Cisco WAN :: Can Not Ping Multi-link Interface Ip After Adding To Ospf On 7206
Jan 15, 2011
I want to configure multilink between two Cisco 7206 routers POS interfacesafter configuring both sides.Router 1interface Multilink5 ip address. [code]. I can see both sides through show cdp, also ospf process goes to FULL stateBut traffic is not flow between interfaces, and i can not even ping router's own ip address.When i delete network statement from ospf process, i can ping router's own interface and both routers can ping each other.
I have a scenario with a Cisco 6506 and a 7206. The 6506 is running BGP and peers with our data center router. The 7206 is a stub router off the 6506 and is used as an edge router for customer T1 circuits. I want to use OSPF between the routers to exchange connected and static routes. The problem I have is that static BGP null routes on the 6506 are overriding the OSPF routes being received from the 7206. Example: The 6506 is advertising a class C network 192.168.1.0/24 to our data center. The 6506 does not utilize the 192.168.1.0/24 network. It is only used on the 7206 for customer T1 circuits and is carved up into /29 subnets. So the 6506 has a static route: ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 null 0. Today the routing is accomplished with static routes on the 6506 for the 192.168.1.0 networks on the 7206. Using OSPF the 7206 advertises /29 links back to the 6506, but when I withdraw one of the /29 static routes from the 6506, the /24 null route takes precedence over the more specific /29 routes and the traffic is black-holed on the 6506. how can I get the OSPF routes to look preferable to the /24 null route on the 6506?
I have DS3's to two different providers. Each is hosted on its own 7206. The 7206's are connected to each other and both connections to the internet route traffic in and out just fine. Failover between the two is working as well. The issue I have is that one DS3 is used more than the other because it has the best route to most of our remote offices. I wanted to see if theres a way to make one of my routers posess a more attractive route to a given subnet. Of course, in the event of a router or provider failure, I would want the other router to start routing the traffic for that office.
QoS on an MFR interface/subinterfaces. We have a remote site with two bundled T1's terminating on a 2951 router for a total bandwidth of 3072. The circuit is provided by Paetec and the subinterfaces are designated for internet and MPLS traffic respectively. The issue we are facing is with outbound voice quality. It seems that no matter how we apply QoS, either to the main MFR interface or the MFR subinterfaces, voice packets do not seem to be prioritized. We tried FRTS, which slowed the entire link down to a crawl, we tried applying a class map to the main interface as well as a service policy, none of which seemed to affect anything.
class-map match-all VOICE match ip dscp ef class-map match-any SIGNALING match ip dscp af31 match ip dscp cs3 (code)
OK. I think Im going crazy here. Im studying OSPF and I'm working on the DR/BDR election process. I have a topology where three devices (RIDs 1.1.1.1, 2.2.2.2, and 9.9.9.9) are on the same ethernet segment so they need to elect a DR. 9.9.9.9 is a switch and Im using a SVI for the OSPF interface. Van't get the darn thing to show up in the post but here is the topology.URl After OSPF came up, I noticed that router2 was selected as the DR and that switch1 was selected as the BDR. I thought initially that it was a matter of timing and that perhaps router2 just came up first and the slower SVI interface came up second. Shutdown the interfaces, cleared the OSPF process, and set the OSPF router priority on the VLAN interface to 10.
I have two ospf processes running on a single 3570 edge router that has a dedicated transport circuit back to our network core. We are adding an additional "transport" only circuit into a new location that is also apart of the second ospf process backbone which will connect back to our core. There will also be a 3750 for this new circuit termination. Currently we are only redistributing ospf process 2 into ospf process 1 (1 = core backbone).
#router ospf 1 #redistribute ospf 2 subnet
We have no need to have ospf process 1 redistributed into the process 2 tables. That being said, when we add an additional transport ciruit, or path back to our core backbone, will this configuration present any issues with the redistribution process and failover.
i have a cisco router 7206 ,when i create subinterface with ip , the router hangs , and all interfaces are down ,i just remove interface gi0/1 and plug it again, what is the relaiton between subinterfaces and hanging routers> the problem occurred when i configured sub-interface on GI0/2. [code]
I have configured policies to shape the traffic on the interface of cisco 7206 router. Now my managemet wants to configure these policies on time based ie policy should be applicable during specified time period onle. Is it possible? if yes how to configure it?
Does OSPF work between a VSS L3 MEC & an ASA Redundant Interface? Both 6509 are in VSS and a L3 MEC is formed to the ASA.Both ASA ports are a part of a L3 Redundant Interface. Please note there is only a single ASA in this topology. [code] Now, the OSPF neighboring does occur and go into the FULL state on this device, however soon enough, the state enters INIT/DROTHER state.But as soon as I disconnect the physical connection 6509(Standby) The OSPF adjacency goes into FULL mode.
I have a new 3560G to set up a small network for a remote site. I configured the vlan and an SVI as the gateway. The switch is also the DHCP server for the LAN. I configured Gi0/2 as L3 port, connecting to the nearest neighbor. My network runs EIGRP so i advertised the routes into the EIGRP process. The switch forms EIGRP neighbors and learns all routes in the enterprise network. The problems I'm having now are: 1. The switch learns all routes in my enterprise LAN and can ping devices in the enterprise LAN, but I can’t ping any interface on the switch from the enterprise LAN. 2.
We have an OSPF network with four 6500 Distribution Switches. They are fully meshed and see each other as peers and are sharing routes. Off of one pair (Border) there is a setup of 3750G siwtches that go off to another network and they do not run OSPF. Between the Border Dist and the 3750G Switches we run HSRP. The 3750G side uses HSRP GP 192 and the Dist Side uses HSRP 192.There are static routes on the 3750G pointing to the Dist HSRP address to get back to network.Pings fail from the OSPF side to the HSRP address on the 3750G side.If I do a trace from the OSPF side to the HSRP address it hits one border dist switch then the other and fails.If I have static routes on both border dist switches pointing to the HSRP on the 3750side, do we need to change the metric on one dist so that it is preferred over the other or should the router Id take care of that?
I have a Cisco ASA 5505 and I have my internal and external interfaces configured but I currently cannot ping from the inside to an IP Address on the outside. I had this setup and working and I have another set of equirement that I am replacing that is working with my service provider so I know it is a configuration issue. When I ping 4.2.2.2 for example I get:
Destination host unreachable
Do I need to add a static route from my inside interface to my outside interfaces?
I've been having a problem with my cisco routers (7600s) where sub-interfaces that we create for ldp tunnels are added automatically to the main ospf process as no passive when created. In order, here is how to reproduce the issue:
- Configure ospf process as "passive-interface default"
- Configure interfaces that have to be active as "no passive-interface blah"
- ospf works as expected.
- Create new sub- interface somewhere with encapsulation on a certain vlan for xconnect.
- New sub-interface gets added as "no passive-interface" in main ospf process.
- When adding a new port-channel interface, behavior is the same.
Is that normal for cisco, should I continue removing sub-interfaces manually every time from the ospf process?
i'd like to configure OSPF on a Catalyst 6503 IOS 12.2.17.i habe an Gi1/9 with the ip address 192.168.97.30/24 and a VLAN 19 with the IP Address 192.168.19.0/24.I configured OSPF like this
router ospf 1 network 192.168.97.0 0.0.0.255 area 10.5.0.0 network 192.168.19.0 0.0.0.255 area 10.5.0.0
on the ospf peer is see that the adjaceny is established but i don't get the routes for the 192.168.19.0 network i checked the ip ospf interface vlan 19; i got ospf is not enabled on the interface then i tried to configure
I am getting this error on my PIX 535 with 8.0.4 code. The error is Error : OSPF/RIP cannot be enabled on failover interface, I am getting this error while trying to enable RIP on the firewall. The context is single mode and failover is enabled. When I am disabling the failover the Firewall is accepting the RIP configurations.
I config my E0/0 Interface with "ip ospf network non-broadcast" command, I want this interface to use uni cast to hello neighbor.
As I issue "neighbor x.x.x.x" under ospf process, it told me that: OSPF: Neighbor command is allowed only on NBMA and point-to-multipoint networks. I am sure that there are no any typo, and show ip ospf interface e0/0 says it's been an NBMA interface, so what's wrong with this router?
IOS information: (C3620-J1S3-M), Version 12.3(18), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3)
I am having a Cisco 7406 VXR router. I want to know what is the max. MPLS link capacity that can be terminated on the link? We are planning to upgrade the MPLS link to 450 Mb..so was just wondering whether 7206 will support or not..
I'm currently working on a plan to migrate our 6500's over to our new 7010's. At the time of the migration I want to tighten up our OSPF design and configure OSPF for "passive-interface default" then allow only those interfaces that should have OSPF neighbors to send the hellos. The issue is that the command is not showing up under the OSPF process. What's even more interesting is that the Nexus 5.x Unicast Routing Configuration Guide shows that the "passive-interface default" command should be an option to enter.
I'm currently running version 5.1(4) (though looking to upgrade to 5.2 during my migration testing). I would rather configure the passive-interface via the routing process versus having to enter it on every interface.
We have a router (7206) which connected to client device in /30 IP segment, but this device is a switch which connected to many more devices. Doing packet capture on our router interface unravel many ARP requests which comes from the client switch.Is there any feature or command which we can stop this?
I have E1 interface that supports 2Mbps and i need to connect Point to Point , my question is can i add 2 more E1 interface on my cisco router and configure it using channels on that link so i can increase my bandwidth up to 6Mbps.
I have configured my two vdsl link with ppp multilink but i am not getting the desired bandwidth. Here is my configuration is this okay or i need something more in the configuration. My router is 2921 what is the maximum WAN throughput of 2921? [code]
I'm trying to find out what platforms support Multilink PPP with Link Fragmentation and Interleaving over a single link, when that single link is PPPoE. In searching the documentation, the best information I can find is that it seems to be supported in one direction on the ASR1000 url...Many platforms appear to support PPPoE and also MLPPP w/LFI, but it's not clear that both features are supported on the same link.
The application is a radio that has an Ethernet interface on its terrestrial link, and acts as an Ethernet bridge. Would like to use Multilink PPPoE with LFI in order to provide LFI in order to run VoIP over lower speed links (e.g 256kb). For what it's worth, the radio also supports RFC 5578 PPPoE Extensions for Credit Flow and Link Metrics. It was fairly easy to find what platforms support RFC 5578. But RFC 5578 would be used to support variation in the capacity of the link. If the link speed is fixed, RFC 5578 is not needed. I was trying to find if the set of platforms supported increase if the need for RFC 5578 is taken off the table.
In particular, I'd be interested in the whether the ASR 9000 series supports MLPPP bundles with LFI when the links are PPPoE.
Recently upgraded to 1.33NA. I keep getting this message when changing certain settings (such as enabling a guest zone). It's essentially locking me out of changing the system!As far as I know - the DIR-655 DOESN'T have WDS - this was removed a number of firmware revisions ago. I cannot find a setting for this anywhere. There are a few mentions of this on this forum and the web, but nothing concrete as to why it's happening or a valid solution.[url]...
I have 2 ASBR routers, AGFR01RTR03 and AGFR02RTR03, performing OSPF to OSPF redistribution in both ways for the same ***. They also do summarization for our private addressing scheme. It is all working just fine for that part (neighbors, summarization, redistribution).
Let's focus on AGDC01RTR01 with a specific entry here (IP subnet is fake) :
Routing entry for 1.1.1.0/25 Known via "ospf 1000", distance 110, metric 300, type inter area Last update from 10.2.244.76 on GigabitEthernet5/1, 1d03h ago Routing Descriptor Blocks: * 10.2.244.76, from 10.2.1.249, 1d03h ago, via GigabitEthernet5/1 Route metric is 300, traffic share count is 1
I have a frustrating issue with a dynamic VPN head end running IOS 15.2 on 2900's. I have existing keyrings, and isakmp profiles (both main and agressive) running. When I add in a new peer, by adding in a keyring prechared statement and a match identity in the isakmp profile, phase 1 biulds but phase 2 only gets right to the end and the Cisco side resets the connection because it did not get back a response to it's Phase 2 proposal.I have tried a number of soft clear commands to remedy this (I do have 16 other production tunnels I do not want to take down) and no avail. This is very consistent. We had this happen last week in the same manner, and the TAC finally said I must reboot the system. So I removed the cmap from the interface, and reapplied it (using notepad to do it all at once). All the tunnels dropped, and after a few manual restarts on the far end for thos etunnels that are tempermental, all tunnels came back up, including my new add.I have a pair of 3900's running 15.1 code in the US that terminate the same tunnels, and I can add and remove PEERS all day long without resetting anything. Could there be a more polite way of resetting what ever it is that removing the CMAP does to allow my new peer to get the full treatment here?
Currently the OSPF network consist of 2 segment route via static route.One is AREA 0 and another AREA 10.Both network are seperate entity, only static route to route between 2 networks.But the static route do not provide the dynamically and flexibility, I plan to run routing between 2 networks via VLAN160 and VLAN162.
I still want to manitnace it was 2 different OSPFrouting domain.Can I run OSPF with differrent OSPF porcess ID?
I have a site which has been successfully running a multilink bundle of four T1 lines for about 6 months. The remote location is a C3825 router and the central location router is a C7206. I have access to both. A few weeks ago the multilink circuit started flapping and I was able to identify one of the four T1 lines as the culprit. When I shut down the interface for that one T1 line, the multilink circuit stops bouncing. As soon as I issue a "no shut" command on that fourth T1 interface, the multilink circuit starts flapping, ping commands start to time out and I have to shut it down again. The Telco has sent a technician to both locations and reported all tests run clean. Internal wiring from the NIU to the router has also tested fine. I've tried to move the T1 lines to different ports on both routers and the problem persists. [code]
we are moving to different providers. We currently have multiple sites that have MLP bundles going to our current provider. We are trying to limit our network disruptions by creating a new MLP bundle group and connect it to the new provider, but are having no luck. In a GNS3 lab I have setup I am able to keep my existing MLP bundle up/up over the current provider network. When I attempt to bring up a new MLP group to the other provider my MLP does not come up and keeps going up/up then down/down and shows inactive. Is it possible to have one MLP group go to current vendor router, then create another MLP group and go to the other router?
how would u link(or in other word route) different OSPF process ID? i have OSPF 1 and OSPF 2 and i want them to see each others networks...how can i accomplish this ?
I have an AS-external route being redistributed into OSPF from a static route on one of my routers. I recently changed the static route from a /24 to a /26 and all of a sudden the link ID of the segment in the OSPF database went from the network address to the broadcast address: Code:
Region : India Model : TL-WR740N Hardware Version : Not Clear ISP : BSNL BB
I have a BSNL BB connection. When I use the connection directly, without adding TP Link router, all the websites open flawlessly. Once when I connect the wireless router, certain websites for example Yahoomail, pepperfry.com, yepme.com don't open at all. These are just examples, but I'm unable to access many sites which is a bit annoying. But sites such as gmail, youtube, facebook open clean, there are no issues. I didn't make any configuration changes too. I tried it more than three or four times, but there is a restricted access only.
Do the cisco 4503 switches support virtual clustering feature ? I have a requirement where switch ports on two different 4503 switches need to combined in the same Link aggregation group . This is needed because the firewall notes say that the aggregated interfaces need to be conected to a single switch and combined in the same LAG . So according to the diagram below , the interfaces marked RED need to be in the same LAG in the switches , same for the interfaces marked BLUE . I have done the same setup using Juniper switches where it uses VIRTUAL CLUSTERING to group the different switch ports in the same LAG.
