I am getting this error on my PIX 535 with 8.0.4 code. The error is Error : OSPF/RIP cannot be enabled on failover interface, I am getting this error while trying to enable RIP on the firewall. The context is single mode and failover is enabled. When I am disabling the failover the Firewall is accepting the RIP configurations.
View 2 Replies
I have two switches and two ASA in active/standby as connected below. These devices are running OSPF 128 in one area (Area 0).I'm pinging from both laptops to each other both ways. The ASA has the latest "8.6.1-5" image. I've configured the firewall failover polltime to 1s with holdtime of 4s. Pings both ways OK.
<LAPTOP> IP:10.112.132.10/24
| [ACCESS PORT VLAN10]
/ <SWITCH> [SVI VLAN10: IP:10.112.132.1/24]
/ [SVI VLAN20: IP:10.113.128.11/28]
.12 / [ACCESS PORT VLAN20] .13
[code]....
I fail the primary firewall (ASA-ACTIVE). I get a 4 seconds ping loss which is expected (holdtime) however after 10 seconds of pings I get another outage which last anywhere between 5 and 15 seconds. I've done a fair amount of debugging and I did notice that the second outage occurs with the OSPF neighbor goes from "loading" to "full". This doesn't make any sense because the routing table is fully populated when going to “full”.
When perfoming a manual fail back (type failover active on ASA-ACTIVE), pings goes on for approximately 10seconds and then an outage between 5 to 15 seconds. Agsin this outage occurs when OSPF neighbor goes from "loading" to "full".I've tried debugging on the switches and found nothing.
I've got a ASA 5550 firewall interface failover issue. (File attached).
when I shut down the inside interface Gi 1/1 of the left firewall(Active firewall), It failed to failover. but when I shut down the Gi 1/12 of the Core 1 switch, The firewall failover very well.
I followed this guide but I was not able to failover. [URL]
how can I configure so that when the Gi 1/1 or Gi 1/0 interface goes down, it can failover ? Code...
I have enabled SSH on my 3750 switches and notice that https is not working. Iam not sure they are related but seems to be oddly coincidental. Therefore find it diffficult to monitor using CNA 5.7.6.
configs are given below
gvadc-sf01#sh run | i ip http
ip http server
ip http access-class 11
ip http secure-server
From my machine, i should normally have access to https running on the switch but isnt the case..
Do I need to generate a new crypto key separately for https?
I have a Cisco ASA 5505 in our office. We are currently using Interface 0 for outside and 1 for inside. We only have 1 Vlan in our environment. We have two three switches behind the firewall. Today the uplink to Interface 1, to the firewall, on the switch went bad. I want to setup a second inside interface on the firewall and configure it as failover incase this happens again. I want to attach it to the other switch. Can I do this? If so, what do I need to do? would it only be a passive/standby interface?
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe are having Cisco ASA 5540 having Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software Version 8.0(5)23 at certain time of moment daily wer are facing latency and packetdrop wherin when I checked for ASA Interface which gives me " Input Errors" on outside interface ,so can any one tell me what are the causes to get input errors on cisco asa outisde interface.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am looking to change my Failover Int IPs on my PIX 515E Bundle, Cisco PIX Firewall Version 6.3(5)123 with the least impact on the network.
For example:
interface ethernet5 "state"
IP address 172.18.0.245, subnet mask 255.255.255.252
ip address state 172.18.0.245 255.255.255.252
failover ip address state 172.18.0.246
I want to change these lines to .....
interface ethernet5 "state"
IP address 172.18.0.185, subnet mask 255.255.255.252
ip address state 172.18.0.185 255.255.255.252
failover ip address state 172.18.0.186
I have two ASA 5540s, ver 8.4 configured in Active/Standby failover.I am also using the redundant interface feature for my Inside interface. Gig0/0 is the active primary and Gig0/1 is standby.
I will activate failover monitoring of the Inside interface using the monitor inside command.
My question concerns the failover monitoring of the redundant interface. If the gig0/0 connection were to fail would the Gig0/1 interface become Active, AND simultaneously result in a full device failover?
Or, does Gig0/1 of the Inside interface redundant pair simply become active and not change the Inside interface device failover state? Thus NOT resulting in a device failover.
I am trying to configure two ASA-5505 as a failover pair. Software 8.2.5 and ASDM 6.4.5.206 Using the wizard i get to step3 .. then nothing happens. Trying direct in asdm but the only interface i can choose is "--None Unnamed-"
View 1 Replies View RelatedFrom ASA 5520 we tested the interface failover it not working even the interface are getting monitor .
primary is active.
Manually we shut the outside interface of the primary device configuration is getting reflecting in secondary as outside interface shut. Interface failover not happen.
ii All the interface are getting monitor when we gave command sh failover. even though when we shut outside interface failove not happening.
how to do the interface failover in ASA 8.4 version.
I have two ASA in failover with Active/standby configuration. When I switch from standby to active from the standby ASA I get a lot (like 100) of error messages like these below: [code] The failover works fine and nothing seems to be wrong with the firewalls function.
-Hardware is ASA5585-SSP-10.
-Software version: ASA 8.2(5),
ASA is in multiple mode with 17 active context. Why these error messages appear and what they mean?
Do I correctly understand that when two ASA 5510 are in fail over pair, the switchover from primary to secondary if one interface of primary goes down shall happen ONLY if failover link is up? So when the fail over link is down and one interface on primary got down also, interface tests between the two ASAs still are being done , but secondary SHALL NEVER try to become active.
In this case why to make tests on data interfaces ? What is the reason to make them? If the knowledge of that some interfaces of primary became down comes through failover link - no need to make additional interface tests - primary will tell about the failure to secondary. If so should run no monitor-interface if name command to dis load devices and network by foolish tests?
Currently l have two ASA 5520's in a active/passive failover scenario. Currently the interfaces for the inside and outside are fixed at 100/FULL.I want to repatch them into GigE ports setup as Auto Negotiate.Is there anyway of keeping the connections through the firewall active in this type of scenrio or will l have downtime disconnecting and repatching? or could l possibly disable failover and reconfigure each ?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI currently have a set of firewalls in active standby configuration running an ospf process injecting a default route into the rest of my network.I noticed when i was testing the failover that the asa's do not actually pass the route tables on failover, thus forcing the need to wait for routes to converge and for the default route to be advertised back into the network. This of course is not acceptable.
Is there a way around this or do I have to setup static default routes on every device in my network. I am trying to avoid setting up default routes on all of the devices because due to the setup of my network I have equal cost links configured in the event of hardware or link failure. So the devices then see an advertised default route from multiple paths.
I have a pair of ASA5510s in a failover configuration where I see these 2 logs repeated every 15 seconds.
105008 1 Nov 27 2012 10:39:27 (Primary) Testing Interface management
105009 1 Nov 27 2012 10:39:28 (Primary) Testing on interface management Passed
I have read other threads where these are accompanied by "105005, Lost Failover communications with mate on interface". But I'm only getting these 2. The other thing that is confusing is that the "management" interface is not the failover interface. So why do I see 105008/9 logs about it?
Output of "sh fail":
5510a# sh fail
Failover On
Failover unit Primary
[Code].....
Have a 1921 that has 3 eth connections (1 LAN, and 2 WAN) - I have 2 seperate OSPF processes (2 areas) on the WAN Ints - both upstream WAN's are sending defaults back to the 1921, and the 1921 is sending it's LAN range to them.
I have ip ospf cost 150 set on the "failover" WAN connection interface (Both on the 1921 and upstream), but the 1921 is preferring the default route from the "failover"?
The default routes are both being received by the 1921, but it's preferring the "failover" Int with the ip ospf cost 150 configured?
I have two ospf processes running on a single 3570 edge router that has a dedicated transport circuit back to our network core. We are adding an additional "transport" only circuit into a new location that is also apart of the second ospf process backbone which will connect back to our core. There will also be a 3750 for this new circuit termination. Currently we are only redistributing ospf process 2 into ospf process 1 (1 = core backbone).
#router ospf 1
#redistribute ospf 2 subnet
We have no need to have ospf process 1 redistributed into the process 2 tables. That being said, when we add an additional transport ciruit, or path back to our core backbone, will this configuration present any issues with the redistribution process and failover.
I have a slew of 106001 messages coming into ASA log, from the outside interface. it appears like most of them are for standard traffic, such as TCP 80/443. i suspect these messages are from clients on the inside who have initiated connections to the internet, but then the client abruptly terminates application of something similar. Server side finally issues a close connection, reset or something else. Here is an example, with the ASA address being 1.1.1.195 (changed to protect the innocent ).
Another theory is that the NAT ip for clients is different than the actual interface IP, so that is behaving differently. For example, once the xlate times out, the IP used for the xlate is no longer active and any return packets to the interface would also error out - be refused. If the xlate was using the interface IP, that it would always respond in some way?
I can bump 106001 down to notification (5) or informational (6) level.
I am really stuck in enabling ip routing though a simple task. I have configured 10 v LAN's in stacked 3750 switches have ip base image. I want to enable ip routing for inter V LAN communication but it is giving this error:
%COMMON_FIB-4-ISSUENCODEWRONGLEN: Message IPv6 global features, rev B for slots 2 (0x4) is wrong length (10, should be 7).
RIPv2 And Disabling / re-enabling Interface
View 5 Replies View Related1552 E Ap with a 2504 WLC. Single Root Ap with Mesh the Mesh has the problem. Both Power Injector and AP has been replaced . How do you turn on the 802.11 B Radio? No other problems at 40 other sites with identical installation.
View 1 Replies View Relatedthe DNS error and was able to fix it but I have a new error. I currently use a Motorola SURFboard SB5101 USB Cable modem and am having an issue. I have tried repairing it and I receive a message "TCP/IP is not enabled for this enabled for this connection. Cannot proceed." I currently have 3 LAN or High-speed internet connections that are showing up. Two are the ones I have said earlier and the third is a Intel(R) PRO/100 VE Network Connection #2. All are connected and firewalled but I cannot use the internet.
View 1 Replies View RelatedDoes OSPF work between a VSS L3 MEC & an ASA Redundant Interface? Both 6509 are in VSS and a L3 MEC is formed to the ASA.Both ASA ports are a part of a L3 Redundant Interface. Please note there is only a single ASA in this topology. [code] Now, the OSPF neighboring does occur and go into the FULL state on this device, however soon enough, the state enters INIT/DROTHER state.But as soon as I disconnect the physical connection 6509(Standby) The OSPF adjacency goes into FULL mode.
View 5 Replies View RelatedWhen accessing the E3200 router using then ERROR 501.Not Implemented.That method is not implemented. The error occured after enabling the "Local Management Access, Access via: HTTPS" option on the Administration > Management tab.I tried different browsers FireFox (version 10), Internet Explorer (version 8,9), the same error was displayed and no acces granted to the E3200 router. I reseted the router and tried the latest firmware 1.0.03 build 9 Feb 1, 2012, but after enablib the option the issue occured again and it is not possible to connect to the router.
View 9 Replies View RelatedI've been having a problem with my cisco routers (7600s) where sub-interfaces that we create for ldp tunnels are added automatically to the main ospf process as no passive when created. In order, here is how to reproduce the issue:
- Configure ospf process as "passive-interface default"
- Configure interfaces that have to be active as "no passive-interface blah"
- ospf works as expected.
- Create new sub- interface somewhere with encapsulation on a certain vlan for xconnect.
- New sub-interface gets added as "no passive-interface" in main ospf process.
- When adding a new port-channel interface, behavior is the same.
Is that normal for cisco, should I continue removing sub-interfaces manually every time from the ospf process?
i'd like to configure OSPF on a Catalyst 6503 IOS 12.2.17.i habe an Gi1/9 with the ip address 192.168.97.30/24 and a VLAN 19 with the IP Address 192.168.19.0/24.I configured OSPF like this
router ospf 1
network 192.168.97.0 0.0.0.255 area 10.5.0.0
network 192.168.19.0 0.0.0.255 area 10.5.0.0
on the ospf peer is see that the adjaceny is established but i don't get the routes for the 192.168.19.0 network i checked the ip ospf interface vlan 19; i got ospf is not enabled on the interface then i tried to configure
int vlan 19
ip ospf 1 area 10.5.0.0
but it does not access ip ospf 1
I want to configure multilink between two Cisco 7206 routers POS interfacesafter configuring both sides.Router 1interface Multilink5 ip address. [code]. I can see both sides through show cdp, also ospf process goes to FULL stateBut traffic is not flow between interfaces, and i can not even ping router's own ip address.When i delete network statement from ospf process, i can ping router's own interface and both routers can ping each other.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI config my E0/0 Interface with "ip ospf network non-broadcast" command, I want this interface to use uni cast to hello neighbor.
As I issue "neighbor x.x.x.x" under ospf process, it told me that: OSPF: Neighbor command is allowed only on NBMA and point-to-multipoint networks. I am sure that there are no any typo, and show ip ospf interface e0/0 says it's been an NBMA interface, so what's wrong with this router?
IOS information:
(C3620-J1S3-M), Version 12.3(18), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3)
I am tasked with configuring a 2504 wireless controller. Is it possible to assign an SSID to an interface that has dynamic ap management enabled?
Scenario:
Location1:
1) 10.0.0.0/24
2)192.168.0.0/24 DMZ
Location 2:
1) 10.0.5.0
Both locations are routable using network 1 at each location. However, I need to configure several access points and send them to location 2. These access points will communicate with the controller at location 1 on network 1. Two SSIDs will need to be on network 1 at location 1. The other SSID will be on Network 2 at location 1. This network is not routable.
I'm currently working on a plan to migrate our 6500's over to our new 7010's. At the time of the migration I want to tighten up our OSPF design and configure OSPF for "passive-interface default" then allow only those interfaces that should have OSPF neighbors to send the hellos. The issue is that the command is not showing up under the OSPF process. What's even more interesting is that the Nexus 5.x Unicast Routing Configuration Guide shows that the "passive-interface default" command should be an option to enter.
I'm currently running version 5.1(4) (though looking to upgrade to 5.2 during my migration testing). I would rather configure the passive-interface via the routing process versus having to enter it on every interface.
I have a ASA 5510 firewall with CSC module and Security Plus license for CSC module.Will you tell me how to configure my firewall to send emails to particular mail ID when someone login into the firewall or any virus attacks from outside.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI need to configure one interface in failover because the client has 2 ISP.[CODE]
View 2 Replies View Relatedhave been tasked with completing a Cisco config update on an ISR.Client is running a Cisco 2911 running IOS version is 15.0(1)M6.They have added a new WAN interface to GigabitEthernet0/2 and are looking to setup a basic failover configuration to augment their current 0/0 Fiber connection.
View 7 Replies View Related
