Cisco Routers :: RV082 Remote Clients Not Able To Access Server
Jul 25, 2011
I have a RV082 and several of my remote laptops cannot access my server using its domain name. It can be accessed using its internal ip address. The issue is that you can log onto the server using remote access and the ip however you cannot use any shortcuts using the domain name. You can see the server with the domin name however no access path is available. This is only on a few remote user laptops. Others work perfectly.
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Oct 23, 2012
I have a customer that has a Cisco 2900 Series ISR on his Headquarters, and has some branches with RV082s.We have VPN Client configured on the 2900 ISR Router and we can connect remotely using the VPN Client to the Headquarters (192.168.1.0) however we can't reach the branches subnets (192.168.2.0, 192.168.3.0, etc.)... we found out that in the RV082 you need to specify the secure traffic as a destination, but in only supports one network (192.168.1.0 or Headquarters in this case), we can't specify the VPN Client pool defined on the ISR so it can reach the incoming VPN Clients.Is there any way to accomplish this? We need to access the branches subnets when connecting using VPN to the 2900 ISR.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 9, 2012
I am trying to configure RV082 router with Mac Native VPN Client for my remote access. However, no matter what I did, I am not able to make it works. Can any one can give me an example of how to conguration my RV082 router and Mac Book Pro(Mountain Lion)?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 10, 2012
When clients connect wirelessly to the WRVS4400N they successfully get a DHCP address from the Windows 2008 server. After they have the address they can no longer access the server. It cannot be pinged, no drives can be mapped and internet access fails because the same server is running DNS. The WRVS4400N is setup for DCHP relay to the server. Wired clients do not have this problem. Wireless clients that connect to a secondary WAP on the same LAN also do not experience this problem. I have updated the router to the latest firmware version, reset it to factory defaults and reconfigured from scratch. Turning the server firewall off has not made any difference either. I have been able to bypass the internet problem by adding a second external DNS server in the DHCP scope options.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 17, 2012
I have a network of 50+ users with half running XP and half running Windows 7. Soon we will be upgrading all users to Windows 7. During the past month a number of the Windows 7 users have reported intermittent Internet connectivity. I would go to their computer and see that they are getting all the correct IP information from the DHCP server and reboot their network adapter. Usually one reset of the adapter would do, but sometimes had to reset it twice or three times before connectivity would occur.
After a few weeks of this more users would report consistent intermittent connectivity. Just to the Internet, as they were able to reach their folders on our file server and were able to receive e-mails from our e-mail server. I decided to monitor the network traffic on one of the adapters having the issue using Wireshark, and found an ARP request and reply for the gateway IP. I logged into the router and found that the reply given to the Windows 7 machine was incorrect, as the MAC address given to the Windows 7 machine was the WAN1 port of the RV082. The LAN port on the router is 192.168.0.1 and has a MAC of xx-xx-xx-xx-xx-x0. The WAN1 port on the router has a public IP and has a MAC of xx-xx-xx-xx-xx-x1. I checked the arp cache on the Windows 7 computers and confirmed that when they have no internet connectivity the ARP cache reads like this: 192.168.0.1 xx-xx-xx-xx-xx-x1 dynamic
The machine is able to ping every machine on the internal network except for the gateway IP. Also, after updating the cache to map the gateway IP with the LAN port MAC address, using: netsh interface ipv4 add neighbors "connection name" 192.168.0.1 xx-xx-xx-xx-xx-x0
the issue was resolved for that Windows 7 machine. However, the issue is ongoing for every Windows 7/Vista machine added to the network. I do not want to update the ARP cache on every Vista/7 machine introduced to the network.We are running firmware 2.0.2.01-tm which was updated from 2.0.0.19-tm just 2 weeks ago.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 30, 2011
I am able to make a connect to my remote RV082, I can ping the inside network gateway from the remote end but I cannot ping or get to any devices on the remote network, my local network is 192.168.15.x and the remote network is 192.168.0.x I am using WIN 7, and using the native VPN setup in WIN 7, I do a print route and everything looks fine there, I can't figure this out
View 8 Replies
View Related
Nov 29, 2012
I'm setting up a site-to-site VPN with an RV082 ( and an RV042). The RV042 is behind an Actiontec modem/router that has the local public IP address. So, this address is registered with dyndns so we can find it with a name.
The name is entered into the RV082 VPN Remote Group Setup as: Dynamic IP + Domain Name (FQDN) Authentication The given name for the dynamic IP is entered into Domain Name: But, in the summary, the entry for the Remote Gateway shows only the name and 0.0.0.0 for the IP address.
This same RV082 can get the same IP address from a ping of the name just fine.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 17, 2012
I have a RV082.I need to disable the firewall, since firewalling is done better elsewhere.However disabling firewall Remote management on wan ip is forcefully enabled.I don't need Remote management, keeping it enabled is a security risk for my setup.I don't understand the rationale behind the choice to forcefully enable remote management if firewall is disabled.Is there a way to disable both firewall and remote management?Or at least a workaround?
I'm on firmware 2.0.0.19-tm on a probably v2 hardware. (Cannot find this info in the web configuration).This is not the newest even for v2 hw but I cannot afford to break it trying to upgrade the firmware.Moreover no release notes for firmware releases refers to a correction of firewall/remote management behavior.Is this behavior also in newer firmware releases?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 19, 2010
The RV082 is a great unit, however when VPN clients connect the QuickVPN Client has a setting to use the Remote DNS settings of the RV082. The RV082 has no way of linking or using a user-defined DNS. I have an internal DNS Server that I would like the VPN Clients to query on internal name lookups (kindof the point of having client vpn, so they can access internal network shares etc. On the diagnostic page the ping and name resolution can only check external DNS and internal IP's. Wouldn't it make sense to at least make the RV082 aware of internal DNS Servers? Then the Ping and DNS lookup would be able to test both zones? Is this something that can be looked at by Linksys Developers for this product? The WRV210 (a cheaper and lower level model) has this functionality.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Dec 12, 2012
I have 2 site here:
site A
Cisco 891
external IP: 195.xxx.yyy.zzz
VPN Gateway for Remote users
[Code]....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 31, 2012
Is there a way to configure RV180 to allow PPTP clients to route Internet traffic via its own internet connection?
I.e. supporting these client options: "Send all traffic" (Mac/iOS), "Use default gateway on remote network" (Windows).
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 9, 2013
I'm having an issue with the syslog.
My configuration is:
LAN A (RV042)<-> GW to GW tunnel <-> (RV082) LAN B
On LAN A, I got a NAS with a syslog server. On the RV042, I've set the parameters for the syslog server, and it's working fine. On the RV082, I've set the same parameters and noting is happening.
As troubleshooting, I've done the following:
-On the RV082, I can ping the NAS without problems.
-On the RV082, I've set my computer IP adress as syslog server IP and with packet analyser, I not seing any UDP packets.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Aug 21, 2012
We use the RV082 at some our sites. One particular site will not connect to the DNS server but all others will. I've checked every setting I can think of with no joy.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 12, 2011
I have 2 sites :
site A :
ASA 5510
VPN gateway for remote users
LAN 192.168.192.0/22
site B :
ASA 5505
LAN 192.168.208.0/22
Both sites are connected through a site to site VPN.Remote clients (AnyConnect/VPN client) can connect to Site A LAN and see machines on LAN A but cannot see Site B LAN.
Here is a part of my configuration :
On Site A (ASA 5510)
--------------------------------
name 192.168.192.0 SiteA_Internal_Network
name 192.168.208.0 SiteB_Internal_Network
name 192.168.133.0 VPNPool_AnyConnect
name 192.168.133.32 VPNPool_VpnClient
[code]....
View 9 Replies
View Related
Oct 24, 2012
I have an ASA 5520 8.2(3) and allowing my remote client-to-site-vpn clients to access resources directly connected to my ASA on separate lower security interfaces (not the outside) besides just clients on my internal networks. Someone mentioned to me configuring 'VPN on a stick' however from what I've read this seems to be only applicable when it comes to split-tunneling back out the outside interface (could be off on that). Is this possible on other lower security interfaces as well, and if so what would a mock config that accomplishes that look like (acl's, nat, etc)? Also, if I want internal users to be able to connect to these remote clients once they are active, are there any nat statements necessary (such as nonatting them) or are the vpn clients just seen as internal clients from the rest of the internal network's standpoint by default?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 13, 2012
I am setting up a new remote access VPN using the traditional IPSec client via ASA 5515-X runnning OS 8.6.1(5). We require to provide each client multiple DNS suffixes, but are only to provide a single DNS suffix in the group policy.I have tested using an external DHCP server, but using our Windows Server 2008 infrastructure and Option 119 the list is not provided to clients, and I have read that Windows 7 clients may ignore this option anyway.
View 0 Replies
View Related
Apr 15, 2012
I have been asked to set up remote access VPN on an ASA 5505 that I previously had no invlovement with. I have set it up the VPN using the wizard, they way I normally do, but the clients have no access to anything in the inside subnet, not even the inside interface IP address of the ASA. Thay can ping each other. The remote access policy below that I am working on is labeled VPNPHONE, address pool 172.16.20.1-10. I do not need split tunneling to be enabled. The active WAN interface is the one labeled outside_cable. [code]
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 13, 2011
I have a new (linksys/cisco) RV082 Router that I have just set up and everything is working except that I can't configure it to allow public access to our web server. I have tried configuring port forwarding under the Forwarding and UPnP menus and still no access from the outside. I have tried accessing it from the outside using both the URL and the IP address and still no access. I have checked with my ISP and no ports are being blocked from their end. I can ping my public static IP from the outside with no problem. The documentation that I've found for this router refers to a menu that is different from the menu of this router and refers to an Applications & Gaming menu which isn't there, but it seems like the port forwarding should handle this.
I have a static public IP, a static internal IP for the server. I have set the port forwarding and UpNP to point to the IP of the server using port 80 and a secondary forward to port 8080. There are no issues accessing the website from within the LAN.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 17, 2012
Trying to setup split tunneling over Site-to-Site (Gateway To Gateway) VPN between RV082 and Win 2008 server. Tunnel seems to be ok, I can ping/access by IP hosts from both ends. But I can't get split DNS to work. Here is the setup
10.10.100.2 is the DNS server for xyz.local zone. It is at remote network.
The tunnel and routing work properly. I can ping 10.10.100.2 either from RV082 (system management - diagnostics) or from hosts at local network.
Moreover, I can run nslookup on a host from RV082 side (local network), set 10.10.100.2 as server to be queried and test dns resolution. names of hosts from xyz.local are resolved correctly. But. If I use nslookup on host to query RV082 as a DNS server and query for a host from xyz.local it responds that xyz.local is nonexistent domain. The same result I get trying to resolve/ping same name on system management - diagnostics page. Resolution of names from xyz.local fails. But Internet names are resolved
just fine.
I've tried to reboot the router, connect/disconnect the tunnel, set Domain Name fields of split DNS configuration pagein different ways including fqdn of hosts from xyz.local No effect. Just the same situation.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 23, 2013
I've got a Cisco 1941 setup working fine for Cisco Anyconnect. Clients can connect to local resources fine. The issue I have is I need the remote clients to access a third party IP address but to do so they must do it through the VPN. At the moment only local resources are accessed across the vpn and if they need internet they use their own internet connection they are connecting with.I've added the below to make sure traffic going to the IP is going across the VPN.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 6, 2012
Just installed ASA -5505 replaced cisco 851
My exchange server hosts remote outlook clients and remote web access
no one on the remote side can access my exchange server
internal mail flows in bound and out bound.
My iphone can not access the exchange server either.
When the Cisco 851 was online all the above worked great. Nothing changed on the remote client side just put the ASA 5505 in service.
I am new to the ASSA 5505 family. Had a reseller configure the router but unable to get them at this hour. Called Cisco support but they are closed at this time also.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 31, 2013
I am not sure if what I am trying to accomplish is possible. On my internal network I have the following VLANs setup (102, 104, 106) and they map one to one to a subnet (ie: 102 = 192.168.102.0/23, 104 = 192.168.104.0/24, etc).All interVLAN routing is done on a 3560 via vlan SVI. Connected to the 3560 via a routed port is a ASA 5510. The routed port has IP 192.168.100.1 and the ASA interface on the other side of that routed port has IP 192.168.100.2. I use 802.1x on the wired network to assign users (based on their department) into a specific VLAN. I want to extend this concept to Remote VPN access. Therefore I setup multiple Group Policies (policy is applied based on an LDAP attribute) where each policy defines a different DHCP scope. This has successfully allowed me to login wtih different users who get assigned to different Group policies and they obtain the correct DHCP IP address from the internal DHCP server (ie: an engineering person logins remotely and gets an IP in 192.168.102.0 range). However the issue (and as I was planning this out I knew this would come up) is that traffic can be routed out from the VPN client to its destination but there is no return path.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 14, 2013
I've got two RV082's connected. Each has a dynamic IP (changes typically every few weeks). I've configured the tunnels on both ends with a local and remote "Remote/Local Security Gateway Type" of "Dynamic IP + Domain Name(FQDN) Authentication".If I look at the VPN Summary tunnel status, it shows an IP address of "mydomain.dyndns.org 0.0.0.0" under the "Remote Gateway" column heading. The Tunnel Test "Connect" button is N/A.I can resolve both of the mydomain.dyndns.org entries on both sides of each VPN using the Diagnostic DNS lookup tool within each router. If I hardwire a fixed IP address for the Local and Remote Gateway everything works just fine. VPN is good.
I just can't seem to get the "mydomain.dyndns.org" function to work. It appears the router can't resolve the dynamic IP from the domain names on each of the routers.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 24, 2013
We recently moved our network over to RV082 router and its working great, well now we want to take advantage of VPN for our sales staff.
I was able to setup the VPN and using a PC at a remote office I can launch the quick connect and it connects right away, RV0 even shows the user connected. However the user cannot ping anything on our network via name or IP, connect to any resources, etc...
My understanding was when the client VPN would connect the user would get an IP from DHCP (this is on our Server 2008 DC) and they would be using that address, but when I run IPCONFIG on the client PC they just have there standard IP from remote office.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Apr 29, 2013
I know this *should* be simple but having a devil of a time getting it to work.
I have 2 routers. Both have a static ip. Each is setup for a different private subnet. At the moment they are not connected to each other. Consider this setup (made up numbers obviously):
RV016
has 13 lan ports, 2 internet ports, 1 dmz port
Internet port: 10.10.10.10
[Code].....
I'd like clients on the rv082 lan to be able to access the printer on the rv016 lan, and use the rv016 as an alternate internet connection (optional). I would prefer the rv016 client not be able to access the rv082.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 12, 2012
We have two ASA 5500 series Firewalls running 8.4(1). One in New York, another in Atlanta.They are configured identically for simple IPSecV1 remote access for clients. Authentication is performed by an Radius server local to each site.
There are multiple IPSec Site-to-Site tunnels on these ASA's as well but those are not affected by the issues we're having.First, let me start with the famous last words, NOTHING WAS CHANGED.
All of a sudden, we were getting reports of remote users to the Atlanta ASA timing out when trying to bring up the tunnel. They would get prompted for their ID/Password, then nothing until it times out.Sames users going to the NY ASA are fine.After extensive troubleshooting, here is what I've discovered. Remote clients will authenticate fine to the Atlanta Firewall ONLY IF THEY ARE USING A WIRED CONNECTION.
If they are using the wireless adapter for their client machine, they will get stuck trying to login to Atlanta.These same clients will get into the New York ASA with no problems using wired or wireless connections.Windows 7 clients use the Shrewsoft VPN client and Mac clients use the Cisco VPN client. They BOTH BEHAVE the same way and fail to connect to the Atlanta ASA if they use their wireless adapter to initiate the connection.
Using myself as an example.
1. On my home Win 7 laptop using wireless, I can connect to the NY ASA with no issues.
2. The same creditials USED to work for Atlanta as well but have now stopped working. I get stuck until it times out.
3. I run a wire from my laptop to the FiOS router, then try again using the same credentials to Atlanta and I get RIGHT IN.
This makes absolutely no sense to me. Why would the far end of the cloud care if I have a wired or wireless network adapter? I should just be an IP address right? Again, this is beyond my scope of knowledge.We've rebuilt and moved the Radius server to another host in Atlanta in our attempts to troubleshoot to no avail. We've also rebooted the Atlanta Firewall and nothing changed.
We've tried all sorts of remote client combinations. Wireless Internet access points from different carriers (Clear, Verizon, Sprint) all exhibit the same behavior. Once I plug the laptops into a wired connection, BAM, they work connecting to Atlanta. The New York ASA is fine for wired and wireless connections. Same with some other remote office locations that we have.
Below I've detailed the syslog sequence on the Atlanta ASA for both a working wired remote connection and a failed wireless connection. At first we thought the AAA/Radius server was rejecting us but is shows the same reject message for the working connection. Again, both MAC and Windows clients show the same sequence.Where the connection fails is the "IKE Phase 1" process.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WORKING CONNECTION
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%ASA-6-713172: Automatic NAT Detection Status: Remote end is|is not behind a NAT device This end is|is not behind a NAT device
NAT-Traversal auto-detected NAT.
%ASA-6-113004: AAA user aaa_type Successful: server = server_IP_address, User = user
%ASA-6-113005: AAA user authentication Rejected: reason = string: server = server_IP_address, User = user
[code]...
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 22, 2012
I have found numerous posts discussing this but have yet to find a solution. I have an RV082 with firmware 2.0.0. 2.0.0.19-tm and I need a way to limit the incoming smtp traffic to just the spam filtering company.I have a port forwarding rule to forward WAN1 port 25 traffic to 192.168.1.10.I tried to add an access rule to deny all port 25 and then added one to allow WAN1 port 25 source <spam company> destination 192.168.1.10The RV082 log screen shows the traffic allowed but it does not work. If I uncheck the 'enable' box on the DENY port 25 rule email is still blocked. Only when I uncheck the 'enable' box on the ALLOW rule does email start flowing again.
View 10 Replies
View Related
May 9, 2012
I am deploying a small wireless LAN (192.168.1.xxx) at a remote site and would like to access a PC at LAN IP address 192.168.1.2 across the Internet via TeamViewer so as to monitor devices on that LAN. The wireless LAN uses about 12 Cisco Aironet 1310 bridges in a ROOT-NONROOT (I guess this is point-to-multipoint?) configuration.Our ISP has given us a single static WAN IP address, subnet mask, gateway, and two DNS server addresses.
My intent was to assign our static WAN IP address from the ISP to our RV082 router, plug the LAN devices (including the PC at 1.2) into the RV082, and then use Network Address Translation (NAT) to forward TeamViewer traffic to the PC at 1.2. But the RV082's user manual says NOT to use the router's WAN IP address in the NAT table.So I'm confused as to how to send remote TeamViewer traffic to the PC inside my LAN. Is NAT not the way to do this? Should I be using port forwarding instead?I guess another way of skinning this cat would be to put a second NIC in the PC and let the second NIC have the WAN IP address so that it would be the first point of contact from outside, but that defeats some of my purposes for having the RV082 in the first place.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 2, 2011
RV082 Firmware Version 2.0.2.01-tmRV082 Firmware Version 2.0.2.01-tm
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 23, 2011
I am looking at purchasing a new Server, but one of my main requirements is to have remote access for users. What are the requirements for good remoting services and which server OS would provide at least adequate remoting services. That is being remoting that provides concurrent use, speed where things do not load slowly and perhaps ease of use, so users can access files.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 10, 2011
We are having a SRP526W here which replaced a cheap, simple router. Now we would like to set up the VPN-access for outside clients again. So far this was done by forwarding PPTP (TCP 1723 and GRE) to the Windows 2000 Routing and RAS-server inside the network.According to this post the SRP521W, and therefore I suppose as well the SRP526W, are not able to forward GRE: [URL]
Is there a way to provide VPN access for outside clients with this router? Maybe with L2TP (but then we would need to forward ESP) or IPSec (ESP and AH as far as I know)?
If there is no solution we would need to replace this device again with a cheap, simple router which is able to forward GRE - as you can imagine, we would like to save Cisco from this shame.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 25, 2013
I updated my RV180W to the latest firmware and found that port forwarding works I started using it.I've just noticed that since changing over to the RV180W, my Apacher server logs show the router's IP address instead of the remote IP address - every remote request appears to come from 192.168.0.1.
How do I get it to forward the remote IP.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 31, 2012
Ive used an old 2500 in the past with multiple serial connections to achieve console connections to all my devices in remote offices. What to use now a days? I dont want to put in an old 2500, i would rather use something more modern. Ive seen a lot of devices out there.
View 1 Replies
View Related
