Cisco WAN :: 1841 Multi-link PPP On WIC-1T And HWIC-1T
Feb 19, 2012is there any known issue in configuring multilink ppp using an old WIC-1T and a newer HWIC-1T on the same Cisco 1841 router ?
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Cisco WAN :: 1841 With 3G HWIC - Backup WAN Connection?
Jul 3, 2011I'm trying to backup my primary WAN with secondary backup connection - 3G WAN through Cellular 0/0/0.Point is that I need to track some external IP address on my primary interface, for examle 8.8.8.8. If it is not reacheable, then router brings up backup connection - 3G. This can be done by using dialer-watcher.Simple.But unfortunately my primary WAN interface is an FastEthernet, which is the coonected to a switch, switch to WAN . There is no dialer-watch commands on it. Thats sad .
One more time :
WAN -> SWITCH -> ROUTER(WITH 3G HWIC and Fa 0/0 connected to switch).
Cisco WAN :: Configuring HWIC To ADSL In 1841
May 10, 2011I have a CISCO 1841 with a HWIC interface to my ISP. I want to make a ADSL connection and my current running-file is: [code] The problem I have is that the ISP connection is established but then goes down.
View 1 Replies View RelatedAdding HWIC To Slot 1 Of Cisco 1841?
Jan 2, 2012I'm trying to learn a little about Cisco router setup, since I'm fairly well versed in configuration. I have an 1841 w/ K9 that I'd like to set up as a WAN Router to hot swap if one of ours goes down. I installed a VWIC2-1MFT-T1/E1 MultiFlex card in Slot 1 of the router.
Currently, if I run a "show diag", the VWIC2-1MFT-T1/E1 shows up in Slot 1 but in the configuration I can't see it or configure it. Am I missing an enable or something? I thought I had to declare card type but I can only do that on the existing card, the router doesn't seem to recognize that the card is there in any place other than "show diag".
Cisco WAN :: 1841 - VPN Options With 3G HWIC Card
Aug 19, 2012I've been given an 1841 with a 3G HWIC card installed to test with. I need to set up some sort of VPN to our ASA, the problem is though these 3G cards get a random public IP, so what options do I have to create a VPN tunnel from this router to the ASA without the 1841 getting a static public IP?
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco Wireless :: 1841 - Update Firmware For HWIC 3G-GSM?
Sep 30, 2010I am trying tu update the firnmware of a HWIC 3G-GSM within an 1841. What is the correct firmware?
I have tried
K2_0_7_35 and K1_0_2_18 from [URL]
[Code]......
Cisco Switching/Routing :: IOS Support For HWIC-1ADSL On 1841?
May 14, 2008I just recently (and very expensively) purchased a HWIC-1ADSL for my 1841 router.
Unfortunately, it doesn't display in the configuration - nor any lights appear on it for power/link.
My first guess is I need to upgrade my IOS. The current version on my 1841 is 12.4(17). Which appears to be pretty current.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 1841 / HWIC-AP-AG-A Not Providing IP Address To Clients
Dec 5, 2012I have not yet completed my CCNA, however I have managed to configure a 1841 router with 1 x HWIC-ADSL1 and it also has 1 x HWIC-AG-AP-A which is the only part I am unable to get working.
The Wi-Fi (Dot11Radio) config has enabled me to see the SSID from wireless devices, but they never get an IP address. I need them to get the same IP range as the DHCP service I have in there 203.35.10.xxx, there is no option for "IP ADDRESS DHCP" only "IP ADDRESS POOL LAN" Lan is of course my DHCP pool name. however I cannot have the same DHCP pool on both Dot11Radio interfaces.
I know I'm missing one very simple command, but as I've never worked with Radio on Cisco equipment, I am unsure how to fix it.
Then once I get that worked out, I need changing the access from OPEN to WPA or WPA2, etc..
IOS Software on Router is C1841-ADVSECURITYK9-M - Version 12.4(9) T
I can upgrade to a better version of software if needed, I only have a 32mb Flash and 128Mb Ram.
The current Radio Config is:
!
interface Dot11Radio0/1/0
no ip address
no ip redirects
[Code]....
Cisco WAN :: 1841 / High Speed WAN Interface Card (HWIC) Supported Features?
Jun 5, 2011my office is looking in ordering a HWIC-1FE to supply our cisco 1841 router with a second ISP connection. i wanted to find out if this card support load balancing and fail over? not sure if fail over is the right terminology so ill explain, i need it so that if one ISP connection goes down (as it does often) it fails over to the second ISP.
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco WAN :: 1841 Router - HWIC Interface Card - Cannot See Interface In Configuration File
May 9, 2012i have a 1841 cisco router and i recently purchased a 1 port HWIC wan interface card. My problem is that I cannot see the interface in my config file. Is there something i am missing?
View 8 Replies View RelatedCisco WAN :: 2921 PPP Multi-link Configuration
Feb 6, 2013I have configured my two vdsl link with ppp multilink but i am not getting the desired bandwidth. Here is my configuration is this okay or i need something more in the configuration. My router is 2921 what is the maximum WAN throughput of 2921? [code]
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco WAN :: ASR1000 Multi-link PPPoE With LFI
Mar 26, 2013I'm trying to find out what platforms support Multilink PPP with Link Fragmentation and Interleaving over a single link, when that single link is PPPoE. In searching the documentation, the best information I can find is that it seems to be supported in one direction on the ASR1000 url...Many platforms appear to support PPPoE and also MLPPP w/LFI, but it's not clear that both features are supported on the same link.
The application is a radio that has an Ethernet interface on its terrestrial link, and acts as an Ethernet bridge. Would like to use Multilink PPPoE with LFI in order to provide LFI in order to run VoIP over lower speed links (e.g 256kb). For what it's worth, the radio also supports RFC 5578 PPPoE Extensions for Credit Flow and Link Metrics. It was fairly easy to find what platforms support RFC 5578. But RFC 5578 would be used to support variation in the capacity of the link. If the link speed is fixed, RFC 5578 is not needed. I was trying to find if the set of platforms supported increase if the need for RFC 5578 is taken off the table.
In particular, I'd be interested in the whether the ASR 9000 series supports MLPPP bundles with LFI when the links are PPPoE.
D-Link DIR-655 :: Cannot Use Multi-cast MAC Address In WDS
Mar 26, 2010Recently upgraded to 1.33NA. I keep getting this message when changing certain settings (such as enabling a guest zone). It's essentially locking me out of changing the system!As far as I know - the DIR-655 DOESN'T have WDS - this was removed a number of firmware revisions ago. I cannot find a setting for this anywhere. There are a few mentions of this on this forum and the web, but nothing concrete as to why it's happening or a valid solution.[url]...
View 6 Replies View RelatedCisco WAN :: C7206 Multi-link Four T1 Circuits / 4th T1 Won't Bundle
Feb 1, 2011I have a site which has been successfully running a multilink bundle of four T1 lines for about 6 months. The remote location is a C3825 router and the central location router is a C7206. I have access to both. A few weeks ago the multilink circuit started flapping and I was able to identify one of the four T1 lines as the culprit. When I shut down the interface for that one T1 line, the multilink circuit stops bouncing. As soon as I issue a "no shut" command on that fourth T1 interface, the multilink circuit starts flapping, ping commands start to time out and I have to shut it down again. The Telco has sent a technician to both locations and reported all tests run clean. Internal wiring from the NIU to the router has also tested fine. I've tried to move the T1 lines to different ports on both routers and the problem persists. [code]
View 9 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: GNS3 Multi-link Bundles To Different Routers
Apr 30, 2012we are moving to different providers. We currently have multiple sites that have MLP bundles going to our current provider. We are trying to limit our network disruptions by creating a new MLP bundle group and connect it to the new provider, but are having no luck. In a GNS3 lab I have setup I am able to keep my existing MLP bundle up/up over the current provider network. When I attempt to bring up a new MLP group to the other provider my MLP does not come up and keeps going up/up then down/down and shows inactive. Is it possible to have one MLP group go to current vendor router, then create another MLP group and go to the other router?
View 6 Replies View RelatedCisco WAN :: Can Not Ping Multi-link Interface Ip After Adding To Ospf On 7206
Jan 15, 2011I want to configure multilink between two Cisco 7206 routers POS interfacesafter configuring both sides.Router 1interface Multilink5 ip address. [code]. I can see both sides through show cdp, also ospf process goes to FULL stateBut traffic is not flow between interfaces, and i can not even ping router's own ip address.When i delete network statement from ospf process, i can ping router's own interface and both routers can ping each other.
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco WAN :: 2811 WAN Link Terminated In HWIC-4ESW
Jun 3, 2013I have a module of HWIC-4ESW installed into Cisco 2811 router where 3 WAN link is terminited. Suddently WAN links stopped working from last night. I have performed shutdown and no shutdown in the interface but still the the WAN link was not working. After performing a reboot the WAN link started working. No error logs were generated while the WAN link was down.
View 4 Replies View RelatedCisco WAN :: 2951 - QoS For Voice On Multi-Link Frame Relay Interface / Subinterface
Jan 10, 2012QoS on an MFR interface/subinterfaces. We have a remote site with two bundled T1's terminating on a 2951 router for a total bandwidth of 3072. The circuit is provided by Paetec and the subinterfaces are designated for internet and MPLS traffic respectively. The issue we are facing is with outbound voice quality. It seems that no matter how we apply QoS, either to the main MFR interface or the MFR subinterfaces, voice packets do not seem to be prioritized. We tried FRTS, which slowed the entire link down to a crawl, we tried applying a class map to the main interface as well as a service policy, none of which seemed to affect anything.
class-map match-all VOICE
match ip dscp ef
class-map match-any SIGNALING
match ip dscp af31
match ip dscp cs3 (code)
Cisco WAN :: HWIC 3G Drop Internet Traffic Thorough Backup Link
Jun 12, 2012My requirment is to drop the Internet traffic once the Cisco HWIC 3G backup link will become active(attached) .Because I should allow only Business Critical Data allow through that and others should drop. Here are the config I used. In here I used a standard access list to generate intersting traffic which allow all the traffic traverse through the backup link.Can I drop the packets to the proxy (192.168.1.100) using this access list and allow other traffic.access-list 1 deny 192.168.1.100access-list 1 permit anydialer-list 1 protocol ip list 1.Is this the proper way I should follow ? Is there any other good method to achieve my requirement ? [code]
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Virtual Clustering / Split Multi-link Trunking On 4503
Mar 30, 2012Do the cisco 4503 switches support virtual clustering feature ? I have a requirement where switch ports on two different 4503 switches need to combined in the same Link aggregation group . This is needed because the firewall notes say that the aggregated interfaces need to be conected to a single switch and combined in the same LAG . So according to the diagram below , the interfaces marked RED need to be in the same LAG in the switches , same for the interfaces marked BLUE . I have done the same setup using Juniper switches where it uses VIRTUAL CLUSTERING to group the different switch ports in the same LAG.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco WAN :: Difference Between HWIC-1ADSL-M And HWIC-1ADSL?
Jun 12, 2013What is the difference between HWIC-1ADSL-M and HWIC-1ADSL without the "-M"?Can either of the above ADSL cards be used in Cisco 3845 router? We are using HWIC-1ADSL-M in our Cisco 3845 routers everywhere?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco WAN :: Does 1841 Supports 10MB ILL Link
Feb 13, 2011We have a 10 MB Internet Link coming from our ISP through there MUX.The link is connected to our Router 1841.Cisco IOS Software, 1841 Software (C1841-IPBASE-M), Version 12.4(3i), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)From past few weeks we are facing link speed issues. It gives not more then 1-2 MB.The ISP is telling there is no Problem in there network. We have kept Default Routing pointing towards there IP.We want to know whether our router will support 10MB Internet Link or Not.
View 9 Replies View RelatedCisco VPN :: Build 1841 Ipsec On A DSL Link?
May 28, 2012I am now having trouble to buil a vpn ipsec on an adsl link, my architecture is as follow:
[code]...
whith this output, debbuging seems very difficult. see attached my configuration on router 1841
Cisco WAN :: 1841 - Monitor WAN Link Performance
Apr 2, 2012It is required to monitor newly placed WAN link performance . How can I configure my cisco 1841 router to obtain the following information.
1) Errors
2) Jitter
Cisco WAN :: 1841 Floating Static Routes Configured If DSL Link Goes Down
Sep 19, 2011I am having some trouble configuring dual NAT on a Cisco 1841.
The 1841 has three interfaces.
Fa0/0 - LAN
Fa0/1- Different private network
Fa0/1/0 - Connection to DSL modem
NAT overloading is configured on Fa0/1 and we have traffic that must be router there. We would like to have all internet access go through the DSL modem. Currently internet access is obtained through fa0/1 but is not ideal. I have floating static routes configured if the DSL link goes down. (Which is currently unplugged) I do not have physical access to the router at this moment. We would like to keep the config a simple as possible. It seems like route-maps may be one of our only options.
Cisco WAN :: Terminate New 10M Link Via Ethernet Interface On 1841 Router?
Dec 19, 2010We want to terminate new 10M link via Ethernet interface on Cisco 1841 router. We have free Gig port on the router. We also have HWIC-FE module inserted in the router. However, our implementation team said that Cisco 1841 doesn't support 10M link. It is not designed to cater to such high Bandwidth.
View 14 Replies View RelatedMulti Brands Ips In One PC?
Mar 21, 2012Multi brands ips in one PC?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco WAN :: 1841 E1 To V.35 Point To Point Link
May 20, 2013I am getting error message in my cisco 1841.I am using E1 card and next end is terminated to modem(e1 to V.35) and its connected to router serial port.
i have configured at both end but status in not comming up in E1 interface.Also geeting this message %CONTROLLER-2-FIRMWARE: Controller E1 0/0/0, firmware is not running".
Cisco WAN :: Multi-cast Within Vrf On 7200's
Dec 15, 2010We have network consisting of approx. 8 7200's running LNS/MPLS/BGP and we provide predominantly private networks to clients(Majority of client networks are a mix of Ethernet tails and DSL).We have received a request from one client to support multicast - Having never implemented multicast, have a few questions:
1. Is is supported/possible to provide multicast within a vrf on 7200's?(From initial investigations, it appears to be)
2. Is it possible to only enable mutilcast in a vrf(i.e. not globally)?
3. Any recommended guides/best pratices?(Googling has revealed nothing really that is similiar to what we want to do)4. What are the potential ramifications?(Resource overhead, Security implications, anything else?)
Cisco :: Building A Multi Site Network?
Jan 18, 2013I wish to build a test rig in my office that will act as 2 separate geographic locations with a router at each location connecting to a make believe MPLS kind of network. I then wish for these sites to communicate with each other but obviously be on separate IP ranges .I know each site would have a router and I assume that there ideally should be 2 corresponding (provider) routers on the MPLS network. What I do not know is how the the routers at each site should connect physically to its partner router at the MPLS and also how the two MPLS routers would connect together. For example, if I wanted to later scale up to have 4 geographical sites how would the 4 MPLS routers connect together (using a switch?)?
View 5 Replies View RelatedCisco :: OSPF Multi Access Network
Feb 10, 2013OK. I think Im going crazy here. Im studying OSPF and I'm working on the DR/BDR election process. I have a topology where three devices (RIDs 1.1.1.1, 2.2.2.2, and 9.9.9.9) are on the same ethernet segment so they need to elect a DR. 9.9.9.9 is a switch and Im using a SVI for the OSPF interface. Van't get the darn thing to show up in the post but here is the topology.URl After OSPF came up, I noticed that router2 was selected as the DR and that switch1 was selected as the BDR. I thought initially that it was a matter of timing and that perhaps router2 just came up first and the slower SVI interface came up second. Shutdown the interfaces, cleared the OSPF process, and set the OSPF router priority on the VLAN interface to 10.
View 11 Replies View RelatedCisco :: Possible To Install LMS 4.2 In Multi Server Mode
Mar 15, 2012Is it possible to install LMS 4.2 in multiserver mode but with possibility to select installed components/applications? I'm talking about Solaris version. I can't see such an option. It will install all the components on every server which I don't want to. We have LMS 3.2 working in such setup: one server with most major components, other running just DFM and third one with only HUM installed.
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco WAN :: 7200 - BGP Multi Ingress / Egress QoS
Nov 4, 2012I have a question that so far I haven't been able to find a suitable answer for. This is focused from an ISP perspective. So suppose I have the following scenario:
I have a BGP transit area. On each edge of the my network I have a e BGP connection to the same client for redundancy. This client has his own ASN, iBGP and prefixes. I'm receiving the same NLRI from the client through both sides. Let's assume he's advertzing the prefix 10.10.0.0/16 through both ends. I'm receiving it with no problems and I'm passing it along to the next providers with whom I also have multiple ingress and egress points.
Something like this:
PROVIDER A PROVIDER A
| |
eBGP eBGP
| |
CLIENT A (ASN65100) --- eBGP --- MYROUTERA(ASN65200) ----- iBGP --- MYROUTERB(ASN65200) --- eBGP --- CLIENT A(ASN65100)
| |
eBGP eBGP
| |
PROVIDER B PROVIDER B
Let's say my client pays for a 10Mb. Both links are configured to 10Mb so that each can handle the load in case the other one fails and both are always active. So my question is:
How can I shaped or police the client's traffic across multiple points of entry on different routers so that it won't go beyond the 10Mb. The same scenario applies on how can I limit traffic coming from the providers A, and B destined to the client's prefix: 10.10.0.0/16.
I don't mean using MED, local-pref, weight. Sure I can funnel all the traffic through one single point, but consider that I'm also trying to move away from basic routing and more into PfR, which mean that I have more granular control of the flows. Perhaps there is a PfR service-policy or something that can work.
For this scenario I'm using 7200 as my routers. If there is a solution that assumes any other model don't hesitate to post it. TLDR; How can I police or shape across multi interfaces on different routers?