Cisco Firewall :: ASA5505 For Passive FTP?
Apr 18, 2012
setting up ASA to allow passive FTP connection! I can get the FTP client to connect but it does not pull the directories. I have opened 21 and range of 55536-55566. I had some trouble gettting the range opened and saved. Normally with other small business routers (GUI) I make sure those ports are forwarded and ftp works.
Is the ftp inspection killing connection or is it my config?
ASA Version 8.4(2)
!
hostname ciscoasa
enable password vRLm0eRL2O14iLM6 encrypted
passwd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted
[Code].....
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Sep 12, 2011
Users cannot download some files from a FTP in a software over VPN Explanation users work with a program and inside the program they download claim (the software goes to the FTP and download the file)
But the program returns an error 3018 in FTPGET. If the user goes to the old PPTP VPN it works like a charm so the problem is the Cisco VPN.
I cannot post my complete config but we use the filter vpn value to associate a special access-list to a user.
The user that has this problem has this as an access-list.
access-list 201 extended ip permit 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.202.0 255.255.255.0
I've made some research and i've added this info
policy-map global_policy
class inspection_default
Inspection ftp
Still doesn't work.
I have to add that normally the internal network is 2.0 and not 202.0 but since we have user with 2.0 at home we had to do this.
So when a user sends a request to 202. the cisco fowards it to the Juniper inside the network and it translate it back to 2.0 Also that is the ONLY thing that doesn't work. The client can work all day on that program and it will work #1 exept when she does the claims
I am also been working on this VPN for 2-3 months without any problems.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 4, 2012
I have a few remote locations that use a Cisco 5505 to connect to my server through a VPN Tunnel. When they establish a connection through the tunnel they use FTP with the PASV command and successfully send and receive data. No issues. The same remote locations will connect to external FTP sites without a VPN tunnel and attempt to use FTP with PASV and the connection fails after the PASV command is issued.Also, when these sites connect to my FTP server all their internal addresses are configured with a Dynamic HIDE NAT. They don't use this NAT rule when they connect to other FTP sites.
The question is why would an FTP connection through a VPN Tunnel work with PASV, but on a non-tunneled connection the Cisco 5505 blocks the connection.I would think that the connection should drop in both scenarios. What makes the VPN Tunnel connection special to prevent the connection drop? (I just learned about the fixup protocol with the group policy change to resolve the problem. So I can resolve the issue. But I'm interested in knowing why there is a discrepancy.)I did ask our network team and they thought it was somewhat strange too.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 11, 2012
How can I allow passive ftp communication in PIX 6.3(5)106.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 28, 2013
I had a design question, Currently we have a active/passive asa 5520 firewall setup. We have our edge router (3845), on which Gig 0/0 connects to the internet, Gig 0/1 connects to a port on the active firewall. We also have a one port fast ethernet card on the router.How can i use the fast ethernet port on the router to connect to the passive firewall, so that if the active firewall fails, there is internet connectivity through the fast ethernet port on the router.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 12, 2012
i have a problem with a Failover Pair of 5510. The Boxes run with the software version 8.2.5.
If the Active ASA goes down, the Standby ASA switch to Active.
If i switch on the old Active ASA, both ASA are Active. This problem don't solved with the command 'no failover active' on the Standby box. This problem only solved with the command 'no failover' and then 'failover' on the Standby box.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 26, 2012
I'm having problems getting FTP to work through two FWSM virtual contexts which are connected via a vrf. All this is configured on a 6500 switch with the FWSM running 3.1(4)
CLIENT-----CONTEXT_1-------VRF------CONTEXT_2--------FTP_SERVER
At the moment we can make the control connection but when we issue commands the connection times out.
Looking at the logs we can see the initial connection made to the server on port 21 from the client, this is also seen on the second firewall context (nearest the FTP server). The data channel is then seen on the first context, made using high src & dst port numbers and initiated from the client, successfully passing the ACL/Inspection, then on the second context we see the connection being denied by the incoming ACL on the second contexts interface connected to the VRF instance.
The rules are identical on the contexts and have been made by copying and paste the rule using CSM, we are using the predefined service group 'FTP-Group' which contains both tcp 20 & 21. FTP inspection is at default on both contexts.
We have tested with Win XP (capable of Active FTP only) & Firefox 3.6.12 which is the connections we are seeing in the logs trying to do Passive FTP.
Is this a problem with teh contexts randomizing sequence numbers or TCP Normalization? Or do we just have a problem with the Inspection engine on one of the contexts (I would have expected to see this on both contexts if it was a bug).
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 24, 2011
I have the following Setup, Two Cisco ASA 5520 needed to be configured in HA Active/Passive. The Firewalls includes also AIP module. Does the ASA 5520 will internally make the AIP modules also HA Active/Passive? Is there a document regarding the issue? Is there a seperate license for the AIP modules for HA scenario?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 20, 2011
Currently l have two ASA 5520's in a active/passive failover scenario. Currently the interfaces for the inside and outside are fixed at 100/FULL.I want to repatch them into GigE ports setup as Auto Negotiate.Is there anyway of keeping the connections through the firewall active in this type of scenrio or will l have downtime disconnecting and repatching? or could l possibly disable failover and reconfigure each ?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Feb 24, 2011
I have a normal setup of ASA5505 (without security license) connected behind an internet router. From the ASA5505 console I can ping the Internet. However, users behind the Firewall on the internal LAN, cannot ping the Internet even though NATing is configured. The users can ping the Inside interface of the Firewall so there is no internal reachability problem. In addition, I noticed that the NAT inside access list is not having any hit counts at all when users are trying to reach the internet.
When i replace the ASA5505 with a router with NAT overload configuration on it, the setup works normally and users are able to browse the internet.
The ASA5505 configuration is shown below.
hostname Firewall
interface Ethernet0/0
description Connected To Internet Router
switchport access vlan 10
[Code].....
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 17, 2011
i have asa 5505 with the asdm v5.2 (4), and the asa v7.2(4). This platform has a base license. if i upgrade adsm and asa on v6.2(1) and v8.2(2) if I lose my license and that you need to activate them? i configured site to site vpn (this firewall and the another) that i lose my configuration if i upgrade my firewall.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 14, 2011
I've recently upgraded my old firewall from a PIX to an ASA5505 and have been trying to match up the configuration settings to no avail. I have is that I can't ping the new firewall on it's inside interface, despite having "icmp permit any inside" in the running config. Secondly, the server I have on there ("Sar") can't connect out to the internet.I've included the ASA's running config incase anybody can see if something stands out. I have a feeling it's either not letting anything onto the inside interface, or there is no nat going on. Lastly (and possibly relevant), the firewall is actually going at the end of a vlan, which is different to the firewall's inside vlan number. I don't know if this is actually the problem because the server can't connect out even if connected directly into the firewall.
View 32 Replies
View Related
Jan 9, 2013
Internet ISP -> Juniper SRX 210 Ge-0/0/0
Juniper fe0/0/2 -> Cisco ASA 5505
Cisco ASA 5505 - >Inernal LAN switch.
1. Internet is connected to Juniper Ge0/0/0 via /30 IP.
2. Juniper fe0/0/2 port is configured as inet port and configured the Internal public LAN pool provided by the ISP. And this port is directly connected to Cisco ASA 5505 E0/0. Its a /28 pool IP address. This interface is configured as outside and security level set to 0.
From Juniper SRX, am able to ping public Internet IPs (8.8.8.8).
Issue:
1. From ASA am unable to ping public ip configured on Juniper G0/0/0 port.(/30)
2. From ASA no other Public internet IP is pinging.
Troubleshooting Done so far.
1, Configured icmp inspection on ASA.
2. Used the packet tracer in ASA, it shows the packet is flowing outside without a drop.
3. Allowed all services in untrust zone in bound traffic in Juniper SRX.
4. Viewed the logs when I was trying the ping 8.8.8.8 in ASA. It says "Tear down ICMP connection for faddrr **** gaddr **
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 1, 2013
I'm trying to troubleshoot an ASA5505.
The original goal was to block "Mumble/Murmur" (a voip app) traffic, which runs on TCP/UDP 64738, both inbound and outbound, except to a certain host (63.223.117.170).
However, when nothing I tried seemed to make a difference, just to troubleshoot, I decided to try blocking all inbound traffic. I first disconnected ethernet port 0/0 to ensure that it was cabled correctly and the outside interface went down when I did. That worked as expected, so I confirmed I had the right interface and it was cabled correctly.
I then applied a "any any deny ip" rule as the first element in the outside interface access_list, as you can see below. However, it appears to have had no real effect and the hit count is very low (it should be astronomical).
show ver
Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software Version 9.0(2)
Device Manager Version 7.1(2)
Compiled on Thu 21-Feb-13 13:10 by builders
System image file is "disk0:/asa902-k8.bin"
[Code].....
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 7, 2013
what is active/passive port-channel..? and how it will do load balancing when my network traffic is flowing on both the ports.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 1, 2012
I am using ftp server over internet, for this I am able to connect with ftp server successfully but unable to transfer data. I am unable to see the file's list on connected ftp server. I am using the router Cisco 1941 with 15.0 (1r) M12.
There is no firewall or any ACL policy applied that could stop the any type of traffic.
I have also configured ip ftp passive command on it. But still passive ftp not working.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 26, 2011
I have 3750 switch and there are couple of vlans.....i dont want to run the instance on all vlans....so i have decided that i will run passive intreface default command....now my lan link is layer three and i want to run eigrp on that so the command shd be as under?
no passive interface default interface gig1/0/10
no passive interface default interface gig1/0/22
(as i have 2 conections) and want to have two neibours.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 29, 2011
Is it possible to use IP "aliases" on an ASA5505 to use as static NAT public IPs to private IPs? For example, I have int e0/0 connected to my ISP using a /30 subnet and I have my private LAN connected to e0/1 with a /24 subnet. At the moment I can use the one usable IP from the /30 to NAT to the private LAN. The ISP is also routing a /28 subnet to the one public IP of the ASA. I would like to use some of the /28 IPs for NAT also. Can it be as easy as just adding the NAT commands? I figure I would have to add that subnet to the ASA somehow, no? In other devices (including the SA520) they use a concept called IP aliases whereby you define what additional IPs the device can use in its NAT config. Does the ASA support aliases? Maybe I have to do something with VLANs?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 15, 2011
it is possible use 1 or 2 Gb memory with ASA 5505 or only 512 Mb ?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 16, 2011
I have 1 network that I'm trying to make secure, and it needs to access 2 seperate networks. I tried using an ASA5505 that I had on the shelf to accomplish this but discovered that I had the basic license and that was prohibiting me from getting my connection to my 3rd network. I scrapped that idea and grabbed an old pix 501 off the shelf to bring my connectivity to my 3rd network online since the 3rd network is only passing ip traffic to a small group of servers on the outside I figure the 501 should be just fine.
So, here's the problem I am running into:My internal network is 10.10.16.0/16, I have a new domain controller with DHCP on it handing out addresses in the 10.10.16.0/24 range.External Network 1 is 192.168.16.0/24. The services I need from that network are primarily in 192.168.0.0 range, however there is a comcast router 75.123.123.123 (Changed of course) that provides high speed internet I need for my www traffic.External Network 2 is 10.1.1.0/16 I have about 4 servers I need to access on this network and that's it. This network has it's own domain and DHCP controller and I've been given a range of ip's to use on this network of 10.1.3.180-10.1.3.189 My switch is just a plane jane 3com switch with minimal management so I am attempting to use my ASA5505 to handle my layer 3 routing.
So here's my issue:ASA5505 (IN:10.10.16.1, OUT: 192.168.16.6): Passes traffic to External Network 1 and to the comcast router, no problem. All my computers on my 10.10.16.0/16 network have access to everything on 192.168.0.0/24 as well as getting full name resolution and www traffic across the comcast router. Can NOT access 10.1.1.0/16 no matter what. From inside the ASA or from on the inside LAN ports. It CAN ping the PIX 501 PIX 501 (IN:10.10.16.3, OUT: 10.1.3.180) Can ping EVERYTHING. Can ping 192.168.0.0/24, can ping 10.10.16.0/16 and can ping 10.1.1.0/16. Set to globally assign the other IP's in my range as addresses for outgoing traffic.Workstations (IN: 10.10.16.XXX DHCP, using 10.10.16.1 as gateway) Can only access everything on External Network 1. ZERO access to External Network 2. ATM I have both INSIDE and OUTSIDE ACL's wide open for both firewalls just to get connectivity going. I will be tightening it up after it is operational.Attached find a log file (Sensetive data removed of course) that contains the sh run and sh ver for both the ASA5505 and the PIX 501.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 14, 2013
I just got an ASA 5505 with Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software Version 8.0(4) alredy loaded on it. Should I update/upgrade it to the newest IOS release, or is the 8.0(4) good and stable?
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 3, 2012
I'd like to setup a DMZ network with the ASA5505. Do I need the "Security Plus Bundle"?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 25, 2012
I've been trying to get my WRVS4400N connected to my ASA5505 on the internet through a Cox connection, but it isn't working. I cannot get the ASA to be the DHCP server for the wireless router. I've configured the wireless router as a gateway and pointed the DHCP server to the ASA but no addresses are being passed through to the wireless router. I've included a copy of my config.
ciscoasa# sh run
: Saved
:
ASA Version 8.4(2)
[Code].....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 24, 2012
We are trying to utilize a 5 ip block of addresses provided by our ISP. What we have assigned from them is like this: 10.10.10.46 - 10.10.10.50 is our ip range. 10.10.10.45 is the gateway. Subnet is 255.255.255.248. If we assign 10.10.10.46 to the outside interface how do we accept inbound traffic from the other addresses?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Sep 4, 2012
I have Vlan 100 (inside) and Vlan 65 (Outside)I'm trying to configure RDP and ping traffic from Vlan 100 to Vlan 65 One way.If I connect 2 PCs on E0/0 and E0/1 they can happily ping the their own VLAN ip add 192.168.100.3 and 172.16.65.1I've copied my config,
ASA Version 8.4(4)1
!
names
!
object-group network A_Network
network-object 172.16.65.0 255.255.255.0
[code]....
View 9 Replies
View Related
Dec 20, 2011
I have a asa 5505 Sec plus with 3vlan, inside, outside and dmz.
On the outside i have 5 ip's for my use, and in the dmz i have a webserver that need to communicate with one sql server on the inside.
The "sql" also needs to be accessible from outside and thus has a static nat with a dynamic nat so it replies from same ip as on nat ie 72.72.72.5 webserver is natted with 72.72.72.6
sql inside ip is 192.168.1.2, gw 192.168.1.1
webserver ip is 192.168.2.100 gw 192.168.2.1
sec lvl on inside is 100 and on dmz 50
with a dynamic policy running inside-net/24 to dmz-network/24 translagt to dmz 192.168.2.2 i can get it to ping 1 way from inside to dmz, but not the other way around...
All i need is to open 1 port ie 6677 both ways for this communication to work.
I'm not very familiar with the CLI and do most stuf in GUI (know i should learn CLI, but time doesnt let me)...
on access rules i have just added everything from any to any using , ip, icmp, tcp and udp just to be sure... :-)
View 47 Replies
View Related
Feb 29, 2012
I want to make it so if a user tries to use a different DNS server the request will be redirected to the one they should be using.I thought this might work but the ASA doesn't do PB routing
ip access-list extended transparent_dns
permit udp any any eq 53
route-map redirect_dns permit 10
match ip address transparent_dns
set ip next-hop ip.of.your.server
route-map redirect_dns permit 20
[code]....
The DNS server is windows 2003?Would policy based NAT or WCCP work for this? If so how would I go about it?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 22, 2011
I would like to use an ASA5505 as a simple LAN-to-LAN ethernet router. My plan is to configure two interfaces with the same security level and then use the command that allows interfaces with the same security level to communicate with each other. I can get this to work without having to setup and ACLs or NAT stuff.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Oct 1, 2010
for the purpose of a redundency, incase the primary ISP goes down the backup kicks in.Can this be done with the basic license (max 3 vlans) or you need to have the security plus license. (20 vlans) Currently not using the 3rd vlan (dmz)
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 31, 2012
Do some have some realistic performance numbers for a ASA 5505 on a mixed setup with local internet breakout and site to site vpn ( and don't tell me 150 mbps 3des throughput on a 100 mbps ethernet) - what can be expected in a live environment where we f.ex feed it with a 100 mbps internet connection - with a site to site vpn with f.ex 20 office workers running office on a remote terminalserver and mixed local internet breakout.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 14, 2012
customer's WAN solution, instead of buying routers, purchasing department bought ASA's (don't even get me started!). So I have 5 ASA 5505's for the branch offices and one 5510 for the Head Office. I am trying to get them to behave like routers and pass the traffic across. I set up a lab with a 5505 and the 5510 using an ethernet cable for both Outside interfaces since the WAN links are going to be MetroEthernet Layer 2 anyway.
I tried static routes, dynamic routing, I followed examples from other persons who did it and it doesn't work. I attached the configs here to show I have the default routes, specific static routes pointing the traffic out, any any rules configured as well. I cannot ping from the internal lan of the 5505 to the internal lan of the 5510.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 29, 2011
I don't really know how this things work, but somehow i know that when you summarized few subnets into 1 in RIPv1 protocol in router, you would need this command, but how this things actually works?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 25, 2012
Currently we are using a single connection to our ISP and in the coming months will be moving to a two seperate connections (to same ISP). In our current setup we utilize active/passive ASA's (5520, single context) and would like to utilize that going forward as well, the reason being is our DMZ's all hang off of these ASA's and we have fiber connectivity between our datacenters.Our main datacenter and DR Datacenter are basically one big LAN with fiber between them, so we have our DMZ networks at both locations currently with both terminating in our ASA's. That way if the ASA at our current site fails the DMZ's are still accessible via the secondary firewall at our DR facility.
View 1 Replies
View Related
