Cisco WAN :: Router 2951 Is Suitable For 100 Mbps MPLS Link?
Aug 28, 2011I want a router to terminate 100Mbps MPLS link on it. Can Cisco 2951 will be suitable for this or i have to go on to 3900 series or 7200 series
View 2 RepliesI want a router to terminate 100Mbps MPLS link on it. Can Cisco 2951 will be suitable for this or i have to go on to 3900 series or 7200 series
View 2 RepliesInstallation of 2 x 4 Mbps MPLS circuit on primary router (CISCO 2951) and 1 x 8 Mbps Ethernet link on secondary router (Cisco 2951). We have successfully implement the primary router with 2 x 4 Mbps MPLS circuit. Site is having two computer room CR1 and CR2 and distance between both room is 200mts. CR1 is having primary core router and primary core switch where the service provider terminated the new MPLS circuit and we have done the successful implementation. CR2 is having Secondary core router and secondary core switch where we needs to have the termination of Ethernet link but service provider has delivered the Ethernet link on the CR1 which is incorrect DMARC Location.
Both the computer rooms are connected via optical copper can we use that copper to connect the circuit on CR2, as per my understanding we can use the optical fiber to connect the wind circuit on secondary router on CR2 by using the media connector.
My query is whether cisco 2900 (specifically 2951) will support more than 2 Mbps link (i.e either through ethernet or serial)?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCan Cisco2951 work as an MPLS router. If yes what will be needed to make it function as an MPLS router? Else which alternative router can function as an MPLS router.
View 1 Replies View RelatedRegion : UnitedKingdom
Model : TL-MR3220
Hardware Version : Not Clear
im currently on three netowork usb dongle e3231 and wanting to setup a WiFi network using this dongle would the mr 3220 be a suitable router for my three dongle? also on the tp link site it says the router is battery operated is this the case as im sure it loooks like theres an adaptor plug on the back.
Purchased and configured 2951 router based on Telco specs that required T3/DS3 card with coax connection for MPLS. When telco showed up to install DS3 they handed me a UTP copper connection.... Can I use one of the Gigabit ethernet connections on the 2951 as my MPLS interface into the provider's cloud?
View 2 Replies View Relatedsetting up MPLS on a single T3 line. A client has contacted us to set up a 2951 at a branch location. There are 5 locations connected with MPLS.They will split off 4meg of the T3 for mpls. The rest of the 45meg would go to the internet.They have two 1841's currently set up with a T1 line in each. One 1841 connects to the MPLS and the other to the internet.When the T3 is turned up by the provider, everything, internet and MPLS, will go through it. I asked for the current configurations, but I have not received them yet and this setup is due in a couple days.Given I've never configured MPLS before and I have a rudimentary understanding of how it works, any tips or configurations? I'd hate to be stuck on site and not equipped to complete the job.
View 3 Replies View Related300 M bps drops to 150 M bps when it recycle power. I met all requirements for 300 M bps connection this happen only in 2.4 g Hz Band width.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI just ran some speedtests om my PC on the advice of my isp to see if my Linksys WRT54G router might be bad. As a result, I found that the router might not be entirely bad, but it might not be entirely good, either. I got .77 Mbps dowload and .17 Mbps upload on the first speedtest. I got .43 Mbps download on the second speedtest and the speed test hung hear the end. When I connected an IMac to the cable modem with an ethernet cable, the IMac ran strong. So the tech thought I should get a new router.
But wait a minute, isn't there a network adapter in the PC that the router talks to? Might the adapter be the problem, not the router? So I speedtested the wireless network to the IMac. That speedtest was fine, tiptop, like the ethernet direct connection test noted above. Did that tell me that the problem is in my PC network adapter, not the router? Then, I retested (speedtested) the connection on the PC and it was fine...excellent. Good up and down speeds, no hangs.Then, I checked the PC adapter (a Belkin). I saw three adapters on Device Manager, including the Belkin. I downloaded new drivers for the adapters (except for the Microsoft Virtual WiFi Minipoty Adapter - because it got a warning that the download software wasn't signed and might harm my computer).
So I have installed my new E4200 version 1 and I am disappointed with the speeds. My computer has a wireless N card and gigabit Ethernet compatibility. I am currently getting a miserly 54 mbs wireless and 100 mbs on the wire (connected with cat6 all the way)... Anything I should try to get close to advertized speeds?
View 9 Replies View RelatedI just upgraded my cable modem from the Motorola Sufboard 5120 to the DOCSIS 3.0 capable 6120. Provisioned it with Comcast and their "Blast" service (supposedly it caps at 16 down, 2 up).
I had, in the past, used my desktop via N-format wireless (DWA-525 N-format PCI adapter and DIR-655 N-format router) to do a speedtest.net test. I was getting 16 down and 2 up (as advertised). When I switched to the 6120, I did a speedtest.net test again to see what kind of gains, if any, I was getting. Turns out, I was getting 20+ down (nice improvement) and 1/2 Mbps up (a fourth of what I used to be getting?). Called Comcast. They "sent signals" (don't they always?) and claimed that it fixed it. My download speeds increased a smidge (about 22), but my upload speeds were still .5. Called Motorola, they had me do a few things and now I get 1 Mbps up and 27 - 30 down via wireless.
My download speeds are great. I'm content with that. If I hardwire from the cable modem directly to a ****py old laptop, a speedtest.net shows 4 Mbps up. So why do I get such a high upload speed when hardwired (4 Mbps), but a fraction of it (1/4th) when wireless? I'm not using any other devices to sap bandwidth (some are connected -- i.e. another desktop, my Droid phone, etc., but aren't actively pulling packets). And why would it go from 2 up (on my desktop via wireless in the past) to only 1 up (via wireless now) when the setup is the same across the board (as best I recall) other than upgrading my cable modem.
Since I get 4 up when hardwired straight off the cable modem, I assume my DIR-655 is slowing me down somehow. How to pick up the pace a bit? I've already tried the standard "power cycling", etc.
Oh, and the reason I go wireless -- my cable modem and wireless router are in my game room in the basement for my PS3. My desktop computer (and the wife's desktop computer) are two floors directly above it in our "office". Signal strength is "excellent" ... always has been. And again, pretty much everything is the same.
[URL]
In other words. If my cable modem only has 50 mbps is that all I will get out of my wireless router, even if the router has a higher mbps rating/
View 8 Replies View RelatedWhich is the wireless speed of this router? No speed infos are present in the official web site. In the web some sites say it's a 300, others say it's a 150, others 248...
View 9 Replies View RelatedI have P router (7206VXR) and I need to export netflow from its MPLS interfaces to the netflow software.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have 6 sites which are connected through E1 links.All sites connected from HQs.
Site A is HQs.
Sited B, C, D, E, and F are Branches.
Site A is directly connected with site B, C, D and E.
Site D is connected with Site F.
Now we have another redundant E1 link for site C and Site F.we are using Static Routes.i have configured Qualified-next-hope on Juniper Router but i am unable to configure IP SLA on Site C Cisco 2951 with IOS 15.0 router.is there another solution for my scenario plz share with me for Redundant Link.
I have a desktop and laptop here, the desktop being mine custom built wireless and all, and my buddies desktop.The issue that I'm having is that my desktop, regardless of wired or wireless gets 25 mbps down speed, and the laptop gets only 2.5 mbps down speed wired or wireless
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have done a bunch of research in trying to re-use an old card/router for testing our new MPLS link. I have a 45m DS3 and was wondering if the PA-MC-T3= card will work UN-channelized. I have tried the "no channelized" command under the controller to no avail. I believe that the card only works for channelized T1's.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm using an HP G60 laptop, running Win 7 Pro x64 SP1, fully patched. I'm usually in the home office, connected to a D-Link DIR-615 router (h/w: E3, f/w: 5.10, the latest). The internal Atheros AR9285 N150 wireless adapter has never been as reliable as I'd like, so decided to purchase a USB N300 adapter. I bought a TP-Link model for $10 and started using it. For some reason, it would only connect at 150, unless I ran the router's Web interface and saved the wireless settings, even without a change, at which point I'd see 300 Mbps. However, at the next restart after hibernation, the connection with the DIR-615 would fall back to 150.
I stepped on the TP-Link USB adapter and broke it. Oops. Decided to purchase a D-Link DWA-131 (h/w: A1, f/w: 1.21, the latest) 'cause it's compact and the box says that, "For Optimal Wireless Performance +Use With Wireless N 300 Router (DIR-615)."Expected 300 Mbps, but it connected at 65. Argh. Did the trick again with the DIR-615's Web interface, and saw 150. But after restart from hibernation, back down to 65. Unable to achieve 300 Mbps, unlike the cheap-o TP-Link adapter. Router is configured according to Lycan's sticky note. Router's Wireless Status shows a signal of 39%, and the router is in the next room in a wood-framed building.Is this as good as it can be? Looks like the DWA-131 is coupla years old with no new drivers for Win 7. Ran the DSL Reports Java speed test, and seeing 18+ Mbps d/l, and 1.8 Mbps u/l, which is about average from Cox here in The OC. If I can't get a faster connection, then D-Link's claim of "optimal performance" is misleading.
I have few inter-AS and Hub & Spoke MPLS L3VPNs up and running but, all of them uses plain IPv4 on the PE-to-CE connecting interfaces for switching the L3VPN customer traffic. While, this is ok to route traffic between customer sites over a ISP backbone using the VRF and MP-BGP/LDP configurations which does the MPLS forwarding in the ISP backbone, i would like to know, how to enable MPLS forwarding on the PE-CE links as well to make it MPLS right from CE1 - PE1 - P - PE2 - CE2 all the way for the VPN traffic.
This way, even the last mile access to CE devices will be an MPLS link over a Ethernet PHY so that, the traffic originating from CE1 to CE 2 will be carried on a MPLS tagged Ethernet frame instead of IPoEthernet frame.
i have 2 routers 2811 interconnected together ,1 of these router running in circuit with 2 Mbps over Internet the 2nd one use MPLS Circuit with a bandwidth of 4Mbps,how configure the routing to route over the MPLS while IPSec act as standby
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have 2811 Cisco ISR and two ISP links - one is 8 Mbps and the second is 4 Mbps. The question is - is it possible to aggregate link speed up to 12 Mbps?
View 4 Replies View RelatedQoS on an MFR interface/subinterfaces. We have a remote site with two bundled T1's terminating on a 2951 router for a total bandwidth of 3072. The circuit is provided by Paetec and the subinterfaces are designated for internet and MPLS traffic respectively. The issue we are facing is with outbound voice quality. It seems that no matter how we apply QoS, either to the main MFR interface or the MFR subinterfaces, voice packets do not seem to be prioritized. We tried FRTS, which slowed the entire link down to a crawl, we tried applying a class map to the main interface as well as a service policy, none of which seemed to affect anything.
class-map match-all VOICE
match ip dscp ef
class-map match-any SIGNALING
match ip dscp af31
match ip dscp cs3 (code)
Been plauged with some slow speeds lately and decided to check the speeds, with cable in modem i have 4.9 mbps upload but when i go through the router i have 0.3 mbps. Router is relatively new, just a couple months, firmware 8.00.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI know that this Router of D-Link DIR-655 can't handle 450 Mbps Wireless Connection.
What is the newest D-Link Router available that can handle 450 Mbps Wireless Connection? Does the Network Wireless Adapters need to be change to achieve this?
TRENDnet 450 Mbps Wireless N Gigabit Router TEW-691GR (Piano Black)
[URL]
I'm looking to sit the ICND2 exam soon and have discovered that the pair of old 2924XL switches are not going to cut the mustard for the newer vlan commands and other features.
Would a pair of WS-C3550-24-SMI switches be a sensible replacement for ICND2 and possibly up to CCNP? They are available on ebay for about £80 each.
How to calculate aggregate bandwidth of MPLS link. Is there any tool available for the same.
View 3 Replies View Relatedmy problem is that i have a computer connected via gigabit lan with a cat5e cable.i have a notebook with a d-link dwa-140 usb wifi adapter connected.and the max transfer speed i get is 14 mbps. d-link dir-655 firmware 1.34eu.in windows it reports 300mbps.in the router it reports 270 mbps sometimes 300. the settings in the router is 40mhz only,. ch 13. wpa2 aes. as described in the sticky.the devices are within 3 ft of each other.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am having cisco asa 5520 with internet having public ip and cisco 2911 with mpls link in my office. the mpls link is between my HO and my branchmi am putting my webserver in the branch side i want to port forward one of my publicip in my office to be forwarded to branch we, server.is it poosible on the firewall ouside the local network.
View 3 Replies View RelatedRunning ASA5585’s in active/standby across a local campus MPLS network. Supported design, leading practice etc. Specifically our design is that two ASA5585 are configured as active/standby through a local campus MPLS network over 10gig links through ASR9k etc. The ASA’s are providing inter-vrf routing capability only with p2p l2vpn circuits configured for each logical interface between the ASA over MPLS etc.The failover link is via a direct fibre and the state link will be through a p2p l2vpn (option for direct fibre also)Is this a supported design to begin with?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a Netgear CG3100 modem hooked up to a Netgear WNR2000 router. Both are sending out signals, the CG3100 on channel 11 at 40 Mhz and the WNR2000 on channel 1 at 20/40 Mhz. I keep the WNR for legacy devices while the CG is for N devices only. They don't seem to interfere with each other much.Currently my computer is the only device connected to the modem wirelessly, with the only wired connection being the router. As I write this, the connection has actually dropped to 26 Mbps in the Wireless Network Connection Status window. I understand that this number drops under network load, but there doesn't seem to be any at the moment. If I go into the control panel and simply click apply, the connection jumps back up to 150 Mbps. However, this always drops back down, sometimes immediately, sometimes after a few minutes. It usually settles down at 72 Mbps, sometimes 54 Mbps.My wireless adapter is an ASUS PCE-N13 with v3.2.7.0 Ralink drivers. OS is Windows 7 64-bit.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have 100 Mbps Half Duplex on one side of the Switch. ( Autonegotiation disabled )I have 10 Mbps Full Duplex on the other side ( Auto-negotiation disabled ). Should the link come up on both sides
View 4 Replies View RelatedWe have a ME6524 running as a MPLS P router. We want to mirror a port to capture a specific traffic stream (to a probe). As the port is an MPLS LDP port will this work, will both the VACL and SPAN work with MPLS tagged packets, or does the mirror and VACL work after the labels have been removed..?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am using URL Snooper to copy URLs from slide share into my hard drive. Although my internet connection is working fine i am getting the message"ERROR:failed to find a suitable network driver". I cannot understand what the problem is" Please assit me in this issu
View 1 Replies View Related