Cisco Routers :: RV042 - Firewall And SPI Enabled

Jan 14, 2013

this is regarding my RV042. Its firmware version is v4.1.1.01-sp (Dec 6 2011 20:03:18), unchanged from how I received it. I purchased less than a month ago. I have a problem wherein the firewall behavior is not what I expect it to be, where I expect only allowed ports/services to be open to a given private IP from the outside but am finding that all are open to that private IP!
 
Let me describe the current configuration. I am going to blank out all digits of the public IP addresses when discussing them except for the final digits for security reasons.Router's WAN1 is set up as static, X.X.X.189. This is part of my public IP block. WAN2 is disabled. One-to-One NAT is enabled. Three instances of it are set up. One, for example is 192.0.2.89 (a private IP) mapped to X.X.X.180, a public IP, part of our public block. Forwarding is not enabled. There is no DMZ Host. That is set to 192.0.2.0. Firewall and SPI are Enabled. Access Rules for the firewall are set up in addition to the default rules which are present to Deny all traffic with WAN1 and WAN2 as the source from any source to any destination. This to me means that unless I set up Allow actions, there should be no access from the outside, WAN1. As an example of one of my Allow rules, I have this:

Action: Allow
Service: HTTP
Log: Not log
Source interface: WAN1
Source IP: ANY
Destination IP: Single, 192.0.2.89
Time: Always

My problem: My expectation is that based on the One-to-One NAT setting, the public IP X.X.X.180 is now associated with the private IP 192.0.2.89, but nothing from public to private is allowed unless allowed by the firewall, which is only set to allow HTTP / port 80 to 192.0.2.89. But the behavior is that 192.0.2.89 is, as presently configured, open to everything from the associated public IP, not just port 80, but all ports! It is as if my firewall rules have no impact whatsoever.

View 3 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Routers :: RV042 Opens Ports 80 And 443 When HTTPS Enabled In Firewall?

Nov 15, 2011

I recently installed an RV042 v1.1 vpn router (older hardware revision but using the latest available firmware 1.3.12.19-tm) and set up VPN access with the QuickVPN client.  QuickVPN requires that the HTTPS setting be enabled under the Firewall options, so I did.  I then scanned our static IP with grc.com's ShieldsUP! to check for open or non-stealthed ports and discovered that ports 80 and 443 show as wide open, while port 113 is closed but not stealthed.  If I disable the HTTPS setting under Firewall, then ports 80 and 443 become stealthed.  Is there any way to use QuickVPN and keep these ports stealthed?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 Port Forwarding Stops Working When Firewall Is Enabled

Jun 4, 2013

I have a RV042 router on a single WAN and an internal LAN. I have configured port forwarding as follows: HTTP[TCP/80~80]->10.0.0.6HTTPS[TCP/443~443]->10.0.0.6IMAP[TCP/143~143]->10.0.0.5IMAP SSL[TCP/993~993]->10.0.0.5SMTP SSL[TCP/587~587]->10.0.0.5
 
Everything works just fine when I have the firewall DISABLED. However, when I enable it the behaviour is erratic. 1 out of 10 attempts to connect to ANY port forwarded works. Almost all attempts time out. Notice that this happens even if using only the default firewall rules (which should be bypassed by the port forwarding as I read in other posts).
 
My second try was to create firewall rules manually, overriding the default ones. I tried adding rules from source WAN1 (where my connection is) to ANY and to SINGLE IP's on every port. Nothing seems to work.
 
I don't know what I'm doing wrong, this is really bugging me. I had to turn the firewall off so we can access our servers from outside the office. This shouldn't have to be done.
 
Just found out that my firewall is getting LOTS and LOTS of Blocked - SYN Flood entries. I think this is why we are having trouble with the firewall. Could this be the problem? I have no idea where all these SYN packets are coming from since they appear with spoofed IPs or come from different bots all over.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: 881 With Firewall Features Enabled

Jul 13, 2012

I am doing a security assessment of an organization that uses 871/881 routers with the firewall features enabled.  I see the following commands defining packet inspection done by the firewall software.
 
-ip inspect name inet-users tcp
-ip inspect name inet-users udp
-ip inspect name inet-users icmp
 
What I am trying to define is the inspect name "inet-users".  It is obviously a constant defined by IOS as it is not defined anywhere in the configuration file like any other "variable" and does not generate an error.What does "inet-users" define?  I'm assuming it is all users using the interface(s) where the inspect commands are used, but is that correct?  The Cisco IOS manuals do not contain a reference to "inet-users" hence why I'm here asking.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV082 And Packet Loss On PBX With Firewall Enabled?

Aug 28, 2012

Recent incountered an issue with our elastix pbx and packet loss. Noticed this morning that when I turn on the firewall on our RV082, packet loss begins around the level 3 servers I see in my traceroute, and then slow spread out to all hops. When I turn the firewall back off, all hops have no packet loss or less than 1%. The weird part is, previously, I had the firewall enabled, and never had this issue.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV082 V03 Randomly Connection Lost When Firewall Enabled

Sep 11, 2012

Hardware: RV082 V03
Firmware: RV0XX-v4.2.1.02
Lan: 192.168.1.0/255
Static routing: 192.168.1.239 to 172.25.152.64/224

The unit is configured as internet gateway. 4 NAT ports are active. When firewall disabled all works fine. When firewall enabled I do get connection lost at random interval. In firewall only 4 rules added to the default 3 rules. The added rules are:

1/ permit 192.168.1.22 port 25 to any
2/ permit 192.168.1.27 port 25 to any
3/ permit 192.168.1.10 port 25 to any
4/ deny any port 25 to any
 
I do get at random times connection lost when navigating with windows explorer on a PC with IP 192.168.1.x to a share on a PC with IP 172.25.152.74. The same happens when copying files.  Sometimes it works, later it fails or reties are needed.  When the firewall is switched off all runs fine.

Ping from 192.168.1.x to 172.25.152.74 allways give a <1ms response
 
Is there a RV082 perfomance problem or do I have a configuration problem?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 Firewall With Windows 8

Mar 20, 2013

I recently bought my daughter a refurshed dell 17" laptop which has Windows 8 home edition on it. She also has another smaller laptop with windows 7 on it, an X-box-360 and a PS3 all connected to this RV042 Business router.
 
I do not have access to the firmware version of the RV042. I believe it was updated in 2011 or early 2012.
 
We found out that with the RV042 firewall set to ON, she is UNABLE to hit her college website with the new win 8 computer
She CAN go to the college web site with the smaller win 7 computer when the firewall is off or on.
 
The win 8 computer will allow google searches, but when you click on any of the links, it will not load.With the win 8 computer, facebook will not load, MSN and Hotmail will not load.
 
Disable firewall, and most (if not all) items that did not work, magically DO work when the RV042 firewall is disabled for the win 8 laptop.
 
Having issues with with win 8 home edition and the RV042 firewall enabled? Is there a "simple" cure for this, other than slicking the laptop and putting win 7 on it?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 Firewall Slows VPN Traffic

Sep 9, 2011

Replaced an older RV042 that had damage from lightning. The new RV042 is V03 with firmware 4.0.0.7. This router supports 7 branch offices using site-to-site VPN to other RV042 routers. After connecting the new RV042 at the main office, three of the branch offices had very slow response over the VPN tunnel. I disabled the firewall on the new RV042 and the problem resolved. The three branches with the problem have Windows 7 systems and the other 4 have Windows XP. I confirmed that the Windows firewall was disabled on the Windows 7 systems.I did try leaving the firewall enabled and disabling SPI, but that didn't work. Have to have firewall disabled to resolve the problem. I would not expect the firewall on the main office RV042 to affect VPN tunnel traffic, but apparently it does. Do we need specific access rules to fix the issue. It works fine with firewall disbaled, but I'd be more comfortable with it enabled.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: Rv042 As Vpn Behind Juniper SSG5 Firewall

Aug 25, 2012

I need to configure a new RV042 behind a SSG5 firewall. All VPN connections is client to gateway.
 
Firstly, i tried doing a direct connection(bypassing the firewall), the quickVpn status says connect but I can't even ping the rv. I suspect is due to client own ip is 192.168.1.x and the gateway ip is also 192.168.1.10. How do I resolve this such that users can connect anywhere without having to worry about clash of ip?

View 10 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 V3 Firewall Access Rules Configuration?

Apr 8, 2012

I wanna block the Lan IP address(eg:192.168.2.106) to visit wan web, and allow it to lan.How can i set it in access rules?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 Firewall Page Settings / Interactions?

Feb 5, 2013

I have an RV042 which is being used as an interface to an ISP.The WAN address (public) is obtained via PPPoE.The LAN address (also public) is entered manually from an assigned block of public addresses.  This is the internet gateway for other publicly-addresses devices like firewalls, VPN devices, etc.
 
I have an RV042 to play with as will as one in production that I can access.Because the accesses are both through public addresses, I want to use https to access the device.  I've generated a number of questions as I'm not sure the behavior is understandable to me and maybe the behavior isn't even  consistent.
 
- If the firewall is Disabled, the https setting is still available.  So, presumably https will work with the firewall enabled or disabled?  Is that right?
 
- I take it that the Remote Management setting and port number are associated with the WAN port.  For example, can one set Remote Management ON with port 443 and still access via the LAN on port 80?  on port 443?
 
- If Remote Mangement is OFF then I presume that one cannot access the device through the WAN.  Yet, that seems to not be the case.  I wonder if the public addresses on this device affect this?
 
Well, I guess we might forget about the Port number and just ponder the following - Sort of a truth table:
 
 Remote OFF
    http...........WAN access: NO              LAN access:  YES
    https..........WAN access: NO             LAN access:  YES
Remote ON
    http...........WAN access: YES           LAN access:  YES
    https..........WAN access: YES          LAN access:  YES
 
This is what it would seem to me to be but it doesn't seem to work that way.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 Firewall Multiple External IP Addresses

Oct 6, 2011

if possible with the RV042.Primary External IP address uses port forwards for some ports, all okay.I would like to have other external ip addresses assigned to machines on my lan.Basic host multiple web servers, on different IP addresses, using port 80. [code]
 
From what i am reading, it looks like the RV042 can do this, but I am not real clear what my rules should look like.
 
I would think my high priority rule for each external IP address would be to deny all traffic first for each machine on the lan.Then create one entry with source 202.x.x.2 port 80 -> 192.168.168.2 ?
 
How should I set my rules to do this, and what settings should I have on the Nic of the second machine?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 V3 - Port Forwarding And Firewall Rules On WAN 2

Oct 13, 2011

I have a new (about 4 months old) RV042 V3 4.0.0.07 firmware that I am trying to use in fail over mode.  I have a SOHO and I normally use cable Internet connection.  It is quite fast (15 megabit), but not super reliable.  I have added DSL (3.3 megabit) which is five nines (supposedly) but not so quick. 
 
I have a Westell 7500 wireless DSL modem located in the basement, where the telephone lines enter the building.  This gives me a wireless link to the second floor server room through  a wireless router that connects to WAN 2 of the RV042.   The cable modem is in the server room and connects directly to the WAN 1 of the RV042.  The cable works, but when it goes down, the DSL link comes up but does not allow Internet traffic.  The RV042 is set up as a Bridge and I have set up port forwarding to get the cable to work and used similar firewall commands to route the traffic if the router switched over.  I suspect that the problem is in the port forwarding (port 80) or the firewall rules(which are pretty simple) because everything looks like it switches over, but it just doesn't work on WAN2. 

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 Can't Get Forwarding / Firewall And Client To Gateway VPN

Jun 9, 2012

I'm trying to set up a RV042 to do the following:
 
1) Block all WAN connections, except for:

2) Allow all port 80 connections, and forward to 10.4.20.60

3) Allow all port 443 connections, and forward to 10.4.20.60

4) Allow port 22 connections from specific IP addresses, and forward to 10.4.20.60

5) After a remote client has connected using Client to Gateway VPN, allow that remote client to access anything on the LAN
 
I'm able to do #1-4 above, but I can't get #5 to work. Or I can get #5 to work, but can't implement the restrictions I need in #1-4. Attached are some relevant screenshots. I think the problem is that I have Forwarding rules set up that require me to have a firewall rule to Deny All Traffic from WAN1 (unless I'm specifically allowing it). In the Access Rules screenshot, rule #6 is the problem. If I enable it (thereby denying all WAN1 traffic), then VPN clinents can't access anything on the LAN. However if disable this rule, VPN clinents can access anything on the LAN, but the firewall also opens up all outside connections to SSH, since that's set up in the Forwarding rules. I would have thought that once a remote client is connected using client to gateway VPN, then that client is considered to be on the LAN, as far as the firewall is concerned. Thus a firewall rule (like #6) that is specified for WAN1 shouldn't effect remote VPN clients.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 LAN Subnet Restriction And Firewall Bypassed For One To One NAT

Mar 31, 2013

I have 2 questions to confirm and/or get direction on how to modify.
 
1) is there a way to get around the (seemingly arbitrary) class C (slash 24+) subnet restriction for the primary/main IP address for the internal LAN?

(I realize I can setup multiple internal subnets but that also seems to introduce restrictions for port ‘forwarding’ and ‘one-to-one NAT’ use because those features seem to be restricted to the primary/main IP subnet)
 
2) it seems like all traffic is passed to the host on the internal side of a ‘One-to-One NAT’ regardeless of the firewall rules in place, is that what is be expected?

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 Portforwarding Overrule Firewall Rule?

Nov 1, 2011

We have a setup where our e-mail server is hosted in-house.Our network is connected through a RV042 gateway. Port 25 is forwarded to our internal e-mail server.Our smtp service should be limited to receiving incomming connections only from 4 specific ip ranges which I set up in the firewall rules.The reason is that all smtp is managed and protected by an external anti-spam/vires provider.
 
However it looks like any computer is able to connect to our port 25 and be forwarded to our e-mail server.Does portforwarding overrule firewall rules - ie. you can not limit access with the firewall if you decide to port forward?Is this a "fixable" situation - or is the RV042 not built for handling this setup?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 Hardware V 1.2 Firewall Is Blocking Some Incoming Mail

Dec 4, 2011

I'm having an issue where our RV042 router is blocking some of our customers from sending us e-mails.I noticed thatCISCO has produced a newer version of the RVO42 V3.0 and has firmware version 4.x. can you upgrade the Linksys RV042 Hardware V 1.2 to the 4.x firmware? I have found a few articles and forums online about otherpeople having the same issue with the RV042 v1 randomly blocking, e-mail but no one ever has a solution to correct the issue.Some people have recommend to roll back to factory default and reconfigure the router as the config may by corrupt.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: Does RV042 Router / Firewall Support Port Forwarding From Internet

Aug 5, 2011

I am using an RV042 router/firewall -- firmware v1.3.13.02-tm -- connected to a cable modem.I have one public address (WAN1) assigned by my ISP's DHCP server.All my machines on the LAN have static IPs.  (RV042 DHCP Server is disabled.)I have set up port (80) forwarding to 192.168.1.101 The HTTP port forwarding does work if an http client on the LAN sends a request to http://<public-ip>:80But I cannot get a response if I send a request to  http://<public-ip>:80 from a machine on the WAN.
 
I  did configure Access Rules to allow http traffic (and then tried to  allow *all* traffic) between a single IP on the WAN and 192.168.1.101 The  incoming log table shows a connection is made from the http client on the internet to the correct http server on the LAN, but there is no resonse  from the LAN to the remote client.Is my configuration the problem, or is this feature not supported by the RV042 router? Could my cable modem be blocking outbound traffic?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 - Site To Site VPN And Behind Juniper Firewall

Mar 25, 2013

I have no problem configuring both devices to successfully connect when the juniper firewall isn't in the picture.  But due to policy; the RV042 at our main site must sit behind the firewall.
 
I've got the port forwarding setup but I'm not able to connect.  I know I"m missing some configuration on the RV042 but I can't think of it! I've attached a GIF to give an example of both setups.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: How To Verify If CG-NMS Is Enabled On ASA5520

Apr 11, 2013

how do I verify if CG-NMS is enabled on ASA5520. I just need to know if it's enable/install to be enabled and used?Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software Version 8.0(5)28..Device Manager Version 6.1(5)51

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV082 VPN To ASA5500 Device Crashes When Keep-alive Enabled?

Dec 19, 2011

We have several RV082s here which are intended to connect to a central ASA5510 firewall. The VPNs are configured and do work basically, however in our test environment the RV082s kept crashing after an apparently unpredictable amount of time (sometimes after several days or even weeks). All the RV082 have the newest firmware installed (v4.1.0.02-tm).
 
When further investigating the issue, I found out that the crashes can be reproduced when enabling the keep-alive option on the RV082. When powering up the RV082, they boot, start up the VPN, and then they crash a few seconds after the tunnel has been established (one or two pings usually get through). When crashing, the RV082 becomes completely unreachable, ie no ping, no webinterface etc.
 
There is a note in the firmware release notes saying that enabling the keep-alive option would not work the way it should. However it seems that enabling that option lets the router completely crash after its next reboot. This makes the keep-alive option basically worthless, however we need this since the routers will get installed at remote sites with no personnel available there.
 
Is there any way to enable the keep-alive option without making the routers crash immediately after startup?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: Auto / Programmatic UPnP Port Forwarding For RV042 And E4200 Routers

Jan 24, 2013

I have RV042 and E4200 routers . I tried the manual UPnP port forwarding using Rv042  router and was succesful ( by typing 192.168.1.1  in the explorer and  logged in using user name and password )
 
I am using a linux embedded system  whose  Internal IP ,Internal port  are mapped  .This system is connected to one of the LAN ports    
 
I want to try auto UPnP port forwarding both for  RV042 router and Linksys E4200 routers 
 
After  enabling the Upnp option only  and logging out ,Can i add a port mapping entry in this router without logging in  using  a  C++ program  which runs on  linux embedded system .

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 / RV042G / Small Business Routers With Inter-VLAN Capability

Aug 22, 2012

I was looking for a small business router that has VPN support and dual WAN support for load balancing. Upon reading reviews, I think RV042/RV042G is a good choice. Now am thinking if it supports intervlan/ router-on-a-stick configuration?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Upgrade ASA 5550 With NAT Controller Enabled

Dec 29, 2011

I should upgrade ASA 5550 with nat controller enabled, from 7.2 to 8.x, I've been reading nat is differently configured up from release 8.3. So I choosed to upgrade to 8.2 release.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042G - ProtectLink Enabled To Filter Out Various Categories From Network Traffic

Jun 29, 2012

I have upgraded to the new RV042G to take advantage of the gigabit Ethernet speeds and to prepare for when our ISP upgrades our bandwidth. I currently use the RV042 with Protect Link enabled to filter out various categories from our network traffic. I noticed that this feature is not included with the RV042G.

Is this something Cisco will decide to add back in later? In the meantime, how to block content on the network? The basic URL and keyword filter will not meet our needs, since it is much easier to let a service such as Trend Micro manage what is blocked in the categories they offer.

View 2 Replies View Related

D-Link DIR-615 :: DSL-526B Can Firewall And NAT Remain Enabled

May 11, 2011

I am using the router DIR-825 together with a modem-router DSL-526B. After reading many posts, I understand that I have to bridge the DSL-526B and use the more complete DIR-825 under PPOE to connect to Internet. However, when bridging the DSL-526B, the settings are showing after setup that the firewall and NAT are enabled whereas, when looking at the quick bridging setup in the manual, it seems that they should be disabled. My questions are therefore:

In bridging mode, can the firewall and NAT remain enabled, what can possibly create a conflict with those of the DIR-825 or create complication? If yes, how to disable them, as no option for doing it in the briging quick set up?

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 2821 - High Latency With IOS Url Filtering Enabled

Aug 20, 2011

Im notice after configure the trend micro url filtering on a Cisco 2821 high latency on Http navigation, the latency on the ping for the requests shows a 245ms latency, but if i disable this feature on the router, returns to normal navigation and decrease the latency up to 70ms.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Enabling RIP On PIX 535 / Error / OSPF / RIP Cannot Be Enabled On Failover Interface

Jun 29, 2012

I am getting this error on my PIX 535 with 8.0.4 code. The error is Error : OSPF/RIP cannot be enabled on failover interface, I am getting this error while trying to enable RIP on the firewall. The context is single mode and failover is enabled. When I am disabling the failover the Firewall is accepting the RIP configurations.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Cannot Access FWSM Via Session Command In 6513 (VSS Enabled)

Apr 24, 2012

Today i received FWSM from cisco (RMA), I need to configure it as standby unit for existing FWSM active/standby setup.
 
IOS on RMAed FWSM is 2.3.4 and  cisco VSS supports FWSM IOS 4.0.4 and later.My issue is, I cannot access FWSM (IOS 2.3.4) via session command from cisco 6513 but could successfully consoled it without any problem. I have reloaded it twice and also tried to disable and enable power on it.
 
VSS#sh module switch 2
 Switch Number:     2   Role:  Virtual Switch Standby
Mod Ports Card Type                              Model              Serial No.
--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ -----------
   2    6  Firewall Module                        WS-SVC-FWM-1  -----------

[code]....

why I cannot access FWSM through session command ?Whether this is because of older IOS ? If yes then how to upgrade its IOS ?Is it possible to upgrade IOS via FWSM console ? if yes, Do i need to test on different slot ? 

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Block Gtalk On New 2911 Security Enabled Router?

May 8, 2010

I want to block gtalk on my new cisco 2911 security enabled router.

View 3 Replies View Related

Linksys Cable / DSL :: WAG320NVPN Passthrough Enabled / No Port Forwarding Set Up / Firewall Disabled

Aug 23, 2011

Using a Mac running Mac OS X 10.6.8 with VPN Tracker 6.3.0.Before switching to the WAG320N I had no issues with my IPSEC VPN client. After the switch it consistently fails in Phase 1 negotiation.In the log file of the gateway I only notice: Mon, 2011-08-22 07:47:31 - [Outgoing] UDP Packet - 192.168.1.100:500 --> IP.ADDRESS.VPN.GATEWAY:500.The software itself complains about timeouts while contacting the remote gateway.VPN pass through is enabled, no port forwarding is set up, firewall is disabled.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Rv042 - Firewall Access Rule

Jun 3, 2013

I have a server behind an rv042 that i would like to block access to on one port from outside in.  I have configured the rule as follows:
 
priority = 1.  policy name<name>.  enable<checked>.  action = deny.  service <service to block>. source interface = wan1.  sources = any.  destination = <public ip address of server>.  day <nothing>. 

This does not block the intended port from outside.  I also changed the destination to be the private ip address and i changed the source interface to LAN and to *.  What is the correct syntax to do this?.  Port forwarding is enabled.  I noticed that there is one entry in the forwarding table for the public ip but it is going to a dead private ip address.  Would this have an effect? 

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 Won't Get Second IP

Feb 27, 2012

I have two Internet connections-
 
1-DSL Modem (WAN1-Internet Port)
 
2-Cable Modem-Comcast (WAN2-DMZ/Internet Port)
 
I connected the DSL (WAN1-Internet) port in and the Cisco RV042 was able to get an IP automatically. I tested the connection and it works just fine. Then I connect the Cable Modem-Comcast (WAN2-DMZ/Internet Port) in and I have the RV042 automatically optain IP address. But it just says 0.0.0.0. I've tried release/renew and that does nothing. Also, when I connect the 2nd Internet connection the Internet goes down. The only way it goes back up is when I disable under the PORT MANAGMENT setting.
 
All the settings have been kept to the default.How can I get the router to obtain an IP address from the Cable Modem-Comcast (WAN2 DMZ/Internet Port).

View 5 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved