I have the following VPN site-2-site configuration.The trouble I'm having is host 172.168.88.3 in site A is not able to ping 172.168.200.3 in site B and visa versa. Think I have added the static routes and ACLs correctly on the 3560 switches (acting as gateways) and both PIX's to access the internal networks. Host 172.168.9.3 can ping 172.168.200.3 fine.
View 3 RepliesI have two Cisco routers - 2911 in HQ and RV180 in branch office. Because in HQ LAN network I have some development servers, to which guys from branch office need to have acces, I decided to setup VPN site-to-site between HQ and branch office. Everything went quite smoothly, on both devices I see, that ipsec connection is established. Unfortunately I am not able to ping resources from one network to other one and vice versa. Below is the configuration of 2911 router (I skipped som unimportant (imho) configuration directives) :
crypto isakmp policy 1
encr 3des
hash md5
[Code].....
cisco products and am struggling getting a VPN going between an ASA 5505 and 5510. I have a VPN created (using the VPN wizward on both) and it shows the VPN is up, but I can't ping the remote site (from either side).
View 11 Replies View RelatedI just get it that I can make a VPN Site-to-Site IPSec. But if I try to send a ping from one PC (network 1) to the other PC (network 2) it failed.
PC (Network 1) <ASA5505> Switch <ASA5510> PC (Network 2)
between the two ASA I have a funkctional VPN IPSec tunnel, but I can`t get access from one to theother network.
That are the access-list on the ASA5505:
asa5505#
access-list cached ACL log flows: total 0, denied 0 (deny-flow-max 4096)
alert-interval 300
access-list Inside_ICMP; 4 elements
[Code].....
We have two networks HQ and Site1 and for some reason we can’t ping the inside IP for Site1 PIX device. We have site-site-VPN set up between the two and everything works fine except we can’t ping the Site1 PIX from internal IP. However, I can ASDM/SSH in from HQ to the external IP of the Site1 PIX.
HQ is using an ASA 5550 (172.1.0.1) PC from HQ (172.1.64.x) Site1 is using a PIX-515E (172.2.0.1) PC from Site1 (172.2.64.x)
Ping from HQ PC to Site1 PC (172.1.64.x to 172.2.64.x) works fine
Ping from Site1 PC to HQ PC (172.2.64.x to 172.1.64.x) works fine
[code]...
ASDM/SSH from any HQ PC to Site1 PIX internal IP (172.1.64.x to 172.2.0.1) doesn’t work
ASDM/SSH from any HQ PC to Site1 PIX external IP (172.1.64.x to Site1 external IP) works fine
Everything was working fine until we recently changed the outside IP address for Site1 because we switch to a different ISP. Nothing changed on the HQ ASA or Site1 PIX other than the outside IP address on Site1 PIX. I did rebuild the site-to-site VPN tunnel between Site1 and HQ.
We recently purchased an SRP527W router because of its capability to configure site-site VPN tunnels. The configuration of IKE and IPSEC is working and the tunnel comes up but the problem is that the router is passing our internal IP addresses through the tunnel. The remote end we are connecting to requires us to hide all traffic behind one IP address which would ideally be our external static IP address from our ISP.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have 3 ASA 5505 Firewall, I am creating Site 2 Site Full mesh tunnel with each firewall, the problem i am facing is two of the firewalls internal schema are same, Like Site 1 has an Internal Schema: 192.168.0.0, Site 2 has an Internal Schema 192.168.0.0, Site has an Internal Schema 10.10.10.0
For that i have to create a policy static nat and access list??
I configurred a access-list like below,
access-list vpn_ih_site3_site1 permit ip 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0access-list vpn_ih_site3_site2 permit ip 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0
Relevant Topology:
(Corporate LAN: 10.10.0.0/21) > (Catalyst 3560 L3 Switch: # ip routing) > (10.10.255.253/30) > (Cisco 1921: edge router) > ISP
One-to-One NAT statement in edge router:
# ip nat inside source static <inside local ip> <inside global ip>
Packets destined for our branch offices across IPsec Site-to-Site VPNs, originating from the above inside local IP, change their source address (at the edge router) to the above inside global IP, forwarding traffic destined to branch to our ISPs gateway, instead of over the VPN tunnel.
After establishing a remote IPsec VPN connection, via Cisco VPN Client, I am able to ping the inside local IP specified above with no issues (the router sends the traffic sourced from the above inside local IP before applying the One-to-One NAT statement).
Relevant configuration:
Remote VPN ACL:
ip access-list extended REMOTE_VPN_ACL
permit ip <ip local pool subnet> 0.0.0.255 any
permit ip 10.10.0.0 0.0.7.255 any
Site-to-Site VPN ACL:
ip access-list extended SITE-TO-SITE_VPN_ACL
permit ip 10.10.0.0 0.0.7.255 10.10.12.0 0.0.0.255
permit ip 10.10.12.0 0.0.0.255 10.10.0.0 0.0.7.255
[code]....
If I remove the One-to-One NAT statement, both the Site-to-Site VPN and Remote VPNs can communicate with the relevant inside local IP. With the One-to-One NAT statement active, only the Remote VPN can communicate successfully (as the NAT statement change the packets source address to the inside global IP).
Why is the One-to-One NAT statement only applying to packets destined for our Site-to-Site VPNs, and what is the appropriate way to prevent this?
I am trying to set up a site to site ipsec connection. AT site A, I have Vlan's 652-10.55.216.0/24, Vlan653 -10.55.217.0/24, Vlan 654-10.55.217.0/24 and Vlan655-10.55.219.0/24 and at site B, Vlan650-10.55.214.0/24 and Vlan651-10.55.215.0/24.The problem is that I am unable to get any associations when i do a "sh crypto isakmp sa"/"sh crypto ipsec sa" on either router at each site.I am also unable to ping by pluging in a laptop into the site at each site. Laptop at site A is set to access vlan 655 and laptop at site B is set to acess vlan 651. I can ping all the devices from one end to the other.I have turned on debug crypto isakmp, debug crypto ipsec, debug crypto ipsec errors but dont get anything at all as output.I have attached the sh run for each router Cisco (1941/K9) and switch (Catalyst 3750) at each site.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a very basic lab site to site vpn setup where I have a ASA 5505 running v7.2(4) on one side and a cisco 2811 on the other side.
What's my issue?
I can't seem to ping from cisco router to the 'inside' network of ASA (see config below) and can't seem to ping from ASA packets leaving the 'inside' interface to cisco router even w/ an ICMP ACL permit outside in. However I'm able to ping within ASA inside network & ping cisco 2811 side w/ packets leaving ASA 'outside' interface just fine.
example:
-------
ciscoasa# ping inside 10.20.20.1 (to cisco loopback1 from ASA inside)
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.20.20.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
[Code].....
I have two Cisco ASA routers and I have a site to site vpn set up between the two. The VPN link works but Site A can't ping anything on Site B. Site B can ping Site A. Site B can ping other pcs on it's own network. Site A has been in place for a while and has other site to site VPNs that work fine, so I think the problem is with Site B. Here is the config for Site B:
Result of the command: "show running-config"
: Saved
:
ASA Version 8.4(4)1
!
hostname SaskASA
enable password POgOWyKyb0jgJ1Hm encrypted
passwd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted
names
[code]....
I am unable to ping any device on the internal lan from the opposite side of the tunnel. However, the tunnel connects successfully. I have the firewall disabled on both routers. Site A is using 192.168.3.1 and Site B is using 192.168.4.1. Any thoughts on why I cant ping one router from the other?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI've 3 Cisco 800 series routers and I needed to configure site-to-site vpn tunnel from branch2 to the main office(branch 1 VPN was already configured and working). I've managed to get the tunnel up and everything seemed OK as sh cry isa sa,sh cry session and sh cry ipsec sa didn't seem to have any problems.
Although the tunnel is up, I cannot ping PC-s on either side of the vpn tunnel.
I have a requirement to create a site to site vpn tunnel on ASA 5510 from a remote site to my HO, ihave already other site-to-site tunnels are up and running on the ASA.The issue is my remote site has got the network address which falls in one of the subnet used in HO(192.168.10.0/24).My requirement is only My remote site need to accees couple of my servers in HO which is in 192.168.200.0/24 subnet.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have ordered a pair of Cisco ASA5520 (ASA5520-BUN-K9).Now there is a requirement to terminate site-to-site VPN from remote site. Do we need VPN plus licence for this and how much it cost?
View 1 Replies View RelatedThe scenario where a Site to Site VPN tunnel has been established between Site A and Site B. Lan on Site A can ping Lan on Site B. My problem is a Printer behind Site B needs to be accessed by using the WAN IP address of Site A. Also i could not ping the remote lan or printer from the router.
Below are my configure on the Cisco 877 in site A.
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 5425 bytes
!
! Last configuration change at 15:09:21 PCTime Fri Jun 15 2012 by admin01
!
version 12.4
no service pad
[code]....
I have a request to establish a site to site VPN with a customer. While collecting the information I give them our local network subnet which is a private subnet (192.168.5.0). They asked me if I could give them a public address instead. They can not work with the 192.168.5 subnet. Is this possible?
My side of the VPN is an ASA 5505 running 8.2(2). The other side i believe is a Checkpoint.
I setup RA-VPN under local asa 5510 IP pool (192.168.127.0/24) and all was working fine. I got internet and local network access.
Then i have 5 site to site VPN working fine but when im traying to access to those L2L VPNs from the remote acces client im not able to do that. So after that i decided to obtain IP addresses from my DHCP server so i can obtain IPs from my local network (172.17.16.0/16) and then access normally to the VPN site to site. But the surprise was that the VPN cisco client is getting local IP address (172.17.16.222) perfectly but im not able to access even to my local network.
I have the same-security-traffic permit inter-interface same-security-traffic permit intra-interface enable.
I am try to setup my office network to able to connect to one of my customer HQ via site to site VPN. I am using Cisco 1841 router to do the job.
The problem that I am facing now is no able to connect my other PC in office to the remote site.
show crypto isakmp sa
IPv4 Crypto ISAKMP SA
dst src state conn-id status
202.x.x.x 175.x.x.x QM_IDLE 1001 ACTIVE(code)
Remote-access users aren't able to reach our remote network through a site-to-site VPN tunnel between two ASA 5505's.
I've seen several threads about that here, I've run through the walkthrough at [URL] I've taken a stab at setting split tunnelling and nat exemption, but it seems I'm still missing something. Remote-access users can reach the main site, but not the remote site.
Remote-access (vpn-houston) uses 192.168.69.0/24.
The main site (houston) uses 10.0.0.0/24
The remote site (lugoff) uses 10.0.1.0/24
I have a site-to-site VPN already established, everything is working as it should. I'm trying to block the remote network from accessing our network since we only need to access theirs. I'm sure this is something very easy to implement with an ACL but I'm not sure where this rule needs to go. The VPN is on ASA 5505.
View 5 Replies View Relatedwe set up a site-to-site-vpn between a 5505 and a 5510 (both asa8.3.1). We configured both sides using the VPN-Wizard in the ASDM. When we try to ping from the network behind the 5505 (192.168.45.0/24) to any host behind the 5510 (192.168.0.0/24) the tunnel gets established but the ping doesn't get trough. After that we tried to connect via RDP to any host behind the 5510 and it worked well (same with ssh, telnet,vnc etc.). Now we want to map a network-share on a 2008-Server behind the 5510 but it's not working. In the ASDM-Log I see some "denied by inside-access in"-messages for the ports 139 and 445. Isn't it right that the whole traffic in the vpn-tunnel bypasses the acl? Even if we open both ports we can't connect to the network-share?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have ASA 5505, i configured site to site vpn between central site and remote site and is working. Now the problem is we use remote site for troubleshooting purpose, so we need to create a tunnel from remote site to central site. I need to configure such a way that remote site can craete a tunnel to central site, but central site not able to create a tunnel, it just respond to remote site.
View 3 Replies View Relatedi have 2 router asa 5505 with base license i wanna make site to site vpn connection and remote site using vpn client to connect first i have hdsl router with 5 public ip i wanna try it by giving 1 public ip to each router and try the vpn but nothing work?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a PIX 515 and am working with a Site-to-Site VPN. When I do not specify a filter on the Group Policy I can successfully access the remote network and the remote network can access my local network. However this by itself poses a securty risk for my local servers. I need to be able to access the remote network fully, however only one or two workstations on the remote network need to access mine.
If I add access-list vpn-remote-site extended permit ip host remote-wkstn1 any then only the remote workstation can access my remote network. This gets me a step closer as now only the remote workstation can access my network effectively denying everything else. However, from my local network I can now only access the remote workstation and not all of the other devices. I do not have any control over the remote firewall and would like to make sure it is secured on my end.
i want configure VPN between backoffice which have ASA5510 firewall with static IP and site which have cisco router 1861 with dynamic IP.
how i can configure the site to site between them?
From My Router that connects to Cable modem i am unable to ping website 4.2.2.2I am able to ping all other websites fines.Same website i can ping from my pc and all other switches fine.Router has only 1 ACL thats for NAT.
View 25 Replies View RelatedSite is not opening in any of my systems in the local network. but if i change ip to a real ip or if i use some other internet source like netsetter then it gets opened.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have configure Cisco 5505 as layer 2 firewall mode. I have vendor machine connected to Cisco ASA 5505 on port 2 as VLAN2 inside then VLAN1 outside connected to my internal network on layer 2 cisco 2960 switch. This machine needs access only to LOGMEIN then block all internal/internet traffic.
vendor machine on vlan 2 inside >> Cisco ASA 5505 vlan1 outside >> layer2 switch >> internal LAN >> Cisco 5520 main FW >>> INTERNET
I have an ASA 5525 and need to configure site to site ipsec vpn to 3 peers. I currently have an existing /28 public address from my ISP that is used by other services.Is there a way to use this existing ip range to configure IPSEC tunnels to 3 peers ?
View 10 Replies View RelatedI configurated Ipsec vpn at asa 5510. my inside ip 192.168.10.156my public ip: 85.x.x.xmy peer ip : 62.x.x.x
the project is that:
the remote site want the interesting traffic like that:
source ip 172.16.1.104 can access destination ip 10.0.154.27
My inside ip is 192.168.10.0/0 and i can not to change it 172.16.1.0/24 and i can not to add this ip at my network.
I would like to know both Cisco 2901 or 2921 router and Cisco 5505 ASA can build site to site VPN.
1) what is the different to build site to site VPN between router and firewall ?
2) which is the best choice if using in site to site VPN connection ?
Our Headquarter (asa 5510) is running a site to site vpn connection with a Branch office (router 2811). All remote users are accesing the internet through the VPN and also accesing headquarter file servers.I want to know if there is a way for some remote users to be able to use the vpn for accesing the file servers but to access the internet through the branch office. The rest of the remote users will be still accessing the internet through VPN.
View 2 Replies View Related