Cisco WAN :: Cat6500 - Policy Route To Equipment

Jul 31, 2011

I have to do a policy route on my cat6500. basically, I want to redirect all traffic from 10.1.1.100 to internet address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx to another machine 10.1.1.101. however, the 10.1.1.100 and 10.1.1.101 are in save subnet. not directed to cat6500, but both connecte to same switch which is linked to cat6500. However the 10.1.1.101 is not a cisco router. but some sort of equipment which change traffic and pass them to another subnet.

that means can I do below:
 
access-list 101 permit ip host 10.1.1.100 host xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
route-map reroute permit 10
march ip address 101

[Code].....

View 1 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Routers :: SRP527W U - Policy Route

Nov 26, 2012

I have a pair of SRP527W-U units, which each connect to a separate ISP by ADSL2+ . I am attempting to use each simultaneously as follows:
 
ISP-A via Cisco A for general traffic, and to run HTTP server X
ISP-B via Cisco B to run HTTP server Y
 
HTTP servers X and Y are on one machine, but binding to two separate IP addresses eg x.x.x.3 and x.x.x.4 . In a situation like this, I would normally configure Cisco A and Cisco B with x.x.x.1 and x.x.x.2 respectively. CiscoA would run DMZ to x.x.x.3 and Cisco B DMZ to x.x.x.4. The server would use x.x.x.1 as the default route. Then I would set Cisco A to have a policy route catching source address x.x.x.4 and sending it to next-hop/gateway x.x.x.2.
 
BUT, the policy route feature requires traffic be sent out the WAN port or a tunnel (no next hop, only WAN side VLANs, tunnels or interfaces). configuring a GRE tunnel connecting the two routers is fruitless, and the tunnels refuse to be created on the LAN side (tunneling is only possible out the WAN).
 
Attempting to simultaneously use the 4th LAN/WAN port in WAN mode also fails, as the WAN port is only available when the ADSL port is not. Under Win2000 and Linux it was possible to configure two separate network cards and use seperate sub nets, each with a default route. This feature no longer works with more recent versions of Windows.
 
How I might get this working, without buying a 887? I am open to buying a 547.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Ip Policy Route-map On 3750g?

Nov 18, 2008

I have a 3750g on which I am trying to configure the ip policy route-map command on each of the vlan interfaces.  However after entering the command it does not appear.  I'm not sure what to do at this point.  I have changed the SDM template to routing and I am running the IPServices image. 

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Ip Policy Route-map On 3750

Jun 10, 2010

I try to enter the command "ip policy route-map"  on 3750's interface. But the command doesn't appear. Why? Whereas I see several times that this command is possible on this switch. What I have to do to enter this command?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 3725 - Route-Map For Policy Based Routing

Feb 2, 2011

I have been using a route map to pick WAN exit points (PBR) on a 3725 router.  This have been working fine with /24 networks.  I am trying to pick the first /28 piece out of the 10.1.1.0 network and send it out a different exit from the rest of that network.  I have tried the /28 entry at the start and end of the route map, although I thought the first match would stop any further route map processing.  The entry does not seem to have any effect, as traffic from all addresses in the 10.1.1.0 /24 network exit per the "route-map 10-LAN permit 11" section.
 
access-list 5 remark Ten Dot 1 low 63 IPs
access-list 5 remark SDM_ACL Category=2access-list 5 remark Ten Dot One Low 63 IPs access-list 5 permit 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.63 log
[ code]....

View 11 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: WS-c3750G -24T / Unable To Look Ip Policy Route-map In PBR?

Apr 22, 2012

i have a Layer3 Switch Cisco WS-c3750G -24T , initially i have a IOS version c3750-Ipbase , recentely i have upgraded my IOS to c3750-Ipservices-M to enable to PBR for my network , i have created all the acl and tried to give the route-map with PBR , the command was initiallying but i am not able to see the applied route-map in my policy route , i have gone through the blog and enabled SDM prefer routing , but no luck .

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Configure Policy Based Route On 2811 Router?

Jan 19, 2013

configuring policy based route for my cisco router?Basically, I have a 2811 cisco router with 2 ADSL ports. 1 port is for iiNet line and another port is for Telstra line.I want to configure a policy based route on the router so that:Any traffic coming from 1 internal IP (i.e. 172.16.x.1) will go through iinet line (i.e. Dialer 0) interface.Any traffic from rest of the office will go through the Telstra line (i.e. Dialer 1) interface. Is there any easy way to configure this policy based route?

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Cannot Apply Policy Route-map To VLAN Interface 3560G

May 1, 2013

I have a 3560G that I cannot apply a policy route-map to one of the VLAN interfaces. I am running up to date software, c3560-ipservicesk9-mz.150-2.SE2 and it accepts the command, but does not show it in the sh run of the interface. I updated to this code as I had seen previously someone said it needed to be version 15 before you could apply route-maps to VLAN interfaces.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Policy Route-map Not Sticking To 3750 Interfaces?

Apr 23, 2013

I have a client with a 3750x stack.  We've upgraded it to IP Services.  We have a simple PBR setup.  One access-list to forward traffic from a specific LAN ip to another gateway on the network. 
 
I go to vlan1 (default vlan) to apply the PBR and the command takes with no errors, but do a "show run" and it doesn't show up under the interface.
 
I go to vlan1 and apply a PBR that doesn't exist and the command takes with no errors, and is listed under the interface in the config
 
I can apply the PBR globally and appears to work, but we can't have it there based on other issues it creates.
 
config:  (all tracks are up)
C3750_stack#show sdm prefer
The current template is "desktop routing" template.

[Code]....

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: PBR - 3750 VLan Does Not Accept IP Policy Route-map

Nov 1, 2012

I am trying to configure policy based routing however when i try to apply to an interface vlan.  The configuration does not show in the interface.
  
route-map OTHER_ROUTE permit 10
match ip address OTHER_ROUTE
set ip next-hop x.x.x.x

[Code]....

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Unable To Apply IP Policy Route-Map To VLan 4 In C-3750

Apr 22, 2012

Here is my configuration below , i have upgraded my C-3750 switch IOS from IPbase to IPservices , after upgrading i have tried to apply PBR on my Vlan 4 and failed , when i am tying to apply route-map to Vlan4 the command was taking but i am unable to see the route-map when sh run , i am giving the command as "ip policy route-map TTSL" in my Vlan4 , below is the configuration.
 
In Vlan2 i have connected one ISP and Vlan4 I have connected one ISP , my local subnets are 192.168.1.x and 192.168.2.x , now i want to route the 192.168.1.x traffic from Vlan2 and 192.168.2.x Traffic from Vlan4 .
  
sh boot
coreswitch#sh boot
BOOT path-list      : flash:c3750-ipservices-mz.122-35.SE5/c3750-ipservices-mz.122-35.SE5.bin

[Code].....

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco AAA/Identity/Nac :: ASR9K Integrated With ACS 3.3 Equipment

Jun 2, 2013

I am currently deploying Cisco ASR9K BNG solution and it needs to be integrated with a Cisco ACS 3.3 (yes that old .. going to migrate to new product in the future) equipment. There are several specific attributes need that are not on the base config of the ACS 3.3 but it seems that i can configure them manually:In addition to supporting a set of predefined RADIUS vendors and vendor-specific attributes (VSAs), Cisco Secure ACS supports RADIUS vendors and VSAs that you define. Vendors you add must be IETF-compliant; therefore, all VSAs that you add must be sub-attributes of IETF RADIUS attribute number 26..This is from the ACS 3.3 configuration manual.I have never done this user defined VSAs.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 1841 And WIC-1T For Data Transmission With RS-422 Equipment

Dec 22, 2010

I would like to connect my 1841 to the equipment that has RS-422 interface in order to transmit data. I have to buy one WIC-1T to support it. However, I am not sure that this module will be able to support RS-422 or not (As I can see there is DB25 which is the interface of RS-422, but I realize that RS-232 also has 25 pins.)

View 3 Replies View Related

How To Get WLAN Computers To Communicate With Equipment On LAN

Dec 19, 2012

On a small office setup we have many computers connected to one another using wireless LAN. One of the PCs on the WLAN also has a LAN connection with a few other equipment connected to it. The WLAN IP Addresses are 192. 168. 1.XXX and the LAN addresses are 192.168.0.XXX. How can I get to communicate the WLAN computers with the equipment on LAN.

View 7 Replies View Related

3750 Scored Free Equipment

May 19, 2011

what it looks like after it was cleaned up and my switches added in:That is a 3750, 48 port switch that it came with. I added in my 3750's and a 3550. The PC is for GNS3 and will have additional ports added for router interfaces soon.

I have a terminal server in the mail to round it out.

View 17 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: QoS (dscp-to-exp Mutation) On Sup-2T / Cat6500?

Nov 28, 2012

I ran into interesting issue on Sup-2T. As you probably know, QoS CLI is changed on this new supervisor. I'm looking to translate incoming dscp-marked packets, into exp-marked on egress.Now, according to documentation - Catalyst 6500 Release 15.0SY Software Configuration Guide - this functionality is still called mutation-map and is configured under 'platform qos map exp-mutation'. The problem is quite simple – there is no 'platform qos map exp-mutation' on 2 different machines I checked upon. Here:
  
Some-6513(config)#platform qos ?  10g-only           qos pure 10G mode  aggregate-policer  Named aggregate policer  marking            marking keyword
police             police keyword  protocol           protocol keyword  queueing-only      queueing-only (no QoS rewrite,  no policing)  rewrite            packet qos rewrite enable/disable                    statistics-export  qos statistics data export

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Monitor Some UPS Equipment For 2960

Feb 20, 2013

i am trying to monitor some UPS equipment,for that i am using a cisco 2960 switch and when the UPS is down it sends a L1 loop.when the switch detects the loop the int in which the UPS is conected to will get a link and go up.now my problem is this, as you probeblly know the switch has a protocol which protects it from getting loops and cuasing all kinds of problems.i need to remove this protocol and allow the switch to get L1 loops? 
 
P.si have tryed to use UDLD, KEEPALIVE, BPDU guard, down-when-looped and errdisable commands with no success?

View 2 Replies View Related

Equipment Necessary For A 400 Foot Range Outdoor G Network?

Dec 8, 2011

I want to set up a wireless video security system around my farm. I have been having a lot of predator problems this year and I am tired of getting up in the middle of the night and running outside in my underwear to check on my livestock (especially now that it is winter) because my wife thought she heard something attacking the animals. I have been looking around at wireless wifi security cameras to use with my home wifi network and all of them ( like the Foscam FI8918W) use IEEE 802.11g standards. I have done a lot of research on this and there is just no consistent data about to do this. I know that are a lot of smart people here because I have posted here before and got some great answers. So, I am just going to tell you what I would like to achieve and you can tell me how (if possible) I can do it. I am willing to buy all new equipment if necessary. I need a omni-directional wifi G network with a minimum range of 400 feet. I have several buildings to cover so it has to be omni-directional. My house is located 350 feet from the furthest building, so I figure a 400 foot range should give me good consistent results. I already have an old Linksys WRT54GS router with Firmware Version: v1.52.8. It is located in my bedroom against an outside wall and even now I get some signal from it out at my farthest building (350 feet) and even browse the web with my laptop. But the signal is spotty and seems to come and go for no reason. What is really funny is that I have less signal in the second bathroom on the other side of the house, but I guess that is because of all the walls in between.

Now I have read that you can increase a routers broadcast strength by modifying the router settings. But you need special firmware like, Tomato, to do that and I have already tried to install , Tomato, to my router with no success. So if modifying the router software is necessary, I will need another router I guess.

1. A good strong router capable of IEEE 802.11g.

2. A good strong outdoor antenna that will connect to the router.

My problem is that I can find good routers and good antennas, but nothing that say they will work with each other. And another thing is that it appears to me from what I have read so far, that the stronger the antenna is, the more narrow the vertical broadcast field is. So, if I understand this right, with a strong antenna, the antenna and the receiving device have to be about the same height horizontally speaking. So if I put the antenna on the top of my house, it will basically shoot right over all my cameras. But if I put the antenna lower along an outside wall, then the cameras on the opposite side of the house won't receive signal. But again, this is just my understanding of what I read so far. You can see now why I am so confused about this. The more I read, the more I get confused. It seem like this should be simple, like, "Buy this router, Buy that antenna". Surly, I am not the first person who wants to extend their home network to a reasonable outdoor range. It's not like I want it to reach miles (that would be nice except for all the hackers trying hack my network).

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Using Cat6500 For A Small Hosting Company

Jan 9, 2012

I am running a smaller hosting company and i am currently looking at a Cat6506 switch with a SUP720 Supervisor Engine. I have also been looking at a Cat6509 with a SUP2-GE Supervisor Engine. At the moment i am getting my connection from a ISP but i am going to get my own BGP AS now.. My question is just, how much will the SUP720 be able to route, and how many routes will i need to get it to route my packets in and out of my AS? I have seen that the full BGP table is over 400,000 and the SUP720 is only capable of 256,000, but do i really need the full table? I
 
major differences between the SUP720 and SUP2-GE Supervisor Engines?

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Use IP SLA To Monitor Remote Routes On CAT6500?

May 6, 2012

I need to use IP SLA to monitor remote routes on CAT6500

CAT6500 is running "sup-bootflash:s72033-jk9o3sv-mz.122-18.SXD7b.bin" on SUP720
Feature Navigator said it is
ENT FW W/MPLS/IPV6/SSH/3DES After drill down into feature set I found that this version support for IP SLA such IP SLAs - ICMP Path Echo Operation

BUT, back to console I can not do such (config) ip sla command (not found cmd CAT6500(config)# ip sla 1) What I did wrong or others cmd imply this ip sla process?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Wireless :: CAT6500 - How To Log Into WISM From Switch

Apr 9, 2012

we have two wisms in a cat6500, I wonder how can you log into the wism from the switch. to be more specifically, how can I know the processor number?

View 4 Replies View Related

Home Network :: Putting Equipment In Server Cabinet

Apr 26, 2011

I just got a server cabinet from a friend and i am going to put all my networking stuff in there i want to put my router inside it too but im not sure if it will affect the signal the cabinet is made out of metal but not thick.

View 2 Replies View Related

Ethernet RJ45 Port - Two Different Internet Connection To One Equipment?

Nov 16, 2012

I have an telemetry equipment which have one ethernet RJ45 port, so I have an internet connection and I can connect to this device remotely using a browser on my PC for security reason I want to feed this device with a second internet connection that is coming from a cellular line , can I just put the two different Internet cables into a switch and from that switch connect my device?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Application Networking :: CAT6500 SYSLOG Loadbalancing Using ACE

Mar 17, 2012

I want to use the ACE blade in CAT6500 to loadbalancing SYSLOG events towards (SIEM) collectors. Servers and network devices will sent there syslog messages to different collectors after being loadbalanced by ACE. I was just wondering, since a lot of clients are going to sent there complete syslog events to the VIP and thus introducing a high connection rate. (+/- 200.000 CPS) According to the specs, the ACE blade has a limitation of 325.000 connection per second. I suppose this is a limitation at device level. (not on a per context basis, and does that include both TCP and UDP packets?) Could the UDP BOOST feature might come in handy allowing very high rate UDP syslog packet loadbalancing?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: How To Clear Vty Line On Cat6500

Jun 19, 2012

how to clear vty line?  Please see below. A sh tcp <line number> shows that the TCB is waiting for TCP Process.  The TCP processs TCB is waiting for is SSH.  I believe because of this ssh process still running, the vty line cannot be cleared. 
 
sh users
   Line       User       Host(s)             Idle       Location
   1 vty 0     pf         10.10.20.8                                   9w1d 10.10.1.54
   2 vty 1     pf         10.10.1.16                                35w0d 10.10.1.54
   3 vty 2     pf         10.10.1.16                                 1y14w 10.10.1.54

[code].....

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Meaning Of Crash Log Cat6500

Jan 1, 2012

What this crash means?  This is a 6509 with a single Sup720 Cisco IOS Software, s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9_WAN-M), Version 12.2(33)SXI, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)System returned to ROM by s/w reset at 04:42:07 PST8PDT Mon Jan 2 2012 (SP by bus error at PC 0x40C6681C, address 0x424B).

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Cat6500 To Add Vlan Group For Fwsm

May 22, 2012

i have fwsm in cat6500, i have one firewall vlan group which is in firewall module 1 vlan group 10. I need tocreate another vlan  group and add to firewall module 1 vlan group 10, 20. i need to have zero downtime.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Upgrading IOS On Cat6500 Using ISSU

Jun 4, 2012

I am planning to upgrade my cat6500 using ISSU but can not find my doc to follow yet.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Does ASA Services Module 9.x Is Compatible With CAT6500

Jan 3, 2013

I am trying to figure out if the new code for ASA SM 9.0(x) or 9.1 is compatible with CAT6500 but I could not find any document that explicity confirms the the INCOMPATIBILITY. This table from the Release notes is not quite clear.
 
[URL]

It says that code 8.5 is compatible with Cat6500 and version 9.X is compatible with R7600.So are the two different trains now, one for Cat6500 and one for R7600?
 
My real goal is to find the correct software versions (not interim) that provides compatilibity with Catalyst 6500 with Supervisor 2T  and ASASM.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Cat6500 SUP-2T Service Module

Apr 12, 2012

Using the new SUP-2T, need to clarify one query. If we are using the new SUP-2T in VSS mode, will the new ASA service module and NAM-3 are supported?  From Cisco site, ASA module FAQ:
 
Q. Will the ASA Services Module support the Cisco Catalyst Virtual Switching System (VSS) at FCS?

A. Yes, depending on which supervisor you use. The ASA Services Module supports VSS either as a single firewall or as a failover pair of firewalls, when used with the Supervisor 720-10G (VS-S720-10G-3C and VS-S720-10G-3CXL). Transparent and multi- context modes also work with the VSS in this configuration. However, though the SUP 720-3B (WS-SUP720-3B and WS-SUP720-3BXL) is supported by the ASA Services Module, it is not capable of supporting the VSS. No reference to Supervisor-2T.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: MAC Without Port Number Cat6500

Oct 30, 2012

We have IP device on the farm switch(cat6500, which is an access layer siwtch), with the gateway on the core switches (Nexus7000), on the core when I do show ip arp, I found the mac.But when I do sh mac add add of that mac there is no port attached to that mac.
 
Since that particular vlan only resides on the cat 6500 and two cores, so I logged in to the 6500, and when I show mac- in that vlan, I didn’t find that mac addresss. Instead, I found another mac address with last 8bit are the same of that mac.
 
Is it some kind VIP of the mac? How so, if no port, how can the switch forward the frame? [code]

View 1 Replies View Related

Connecting Cisco 1751 Equipment To Actiontec M1424wr Verizon Router?

Jun 28, 2012

I have a Cisco 1751 that I wanted to use to create another network behind my Actiontec m1424wr Verizon router. My plan was to connect a linksys wrt54gs to the Cisco router for device connectivity. And I wanted everyone else in the house to still be able to use the Verizon router as expected. I know this is probably not the best way to create an internal network. But I am studying for the CCNA & CEH and just wanted to use the Outdated Cisco IOS on the 1751.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 - Choice Of Equipment For Multi-tenancy?

Mar 9, 2013

A client I have just taken on wishes to provide internet data and VoIP for multiple tenants in their new office they move to in a few weeks.
 
they currently have a Cisco 2811 router with a 24 port Catalyst 2960 PoE managed switch serving just their staff and one tenant company who is plugged into a single port on the switch. I dont know what the tenant has the other side of that at this time.
 
when they move they currently will provide single port access points on the switch for each tenant, so the tenant can deal with their own network LAN. The client will provide phones to all the tenants using VoIP phones on a single subnet and hosted on an external PBX the phones all plug into the Catalyst and use the PoE. the WAN is a 20mbps fibre connection.
 
The client has 16 staff, the tenants are 3 companies with 3,6 and 9 staff. They may all increase or decrease in size to a total size of about 30 or 40 people.
 
I have a few questions
 
1. should I look at Vlan setup for this instead of the current basic routing setup or is that overkill since they only use one port access point per tenant as gateway.

2. can the cisco 2811 handle this or is it a bit old.

3. what router replacement would be recommended for this task given the above info especially if I went with Vlan solution.

4. any thoughts on the current switch's capability for this task.

5. managing bandwidth solutions? is there any router designed with this in mind. the ASA maybe or something like it with nice visual webgui management capabilities for monitoring and controlling bandwidth use of tenants?
Mark

View 2 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved