I would like to know whether I will be able to setup a VPN tunnel between a wireless router and wireless client on the same network. What I plan to do is to first setup up my router to use DD-Wrt as its OS. I have read some tutorials on the Internet, about how one can configure a VPN server when using this router OS.Now if I assume that I have a client on the same WLAN network who is already connected and so on; - can the client connect to the router's VPN server and then connect to the Internet using the VPN tunnel that has been established? The purpose of this configuration is to see whether if this setup (if it can actually be configured that way) would protect against wireless man in the middle attacks that use trivial tools such as Cain and Abel.
I can connect to the router over VPN just fine, problem is that once I connect I can not access the 192.168.1.0 network... can't ping a workstation on the network 192.168.1.25, I can however Ping the Router which is 192.168.1.254.
FastEthernet 4 is my WAN
used this for setup: [URL]
Here is the config:
! Last configuration change at 13:50:29 UTC Tue Mar 16 1993 by cjcatucci!version 15.0no service padservice timestamps debug datetime msecservice timestamps log datetime msecservice password-encryption!hostname c861w!boot-start-markerboot-end-marker!no logging monitorenable secret
I recently purchased a Cisco 2911 to replace my Cisco 1711 router. I copied the configuration from the Cisco 1711 router to the Cisco 2911 router. Everything seemed to work correctly except when I VPN tunnel into the Cisco 2911 router using Cisco's VPN client version 5.0. I can ping the router LAN interface from my PC that is VPNed into the router but I can no longer ping or access the devices on the LAN side of the router as I did on the Cisco 1711 router. I don’t see errors in the log or hits blocking anything in the acls. It’s using the same configuration that I had on the Cisco 1711 router, and this did work on the Cisco 1711. The Cisco 2911 router is running IOS Software, C2900 Software (C2900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.0(1)M1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1).
Here is the VPN clinet portion of the configuration: The LAN is addressed as 192.168.0.0/24. The router LAN interface is 192.168.0.1, which I can ping and access. I can't ping or access anything on the LAN (192.168.0.0/24) beside the router.
aaa authentication login vpnclientauth local aaa authorization network vpngroupauth local ! crypto isakmp client configuration group remote-clients key 6 xxxx pool clients [Code]....
i've configured Cisco VPN CLient on a router 2821, and it is working fine.I could access inside resourses normally>the problem is that when i connect with VPN i lost connectivity to internet? What is wrong with my configuration? Below the running config of the router.
CISCO2821#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 5834 bytes ! version 12.4
I have implemented a Clientless SSL VPN solution with Smart-Tunnel feature on Cisco ASA 5520, software 8.4(4)1.I have been successful in making Bookmarks which employ Smart-Tunnel feature to avoid content rewritting (if any). And in reality it works fine with some links. However there are some links to an Oracle portal, it doesn't work.I was able to log into the Oracle portal with its username/password. However when i click into a button of the drop-down menu, nothing happens while normally there should be a box appearing. The Oracle portal runs with some Java stuffs which i don't really know as i am not a programming engineer anyway.
I have remote branches that connect to the corporate office as a site-to-site VPN. Now the clients at the branch are getting an application that is using an unsecured port (tcp/23). I would like to use a set of ASA 5520's that I have at the corporate office, with the AnyConnect license on them. I want the client machines to establish a tunnel from the client to one of these ASA's. The ASA' then would have a connection to the VLAN that the receiving server is housed on. The trick is to just establish the tunnel from the client to the ASA that will allow the IP of the client to not be translated. So I would use the ASA as a security 'pass-through' for the clients that use this new application.
I've been labbing on my asa5505 at home, setting up different VPN solutions for testing purposes. However, I can't get my anyconnect client to establish a DTLS tunnel when connecting (anyconnect only shows tls, and does not display any errors about not connecting with dtls)I have set dtls port to 444 and this port is open on the other side.
we use the Cisco VPN-Client to connect to our CISCO1921 Router and want to go out again on the same interface to the internet. We configured the connection with the IOS scurity package, have no split tunneling - so the client is forced with it's default gateway to our router - we also have pushed our local dns-server to the client and he gets dns results. Now I think we have to got out with some kind of NAT, because our client has a private IP from the IPSec Client pool. At the moment we have no NAT inside/outside, bacause we only use official IP addres in- and ouside (data-room usage).
- Is it possible to get the NAT function going in and out on the same interface with crypto_map IPSec user comming in and going out to the internet ? - Is it more secure to configure this with vrf ? - Has some a link to example configurations for this ?
i`ve setup smart tunnel with different applications. (mstsc.exe, putty.exe). This works fine. I`ve now tried to add the vSphere client appliaction (VpxClient.exe). But i don`t get it working.
I have a customer I've built a webvpn tunnel for.Users on this tunnel need to have http access to a server at 10.1.1.12 and nothing else.That's fine, but in order for name resolution to work properly they need to be able to send DNS requests to 10.1.1.9.I'm working with two different access lists, my non access list (nat 0) and my split tunnel access list. I can't specify ports in the nat 0 access list, but I did try writing my split tunnel access list as follows:
When I do that users can access the 10.1.1.9 dns server, but they can hit it on anything (ping, 3389, etc.).I'm trying to figure out how I can limit them so they will only be able to pull dns but nothing else.They have the Any connect Essentials license, so unfortunately a clientless VPN is not an option. Is there some other access list I can interpose that will limit things the way I want?
I am using a RV110W as a VPN client to establish a VPN conection since some months. So far everything works fine. But all traffic is routet thru the VPN tunnel. Now I try only to route specific adresses thru the tunnel but not the internet acess.
RV110W is in Gateway mode WAN interface is connected with internet I am using PPTP with PAP and MPPE for VPN so far no static routes (I could not set e.g. a route to 0.0.0.0 because web-interface says its not a valid adress)
Goal is to route only traffic for the target network thru tunnel and the rest direct via WAN interface.
Is it possible with ASAVPNSERVER 5520 and an EasyVPN 5505 Client to have the client do split tunnel to a single public IP address? Both devices are on 8.2(5) 33. Could you possible provide sample config for split tunnel?
how to setup a both ends of an IPSEC VPN tunnel using a software client such as shrewsoft vpn and an 800 series router?
I've tried following the instructions on cisco's site, but I don't really understand which interface I should use? Dialer, VLAN1 or UnNumbered to a Loopback?
I'm OK with most basic features of the router, but never had any luck with VPNs?
The ASA has one public IP on its outside interface and using PAT to the internet. It only has two interfaces, inside and outside using vlan. I created a IPSec VPN through CLI. My goal is for the remote client to browse the Internet throught tunnel.
Q1: Is it possible?
Q2: The remote side gets connected and has IP from the pool, with is part of inside network. But it cannot ping anything, including the gateway, which is the inside interface. I debug it, it shows the ASA receives the ping packages, but it doesnt send anything back to the client.
I have configured a lab for RA VPNs with a ASA5510 software version 8.2 and VPN Client 5 using digital certificates with Microsoft CA on a Windows 2003 server. I did the configuration based on this document from Cisco website: URL
Now the vpn works just fine, but now I need to configure different tunnel-groups so I can provide different services to different users. The problem I have now is that I don't know how to configure it so the certificate matches the tunnel-group name. If i do a debug crypto isakmp on ASA I get this error messages:
%ASA-7-713906: IP = 165.98.139.12, Trying to find group via OU...%ASA-3-713020: IP = 165.98.139.12, No Group found by matching OU(s) from ID payload: Unknown%ASA-7-713906: IP = 165.98.139.12, Trying to find group via IKE ID...%ASA-3-713020: IP = 165.98.139.12, No Group found by matching OU(s) from ID payload: Unknown%ASA-7-713906: IP = 165.98.139.12, Trying to find group via IP ADDR...%ASA-7-713906: IP = 165.98.139.12, Trying to find group via default group...%ASA-7-713906: IP = 165.98.139.12, Connection landed on tunnel_group DefaultRAGroup
So basically when using certificates I always connect the RA VPN only with the default group DefaultRAGroup. Do I need to use a different web enrollment template for certificate request instead of the user template??? How can I define the OU on the User certificate so it matches the tunnel-group???
How can I configure an ASA 5505 NEM client to allow access to the Internet when the tunnel to the headend is down? I am planning on deploying back to back ASA 5505s in network extension mode but I do not want to block Internet access on the client side if the tunnel to the server should go down.
we have a cisco ASA 5505 and are trying to get the following working:
vpn client (ip 192.168.75.5) - connected to Cisco ASA 5505
the client gets a specific route for an internet address (79.143.218.35 255.255.255.255 192.168.75.1 192.168.75.5 100) when i try to access the url from the client i get a syn sent with netstat when i try the packet tracer from the ASA i see the following:
I'm in process of purchasing a new Cisco routers for our branches that will be used primary to enable IPSec virtual tunnel interfce with "tunnel mode ipsec ipv4". does the default IOS IP Base supports this feature? or i need to purchase DATA license or SECURITY license?
Can I configure a PIX (515), as PPTP client to establish a tunnel with non-Cisco PPTP server ? Can my PIX initiate this type of connection ?Today, I use a PC with PPTP client to establish this and I want replace this with a PIX and I don´t want depends of a PC.
i have a client who needs to establish a VPN tunnel from his satellite office (Site A) to his corporate office (Site Z). His satellite office will have a single PC sitting behind the ASA. In addition, he needs to be able to VPN from his home (Site H) to Site A to access his PC.The first question I have is about the ASA 5505 and the various licensing options. I want to ensure that an ASA5505-BUN-K9 will be able to establish the site-to-site tunnel as well as allow him to use either the IPsec or SSL VPN client to connect from Site H to Site A. Secondly, I would like to verify that no special routing or configuration would need to take place in order to allow traffic not destined for Site Z (i.e., general web browsing or other traffic to any resource that is not part of the Site Z network) to go out his outside interface without specifically traversing the VPN tunnel (split tunneling?)Finally, if the client were to establish a VPN session from Site H to Site A, would that allow for him to connect directly into resources at Site Z without any special firewall security rules? Since the VPN session would come in on the outside interface, and the tunnel back to Site Z goes out on the same interface, would this constitute a split horizon scenario that would call for a more complex config, or will the ASA handle that automatically without issue?
How can I set up a Cisco 831 router (branch location) so that it will accept inbound VPN Client connections and initiate a site-to-site IPSec tunnel to our hub location that uses a VPN 3005 Concentrator? I could get the tunnel to work by configuring it in a dynamic crypto map but interesting traffic on the Cisco 831 side would not bring the tunnel up.
I'm having trouble maintaining a 6rd connection with E4200v2 and the 6rd tunnel. When the 6rd is first setup, IPv6 works perfectly on all my devices. But that only lasts for a few hours. My windows xp computers and iphone cannot get an IPv6 connection/address after a few hours. And then hours turn to days with no IPv6 connection. The router says it's got an IPv6 address but I'm not able to connect any devices to any ipv6 sites and/or ipv6 test sites (ipv6 tests fail). IPv4 always works. There's no problem with IPv4.
So I'm wondering if Cisco tested these routers for a couple hours but never did any long term tests? Or maybe the problem is with AT&T? It would be too big of a coincidence for it to happen on several windows computers and apple devices at the same time to be a device problem. It's failed the IPv6 tests with friend's ipads and Windows 7 computers also.This issue has occurred on all versions of cloud and classic firmware including the latest 2.1.39.145204. The only way to get IPv6 back working again is to power cycle the DSL modem (in bridge mode) and E4200v2. It doesn't matter if the 6rd is configured to automatic or manual using AT&T's published BR settings. Same result. IPv6 lasts for a few hours.And it doesn't matter if the modem is in bridge mode, or if I configure Lan-to-Wan or L-W with IP pass through.....same result.
i have a 7201 router with NPE-G2. i have a design which i have the option to send all the traffic through a GRE tunnel or a L2TPV3 tunnel.which method is more CPU consumption ?
I have a setup involving 3 clustered AP541 running off a sg300 switch. The wireless network setup VAP has one entry for vlan 1 with station isolation disabled. Is there anything more I need to do to allow one wireless client to ping another wireless client - am I missing something - i assume this is possible.Needless to say wireless clients can ping non wireless clients and vice versa quite happily. Everything is running with factory default settings more or less.
I have to go back into settings and deactivate the IPV6 tunnel daily to keep access to youtube. My provider does not support IPV6. Saving changes has no effectIs there a way to ensure that the IPV6 tunnel remains deactivated?I have firmware version 1.0.30 build 126544 2011-12-24. Firmware update function says I got the latest version.
I am using a Cisco RV110W (Firmware 1.2.09) in a branch and I would like to create a VPN Tunnel to another site that has a Cisco RV042 (firmware v4.2.1.02)
What would be the correct Configuration? the current configuration I am using is
in the RV042 i am using
Check Enable Local Group Setup Local Security Gateway Type : IP Only IP Address : RV042 Pulbic IP address
I have recently purchased a E4200 i have flashed it with the latest Firmware 1.0.03 and Hard Reset the Router so the Media issue was resolved i was having. After upgrading the firmware to the latest version my Nortel VPN IPSEC Client no longer will work. The tunnel is connected and it passes traffic for about 15 seconds then nothing. The connection remains connected but no traffic passes cant ping across tunnel. I have checked all the settings and VPN - IPSEC - Passthru is enabled. I have put the client in DMZ mode and tried that same thing.
i have my Cisco E4200 set up with a 6rd tunnel. the tunnel seems to work fine for the most part. i can ping ipv6.google.com and get a response.however, i cannot ping the addresses of the IPv6 Tunnel ends from within my network. If i run a ping from outside the network, i can ping the IPv6 address of the server end, however, i cannot ping the E4200's end of the tunnel. is there a specific option that needs to be set? i have allowed ping so that my IPv4 address is pingable, am i missing something for IPv6?
I want to use a wrt54gp2 as a wireless client to give a phone plugged into one if it's phone jacks connectivity to the Internet via the wireless internet gateway router I have.This will require the wrt54gp2 to pair with the wireless router and provide a WPA(2 preferred) key.
