About two days ago my latency to games and when I ping sites such as google I would have about 20-30ms more than usual. But my ping is steady and doesnt fluctuate, so say I would normally have 70ms to a game server I would now get 100 or so. I have tried all the standard things such as as resetting my router but to no avail. Also nobody else is on the connection only me. Normally I would ping google and get a 19-21ms response time and now im getting about 36-38 screenshot below.
I am facing high cpu util issue 80% in pix 515E with IOS 7.2(4).When a syslog is enable for informational/warnings level traps the util goes to 80% where as other wise it is observed to be 36-37%.When i changed the trap level to alert the util seems to be normal, only the issue is when warning and info traps are configured, prior to the issue the same settings were working absolutely fine ,suddendly the util issue has occured.
I want to upgrade LMS 3.2 to 4.1. But when I look to "Special Notes and Exceptions for Devices Supported" document ,It seems that 2811 have 2 SysID.
Why there are two IDs for the same hardware and under which ID will my 2811 routers be classified into inventory database. This information is important since customer want to have support of 2811 in CiscoView of LMS 4.1 (around 200 devices).
I am looking to upgrade a 2811 router to 15.1.2T and see in the release notes that this image is only compatible with the "C Series" older ISR routers? What is a "C Series" ISR and how do I know if I have one?
I recently upgraded my 2811 router with an AC- IP power supply, and installed a HWIC-4ESW-POE, with an Inline Power Daughter Card (ILPM-4) installed on the HWIC.
The second I turned the router's power on, there was a spark and a burning smell. Everything still works, except POE. Examining the card, I see it caused a circuit on the ILPM-4 motherboard to blow, and there is black residue everywhere. This is a Genuine Cisco power supply, but why it's done this.
Furthermore, when the power supply was first installed, it had so much electricity (and I know this is why the card got toasted) that touching the end of the console cable or an Ethernet cable connected to the router, or even the router chassis, would cause you to get a small electric shock, like touching a mild electric fence. Clearly, the power supply I installed is "too-powerful", but it is a 2811-AC-IP and nothing should have caused this.
I upgraded a 2811 router to the latest version and apparently everything went smooth. I reloaded and did a sh ver the IOS show the correct version, but the boot strap shows the old IOS. How can I change the boot strap to show the new IOS.
I am having a Cisco 4507 switch. The CPU on the switch is running between 50% to 60% constantly. To troubleshoot I collected some logs using debugs & show commands.
debug platform packet all receive buffer show platform cpu packet buffered debug platform packet all count show platform cpu packet statistics show processes cpu sorted | exc 0.00 show platform health show platform cpu packet statistics
show platform health output shows the below process crossing the target value.
%CPU %CPU RunTimeMax Priority Average %CPU Total Target Actual Target Actual Fg Bg 5Sec Min Hour CPU Stub-JobEventSchedul 10.00 13.41 10 47 100 500 13 13 10 5462:52 K2PortMan Review 3.00 5.35 15 11 100 500 4 4 3 1799:47
What I need to know is, though these process are running in Low Priority, will there be any issue if the CPU goes high due to these process.
I have just finished installing LMS 4.2 on a new VM (Windows 2008 R2 Standard Edition SP1). I have already reloaded the server, all LMS services have correctly started. However, the process CS_sm_server.exe still using 100% CPU.Windows 2008 R2 Standard Edition SP1
We are running Cisco 6509-e and we are running load test and when traffic reach 80 mbps switch start reponding very slow. I checked CPU usage and it was using 100% and connection to the switch from outside to inside are 80K. once connection dropp Cisco release CUP and it start responding normal. [code]
We have two offices connected using Site-to-Site VPN (IPSEC) as shown:(IP ficticius)Office 1 - We had to use 2 routers since we have a range of valid IPs: From a host in office 2 we normally ping 192.168.102.1 (gateway at office 1),But when pinging a host inside office 1 (eg: 192.168.102.8) 50% of packets have been lost.Could it be a hardware problem?
I am working at a client site that is an MPLS customer. The customer has an MPLS circuit that runs between their Main HQ and their Disaster Recovery site. I have been asked to analyze and report as well on the way the Qos Policy is written, and to provide any recommendations on how they can improve performance.There is a statement within the Qos Policy as it exists at each end on the 3825 routers. The statement is called "shape average percent". Here is the policy from one side:
policy-map QoS class COS2_traffic set dscp af31 shape average percent 12 bandwidth percent 13
What does this statement mean and how is it different than the the "bandwidth percent" statement?
I have two switches that always are with yours CPU in 39 or 40 %. the switches are:
IOS (tm) C3500XL Software (C3500XL-C3H2S-M), Version 12.0(5)WC3b, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
I think it's very strange the CPU always in 39 or 40 %. neither all ports of the switches are busy there are 6 ports free in each switch. 40 % I think it is a high value for CPU maybe because my IOS version 12.0 ?
I have an ASA 5520 with a CSC-SSM modul,the problem is when i am logging in to my ASDM, on the content security monitoring, it's showing the CPU and memory are at 100%(CSC) but when i directly connect csc-ssm MODULE it comes down,so is it problem with ASDM , java OR csc.
Whenever i try to download an exe file from the internet, its just get stuck at 99%. It doesn't happen with .rar or any other file. Not to mention, I was able to download net fremwork 4.0 exe installer though. I tried these things: Used different browsers. Used different download managers. Disabled firewall and AV.
I have ATT DSL and pretty much every night, I lose a large portion of the Internet. I cannot ping these sites, while the rest of the net works fine. The other night, I could not ping major domains like ATT, CNN, MSNBC, BBC (a chronic missing domain). On the other hand, I could get Yahoo fine and go to a streaming audio site and run music perfectly...but about 90% of the Internet was unreachable. Could not load their sites nor ping them in command line. The other 10% worked flawlessly.
I installed a CSC-SSM-20 module on ASA 5510. After policy services have been enabled, services works well for a few minutes, after that the cpu usage's module rise to 100% and all http traffic is wholy blocked, till the cpu usage go down.This happens very frequently and traffic stay blocked for such a long time that it makes the csc-ssm module unusable. It's disabled right now. ASA version is 8.2(1)and CSC-Module version is 6.6.1172.0.
We have a client that has a large number of AIR-AP1252AG-N-K9 installed in the network with power injectors. We have seen a about 48% failure rate of AP's failing with all 3 red lights on the unit. Once I get the AP in the lab I'm unable to get any response from the console, therefore unable to troubleshoot.
Trying to update my firmware 1.00.01 B15 to 1.00.01 B17. I downloaded the firmware to my desktop (using mac os X 10.5.5) and connected my computer directly to port 1 on the back of the router. I used the Firmware upgrade tool under the Administration tab to upload the new firmware file. The update progress starts but fails at 98%
I have one Catalyst 4503 with Supervisor 7L-E 10 with IOS - XE 03.02.00.XO. . One of its gigabit interfaces is connected to a Internet link of 1 Mega. In terms of QoS i would like to limit the total bandwidht of this gigabit interface to just one 1 Mega and simultaneous i want share bandwidth between traffic classes with bandwith percent up to 1 Mega and not 1Giga.
I have two Windows 7 computers and neither one will successfully upgrade a 1242 AP to LWAP. However, I go to a coworker's XP machine and run the tool without issues. On Windows 7 I keep receiving the error message of ACL or Firewall is blocking. I have added rules and then even tried disabling the firewalls completely on both computers and still no success.
Is it possible to upgrade the CSACS-1121-UP-K9 to be a non upgrade part? We were going to upgrade from a Windows 4.x to the above Appliance (version 5.x) but there is now a reason to keep the old Windows version running therefore we cannot give the new Appliance the old ACS's licenses?!So we should have (with hindsight) bought a fresh version of the ACS 5.x rather than an upgrade.
My setup is ISP-2811-PIX 515E-LAN. Right now, I am doing a PAT for IPSEC tunnels to terminate on the PIX. Do you recommend I use the 2811 instead of PIX for VPN or keep things the way it is? Trying to determine the best box to use.
i have a branch router that connects to mpls WAN. Also has a second interface that is used for dmvpn failover in case WAN goes down.We want to use this second interface also as the primary internet circuit for the branch. I changed the default route to the next hop address on the other side of the second interface and expected this to work.But i was told i need to set up NAT for this to work, and set up an ACL for NAT to use. how to set up NAT?