Cisco WAN :: Does OSPF Work Between VSS L3 MEC And ASA Redundant Interface

Feb 24, 2012

Does OSPF work between a VSS L3 MEC & an ASA Redundant Interface? Both 6509 are in VSS and a L3 MEC is formed to the ASA.Both ASA ports are a part of a L3 Redundant Interface. Please note there is only a single ASA in this topology. [code] Now, the OSPF neighboring does occur and go into the FULL state on this device, however soon enough, the state enters INIT/DROTHER state.But as soon as I disconnect the physical connection 6509(Standby) The OSPF adjacency goes into FULL mode.

View 5 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Firewall :: Pix 525 Configuration - Regular Or Redundant Interface

Feb 14, 2012

I am configuring a pix 525,i just found out how to activate the subinterface on it so that's good,the box has a primary unit and secondary unit, both are connected from G0 to redundant switches,if i do a show failover, it says it's using the serial based lan failover, which is fine by me,however, do i need to create a single, regular interface.. or a redundant interface?,i.e. if i create a regular subinterface, will failover still apply to this interface?,or for failover to work, do i need to create a redundant interface (with a redundant id)? i do not seem to have the option to create a subinterface when adding a redundant interface.

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5540 Redundant Interface Failover

May 8, 2011

I have two ASA 5540s, ver 8.4 configured in Active/Standby failover.I am also using the redundant interface feature for my Inside interface.  Gig0/0 is the active primary and Gig0/1 is standby.
 
I will activate failover monitoring of the Inside interface using the monitor inside command.
 
My question concerns the failover monitoring of the redundant interface.  If the gig0/0 connection were to fail would the Gig0/1 interface become Active, AND simultaneously result in a full device failover?
 
Or, does Gig0/1 of the Inside interface redundant pair simply become active and not change the Inside interface device failover state?  Thus NOT resulting in a device failover.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 Redundant Interface Configuration

Aug 14, 2012

I have configured redundant interface on ASA 5510
 
interface Redundant1
description *** INSIDES NETWORK ***
member-interface Ethernet0/1 (This is a 1000Mbps Port)
member-interface Ethernet0/2 (This one is 100Mbps)
no nameif
no security-level
no ip address
[code].... 

Then... i issue following command and its OK!
 
ASA5510# show interface redundant 1 detail
Interface Redundant1 "", is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is i82546GB rev03, BW 1000 Mbps, DLY 10 usec
Auto-Duplex(Full-duplex), Auto-Speed(1000 Mbps)
Input flow control is unsupported, output flow control is off
[code]...
 
It's transfer correctly then i no shut and back to normal Primary core switch Gi0/30 Interface again, BUT  redundant interface no revert back. I issued this command again BW remain 100Mbps.

ASA5510# show interface redundant 1 detail
Interface Redundant1 "", is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is i82546GB rev03, BW 100 Mbps, DLY 10 usec
Auto-Duplex(Full-duplex), Auto-Speed(100 Mbps)
[ code]....
 
I did manually shut down and no shut the secondary core switch interface Gi0/30 Its changed correctly to 1000Mbps .

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 7600s / Auto Add Of Subinterfaces As No Passive-interface In OSPF?

May 29, 2011

I've been having a problem with my cisco routers (7600s) where sub-interfaces that we create for ldp tunnels are added automatically to the main ospf process as no passive when created. In order, here is how to reproduce the issue:
 
- Configure ospf process as "passive-interface default"

- Configure interfaces that have to be active as "no passive-interface blah"

- ospf works as expected.

- Create new sub- interface somewhere with encapsulation on a certain vlan for xconnect.

- New sub-interface gets added as "no passive-interface" in main ospf process.

- When adding a new port-channel interface, behavior is the same.
 
Is that normal for cisco, should I continue removing sub-interfaces manually every time from the ospf process?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 6503 OSPF On Vlan Interface?

Oct 24, 2011

i'd like to configure OSPF on a Catalyst 6503 IOS 12.2.17.i habe an Gi1/9 with the ip address 192.168.97.30/24 and a VLAN 19 with the IP Address 192.168.19.0/24.I configured OSPF like this
 
router ospf 1
network 192.168.97.0 0.0.0.255 area 10.5.0.0
network 192.168.19.0 0.0.0.255 area 10.5.0.0
 
on the ospf peer is see that the adjaceny is established but i don't get the routes for the 192.168.19.0 network i checked the ip ospf interface vlan 19; i got ospf is not enabled on the interface then i tried to configure

int vlan 19
ip ospf 1 area 10.5.0.0
 
but it does not access ip ospf 1

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Can Not Ping Multi-link Interface Ip After Adding To Ospf On 7206

Jan 15, 2011

I want to configure multilink between two Cisco 7206 routers POS interfacesafter configuring both sides.Router 1interface Multilink5 ip address. [code]. I can see both sides through show cdp, also ospf process goes to FULL stateBut traffic is not flow between interfaces, and i can not even ping router's own ip address.When i delete network statement from ospf process, i can ping router's own interface and both routers can ping each other.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Enabling RIP On PIX 535 / Error / OSPF / RIP Cannot Be Enabled On Failover Interface

Jun 29, 2012

I am getting this error on my PIX 535 with 8.0.4 code. The error is Error : OSPF/RIP cannot be enabled on failover interface, I am getting this error while trying to enable RIP on the firewall. The context is single mode and failover is enabled. When I am disabling the failover the Firewall is accepting the RIP configurations.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 3620 - Cannot Issue Ospf Neighbor Command With NBMA Interface

Jul 27, 2006

I config my E0/0 Interface with "ip ospf network non-broadcast" command, I want this interface to use uni cast to hello neighbor.
 
As I issue "neighbor x.x.x.x" under ospf process, it told me that: OSPF: Neighbor command is allowed only on NBMA and point-to-multipoint networks. I am sure that there are no any typo, and show ip ospf interface e0/0 says it's been an NBMA interface, so what's wrong with this router?
 
IOS information:
(C3620-J1S3-M), Version 12.3(18), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3)

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 7010 OSPF Passive-interface Default Not Showing

Nov 6, 2011

I'm currently working on a plan to migrate our 6500's over to our new 7010's.  At the time of the migration I want to tighten up our OSPF design and configure OSPF for "passive-interface default" then allow only those interfaces that should have OSPF neighbors to send the hellos.  The issue is that the command is not showing up under the OSPF process.  What's even more interesting is that the Nexus 5.x Unicast Routing Configuration Guide shows that the "passive-interface default" command should be an option to enter.
 
I'm currently running version 5.1(4) (though looking to upgrade to 5.2 during my migration testing).  I would rather configure the passive-interface via the routing process versus having to enter it on every interface.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: AGFR01RTR03 / AGFR02RTR03 - Missing Route In OSPF To OSPF Redistribution?

Sep 22, 2011

I have 2 ASBR routers, AGFR01RTR03 and AGFR02RTR03, performing OSPF to OSPF redistribution in both ways for the same ***. They also do summarization for our private addressing scheme. It is all working just fine for that part (neighbors, summarization, redistribution). 
 
AGDC01RTR01 --- AGDC02RTR01 (OSPF 1000 ABRs)
          |                           |
          |                           |
AGFR01RTR03 --- AGFR02RTR03 (OSPF 1000 / 53 ASBRs)
 
Let's focus on AGDC01RTR01 with a specific entry here (IP subnet is fake) :
 
Routing entry for 1.1.1.0/25
  Known via "ospf 1000", distance 110, metric 300, type inter area
  Last update from 10.2.244.76 on GigabitEthernet5/1, 1d03h ago
  Routing Descriptor Blocks:
  * 10.2.244.76, from 10.2.1.249, 1d03h ago, via GigabitEthernet5/1
Route metric is 300, traffic share count is 1

[code]...

View 15 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: VLAN 160 / 162 - Different OSPF Process ID For Interconnect Between 2 OSPF Domain

Mar 14, 2011

Currently the OSPF network consist of 2 segment route via static route.One is AREA 0 and another AREA 10.Both network are seperate entity, only static route to route between 2 networks.But the static route do not provide the dynamically and flexibility, I plan to run routing between 2 networks via VLAN160 and VLAN162.

I still want to manitnace it was 2 different OSPFrouting domain.Can I  run OSPF with differrent OSPF porcess ID?

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Infrastructure :: 3825 Gi0/0 Interface Does Not Work With Modem

Mar 7, 2012

We have a Cisco 3825 router which does not work well with a DSL modem(ISP provided). I have configured the Gi0/0 port of the router to plug into this DSL modem but it does not ping to the ISP gateway. If we do a shut/no shut on the interface then it work fine for about 30 secs. Sometimes even for 1 hr. Then the packets drop and we cannot pass any traffic through this interface.Now, if the ISP connection is terminated on a computer it works fine. It works fine without dropping any packet. I have tried various options like using a straight/cross cable. I have tried to configure the interface negotiation for 100/full, 100/half, auto/auto and almost all the options. I have also tried to interconnect the devices using a L2 device like a HUB. Nothing works.

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 7609 - Connect Ws-6704-10ge To 1 Gig Interface - Does It Work

Apr 18, 2013

i have a Cisco 7609 with ws-6704-10ge, trying to test a cable that is connected to the 10Gig interface , i connected the other end to a 1Gig GBIC interface on WS-X6516-GBIC, now the speed does not match but how to force the 10Gig interface speed to 1Gig, will that ever work? both has LX optics and the cable is SM

View 2 Replies View Related

Can OSPF V2 And OSPF V3 Run In The Same Time

May 15, 2011

I am running IPv4 with OSPFv2 currently. However, I planed to deploy IPv6 in my network. Is it possible to deploy V6 with OSPFv3 without affecting current network traffic in V4?

View 7 Replies View Related

WRT54GL - Default Route In Quagga Doesn't Work If Specified Using Interface Rather Than Address

Apr 4, 2013

I have the following zebra.conf on my router box "A":

hostname nuclear-router
password password
enable password password
interface eth0
ip address 192.168.2.1/24
multicast

[code]...

eth0 is connected to a switch and contains the 192.168.2.0/24 range, and A is connected to my WRT54GL "B" (with IP 192.168.1.1, containing 192.168.1.0/24 range, DHCP serves IPs above .100) wirelessly. B is connected directly to my DSL modem.

The problem is that when I specify the default route using the interface name, I can't connect to the internet from A or any hosts behind it - I'm always hit with a "no route to host" error. Name lookup and pinging any local host (even in a different range) or the DSL modem works fine - it's only when going beyond the modem that things stop working. However, when I use the IP of B as the gateway, it works fine. I noticed that route output on A when the default route was specified using the interface alone had only an asterisk in the gateway column. I was under the impression that these approaches should be identical in practice, so though I got it working, I'd like to know what I'm misunderstanding (and/or misconfiguring). Why didn't the default route work when specified using just the interface?

All routers and the modem too have RIP (version 2) enabled, and of course the password isn't really the word "password".

View 2 Replies View Related

Linksys Wireless Router :: E2500 Web Interface Doesn't Work In Bridge Mode

Jan 10, 2012

I recently bought a Cisco E2500 for work, and after setting the router to Bridge Mode, I am unable to access the router web interface.  I tried both the old IP address (192.168.1.1) and the IP address that I entered when I was configuring Bridge mode, but I couldn't get either to work.  I have always tried resetting the switch to factory defaults and trying again to make sure I didn't type anything wrong, but to no avail.  The wireless and everything works as it should, I just can't get back into the router to change any of my settings.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Redundant Interfaces In ASA 8.0?

Aug 3, 2009

In ASA 8.0,I have following queries related to redundant interfaces
 
a)While configuring redundant interface can the redundant interface again be divided into logical interface like red1.1 , red1.2 ?

b)Is Redundant interface supported in the Multiple context mode

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco :: Redundant Link Between Switch And Router

Nov 30, 2012

Can someone give me a sample router config (Cisco801) for the below scenario. Not familiar with networking.Server with 2 nic, connected to 2 different switches, each switch connected two lan interfaces of Same cisco801 for redundancy.Server must be able to reach gateway IP (in router) in case of either switch failure/server NIC failure.I also have 2 vlans, going to use same link for management vlan and application vlan.

View 11 Replies View Related

Cisco Wireless :: Redundant Port On 5508 WLC

Dec 5, 2010

What is the purpose of Redundant Port that says "future use RJ45" on the Cisco WLC 5508?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Getting Redundant Uplink In 2960 From 3550?

Dec 7, 2010

We need rededunt  uplink in Cisco 2960 from Cisco 3550 , one uplink is primary and one is for backup.As per current scenerio one uplink in Cisco 2960 interface fe0/1 from Cisco 3550 int fe0/1 through OFC cable configuration 2960 int fe0/1 interface fe0/1desciption *** Connect to Cisco 3550 port 1 ***switchport mode accessswitchport access vlan 2spanning-tree guard loop Configuration Cisco 3550 int fe0/1desciption *** Connect to Cisco 2960 port 1 ***switchport mode accessswitchport access vlan 2spanning-tree guard loop We have facing the problem when OFC cable down , so now we are considering anather OFC via anather route to connect same Cisco 2960 Switch in Fe0/2 from Cisco 3550 int fe0/2 so when primary uplink goes down then backup uplink which is connect to Cisco 2960 fe0/2 from Cisco 3550 fe0/2 it's up.what is the command we need configure as per my require in both the Cisco 2960 and 3550 swith in interface and global mode also.

View 10 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 2821 - Getting Redundant Router Setup?

Jun 7, 2012

i am using cisco 2821 router  at the edge  in my  network  where the WAN link is terminated.i want to configure  Redundancy  . So will 2821 support ? If yes  what is the another router .Is it the same series or different for redundant configuration.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco :: Redundant Wlan Controllers (AIR-CT5508-50-K9)

Jun 11, 2012

Q: a client has a network with 60 AP's controlled by a AIR-CT5508-50-K9 (+  L-LIC-CT5508-25A) with a redundant power supply. Can he get full redundancy by purchasing a second controller? If he purchases one, can he bring it into the network? What about the extra license for 25 extra AP's installed on the first controller?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Redundant Transit ISP Design With 7206NPE

May 29, 2013

We are small transit ISP for other downlinks. And currently have such setup 7201 and 7206NPE-G1, as core and edge routers also we have connected to IXP. Downlinks usually BGP connected to one of border router which is terminated via VLAN, thus sub interface. IXP are also connected via VLAN on router.

What I don't like about this is when one borderd goes down downlink will lose connectivty, also recently we start growing and getting more downlinks, so balancing between borders become problem. So my question is, how to make setup less fragile and more redudant.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Replacing Defective Redundant Sup-720

Oct 29, 2011

How to replace a defective redundant sup. I read on several articles that inserting new redundant sup should not be an issue as the active sup will always send its configuation to the standby. We are running SSO on the Sup720. Should I switch it to RPR before I install the redundant sup? I read a case wherein they switched it to RPR from SSO before inserting the new redundant sup. My concern is the IOS mismatch since Cisco doesn't always send the same IOS on RMAs.What I am planning is this.
 
1. Save/Backup configuration
2. Remove the redundant sup on slot 8 (since it is a 6513)
3. Insert the new redundant sup on slot 8.
4. Check if all the configurations were synced from slot 7 to slot 8.
5. Copy the IOS from sup-bootflash to slavesup-bootflash. (if the IOS are not the same)
6. Check show bootvar to see if the boot variables are correct.
7. If bootvar is the same, reload slot 8 to boot the new IOS.
 
Is this a good plan or am I missing something? I am worried with this document if the redundant sup has a different software. If i insert the card in slot8, according to Cisco, it will revert to RPR. If slot 8 boots and it has a different OS, then slot 7 will switch to RPR even if it's active. Would I still be able to access the slavesup-bootflash of slot 8? Is it going to boot 100%? I read that doing a force switchover will cause a flip and RPR would cause the line cards to reinitialize and I don't want that. Well I am not going to do a force switchover since i want slot7 to be active and retain slot 8 as hot.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco :: 3750-X Redundant Power Supply Monitoring

Sep 21, 2012

We have 3750-X's with dual power supplies. When one of them is disconnected the NMS/Netcool is not picking up the trap. What MIB is needed to monitor the power supplies?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 2800 / Route Out Redundant Internet Connection?

Dec 26, 2012

We have a six node MPLS network, all nodes route to our main office for a variety of services (email, core, fire shares, Internet, etc). Therefore, the link to our main office is crucial. In the event that the MPLS link to/from our main office becomes unavailable, we would like to establish a secondary route into our main office via virtual private network. Our main office and two branch offices have redundant broadband internet connectionsWe currently have Cisco 1921 routers as our branch routers and a Cisco 2800 as our “core” router at the main office. We also have two SonicWall TZ-200 series firewalls at the two branch locations and a SonicWall NSA-2400 at our main office. The VPN connection seems to work okay.How would I configure my branch routers to advertise and route traffic out the VPN connection in the event that the MPLS leg to/from our main office is down?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 5520 - Active / Passive ASA With Redundant ISP Connections

Apr 25, 2012

Currently we are using a single connection to our ISP and in the coming months will be moving to a two seperate connections (to same ISP). In our current setup we utilize active/passive ASA's (5520, single context) and would like to utilize that going forward as well, the reason being is our DMZ's all hang off of these ASA's and we have fiber connectivity between our datacenters.Our main datacenter and DR Datacenter are basically one big LAN with fiber between them, so we have our DMZ networks at both locations currently with both terminating in our ASA's. That way if the ASA at our current site fails the DMZ's are still accessible via the secondary firewall at our DR facility.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Wireless :: Setting Up Redundant 5508 Controllers

Mar 10, 2013

I am setting up two 5508 controllers, one in HA mode, and one the primary for the remote sites in question. I plan to have these units service wireless for MPLS conected regional sites (each with their own local subnet). I was planning on using the cabled hosts network in each site for the wifi addressing and was thinking a different addressing for Guest Access, is this common? I'm obviously concerned with guest access clients but don't know enough how their trafiic is segregated from normal wifi traffic.
 
Also, when I stand up the controllers the management interface and ap-manager won't be in the same network as where the hosts or LWAP's will reside (routing access will exist though).

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Configure Backup Redundant Link On 2951 With IOS 15.0?

May 15, 2012

We have 6 sites which are connected through E1 links.All sites connected from HQs.
 
Site A is HQs. 
Sited B, C, D, E, and F are Branches.
 Site A is directly connected with site B, C, D and E.
 Site D is connected with Site F.
 
Now we have another redundant E1 link for site C and Site F.we are using Static Routes.i have configured Qualified-next-hope on Juniper Router but i am unable to configure IP SLA on Site C Cisco 2951 with IOS 15.0 router.is there another solution for my scenario plz share with me for Redundant Link.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 2811 - Redundant ISPs Connection On Router

Aug 8, 2012

I have two ISP need to connect them on my router.
 
The Router that I have is 2811 where it contains two Fa ports only, so I put an access switch between the two ISPs and the Fa0/0 then configured the Interface Fa0/0 with two IPs ISP1 and ISP2 as a secondary.
 
The problem that I faced that when ISP1 become down the another secondary IP (ISP2) stay down and the internal users have no access to the internet.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 6500 VPN To Juniper Redundant Firewall Active

Jul 15, 2012

I am using 6500 with VPN Accelerator on this device.  I have a dozen other VPN connections GRE and IPSEC to routers and ASA and other Juniper Firewalls.
 
They all work perfectly.The error I get is map_db_find_best did not find matching map (Never seen this error be for) [code]I can't put the whole config for security reasons.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Can Two 5505 FWs Made Into Redundant Pair

Aug 26, 2011

Is this this possible to set up two as a redundant pair as you can do with say a pair of 5510s?

View 3 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved