i did in past a lot of L2TP connection between two end point. in this case ans with 2911 series with ios 15 and DATA license Activated. the l2tp session does not establishe between a this 2911 and 7209. Attached is topology file and bellow the configuration of both router.
I am working in GULF and skype and other free voice services are blocked. people sometimes use vpn(ivacy) on iphone in the office and it dont work while if they use vpn at there home it works. At office we have only 2911 router and no firewal and simple NAT is done on ADSL interface.what command should be entered to bypass l2tp and pptp.
I am having one router CISCO2911/K9 (Cisco 2911 w/3 GE,4 EHWIC,2 DSP,1 SM,256MB CF,512MB DRAM,IPB). But now my management asking me to upgrade this router as CISCO2911-SEC/K9.
I have two 7206 VXR routers with the VPN Service Adapter either side of a leased line (i.e. no provider between, pure layer two connectivity)A requirement is that traffic traversing the link is encrypted so I've configured an IPSec VPN between the two endpoints.During load testing we noticed a very severe performance hit when the VPN was enabled, disabling it again saw we were able to use almost 100% of the 1000Mbs line. The performance hit looks to be due to the increased MTU size when using IPSec, possible due to fragmentation.
I've read that the 7206 VXR can support 980Mbs (or there abouts) of throughput using AES providing the MTU size is 1400.Configuring this manually on each server in each data centre isn't feasible.As the link is effectively a point to point and we have control over the MTU size between the two routers, what options are available to increase the performance when the VPN is enabled?
I am attaching my current network topology, My problem is that i am having mpls & p2p link terminated on the 7206 router left side of diagram. now my problem is if i apply PBR on this 7206 router & tracer any host which are on right side of the diagram, it drops on IP 10.1.1.1..ideally it should go to my Core switch on right of the diagram.
There is so much mis-information on the Internet and Cisco's own support site has bits and pieces everywhere (I've found at least 5 support pages in Cisco that address this subject), none work or are directly targeted at what I would consider is a major use case for this product. I can see from the many posts everywhere that getting L2TP/IPSEC to work is a major problem, requiring many configuration steps that all have to be perfect and there seems to be some trick to get it to work that most people struggle with. Most of the advice out there is impertinent and highly technical but doesn't work.
I would like to know if there is any consolidated instructions that WORK to create a VPN server on the 5505 using the ASDM and also how to set your Windows 7 (or 2008) client to work with it.
Like I've said, I've spent hours and hours on this and have yet to get anything to work. I have a brand new 5505 connected directly to DSL (static IP) that I ran the wizard on and followed the best advice I could find (by the way there's TONS of information on getting XP to work but afaik, this does NOT work for windows 7). Now that I've tried various things without success, I believe I've gotten it so fouled up I need to reset to factory defaults and start over.
I also have another brand new 5505 connected to a different DSL line. Behind that firewall, I have both windows 7 clients and windows 2008 server. I've tried lots of different things to get these to work including the registry hacks (which, if indeed is required, I seriously can't believe that Cisco hasn't given us a tool for).
I have tried to use the ASDM to do all my programming as I find the CLI to be extremely error prone and virtually incomprehensible.So, what the world needs is one place that gives all the instructions on what to do, step-by-step that really work for this simple use case of windows connecting to the ASA.
I'm trying to setup a L2TP over IPSEC vpn connection on a PIX 501 that will use key sharing. In addition, I have a PPTP connection setup which allows connectivity. Two things, the L2TP vpn client I am using does not connect and times out. The second is that the PPTP client I use does connect, but cannot ping any resources on the network.
The config on the PIX is below:
Building configuration... : Saved : PIX Version 6.3(3) interface ethernet0 auto interface ethernet1 100full nameif ethernet0 outside security0 nameif ethernet1 inside security100 enable password tdkuTUSh53d2MT6B encrypted [ Code] .....
A office use Windows Server 2008 R2 (routing and remote access) for user VPN connection.At other location B office, I want to setup a router (RV120W Wireless-N VPN Firewall) for L2TP VPN connect to A office.B office use ADSL dial connection, and set a Dynamic DNS for the router. how to configuration the L2TP VPN.
I have an 1921 that I use for L2TPv3 tunnel connection with 2 sides. I need to add others 2 sides and I thought to add an EHWIC-4ESG on my router. Can I configure different xconnections with this module? I would like to configure my router as below: [code]
I am having a Cisco 7406 VXR router. I want to know what is the max. MPLS link capacity that can be terminated on the link? We are planning to upgrade the MPLS link to 450 Mb..so was just wondering whether 7206 will support or not..
I have a problem in understanding how LLQ is implemented in different platforms of Cisco.QoS should kick in only when there is a congestion in the link irrespective of queueing / scheduling (LLQ and CBWFQ).But in certain platforms like GSR and IOS-XR, LLQ is confiugred only with priority and police command not with "prioirity percent <value>" command. In priority and police command since policer is used, LLQ is always on even there is no period of congestion. Of course with police you can re-mark the exceed traffic to different marking but thats not the requirement in my case.
In platforms like 7206, LLQ is configured with "prioirty percent <value>" which works ideally only when there is a period of congestion. When there is no congestion, LLQ class can use scanvenge other classes as well.Would like to know is there any specific reason why there is a difference in the implentation of LLQ between different platforms of Cisco.
I need to upload IOS c7200-advipservicesk9-mz.124-15.T16.binin 7206 NPE 400 router , As per cisco recommendation router should have DRAM : 256 MB ; Flash : 64I think my router contain only DRAM= 128 MB but not sure.
how much DRAM & Flash it contains.
Router1#sh versionCisco Internetwork Operating System SoftwareIOS (tm) 7200 Software (C7200-IK9S-M), Version 12.3(1a), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)Copyright (c) 1986-2003 by cisco Systems, Inc.Compiled Thu 05-Jun-03 20:58 by dchihImage text-base: 0x60008954, data-base: 0x61E0C000
I have a lot of cisco 7206 vxr deviceses. I have a high cpu problem.I have a 7206 vxr g2. I used to use ebgp for three upstream carrier. I used to bgp full route table method. I have about 800 Mbps active traffics and behing the router about 1600 active customers.
How can I trouble shoot this high cpu problem?
#sh int gigabitEthernet 0/1 GigabitEthernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is MV64460 Internal MAC, address is 000c.cf1d.d01b (bia 000c.cf1d.d01b) Description: ***** GW Interface ***** [Code]....
In Cisco 7206 VXR (NPE-G2) router , the CPU utilization is at an 80-90% always , but none of the process is consuming not more than 1%. In the show stacks output we are observing network interface interrupt is called very frequently. so what does network interface interrupt is about. Logs for the reference: show process CPU sorted
CPU utilization for five seconds: 88%/88%; one minute: 89%; five minutes: 89% PID Runtime(uS) Invoked u Secs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process 1 0 72 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Chunk Manager 2 20020000 17159 1166 0.00% 0.02% 0.01% 0 Load Meter [Code]...
I have a stable l2tp/ipsec config that I have been using for many years with the Windows XP native VPN client and the iPhone VPN client.This configuration does not seem to work with the native Windows 7 VPN client. What has changed between XP and 7 on the native VPN client front? I'm running IOS 12.4(15)T5.
I have configure L2TP vpn using ASDM and now i am not able to connect my Cisco ASA 5505. it's showing error message 3Jul 07 201118:57:38IP = *.*.*.*, Error processing payload: Payload ID: 1
I have a Cisco 7200 and need to establish L2TP over IPSEC session with a Draytek Fly200. Draytek must use L2TP over IPSEC to provide LAN-to-LAN connectivity. IPSEC phase 1 and 2 is ok, L2TP tunnel is also established, but on cloned virtual-access IPCP negotiation is not completed:
*Sep 16 09:50:36.911: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Virtual-Access3, changed state to up L2X_ADJ: Vi3:midchain adj reqd for ip 0.0.0.0, cid 0 *Sep 16 09:50:38.911: Vi3 IPCP: O CONFREQ [REQsent] id 2 len 10 *Sep 16 09:50:38.911: Vi3 IPCP: Address 192.168.176.2 (0x0306C0A8B002) *Sep 16 09:50:38.911: Vi3 IPCP: Event[Timeout+] State[REQsent to REQsent]
I think my VPDN configuration from Cisco side is not correct, but I cannot find configuration examples for this kind of solution.
I have a 5510 that i have configured for L2TP over IPSEC, not using AnyConnect. The first, and most prevelant being, VPN clients are unable to ping/access any of the hosts that are assigned a static NAT from the inside interface to the outside interface. I was able to circumvent this by adding another static NAT to the public interface for the incoming clients, but this caused intermittent connectivity issues with inside hosts. The second issue involves DNS. I have configured two DNS servers, both of which reside on the internal network and are in the split_tunnel ACL for VPN clients, but no clients are using this DNS. What is the workaround for using split tunneling AND internal DNS servers, if any?
i've had two different CCNA's look at this numerous times to no avail. A ping from a VPN client to any internal host works fine, unless it is one that is NAT'd. You can see in the config where i added the extra STATIC NAT to try and fix the issue. And this works perfectly across the tunnel but only intermittenly from the internal 10.1.4.x network. [code]
Co-worker just got a Blackberry Playbook tablet and, try as I might, we cannot get the darn thing to successfully set up a working IPSEC/L2TP vpn tunnel to our ASA 5510, which acts as a multi-purpose VPN concentrator. Any luck setting up L2TP/IPSEC VPN to ASA from Blackberry Playbook?
Cisco ASA 5505 ver 8.4. Most things work but now I want to setup a vpn connection..I have done this 2 ways, first by using the "VPN Wizard" in ASDM and then 5 hours later removing everything and configuring from cli. And it just doesn't work, client (WinXP & Win7) gets "error 792" and sometimes "error 789" (both indicating problem with phase 1, I'm pretty sure of that) Googling on those gives a few suggestions none works. All I get in the log on Cisco is the "Error processing payload: Payload ID: 1" Google on that only comes up with a few pages telling me this message is caused by an error. (Yeah, I could never have guessed...) For the cli config, I followed this tutorial carefully (3 times actually...) url...I'm using PSK for IPSec, entered same on Cisco and client - checked several times, this is not a password/PSK issue. Ports opened on Cisco: 500, 1701, 4500 (For a try I opened all ports, no change.) And here's the "show run". [code]
I'm opening a new topic related to my problem with the VPN connection, to avoid confusion, since there are many, in the old information, no longer required.
I would like to configure my ASA5510 L2PT/IpSec to accept connections from Windows clients. I happen to authenticate via AD credentials. When I try to connect is because the error 691. I enabled debugging on the machine the following:
I have a scenario with a Cisco 6506 and a 7206. The 6506 is running BGP and peers with our data center router. The 7206 is a stub router off the 6506 and is used as an edge router for customer T1 circuits. I want to use OSPF between the routers to exchange connected and static routes. The problem I have is that static BGP null routes on the 6506 are overriding the OSPF routes being received from the 7206. Example: The 6506 is advertising a class C network 192.168.1.0/24 to our data center. The 6506 does not utilize the 192.168.1.0/24 network. It is only used on the 7206 for customer T1 circuits and is carved up into /29 subnets. So the 6506 has a static route: ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 null 0. Today the routing is accomplished with static routes on the 6506 for the 192.168.1.0 networks on the 7206. Using OSPF the 7206 advertises /29 links back to the 6506, but when I withdraw one of the /29 static routes from the 6506, the /24 null route takes precedence over the more specific /29 routes and the traffic is black-holed on the 6506. how can I get the OSPF routes to look preferable to the /24 null route on the 6506?
I would like to find out what the status is of the Cisco 7204 VXR and 7206 VXR routers?I understand they are EOLife and EOSale.Are they also EOSupport? we planning to upgrade 3 of them in our environment and management requires feedback around this.We thinking of going the ASR1000 route..
One of end costumers is trying to configure IP Accounting on 7206 running version 12.4(4)XD8,The issue we are having is that while the physical interface is up (the sub interface is part of a metro line which is directly connected) we dont see packets being accounted if the destination IP is down.
We have a router (7206) which connected to client device in /30 IP segment, but this device is a switch which connected to many more devices. Doing packet capture on our router interface unravel many ARP requests whcih comes from the client switch. Is there any feature or command which we can stop this?
I have an outside 7206 router that is configured with BGP. Behind that I have an ASA 5520 with a failover. Everytime my primary ISP goes down I have to failover the ASA to restablish a connection to the secondary ISP. When the primary comes back on line I have to fail it over again. I have had Cisco TAC look at the ASA and they didn't see anything misconfigured on the ASA. Doesn't seem to be any problems with the router config either.