PBX address is 192.168.1.10.Both networks should be accessible via VPN.
New Facility:
Cisco ASA 5505, firmware 9.1, ASDM version 7.1
Outside: fixed IP
Inside: IP of the interface is 192.168.2.1/24
I already created a connection, so that a PC from the new facility reaches the data network. E.g. a ping from 192.168.2.100 to 192.168.0.100 is possible.Now, I would like to add some VoIP telephones to the new facility, that can reach the PBX on 192.168.1.10.In the connection, I already added both networks as Remote network:
object-group network Testgroup
network-object 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0
network-object 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
access-list outside_cryptomap extended permit ip object-group Testgroup object Remote-Network
My problem is now, I don't know what to set as "Gateway" on my PBX.I can't use 192.168.0.1 because it is another subnet. Also I can't set a second IP 192.168.1.1 to the interface of the ASA., how I can realize this, so that both subnets are accessible via VPN and all the devices have a gateway set?
I have a ASA 5510 at our corporate HQ that has one site to site VPN. I need to add 6 additional site to site VPN's to this ASA for our remote branches. How can I add them without affecting the existing site to site VPN? The 6 site to site VPN's will all have the same settings however these settings are different from the existing site to site that I already have set up. How can I set it up so the 6 additional VPN's use their own crypto map and all use the same settings?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have Cisco 3560X L3 Switch. We have done Inter VLAN in our internal networks. Below are the VLAN details
Default VLAN1 IP 192.168.125.2 (Gi0/1, Gi0/23, Gi0/24)
Interface Gi0/1 (Port Configure as a Trunk)
Interface VLAN 10 SERVERS_SW (Gi0/2 to 0/6)
IP Address: - 192.168.0.1 255.255.254.0
Interface VLAN 20 USERS_SW (Gi0/7 to 0/18)
IP Address: - 192.168.152.1 255.255.248.0
Interface VLAN 30 SPARE_SERVER_SW (Gi 0/19 to Gi 0/22)
IP Address: - 192.168.8.1 255.255.248.0
We have Sonicwall NSA2400 Firewall and we have setup Site-to-Site between our other offices who has Sonicwall TZ210 firewall. It works fine and they are able to access all the above networks.
Now the problem is we have one more site which uses Vigor Firewall (with Internal Network 192.168.100.0). We have setup the site-to-site vpn between Sonicwall NSA 2400 (Lets say SITE A) and Vigor (Lets say SITE B) but SITE A is unable to ping to SITE B Firewall but SITE B is able to *ONLY* SITE A firewall.
SITE A is trying to ping from User VLANs whose local ip is 192.168.152.0 range.
How to add route to 100.0 so that we will be able to ping and access SITE B networks.
I would like to know both Cisco 2901 or 2921 router and Cisco 5505 ASA can build site to site VPN.
1) what is the different to build site to site VPN between router and firewall ?
2) which is the best choice if using in site to site VPN connection ?
I have a request to establish a site to site VPN with a customer. While collecting the information I give them our local network subnet which is a private subnet (192.168.5.0). They asked me if I could give them a public address instead. They can not work with the 192.168.5 subnet. Is this possible?
My side of the VPN is an ASA 5505 running 8.2(2). The other side i believe is a Checkpoint.
Got an ASA5505 connected to another endpoint running IPsec and being NAT'd at each end to a 10.0.0.0/24 network. I can pass other types of traffic through the ASA 5505 but not RTP traffic. The moment it is NAT'd and hits the firewall rules it gets denied by the default deny at the bottom of the list.
Currently the rules are as follows
Incoming External
allow ip any any
allow tcp any any
allow udp any any
default deny
[code].....
It wont allow us to setup a voip call...however when the same call manager sets up a voip call NOT using this ipsec tunnel it works just fine.
We have a client that has a Cisco 1801W Firewall that is setup as a site to site VPN terminating to a Cisco ASA 5505. The tunnel is up and established, I can ping from both sides of the tunnel.
The problem is the clients behind the Cisco ASA (192.168.2.x) cannot reach certain ports behind the Router (192.168.1.x). The main thing we're trying to do is browse via UNC path (ex: \192.168.1.120 from a 192.168.2.x machine).
I got 3389 working after I changed the - ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.120 3389 y.y.x.x 3389 route-map DM_RMAP_1 extendable Modified the command to include the public IP instead of interface FastEthernet0
I believe it has something to do with the way NAT and route-maps are setup currently but I'm not familar enough with them to make the changes. I worked with Cisco to ensure the VPN tunnel was fine and it's something security related on the Router.
Here is the configuration (removed a few lines not necessary. y.y.x.x = WAN IP of Router x.x.y.y = WAN IP of ASA).
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 23648 bytes
!
version 12.4
no service pad
[Code].....
I have weird problem with a Site to site VPN tunnel from a Cisco ASA 5505 to an Clavister Firewall.When I restart the Cisco ASA 5505 the tunnel is up and down,up, down, down, and I get all strange messages when I see if the tunnel is up or down with the syntax: [code]
After a while like 5-10 min the vpn site to site tunnel is up and here is the strange thing happening I have all accesslists and tunnel accesslists right I can only access one remote network (Main site Clavister Firewall) trought the vpn tunnel behind the Cisco ASA 5505, and I have 5 more remote networks that I want to access but only one remote network is working trought the vpn tunnel behind the Cisco ASA. I see that when I do this syntax in ASA: show crypto ipsec sa.They had a Clavister Firewall before on that site before and now they have a Cisco ASA 5505 and all the rules on the main site thats have the big Clavister Firewall is intact so the problems are in the Cisco ASA 5505. [code]
All these remote networks are at the Main Site Clavister Firewall.
I wanted to know the maximum VPN client sessions (using the Cisco VPN client) and Site-to-Site VPN tunnels that I can connect to my ASA 5505 simultaneously.
In other words, if I have x VPN clients and y Site-to-Site tunnels, at any time, does x + y have to be <= 10 (Total VPN Peers)? If yes, can I upgrade to the security plus license to increase the Total VPN Peers to 25?
Licensed features for this platform:
Maximum Physical Interfaces : 8
VLANs : 3, DMZ Restricted
Inside Hosts : Unlimited
Failover : Disabled
VPN-DES : Enabled
[Code]...
I have a 5505 asa code version 8.3(2). Trying to set up a site to site tunnel with someone and he is asking if I can use ike v2. How do I go about setting up the tunnel to use ikev2? Is ikev2 an option with site to site tunnels?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI am not very experienced with Cisco networking.
Here is the situation.
Site A - headquarters 192.168.1.x
Site B - remote office 192.168.20.x
Site C - remote office 192.168.30.x
Site A - ASA 5510
Site B - ASA 5505
Site C - ASA 5505
Site-to-site VPN is established and works between A and B, A and C. Users would like to establish a tunnel between B and C to work on a common project and the data is on Site B.
I tried configuring the S2S VPN with pre-shared keys on both firewalls at sites B and C but in the end it is not established (I cannot ping either side). I used the Wizard interface multiple times and one time the CLI. I generally followed the settings chosen between the headquarter and the individual remote sites and tried to replicate them. Obviously I have made a mistake somewhere.
Could there be any limitation on the ASA 5505 in terms of licensing and the number of S2S tunnels?
We have got site to site VPN configured between local site with PIX515 6.3(5) and remote site with ASA 5505 7.2(4) . Because of very unreliable internet connection in remote site , we have added new ISP link which we want to use as redundant link .i understand ASA 5505 can be configured with two ISP link with SLA monitor method for redundancy as per this document ,[URL]
my question is how do i set up this pix 515 to have redundant VPN tunnel with remote site (when primiary ISP link fails in remote site and secondary ISP links takes over ) . I was thinking of using PIX 515 with 2 peers in same crypto map used for that sepcific site to site vpn tunnel,not sure that is the right way or not though.But how would i configure ASA 5505 to use backup interface(where secondar isp router conects ) to particitae in Site to site Tunnel .
We have a Cisco ASA 5510 at our main office that makes connection with a 5505 at our other office using site to site VPN. (works)
Now for the question,
we want to access our other office from the main office but we wont want them to have access to our servers etc. so basically we want to control them but they shouldn't have the rights to control us.
Is this possible with a site to site VPN? and how to do it.
We are setting up a new phone system using the UC540 with a VPN connection between 2 buildings using 2 Cisco ASA 5505's at either end.The problem I am having is getting the phones at the remote site to connect to the UC540 at the main site.
Phones/Computers (10.0.1.0/24) -- ASA -------------VPN Tunnel------------- ASA -- UC540 -----------Data Vlan1 (10.0.0.0/24)
|------Voice Vlan100 (10.1.1.0/24)
What i am told by UC500 support is that the phones at the remote site will connect if they have connectivity to the TFTP subnet on the UC540, which is 10.1.10.0/30 I added the static route on the ASA and I can ping the 10.1.10.1 TFTP server on the UC540 from the ASA, but not for any other device on the 10.0.0.0/24 network, such as the DC. I added the static route there and was able to ping, so something in the ASA seems to be preventing it.
I also can't seem to get the ASA at the remote site to ping 10.1.10.1. I've tried adding the static route there in hopes it would forward it through the VPN tunnel.
I have an issue with my site to site VPN. I have 4 sites connected to my main HQ site via Cisco ASAs 5505 firewalls. The problem is that once and then the sites disconnected from my main site. This disconnection is not happening at the same time for the the 4 sites. For example, it might be different site each time disconnected.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI have a site to site VPN configured on a asa5505. The tunnel is up and the interesting traffic is successfully being encrypted. The issue is that when inbound traffic originating from a subnet outside of the encrypted range destin to the subnet within the encrypted range, the return traffic is sent into the tunnel and obviously fails.When traffic from 1.1.1.0/24 to 10.2.2.0/24 traverse the firewall the return traffic goes into the tunnel but it doesn't have the correct match parameters?Am I missing something? I'm expecting that only traffic matching the crypto map will use the tunnel and all other traffic will utilize the default route.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to configure a Site-to-Site VPN in a Cisco ASA 5505 firewall which is behind an ISP router (Cisco 800 Series) configured in routing mode (not bridging) and with a static nat of all the ports to the firewall (avoiding bridging mode of the router). [code]
View 12 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to establish a vpn tunnel with a sonic firewall. We've checked both ends for differences and they are the same. PFS has been disabled on both ends. I'm seeing this in the logs.
%ASA-3-713119: Group = x.x.x.x, IP = x.x.x.x, PHASE 1 COMPLETED
%ASA-5-713068: Group = x.x.x.x, IP = x.x.x.x, Received non-routine Notify message: No proposal chosen (14)
[Code].....
cisco products and am struggling getting a VPN going between an ASA 5505 and 5510. I have a VPN created (using the VPN wizward on both) and it shows the VPN is up, but I can't ping the remote site (from either side).
View 11 Replies View RelatedI have ASA 5505, i configured site to site vpn between central site and remote site and is working. Now the problem is we use remote site for troubleshooting purpose, so we need to create a tunnel from remote site to central site. I need to configure such a way that remote site can craete a tunnel to central site, but central site not able to create a tunnel, it just respond to remote site.
View 3 Replies View Relatedi have 2 router asa 5505 with base license i wanna make site to site vpn connection and remote site using vpn client to connect first i have hdsl router with 5 public ip i wanna try it by giving 1 public ip to each router and try the vpn but nothing work?
View 1 Replies View RelatedHow to route my internet traffice through the same interface where I have my site to site vpn configuried on.1) I'm using a ASA 5512 2) configuried a site to site VPN on g0/0 interface ( leased line with internet connect to the FW) 3) have a global IP assinged to the g0/0 ( site to site vpn established between two countries using global IP address at both ends ) ,4) security level 0 for g0/0 , LAN users inside( g0/1) security level 100 ,What i want to know is, how can i configure my LAN users to access internet via the g0/0 interface using the same global ip address assigned to it. not to route the internet through VPN,but i want to route it to my local ISP.
View 0 Replies View RelatedWe have two ASA5510's connected to two different ISP's and both able to initiate a site-site IPsec connection to a remote site. Depending on the state of the ISP's either ASA may initiate this VPN.We use Reverse Route Injection into OSPF for VPN clients and it works fine with the route being distributed when a client connects and disappearing when there are no clients.So we thought we'd try it for our site-site VPN's. Unfortunately when we enable Reverse Route Injection the routes are distributed regardless of whether the VPN is up or not, so if one ASA has initiated a VPN it's reverse route is distributed (which is what we want) but the other ASA also distributes a route for it's non-existent VPN. The result is that our gateway routers see two OSPF routes and can't ascertain which route is actually up.
Is there any way to distribute the route using Reverse Route Injection (or any other method) only when a site-site VPN is actually up? For various reasons we can't use BGP or other gateway routing protocols.Our ASA5510 are currently running IOS 8.2(1)
I have some VPN site to site ( site B and site C connect to site A ). This subnet 10.0.56.0/28 is behind site B. Another subnet 10.0.56.16/28 is behind site C. I would like to route this 10.0.56.0/28 to reach the subnet 10.0.56.16/28. Is there any possibility to do this on ASA5520 (site A)?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a functioning site-to-site VPN between two ASA 5505 appiances. Sub-net on one side is 192.168.20.0/24 (inside I/F) and on the other side is 192.168.30.0/24 (inside I/F). VPN is built over public Internet (outside I/Fs of those two ASAs).
Now I connected another subnet on 192.168.30.0/24 - e.g. 192.168.35.0/24. Traffic from 192.168.30.0 subnet is routed to 192.168.35.0 via Gateway at 192.168.30.250 IP.
My task is to make packets from 192.168.20.0 subnet to go to 192.168.35.0 subnet and vice versa.
I setup a static route on 20.0 ASA's Inside interface as 192.168.35.0 255.255.255.0 to 192.168.30.250. I also created NAT examptions for outbound packets from 20.0 to 35.0 and inbound as well. I also added destination network of 35.0 to VPN cryptomap traffic selection (on both ASAs).
With à customer we have à site to site VPN connection. In this tunnel there is one subnet routed with a 3des-sha encryption / hash. Now the want to add a new subnet in this tunnel, but with a AES-128 / MD5 encryption / hash. Is it correct if we make a new crypto map with a higher seq. number?
View 5 Replies View Related[code] Site-to-site VPNs in place between Site A and Site B and between each site to the DC. Site A and Site B have Cisco 2911 routers, there are ASA’s at the DC. The existing Site-to-site VPNs carry data and voice traffic between the sites (though voice and data is on separate VLANs in separate subnets)
ISP1 currently used for the existing circuits at Sites A and B but we have experienced issues with them recently which has disrupted service. So new circuits are to be installed at each site with ISP2. (See basic diagram attached which shows current set-up with intention to get new circuits via ISP2 installed)
We have 3 ports on our Cisco 2911 routers with 2 ports already in use for the existing connections (1 for the LAN and 1 for the WAN connection to ISP1) Can we simply use the 3rd port for the connection to ISP2 or would it be far more advisable to use a 2nd router (for redundancy, etc)
Would it be feasible to have a set-up where we have e.g. voice traffic go over a site-to-site VPN via ISP1 and data traffic go via site-to-site VPN via ISP2 but each can take over from the other in the event of a failure?
Question on ASA VPN tunnels. I have one ASA 5510 in our corporate office, I have two subnets in our corporate office that are configured in the ASA in a Object group. I have a site to site IPSEC tunnel already up and that has been working. I am trying to set up another site to site IPSEC tunnel to a different location that will need to be setup to access the same two subnets. I'm not sure if this can be setup or not, I think I had a problem with setting up two tunnels that were trying to connect to the same subnet but that was between the same two ASA's. Anyways the new tunnel to a new site is not coming up and I want to make sure it is not the subnet issue. The current working tunnel is between two ASA 5510's, the new tunnel we are trying to build is between the ASA and a Sonicwall firewall.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have 2821 router at headquarters with 3 DSL WICs and Static IP's. There are 14 remote sites. All sites are equipped with 876 ADSL Routers and Static IP. I also have an application server at headquarters. Is it possible to split my VPN's in two groups each containing seven sites, one for the first DSL line and the second for the second DSL line. I am planning to use the third DSL line for internet surfing.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe've just deployed a site-to-site VPN using a 5505 ASA on the client's site and a checkpoint Nokia FW on our site. Everything seems to be fine except that the user's connections to their file shares seem to be intermittently dropping. One minute the connection to the shares is there, next thing it's lost. There is no logic to it because no two users are experiencing issues at the same time, as a matter of fact even on the same PC where a user has access to 3 shares on 3 different servers, one could be showing as connected whereas the other two be dropping. [code]
As you can see the Duplex and Speed are set to auto, I've rectified this since then and I'm keeping a close eye on the output errors, and collisions. However, I'm afraid that this did not rectify the issue and the users are still experiencing intermittent connection dropping to their file shares over the VPN!
Got an ASA5505 connected to another endpoint running IPsec and being NAT'd at each end to a 10.0.0.0/24 network. I can pass other types of traffic through the ASA 5505 but not RTP traffic. The moment it is NAT'd and hits the firewall rules it gets denied by the default deny at the bottom of the list.
Currently the rules are as follows
Incoming External
allow ip any any
allow tcp any any
allow udp any any
default deny
[code]....
It wont allow us to setup a voip call...however when the same call manager sets up a voip call NOT using this ipsec tunnel it works just fine.