Cisco Routers :: RV220W Access Rule Reorder Broken?

Jul 24, 2012

I need to add some rules to block some attacks. I can add them fine but they get added to the end of the list. I try to re-order the rules to put them at the top and can not. I am using Internet Exploder 8 and I put a checkmark on the rule I want to move then click the reorder button. It takes me to a screen that shows 0 rules. I click the Back button and am back at the list of rules on that page. I am running the latest firmware which is from a year ago.

View 3 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Routers :: RV220W - Cannot Reorder 10+ Rules

Jan 1, 2013

We are running an RV220W at the latest firmware (1.0.4.17). Due to certain internal activity we had to add a few firewall rules. Once we exceeded 10 firewall rules we could not reorder them. The reorder page showed the first 10 rules OK, but when you display the next screen (for rules 11 upward) the order is different and any changes do not appear persistant. Therefore you can change the order of the first 10 rules, but not from 11 onwards.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: 3389 Couldn't Make Inbound Access Rule Work For RDP

Apr 18, 2012

1. I could not make an inbound access rule work for RDP. It is configured as follows WAN -> LAN for RDP (TCP 3389) , it didn't work even when I chose "All Traffic".

2. Single Port Forwarding seems to be working though.

3. Destination IP and QoS settings seem to be grayed out, I would like to know why.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W Won't Allow Web Access Across VPN

Dec 12, 2012

We have 2 sites connected thru 2 RV220W routers via VPN and most things are working fine. I have noticed however, that any device that has a web interface, i.e. our Sharp Copier and our Freenas server, is inaccessible. The page tries to come up but then I get the Cisco "server is down" page generated by the RV220W.
 
I can pull up the web interface pages if I use a machine on the local LAN but not on any machine across the VPN. The only commonality I can think of is the RV220W blocking that traffic for some reason..

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W - Restrict Access To One Web Address Only?

Oct 12, 2011

We will be opening a shop with a number of computers available to the public connected to the Web via one ISP with fixed IP using a RV220W router.
 
We wish to restrict web access to our company's web site only, say 'OurCompany.com'; how can we code this in the router?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W Inconsistent User Access?

Jul 28, 2011

I have created 7 QuickVPN users on router and on QuickVPN client. They all work except two. Have deleted and reinstalled on router and in QuickVPN to no avail. Changing the user name by one letter works (eg user NameVPN doesn't work, but NameVP does). Somehow router (I think) is not releasing user credentials/policies (which seems to agree with log). I have rebooted router.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: After Password Change Can't Access RV220W?

Mar 30, 2013

I have changed administrator password to a secure one, just after the changind the password it logged off and offered to login. Now when I put the same password it writes: Invalid password for Admin user Password I used: 8_^!-,Opc: 5Gj3v5<Xb06?9z\SeWr2z9axdPa-f+L:Wj]NzEF2>v!Fu&lS0 There were no warnings that some symbols are not allowed, etc.
 
How can I access my router? what should I remove from the password to get access?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: QuickVPN From One RV220W To Other - No Webpage Access?

Dec 19, 2011

Using QuickVPN from one RV220W to another RV220W I cannot access the Webpage of the remote router.  Goes to "CERTIFICATE NOT VALID" then click through that, and the the login page will not come up.  Sceen flashes a hint of blue background, then turns white, then just sits there saying "Waiting for response from ???.???.QuickVPN will sucessfully connect and I can use all computers behind the router.  Just cannot access the Webpage of the remote router.  I can access the Webpage of the local router.Also, when I hookup using QuickVPN from an "Internet Cafe" that is using a Netgear router.  I can then access the webpage on both remote routers (of course, depending on whom I QuickVPN'd into at the time).
 
Location #1
Office #1
RV220W:  RV220W-A-K9-NA    SER: SER15140314Firmware:  1.0.3.5
IP: 192.168.63.1
 Location #2
Office #2
RV220W: RV220W-A-K9-NA SER: SER151600R2
Firmware: 1.0.3.5
IP: 192.168.2.1
 
I have called Cisco on this with no luck.  They said to update my JAVA.  I am currently JRE 6 Release 30 and still no luck.  The Log files reveal nothing and are darn near unreadable since there is no line breaks in the log file.  Have to manually edit the log to pick stuff out.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: How To Access RV220W Admin Page On IPad

Jul 14, 2011

How to access the admin page of the RV220W from an iPad wih the default security certificate? If so, what steps did you go through? Or is this only possible when purchasing a certificate?

View 10 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W - After Updating Firmware There Is No DHCP And No Access To Anything

Apr 13, 2012

I have a Cisco rv220w.  I just tried updating the firmware.  I used RV220W-Firmware-1.0.3.5.img.  It rebooted, and now there is no DHCP and no access to anything.  I tried the reset button for 10 seconds.  That didn't do anything.  The WAN and all the LAN lights light up.  Power is on and solid.  The light blinks alternating between the DMZ and the blank space to the right of wireless.  How can I get this back to factory defaults?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W PPTP Users Unable To Access Subnet Across Tunnel

Apr 21, 2012

I have two offices connected with an IPSEC VPN tunnel using RV220W routers.  The Tunnel works fine for local users between the two sites(Site 1:10.0.0.x; site 2 is 10.0.2.x).  I have also set up PPTP users for remote access.  PPTP users that connect to site 1 cannot access site 2 and vice versa.   The PPTP users have no trouble accessing the resources on the site that they connect to.  I have tried activating RIP and adding various static routes with no success.  If I PPTP connect to site 1 and I tracert to an IP address on site 2 the route goes to the site 1 router and then goes to the internet(connected to the site 1 router) where it stops.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5505 - Cannot Add Rule Without Deleting Implicit Rule

Jan 18, 2011

what is the purpose of the "Permint all traffic to less secure networks".
 
Well I know the purpose and the technique to handle some sercurity level is nice. when I cannot add add a rule without deleting this implicit rule?
 
The technique of security level is then obsolete?

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV110W Port Forwarding Still Broken In 1.2.0.9 Firmware

May 3, 2012

I installed firmware version 1.2.0.9 a couple weeks ago after seeing in the release notes that the port forwarding bug where clients would get 'no route to host' was resolved (one of the original posts found here:URL
 
After installing the firmware and confirming it's running I've seen no improvement. I still must reboot my router 2-3 times daily so clients can access the ports that are defined in the port forwarding module.

View 23 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W Site To Site Vpn And Internet Access From Single Ip?

Dec 18, 2011

Can I use a single Public IP address for both Internet access and site to site vpn access?If not, can I configure the RV220W as a bridge and still use it via another gateway configured for vpn passthrough as a VPN appliance/server on the LAN?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: Rv082 Dmz Rule Limitations

Apr 27, 2013

we have a RV082 and have the DMZ option enable for a range of IPs within the same subnet of WAN IP and this works great. I have another range of Public IPs from our ISP that is not in the same subnet of the WAN IP and do not see a way on the RV082 to include this 2nd bank of Public IPs in the DMZ. Our ISP internet feed plugs into the RV082 WAN port and we have a switch pulgged into the DMZ port of the RV082 that is used to connect the public devices in the current DMZ. Both banks of Public IPs from our ISP come over via the ISP internet feed plugged into the WAN Port. My question is, if I cannot configure a DMZ rule to allow this 2nd range of Public IPs to "travel" to the RV082 DMZ port.

View 0 Replies View Related

Cisco Wireless :: 602-OEAP Access Point Broken After WLC Upgrade To 7.4.100.0

Mar 7, 2013

I have a TAC case open, but it doesn't seem to be making any progress.I upgraded my 5508 controller from 7.2.111.3 up to 7.4.100.0..Most of my APs are fine. 3500s, 1100s etc.except for 602i APs. The APs associate, they update software etc, but they won't broadcast the WLAN.An interesting thing, on the 602 AP, in the log, I see this:*Mar 06 15:08:12.667: SSID remote, WLAN Profile Name: RemoteOEAP, added to the slot[0], disabled..So the AP is definately talking to the WLC and being pushed the correct WLAN profile.On the controller, the AP shows the the Admin status of the radios is showing DOWN, but the Admin status on the AP itself shows UP
 
I've done a factory reset on the APs to no avail. I have a 2504 WLC as well that i'm in the process of implementing in a DMZ specificially for these APs, and for testing purposes, I associated the 602 Ap to that WLC as well. This one is running 7.4.100.0 too, same results. It would appear to be a problem with this version of software?

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RVS4000 Default Firewall Rule?

Sep 15, 2011

RVS4000 has default firewall rule from ANY WAN -> to ANY LAN with status Allowed. Should that be denied by default, like in RV042 or RVL200?

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: Rv082 Firewall Rule Not Working

Oct 14, 2011

i have a Cisco Rv082 with Firmware v4.0.4.02-tm (Jul 4 2011 13:30:56)I have configure WAN1 with a public IP and netmask 255.255.255.252. (Only one public IP in use) Internally the LAN is a 192.168.169.0/255.255.255.0.I need to add some rules like

Service: HTTP
Interface: WAN1
From: ANY
To: 192.168.169.2
 
But after rule configured the connection still not working, it only works when I add a port forwarding.For HTTP maybe port forwarding is OK, but other services I need to grant access to a specific public IP address, not to everyone. So I need the Firewall rule, but is not working, it always block the request. [code]

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RVS4000 WOL Rule Not Working From WAN (Internet)?

Oct 17, 2012

I picked up an RVS4000 V2 and configured a rule to forward a Magic Packet to an internal system to wake it from a sleep state. Everything was working fine until I update the firmware to v2.0.3.2. I know it's not the the computer as I can wake it from Sleep internally without any problems. One thing I noticed is that the static IP for the computer in Sleep state gets lost in the ARP/RARP Table though the NIC is configured to respond to ARP requests in Sleep.
 
Has anything changed in v2.0.3.2 that requires a different configuration to get Wake on Lan working externally?

My Setup is
 
Computer
P8Z68 Deluxe/Gen3 onboard Intel 82579V NIC
Wake on Magic Packet: ON
Respond to ARP/NS requests without waking system: ON
 RVS4000 V2 (v2.0.3.2)
Mode: Gateway

[code]....

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: WRVS4400N - ACL Rule(s) Causing Sever Slowdown?

Feb 24, 2012

I have a DSL line at work that we use to test external services provided to external users on our primary Internet circuit (Citrix, web applications, etc).  Because this DSL line is for testing only, we want to lock it down so the only destinations allowed through the firewall are our own IP spaces. 
 
I purchased a WRVS4400N for this purpose, thinking I could use the IP based ACL list to create these restrictions.  However, every time I try to create an ACL, the internet slows to a crawl, and many sites don't come up at all.  This occurs even if the ACL rule I add is a simple "allow any any" rule similar to the default rules.
 
Is this a known issue, or am I configuring something incorrectly?  Here's an example of a rule I'm using (IP not real):
 
Action     Service          Source Interface     Source     Destination                                   Time              Day
Allow      All Protocol     LAN                    ANY           1.2.3.0/255.255.255.240*             Any Time       Every Day  
 
I also get the problem with a simple allow from a single IP (mine) to any destination, without any other rules enabled.
 
implementation of the ACL ruleset on these routers?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RVS4000 - Format To Input Into ACL Rule Range

Feb 18, 2012

I have read through the manual. My question is what is the proper format to input into the ACL rule "Range"?  Would as an example work- 192.168.0.1 - 192.169.255.254? Will the range effectively work? Or does it have to be 192.168.0.0 - 192.169.255.255?

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 Portforwarding Overrule Firewall Rule?

Nov 1, 2011

We have a setup where our e-mail server is hosted in-house.Our network is connected through a RV042 gateway. Port 25 is forwarded to our internal e-mail server.Our smtp service should be limited to receiving incomming connections only from 4 specific ip ranges which I set up in the firewall rules.The reason is that all smtp is managed and protected by an external anti-spam/vires provider.
 
However it looks like any computer is able to connect to our port 25 and be forwarded to our e-mail server.Does portforwarding overrule firewall rules - ie. you can not limit access with the firewall if you decide to port forward?Is this a "fixable" situation - or is the RV042 not built for handling this setup?

View 5 Replies View Related

D-Link DIR-615 :: The Rule Is Being Used By Another Rule And Cannot Be Deleted

Jul 27, 2011

I accidentally setup two schedule rules both with the name of "Log". When I highlight either rule, and try to delete either, I get error "The rule is being used by another rule and cannot be deleted"  How do I delete?

View 1 Replies View Related

Zyxel - Ethernet Cable Portal On Laptop Broken / Cannot Access Internet

Jun 20, 2012

I do not have access to internet (I'm on some unsecured internet from around here now, very slow). When I start the internetdiagnostics from windows, he says it's the modem or the connection from laptop, router, modem to internet. However, the lights indicating internet and dsl on the modem are brightly burning and the router shows nothing abnormal too.

I have a WPA2-PSK security, the modem is Zyxel. Also, the ethernetcable portal on my laptop is broken, so I can't do anything non-wireless. My phone has the same problem with this internet, it can get a connection, but no internet.

View 3 Replies View Related

Connection Between Access Point / Router / Or Cable Modem And The Internet Is Broken?

Aug 26, 2012

The detected problem is the connection between my access point, router, or cable modem and the Internet is broken.The network gateway is accessible, but Windows couldn't receive network traffic from the Internet.All other devices (iPad, Xbox, android phone) have no problem connecting to the Internet.Desktop is the only one experiencing the connection issue.

View 1 Replies View Related

Connection Between Access Point / Router Or Cable Modem - Internet Broken

Jan 31, 2012

My laptop died last week and have been using my husbands, which I hate! We had some issues with computer freezing on some webpages or after being on webpages for awhile (like facebook). Yesterday it froze and I could not get it back on. When he got home he did scan disk (which I also did) and got it working after going into safe mode and doing system restore. He said an update had gotten through and messed things up. Anyhow, after he was on it a few hours last night, we lost connection. I figured the crazy weather was the culprit but it has been off all day. Our router is working and connecting but the adapter is not. Also our home phone says there is no line. We have unplugged everything several times, checked to make sure everything is in the right spots, I have even reset the router and rebooted the adapter. I uninstalled and restalled the adapter also. It is now telling me that "the connection between your access point, router, or cable modem and the Internet is broken". The only lights I have on the adapter are power, battery, DS and now the US light is blinking. The online and link lights are not on.

View 3 Replies View Related

Asus RT-N12B1 / Port Forwarding Broken With Installation Of Access Point?

Mar 3, 2012

I recently purchased an Asus RT-N12B1. It has an external hardware switch which allows the router to operate in different modes. I put in access point mode. Then I connected an ethernet cable from a LAN port on my Verizon supplied Actiontec MI424WR-GEN2 E router to a LAN port on the access point and turned off the wireless in the router.

I have dynamic DNS setup and port forwarding setup in the router to forward from port 50000 to 192.168.1.2:22 which is a server plugged into a LAN port on the router. This is no longer working since adding the AP and disabling wireless on the primary router. how to debug?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco AAA/Identity/Nac :: ACS 5.1 Access Rule Selection Sequence

Apr 14, 2011

I just installed a new ACS 5.1 to authenticate wireless PEAP users, so I created an Access policy "WirelessUsers" with identity store being Windows Active directory and all domain users are selected, and create a service rule that dictates that if the authentication protocol is radius, network device belongs to WLC device group, the result service will be "WirelessUsers", so this part worked perfectely, all domain users are able to gain wireless access via their DOMAIN/usernames and domain passwords. Now I want ACS local indentity store users (those local usernames can be the same or different from their AD usernames) to be able to manage those controllers, so I created another access policy "DeviceAdminUsers" with identity store being local users, another service rule which says that if the authentication protocol is radius, network device belongs to WLC device group, the result service will be "DeviceAdminUsers". The problem is that with the setup, whenenve when I try to SSH to WLC, ACS always put me in "WirelessUsers" access policy, even the login name does not have DOMAIN pre-pended or the login name simly does not exist in AD.  if I put the second rule in front of first rule, I am able to authenticate with ACS local username/password and gain access to WLC, but wireless users will fail to authenticate, because ACS is trying to put regular wiress users in "DeviceAdminUsers" access policy. I would expect if username does not exist in AD, ACS should proceed with next rule. Similar requirement was easily achieved in ACS 3.3.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA5520 - Access-Rule ASDM Ver 6.2(1) Vs 5.2(3)

Apr 17, 2011

I am creating access rule on a ASA5520 running ASA 8.2 (1) and ASDM 6.2(1) and found that the GUI has less option then when creating access rule on a ASA5505 running ASA 7.2 (3) and ASDM 5.2(3) (see attachment). Is there an option that enables me to get the same configuration options on the ASA5520 running ASA 8.2 (1) and ASDM 6.2(1) as I have on the ASA5505 running ASA 7.2 (3) and ASDM 5.2(3).

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: PIX600 - Correlate Access Rule

Oct 13, 2011

I have a PIX with 600 active access rules but many rules arent't in use. A lot of the rules aren't necessary anymore but I don't know what they are. How to know what rules are working?

View 4 Replies View Related

Linksys Wireless Router :: WRTP54G Route Table - Broken Internet Access

May 2, 2011

I know that WRTP54G is a voip device, but it is router as well and my problem is related to routing part.I cannot access public internet servers with IP in subnet 2.0.0.0 / 8 and 1.0.0.0 / 8. In the 2.0.0.0 / 8 subnet are some akamai cdn servers (yes, the fbcdn .After some time I've found, that routing table in wrtp54g contains also entries:
 
1.0.0.0                 0.0.0.0                 255.0.0.0                 LAN&Wireless2.0.0.0                 0.0.0.0                 255.0.0.0                 LAN&Wireless

which cannot be deleted. It looks like someone wanted to filter dark space when the router was developed.Is there any way, to get rid of it? I've restored to factory defaults, no change. Firmware version is 3.1.27.ETSI

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5520 Access Rule Duplicating Existing One

Jul 3, 2011

After upgrading to 8.4(2) and ASDM 6.4(5) I seem to have an extra access rule duplicating an existing rule, this is only visable through the ASDM. When using the CLI you can't see this duplicate rule.
 
I therfore get the following warning everytime I make a config change using the ASDM [code] If I delete this rule it returns everytime I launch the ASDM!
 
I also have extra config under Firewall>Configuration>Public Servers that I didn't have before. If I delete it, again it returns.

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco AAA/Identity/Nac :: ACS 5.3 Cannot Create Default Network Access Authorization Rule

Jun 10, 2013

when I click 'Create...' under Access Policies > Default Network Access > Authorization, and then press the 'OK' button, it says 'Please configure at least 1 condition.' However I have no way to configure conditions as the 'Conditions' text is just bold text and not a link or any sort of configurable area. If I go to 'Customize' on the bottom right and add conditions to the right list box, I still have no options when I press Create. Also, the 'green light' next to Default Network Access is grey with a line through it. This is the most cryptic system I have ever used

View 12 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved