Cisco Switches :: SG200 - Random Network Dropout
Jul 21, 2011
I have SG200 50/50 Port Switch and the devices that connect into it are servers and workstations
Few days and until we experience network dropouts and when take a look at the switch log it gives me this?
2147483423 2011-Jul-22 16:34:53 Informational %LINK-I-Up: gi3, aggregated (1)
2147483424 2011-Jul-22 16:34:53 Warning %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: gi3: STP status Forwarding, aggregated (1)
2147483425 2011-Jul-22 16:34:50 Warning %LINK-W-Down: gi3, aggregated (1)
2147483426 2011-Jul-22 16:34:37 Informational %LINK-I-Up: gi3
2147483427 2011-Jul-22 16:34:37 Warning %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: gi3: STP status Forwarding
2147483428 2011-Jul-22 16:34:27 Warning %LINK-W-Down: gi3
Device connected to gi3 is a Web Server
This is also happening on more ports ie 20-printer, 13-Cisco Wireless Access Point, 24 File Server etc., which I don't know what is going on. With my research, it said something about spanning protocol. Is this possible to disabled?
The other cisco switch where desktop are also connected doesn't have this error.
My firmware is 1.1.0.73
Boot Version 1.0.0.1
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Feb 7, 2013
I have been having intermittent wireless trouble. This includes Ping spiking, Wireless network drop-outs (The network stop appearing on available network list) and packet loss. This is all completely random (though very common) and is frustrating to say the least. As far as I know, the problem is not nearly as bad on other devices in the house , so I suspect that my network card has become shoddy. I have tried updating,removing,and re-installing network drivers to no avail. I have also used cmd and I have pinged 192.168.1.254, which shows random ping spikes, and some packet loss as well.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Aug 3, 2011
I just bought a SG200-18 in order to use LAG between a backup server and multiple computers and servers. Servers are supposed to all use 2 links and computers only 1.
As soon as I activate LAG on port 2 and 3, no matter what is connected on the switch I lose access to the switch interface (luckuly, it's still working on port 17 for a strange reason) and all computers / servers connected are randomly losing the network access. Everyrhing start to be slow but most servers and computers don't lose access to the internet. Browsing a web site will suddenly take ages but... it will work eventualy.
I already used LAG on other switch without a single issue.. The only uplink I have is to the router and I know that I don't have any issue with network cables....
So what am I doing wrong ??? I didn't even try to configure the TEAMING on the servers, just creating LAG on the switch will kill everything Oo.. I'm starting to think that my SG200 is dead out of the box.
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 24, 2011
SG200-08 and SG200-08P fail to hold or update Date/Time.(New installation for a UC320 setup.)I've got both an SG200-08 and SG200-08P that are failing to maintain date/time when set with "Use Local Settings". Every restart/powercycle causes them to reset to Dec 31 1969. Other settings save fine.I first tried to set time via SNTP Unicast using a variety of public time server addresses including the 3 hard coded to the SG200-08 firmware:
Sadly though it always just shows "Active Server Server Host Address: 0.0.0.0" and continues having 12/31/1969 as the date. Both after a config save and a reboot.I can ping the NTP servers just fine from the switches either by IP or by hostname.At this point I've decided that I must be missing something simple. At least I hope so... otherwise it's a firmware bug which means waiting for a fix.Other devices behind the same firewall/gateway (RVS4000) are updating NTP
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 29, 2012
how to connect our new SG200-18 to an existing Cisco network, in particular a C2960S.Here's what I've got:
<----- Rest of network ------- C2960S ----------- SG200 ----- (PC connected directly to the SG200)
On the C2960S-side here's what I've got on the corresponding interface:
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
switchport mode trunk
On the SG200-side I've set the IP-address and default-gateway accordingly, however:From the SG200 I can't ping any other host on the same IP-subnet as the switchFrom the SG200 can't ping the default-gatewaycan't ping from any other host or the default-gateway *to* the switch But:On the SG200 I've got plenty of MAC-addresses under "Dynamic Address Table" - however only MAC-addresses that belong to the management-VLAN of the SG200 (i.e. VLAN9 in my case)The MAC-address table on the SG200 even includes the MAC-addresses of hosts on the same VLAN I tried to ping without success. For example: I tried a PING from a host having a MAC-address of 00:19:bb:31:91:30. This MAC shows up in the arp table of the SG200. To cross check I connected a dedicated PC to the SG200 and assign it an IP-address out of the management-LAN-range of the SG200 - in this case I can access the switch (i.e. PING, WEB etc.)So to summarize: Connectivity is OK when going from directly connected devices to the SG200. No connectivity from devices that are behind the C2960S towards the SG200 and vice versa. (The problem is definitely not with the C2960S-side since we've got plenty of them hooked together without problems.) I'm enclosing the screenshots of the corresponding definitions on the SG200.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 16, 2013
I'm baffled by the poor performance that I'm seeing when passing traffic between my two Cisco SG switches.
The configuration is as basic as I can make it, no VLANs, QoS or bonding. Both have been updated to current firmware as part of the troubleshooting process.
When I transfer data within one of my switches I see 50/60Mb/s. When I pass the same traffic between both switches I see 0.6 Mbs/ or less.
I have tried to eliminate every possible factor including switching out the cables. No success.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 8, 2011
Acing some issues with my Belkin router, I can connect to it wirelessly and maintain an Internet connection. Sometimes I notice on my wifi signal symbol in my task bar that the connection closes and reconnects. This doesn't bother me too much, however, after doing that I don't know how many times it will reconnect but the network will not identify, which as you would know that if it cannot identify the network the access is limited and therefore I cannot connect to the Internet. I know it is a long winded problem but I am struggling to find out why this is happening. It is a Belkin f5d8636-4 v2 modem and a tp-link wireless adapter for my pc (achieving a 300mb/s wireless connection)...
View 19 Replies
View Related
Dec 17, 2012
We have an existing network with a Catalyst 4510 core switch and departmental 3560 switches connected via fiber. Due to company restructure we can no longer afford to buy new 3560's when anything goes wrong so this week I purchased an SG200-26 which I'm trying to get onto the network.
This is a legacy network which I didn't setup so my Cisco skills are somewhat limited (another reason for the SG200's hopefully), anyway have been looking at the configs on the existing switches and trying to match settings in the SG200 setup however not getting anywhere! I have the config from the dead switch so I can show what needs to be achieved, any experience in downgrading environment in a similar way?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Dec 29, 2012
Network running about 60 computers, most of which are running windows 7 professional. Some are on a domain, some are not.At (seemingly) random times, some computer on the network will lose the ability to browse websites (including the web interfaces of networked devices). I can't identify what circumstances cause this to occur. I only find out about it when someone calls me.From the affected computer:I can ping sites I can ping our Cyberoam UTM (which acts as our DNS, DHCP, and firewall)disabling/enabling connection doesn't fix the problem releasing/renewing ip doesn't fix the problem flushing dns doesnt fix the problem uninstalled antivirus on two test machines, problem still randomly manifests.replaced the Cyberoam with newer model users have claimed that if they wait a long period of time (40+ minutes) the problem sometimes resolves.rebooting the computer resolves the issue until it randomly occurs again changing the computer's mac address also resolves the issue until it randomly occurs again.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 2, 2012
We have a project in which we are using 34 Cisco SG200-18's each with a MGBLX1 (LC Single Mode Fiber) SFP mini-GBIC.All the fiber's come back to one building where we must "bridge" all 34 fiber connections. What hardware should be used to accomplish this? A L2 switch? For example, a 12 port SFP Switch with Fiber SFP's accepting the first 12 fiber connections, then other switch with SFP for the next 12 and so on, until there is a overall capacity of 36 and having patch cables between the 3 switches?
what cisco or non cisco hardware would work with these SF200-18's to accomplish this?
View 9 Replies
View Related
May 16, 2012
We are replacing some netgear switches with the Cisco SG200. The situation is relatively straightforward. We have a series of VLAN's coming in on a trunk from a service provider for our Metro Ethernet locations. These trunks then get cross-connect to various location for connectivity. The problem we have is there are two VLAN's that need to go to the same switch which provides access to our public IP block.
I set up the two VLAN's on the SG200 with the trunk port VLAN tagging on the service provider port. Then I set up a separate port for untagging the traffic with the PVID of the respective VLANS's as follows: [code] The public switch has no VLAN's configured (it is an SG200 too). If I connect GE2 to the public switch everything works fine. When I connect GE3 to the public switch, things die. I thought this might be caused by STP although STP should not be detecting issues like this across separate VLAN's. Disabled STP, no change.The same configuration with the Netgear worked without an issue. FYI, the VLAN's cannot be changed...they are defined by the service provider in this particular case. otherwise we'd just make them the same..
View 11 Replies
View Related
Aug 28, 2011
I need to purchase a few Gigabit PoE switches for a small business and I am thinking that SG200 or SG300 switches are perfect for this purpose.
Layer 3 functionality in SG300 switches is not great - HSRP or any other next-hop redundancy protocol is not supported, dynamic routing protocols are not supported, policy-based routing is not supported, etc. I may get one SG300 switch for inter-VLAN routing so that I do not have to send traffic to a Layer 3 device for this purpose, especially because my Layer 3 device (ASA5505) has only 10/100 Mbps interfaces. All other switches in the network don't have to be Layer 3 switches, and I am thinking of perhaps getting SG200 instead of SG300 swithces. However, because I am a long-time Cisco engineer, and know ins and outs of the IOS CLI, I would much rather administer the switches with CLI rather than GUI. So, do SG200 switches provide CLI (even if it is not officially supported) or is the only Small Business switch platform that supports CLI SG300? I do realize that the OS running on these switches is not IOS, but after having reviewed the CLI manual for SG300, I would say that 90+% of commands are identical to IOS CLI commands.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 27, 2012
I just picked up a pair of 18-port SG200s, and I'm trying to figure out of there's some secret trick to getting CLI access to them? I've upgraded to the latest version of firmware (1.2.7.76) hoping that may work, but no luck.I can tell the guts to support a CLI are there, because writing the config out to a TFTP server shows identical an identical config style to the SG500 I have here.Is there some way to enable it?
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 22, 2011
I am trying to set up three vlans across two switches. The switches are Cisco SG200 and SG 300 series. There are 20 devices connected to the two switches including a router for Internet. Among these devices are five wireless access points all hardwired to the LAN. If I understand correctly the first thing I have to do is aggregate the two switches. I ran two cat5 cables to ports 1 and 2 of each switch. As I understand it all I need to do is to create SAG with the two ports on each switch. I think I need to use tagging but I don't really understand how to do this. Once I get the trunking set up correctly I want to create one vlan to which all devices will belong for Internet access. The other two would be for data and VoIP. Do I create vlans with the same name on both switches? When I assign the devices (by port) do I need to enable tagging? Which type of port setting should I use? I am assuming that by including the acess points in the vlans will mean that any wireless device connected to them will have acess to the Internet and the devices in the same vlan.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 15, 2011
With the new firmware (1.1.2.0) released for SG200 switches, is there CLI now?
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 22, 2013
I am trying to connect an SG200 to a customer's existing network. The customer does not want to receive any bpdu frames from the SG200. The customer's port has bpdu guard configured to err-disable their port upon receipt of a bpdu.
How do I completely disable spanning tree on the SG200 so that it does not send any bpdus?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 19, 2013
My SG20-50P Switch Log appears as follows with Random ports going up and down. I am trying to find out if this links to another problem I'm having with a Client Server software locking up on the client end. The hardware, thin clients and desktops, are working and have checked all sleep and power settings. All items in working order, now I'm wondering about the switch
Code...
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 11, 2011
I saw the announcement stating that "200 and 300 Switches now supports Cisco Pre-standard POE" available here:[URL]However, I cannot find the 1.1.1.8 firmware for the SG200-08P in the download center (latest is 1.0.1.0).Does this mean this doesn't apply to the SG200-08P?If it doesn't apply, any other switches with 16 or less all gigabit ports which support legacy PoE?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 30, 2011
I have a new sg200-08 smart swith. I cant git it to work (No link) on the NIC.
I have tested:
Different cables cat5-6
Different ports 1-8
4
different computers
When i power on the sitch the only led who lights up is port 1, no system led.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 23, 2011
I just purchased a SG200-50P switch to replace a WS-CE500-24LC, that had a limited amount (4) of PoE ports. I was running Cisco 7940 IP Phone, Cisco AP1231 and AP1100 series access points via PoE off of this switch.
When I attempt to plug in these device types into the SG200-50P they do not power up. What is going on? Why do these devices (7940 IP Phone, 7960 IP Phone, AP1100 series access point, AP1231 series access point) not get PoE from the SG200-50P switch?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 16, 2013
I have an SG200 switch and am trying to import a certificate signed by my own CA. I generate the CSR and sign it using Java's key tool with my own root cert. When I attempt to import the resulting cert, the switch blanks out the certificate text box and deletes all of my d name data (CN, etc) from the switch. What am I missing?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 9, 2012
When I came back home today I saw that my SG200-08 switch did not look fine.Basically, the system LED of the switch keeps blinking and end devices connected just don't have any network.I tried to reset the switch with the "reset" button (with a paper clip) the system LED was orange during just a second and then continue to blink.What is wrong with the switch?Is there a way to flash a new firmware and/or to delete the configuration file?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 12, 2013
I am thinking of buying a SG200-26P switch and have a few questions:Is it possible to disable the PoE function on the 12 PoE ports?I need al the ports but only 6 with PoE.What happens when you connect a non PoE device to a PoE port?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 24, 2011
I got a new switch and am trying to connect a UCS server to it. I can ping the switch just fine but when I try to use IE8 or firefox, I can't get to the web interface to configure it.
Here's my setup:
Cisco UCS C210 M2
IP = 192.168.1.100
Subnet = 255.555.255.0
[Code].....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 17, 2013
I have an SG300-10 and an SG200-26. I also have an OpenWRT flashed router that can tag VLANs.My problem right now is that my default VLAN is 1, my router is doing DHCP in VLAN 1, and I want all my network equipment to be on VLAN 1, but my SG200, when LAGed to the SG300, will not get an IP.My SG300 is pulling an IP just fine from my router DHCP pool. When I connect the SG200 directly using either 1UP port settings or 1TP port settings, I get an IP just fine. When I LAG my connection (ports 1-3 on both) I get no DHCP information sent through the LAG to either the SG200, nor to any client devices that are set for DHCP.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Apr 24, 2013
what the intention behind adding SSH to the SG200 series switches was. Is it to allow SCP copies to and from the switch for configuration and firmware updates OR is it to allow CLI access to the switches.
I have tried to SSH to the switch using PuTTY from Windows and native SSH from Linux/Unix clients, but nothing happens.
Is there some other area of configuration to enable communcation via SSH?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 23, 2012
I used LACP on port 49 and 50.After upgrade firmware from 1.0.0.19 to 1.1.2.0 my LAG1 stay down...all port member stay down, port link is up but LAG stay down...I testtu delete and reconfigure LAG1 but nothing work...
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 12, 2012
I am having issues getting clients to DHCP off of a teamed adapter through the Cisco Switch. If I run a one to one cable from the server to the switch it works fine, but when I switch over to the Intel QuadNic in Team Mode then the PXE clients do not get a DHCP address from that server anymore.
I have configured the Team mode on the Windows Server 2008 R2 and given the and configured the LAG with the 4 plugs on the Cisco SG200-26 switch in the LAG Management. It says the link is up and if I give the client a static IP I can ping the server and the server can ping the switch.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 22, 2013
My second problem with sg200-08 (firmware: SG200-08x_FW_1.0.6.2.stk) is when I try to add specific MAC address as secure:MAC Address Tables - Static Addresses - Add; insert vlan id, port, mac address and select "Secure":I get error message: "Error: Failed to Add 'Static Address' entry.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 14, 2011
We have two Web Servers and configured as Network Load Balancing in a cluster for failover.
WEB1 IP: 192.168.1.50
WEB2 IP: 192.168.1.51
Both configured with Cluster IP: 192.168.1.100 on Multicast mode.
TEST ON LAB USING ORDINARY 10/100 UNMANAGED SWITCH I can ping all the IP addresses on the LAN and when I http://192.168.1.110 on any PC on the LAN works no problem.
TEST ON PRODUCTION USING CISCO SG200 50/50 PORT SWITCH I can ping all the IP addresse on the LAN and when I http://192.168.1.110 on a different machine i did not work, but on the server itself will work as expected.
NOTE: Both tests are on LAN only.
I wonder if this is something to do with the switch because of Cluster IP MAC address. Do I need to configure something on the switch?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 27, 2013
I have a problem with my SG200, maybe more than one.
I tried to update to 1.3.0.59 this morning. It succeeded and the switch was restarted. After the restart I could no longer log into the switch. I tried to reset the switch but it still will not let me log in. I also tried to log into the switch using the forllowing method but I still cannot log in. I unpluged everything, held the reset for at least 30 seconds, waited 3 minutes, plugged a computer in and set it up to see the switch. All worked there and the login page appeared. It still would not take my login dredentials nor wold it that the default credentials. I has access through the switch but connot configure anything.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 24, 2012
My switch Cisco small business SG200-26G in modality link aggregation LACP the Wake On Line doesn't work !! (WOL work only in link aggregation non LACP..) I already upgrade the latest firmware but not resolved..
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 24, 2012
I am interesting if GLC-SX-MM sfp modules are compatible with following switches: SG500X-48-K9-G5 and SG200-18.
View 7 Replies
View Related
