Cisco WAN :: Unable To Clear Line Vty On 7609
Nov 16, 2012I cannot eliminate the lines vty in my Cisco 7609 router when I write show users, I obtain the following thing: [code]
View 2 RepliesI cannot eliminate the lines vty in my Cisco 7609 router when I write show users, I obtain the following thing: [code]
View 2 RepliesI ran across this today on a 7200 that when all the vty lines are filled, and dont release, you enter clear line vty x and it is supposed to release the line. Well in some versions it doesn't work.
Here is the work around I found. clear tcp line vty x
I am trying to configure traffic policing on a 7609 with ES20 line card - however it doesn't appear to be working. The customer is randomly getting DoS attacked, and the policy doesn't appear to be dropping any exceed/violate traffic.This is an egress policy on a sub-interface.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have dsl and my buddy is about a mile through the fields with a couple tree lines, is there any way parabolic antennas will work for me ?
View 2 Replies View RelatedOn my old 2511 access server, I could issue "clear line x" to close a session on an existing line.this doesn't seem to work on my new 2600XM with NM-16A access server (12.3(20)IOS), any command in newer IOS?
View 4 Replies View Relatedhow to clear vty line? Please see below. A sh tcp <line number> shows that the TCB is waiting for TCP Process. The TCP processs TCB is waiting for is SSH. I believe because of this ssh process still running, the vty line cannot be cleared.
sh users
Line User Host(s) Idle Location
1 vty 0 pf 10.10.20.8 9w1d 10.10.1.54
2 vty 1 pf 10.10.1.16 35w0d 10.10.1.54
3 vty 2 pf 10.10.1.16 1y14w 10.10.1.54
[code].....
Cisco 7609 Router, Enable password unable to reset.
Many times CTRL+BREAK Key combination while booting the router does not takes the console to ROMMON.
Router boots using the IOS image in the bootdisk0: (For entering into the ROMMON, removed both the external Flash disks also - no use)
2 or three time in a day it enters in to the ROMMON while pressing CTRL+BREAK.
Tried in the ROMMON (one Sup is removed) with confreg 0x2142 followed by reset/boot commands, the router is booting with the startup config.
I was working on a Cisco 2600 series router earlier today running IOS 12.4. I ran into an issue where I could not clear the startup-config. I tried:
router#erase startup-config
router#reload
router#erase nvram
router#reload
[code]....
each time IP addresses and things got cleared but other aspects did not which should have been. In the nvram there were several files:
Router#dir
Directory of nvram:/
126 -rw- 2143 <no date> startup-config
127 ---- 5 <no date> private-config
128 -rw- 2143 <no date> underlying-config
1 ---- 49 <no date> persistent-data
2 -rw- 0 <no date> ifIndex-table
I tried to clear monitor session on 6500 and keep on getting the following error:
%Another session parameters or permit-list is being configured %Please wait for another configuration to complete.
how i can go about clearing the monitor session.
i am unable to configure my netgear router with my clear modem
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe are using Cisco VPN Client 5.0.07.0290 to connect to our servers. We have Sonicwall NSA2400 FW and we have 2 ISPs. We have configured the Load balancing on Firewall in 'Spill-Over' mode.
So whenever the 1st ISP Line is on full load it will automatically moves the users on 2nd line.The problem we are facing here is users who are getting IP from 1st ISP Line they are smoothly able to connect to Cisco VPN client but the users who are getting IP from 2nd ISP Line they are not able to connect to Cisco VPN Client. This is really annoying as everyone should be able to connect.
As part of our PCI compliance, we were required to add a line to all of our ACLs in our ASA 5520 running version 8.2(3). Though there is an implicit deny all, we had to add a line to deny from any source to any destination.We had no problems in adding the additional deny all statements except for our NAT access-list. This NAT access list is used for our internet connection.Currently, the NAT ACL has 4 entries to permit from a specified source to destination any. This ACL is then called on our NAT statement.nat (inside) 1 access-list NAT,Also, note that NAT control is in place and we also have NAT zero statements for our VPN connections.So to fulfill our requirements, we just had to add another line to our ACL entries. But we encountered an issue with our NAT acl.
View 10 Replies View RelatedCisco 2500 series access servers show line usage with the "show line" command:
View 2 Replies View RelatedThe reason is i want to know the difference between the leased line and the DSL line. The whole thing behind the confusion is, We plan to have a high speed internet connection in our office. We will don't have a branch office or some thing like that. I preffered to have high speed internet in our office. I found in some website that Lease line will have high speed connectivity(Upto 10Gbps). Can i use the lease line or DSL is enough for our office. Our office contains of 82 user who will use internet.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a scenario with 2 7609s connected through a MPLS service with 10 GE. In each7609 we have a 24 port channelized T1 Circuit Emulation Over Card.
The requirement is in 2 parts. First, we need to provide a T1 emulation service between the 2 7609s T1 cards.
The second requirement is that in one end there is an OC3 port, so the customer wants to send the traffic from this emulated T1 onto the OC3.
I am currently setting up a new VRF on a Cisco 7609 which is advertising (as a RR-Client) an iBGP route to a Juniper MX960. This route is then getting sent back to the default route table on the 7609 but rejected due to the cluster-id loop prevention. Although not ideal I need this route to be visible in both tables.Is there a way of changing the bgp cluster-id per VRF rather than just globally?
View 2 Replies View RelatedWhat are the prerequisites before doing this? I have to upgrade a router this week if there is an opportunity to move it to a code that is more current that the one the client is currently running which is 12.2(33)SRD4. I see on the Cisco Support site that after this code, everything moves to 15.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have a router 7609 with Supervisor Engine 720 (WS-SUP720-3B) (Policy Feature Card 3 and MSFC3 Daughterboard) and We have to configure QoS over a FastEthernet interface on a WS-X6148-RJ-45. When I try to apply the policy command I get the next log:
#service-policy output TEST_QOSbandwidth percent command is not supported in output direction for this interfaceConfiguration failed on: FastEthernet1/2 What kind of hardware and software requirements I need on my router to perfom QoS over ethernet interfaces?
Configuring MPLS over GRE tunnels. I did not find any proper configuration example. I need to do this for encrypt the traffic between two PE routers. I have 7609 routers.
View 20 Replies View RelatedI have a hight CPU utilisation problem in my CISCO7609-S routers. the cpu utilisation can rise 99% et this is usually. In the moment of hight CPU the the process CPU give the following:
the show processe cpu history give: show version
i have a problem of high cpu on my CISCO 7609 cased by LMS 3.2. I have captured the trafic flowing between LMS and the router,
View 2 Replies View RelatedFirst and foremost, what I have are 2 x 7204VXR (Gateways), 1 x 4507R-E (Coreswitch), and our ISP have 7609.Got some issues with redundancy with our ISP.
7609
I I
I I
7204-A 7204-B
| |
| vrrp |
| |
-4507R-E-
|
|
internal network
Both outside interfaces of 7204 gateways are connecting to 7609 with different public ip block. I used VRRP for my internal nework and failover have been tested working.
Even tried to remove link of 7204-A and 7609, the failover works perfect. If I shutdown/ remove the link between my 4507R-E and 7204-A (primary gw_higher vrrp priority), vrrp redundancy/failover still works, but pings from internal network to internet is only 50% success....alternate 4 ping reply and 4 time out.
I have to do a migration of sup32 to RSP720 for which I need to know if you can operate the equipment connected with the 2 supervisors at the same time??? and it still working ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a router CISCO 7609-S with two RSP 720 engines,and other cards are 7600-ES+20G3C,7600-ES+40G3C.One day it has a error cord " %XDR-6-XDRIPCNOTIFY: Message not sent to slot 4/0 (4) because of IPC error queue flush. Disabling linecard. (Expected during linecard OIR)" and the card resets.Cisco TAC told us it is a bug which is CSCtj05576.and I want to upgrade the ios from c7600rsp72043-advipservices-mz.122-33.SRD4.bin to c7600 rsp 72043-advipservices-mz.122-33.SRE5.bin.Now I want to know this:1, Is it right to upgrade to this new ios? Is the new ios suitable for the cards?2,I want to know the right way to upgrade ios in two engines.
Atfer I copy the new ios to the master engine and slave engine,and then change the bootvar and save config.Is it auto copy the config to de slave engine?Atfer do this ,I want to know how to apply the new ios,Does it reload the slave engine first and then force-switchover the master engine to slave engine. Or Atfer do this,I reload the router on active engine directly?
In my existing production router 7609 of my company, sup-engine already fixed in slot 5 with SRC2 12.2(33) IOS and I need to insert another sup engine in slot 6 with SRE7 IOS code image and after this, again sup engine in slot 5 must be with SRE7 IOS image...(also I have extra sup engines with SRE 7 code image ready with me) Query:i am going to offload router before proceed for this activity?i will insert new sup engine in slot 6 with SRE 7 ios image and now i need to re-install spare sup engine with SRE 7 code readily available with me by removing existing sup engine from slot 5 (Active) so what will be the proceedure to insert new sup engine with SRE 7 code in slot 5 and slot 6 with minimum downtime of router?
existing setup sup engine in slot 5 with SRC2 12.3 (old hardware) slot 6 is EMPTY
final result should be like this: sup engine in slot 6 with SRE 7 (new hardware)
sup engine in slot 5 with SRE 7 (new hardware)
Yesterday, myself and local support team has been engaged to perform troubleshooting the issue of some web site accessing .Mos of this case is cased by MTU issue, So, I've tried to configure the following configuration on interface tunnel 0.Device: Cisco 7609 with IOS s72033-adventerprisek9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF8.bin
I've tried to figure out what the supporting command after 'ip tcp' in tunnel 0 and following likes..ip tcp ?compression-connections Maximum number of compressed connectionsheader-compression Enable TCP header compression.there is no such command about 'ip tcp adjust-mss.So, my questions is that what is the replace command for 'ip tcp adjust-mss' ? Is this only support on Router? such as Cisco 7200. or not, to take effect same functional on C7609, what is the command for that?
I have a cisco 7609 running IOS version c7600rsp72043-advipservicesk9-mz.122-33.SRE0a.bin with the following modules..
sh mod
Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.
--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ -----------
3 20 7600 ES+ 7600-ES+20G3CXL
[Code]....
The circuit has been tested as clean , so for the moment we have to assume that it is not a circuit issue We also have another idential 7600 in another POP with similar config that does not display the same problem
I have a 7609 with a Flexwan module with a PA-POS-1OC3. Is there a command to determine they type of SFP in the module ? sho controllers POS didn't provide the SFP type.
View 2 Replies View RelatedIm having this error on the 7609, but for other policy its working.
Code...
We have Cisco 7609 Router and one 6 Mbps link which is on ethernet . When we are trerminating on Gigaethernet of 7609 router it is not coming up. While same link is showing up and working fine on other routers which is having Ethernet interface.
View 1 Replies View RelatedHave high cpu utilization on Cisco 7609 router. when i check output "Sh proc cpu sort".
View 2 Replies View RelatedIs the 7600-SIP-400= & SPA-1XOC12-POS still supported in the old models of the Cisco 7609 i.e.;
CISCO7609SUP32-GE-3B7609-S323B-8G-RS7632ISK9-12218SXF
To understand and configuring VPN setup to give secure access to my DB & Application Server exist in my Datacenter, to other Service Provider organisation. They need to access those DB & Application Server sitting at their company LAN itself.
My DC Setup :-
1. Core Router 7609 with SPA-IPSEC-SSC400-1 ( Cisco 6500/7600 IPSec VPN SPA Bundle 1 )
2. Core Switch 6513 with FWSM, ACE, SVC ( Network Analyser ), SUP 720
3. Distribution 6509 SUP 720
All the DB & Application Server connected to Distribution Switch in various VLAN,The Server support team from another company need the access to those, for that we will take MPLS link connecting out Core Router.