Cisco Routers :: RVS4000 - How To Add Vlan Wi-Fi
Apr 20, 2013
Ive set up a rvs4000 with two vlans, one as a bussiness network and the other as a guest network. Everything works fine and the networks can not see each other. I would like to add wifi and I would like to do so with keeping both networks separate. I have a used 1130AG access point and was wondering if I could use this single AP for both networks. If so, how would I go about doing so? Is there a better suited AP for my needs?
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Apr 24, 2012
I have a RVS4000 and I am going to configure vlan in the near future. Among all other configurations sent by the internet provider company is this one :
Firewall NAT :
from x.x.2.0/24 to 0.0.0.0/24 should be NAT
from x.x.2.0/24 to x.x.0.0/21 should not be NAT
From all the other configurations, this one is not clear to me. Can this configuration be done on a RVS4000 and where can it be done.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 1, 2010
I bought a RVS4000 Router last week. I configured two VLAN's (beside of the default one), VLAN ID 120 and VLAN ID 130. I configured an IP in the LAN section for both of them (192.168.120.1 and 192.168.130.1).
I then configured port 1-3 to be in VLAN ID 120 (Untagged) and port 4 to be the Trunk (VLAN ID 120 Tagged and VLAN ID 130 Tagged). The port 4 I connected a Cisco SLM224G. There I configured these two VLAN's too, and configured the uplink port as Trunk as well. The two network seem to be properly switched: I have access to 130 Hosts directly on the VLAN ID 130, and the other VLAN ID 120, I have access on all hosts connected to that VLAN ID as well (both, on the switch and the three ports on the router). On Layer 3, the RVS4000 is configured to route between the VLAN's. But I cant ping hosts on the other network! I configured the Router to be the default gateway... I think the source of that problem is the next one:
I can't ping from the Routers Maintainance Page to a host connected on Port 1-3 of the Switch (which is configured as VLAN ID 120 untagged). I reseted the router, and tested this simple use case again: Created two VLAN's, defined Port 2 to be in one of them, setted the IP's properly (192.168.120.1 for the Router on that VLAN), but stil, I cant ping from the Router to Host on that VLAN (Router=>192.168.120.10)! The other way around works (Host=>192.168.120.1)
The Routers Configuration:
WAN: PPPoE (works)
LAN: VLAN ID 1: 192.168.1.1 no DHCP
VLAN ID 120: 192.168.120.1 no DHCP
VLAN ID 130: 192.168.130.1 no DHCP
[code]....
Wiresharks shows me no ARP requests on that interface too... The product seems not to work porperly when I configure a port to be in a VLAN untagged, and try to ping to a host connected to that interface.
I have Firmware 3.1.0.0 (Website says 3.0.5.0 is the newest...?)
View 7 Replies
View Related
Mar 6, 2012
Is there any way to granularly allow hosts from one vlan to be able to access another vlan with Inter-VLAN routing DISABLED?Can the use of an ACL override the setting?In general I don't want any traffic between VLAN's but there are 2 hosts on one VLAN that I would want to allow access to a server on another VLAN.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 7, 2012
I have an RVS4000 version 1 with firmware 1.3.3.5. I have two VLAN's setup:
VLAN1 - 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0
VLAN10 - 192.168.10.0/255.255.255.0
Ports 1 through 3 are configured for VLAN1 and right now I have one PC connected directly to port 1 and nothing connected to ports 2 or 3. Port 4 is configured for VLAN10 with a managed switch (also configured on VLAN10) connected to it. There are 4 wireless access points connected to the switch.
On the Setup->Advanced Routing page of the RVS4000 I have the Inter-VLAN Routing option set to Disabled. Yet when I connect to one of the wireless access points and receive a 192.168.10.x address, I can ping the PC connected to port 1 which has a 192.168.1.x address.
Also, I would like VLAN10 to not have access to the Management GUI on the RVS4000.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 16, 2013
There are 5 VLAN's and all can communicate through all the different subnets, but VLAN5 can not communicate to the RVS 4000.
VLAN Smart Port set to switch and router - this is not working What Smart Port configuration should be set up to talk to the LAN port on a RVS4000?
VPN is set up and connected, but when trying to connect to the client can not connect to remote networks.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 23, 2012
I have a Cisco RVS400 router at my restaurant. In lan ports 1-3 on the router, I have plugged in my point-of-sale computers.Into LAN port 4 I have plugged my wireless access point that is in my dining room.
The wireless access is there ONLY for the customers to access the internet. I want to make sure the customers cannot access my company data, can this be accomplished through the use of VLANs ? If so, how do I do this? All of my devices are configured for dhcp..if that's relevant.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 18, 2010
I'm trying to connect through a VPN to RVS4000 router that I have VLAN'ed into two seperate networks 192.168.1.x (default) and 192.168.77.x. When i connect with the QuickVPN Client, I have no problems seeing devices on the 192.168.1.x network but i can't see the 192.168.77.x devices; so i'm assuming that the QuickVPN client software puts me on the default network and not the "77" network. Thing is, i only want to VPN into the "77" network and not the 192.168.1.x network.
Will QuickVPN allow me to do this? If not how do I VPN into the 192.168.77.x network?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 8, 2012
I have an RVS4000 setup with a VLAN to a wireless "guest" network, guest network is 192.168.1.x, internal network is 10.0.0.x both have Internet access, and cannot see each other, exactly what I wanted. The only problem is that either from the internal network or the guest network I can no longer access the Remote Web Workplace - [URL] or Outlook Web Access [URL] fails with page not found. Internally I can access via \server emote and \serverexchange but of course this does not work for the guest network. We have Small Business Server 2003. External access if fine.
View 0 Replies
View Related
Sep 11, 2011
I have 2 internet connections in my office one via Verizon Fios and another one via the local cable company. On the fios connection I have an RV042 VPN router and on the Cable company connection I have an rvs4000 router, I would like to know if there is a way I can connect the 2 so I can share a printer I have on one of the 2 networks from the other network without using the VPN feature, like via an ethernet cable connected between the 2 and some kind of static route maybe?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jan 12, 2013
How do I submit an RFE (Request For Enhancement) to the Cisco SBR team to encourage them to implement the missing support for VLAN to VLAN firewall rules that was available in the RVS4000 (See [URL]) and that was supposedly added to a beta release of the RV220W firmware (See [URL])?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 16, 2012
I have an RVS4000 running V2.0.2.7 firmware that gives me an "Invalid Character(s) Found" error message when I try to edit an existing ACL.
I'm trying to deploy 57 of these routers and would like to be able to use a pre-built config dropped onto each router.
I initially planned on editing the exported config with a find&replace for my local LAN addresses. Since that didn't work the next reasonable solution would be to edit the ACL list (much more tedious, but still better than hand-entering every ACL on all 57 devices).
when this bug will be addressed? Alternatively, if there is an offline configuration editing tool I would be one happy camper to have it!
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 3, 2013
I have an RVS4000, not installed. How can I tell from the unit or the packaging that it is a v1 or a v2, without installing and switching it on (which I don't want to do now) ? Are v1 branded Linsys and v2 Cisco ? Can you tell from the date on the package (mine says copyright 2011) ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 4, 2011
I don't know if my vendor mislead me, but I need to do this: There is a public subnet in my office, not a 192.168.x.x, but a real Public IP.The reason is that we do VOIP and those are only servers. I installed a RVS 4000 in that location, and assigned a PUBLIC Ip to BOTH the WAN and LAN, since when I connect from outside, using either QickVPN or another identical router, I need to be assigned one of the PUBLIC Ip's on the remote LAN. That is the whole idea of the project, to locate servers remotely and make them use our set of PUBLIC IP's. Well, so far I cannot connect either with the Quick VPN client, or using the VPN Wizard. It goes and creates the tunnel, without error, but when I click test, it fails.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 15, 2012
We have backup and other traffic over our vpn which is affecting our ip phone service between two sites. Our consultant suggested implementing QOS over the VPN to give the phone traffic priority. Is this possible with the rvs4000. Is there any good source saying how to do it. Is the setup of the QOS on this router similar to another router where this has been discussed.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 19, 2012
I have problem with bandwidth management on my RVS4000.
That is the way how i done it:
All traffic (TCP & UDP on all ports)
IP range 192.168.0.2 - 192.168.0.2 (My IP adress)
Guaranted download speed 1kbps
Maximum download speed 5000kbps
after saving setting and rebooting router I have maximum download speed on my PC 12000kbps, Why QOS doesnt work ?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 11, 2012
I am getting ready to setup an RVS4000 so we can use the VPN functionality of it, but I am not quite sure of the correct way to integrate it into our network though. I do not need site to site, just the client portion of it for a few salesmen/off site people to use. I have never used or setup a VPN before, so I'm learning everything as I go along.
We are in the middle of switching our ISP and I am waiting to set this up until the new service is live so I can test it prior to moving the rest of the company to the new ISP.
We are switching to Comcast, and will have 5 static IP's available to use. Currently, the firewall does all our NAT and is the forward facing device on our network. I would like to leave the firewall in place (although I am setting up a new firewall for the new internet connection) and have th RVS 4000 sit behind it and receive VPN traffic from a WAN to LAN rule We currently have a 192.168.100.0/24 network.
Do I need to setup another /24 network for the VPN to function behind (and still have access to the 100.X network), or is there a way to allow everyone who connects to receive a 100.X ip address from our DHCP server. I'm not sure how to set everything up with the WAN/LAN connections on the RVS4000 to acheive this.
We are running a domain on a 2008R2 server. The clients will be using laptops that are already part of the domain, if that will make a difference.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 15, 2011
I'm trying to setup a VPN tunnel between a Cisco RVS4000 on our side and a Cisco ASA5520, to connect a machine on our local network to a test server on the target side.
We have all the settings setup correctly and the tunnel is up and running, however, our local machine can't connect/ping to their server. I've tried a trace route both from the machine and from the RVS4000 itself, and they both get stuck after getting past 192.168.1.1. Is there any routing or NAT-ing that I need to do on our router? Or is there a problem somewhere else?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Aug 8, 2009
I'm having an issue with a Linksys RVS4000 which doesn't appear to be behaving as I think it should.I need to forward a port (Single Port Forwarding) through to an internal NAT host. However, I only want that host/port to be accessible from one host on the internet, for security reasons.
I have created the port forwarding entry and this works fine. I then created two rules in IP Based ACL - one to block all access to that port from the WAN interface and one to allow access from a single host.
However, it appears that when a port forwarding entry is added, it will completely bypass the ACL and allow all traffic for that port/host by default.Is this the correct behaviour?
Firmware version is v1.2.11
View 12 Replies
View Related
Sep 13, 2011
I'm currently dealing with a weird problem on a Cisco RVS4000. I'm trying to connect to a IPSEC VPN Gateway (NETASQ) located on the LAN side of the RVS4000. I'm using Green bow vpn client on the WAN side of the RVS4000. Basically I'm trying to get through the RVS.My VPN config is OK because i tested it on the LAN side of the RVS.
The RVS is configured like this: NO VPN configured.
Block WAN Request :OFF
FIREWALL,IPS,DDOS are OFF
NAT forwarding on for UDP 500 and 4500 directed from the wan to the ip of the VPN gateway. Seems right because iv managed to do this with other routers (different brands) on another site.I've wire sharked my vpn client and i keep getting ICMP destination unreachable (PORT UNREACHABLE) after my ISAKMP launching packet.Can the RVS nat these ports ?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 11, 2012
I've been trying to disect this problem for a few months to no avail. The router allows me to connect to outside FTP only when IPS is enabled. The moment I disable the IPS functoin, the connection hangs and does not connect to a server. Reason I'd like to keep IPS disabled it is because it's eating up half of bandwith when enabled.RVS4000
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 20, 2011
I have a Netgear GSM7248R switch with 5 different Vlans including th management Vlan. Each of the vlans are connected to my layer 3 switch for routing. I want to access the management vlan form any of my Vlans so my layer two switch can be detected by my snmp manager.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 8, 2012
I have a Cisco RVS4000 with Port 1 as a trunk connection to a Cisco SF300 switch. Port 1 on the router is configured 1untag,2tag,3tag,4ag. When connected directly to the router I can connect to the switches management IP. I would like to reach the switch remotely. I have set up DDNS and can access the router and I have have set a specific port to forward to port 80 on the switches management IP but this does not work. Should I not be able to Port Forward to the switch across VLAN 1?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 23, 2011
I have an RVS4000 with FTP download issues. I have the latest v1.3.3.5 software and the latest ISP (1.5). Regardless of any settings changes, my FTP downloads always timeout. I have tried a new basic router and had no issues, so it is not the PC, FTP software, or the ISP. I have even put my PC into the DMZ and still no resolution.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 1, 2013
Few months back I had purchased this Router. But I did not use it till last week. Since the time I have installed it, it does freeze often (between 5 to 30 hours).
I can connect to devices within the subnet, but not elswhere. I have to remove the power and plug it back for it to respond. I have updated the firmware to the latest one that was on the Cisco site.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 17, 2010
Does the Cisco SB RVS4000 router support 802.1x authentication for the WAN port?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 27, 2012
I have firmware version 2.0.2.7. I've down loaded the firmware upgrade utility ver 1.3, and do not see a read me or help file. I've disconnected the cables as directed, but recive a 'broadcast error' and a 'browse device error'
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 9, 2013
I am trying to configure my RVS4000 to create my church's small network. I want to connect my internet DSL router on the WAN port and also segment my network with VLANs on the 4 LAN ports. I have port 4 connected to a wireless access point which is in VLAN1 for an open wireless network for any church member to access the internet through. I have a church server, printer and second access point on ports 1-3 in VLAN 34. All ports are untagged. I want the devices on VLAN34 which need confidentiality to be secure from the devices connecting to the internet from VLAN1 for open access but both VLANs need access to the internet..
My open wireless AP in VLAN1 has access to the internet on the WAN port.
None of my devices in VLAN34 have access to the internet. I have tried using inter-VLAN routing but that made operation worse so I disabled it.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 21, 2013
I work for a company that recently upgraded to a Cisco RVS4000 router in place of a failing D-Link router. I configured the RVS4000 to utilize the same address space as the D-Link previously did (192.168.0.0 Network Address, 255.255.255.0 Subnet Mask, RVS4000 in Gateway Mode with IP Address 192.168.0.1, DHCP Scope from 192.168.0.101 - 200 managed by the RVS4000) before installing it on the network. I powered down the D-Link as well as the cable modem, then all of the workstations in the office. Then, I installed the RVS4000, powered up the cable modem, and once it was ready, powered on the RVS4000.
When devices connect, the RVS4000 is assigning them an IP address in the 192.168.1.0/24 subnet, instead of the 192.168.0.0/24 subnet. I have verified that the RVS4000's GUI is showing the correct settings, but connected devices are not picking up addresses from the correct address pool. In troubleshooting, I went to each workstation, released and renewed their IP addresses, and they picked up addresses in the correct subnet. I thought everything was solved, but the next day, the same problem resurfaced.
I left the DHCP lease time at the defaul value "0", which according to the unit's documentation should correspond to a 24-hour lease period. I suspect this is why I had to renew the clients' IP addresses the next day (today), but I still don't get why the RVS4000 wants to give out addresses in the 192.168.1.0/24 scope. Could this be a holdover from the factory settings?
Additional Information: I did not set up any VLANs on the network and the office only requires one subnet as there are not a lot of devices connected, nor do we need the traffic segragated. The VPN functions of the RVS4000 work fine. Using the QuickVPN utility, I can access the network and resources on the network remotely without issue.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 31, 2010
I am having problems with the RVS4000 ver 1. I cannot download files from the web. Firmware is up to date. As an example, if I try to download from pdf995's site, I get a "page cannot be displayed error. If I try to download current files for my flight planning software (like charts, etc.), the download hangs and never completes. I have bypassed the RVS4000 and connected directly to the broadband router and there are no problems. We have a 15MB cable connection.Follow-up - It appears the issue is file size. At pdf995's site, downloading a 2.5MB file works, but the 9 MB file does not. The file sizes for the flight planning software are rather large - 100-200 MB, and they hang as well. Connecting directly to the cable router does not cause this problem. The RVS4000 is set for Gateway mode.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Aug 18, 2011
My new RVS4000 (2.0.2.7) connects the WAN via PPoE with dynamic IP which is held at DynDNS and normally I see the RVS4000 via a router-to-router-VPN. That works fine so far, but every "some" days the router looses WAN connection (and with ist VPN). When this happens, last DynDNS-update is hours ago, so it didn`t reconnect. Looking on the routers site, the LAN is fully functional for clients that have got their DHCP-Information. New clients don`t get DHCP-Info (IP-address, DNS), both do not have internet access. The router`s WAN-summary shows, that it thinks to be "CONNECTED" but with empty WAN-IP and DNS entries. Klicking "DISCONNECT" and then "CONNECT" again solves the problem so far. The loss of connection is not the periodic break from the IPC, which is correctly identified and reconnected as configured. I wanted to trace the problem with the log, but there is also a bug. It stops logging at some time completely - neither email-log nor local log, so I never happend to be lucky to hit the point of loss of connection. Also the local log provides a first and next pages, but the next pages are always empty - not really useful.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 15, 2012
The local router is behind a fiber firewall/router; the rvs4000's ext ip is thus 192.168.1.2, not visible from the net. The firewall/router is a dyn ip, with a dyn dns name mapping to it. The remote (some NetGear thing) is also dyn dns, but it is not behind a firewall.
I want to cook a vpn from the local lan subnet to the remote lan subnet.
It worked fine when both ends were NetGear.
I think it would be ok if somehow I could thell the rvs4000 that the local Security Gateway Type be just FQDN; it can't be IP+FQDN because the remote end doesn't know anything about that kind of thing; it can do IP or FQDN or a couple other confusing things.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 3, 2012
We are an A/V integrator and AMX shop and provide our clients with support through the use of VPN tunnels from our RV042 router to their mostly RVS4000 routers.Support is provided through access of remote site equipment using VNC, Telnet, FTP, etc. from multiple PC's at our main office.Netbios is not turned on, but the remote sites have the ability to access equipment on our local LAN should they know our private IP address range.Is there any way to limit the acces from the remote sites back to our LAN while maintaining our access to the equipment on their LAN?I know that one can limt the IP address range on on end of the VPN, but I would like to limit the ability of remote sites to gain "any" access to our LAN. If there's any way to just prevent all traffic from an IP address range on the remote site, that would also do.
View 1 Replies
View Related
