Cisco Routers :: Site To Site VPN Tunnels From A RV042G Router?
Dec 15, 2012
I have an issue with 2 site to site VPN tunnels from a RV042G router. The issue is for both VPN tunnels is that in the logs, it is showing that when the RV042G router is trying to establish the tunnel, it is getting a response from the remote gateway internal address and not the Public address of the remote gateways. On the remote gateways I have other site to site VPN's terminating fine and the tunnels are passing traffic. I only have an issue with the RV042. On the VPN Tunnel page it shows for both tunnels waiting for connection. This is an output from the log of the RV042G
Dec 17 15:19:48 2012VPN Log(g2gips0) #2174: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to 203.43.XX.XXX:500 Dec 17 15:19:48 2012VPN Log(g2gips0) #2174: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Receive Main Mode 6th packet Dec 17 15:19:48 2012VPN Log(g2gips0) #2174: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Receive Main Mode 6th packet Dec 17 15:19:48 2012VPN Log(g2gips0) #2174: Peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '126.0.21.52' Dec 17 15:19:48 2012VPN Log(g2gips0) #2174: we require peer to have ID '203.43.XX.XXX', but peer declares '126.0.21.52' Dec 17 15:19:48 2012VPN Log(g2gips0) #2174: we require peer to have ID '203.43.XX.XXX', but peer declares '126.0.21.52' Dec 17 15:19:48 2012VPN Log(g2gips0) #2174: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to 203.43.XX.XXX:500 Dec 17 15:39:50 2012VPN Log(g2gips1) #2192: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Receive Main Mode 6th packet Dec 17 15:39:50 2012VPN Log(g2gips1) #2192: Peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '10.1.202.65' Dec 17 15:39:50 2012VPN Log(g2gips1) #2192: we require peer to have ID '203.47.XXX.XX', but peer declares '10.1.202.65' Dec 17 15:39:50 2012VPN Log(g2gips1) #2192: we require peer to have ID '203.47.XXX.XX', but peer declares '10.1.202.65' Dec 17 15:39:50 2012VPN Log(g2gips1) #2192: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to 203.47.XXX.XX:500
VPN tunnel terminating on 203.43.XX.XXX is a Checkpoint firewall running R70 software version?VPN tunnel terminating on 203.47.XXX.XX is a Cisco ASA 5510 running ASA 8.2.4 software?As stated above, I have other VPN tunnels working fine. This RV042 is a replacement router as the original router suffered a power surge.
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Sep 4, 2012
How many [concurrent and maximum] roaming user tunnel and site to site vpn tunnels are supported in ISR 2921 ..
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 15, 2012
I wanted to know the maximum VPN client sessions (using the Cisco VPN client) and Site-to-Site VPN tunnels that I can connect to my ASA 5505 simultaneously.
In other words, if I have x VPN clients and y Site-to-Site tunnels, at any time, does x + y have to be <= 10 (Total VPN Peers)? If yes, can I upgrade to the security plus license to increase the Total VPN Peers to 25?
Licensed features for this platform:
Maximum Physical Interfaces : 8
VLANs : 3, DMZ Restricted
Inside Hosts : Unlimited
Failover : Disabled
VPN-DES : Enabled
[Code]...
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 4, 2012
Question on ASA VPN tunnels. I have one ASA 5510 in our corporate office, I have two subnets in our corporate office that are configured in the ASA in a Object group. I have a site to site IPSEC tunnel already up and that has been working. I am trying to set up another site to site IPSEC tunnel to a different location that will need to be setup to access the same two subnets. I'm not sure if this can be setup or not, I think I had a problem with setting up two tunnels that were trying to connect to the same subnet but that was between the same two ASA's. Anyways the new tunnel to a new site is not coming up and I want to make sure it is not the subnet issue. The current working tunnel is between two ASA 5510's, the new tunnel we are trying to build is between the ASA and a Sonicwall firewall.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 24, 2013
I am trying to establish routing between two Site to Site vpn tunnels, both of which are terminating on the same outside interface of my Cisco ASA.
find attached Network Diagram for the same. All Firewalls used are Cisco ASA 5520.
Both VPN tunnels between Point A and Point B, Point B and Point C too are up. I have enabled Same security level intra interface permit command also.
How do i enable traffic originating from LAN Subnets behind Point A to reach LAN Subnets behind Point C without having to create a Seperate tunnel between Point A and Point C
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 15, 2011
I have a setup with a pair off ASA5510 on the central site, and approx 20 sites with ASA5505.A couple off network are configured as site to site tunnels to every remote site.Its very stable, but the last year or so ocassionally one of the tunnels go one-way.Just like one of the nat exeptions suddenly stops working.I can see the remote side transmitting packets, but no answer.Central site is running 8.22, want to upgrade but have to mount more RAM.The only cure i have found is to reboot the central pair off ASA5510, not very popular as all 20 tunnels goes down.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 8, 2013
I have vpn-concentrator on vyatta, 8 cisco 881w and 2 cisco 1941 with vpn site-to-site connected to vyatta. They all are in one ISP's vlan native L2 level.
I user pre-shared key, aes128 and md5 hash.
Traffic goes both sides, everything is okay, i strated cacti monitor of traffic and CPU, started netflow analyzer.
Sometimes one ipsec connection between any of branches go down, it doesn't have any extra CPU load, not more then 20-30%, no huge traffic but somewhy i recieve phone call like "i can't reach server" i check on vyatta - tunnels are down with one router, i do "reset vpn ipsec-peer N" and everything is ok.
I mentioned that when I added "keepalive periodic 10" on ciscos, tunnels started go down more often, for exmaple usually I recieve 1-2 phone calls during a day, whan I added this command, i started to recieve 4-5 phonecalls from branches.
it's always random tunnel down branch, today it was one 1941 and one 881w, yesturday it was 3 881w during all day
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 17, 2012
I recently replaced my RV042 with an RV042G. I did an export of the RV042 Config and used the Config Migration Tool to upgrade the file to v3 (I had an old v1 RV042). When I first logged in to the RV042G it was quite happy and I imported the config file successfully.After installing the RV042G in my system it fired up and worked perfectly. Unfortunately when I now try to log in via the web interface it comes up with 'Invalid Site Certificate' each time. I've tried importing the certificate but that does not work as it is flagged as invalid.All I can assume is I have either imported the origional RV042 certificate as part of the config or importing the config has corrupted the original RV042G site certificate. I assume this is a generic issue and not specific to the RV042G as I have had this problem before but cannot remember how I solved it.The bottom line would be a hard reset and load all my settings manually but I can't spare the time just now.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 27, 2013
I'm setting up a site-to-site VPN between two offices, Site A uses a Cisco RV110W VPN Router with a static WAN IP and local IP 192.168.1.0/24 while Site B I have set up with a Belkin N300 VPN router which also has a Static WAN IP and the local IP is set to 192.168.2.0/24
I'm able to ping from Site B (192.168.2.xxx) to Site A, however I can't communicate from Site A back to Site B.how I could go about troubleshooting this? I've been scouring the internet for 3 days trying to get to the bottom of this with no luck.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 11, 2013
We recently purchased an SRP527W router because of its capability to configure site-site VPN tunnels. The configuration of IKE and IPSEC is working and the tunnel comes up but the problem is that the router is passing our internal IP addresses through the tunnel. The remote end we are connecting to requires us to hide all traffic behind one IP address which would ideally be our external static IP address from our ISP.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 19, 2011
As you can see i have problems with connecting 2 SRP521W together for an VPN tunnel. I tried as much as I can but now i dont know what to do or how and where is the mistake? the connection between these two devices was there last week, after weekend (nothing changed in configs) the connection suddenly was interrupted, without any reason or warning. another day it worked again and 20 mins later connection was dead again...and now it wont establish at all.. here are some screenshots from the vpnconfigs of my devices. one has a static IP the otherone uses FQDN. These are the IKE policies: Here the IPsec Policies: and the GRE policies:
View 10 Replies
View Related
Sep 6, 2011
I have an ASA5505 running which is on a static IP. I have just got an SRP527W for a remote worker and want to create a site-to-site VPN into the ASA. I have a number of other router of non-cisco brand which just all dial-in and connect no problem.
On other routers I have been abloe to specify the DDNS hostname in the VPN setup so that the ASA can identify it. I'm not sure how I setup the SRP527 to connect to the ASA.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 2, 2012
i'm trying to create a VPN IPSEC link between 2 offices. The VPN link is created, and i can communicate but only one way. Clients in Office B seems to have routing problem.
Details :
Office A :
- SRP527W router.
- Client Network : 192.168.0.0 / 24
[Code].....
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 18, 2011
Can I use a single Public IP address for both Internet access and site to site vpn access?If not, can I configure the RV220W as a bridge and still use it via another gateway configured for vpn passthrough as a VPN appliance/server on the LAN?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 13, 2013
Is it possible to have a site-to-site IPSEC tunnel between 2 identical RV110W routers?I basically want one of them to initiate a secure tunnel with the second so that computers from one router subnet see the computers from the other router subnet.
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 19, 2013
the RV110W IPSEC site-to-site tunnel, are there necessary 2 x public IPs for it to work, or only 1 public IP is enough? [code]If it works with 1 public ip, the "CLIENT" RV110W configuration should be straightforward (in Advanced VPN SetupRemote Endpoint i fill in the dyndns address?), but how do i setup "HOST" RV110W?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 6, 2012
We have successfully establish a site-to-site vpn, but we have some difficulties when PPTP users try to access the remote network linked by this tunnel. LAN users can access the remote network without problem, but users who are connected remotly to the lan (PPTP) can't access computer on the remote network. Is there a way to allow PPTP user to access the remote network ? Adding a route ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2011
I'm installing a new SRP547W for a client and am having trouble setting up a site-to-site vpn. They are using the WAN1 ADSL interface for their internet connection. When I add a sub interface to it I am unable to see the 'Connection Type' drop down like I can see on a WAN2 ethernet sub interface. I have followed the instructions on page 29 provided here: how I can get a a site to site vpn set up on this router using either PPTP or L2TP over the ADSL interface.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 29, 2012
Is there a way to set up a Site-to-site VPN between RV042 & Cisco 2911? I "googled" this and obtained a document, but it is not regarding Cisco 2911: [URL]
Routers are needed to setup it successfully. I have tried on both routers several configuration steps, no success...
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 23, 2011
I have two Cisco RV220W routers and I would like to realy DHCP from the home office to the remote office accross the IPsec Tunnel. Is this possible and if so how?
I have already gone into the IPv4 LAN (Local Network) settings on the remote router and set the DHCP mode to "DHCP Relay" providing the internal ip address of the home office router as the remote DHCP server.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 9, 2013
I am considering to buy two RV180Ws and place them on two separate locations. But before buying I would like to make sure that the units meets my requirements. Lets call the locations A and B. I would like to connect location A with full network access to location B. But at the same time I would like to have that location B also gets full access to the network at location A.Besides this I would like to be able to connect to one of the networks from remote with my laptop.Preferably all connections should be made using IPSEC and not PPTP.I would like to know if it is possible to make such a configuration, and eventually if there is a smarter way to do e.g. only letting clients connect to location A or B and granting them access to all ressources at both location A and B from there.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 22, 2013
I am having a heck of a time configuring 2 RV180W's to establish an IPSEC VPN tunnel. I have some experience at this with other Cisco products (RV042/082) but I can't get these beasties to cooperate.One RV180W is at a client's office and there are to be 1x RV180W and 1x RV120W located at 2 employee's residences.The office has a Static IP and the homes have dymamic IP.I figured I would config the units in the homes to be initators and connect to the office where the static IP is. This is failing for me so far. Any example (screenshot?) of a config where this is working? The firmware on the RV180W's I am trying to configure first are current.I even tried testing from my office (where I have multiple static IPs available) from RV180W here to RV180W at client's office (static at both ends) and I can't get a tunnel to come up. Obviously I am missing the boat at some point in the setup.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 22, 2012
I have a site to site VPN tunnel configured between a rv220w and rv180. Everything works fine going from site to site on LAN connections. I'm now trying to tie in the remote site wireless (rv220w side) by pointing radius to my ACS server which is on the other side of the site-to-site tunnel but it seems as though it doesnt route across the site to site tunnel. If i put a radius server on the local lan on the remote site that authentication works fine. I have confirmed there are no ACL problems. the RV220W capable of using a radius server across the vpn tunnel?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 21, 2011
I'd like to create a site-to-site vpn between an SRP527 and an other vpn gateway. The problem is i don't see how to route all traffic from the local network (network defined by the lan ip interface of the SRP527) to the other vpn gateway? It seems to be only possible to define the destination network (accessible via the vpn) with ip/mask (but only for "small" network: for exemple i tried with 10.2.0.0 mask 255.255.0.0 and it's ok but i tried with 10.0.0.0 mask 255.0.0.0 -> it's not working. I obtain the message "invalid ip")
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 13, 2012
I want to connect two sites through a VPN tunnel, such that each machine can access all others, regardless of which site they're located.
The two sites have a VDSL connexion with dynamic public IP addresses. Unfortunately, our ISP does not offer static IP addresses with VDSL connexions.
I plan to do the following : install two RV 120W routers, one at each site, right after the VDSL modemconfigure the modems in bridge mode, such that the 120Ws get directly the WAN IP address and trafficuse DynDNS to assign domain names (site1.dyndns.org and site2.dyndns.org) to each siteassign different subnets to each site (ie 192.168.1/24 for site 1 and 192.168.2/24 for site 2)configure a VPN tunnel in gateway mode using the FQDN (site.dyndsn.org and site2.dyndns.org) of each site on both routers, with corresponding remote subnets
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 26, 2013
I have 2 Cisco routers , 1841 and 2811 , I need to setup site to site VPN , but i dont now some how it just does not seems to be working ,
Find attached the Configuration along with the
<----- 172.31.1.0/24----- DG:172.31.1.1>Cisco 2811<Dialer1 -----//Internet//----------Dialer1>Cisco1841---< DG:10.236.5.254-------------- 10.236.5.0/24--->
Find attached command executed on each router in the below order
1) show ver
2) Show run
3) show logging
4) show crypto ipsec sa
5) show crypto isakmp sa
Debugging enabled on routers are
1)Debug Crypto Isakmp
2) Debug Crypto Ipsec.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 28, 2012
I have several sa520 appliances, and one of them came with the 2.1.72 firmware and it works perfect... with all others I upgrade to 2.1.71 (because I was not able to find 2.1.72) that is the latest posted in the CISCO download area.So, is there any way to get 2.1.72 ?With the 2.1.71 the VPN Site 2 Site works fine some time, but later it disconnect and it does not connect until I disable /enable the VPN.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 21, 2013
I am trying to configure my network so that VPN traffic is only routed to a single physical port on the RV180 or to a certain subset of devices on a network.
I have a site-to-site vpn setup in a home office and am connecting to the corporate network. The user has a couple of devices running on the home network that need access to the corporate network.
We are hoping to leave his PC accessible to his home network as well as the corporate network, but restrict other devices from accessing the vpn.
I beleive I could do it by playing with the subnet but I can't get my head around it.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jan 23, 2012
I am building a site to site VPN from our headquarters to a customer. I am using an ASA 5520. The customer is using Cisco 3945 routers. The customer has two VPN termination points. The customer requests that we make one of their termination points the primary VPN connection and make the other termination point the backup in the event that the primary VPN fails. How do I configure this on the ASA? Does the below configuration fulfill this goal?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 8, 2011
I have problem with setting up the port forwarding on the VPN between two cisco 527w.
Scenario where a Site to Site VPN tunnel has been established between Site A and Site B; a Printer behind Site B needs to be accessed by using the WAN IP address of Site A. As the picture above:
- From site A, I am able to ping printer and access to printer locally and via 120.146.x.x with port forwarding setup on site A to the printer.
- From site B, I am able to ping site A gateway but not able to access to the printer via 120.146.x.x. The printer can be access via 129.203.x.x if the port forwarding is setup on site B to the printer.
Does Cisco SRP 527w support port forwarding over site to site VPN from site A to printer on site B?
View 15 Replies
View Related
Mar 25, 2013
I have no problem configuring both devices to successfully connect when the juniper firewall isn't in the picture. But due to policy; the RV042 at our main site must sit behind the firewall.
I've got the port forwarding setup but I'm not able to connect. I know I"m missing some configuration on the RV042 but I can't think of it! I've attached a GIF to give an example of both setups.
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 18, 2012
I have a requirement to create a site to site vpn tunnel on ASA 5510 from a remote site to my HO, ihave already other site-to-site tunnels are up and running on the ASA.The issue is my remote site has got the network address which falls in one of the subnet used in HO(192.168.10.0/24).My requirement is only My remote site need to accees couple of my servers in HO which is in 192.168.200.0/24 subnet.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 28, 2012
So I just got a couple of Cisco RV180 routers that I am trying to setup a VPN link between the two. Both have their own static IP addresses on the WAN side, and so I used the Basic VPN wizard to define the public addresses for each other, use a pre-shared key, and set the local IP address ranges in the routers in the following layout: Router ALocal: 172.16.0.0/24Router BLocal: 172.16.1.0/24When I try to ping from one end to to a computer on the other I lose all the packets. When I looked at the transmission information, I found that Router A is transmitting but not receiving and that Router B is receiving but not transmitting.
View 0 Replies
View Related
