I thing that i find some bug in the newest IOS 15.1.4M.
The case is falow:
I start to configure failover for the costomer - make default route, make the default path but i cant find the comand IP SLA monitor. Is some meet this problem with this IOS or just Cisco make some chenge in the CLI commands?
Tomorrow i will try with IOS version 15.1.1T.
have been tasked with completing a Cisco config update on an ISR.Client is running a Cisco 2911 running IOS version is 15.0(1)M6.They have added a new WAN interface to GigabitEthernet0/2 and are looking to setup a basic failover configuration to augment their current 0/0 Fiber connection.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI need to configure two links (active and failover) on router 2911. Do I need DATA LICENSE to configure this with static router and route-map?
View 4 Replies View RelatedWe are trying to make a VPN failover over two ASA's. However the 2 ASA's have different version and our smartnet have already expired. I was wondering if this VPN failover would work even if they are different? Or should I get a smartnet first to be able to download an updated ios?
ASA Version 8.0(3)6
ASA Version 7.0(6)
We've recently started using some 2911's on our network running IOS 15.0(1r)M9. I noticed, much to my frustration that the OIDs with the MIB RFC1213: ip RouteTable1.3.6.1.2.1.4.21 are not supported.
Any alternative MIB for viewing routing table information via SNMP on any of these devices running a similar IOS?
I am using Cisco 2911 & IOS version is 15.1. My problem is that after some days (e.g. 15-20 days), the routing table suddenly stops updating & then I have to enter the default route again to make it up. I am using Track 1 to track default route here. After primary link goes down, the Track is also going down but after coming the primary link up, the track is not coming up. So, I have to add the default route again to make it up.
View 2 Replies View RelatedMcAffee scan of acs 1113 appliance running the 4.2 build 124 patch 12 version reports that a medium vulnerability exists because the system has SSH version 1. Any way to specify only version 2 or turn off SSH?
View 9 Replies View RelatedI am having one router CISCO2911/K9 (Cisco 2911 w/3 GE,4 EHWIC,2 DSP,1 SM,256MB CF,512MB DRAM,IPB). But now my management asking me to upgrade this router as CISCO2911-SEC/K9.
What will be the BOM for this up gradation.
Can we use ACS 4.1 version recovery disc on 4.2 verison to recover the forgotten password.
View 1 Replies View Relatedwhich version of prime infrastructure supports wlc5508 version 7.4
View 2 Replies View Relatedprovide me with the important links which can show me how to do the software upgrade for my ASA 5520 ver 7.0(1) to ver 8.4 ? as well as the ASDM
View 10 Replies View Relatedi am using Cisco ASA 5510 with ASA Version 8.0(4) and memory 256MB. me to Upgrade it to 8.3
View 6 Replies View RelatedWe are looking to upgrade our WiSMs to version 7.0.230.0, but the Cisco compatibility matrix suggests we need to upgrade WCS to the same version (it is currently on 7.0.172.0). My question is can we upgrade the WiSMs and do the WCS at a later date with no issues or do we need to do them at the same time to keep visibility of everything?
The reason I ask is that some of my clients use lobby ambassador for some of their users and they will need wireless access on the day we are due to upgrade WCS (the WiSMs are due to be upgraded and rebooted earlier that morning.
I am looking at this doc to use an ASA + 2911 to do Policy Based Routing with multiple ISPs.From the linked doc, under the PBR scenario, what should the IP addresses be for the routers connection to the ISPs? It isnt labeled.
View 4 Replies View RelatedWhat specific commands are needed to configure qos on a router?
Two sites:
Cisco 2911 (site 1 ) Cisco 2911 (Site 2)
Data Vlan
Management Vlan
I want to configure QOS on Site 1 where the Data Vlan traffic is always marked higher than the management Vlan coming from Site 1.
I have one router 2911 with the following image c2900-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-4.M4.bin I have two IPS on this routers and I tried to configure the IP SLA on this and I`m not able to do it and I don´t know why. I can configure almost everything but not the IP SLA command.this is the config:
track 10 ip sla 1 reachability
delay down 10 up 1
!
track 20 ip sla 2 reachability
delay down 10 up 1
!
[code]....
What I need to do in this case? or why cannot configure the IP SLA?
I have a cisco 2911 router that is located in my head office LAN and I use this router to connect to my branch networks. I want to configure IP SLA Monitor on this router to track my WAN Links but it does not support the command IP SLA Monitor. My IOS VERSION is c2900-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-2.T1.bin. how I can configure IP SLA on my router.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a router Cisco 2911 with two possible Wan interfaces out and a backup configuration using IP SLA. When the Primary Interface goes down the traffic is automatically rerouted through the Backup Interface, but the problem I have is that when the traffic is going through the Backup Interface (because the Primary is down) if the Backup Interface also goes down, if the Primary goes up, the traffic is not automatically rerouted to the Primary Interface. And it looks to me like it keeps trying to goes out the Backup Interface and cannot see that the Primary is down. I guess that the pings are going out the backup Interface and as it is down the router doen't receive any anwer to the ping and doesn't change to the Primary.
The main configuration related to the IP SLA is this:
!
track 1 ip sla 1 reachability
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
description backup Interface
ip address 175.xx.xx.10 255.255.255.252
ip nat outside
[Code]....
We have 2911 with HWIC-4ESW. System image file is "flash0:c2900-universalk9-mz.SPA.152-1.T1.bin"_2911#sh inv NAME: "CISCO2911/K9 chassis", DESCR: "CISCO2911/K9 chassis" PID: CISCO2911/K9 , VID: V05 , SN: FGL16011005
[Code]....
The problem was that HWIC-4ESW no longer pass traffic although showing that the interfaces are up rebooting the router solved the problem. What IOS is more stable and not subject to this problem?
Recently i attempted to build a LAN 2 LAN VPN tunnel from an Asa to a 2911 running zone based firewall. This was a standard IPSec psk tunnel nothing fancy. I got the tunnel to establish but i could only get traffic to encap on the Asa side and decap on the 2911 side. I couldn't get return traffic.I followed this doc here for classic IPSec in the last example. URL
And I am sure the Asa is right I built a ton of those but I am new to zfw. I did not see anything about a NAT exempt rule. But since everything uses real IPs instead of NAT I wasnt sure and I could not find any info. Do I need to do NAT exempt? If so do you use a route map on the end of you NAT overload config line like in the past?
Also I have a zone-pair to "self" and I was not sure if I needed anything there to be able to ping the inside interface of the 2911 when the tunnel is up from the remote end.
I have to build HA environment, at the moment we have only one R1 and WAN1 but company wants to buy R2 + WAN2 and have HA between the routers, in case R1 or WAN1 goes down the other router will take over.
What would be standard methodology nowadays to do that - does HSRP will do what I need or it is better do some other way?
Does anyone know if it's possible to use a single interface on the ASA for both the failover interface and for stateful failover? Here's my situation.I'm looking to provision a pair of ASAs and I want to do stateful failover.The problem is that I need four interfaces (inside, outside, and two physical DMZ interfaces).I'm looking at either the 5520s or 5540s and these boxes need to run the IDS SSMs, so I can't use the 4-port expansion SSM.
I want to do stateful failover so I need two failover interfaces.What I'm wondering is if I can take one physical interface,run two subinterfaces on it, and then use those two subinterfaces for my failover and stateful failover interfaces.That would leave me with the four interfaces that I need for everything else
We have two sites connected by a gigaman line. Routing between the two sites is done with a couple of HP routers. We also have two separate Internet connections, one at each site, through different providers. The border firewall at one site is a Cisco 5505 and at the other site it is a Cisco 5510. If the gigaman line goes down, we would like to fail over to a site-to-site VPN. Any clue how to set this up? We can set up the site-to-site VPN. how to make it serve as a failover. Another question is whether the VPN will cause confusion when the gigaman is operational.
View 11 Replies View RelatedWhen I try to put my ASAs in active/standby config here is the error I get.Warning: Failover message decryption failure. Pleas make sure both units have the same failover shared key and crypto license or the system is out of memory.
View 1 Replies View RelatedThe active RP of ASR 1006 router automatically switched over to standby while the standby assumed the active role.Not sure the exact reason for this behaviour. The image version is 122-33.XNB1. We noticed an outage when the switchover happened but the device did not crash.
%CMANRP-6-CMHASTATUS: RP switchover, received fastpath becoming active event%CMANRP-6-CMHASTATUS: RP switchover, received chassis event to become active%REDUNDANCY-3-SWITCHOVER: RP switchover (PEER_NOT_PRESENT)%REDUNDANCY-3-SWITCHOVER: RP switchover (PEER_DOWN)%REDUNDANCY-3-SWITCHOVER: RP switchover (PEER_REDUNDANCY_STATE_CHANGE)%PLATFORM-6-HASTATUS: RP switchover, sent message became active. IOS is ready to switch to primary after chassis confirmation%NETCLK-5-NETCLK_MODE_CHANGE: Network clock source not available. The network clock has changed to freerun%CMANRP-6-CMHASTATUS: RP switchover, received chassis event became active%PLATFORM-6-HASTATUS_DETAIL: RP switchover, received chassis event became active. Switch to primary (count 3)
In the output of "show redundancy switchover history" the switchover reason given is active unit failed.But currently the RPs are working as active and standby hot.
I got PIX 525 with failover. Due to power issue one Unit was offline for a while. During this time couple of changes was done on the Firewall.
Which Unit becomes active when I plug the Firewall unit which was offline for a while now. Each Unit has 4 Ethernet Connection
E 0/0 - connects ISP Router
E 0/1 - connects to Lan switch
E 1/0 - connects to DMZ port
E 2/0 - connects to failover unit PIX
Ongoing problem I have been having regarding a l2l VPN connection between our ASA 5510 and a client's ASA 5505. The client's main ISP is Comcast and he uses a secondary AT&T internet connection as a failover. When Comcast goes down, AT&T comes up and everything works great...except for the VPN to our ASA5510. I have not been able to get the VPN connection to work on the failover network. I have set up a separate, "Backup_WAN", interface in the firewall for AT&T. All of the same rules are in place for AT&T as there are for the primary Comcast connection (the VPN for Comcast works just fine) but I still cannot get the VPN to work with the failover.
Why the VPN would not be working?
We have a customer requirement of providing secure connectivity from Remote Office to HQSame time to provide certain level of layer 3 redundancy via secondary link should the primary link fail We are looking at ASA5500 series firewall for both Remote office and HQ.Can this be done?
View 3 Replies View RelatedWhat are the max number of T1's that can be bundled on a 2911 router?
View 0 Replies View RelatedI need a interface v.35 on 2911 router, but it does not have WIC slot, it has EHWIC. Could some one told me if there are a card with V.35 interface that I can install in this model of router?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have the following setup where the Cisco ME 3400 provided by the ISP.
My Cisco 2911 is configured as below:
CORE_Router#sh run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 6075 bytes
[Code].....
I have a problem I am running into... I replaced a 2621 with a 2911. The 2911 has three interfaces and I need to use all of them... Description:
gige0/0 dhcp static IP from ISP, public IP, they assign me 4 more usable public IPs gige0/1 broken into four VLANS, 108, 109, 120, 127, ip nat on 109 for them to get to the internet, and a static translation on 127 for the phone system to get to the internet gige0/2 assigned another public IP. A tenent has a linksys router on this interface, they want a public IP.
The problem is that this setup worked, but when we moved to the 2911, some nat translations are failing, and we would like to figure out how to minimize the number of public IPs we use (right now it is three + the static assigned dhcp). The nat that is not working is the nats to the 2001-3001 range. I am not sure why it is failing, but the router seems to indicate it thinks some of these overlap. This router is also doing a vpn to an asa... that seems to be working fine.
Current config:
Current configuration : 6072 bytes
!
! Last configuration change at 14:31:44 UTC Thu Aug 2 2012
! NVRAM config last updated at 14:31:50 UTC Thu Aug 2 2012
[Code]....
I've got a 2911 with a primary ethernet link to the ISP, with BGP running over it. There's also an ADSL module in it, which will connect into the same ISP AS. how do i configure BGP over the ADSL so that it sits there doing nothing until the primary link fails? Do i need to setup a new instance of BGP with a different AS on the router or can it sit in the same AS as the primary link?
View 1 Replies View Related