Cisco Switching/Routing :: EtherChannel Cross-Stack Between 3750g And 4507R?

Oct 23, 2012

I am running out of ports on a 4507R and would like to use a 3750G-24TS stack that I already have to expand capacity. Is it possible to configure EtherChannel between the 4507R and the 3750G stack and if so what is the best way to do it? without LACP, with active-active mode LACP or passive-active mode LACP...
 
This is what I have in mind:On the 4507R side I would like to use interface GigabitEthernet3/5 and interface GigabitEthernet4/5 where modules 3 and 4 on the 4507R are "6 1000BaseX (GBIC) (WS-X4306-GB)". On the 3750G side I would like to use ports 28 on both switches in the stack which are equipped with Cisco GLC-T= 1000BASE-T SFP transceiver module for Category 5 copper wire with RJ-45 connector. [URL] Cross-Stack EtherChannel Without PAgP or LACP should look like this:
 
3750switchstackA(config)#interface gigabitethernet 1/0/28
3750switchstackA(config-if)#channel-group 1 mode on
3750switchstackA(config-if)#switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
3750switchstackA(config-if)#switchport mode trunk
3750switchstackA(config)#interface gigabitethernet 2/0/28
3750switchstackA(config-if)#channel-group 1 mode on

[code]....

is that what I should be doing? is there any benefit to the active-active mode LACP or passive-active mode LACP and which are applicable to the case above?

View 1 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 - EtherChannel Cross-Stack With EMC VNX

May 22, 2013

We are configuring a new EMC VNX, and plan to use Ether channel with our 3750x stack.  We would like to configure it for both additional bandwidth and for redundancy.  What is the best configuration to use?  Should we trunk the channel or use switch port mode access, and use channel-group on or protocol LACP (which state active or passive)?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Cross Stack EtherChannel From 3750 To 2960

Mar 25, 2013

We have a pair of WS-C3750X-24T-S in a stack and four WS-C2960S-48TS-L in a stack of their own. There is not really anything too fancy configured (no special VLAN configuration/trunks or etc.) but the 3750 do have two ports configured as L3 for routing. We are not trying to use those ports for EtherChannel. These devices are running IOS 12.2(55)SE3 Essentially we are attempting to make an EtherChannel group using port 48 on all four of the 2960's in their stack (four ports). On the 3750 we will configure an EtherChannel group using port 23 and 24 on both switches (four ports). We then connect them up to form a four member EtherChannel.The ports on both ends are configured as mode ON and they are all 1Gb ports. I elected mode on because I understand at least one of the EtherChannel protocols will not work cross stack. What I would like to ask is whether the above configuration is possible or are we hitting some sort of limitation of EtherChannel cross stack, etc..? I cannot find anything to suggest this configration is invalid, but thought I would ask to see if I missed something in the EtherChannel articles.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Cross-Stack 10-Gigabit EtherChannel On 3750E / 3750-X

Jan 28, 2012

According to the following Cisco webpage, cross-stack 10-Gigabit EtherChannel is possible on the 3750 with up to two 10-Gigabit modules, using LACP: url...However, the webpage doesn't confirm if this functionality is restricted to a particular 3750 model, such as 3750E, or if it applies to all models. It also doesn't specify any particular IOS feature set. I've tried Cisco Software Advisor but it doesn't list this feature on either the 3750E or 3750-X. This is possible on the 2960-S switches (i.e. cross-stack 10gig EtherChannel)?

View 23 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Configuring EtherChannel Between 3750-X Cross-stack And 6509E Switch?

Mar 3, 2013

configuring EtherChannel between 3750-X cross-stack and 6509E switch. I use two ports on 3750s, and two ports on 6509. I just need it as a trunk. For some elusive reason one port on 3750 keeps being err-disabled, and one on 6509 notconnected.
 
Here is what I did so far.
 
3750
!
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/22
description ***VSS-RNOC-link***
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 2

[code]....
 
Problem with :

GigabitEthernet1/0/22 is down, line protocol is down (err-disabled)
GigabitEthernet2/1/29 is down, line protocol is down (notconnect)
 
I tried shutting them down, then no shutting them again. Didn't work.

View 11 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 - Cross-stack Ether Channel 20Gb And STP

Feb 22, 2012

i want to realize a 20gb ring stp with 6  3750x stacked by 2. I want to install 2 3750x stacked configured in hsrp mode with other 2 3750 stacked. These 2 different stack are interconnected by a cross-stack ether channel 20Gb  fiber. On the other side of the room i want to create a new stack with 2 3750x with cross-stack ether channel 20gb connected with the previous 2 stacks. So, in total 3 different cross-stack ether channel 20Gb stacks interconnected creating a ring stp of 20 Gb.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: EtherChannel On 3750G-16TD-S And 3750x-48T-S With 10GB

Nov 20, 2011

Any experience with bundling a 10GB interface on a 3750G-16TD-S with a WS-C3750X-48T-S with a 10GB interface. I have worked with 5 different TAC engineers and so far I have not gotten an answer on why the switch will not let me bundle the 10GB with another 10GB interface.
 
Same switch Stack – not a cross stack.
 
Tried every configuration possible with no luck.   I originally thought it might be the stack-ring speed – I corrected that today and it is running at 32GB –
 
The only thing I can think of now is it might be a hardware limitation on the 3750G-16TD-S ?
 
Q. What performance of the 10 Gigabit Ethernet port on the Cisco Catalyst WS-C3750G-16TD switches?

A. The Ten Gigabit Ethernet uplink on the Cisco Catalyst WS-C3750G-16TD switches is 1.25:1 oversubscribed and provides maximum throughput of 8Gb/s.   –

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Etherchannel Does Not Go Up / Up From 3750 Stack To 6k5 Vss

May 19, 2012

We have two 6k5 configured as vss and it is working fine. For each floor we have a 3750 stack. In each 3750 stack we have 4 switches. From the first 3750 we have a fiber link to the first 6k5 and from the fourth switch we have another fiber link to the other 6k5 switch, for each floor/3750 stack, both configured as etherchannel. We installled each 3750 stack/floor in different maintenance windows; in all these installations we have problems configuring the etherchannel. After we configure the etherchannel on 3750 stack and in the vss, the etherchannel does not go up/up. We see the etherchannel up/down; after a lot off work, try and error, configuring shut/ no shut, adding and excluding links from the etherchannel; in any aleatory moment the etherchannel goes up/up and works fine. Is there any bug related with these IOS versions, or is there any right procedure to configure etherchannel from vss to 3750 stack?

3750 stack config (IOS
Cisco IOS Software, C3750 Software (C3750-IPBASEK9-M), Version 12.2(50)SE1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2))
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1switchport trunk encapsulation dot1qswitchport trunk allowed vlan 100,101,371,372switchport mode trunkchannel-group 1 mode on!interface GigabitEthernet4/0/1switchport trunk encapsulation dot1qswitchport trunk allowed vlan 100,101,371,372switchport mode trunkchannel-group 1 mode on!interface Port-channel1switchport trunk encapsulation dot1qswitchport trunk allowed vlan 100,101,371,372switchport mode trunk

[code]....

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 - Etherchannel Across 2 L3 Switches To Stack

Mar 26, 2012

I am wanting to etherchannel from a 3750 stack to core Layer 3 switches (also 3750) with a cable going to each core switch, I have put both core switches and the stack under a 28bit subnet mask, but I dont seem to be load balancing across both links.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Is It Possible To Stack A 3750G And 3750X

May 26, 2011

I have a 3750G and bought a new 3750X.  It possible to stack these two together?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750G Won't Join A Stack

Jan 29, 2013

I have a 3750G switch that can't detect another switch or be detected through its stack ports. I tried the recommended test; looping a cable between the ports and rebooting. I get the following message as the switch boots: SM:  Detected stack cables at PORT1 PORT2. However, if I connnect another switch, it won't detect it and can't form a stack.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Upgrade IOS On A 3750G-24T Stack?

Feb 20, 2012

I'm trying to upgrade the IOS ver on a 3750G stack (2 switches), but the img on the switch is too old.The stack is running IOS c3750-i9-mz.121-19.EA1d.bin, and when I tried to upgrade to a newer version, I tried to go to IOS ver c3750-advipservicesk9-mz.122-35.SE5.bin since I need to enable ssh on the switch, but the switch did not reload.
 
Here's a prtscreen of the switch ver:
  
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) C3750 Software (C3750-I9-M), Version 12.1(19)EA1d, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Copyright (c) 1986-2004 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Mon 05-Apr-04 22:40 by antonino
Image text-base: 0x00003000, data-base: 0x007CBC3C

[code]...
 
what IOS ver can I upgrade to that is not already deferred?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Switch 3750G Stack

Jun 17, 2012

have one 3750G stack with 4 switches and this stack is presenting the follow log message:
 
%PLATFORM_UCAST-4-PREFIX:  One or more, more specific prefixes could not be programmed into TCAM and are being covered by a less specific prefix, and the packets may be software forwarded.
 
In this stack we are using the layer 3 with OSPF routing, and the current sdm prefer is default:
 
switch-01-3750#sh sdm prefer
The current template is "desktop default" template.
The selected template optimizes the resources in
the switch to support this level of features for
8 routed interfaces and 1024 VLANs.(code)

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 / Stack Switch With Etherchannel Configuration

Dec 20, 2012

I have stack of 2 switches 3750?I config etherchannel between them.
 
here is result
 
2      Po2(SD)         LACP      Fa1/0/15(I) Fa2/0/15(I)
 
Both ports are up up but standalone Int port channel 2 is down down.Need to know if this is default behaviour when we config etherchannel between stack switches?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Mixed 3750-X And 3750G In A Stack?

Jul 17, 2012

Any one try to form a stack with mixed 3750-X and 3750G? Is there any prerequisites in hardware and software?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750G Stack Slow Performance

Nov 19, 2012

I am currently having performance issues running a 3 x stack 3750G (different models) as a core for a network of roughly 12 x distribution switches. [code] As above, I have a 12 port Fibre switch and 2 x 3750G-48 port switches. [code] I tried to change the SDM to route but hit another issue where the 3750g-48 does not support SDM route so I had to revert back to desktop VLAN.Could the SDM Template be the reason for slow performance? If so which SDM Template should i use as this is the Core L3 switch.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Stack 3750G-12S-S With 3750X-48T Switch?

Apr 14, 2012

if we can stack the 3750G switch with a 3750X switch ?

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Adding 3750X To 3750G Stack?

Jun 13, 2012

Our customer has a stack of 6 3750G switches.  They want to add another switch to the stack.  I tried to quote another G, but I got a warning that the G series is EOS January 30,2013.  Can I add a 3750X to the stack?  I know that no matter what switch I get, I will have to upgrade the IOS in the stack, as the stack is running 12.2(25)SEE2. 

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Difference Between Stack 3750G And 3750X?

Jul 15, 2012

I have a cisco WS-C3750G-24TS with IOS flash :/ c3750-mz.122-ipservicesk9-25.SEB4.bin "
 
I purchased a new Cisco WS-C3750X-24 with the IOS flash :/ c3750e-universalk9-mz.150-1.SE/c3750e-universalk9-mz.150-1.SE.bin. ( NEW )
  
When i configured a stack between the two 3750,  the new switch restarted due the version mismatch (different IOS´s);
 
 We have two versions: 
 
WS-C3750G-24TS-ipservicesk9 flash :/ c3750-mz.122-25.SEB4.bin "
  
VS
 
WS-C3750X-24 flash :/ c3750e-universalk9-mz.150-1.SE/c3750e-universalk9-mz.150-1.SE.bin.
  
Is that possible to configure a stack between then?
 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Tenho  um cisco WS-C3750G-24TS com o IOS flash:/c3750-ipservicesk9-mz.1
22-25.SEB4.bin"
Adquiri  um novo cisco WS-C3750X-24 com o IOS flash:/c3750e-universalk9-mz.150-1.SE/c3750e-universalk9-mz.150-1.SE.bin.

[code]...

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750G - Stack Switching Priorities Not Correct

Mar 21, 2012

I got Two Distribution Switches of Cisco 3750G. Each Distribution have two 3750G switches stacked. I also have one Cisco 3750V2 Access Switch connected to both Distribution. When I am checking for redundancy, I can only get redundancy test pass for one link not atall for other. If I have a link up with Distribution 1 only then its fine; but disappointment with Distribution 2 link. I can see that the switch priorities of Dist 2 is not correct ie. Master's priority is 10 and Member's is 15.
 
My question is that due to misconfigured priorities on Distribution 2 stack switches I am failing with redundancy if ONLY Dist 2 is up and Dist 1 is down.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750G Spanning Tree On New Switch Stack

Nov 3, 2011

I am about rip and replace my current 3750G stack with a 3750X stack. I have trunked over vlan and vtp info and implemented a config so it should be ready to go other then moving cables onto it. However one thing I want to correct with our current setup is that the root bridge on our vlans including vlan 1 is on a separate set of switches that we control, however I would like this new stack to be the root bridge for all of our vlans. It will be the central set of switches that all other switches trunk into.  I have pre-set higher spanning-tree priorities for each vlan on the new stack so I expect as I move lines into it that the tree will be re-calculated with it as the root bridge. I've ensured that there are no root guards on any of the other switches trunks and priorities are all at default levels for each vlan. Should I enforce root guard on the trunk interfaces of the new master stack?  Most of the trunks are port-channels to the other switches - do I need to set root guard on the Port channel interface or on the individual ports that make up the Port channel? On both? Any other recommendations in regards to implementing spanning-tree with the new stack? I know using port channels eliminates a lot of potential for loops but not every trunk is and I'd still like to have spanning-tree on.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Can Stack 3750G-12S-S Switch With 3750E-24TD-S

Apr 22, 2012

Can we stack a 3750G-12S-S switch with a 3750-E-24TD-S switch?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750G Stack-wise Port Error?

Aug 7, 2012

I have a stack of 3750G's where the connection between switch 1 port 1 and switch 2 port 2 are down
 
Stack Port Status             Neighbors
Switch#  Port 1     Port 2           Port 1   Port 2
--------------------------------------------------------
  1       Down        Ok              None       3
  2        Ok        Down                3      None
  3        Ok         Ok                   1        2
 
I have ruled out the stackwise cable as the problem but would like to know which switch has the problem

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750G - Adding Additional Switch And Making It Stack

Feb 29, 2012

I currently have Cisco 3750G which is currently live and active and fully populated and only have remote access.
 
I have an additional same switch which I would like to stack. My initial plans were to have 2 GIbit etherchannels, but I came across the option to Stacks both switch with each other.
 
When I do a show switch on the live switch its set as a Member: [code]

I would like to add the new switch to the stack without losing the config for the switch which is live. I understand that the highest priority of the switches becomes the Master but as the live switch is Priority 1, would chancing this affect the switches config, or would it lose connection at all?
 
Also when I plug in the new switch and it reboot how do I ensure it becomes the slave without rebooting the live switch?The cables on the switch do they have to go to port1 on the live switch and port 1 on the new switch or can they be port 1 and port 2?

View 19 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Upgrading Firmware On Mixed 3750G And 3750X Stack

Jul 3, 2012

I've got a mixed stack as follows:

Switch 1 - 3750X-24P
Switch 2 - 3750G-24TS
Switch 3 - 3750G-24T
 
Running 12.2(53)SE2, IP base.  Now I tried upgrading the firmware on the entire stack to 12.2(55)SE4 and ran into this error:(Command: archive download-sw /imageonly /overwrite /allow-feature-upgrade tftp://10.20.20.13/c3750e-universalk9-tar.122-55.SE4.tar)
 
 Error: The image in the archive which would to used to upgade system number 2 does not support that system type.I haven't as yet removed the "3750G-24TS" switch from the stack and re-tried as yet, however, is the expectation that without the 24TS, the upgrade should work?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 3750G / WS-3750G-48PS Memory

Jan 15, 2012

Has any come across show ver memory details on 3750G-48PS as below, One of our Catalyst 3750G running software 12.2(44)SE2 shows unexpected DRAM as below:

cisco WS-C3750G-48PS (PowerPC405) processor (revision F0) with 0K/12280K bytes of memory. This would equate to around 11MB memory which does not seem right... Is it a known IOS bug?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Load Balancing Over L3 Etherchannel With 3750G

May 18, 2011

Here's the proposed network I have to work with:  LAN A >> ASA Cluster >> 2x3750G Stack >> Cross-stack L3 Etherchannel (2x100Mb Circuits) >> 2x3750G Stack >> ASA Cluster >> LAN B  Company policy governs that traffic between LAN A and LAN B must now be encrypted. ASA Firewalls have been purchased in advance and will be place into the network as above.   Src-dst-ip load-balancing is currently in place on the Layer-3 Eherchannel.  How can I encrypt the traffic using the ASAs and still ensure proper load-balancing over the circuits?  I was about to configure a IPSec/GRE Tunnel between the ASA Clusters but I'm concerned that the tunnel will not be load-balanced over the ether channel based on the single source and destination IPs I will need to configure.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: Possible To Configure A Cross Stack Ether-channel Between 2 SG500

Jan 17, 2013

Is it possible to configure a cross stack etherchannel between 2 SG500 (in stack) and 1 SG200/SG300?

View 13 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 / 4500 - Cross Connect 2 V LAN

Mar 18, 2012

I have c3750 and c4500 switches. I want to cross connect 2 v LAN so I need connection 2 different v LAN s. Can you provide example configurations?
 
Whatever other case, I want to cross connect between c7200 and c3750 2 different v LAN. It's possible?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 1721 - How To Configure IP To Cross Two Router

Oct 20, 2011

Long time since I have had to configure a router and have a small project
 
Here is what I have in a simple diagram:
  
PC(static IP)--to--Switch--to--(Ethernet0 int, WIC0)1721 router(FastEthernet0 int, built-in)--to--Switch--to--PC(DHCP)
  
I need static IP PC to be able to ping the DHCP client. Static IP units 10.1.1.x/16, DHCP clients 10.1.3.x/16.
 
I have found these overlap and thus give errors and will even shutdown the interface if I enable certain things like routing or bridging.
 
So I gather I need to change one interface IP range, which would be the DHCP side, I need to stay 10.1.1.x/16 for static side.

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: CAB-STACK-50CM Bent Stack Cable

Feb 27, 2013

Is there a stacking cable that is "bent"?Im using this cable:"CAB-STACK-50CM", "Cisco StackWise 50CM Stacking Cable".But it takes up to much room in the back of the switch, is there such a thing as "bent" stacking cable.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Configuring Stack-power On A 3750X Stack?

Oct 31, 2012

I have 3 switches in my 3750 X stack. I am getting the following error in the logs:  %PLATFORM_STACKPOWER-4-PRIO_CONFLICT: Switch 1's power stack has conflicting power priorities.  Not sure what I should do next. Below is my Stack-power configuration:
 
Power stack name: Powerstack-1    Stack mode: Power sharing    Stack topology: Ring    Switch 1:        Power budget: 735        Low port priority value: 20        High port priority value: 10        Switch priority value: 2        Port 1 status: Connected        Port 2 status: Connected        Neighbor on port 1: c464.1308.7900        Neighbor on port 2: e8b7.4827.e680
    Switch 3:        Power budget: 729        Low port priority value: 22        High port priority value: 13        Switch priority value: 4        Port 1 status: Connected        Port 2 status: Connected        Neighbor on port 1: 2894.0fd9.9f00        Neighbor on port 2: 2894.0fd8.e200
    Switch 2:        Power budget: 690        Low port priority value: 21        High port priority value: 12        Switch priority value: 3        Port 1 status: Connected        Port 2 status: Connected        Neighbor on port 1: 2894.0fd8.e200        Neighbor on port 2: c464.1308.7900
 
Each switch has its own 715W power supply in it and all check out OK.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960G Configuring Ether-channel On Stack-wise Stack

Sep 24, 2012

A site that i am responsible for has the following equipment installed: 

2 x 3750G Switches configured as a stack using Stackwise - Collapsed Core/Distribution Layer
5 x 2960G Switches as Access Layer switches
 
WAN connections into the Core/Distribution Layer are all Gigabit Ethernet over Fibre.This is a dedicated CCTV Network with 50 Cameras all streaming video into the Core (decoders connected to access switches)Each 2960G has 2 links to the Core/Distribution 3750G Switches, 1 to each switch - Gigabit.I'm running rapid-pvst on all switches, so spanning tree is blocking one of the ports and effectively halving the 2 gig bandwidth. Next year our customer is going to add in a further 50 - 60 cameras.After monitoring the current loading on the ports in use, we have suggested to the customer that the 2 connections to each should be Ether-channeled together. [code]
 
First interface takes commands no problem, keep getting the message that etherchannel cannot be configured across different switches in a stack when i try to put the second interface commands on.

View 8 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved