Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 ACL Block TCP Traffic One Way
Jul 14, 2010
Got servers in vlan 10 ip range 10.0.0.0 and servers in vlan 20 ip range 20.0.0.0 at the same layer 3 switch. (c6509 sup720)I would like to block TCP traffic initiated from Vlan 20 to Vlan 10. But the servers in Vlan 10 needs to be able to open an TCP connections to Vlan 20 did test with the ACL thats blocking (ack/established/syn) but unable to get it to work.Or it works both directions or is works non directions.
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Oct 3, 2012
I am attempting to block all FTP traffic on port 21 from the servers in my network, and only allow FTP from one server to go out.
I have created the following ACL
access-list 101 Permit ip any any
access-list 101 Permit 21 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 any
access-list 101 Deny 21 any any
and have applied it to my truck VPN that goes up to my firewall
int Vlanxxx
ip access-group 101 out
But when i test ftp is still allowed by all servers.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 16, 2013
Is there a way to block lan to lan traffic (except lan to gateway/gateway to lan traffic of course) on a Cisco 2960?
View 9 Replies
View Related
May 29, 2012
We have a Catalyst 6509 switch, and we hope to use policy based routing to redirect http traffic to my proxy server, where I can find the configuration example?
View 11 Replies
View Related
Feb 5, 2013
I am trying to connect a Control network that can not have access to the Internet, or any other network for that matter, to my Admin network so that I can retrieve trend data about the plant that goes into a database. Right now the process is print information, hand jam into excel spreadsheet, print again, and hand jam into another excel spreadsheet on the other network. Reports are printed automatically once a day, but would like a simplified way of getting data from one network to the other without having to re-enter data several times. Current policies stipulate no USB drives connected to Control systems. Even if we could loosen that, personnel needed to transfer data is not available and going to each individual machine would take more time than current system.Now that background is laid, I have two 2911 ISR routers with EIGRP configured, each with a 4 port EHWIC card. The 3 L3 ports on the router are setup as follows: interface G0/1 to the internet, interface G0/2 to a wireless back haul, and interface G0/0 for IT network. I then have 3 VLANs setup on the EHWICs for our Admin network. We will move the IT network to a VLAN on the remaining EHWIC port and connect the two 2911's through the G0/0 interface. I am going to have one computer on my Administration network dedicated to receiving the information and have a program that will take that data and import it to a database. I need to allow only that computer to receive traffic from the Control network and I need no traffic to flow back into the Control network. In other words I will transmit data from the control network to the admin computer using one protocol (TFTP more than likely) and block any other traffic coming out of and going into the Control network.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 8, 2011
I would like to have a view of ip traffic on NX7000 as I am used on 6509 OIS, running the above commands: [code] Finding something like on 7000 ?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 27, 2013
i recently identified all switch ports in my network on 6509 core were Transmitting Mail server Exchange traffic that was destined for Unicast NLB cluster. and it was impacting various HOST machines NIC cards/performance.After reading this article, i moved NLB CAS servers behind a dedicated cisco Switch.
[URL]
Now My core switch can learn mac address across its trunk port where CAS servers are connected on dedicated switch. but still i can see traffic Transmitting out to my all switch ports of same VLAN ( same as NLB VLAN).
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 3, 2012
I have a Cisco C3560CG which is running C3560c405ex-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 12.2(55)EX2.The switch has vlan 1 and vlan 50 configured, vlan 50 should have access to a limited number of host in vlan 1.The following acl has been applied on the inbound to vlan 50:
10 permit tcp 10.16.30.0 0.0.0.255 host 192.168.15.243 eq 137 138 139 445
20 permit udp 10.16.30.0 0.0.0.255 host 192.168.15.243 eq netbios-ns netbios-dgm netbios-ss 445
25 permit icmp 10.16.30.0 0.0.0.255 host 192.168.1.243
26 permit ip 10.16.30.0 0.0.0.255 host 10.16.30.254
30 permit ip 10.16.30.0 0.0.0.255 host 192.168.15.254
[code]....
I sure the above would work, but for some reason some of the packet counter are not incrementing but the traffic is being blocked. But I would like to see the counter increment.Also I have that I may beed to use VACL wouls this be the case?
View 26 Replies
View Related
Feb 21, 2013
I have One switch 3750 and many switch 2960 c.I use one ASA 5510 to reach emote branche site (vpn conexion).I use one router 1841 for internet conexion.Router 1841, ASA and catalyst 2960 are connected on the 3750.Default gateway of all user is ASA IP
I configured Vlan 3750 and it work.Now I need to implement security : permit/block specific traffic between vlan [code] From vlan 72 I cannot have remote access on computer in vlan 34 and I cannot ping computer in vlan 34.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 26, 2012
On a Catalyst 6509 switch I have configured wccp protocol in order to redirect the Http traffic to a Bluecoat SG8100. It was working fine until a new L3 interface implementation.Thereafter I was unable to redirect the http traffic due to an error reported from the Cat6509: [code] After some checks I supposed that the problem should be the UDP 2048 port connection between the Switch and the Bluecoat while the switch L3 port and the bluecoat are on the same Lan. A deep analysis found that the WCCP protocol seems to be as follow:
-Proxy address 10.64.28.240 to Switch Port 10.64.28.250 Here I Am
-Switch Port 10.64.28.250 to Proxy address 10.64.28.240 I See You
-Switch Port 10.66.0.251 to Proxy address 10.64.28.240 UDP 2048 packet (dropped by firewall)
It's strange to me that the first dialog is correctly handled by the correct Cat6509 interface while the UDP packets are flowing from another Vlan interface not configured with the WCCP and apparently not involved on the protocol.Last of all the WCCP is now disabled and unusable?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 21, 2011
I'm receiving multicast traffic (400Mbps) on port 9/38 and sending it out on port gi9/48. I'm trying to achieve that traffic will stay within the card without using the switchfabric,
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 5, 2012
We run a workers camp here and we currently have around 2500-3000 people using our 100MB internet pipe. We are upgrading the pipe to 200MB soon but I still would like to limit how much bandwidth everyone is using.
We allow streaming media such as Netflix, youtube, apple TV and of course .So it gets full pretty fast. We have QOS implemented although I wasn't here when it was done so I don't know a lot about it. I would like to limit IPs to a certain amount of bandwidth. [code]
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 6, 2012
I am aware that the 3750 switches are not able to support Netflows, so I have created a SPAN port and spanning traffic from a specific port. I would like to create a seperate VLAN and trunk the traffic from the SPAN port down to the 6509 switch and then capture all the traffic for that VLAN on the 6509.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 27, 2011
We have a pair of 6509 working in a VSS configuration (IOS 12.2(33)SX5). The 6509s connect to a pair of ASAs (7.2 code) running in an Active/Standby setup. These ASAs in turn connect to routers going to remote sites. I have configured Netflow on the following VLANS,
VLAN 10 - Servers Vlan
VLAN 9 - Transit/ASA VLAN (connects ASAs to 6509s). All traffic originating from any VLAN on the 6509 crosses this VLAN in order to reach remote sites and vice versa
I configured the netflow source VLAN 11 although I am not collecing any netflow from it.Although I have been getting lots of Netflow info, I noticed that netflow for traffic originating from any user VLAN on the 6509s going to any remote site via TRANSIT/ASA VLAN(9) does not get reported, I even tested with 4 GB traffic but no result. Only reverse traffic (i.e. from remote site to user VLAN) is reported as it traverses the Transit VLAN (9).
I read somewhere that egress netflow is not supported in 6500, but isnt traffic originating from a user vlan to a remote site via the transit VLAN (9) considered ingress with respect to the transit VLAN (9)? I would like to know whether bidirectional Netflow is supported on 6500 VLANS. I have mimimum control on routers beyond the ASAs, and since these ASAs run 7.2 code netflow is not supported, and Monitoring this Transit Vlan gives me extremely useful info.
I do get netflow biderectional traffic from the Server Vlan 10, but I think it is correlated by the netflow collector from vlans 9 and 10. [code]
View 9 Replies
View Related
Nov 21, 2011
I currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:
x3 48 ports
x1 NAM
x2 Sup720
Running 12.2(18)SXF3
I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis?Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 21, 2011
I currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:
x3 48 ports
x1 NAM
x2 Sup720
Running 12.2(18)SXF3.I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis. Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 29, 2012
I have an ASA 5520 with the below config
Gi0/0: outside (Internet)
Gi0/1: inside (Internal users)
Gi0/2: DMZ (web servers, ftp, Mail etc..)
I have a SMTP relay deployed on the DMZ for mailing. I have also a mail servers installed in the internal lan,
I want to allow trafic from dmz to reach internal lan, and i want normally also allow stmp relay from dmz to reach Internet.
How can i block trafic from DMZ to reach Internal Lan (instead of smtp) if the to allow trafic from dmz to internet i must put ANY in the policy?
For allowing trafic from DMZ to reach Internet, the policy must be DMZ -----> ANY ----->Services., this policy means DMZ can implicity reach Internal Lan?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 11, 2012
we've had an issue with our network, we have 2 6509 connected with redundancy, which are connected with 2 x 4900 Switches, from which are connected to a ESX Chassis for visualization, the thing is that the ESX stopped working, and the 4900 switches, and the main core were suffering from overload, they hang on it very well, in order to stop the overload, one of the links to the ESX Chassis were disconnected from one of the 4900 switches. The CPU usage from the 4900 and the core(6509) went down below 40%, and then they started to migrate the virtual servers from the chassis to another 2 chassis that were added right after. They were actually working well, but suddenly the 6509 changed to the other supervisor after everything was OK. We were wondering what could have been the cause of this, maybe the virtual servers migrations, maybe the overload from the ESX ? We also had a few question, is there any need to reload the cores every few months as a planned task ? Because the cores have been up for more than 1 year. And also is there any kind of of tool to monitor the CPU status, or the status overall from the cores or the switches ?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 11, 2012
The have around 80 staff and I think the current infrastructure is overkill for the size of the company. The current kit is old and they have no GB ethernet ports. They currently have:-
Core Switch:
1x Cisco c6509with a 48 port fast ethernet module (WS-X6248-RJ-45)
and an 8 port fibre module (WS-X6408A-GBIC)
I'm looking to replace this with something with 72 ethernet ports and 8 fibre ports
Access Switches:
2x 3500Replacement needs at least 48 ports and 2 fibre modules each
and 2x 5500Replacement needs at least 72 ports and 2 fibre modules each.
View 13 Replies
View Related
Sep 25, 2012
we have Cisco 6509 as a access switch in our network. Each user has an IP phone and a computer. we are going to implement 802.1X for end users by next month. I need to check all the users activity in the network like if someone plug an access point to the network or a router.I just checked Cisco NAC and how to detect those activities on the network.
I need to get more details on Cisco NAC or other products for that purpose. also what is the difference between Cisco NAC and application like Microsoft TMG?
is it agent less or I have to install something on computers? is it working as a default router for users computers?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 26, 2012
If client gateway = 192.168.64.9 then next-hop = 192.168.64.8 else use default-route 0.0.0.0
I know it's possible to do a route-map match ip-address ACL list. But is it possible to match on gateway?
Some info about hardware and config:
6509-E in VSS (IOS 12.2(17r)SX5) withVS-S720-10G supervisor.
All routes are static, IP for 192.168.64.9 is on SVI vlan.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 6, 2012
I have two ISPs. Each is on it's own subnet connected to the 6509 MSFC/Switch. FW1 is on 100.1.100.0/30 and FW2 is on 200.1.200.0/30 subnet. My goal is route all traffice going to the Internet from subnet 10.133.3.0/24 to FW1 and all other subnets across the organization to FW2. I am not sure if I need to use ACL / Static route combo, or just a static routes or ACLS?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 8, 2012
I would like to ask you if it's possibile to block routing between some Vlan for just once of them.
Maybe I can explain better:
I've got a Cisco 6509 with 4 configured vlan interfaces
Int Vlan 10 10.10.1.0/24
Int Vlan 20 10.10.2.0/24
Int Vlan 30 10.10.3.0/24
Int Vlan 40 10.10.4.0/24
Vlan "10" is the phone voip Vlan and it must not talk with the others Vlan. The others Vlan can comunicate normally except with Vlan "10".
Pratically Vlan "10" needs to be isolated from the others.
This equirement comes becouse Vlan 10 is wireless and has the WEP key encryption (very weak protocol). Some Phone couldn't support the WPA2 key and I need to avoid an unauthorized external client, cracking the WEP key and connecting to this WiFi, could have free access to the others Vlan.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 14, 2012
I have a problem on my catalyst 6509 on which I would like to do the following things :
I have some Vlans in which multicast is enabled.
In tose Vlan theres is a router which is default router for equipements.
I had enabled multicast routing because some Vlan needs to exchange multicast informations, but I wolud like to make difference between Multicast traffic. For example I have 5 vlans:
Vlan 1 and 2 need to exchange Multicast informations but the don't need multicast information from Vlan 3 and 4
Vlan 3 and 5 need to exchange Multicast informations but the don't need multicast information from Vlan 1 and 2
Vlan 5 is independant Vlan but doesn't need to have multicast information from all others vlan.
Last problem, equipement on differents vlan can use the same Mulkticast group address. In this case, Multicast routing is not working between Vlan 1 to Vlan 2 and Vlan 3 to Vlan 4.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Mar 6, 2012
I need to setup my 6509 with PBR going to two different Firewalls. The 6509 has vlans and multiple serial interfaces. What/where do I install the policy-maps? I want to direct one of the vlans to one firewall and the other vlans and wan subnets to the other firewall.
View 26 Replies
View Related
Nov 3, 2012
I need to block the P2P traffic on a Cisco router. How can do it effectively? I configured NBAR on my router but still users can download using the utorrent client.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 23, 2012
We recently updated a site2site link to metro ethernet, ISP call it 100mbps LAN Extension, but to me it is just QinQ over fibre connection. Most went well, one thing (annoying to me) is we can not ping our switches on both ends anymore.
We have a 3750 in headend and another 2960 on the other end. I used to be able to ping/telnet to the management IP from one to the other. Now we can not. I think the ISP is applying some configuration on ports of their customer-premises equipments (both are Cisco switches) but agent in ISP told me no. I thought there is some configuration on Cisco switch to block "MAC discovery" but i just can not remmenber what was that and google also failed me this time.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 22, 2013
where is the best place to block unwanted traffic? By that I mean, should I block it at the router, firewall, IPS? As an example, I'm dealing with DNS flood attacks - probably DDoS and reflection. I have a pair of Cisco 2821 routers with two different ISPs doing BGP. Behind that I have an ASA 5510 with IPS module. Behind that I have 2 public DNS servers. Over the last few days I've seen an increase in bogus DNS queries - high volume, distributed. My question is where is the best place to put the ACL to block them? I've been putting them on the ASA, but when the attack is running, it jacks the CPU to 60%. If I don't put the ACL, the IPS seems to pick them up after a while and the CPU is almost as high as with the ACL. I haven't tried to put the ACL on the routers.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 22, 2012
I have 4 vlan and all has conectivity/access with all (VLAN10,VLAN20,VLAN30 and VLAN40, I use a 3560 Switch for this propose, I need to modificate one vlan (VLAN40) that has access to the rest of the VLAN's BUT the rest of the VLAN's dont have access to VLAN40. I know that it is a problem of access-list BUT I can't undertand how to obtain the result that I like
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 26, 2012
I have a 2800 router and tried so many ways to block the unwanted sites on my office network.Like access list ip based, null0 routing and policy map. Faced issues with below config
1. Creating Access-list. very difficulty to block the sites with https those sites will be opend, and we cant block all the IPs
2. Creating null0 routing. it also a bit deficult the block maximum sites because we can't fiend all IPs for those sites
3. Policy map.. with policy map we can only 1site we can block, but not more than one..
I heard that port based routing or port based access-list are the best ways to stop the websites in my local network..for this one i need to map the site to unsued ports then i need to null rouging or need to create the access-list.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 23, 2012
I have a cisco 2800 router.. (flash:/c2800nm-advsecurityk9-mz.151-4.M4.bin, Version 12.4(13r)T11) configured DHCP, DNS, NATING and Bandwidth restriction...And to stop some social network [URL] i configured ip route 66.220.144.0 255.255.240.0 Null0 (rang of facebook address) But still i am able to open facebook.com in my network...
ADMIN-II_2811#sh run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 1812 bytes
!
! Last configuration change at 17:26:33 UTC Sat Nov 24 2012
version 15.1
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
[code]....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 16, 2012
Is it possible to block outside P2P traffic on a guest wireless network using an ACL on the controller? I know we can do it our firewall
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jan 28, 2013
I'm using ASA 5515X my concern is I was not able to block the traffic of P2P such as BitTorrent etc. I was also view some technotes on how to use webfilter without using Websense or Smartfilter tools and lucky I'm able to block certain websites. how to block the traffic of P2P?
View 2 Replies
View Related
