Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 / 4900 - Network Down Cause Switching Supervisor With Redundancy

Jan 11, 2012

we've had an issue with our network, we have 2 6509 connected with redundancy, which are connected with 2 x 4900 Switches, from which are connected to a ESX Chassis for visualization, the thing is that the ESX stopped working, and the 4900 switches, and the main core were suffering from overload, they hang on it very well, in order to stop the overload, one of the links to the ESX Chassis were disconnected from one of the 4900 switches. The CPU usage from the 4900 and the core(6509) went down below 40%, and then they started to migrate the virtual servers from the chassis to another 2 chassis that were added right after. They were actually working well, but suddenly the 6509 changed to the other supervisor after everything was OK. We were wondering what could have been the cause of this, maybe the virtual servers migrations, maybe the overload from the ESX ? We also had a few question, is there any need to reload the cores every few months as a planned task ? Because the cores have been up for more than 1 year. And also is there any kind of of tool to monitor the CPU status, or the status overall from the cores or the switches ?

View 3 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Switching/Routing :: C4510 With Redundancy Supervisor 7E Crashed

Oct 31, 2011

Our company's c4510 with redundancy supervisor 7E just been crashed, first the master then the slave. What should I do ?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4507R Configuring Supervisor Engine Redundancy

Feb 14, 2012

How to configure Supervisor Engine Redundancy between two different cisco 4507R and 4506E.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Supervisor IOS Upgrade

Oct 16, 2012

We are trying to upgrade the IOS on one of our 6509 switches. We have two 720 10GE supervisors running in SSO. Our procedure is reload the standby supervisor with the new IOS. We understand that you can only use one console connection when in RPR mode so we rely on the active supervisor giving us information that the standby unit is up and running.
 
The problem we have is that when we do a "show Module" on the switch the online diagnostics for the standby supervisor comes back us unknown. [code] We believe the active supervisor can see the standby supervisor because when we save the configuration we get a message saying that the config is sync'd with the standby router. We have a TAC case raised to investigate. We are upgrading from 12.2(33) SXI1 to 12.2(33) SXJ3

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 SSO Redundancy IOS Upgrade

Sep 9, 2012

I have a 6509 switch with SSO Redundancy (STANDBY HOT) with IOS ver 12.2(17d)SXB11, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) (c6k222-jk9sv-mz.122-17d.SXB11.bin). I need to upgrade the IOS on this switch.I have 512MB Memory on the switch and 40144896 bytes free on Disk0.which IOS is the latest version to upgrade and also give me some hints for IOS upgrade on this switch?

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 How To Configure VSS With Two Different Supervisor Engine

Oct 1, 2012

I have configured the VSS in two cisco 6509-E series with only one supervisor engine, but if i configured with two supervisor engine. it is going to common mode. One supervisor engine is 3c and 3cxl.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Adding A Redundant Supervisor?

Feb 10, 2012

I would like to add a redundant supervisor to my core 6509. Is this tricky to do? I know they have to be running the same IOS. I am worried if I put the new supervisor in it will write over the exsisting running config.

Catalyst 6000 supervisor 2 (Active)    WS-X6K-S2U-MSFC2
Policy Feature Card 2       WS-F6K-PFC2
Cat6k MSFC 2 daughterboard  WS-F6K-MSFC2

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Supervisor Upgrade With FWSM?

Oct 8, 2012

We are planning to upgrade the IOS on our two 6509E supervisors in the next few weeks. We currently run IOS 12.2(33) SXI1 and are upgrading to 12.2(33) SXJ3. At the moment the two supervisors are in SSO mode and after reading many articles it says that when the images are different on the two supervisors they are in RPR mode. When you then reload the active supervisor it will reboot all the line cards.
 
1. Is above correct? Will my line card reload?

2. We also have a FWSM installed, When/If the line cards are rebooted does the FWSM also reboot?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Failed Supervisor On 6509 Chassis?

Jan 28, 2012

swapping out a failed supervisor card on a 6509 chassis?

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Crash When Upgrading Supervisor Card

Nov 23, 2011

Problem I have encountered when upgrading a Cisco 6509 chassis with a new supervisor card from Sup2 to Sup 720b. The 6509 loads and then crashes completely, and when rebooted reloads into rommon.The same upgrade was performed on a similar switch with no apparent problems.
 
[code]....

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Run VSS On 6513 / 6509 Considering Both Has Same Supervisor Engine 2T And IOS Image

Jun 25, 2012

Is it possible to run VSS on 6513 and 6509 when considering both has same supervisor engine 2T and same IOS image.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 6509-E / Replace Supervisor Engine 720 10GE

May 15, 2012

we have Supervisor Engine 720 10GE (VS-S720-10G) in slot 5 on Catalyst 6509-E. Slot 6 is free. We need to replace VS-S720-10G. Is it possible the following scenario 

1. we will insert new VS-S720-10G into the slot 6
2. then we will remove the  faulty VS-S720-10G from the slot 5
 
Will everything work without interuptions. Is any document where I can find step-by-step procedure how to replace VS-S720-10G ?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 / Provide Internet Redundancy To Local LAN User Running In HSRP?

May 7, 2013

One of our customer ,  where there 2 6509 switch , one is Core_sw1 and other is Core_sw2 , catering about 32 Vlan , and HSRP in running for all Vlans , till here no problem , now there internet Router which having one Internet link , which connected and configured on Core_sw1 in a way that one interface of Core_sw1 is given Public IP and there is vlan 85 which internet vlan and vlan 85 ip are natted with that public IP with one simple static route given toward internet router , this is how internet is working ok.
 
Now i have configured  vlan 85 in hsrp as all other are , how can give redundancy to vlan  85 user , that if Core_sw1 get down , internet traffic can get out through Core_sw2.using same internet router with single internet link .i am not talking of ISP redundancy , but Vlan 85 in Core_sw1 goes down , other Core_sw2 will server internet.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4900 HSRP For LAN Fail-over

Jan 23, 2012

Planning to implement HSRP in layer 3 switch.

We have two numbers of Cisco 4900 ME Switches. Basically want LAN failover from these devices. There are about 400 users in our network. I have attached rough network topology for your reference(I am not good at Microsoft Visio). Need to know implementation of the HSRP in these switches. Two distribution switches(Cisco 4900 ME Switches) are connected to 4 Access switches and these are connected to the LAN.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Mac Filter Not Working On 4900 Switch

Aug 28, 2012

VLAN MAC address filter does not seem to be working on my 4900 switch. However the same config works fine when tested on my 3750 & 3560 switches.
 
Since user from different VLANs requires to be blocked, Unicast MAC address filter will not be feasible solution. VACL did not work on my 4506 switch too. K
  
Below is the config done on 4900 switch
 
mac access-list extended ABCpermit host 0003.0de9.d5ea anyexit
!
vlan access-map drop-mac 10

[Code]......

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: ME 4900 Private VLAN Config

Feb 9, 2012

We need to connect several DSLAMs on the 4900 switch, every DSLAM has 4 VLANs configured (VOIP service, MGMT, ADSL Private, ADSL Public), and sends the traffic for each service tagged with appropriate VLAN id according to the table:
 
VOIP: 608
MGMT: 594
ADSL PRIVATE: 2900
ADSL PUBLIC: 2930
 
On the DSLAM side it is very simple configuration, just a normal trunk with 4 VLANs transversing the link. On the 4900 I need to isolate the traffic for ADSL PRIVATE & PUBLIC service so DSLAMs connected to the same switch do not have L2 connectivity between them. For VOIP and MGMT they must communicate with each other. DSLAM acts also as a VOIP GW so it must communicate with other DSLAMs for VOIP service. Also VLAN 200 is configured on ME 4900 for switch management traffic.
 
This 4900 Switch connects to MPLS PE router, which offers L3 VPN service for VOIP & MGMT service, and L2 VPN for ADSL service (PPPoE traffic to BRAS). Fortunately we have ES+ linecard to support many ethernet features. I tried this config:
 
1) VOIP, DSLAM-MGMT, MPLS-MGMT configured as normal VLANs
2) ADSL PUBLIC & PRIVATE configured as isolated secondary VLANs, primary VLAN for ADSL PRIVATE is 2008, for PUBLIC 2308
3) Configure DSLAM facing ports on ME 4900 as private-vlan trunks
4) Configure ME 4900 uplink port to MPLS PE as a private-vlan promiscous trunk
5) Configure ethernet services on MPLS PE for each tag that comes from ME 4900 (ES+ cards are awesome, i love them:D )
6) Apply L3 VPN service for VOIP and DSLAM-MGMT, and L2 VPN for ADSL service.

But at least this last command should list on spanning tree forwarding state also the ADSL VLANs or not?
 
Here is the output of the show interface switchport.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4900 Span Configuration On Switches

Sep 16, 2012

i have configured SPAN on cisco 4900 series switches its a Loacal SPAN . as there is only commnads to complete this activity but hard luck its not working.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: L3 Routing With Catalyst 4900 Series?

Mar 19, 2013

I have peculiar challenge ahead of me and would like to get new perspectives.
 
The objective is to route specific VLAN traffic and the caveat is that I have multiple VLANs with the same network address.
 
For example:
 
VLAN100 10.10.10.0/28 VLAN101 10.10.11.0/28 VLAN102 10.10.12.0/28
VLAN103 10.10.12.0/28
VLAN104 10.10.11.0/28
 
I need traffic going from VLAN100 with a destination of 10.10.11.0 forwarded to VLAN101 and NOT VLAN104.
 
This task is currently being completed by a multi context firewall and we're trying to decommission the asset.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4900 - How To Verify Link Before VLAN Extension

Mar 23, 2012

we got a dark fiber betwwen two sites away from each other 30 Km,i need to connect this sites acts as  backup dc to main dc in main site using cisco 4900 Switches in BK-DC anf 6513 in the main site,how can i verfiy if this fiber oparates as L2 and i can extend vlan servers,is it via "sh cdp neigh" and "sh vlan br"?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4900 Failed To Read Transceiver Serial

Jul 30, 2012

When I insert the TwinGig Converter in a Catalyst 4900M you get the following error message: Failed to read transceiver serial eeprom on port Te2/1, try reinserting.This error is probably because the device expects 10Gig transceivers to be connected to the device not 1Gig.I used the TwinGig 4 module and 8 SFP ports are connected. But when i type in the the "hw-module module <slot> port-group <group> select gigabitethernet" the command is not available.  [code]

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Setup TwinGig Converter To Use GLC-SX GBIC In 4900?

Jun 17, 2012

I am having problems configuring a 4900.  I have entered the following commands:
 
hw-module module 2 port-group 1 select gigabitethernet
hw-module module 2 port-group 2 select gigabitethernet
hw-module module 2 port-group 3 select gigabitethernet
hw-module module 2 port-group 4 select gigabitethernet
 
However no matter what I try, it never sees the GLC-SX gbics I have in the TwinGig converter.
 
PERSW001#sh interfaces status mod 2
 Port      Name               Status       Vlan       Duplex  Speed Type
Te2/1                        inactive     1            full    10G No X2
Te2/2                        inactive     1            full    10G No X2
Te2/3                        inactive     1            full    10G No X2

[code]....

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Switching Redundancy For ESXi VMHosts Scenario

May 12, 2013

I have the following devices :
 
-1 VM Host
-2 Layer 3 switches
 
I would like to provide full redundancy for all vlans being used by VM Guests on the VM Host as well as the management vlan being used by the VM Host.I have created two LACP etherchannel connections on the VM Host. Each etherchannel from the host consists of  4 ports spanning a single NIC. One etherchannel connection goes to a trunked etherchannel connection on switch 1, and the other etherchannel connection goes to a trunked etherchannel connection on switch 2.Switch 1 and switch 2 have an etherchannel connection between them that carries all of the vlans in the topology.Vlan 2 is the managment vlan. Vlans 3, 4, and 5 are vlans that VM guest systems will be using for normal data traffic.
 
I intend to use switch 1 as the VRRP active router and spanning-tree root bridge for vlans 2 and 3.I intend to use switch 2 as the VRRP active router and spanning-tree root bridge for vlans 4 and 5.The spanning-tree configuration is using multiple spanning-tree with two instances. Instance 1 has vlans 2 and 3 associated and Instance 2 has vlans 4 and 5 associated. I would like to have this topology be fault tolerant to the point where if one of the etherchannel links between the host and one of the switches goes down, (for example, if switch 1 was powered off) traffic will be automatically redirected through the other functional link. I believe that my VRRP configuration would allow for a fairly quick failover of layer 3 services, but I am not certain that my design will be functional at a layer 2 level.
 
What I am uncertain about is how spanning-tree will converge. I am assuming that the virtual switch on the VM host will not be forwarding any BPDUs being sent by either switch. Would either of the links connecting to the host be considered a redundant link by either switch?Would the link between switch 2 and the host be inactive for all vlans in MST instance 1 during normal operation?Conversely, would the link between switch 1 and the host be inactive for all vlans in MST instance 2 during normal operation? Would all links remain active for ALL vlans? Would this mean that some traffic may travel through switch 2 to reach switch 1 instead of going directly to switch 1?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4900 Capturing VLAN Traffic And Set Destination To GE Ports

Jan 24, 2012

At present we are having a 4900 series switch where we are running one monitor session.Additionaly we are in need of capturing VLAN traffic and set the destination to 2 * GE ports , both are in the same switch.Due to the limitation of two monitor sessions per switch , we thought of putting the destination ports as port channel but it looks like it is not supported.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: STP 6509-E On Vlan 1 In A Heterogeneous Network

Aug 15, 2012

we have an heterogeneous network with Cisco devices (6509-E, 3750G and 3560) and Alcatel 6850 devices. We have to enable a PTP Wifi line as a backup for the fiber line between two buildings. For this purpose, we have connected a wifi device to GigabitEthernet 0/47 of SWIHGJ1 and configured it as: [code]

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - Block All FTP Traffic On Port 21 From Servers In Network

Oct 3, 2012

I am attempting to block all FTP traffic on port 21 from the servers in my network, and only allow FTP from one server to go out.
 
I have created the following ACL
  
access-list 101 Permit ip any any
access-list 101 Permit 21 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 any
access-list 101 Deny 21 any any
 
and have applied it to my truck VPN that goes up to my firewall
 
int Vlanxxx
ip access-group 101 out
 
But when i test ftp is still allowed by all servers.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 To 6509-E Chassis Upgrade?

Nov 21, 2011

I currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:

     x3     48 ports
     x1     NAM
     x2     Sup720
     Running 12.2(18)SXF3
 
I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis?Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Upgrade Of 6509 To 6509-E Chassis

Nov 21, 2011

I currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:

x3     48 ports
x1     NAM
x2     Sup720

Running 12.2(18)SXF3.I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis. Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 / 6509 - Upgrade Core Switch Without Disrupting Network?

Feb 2, 2013

I am planning to upgrade the current core switch(3750) to 6509 series switch. Since we have a production network running we have to plan for an online core switch upgrade.

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Supervisor Redundancy For The 6500?

May 14, 2012

We currently have the following configuration:
 
STB_6509#sho mod
Mod Ports Card Type                              Model              Serial No.
--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ -----------
  1   10  WiSM WLAN Service Module         WS-SVC-WISM-1-K9  
  2   24  CEF720 24 port 1000mb SFP         WS-X6724-SFP      
  5    2  Supervisor Engine 720 (Active)         WS-SUP720-3B      

[code]....
 
I would like to add a redundant supervisor blade to the 6509 that is in production. Can this be done plug and play and require no reload. Are all WS-SUP720-3B the same as far as memory etc... or can I buy any used WS-SUP720-3B and it will work properly.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: ISR 881-SEC-K9 Vs 891-K9 And 2 ISPs Redundancy

Nov 1, 2012

have main office of 70 people.Also I have 2 redundant ISP:One give me 20 mbit/s Other only 2 mbit/s and it is my backup ISP.
 
I have some resources in data center and I need a IPSec VPN to it and some other location. I suppose there will be up to 3-5 IPSec tunnels. I choose Cisco ISR 881-SEC-K9 with one wan port and 4 LAN switch. But know I’m looking for Cisco 891-K9. There is no security bundle for it. But in cisco.com this router is marked Cisco 891-K9 Security router. Does it support security features like VPNs, ZBF, IOS Firewall, NBAR and IP SLA for ISP redundancy? Also if my boss will choose chipper Cisco router 881-SEC-K9. Will I be able to organize 2 ISP redundancy on 4 LAN switch port inside VLAN interfaces because there is only one WAN port?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Supervisor Engine 720 Errors

Apr 18, 2013

i have a standalone SUP720, no traffic is passing through it. only one port connected for remote telnet, its kind of backup device.today i checked its log, and there are some wiered message.is it a software bug or my SUP has gone bad? [code]

View 24 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 What Happens When A Supervisor Fails

Feb 3, 2010

We've been mocking up a test lab to test VSS on two 6500's.  Each 6500 has one sup720 and a 6708-10ge blade and we've established the two 10ge links between the two chassis; the first from the each chassis' sup and the second from each 6708.My question is, what happens when the supervisor fails on one of the chassis?

View 10 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Supervisor 7-E / 7L-E Port Numbering

Jan 30, 2013

How the port numbering would be on Sup 7-E and Sup 7L-E? I mean, on Sup-6E and Sup-6LE, if I used a twin-gig converter, I used ports gi3/3,gi3/4,gi3/5 and Gi3/6 [If the sup is in 3rd Slot]. I know there are now 4 ports on the Sup 7 which can either be used as Gig ports or TenGig ports. So, how will the port numbering change ?

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved