Iphone 4S latest IOS5 V 5.1.1 installed?I'm not able to make native IPSEC VPN connection to work against my company Cisco 877 Instead, all my notebook and netbook with Cisco VPN Client installed work fine when they remotely connect to company's 877 Enabling 877 debug, it seems Iphone successfully pass the phase 1 ike connection (in fact Iphone asks me for phase2 user/pass) but it hung at phase2 giving me back the error "Negotiation with VPN server failed"
Here is how I configured my 877 VPN part :
R1(config)# aaa new-model
R1(config)# aaa authentication login default local
R1(config)# aaa authentication login vpn_xauth_ml_1 local
R1(config)# aaa authentication login sslvpn local
R1(config)# aaa authorization network vpn_group_ml_1 local
R1(config)# aaa session-id common
It seems 877 even comes to allocate a local LAN ip address to Iphone (192.168.0.21) but then something goes wrong.....
I have a 2811 Router (config below) with VPN configured. I can connect through the VPN and access devices on the native VLAN but I can't access the 10.77.5.0 (VLAN 5) network (I don't care to access the 10.77.10.0 - VLAN 10 network). This issue has been plagueing me for quite a while. I believe it's a NAT or ACL issue. VPN client IP pool is 192.168.77.1 - 192.168.77.10. [code]
I'm configuring this asa for to connect home users to my network using the native microsoft vpn clients with windows xp over internet.This asa have on the outside interface one public intenet ip and in the inside inferface have configured in the the network 192.168.0.x and i want to acces to this network from internet users using native vpn clients.I tested with one pc connected directly to the outside interface and works well, but when i connect this interface to internet and tried to connect on user to the vpn i can see in the logs this, and can't connect with error 800.TCP request discarded from "public_ip_client/61648" to outside:publicip_outside_interface/1723"
Just trying to figure out how LAP manage clients in a h-reap setup.Have a setup with native vlan on 144 (switch and AP) and ssid tagging in other vlan... Got this on switch:
Jan 12 10:31:43.121: %PORT_SECURITY-2-PSECURE_VIOLATION: Security violation occurred, caused by MAC address 0811.9695.9b04 on port FastEthernet0/42. Jan 12 10:31:43.121: %PORT_SECURITY-2-PSECURE_VIOLATION_VLAN: Security violation on port FastEthernet0/42 due to MAC address 0811.9695.9b04 on VLAN 144 Jan 12 10:37:42.770: %PORT_SECURITY-2-PSECURE_VIOLATION: Security violation occurred, caused by MAC address 0811.9695.9b04 on port FastEthernet0/42. Jan 12 10:37:42.770: %PORT_SECURITY-2-PSECURE_VIOLATION_VLAN: Security violation on port FastEthernet0/42 due to MAC address 0811.9695.9b04 on VLAN 144
Wonder why clients MAC is seen on native vlan (and ofcourse also on taged vlan) ...?
I have a small home network currently using a cisco 841 which is working great. Host a web site and Exchange plus all 10 computers access the net using Verizon FIOS all works. I can even VPN in to my newtwork remotely.I can only VPN using the Cisco client. I would like to use the Native Windows Client and Ipads and Iphones. I believe they use PPTP and the Cisco client is using IPSEC.Which Cisco router can I get that would support all the above?
I am trying to configure RV082 router with Mac Native VPN Client for my remote access. However, no matter what I did, I am not able to make it works. Can any one can give me an example of how to conguration my RV082 router and Mac Book Pro(Mountain Lion)?
I have remote branches that connect to the corporate office as a site-to-site VPN. Now the clients at the branch are getting an application that is using an unsecured port (tcp/23). I would like to use a set of ASA 5520's that I have at the corporate office, with the AnyConnect license on them. I want the client machines to establish a tunnel from the client to one of these ASA's. The ASA' then would have a connection to the VLAN that the receiving server is housed on. The trick is to just establish the tunnel from the client to the ASA that will allow the IP of the client to not be translated. So I would use the ASA as a security 'pass-through' for the clients that use this new application.
I've been labbing on my asa5505 at home, setting up different VPN solutions for testing purposes. However, I can't get my anyconnect client to establish a DTLS tunnel when connecting (anyconnect only shows tls, and does not display any errors about not connecting with dtls)I have set dtls port to 444 and this port is open on the other side.
Device asa 5550 - But can a Client establish a SSL VPN to remote network and devices on the remote network access local network printers? so you got one client one network A that creates a SSL VPN to network B , can network B be configured so that automatic job come across the same ssl vpn to a Different IP?
Does RV082 can establish PPTP VPN connection as CLIENT? (i'm aware it can provide function of VPN PPTP server but could not find if it can act as client).To explain further: I'm based in Europe and use US VPN to access some US services like Netflix, Pandora, etc.. (i'm paying for US VPN account as service so I have no other choice than PPTP). I would like to establish permanent PPTP VPN tunnel with remote server so all computers in the house can go through tunnel when i browse for Pandora or Netflix for example (is this router capable of routing policy too so not all the traffic would be routed through tunnel?)
I have a new FVS318G with latest FW, trying to configure FVS318 as VPN server, which to allow VPN client such as Android and Iphone be able to connect to FVS318 from the cloud and establish VPN tunnel.(url...), Netgear si using the term so unusual, it calls VPN Gateway and VPN client.Don't know why don't they call VPN server and VPN client.Anyway I did call Netgear Tech-supp.According to the Tech, there is not require the username and password for client to connect to Netgear VPN gateway.I am totally lost. I understand that FVS318 does not support PPTP and L2TP so no luck for Windows, but Android and Iphone have support to IPSec VPN. how to config FVS318 VPN, with username and password (for 2-3 different users username /password credential), VPN policy and Firewall polices if needed for VPN to work.
How to make a non-client VPN connection to the RVS4000 SBR with an iPhone or iPad? I realize that I could setup some pass-through VPN just fine, but I would like to connect directly to the router and was under the impression from the Cisco product video and other research that IOS was now supported.
Can I configure a PIX (515), as PPTP client to establish a tunnel with non-Cisco PPTP server ? Can my PIX initiate this type of connection ?Today, I use a PC with PPTP client to establish this and I want replace this with a PIX and I don´t want depends of a PC.
I am trying to do Leap and Eap-TLS together. How can I write a policy in ACS that would check for identity before choosing the right profile for the request. ACS 5.2 does not support Native eap-tls. I am assuming I will be using Idenity username for Leap and Predefinied Certificate profile identity for eap-tls.
The management VLAN(the one I use to connect to the devices) and the native VLAN dont have to be the same VLAN ,right?They are independent and can be different. For instance I can use VLAN 5 for management and 10 as the native VLAN
I have the following problem in LMS 4.0. I see a lot of CDP syslog messages about Native Vlan Mismatch, but the LMS doesn't report it in the disrepancy report. Why?? The similar problem is with TRUNK VLAN Mismatch. The customer doesn't use VTP in his network. All switches are in the VTP transparent mode.
In our network environment, we have a 2960 switch sitting behind our router. Off of this we have a lot of external connections, like our external DNS, firewall, and VPN concentrators. I've configured a VLAN other than the default, moved everything into it and then shut VLAN 1. In this hardening guide it says that your native VLAN should be something other than the user VLAN, but if I am not using any trunk links, wouldn't I not really have a native VLAN? I attempted to make the link to our firewall a trunk link and then set the native VLAN to something else.
I am about to replace the supervisor engine in our pair of distribution switches in our data center. We currently have a FWSM module installed in each of my distribution switches running 3.1(20) code. The old sup720 are running 8.6(4) and the mfsc are running 12.2(17d)SXB11a. I am wondering about the compatibility of running the FWSM with the same code after installing the new VS-S720 modules. I do not plan on configuring virtual switch yet and did plan on upgrading the FWSM to 4 code train but just not immediately. Will I be able to run my FWSM using the current 3.1(20) code after I install my new VS-S720 running in native mode?
If I have to upgrade the FWSM then I need to know if I have to upgrade the module in each distribution switch at the same time? Furthermore I do not believe that the FWSM 4 code is supported in hybrid mode, which means that I will have to convert to native before upgrading to FWSM 4 before I install the VS-S720 in one of my distribution switches. Currently the FWSM modules are in active/standby mode in different chassis.
I had planned to install the VS-S720 module in one of my distribution switch and do the other installation a week later. I would rather not have to convert to native and upgrade the FWSM modules in both distribution switches during the first switch upgrade.
cnDS02> (enable) sh mod Mod Slot Ports Module-Type Model Sub Status --- ---- ----- ------------------------- ------------------- --- -------- 1 1 16 1000BaseX Ethernet WS-X6516A-GBIC no ok 2 .... Please refer to Detail Note. cnDS02> (enable) sh mod
Is PVID the same thing as "native vlan"? Can the native VLAN be changed on a SA520? Currently I believe it to be 1, I'd like to change the native VLAN to 10.
I have a scenario where I have a prexisting production LAN of 192.168.1.0/24 . It's a small organization (a church), but they purchased 3 Aironet 1130ag units. They want to have a "private" WLAN that is part of 192.168.1.0/24 , and a guest WLAN of a different subnet (I chose 192.168.20.0/24) . The two should never meet. There will likely never be a guest computer connected via ethernet. Guest computers would always have to connect wirelessly.
I left VLAN 1 on the SA520 192.168.75.0/24 subnet as default.I created a VLAN 10 , 192.168.1.0/24 subnet, and I created a VLAN 20, 192.168.20.0/24 subnet.Ports 1-3 of the SA520 are members of VLAN 1, 10, and 20 (cannot remove membership of VLAN1, which is pretty annoying).
Both are secured by WPA, and when I connect, the proper DHCP subnet passes from the firewall through to the wireless client, for each respective SSID.Ultimately, I'd like the SBS 2003 server to handle DHCP for VLAN 10, and have the SA520 handle DHCP for VLAN 20, but i'll take what I can get.
The original production LAN is connected via an unmanged switch.I'd like to trunk the unmanaged switch to Port 4 on the SA520. However, since the PVID (native vlan?) of SA520 is 1, and I cannot make Port 4 on the SA520 ony a member of VLAN 10, then anything traffic coming from the unanaged switch will automatically be tagged with VLAN1, correct? Thus causing the already existing production network to start receiving DHCP from the firewall in the 192.168.75.0/24 range.
is it possible with LMS 4.0 and VLAN Port Assignment also to configure auxiliary vlans?
1. I selected Configuration > Workflows > VLAN > Configure Port Assignment. 2. Selected my device (a test switch WS-C3560-8PC-S) 3. Clicked List Ports
All ports were listed, port Fa0/1 has only a native vlan, the ports Fa0/2 - 8 have native and voice vlans (auxiliary) configured manually. So when I want to configure the voice vlan for Fa0/1 the voice vlan is set as the native one. Is it only possible to configure the native vlans with the VLAN Port Assignment of LMS 4.0 ?
I have a simple question: In 6500 CatOS, we had that feature of image synchronization, which added the ability to download the image from the active supervisor to the standby via internal TFTP of the CatOS. Can this be done on IOS? I was looking fot this over the Internet and couldn't find anything.
i'm running a 5510 asa and the vpn has been working great for a while. We recently change our network provider so i had to change the public ip, and dns on the firewall... now i can still connect via the vpn and browse accross my mpls to other sites, but cant really access anything on the native lan that the firewall resides on?
if i have this config: switch port mode trunk trunk aloved vlan 50
will travel over this trunk untagged packets? For eg the V LAN 1 is by default native V LAN without tag. If i have created a bog ring with catalyst 3560x switches with no spanning tree on V LAN 1 can be the case of this config a loop ??? I am using upper config on interfaces that are connected the switches together in ring.
Other interfaces on switch have this config: int range 0/1-4 switchport mode acc switchport acc vlan1
int range 0/5-24 switchport mode acc switchport acc vlan50
I am using vlan1 just for local switching without connection to internet! I am asking just because i have this king of messages in logs:
%CDP-4-NATIVE_VLAN_MISMATCH: Native VLAN mismatch discovered on GigabitEthernet1/0/27 (1), with SW3560x_BR8874 GigabitEthernet1/0/19 (50).
GI 1/0/27 and GI 1/0/19 have this config: switchport mode trunk trunk aloved vlan 50
I have a Windows 7 64 bit computer that is connected to the internet through an ethernet cable to a 2-wire modem. Other computers at my home are connected wirelessly but I am not. I do have a NetGear print server and connect wirelessly with it to a printer. I am suddenly getting the notification "Native WiFi Default Profile Connected" even though I have been running the computer for a year without ever seeing this.
Is the wireless USB connection over-riding my ethernet connection? and is it possible to revert to having the ethernet connection be dominant? I prefer the ethernet connection for speed.
1 week ago, I got a call from a client that reported a network outage, the client told me that, 3 switch has crashed he try to console but it just hang. I ask him, did you change something? he said he didn't change anything, he just pluged a nortelswitch to the cisco switch number 9, but that switch doesn't crash like the others (3,4,8). I check the uptime, and yes the switch never been powered off..
the topology look like this
____ 6500 ____ / / | 1 2 3 4 5 ...... 9
the vlan is end to end vlan, so vlan span between all those switches. transparant. this is collapsed topology, core and distribution is the 6500 itself all of the 1-9 access switch are in the same rack, with no loopguard, and bpdu guard configured. and connected to the core using etherchannel. the problem is there is no log available to start the troubleshooting/investigation.
I am having trouble after creating a management vlan (99) on a 3550 switch.I have configured the vlan (99) and given it an IP (192.168.1.100) and a default gateway (my router address - 192.168.1.99).I can ping to the switch from a PC and vice versa. The management VLAN IP is fine but now I cannot ping to the router from either the PC or the switch.It seems that just by adding VLAN 99 with it's own IP address has now prevented pings from the switch/ PC to the router ?Due to the fact that I have created a new switch management VLAN with an IP, does this mean I have set up the router as a 'router on a stick' scenario ? [code]