have been tasked with completing a Cisco config update on an ISR.Client is running a Cisco 2911 running IOS version is 15.0(1)M6.They have added a new WAN interface to GigabitEthernet0/2 and are looking to setup a basic failover configuration to augment their current 0/0 Fiber connection.
View 7 RepliesI have a Cisco ASA 5505 in our office. We are currently using Interface 0 for outside and 1 for inside. We only have 1 Vlan in our environment. We have two three switches behind the firewall. Today the uplink to Interface 1, to the firewall, on the switch went bad. I want to setup a second inside interface on the firewall and configure it as failover incase this happens again. I want to attach it to the other switch. Can I do this? If so, what do I need to do? would it only be a passive/standby interface?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI thing that i find some bug in the newest IOS 15.1.4M.
The case is falow:
I start to configure failover for the costomer - make default route, make the default path but i cant find the comand IP SLA monitor. Is some meet this problem with this IOS or just Cisco make some chenge in the CLI commands?
Tomorrow i will try with IOS version 15.1.1T.
I've got a ASA 5550 firewall interface failover issue. (File attached).
when I shut down the inside interface Gi 1/1 of the left firewall(Active firewall), It failed to failover. but when I shut down the Gi 1/12 of the Core 1 switch, The firewall failover very well.
I followed this guide but I was not able to failover. [URL]
how can I configure so that when the Gi 1/1 or Gi 1/0 interface goes down, it can failover ? Code...
I need to configure two links (active and failover) on router 2911. Do I need DATA LICENSE to configure this with static router and route-map?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI need a interface v.35 on 2911 router, but it does not have WIC slot, it has EHWIC. Could some one told me if there are a card with V.35 interface that I can install in this model of router?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI need to configure one interface in failover because the client has 2 ISP.[CODE]
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe bought a cisoc 2911 Router with an EHWIC-VA-DSL-A Card. I did the Dialer Setup without any problem but if i set the ATM interface with the commands: [code]The Router crashes after some seconds. I didn't connceted the phone line to the DSL card. [code]
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have both a Easy VPN server and a site-to-site VPN on the same outside interface of a 2911 router.
Currently, a Easy VPN client has no route int the router then out the site-to-site VPN to the remote site.
How can I create this route?
[code]...
having some issues with a configuration using a Dialer interface. The interface comes up and the VPN tunnel comes up, but cannot access any network resources or the Internet.
The things that concern me most are my access lists as I have the static IP address that we are assigned via PPPOE - the IP never changes, but not sure if I can define it in the ACL or if I should be using an ANY tag.
Note: I've changed some IPs and username for security reasons.
!version 15.0service tcp-keepalives-inservice tcp-keepalives-outservice timestamps debug datetime msecservice timestamps log datetime msecservice password-encryptionservice sequence-numbers!hostname C2911-OTO01!boot-start-
[Code].....
During WAN troubleshooting, I did a "clear interface ser0/0/0" on a branch router. It has two WAN links. I lost ssh/telnet connectivity but both WAN links were still replying to pings. We did a manual power off of the router to regain connectivity.Is there a known issue with this command on this IOS version? We're using Cisco 2911 platform with IOS 15.1-1.T2 version.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am configuring my first 2911 using a SFP card but I dont know the interface name for this module.
show inv shows the card..
What is the interface number for this card or if it needs some config before it will recognize the interface?
We have a 2911 Router running 15.0(1)M4. G 0/0 is our LAN interface, and it has three subinterfacesG0/0.1 is our data LAN, and the gateway for our Windows machines. This is the interface this question concerns.G0/0.23 is a separate LAN for various equipmentG0/0.192 is another LAN for equipmentG 0/1 is connected to the internet, and has a public address.S 0/0/0 is a T1 PPP, connected to our core data centerS 0/1/0 is a backup T1 PPP, again, connected to our core data center.There are three static routes entered:ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.12.1.1 100 This is the first PPPip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.13.1.1 200 This is the secondary PPPip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 255 It currently has a cost of 255 while i figure this one out. xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx represents the cable company gateway, which I can ping properly. I've also used "gigabitethernet 0/1" in place of the next hop ip with the same results. The public interface is properly connected, and can ping it's next hop (the cable company gateway). When I change the static route for gigabitethernet 0/1 to a cost of "0", the router can properly ping DNS names, such as google.com through the public interface.
However, devices on the data LAN cannot reach any public addresses except for the router's public interface, let alone DNS names (I am using 8.8.8.8 as my test IP). If I revert the cost back to 255, making the PPP the gateway of last resort, these devices can again connect. (they travel through the PPP to our Data center's internet)
This confuses me. If our server, on the same LAN as the router can ping the public interface (it's definitley not leaving the 2911, as latency is less than 1ms), and the router itself can ping outside addresses, what is preventing the router's public interface from passing traffic to the internet from any source other than itself? I have attached our running config in the hopes that there is something obvious I'm missing (the public ip addresses have been changed so they are not exposed). I simply want clients on our 10.23.0.0 LAN to get to the internet via the public interface of the local router, and still connect to corporate resources using the PPP links. MAS_2911#sho run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 5666 bytes
!
! Last configuration change at 01:47:50 eastern Sat Sep 24 2011 by redacted
[Code].....
I am looking to change my Failover Int IPs on my PIX 515E Bundle, Cisco PIX Firewall Version 6.3(5)123 with the least impact on the network.
For example:
interface ethernet5 "state"
IP address 172.18.0.245, subnet mask 255.255.255.252
ip address state 172.18.0.245 255.255.255.252
failover ip address state 172.18.0.246
I want to change these lines to .....
interface ethernet5 "state"
IP address 172.18.0.185, subnet mask 255.255.255.252
ip address state 172.18.0.185 255.255.255.252
failover ip address state 172.18.0.186
I have two ASA 5540s, ver 8.4 configured in Active/Standby failover.I am also using the redundant interface feature for my Inside interface. Gig0/0 is the active primary and Gig0/1 is standby.
I will activate failover monitoring of the Inside interface using the monitor inside command.
My question concerns the failover monitoring of the redundant interface. If the gig0/0 connection were to fail would the Gig0/1 interface become Active, AND simultaneously result in a full device failover?
Or, does Gig0/1 of the Inside interface redundant pair simply become active and not change the Inside interface device failover state? Thus NOT resulting in a device failover.
I am trying to configure two ASA-5505 as a failover pair. Software 8.2.5 and ASDM 6.4.5.206 Using the wizard i get to step3 .. then nothing happens. Trying direct in asdm but the only interface i can choose is "--None Unnamed-"
View 1 Replies View RelatedFrom ASA 5520 we tested the interface failover it not working even the interface are getting monitor .
primary is active.
Manually we shut the outside interface of the primary device configuration is getting reflecting in secondary as outside interface shut. Interface failover not happen.
ii All the interface are getting monitor when we gave command sh failover. even though when we shut outside interface failove not happening.
how to do the interface failover in ASA 8.4 version.
Need to confirm about 2911 isr, what interface numbers are given to a 9esw when placed in the far left hwic slots (hwic slot 2+3).
I need to build some configs but its going to be a few more weeks before the kit arrives.
I have a 2911 router connected to two different ISP. Is it posible to route traffic based on what interface the traffic came first?Lets say I have the deault route to use interface gig0/0(ISP1), but a certain ip packet reach the router by interface gig0/1(ISP2). Is there any way (if possible without using source NAT) that I could route traffic back to that ip address using interface gig0/1. The source Ip addresses are not fixed, so I can not use Policy Based Routing.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have configured Priority Queueing in my Cisco 2911 Router. I have set queue list high, medium, normal and Low. But when I put show interface gi0/2, it is showing the queueing strategy is priority queueing but it is not showing the (size/max/drops) values.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI need to configure a Cisco 2911. I need to give an interface in this module (VWIC3 - 4MFT-T1/E1) an IP address. My question is, how to assign an IP to an interface in this module.
My purpose is to get connectivity via T1 line to another router.
I have two cisco routers (Cisco 2911 and 871) that I'm trying to establish a L2L VPN with. Each have a VPN configured to our cooperate office that is up and working. I'm now trying to establish a site to site VPN from both remote offices. I have my crypto maps, NoNats, and interesting traffic set up however, I do not even see phase one come up.
I've attached each config. Most of my site to site experience is on PIX's and ASA so I'm curious if there is something else I need to do on my outside interface to allow multiple VPN's?
Do I correctly understand that when two ASA 5510 are in fail over pair, the switchover from primary to secondary if one interface of primary goes down shall happen ONLY if failover link is up? So when the fail over link is down and one interface on primary got down also, interface tests between the two ASAs still are being done , but secondary SHALL NEVER try to become active.
In this case why to make tests on data interfaces ? What is the reason to make them? If the knowledge of that some interfaces of primary became down comes through failover link - no need to make additional interface tests - primary will tell about the failure to secondary. If so should run no monitor-interface if name command to dis load devices and network by foolish tests?
Is it possible to have this setup on RV016?
WAN1: VOIP traffic (either by port or IP) + failover for WAN 2 WAN2: all other traffic + failover for WAN1 WAN3: failover for WAN1 & WAN2 with connection on demand
I have configured multicast (ip pim dense-mode) on two 2911 routers that are connected by a Multilink (3Mbps) Wan connection.The configuration work fine for awhile and sometimes all day but at some point one of the Multilink interfaces stop passing multicast traffic.I perform a sh multilink 1 on the interfaces and one interfaces show the multicast packets incrementing and the other does not, it just stops.The only fix for this is to hard reboot both routers and the multicast traffic begins to flow once again.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have been having following situation on my WAN facing interface on Cisco2911 where the same number of broadcast, multicast and unknown protocol drops is happening. Not sure but some applications are struggling to run over on the WAN.
[code]....
i will going to buy a router 2911 but i want know if support a interface ADSL modulo like backup in case that my primary link WAN Ethernet down and up the adsl link with a module HWIC ADSL pots.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am getting this error on my PIX 535 with 8.0.4 code. The error is Error : OSPF/RIP cannot be enabled on failover interface, I am getting this error while trying to enable RIP on the firewall. The context is single mode and failover is enabled. When I am disabling the failover the Firewall is accepting the RIP configurations.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCurrently l have two ASA 5520's in a active/passive failover scenario. Currently the interfaces for the inside and outside are fixed at 100/FULL.I want to repatch them into GigE ports setup as Auto Negotiate.Is there anyway of keeping the connections through the firewall active in this type of scenrio or will l have downtime disconnecting and repatching? or could l possibly disable failover and reconfigure each ?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have been given a task, where I need to create a failover setup from a 1800 Cisco router to a LAN network 2 hobs away (see topology).The reason I have been given this task is because the wireless links are not so realiably, but necessary.I'm thinking of doing this failover task with IP SLA on the routers fiber 1 and fiber 2 link, so when/if one off the links goes down, it instantly chooses the other link.I have also been thinking about implementing STP instead, and replace the router with a switch, but i'm not sure exactly how to implement it. Unfortunately I'm not able to test anything, as we are still waiting for the fiber lines, but I want to be prepared as much as possible.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have a pair of ASA5510s in a failover configuration where I see these 2 logs repeated every 15 seconds.
105008 1 Nov 27 2012 10:39:27 (Primary) Testing Interface management
105009 1 Nov 27 2012 10:39:28 (Primary) Testing on interface management Passed
I have read other threads where these are accompanied by "105005, Lost Failover communications with mate on interface". But I'm only getting these 2. The other thing that is confusing is that the "management" interface is not the failover interface. So why do I see 105008/9 logs about it?
Output of "sh fail":
5510a# sh fail
Failover On
Failover unit Primary
[Code].....
What I am attempting to do is setup snmpv3 on two failover 5510's .The problem I am running into, the snmp management software rejects one of the devices as it sees it as having a duplicate engine ID since the two devices share the same config. Would like to know how this would work in an active/active setup being able to poll both devices.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have setup ASA5510 in failover mode. I am planning to use this setup for clientless SSL VPN and have following questions.
1. Do I have to license both firewalls for SSL VPNs? These licenses are very expensive and why would I have to purchase it for secondary when I am not using it?
2. SSL vertificate for the firewall it self. Do I have to acquire one or two to ensure users don't get annoying message about self signed certificate? Cisco doesn't seem to have this discussion in any documents. However I found following URL discussing from somebody's experience. What's official statement from Cisco on this matter? [URL]