Cisco :: LMS 3.2 User Tracking 10GE Trunk To HP Blade System C7000
Sep 12, 2010
situation:
LMS 3.2
Cat6509 w. 4 port 10 GE module connected with trunk to
HP BladeSystem c7000 Enclosure
with
HP Virtual Connect Flex-10 10Gb Ethernet Module
with
#20 of ESX servers, Citrix
UT settings: "config trunk for end host disc. = enable on this trunk." No show for connected MAC's of the server and end hosts (Citrix sessions).
Note: this works well for a ESX based DL380 server connected with 1GB trunk to a C3750. Why is this not working for this Cat6509 configuration ? Is the 10 GE port supported in Campus manager?
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jun 4, 2013
We install a stack of C3750x switches rescently. A HP C7000 blade server uplink to C3750x using etherchannel and 802.1Q.If the trunk includes a RSPAN vlan on it by 802.1q default configuration, the VM on HP blade cannot ping the same vlan server on C3750x.If the trunk is configured by "allow vlan" and exclude the RSPAN vlan, then the connection is ok.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 1, 2011
I was wondering if it is possible to track and or log the changes that users make in in LMS 4.1. For an example if someone changed a configuration I want that being logged. I want to see what the person changed, when it's changed and who changed it.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 27, 2011
what is the best way to do a acquistion on ip address on devices that appear to be dead until ping before LMS4.1 reports onn them. For example we run acquistion on a branch we do not see 172.20.12.51, howver we ping it from my desktop Claims unplugged when plugged in, and says "safe to remove" when I unplug the cableand then run user tracking and then it shows up.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 1, 2011
I am trying to determine why hosts off our Nexus 7010s are being picked up in UT. Since LMS 4.0.1, UT should be supported on these devices.When adding the Nexus devices to DCR, provide the netadmin SNMP RO credential.When other SNMP RO credential is provided, user tracking will not collect end host data.I think I have this setup correctly as the device center test passes when cehcking snmp ro credentials.Our 7010s are running NX-OS 5.0(3) - earlier than the recommended version - might that cause issues? We are not using VRFs other than the default and management.
Here is my snmp section:
sh run | sec snmp
ip access-list copp-system-acl-snmp
10 permit udp any any eq snmp
10 permit udp any any eq snmp
20 permit udp any any eq snmptrap
[code]....
View 12 Replies
View Related
Nov 27, 2011
in LMS 4.1, under Monitor->Identity Dashboard, i have "user tracking summary" as a portlet, which tells me i have ~ 17,000 users. when i click the report, it pops up a screen that shows mac address, ip address, hostname, subnet, etc.
If i try to do ANY filtering, it returns 0 records. this could be from a specific IP, mac address, device name, or subnet. i have tried every type of record. every filter i attempt always ends with 0 records returned, even though in the unfiltered list they show up. It would be problematic to manually sort through 17,000 users looking for the particular records i need without the ability to use the filter.
how to filter the User Tracking report? is there some feature in LMS i don't own or have enabled to allow this filtering?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 15, 2012
I have just got LMS 4.2 soft appliance up and running. When going to Inventory >> Acquisition summary, I get a HTTP 500 error with java. lang.Null Pointer Exception. That is obviously a bug somewhere (although the TAC engineer disagrees with me). I am just wondering if this is could have been caused by the fact that I have not done any user tracking on this LMS server yet? [code]
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 18, 2013
We are running LMS 4.3.2, it was running OK... but now we receive the following message:
"User Tracking Major Acquisition cannot be started as Network Topology, Layer 2 Services and User Tracking are disabled."
All processes are running. System restart and re-install the 4.3.2 update does not fix it. I think this happens after a device update, maybe FaultManagementDeviceUpdate...
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 6, 2011
I have an interesting problem at one of my customers. They are using LMS 4.0.1, but they have a problem with user tracking with SNMPv3. They using a very simple SNMP configuration, wich is the following: [code]
Now they have UT working well for their Ctalyst 4500 switches, and the half of the 6500s (They have 2950 switches as well, but for those UT with SNMPv3 is unsupported). So the problem is the following: they have 12 6500 switches, with the same IOS version (10 pieces of WS-C6506-E + SUP720-3B IOS: 12. 2 (18) SXF17 (IP Services), 2 pieces of WS-C6506 + SUP720-BASE IOS: 12.2(18)SXF17 (IP Services)). They have identical SNMP configuration on both devices. Based on the logs from LMS it seems that on the problematic switches for some reason LMS identifies the switchports as routed: [code]
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 9, 2013
I try to aquier IP Phone in User Tracking. Phones are present but like pc (without other information...DN, user....)
the LMS version is 4.2.3
the CUCM version is 8.6
the CUCM is green on Topology..
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 4, 2011
I've another problem with our new LMS 4.0.1.We manage our devices with SNMP v3 but the user tracking don't want to work flawlessly.I've attached an example from our SNMP configuration. Basicly it's the same in our devices.
1st the problem was that no matter what I did the User tracking didn't want to find any host. I left it and worked on something else. After 2 weeks suddenly appeard couple of thousand end host.As earlier (LMS 2.6 or 3.2 with snmp v2) it is the same that LMS cannot differentiate normal end host and IP Phones although we have several thousand from both. But this is only one problem. The other is that there are switches with the same IOS and SNMP configuration and from one I get the UT data and from another one I didn't get anything. Only from some 4506 (aprox. 12-15) and 6506 (2) works and we have 20+ 4506 and 10+ 6506. Not to mention the other switches (couple of houndred 2960 and 3750).
View 10 Replies
View Related
Oct 19, 2011
I have a problem about user tracking for LMS 4.0.
For example:Switch 4506 send the endhosts for every VLAN that it has configured, except for one, but I can see that VLAN is configured over the switch.
are there problems directly with the connected endhosts over this VLAN or is it a problem about configuration for user tracking settings ?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 23, 2011
I've the following problem, configured dynamic user tracking on a WS-C4506-E with a WS-X45-SUP6L-E, System image file is a Version 12.2(53)SG2
Interface configuration:
snmp trap mac-notification change added
snmp trap mac-notification change removed
[Code].....
View 12 Replies
View Related
Dec 25, 2012
If I have understand correctly, the IP address - mac address matching was made with the arp table of a cisco acces switch if it will made the L3.
My access switch wasn't used for L3 routing, only L2
It's possible to set user track to use the arp table of a firewall or a router for made this matching ?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 15, 2013
I am using LMS 4.2 I have enabled user tracking and I am getting ip address, MAC address ,hostname in user tracking table . But username entry in user tracking is not getting populated . Even I have enabled get user name from the hosts in NTS and ND host domains in user tracking acquisition settings .Is there anything else that I need to configure in LMS in order to get the usernames in user tracking table?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 13, 2012
I have a problem with LMS 4.2 user tracking.When I generate a report on all my network all mac address are ok but there is no Hostname/Ip address in the result, except for 2 equipments.the only difference between these 2 equipements and the rest of the network is that they are connected on a not routed vlan. All the other phones, computers are connected on a routed vlan.I have a Nexus 5k as core and 2960 as access. Routing between vlans is done with the NexusMy DNS server is ok and reachable.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 21, 2012
I am experiencing an issue with end host being discovered on a cisco 4510. Anything connected to modules 9 or 10 are not discovered in User Tracking. The switch is running: Cisco IOS Software, IOS-XE Software, Catalyst 4500 L3 Switch Software (cat4500e-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 03.02.01.SG RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc4).
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 28, 2011
I am using lms 3.2.1 and CM 5.2.2. I have even enabled ping sweep but the hosts IP never show on the user tracking report. I can not see any Available Subnets/Available Sources on Configure Subnet Acquisition and Ping Sweep windows. When I try to enable End host discovery on Trunks and click Show Trunks comes a message: "There are no Trunks in the device(s) selected", but every access device is connected to the nexus core via a Port channel:
interface Port-channel1
description sw-ser-core01 Po12
switchport trunk native vlan 998
[Code]....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 15, 2012
I have an LMS 3.2.1 server running user tracking collection starting at 11:30am. We also use InterMapper to monitor switches. Right around the time UT collection is running, InterMapper starts to alert about "No SNMPv2c response".
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2011
New install discovered router and switches at same location with no issues. However when running an acquisition on those switches most fields are populated except the ip address of end host associated with port. Mac address, port speed, etc. but no ip address info on per port basis. Using snmp v3 if that makes a difference.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Nov 2, 2011
Does Cisco have any plans to incorporate the CiscoWorks User Tracking Utility into LMS Prime 4.2 or any newer version of LMS? This tool is very useful in identifing where a computer or device is located on a switch. I know SolarWinds just came out with their own version of the User Tracking utility, and I am wondering if Cisco is going to continue on with theirs.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2011
We are using Catalyst 3750 with 12.2(44)SE. We have two stack configured, one with IP routing enabled. When we try to run an Acquisition Action on IP routing enabled stack, from Admin> Collection Settings> User Tracking, the system replies with an error "Failed to start acquisition: Device unreachable. Please enter a valid device". Acquisition starts successfully when we try with the other stack. We are going to investigate!
View 9 Replies
View Related
Mar 28, 2012
I have a problem with User tracking. After a restart of the daemon manager or a reboot of the server the end host table is empty. All end hosts then have to be discovered again. is there any possibility to backup and restore the UT-Database?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 9, 2012
We just deployed some Catalyst 3750X-48PF-L switches. I noticed that the user tracking report doesn't work normally.The switches have C3KX-10Gb NM modules, and all access port are 1 Gbit. But in the User Tracking report, I see devices found on Fa0/43 for example (this is because the previous switch was a Catalyst 2960. I deleted the old switch and add the new 3750X, so this could not be the cause of the problem).I installed all the patches that are available for LMS 4.0.1.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 6, 2012
I am facing the following issue. In our environment we have a couple of WS-C2960S-24TS-L configured as stack. These switches are configured as VTP mode transparent.We are running LMS 4.1 and although UserTracking Acquisition works fine for all other switches, it only runs on demand for the above. The user tracking report for these switches shows only the MAC of the connected end hosts, without the respective IP address. The vlan I am interested in is configured on both the gateway (cisco 6509) and the switches, and the subnet is routable.Show arp on the gateway does show the "mac-ip address" binding, so I would have thought that usertracking would have been able to report both IP and MAC.
Why does usertracking only run on demand for the above switches in vtp mode transparent?Why does the UserTracking report show only the MAC and not the IP?Are the above issues related to the vtp mode? I have ruled out any connection to the switch-model, because we have recently installed the same switches in VTP mode client and User Tracking Acquisition works fine for them.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 9, 2011
Using Custom Reports from Reports> Report Designer> User Tracking to create an end host report we get this error message: the syntax is not valid the system cannot find the path specified.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Sep 19, 2011
I have installed LMS 4.0.1 again. Now LMS is running on a Windows 2008 R2, 64 bit. Using Custom Reports from Reports> Report Designer> User Tracking to create an end host report I get this error message: "The syntax is not valid: the system cannot find the path specified". Anyway, the report is created but I’m not able to edit or delete: it is not listed on Available Custom Reports.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Feb 27, 2013
We are running LMS Prime 4.2.3 on a Softappliance. We have a Cisco Switch behind a Non Cisco Layer-3 Device. In the end host tabe we see only the MAC-Addresses of the host connected to this switch. No IP-Address. The corresponding IP-Addresses are in the ARP-Table of this non Cisco Layer-3 Device. The arp table can also be read by snmp. Is it possible to get the ip address in the UT End Host Table in such an environment?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 6, 2013
Had a Sev 1 issue today. We have a bunch of Nexus 5ks connecting to some HP C7000 Chassis for the use of Virual environments. Engineers build and tear down servers during the day, however today, an engineer configured a virtual machine accidently with its IP address as the default gateway. Each pair of nexus switches has one physical SVI per vlan and a HSRP address for the vlan. Of course this engineer configuring the server IP address as the HSRP address killed the vlan... which lead me onto think... are they are tried and tested techniques to protect this from happening on the switch. Enforcing the ARP/MAC of the HSRP address and not allowing it to change or any other device to change it?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 11, 2013
Is there really any reason why you wouldn't use spanning-tree portfast on a trunk port other than a trunk between two switches? We have it enabled on all ports except for the fiber trunk between two non-stacked switches and the trunk ports connected to our Astaro firewall.I'd like to enable it on the ports to the firewall unless that would cause issues.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Feb 12, 2012
we recently aquired a managed services job and have to do a overhaul of the vlan configs and have a whole dozen WC2948G's trunk between a set of ports as well as trunk out a LAG channel setup to non cisco equipment. the deal is the lacp-channel works properly on both ends but no routing of vlans between ports and between the lag trunk are working.
theres alot of settings in the config and im planning on clearing it and starting from scratch but before i do i want to know where my problem lies.
[code]...
View 6 Replies
View Related
Oct 9, 2012
I'm having a problem at the moment getting a Cisco switch (2960G) to work properly with a Dell blade enclosure. The config that we have on the switchports is;description Bladeswitchport access vlan 120 speed 100duplex fullndhowever, with this configured, it's throwing up a lot of CRC errors. I've taken the last two lines out, and there are less CRC errors but the connection starts running really slow.Are there any further steps that I would need to take to fully troubleshoot the issue, or is there a simple config change that could be made to resolve it?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Mar 13, 2013
I have a question regarding WISM2 DP and licensing.
Suppose i have a WISM2 with 7.0, 500AP license today and i activate WISM2-DP by upgrading to 7.2,Do i get 500 AP capacity for free (total 1000AP) or do i get 250APs on each WISM2-blade ?
If i get 500APs for free, why is Cisco selling an expensive licensed 1000 AP WISM2 ? I better buy a single-plane 500AP-WISM2 and upgrade it myself then...50% profit.
Is this the same for a WISM2-300 (supporting 300 APs) ?When i activate WISM2-DP here, do i get an extra 300 AP or an extra 500 APs ? Or 150AP on each blade ?
View 7 Replies
View Related
