its a hardware problem or just not get power to module 1 for module WS-X6748-GE-TX? this is the capture from show module and sh log :
------------------ show module ------------------
Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No. --- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ ----------- 1 48 CEF720 48 port 10/100/1000mb Ethernet WS-X6748-GE-TX xxx 5 2 Route Switch Processor 720 (Active) RSP720-3CXL-GE xxx Mod MAC addresses Hw Fw Sw Status
I have a WS-X6748-GE-TX with the WS-F6700-CFC daughter card. Is it possible to replace the WS-F6700-CFC daughter card with a WS-F6K-DFC4-AXL to make this compatible with the SUP-2T? Or, are there differences between the CFC and DFC base modules?
I have a fresh piece of 7606-S router, i am planning to install a new IOS ( 15.2.4S or 12.2.33-SRD8 ) SIP-200 / RSP720 moduls ... would ypu plese provides me a configuration guide for installing IOS for 7600 serise router.I have the image on TFTP server.
I have a cisco 6509 switch in which i have 2 SUPs. I am using 3 Qty. of WS-X6748-GE-TX in the same switch. First 24 ports of module 1 and are not working. I replace the faulty moldule with the working one but now the new (good) module's first 12 ports stopped working. But when I insert the good card (the replaced one with the faulty) in other chassis it works fine.
We are upgrading two standalone 6509E chassis to a VSS system with new VS-S720-10G-3C cards. The 6509's have WS-X6748-GE-TX card with DFC3B daughter cards (see below). The compatablity matrix (see below) states that 67xx cards are supported but it goes on to state DFC3C or DFC3CXL cards are needed. So does this mean that the existing WS-X6748-GE-TX cards have to be upgraded or will they be supported?
Core #1Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ ----------- 1 48 CEF720 48 port 1000mb SFP WS-X6748-SFP SAL 2 4 CEF720 4 port 10-Gigabit Ethernet WS-X6704-10GE SAD 5 2 Supervisor Engine 720 (Active) WS-SUP720-3B SAL 6 2 Supervisor Engine 720 (Hot) WS-SUP720-3B SAL 7 48 CEF720 48 port 10/100/1000mb Ethernet WS-X6748-GE-TX SAL 8 48 CEF720 48 port 10/100/1000mb Ethernet WS-X6748-GE-TX SAL
currenly running a C6509E, with a WS-SUP720-3B running IOS level S72033-adventerprisek9_wan-MZ.122-22.SXH3. I want to install a WS-X6748-GE-TX blade and would like NOT to have to upgrade IOS at this time. Future migrations are planned. Can this be done?
we have 2 WS-X6516-GE-TX, WS-X6516A-GBIC, and a WS-X6748-GE-TX with a WS-F6700-CFC daughtercard
our sup is a WS-SUP720-3B
we are experiencing packet loss for everything connected in the WS-X6748-GE-TX blade, right now we dont have any production device in that blade due to the packet loss we are experiencing.
this switch was running hybrid before it is now running native ios, however I can't recall if we didn't have that packet loss before. do i need to update a firmware of the card or daughtercard (if this is possible, can't say i've done it before).
I've installed second WS-X6748-SFP linecard on my catalyst 6509 with sup720-3b and after that NAM-2 and IDSM-2 module become inaccessible from management network. I can only login with session slot N proc 1.When I execute #hw-module module 4 reset, modules become accessible.
#sh module from cat6509
Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No. --- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ ----------- 2 48 CEF720 48 port 1000mb SFP WS-X6748-SFP SAL114670XW 3 48 48-port 100FX SFP Ethernet Module WS-X6148-FE-SFP SAL1201BZKF 4 48 CEF720 48 port 1000mb SFP WS-X6748-SFP SAL1625ETFJ 5 2 Supervisor Engine 720 (Active) WS-SUP720-3B SAL1206FNGQ 6 2 Supervisor Engine 720 (Hot) WS-SUP720-3B SAL1206FVFB 8 8 Intrusion Detection System WS-SVC-IDSM-2 SAD120502LR 9 8 Network Analysis Module WS-SVC-NAM-2 SAD120206LB
Mod MAC addresses Hw Fw Sw Status --- ---------------------------------- ------ ------------ ------------ ------- 2 001e.4a3e.3b30 to 001e.4a3e.3b5f 1.10 12.2(14r)S5 12.2(18)SXF1 Ok 3 001e.4aea.e7b0 to 001e.4aea.e7df 3.3 8.4(1) 8.5(0.46)RFW Ok 4 5057.a895.bb84 to 5057.a895.bbb3 2.4 12.2(18r)S1 12.2(18)SXF1 Ok 5 001c.58d0.6dc4 to 001c.58d0.6dc7 5.6 8.5(2) 12.2(18)SXF1 Ok 6 0016.c848.3698 to 0016.c848.369b 5.6 8.5(2) 12.2(18)SXF1 Ok 8 001e.f7a1.54b0 to 001e.f7a1.54b7 6.3 7.2(1) 7.0(8)E4 Ok 9 001e.f72a.ba62 to 001e.f72a.ba69 4.3 7.2(1) 5.1(2) Ok
Mod Sub-Module Model Serial Hw Status ---- --------------------------- ------------------ ----------- ------- ------- 2 Centralized Forwarding Card WS-F6700-CFC SAL114881B6 4.0 Ok 4 Centralized Forwarding Card WS-F6700-CFC SAL1624EGQS 4.1 Ok 5 Policy Feature Card 3 WS-F6K-PFC3B SAL1206FNZY 2.3 Ok 5 MSFC3 Daughterboard WS-SUP720 SAL1206FSFH 3.1 Ok 6 Policy Feature Card 3 WS-F6K-PFC3B SAL1206FP27 2.3 Ok 6 MSFC3 Daughterboard WS-SUP720 SAL1206FN26 3.1 Ok 8 IDS 2 accelerator board WS-SVC-IDSUPG ADBG7270048 2.5 Ok
I have two Cisco 7606 routers using BGP to connect our customers to the internet. Recently we added a new 1G circuit in addition to an existing 1G circuit and all traffic inbound is now on this new 1G circuit. We would like to shift some of the inbound traffic over to the other 7606. Our Tier provider has the same AS number for both paths. One path goes directly to New York and the other goes to Boston then New York.
I have made an etherchannel between 6509 and 7606 with two giga interfaces on eatch one to have more bandwidth (2Go), but the Etherchannel does not exceed 1 GB (Below is a capture for Etherchannel taken from Solarwinds).the both 6506 and 7606 use ws sup 720 3bxl
Our router suddenly reloaded. Below are the crashinfo obtained:
7606_Router#more sup-bootflash:crashinfo_20120604-02260500:00:05: %PFREDUN-6-ACTIVE: Initializing as ACTIVE processor 00:00:05: %SYS-3-LOGGER_FLUSHING: System pausing to ensure console debugging output. 00:00:05: %PFREDUN-6-ACTIVE: Initializing as ACTIVE processor 00:00:05: %SYS-3-LOGGER_FLUSHED: System was paused for 00:00:00 to ensure console debugging output.
We are running s72033-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF9
I've already found this kinds of cases, in this community. So, It seems that Changing the current configuration to 'mls aging fast threshold ## time ## ' is most suitable in our situation.But, I don't know how to calculate the apt threshold value and time value.
 sh run | in mls mls ip multicast flow-stat-timer 9 mls flow ip interface-full no mls flow ipv6 no mls acl tcam share-global mls cef error action freeze
I have my router 7606-S rebooted by itself. According to output of show version command it's rebooted by software bug.
================ Snipped from crashinfo file ================= Jan 14 05:33:50.822 GMT+7: %C7600_MEM_ECC-2-MBE: Multiple bit error detected at 0xC09F4D38 Jan 14 05:33:50.822 GMT+7: %C7600_MEM_ECC-3-SYNDROME_MBE: 8-bit Syndrome for the detected Multi-bit error: 0x0 05:33:50 GMT+7 Sat Jan 14 2012: Unexpected exception to CPU: vector 1500, PC = 0xB7922BC , LR = 0xB792250
==================== Show Version ====================== Cisco IOS Software, c7600rsp72043_rp Software (c7600rsp72043_rp-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 15.1(1)S1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Technical Support: [URL] Copyright (c) 1986-2011 by Cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Thu 10-Feb-11 19:27 by prod_rel_team
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(33r)SRD5, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) BOOTLDR: Cisco IOS Software, c7600rsp72043_rp Software (c7600rsp72043_rp-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 15.1(1)S1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) [Code]...
I have a cisco 7606-S with dual RSP720-3CXL. Devices reloaded and now none of the RSPs are booting.When I have tried to take the console using only one RSP, card going to rommon mode after that it hangs. I guess its firmware is corrupted.
we have a chassis 6513-E and a module WS-X6748-GE-TX, I'd like to know if could I put this module in any slot, since the documentation from Cisco says that any slot from a chassis 6500-E Series can support this module. And then in the documentation of WS-X6748-GE-TX says that this module is not compatible in the slots 1-8 of the 6513 chassis, only from 9th to 13th slots, in those slots from the 6513-E we already have 4x WS-X6748-GE-TX, and we'd like to know if could we put the module in the rest of the slots. The 6513, and 6513-E is kind of confusing.
We have a 6513 which had 2x 8port (WS-X6708-10GE) 10GB modules one in slot 10 and another in slot 12. Between this two modules we created a 4 port trunk 40GB (2 ports in each module) between the 6513 and a Nexus 7018. Yesterday we swopped one of the moduless for a 16 port 10GB (WS-X6716-10GE) and cannot trunk between the two cards. Only 2 ports work in either one or the other. Seems because of the difference between them (DFC3CXL & DFC3C). Taking a look at the logging we noticed something to the fact of incompatability QOS feature between them.
We have a WS-X6824-SFP-2T card that we need to use temporarily in a 6500 that still has a Sup720. Can I swap the DFC for a CFC and make it work? I'm guessing I can because you can upgrade a 6724 with a DFC4-A.
confirm the C3KX-NM-10G module is hot-swappable.i have checked the cisco's website and it says " Although network modules are hot-swappable, we recommend installing a network module before powering the switch"
What steps i need to follow to install the module?
I have "inherited" a Catalyst 4506 with IOS version 12.2(20)EWA1 and Supervisor IV already installed. We recently purchased a second Supervisor IV and I am looking to install this second supervisor for redundancy. Is there anything special with installing a second supervisor or so I just physically install the new supervisor and the IOS will automatically set everything up?
We will install a new Supervisor Engine in our Nexus 7010.One Supervisor Engine is already installed an 1Year old.So the Problem is that both Supervisor Engines may have different NX-OS version.Could this lead to a problem?Does the installed Supervisor Engine "udate" the newer Supervisor engine?
We are looking forward to install a Cisco 6513 with IDSM-2 in each chassis in a VSS mode. Any experience with the configuration of the 6513 ? Also, lets assume I installed one active IDSM in each chassis with identical configuration... what happens when one of them fails ?
The DHCP/DNS server is on ip address 10.1.100.103 with an alt on .102 I'm attempting to integrate a 4510R+E into an existing network and use existing DHCP/DNS windows 2008 server to push out IP addresses to connected computers.
I want to assign a VLAN to every port for management purposes and then I put an IP helper address on every VLAN.
I've attached a the 4500E partial config. I'm attempting to get Gi1/44 to a state where I can plug a computer into it an resolve an ip address and gain internet access like all the devices on the existing network can do.
I've created a new scope in DHCP with the ip subnet of 10.60.211.0 255.255.255.0 It leases addresses from .1 to .253
The computer will not resolve ip addresses with this config.