i have a branch router that connects to mpls WAN. Also has a second interface that is used for dmvpn failover in case WAN goes down.We want to use this second interface also as the primary internet circuit for the branch. I changed the default route to the next hop address on the other side of the second interface and expected this to work.But i was told i need to set up NAT for this to work, and set up an ACL for NAT to use. how to set up NAT?
I've setup a NTP service by using Cisco 2811 routers. This works fine at the moment, but in the end there are some questions left.
1. I'm using two 2811 Routers, one for primary, which is resceiving the time from PUBLIC NTP 1, and one for backup, which is resceiving the time from PUBLIC NTP 2. Is it possible to compare these to times an check if the match? And if not, generate an alarm via e.g. SNMP
2. Is it possible to check via SNMP, if the routers are reaching PUBLIC NTP 1 and PUBLIC NTP 2 for sync?
I'm trying to setup a SSL VPN on a 2811. I believe I have the SSL VPN portion understood, but I can't tell because I keep getting stuck on the Certificate Server, ca trustpoint and identity trustpoint configuration.
guide that walks you through the CA cert, Cert Server, ca trustpoint and identitiy trustpoint to ios SSL VPN?
I am pretty new to the configuration of a DMZ and I have the task of setting one up.I have a Cisco 2811 Router running Cisco IOS Software, 2800 Software (C2800NM-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 12.4(24)T1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3), 2 FE interfaces.One FE is connected to the WAN, with a loop back interface configured with the public IP for Internet access in the office.The other FE has 2 sub interfaces configured, one for data and the other for voice traffic.Users within the office are configured to use the data VLAN to access the internet through the WAN.
Now we are setting up some new services and we require to have DMZs setup.I want to setup 3 zones now that the different servers would reside in. How can i achieve this using the existing infrastructure I have?I have an idea to create more subinterfaces and assign them to the zones, but I am still not sure how this would play out. I have been on this for the whole day and unable to make significant progress.
I got connected ASA ----- ROUTER 2811) to metroethernet switch from my ISP , with a 4MB of bandwidth but the internet connections to all my LAN has been frozen and we lost connection to the internet, to restart the internet service I need to boot the ROUTER 2811 - and ISP switch to rollback the internet operation,My ISP support tell me if is possible to set up the traffic bandwidth in one or both borders devices, ( ASA 5510 or ROUTER 2811)
I am trying to setup a L2L IPSec VPN between cisco VPN3020 concentrator and Cisco 2811 something is not working and I don't understand why.I describe my situation in detail my router has 2 interfaces
External interface Fa 0/1 ip 193.P.Q.R Internal interface Fa 0/0 141.G.H.254 Lan on internal interface is 141.G.H.0/24
remote VPN concentrator has 2 interfaces
Public interface 131.A.B.C Private interface 131.A.I.E
I have to set up L2L so that host 141.G.H.10 can talk to host 131.A.H.D whici is behind the VPN concentrator my router config:
crypto isakmp policy 3 encr 3des hash md5 authentication pre-share group 2crypto isakmp key * address 131.A.B.C!crypto ipsec transform-set presid-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac !crypto map presid-map 5 ipsec-isakmp set peer 131.A.B.C set transform-set presid-set match address presid!interface FastEthernet0/1 ip address 193.P.Q.R 255.255.255.252 duplex full speed 100 crypto map presid-map!interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 141.G.H.254 255.255.255.0 duplex auto speed auto! ip access-list extended presid permit ip host 141.G.H.10 host 131.A.H.D ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 193.P.Q.S
Then I configured VPN3020 accordingly creating a lan to lan profile with the proper IKE proposals ecc ecc when interesting traffic is matched by VPN acl (presid) I see this messages in the VPN concentrator logs:
57101 02/23/2011 15:49:05.310 SEV=4 IKE/119 RPT=4033 193.P.Q.R Group [193.P.Q.R]PHASE 1 COMPLETED 57102 02/23/2011 15:49:05.310 SEV=4 AUTH/22 RPT=3935 193.P.Q.R User [193.P.Q.R] Group [193.P.Q.R] connected, Session Type: IPSec/LAN-to-LAN 57104 02/23/2011 15:49:05.310 SEV=4 AUTH/84 RPT=11 LAN-to-LAN tunnel to headend device 193.P.Q.R connected 57110 02/23/2011 15:49:54.820 SEV=4 IKE/123 RPT=1093 193.P.Q.R Group [193.P.Q.R]IKE lost contact with remote peer, deleting connection (keepalive type: DPD) 57112 02/23/2011 15:49:54.820 SEV=5 IKE/194 RPT=3778 193.P.Q.R Group [193.P.Q.R]Sending IKE Delete With Reason message: Connectivity to Client Lost. 57114 02/23/2011 15:49:54.820 SEV=4 AUTH/23 RPT=14 193.P.Q.R User [193.P.Q.R] Group [193.P.Q.R] disconnected: duration: 0:00:49 57115 02/23/2011 15:49:54.820 SEV=4 AUTH/85 RPT=11 LAN-to-LAN tunnel to headend device 193.P.Q.R disconnected: duration: 0:00:49
and from router side I See this with show crypto isakmp sa
131.A.B.C 193.P.Q.R CONF_XAUTH 5 0 ACTIVE
but the status got stuck in CONF_XAUTH state and then disconnects?
I would like to set up a POTS Dial connection between 2 Cisco routers, using the modem card WIC-1AM-V2. I'd like to use this as an out-of-band connection to a remote site, if the primary internet connection fails. So, this setup will only be used in one direction, 1 router placing calls, the other one receiving calls.Here's my config of the receiving router:
chat-script dial "" ATZ AT OK "ATX3D T" ATS0=8 TIMEOUT 120 CONNECT C interface Async0/2/0 description out of band for network no ip address encapsulation slip async mode interactive line 0/2/0 session-timeout 5 absolute-timeout 10 script connection dial login local modem InOut transport input all escape-character BREAK autoselect ppp stopbits 1 speed 115200 flowcontrol hardware
This config is working fine, when dialing in via a Windows Hyperterminal Dial connection. After a while of dialing I get the login prompt of the router.Now I want to have a router placing calls instead of a Windows Server. I can't figure out how to tell a router to place calls to a POTS phone number.
Is there a way to set up Quick VPN on the RV120W without changing the internal subnet? I have just taken over responsibility for a network and I don't know all of the nooks and crannies yet, so I'd rather not change the internal sub net. I've tried setting up a user then changing the LAN settings afterward, but it automatically removed the VPN user when I did so.
I've just purchased a couple of SRP527W routers. I've been unable to even browse to the default 192.168.15.1 to start my configuration. My local network is 192.168.1.x. At risk of showing my stupidity, what am I doing wrong.
My setup is ISP-2811-PIX 515E-LAN. Right now, I am doing a PAT for IPSEC tunnels to terminate on the PIX. Do you recommend I use the 2811 instead of PIX for VPN or keep things the way it is? Trying to determine the best box to use.
I want to upgrade LMS 3.2 to 4.1. But when I look to "Special Notes and Exceptions for Devices Supported" document ,It seems that 2811 have 2 SysID.
Why there are two IDs for the same hardware and under which ID will my 2811 routers be classified into inventory database. This information is important since customer want to have support of 2811 in CiscoView of LMS 4.1 (around 200 devices).
I have a particular site that is causing me trouble, this site is connected in a back to back configuration using 2811 at CO and 2621XM at CPE. The CO end is also the CO for 3 other sites so has a total of 4 wics installed (WIC-1SHDSL-v2), these other sites also have 2621XMs for the CPE.
The problem i am getting is when one site in particular transfers large files to/from client machines, the CPU on the 2811 jumps to 99%:
CPU utilization for five seconds: 99%/98%; one minute: 26%;
I have a Cisco 2811 with an additional HWIC-4ESW card. [code] I need to NAT anything heading out of the WAN port. [code] I can ping anything connected to my other private networks from my 10.0.24.0 network but nothing on the Internet. [code]
I just bought an additional router for my network and I'm in the process of setting it up.I have however hit a snag with enabling ssh on the device. It is a cisco router 2811 running IOS 15.0 (refer below to my attempts)
I have a 2811 ISR configured to provide the following services to my network: Internet access to LAN usersCisco Call Manager ExpressSite-to-stie VPN to 3rd party networksVPN server to provide VPN access to remote usersSecurity Zone configurationsStatic NAT configurations.Now I recently just got the ASA5510 device and I am not sure how to go about with the setup, whether to put the ASA in between the internet and the ISR (Internet - ASA - ISR - LAN), or put the ISR in between the internet and the ASA (Internet - ISR - ASA - LAN)? While i know I can move most of the config unto the ASA, i know that the CME cannot be moved, hence I would like to do the setup such that users on the network still have access to CME.
I have a site that is connected to the internet via T1 into 2811 runing C2800NM-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 12.4(11)X. I have noticed that when i do a port scan on the outside nat pool i see well know ports in the closed state .ie...7,21,22,23,25,99,100,80,443. These pools for end users to access internet. Does this pose a security risk? What can i change to provide end user access to web but not let these well know ports open?
I have a Cisco 2811 router with two HWIC-ADSL cards configured for dsl connection. I have two lines from the same ISP and i am load balancing between them. I have created a couple of SLA's to check the state of the connections and add to the routing table the two default routes if both are up or any one of them is up.My problem is that when i try to download big files (especially antivirus updates) the download at some point stops (especially the antivirus exits with an error of unreachability). If i shut down one line everything works fine.Could i use something (configuration-wise) to prevent this problem from happening?????Is there any way i can combine the two lines? They are simple ADSL connctions with static ip's.
I want to create a VPN between two PC's, (the server "Data" and "Remote Desktop" check the topology below), the Router Clabeck (cisco 2811 ) is connected to the internet through int f0/0 using a PPPoE connection and connects all the LAN PC's by PAT to the internet (you can see all the configurations in the Show Run below), the "Remote Desktop" is any PC with internet connection.
F0/1 F0/0 DATA--------------------SW-------------------ROUTER(Cisco 2811)---------------------INTERNET---------------REMOTE DESKTOP 192.168.1.51 192.168.1.254 188.8.131.52 192.168.1.1 Current configuration : 2116 bytes ! version 12.4 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec
I am currently configuring a number of cisco 2811 routers that require the BGP exterior routing protocol, however the IOS version (12.4) currently installed does not support the bgp protocol.After entering the commands into the cisco CLI 'protocol not in this image' is returned.
how many extra interface port can be plugged in to the 2811 router ,there are 2 fixed FE port on this router and i have 3 connection i.e one mpls link , one internet link and one sip trunk .. some body confirm me that i can insert module in 2811 ?
I have a 2811 that is really hitting the CPU hard. Nothing shows on CPU processes. It has an IPsec VPN tunnel back to HQ which also has a 2811 that terminates the VPN. The HQ has 2-3 IPsec tunnels to other remote sites. The CPU at the HQ avg 50% utilization during business hrs, peaks at about 80%. The remote one is very high 95% peaks, avg 80%-95% during business hours with bandwidth utilization of only 10-20Mbps. I read somewhere that its possible that fragmentation could be causing this. My question is, if I set the MTU to 1450 on the remote, I am guessing I will need to do all the other routers as well, the HQ and other remote sites? Siince they use the same outside interface to my HQ, is that correct?
Is there a way to allocate CPU or memory resources to specific processes - similar to a QoS-style configuration where you can prioritize the processes being handled by the CPU? We have a 2811 router whose CPU periodically spikes to 100% utilization. At these times, all of our EIGRP neighbor adjacencies bounce - either a peer goodbye is received or the hold time expires.
Our thinking is that we could possibly tell the router to prioritize the EIGRP process with the CPU so that routing is maintained, even though we realize other processes (like qos or ISAKMP for our tunnels) may suffer.