Cisco VPN :: 1841 - L2L Is Up But No Traffic Flowing
Jun 7, 2011
im attempting to setup a L2L VPN between an 1841 and an NSA 2400, via the SDM.The Tunnel comes up, and when I test connectivity it shows as being successful, but I do get an error stating:-
"A ping with data size of this VPN interface MTU size and 'Do not Fragment' bit set to the other end VPN device is failing. This may happen if there is a lesser MTU network which drops the 'Do not fragment' packets."
From my reading this shouldnt cause all traffic to drop though, right?
Currently I cannot ping or telnet to services from one end of the tunnel to the other. I was able to ping momentarily from the Sonicwall end at one point, but this disappeared shortly afterwards (without my changing anything regarding the config).
All of the ACLs created were populated through the SDM.
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jun 3, 2013
I have two 1841's, setting up a Lab WAN in Packet Tracer. I have one of the 1841's run to a DSL modem, then out to the cloud and the same setup on the other end... from the cloud to the DSL modem and to the 1841 on that end... I have all green lights, so that tells me layer 2 is up, but I'm trying to figure out
what IP to assign the routers to test pinging and getting traffic flowing. but the DSL Modem's have the public IP's and dynamically assign an IP to the routers? I've also tried setting up a static IP on the routers fa0/0 interfaces and the pings fail.. Wondering what I am missing to get these two talking.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 27, 2011
I'm currently using ASA 5510 with software 8.4.1 and I have an issue with nat configuration. I used the following config line:nat (inside, dmz) source dynamic LAN Pat1 destination Server1 Server1
The traffic is not flowing and when I use Packet Tracer, packets are dropped at the NAT rule with the following error: Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule.The only ACE I have is permit ip any any.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 12, 2011
I have manually configured the Firewall ASA 5510 from existing PIX to match the configuration, however when I connect the firewall to the Network, no traffic is flowing in either direction. I have the Inside network on the 172.29.0.0 subnet and the outside network on 20.2.0.0 subnet. I am attaching the cofiguration file.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 13, 2013
i have a gateway router going to the internet....using public IP addresses on both interfaces. starting on Monday, traffic would suddenly stop flowing from the inside of the network going out, though i can still ping the outside interface , but when I log in to the router I am able to ping to the internet. so its like traffic is not passing from the outside int to the inside int. I have a 3900 router. other thing is, when i restart the router it will work for some time and then just stop again....
View 6 Replies
View Related
Aug 20, 2012
I've got an ASA 5505 with the Security Plus license that I'm trying to configure.
So far I have setup NATing on two VLANs, one called 16jda (VLAN 16 - 10.16.2.0/24) and one called 16jdc (VLAN 11 - 10.105.11.0/24).
From each subnet I am able to connect to the internet, but I need these subnets to also be able to talk to each other.
I have each VLAN interface at security level 100 and enabled "same-security-traffic permit inter-interface", and I have setup static NAT mappings between the two subnets, but they still can't communicate.
When I try to ping there is no reply and the only log message is: 6 Aug 21 2012 09:00:54 302020 10.16.2.10 23336 10.105.11.6 0 Built inbound ICMP connection for faddr 10.16.2.10/23336 gaddr 10.105.11.6/0 laddr 10.105.11.6/0
View 11 Replies
View Related
Oct 4, 2011
We have 3560 switch with following IOS. version 12.2(55)SE3 and image name is C3560-IPSERVICESK9-M. On one of the interface we need to know what are traffic is flowing.
Do we have "ip nbar or ip route-cache" support on this switch IOS? Is there any other way to find out which protocol traffic is flowing through that interface.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 7, 2012
I have configured multicast(ip pim dense-mode) on two 2911 that are connected by a Multilink( 3 Mbps) Wan connection.The configuration works fine for awhile and sometimes all day but at some point one of the Multilink interfaces stops passing multicast traffic.I perform a SH Multilink 1 on the interfaces and one show multicast packets incrementing and one does not, it just stops.The problem acts like there is a buffer that gets full and after that happens it just stops working.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 16, 2013
We are in the process of rolling out iPads to our offices. As part of this implementation, we need to print from the iPads to our network printers. Our network printers are mostly HP and Xerox and do not have native Apple AirPrint capabilities. As such, we have been using the FingerPrint software to share out the network printers as Apple AirPrint printers. We have a mixture of switches at our offices. Most offices utilize a 3550 PoE switch. In these offices the AirPrint traffic is being transferred successfully and everything works great. In the offices which are using 3560 PoE switches, the traffic is never seen at the iPads. We are using EnGenius EAP300 access points connected into the Cisco switches to provide wireless access to the iPads. Both 3550 and 3560 switches are running iOS 12.2(25). What might be stopping/blocking the AirPrint traffic on the 3560 switches?
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 9, 2012
We have an MPLS that connects our main office with our 7 branch offices. We have 3Mb coming into the main office and 1.5 into all of the branch offices. I would like to give rdp traffic the highest priority. We have a Cisco 1841 at all branches and a Cisco 2811 at the main office. Do I have to configure QOS on all routers or just the one at the main location?
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 2, 2012
I am about to pull my hair out. I have a 1841 router at one end with 3 ASA's for teleworkers working great. I'm connecting a 4th one that I can not get to work for the life of me. The tunnel is comming up, but its not passing any traffic. I don't see any glaring errors in the VPN debug. The router comes up, reverse route injection does its thing... all looks great. Am I totally overlooking somthing? I must have rebuilt this a dozen times.
: ASA Version 8.2(1) !hostname ciscoasa104domain-name default.domain.invalidnames!interface Vlan1nameif insidesecurity-level 100ip address 192.168.104.1 255.255.255.0!interface Vlan2nameif outsidesecurity-level 0ip address dhcp setroute! interface Ethernet0/0switchport access vlan 2!interface Ethernet0/1!interface Ethernet0/2!interface Ethernet0/3!interface Ethernet0/4!interface Ethernet0/5!interface Ethernet0/6!interface Ethernet0/7!boot system disk0:/asa821-k8.binftp mode passivedns server-group DefaultDNSdomain-name default.domain.invalidsame-security-traffic permit inter-interfacesame-security-traffic permit intra-interfaceobject-group network DM_INLINE_NETWORK_1network-object 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0network-object 192.168.4.0 255.255.255.0access-list outside_1_cryptomap extended permit ip 192.168.104.0 255.255.255.0
[code]....
View 7 Replies
View Related
Oct 23, 2012
We are currently experiencing a problem on an IP SEC VPN tunnel that has all of us here completely stumped. We are hoping that one of you experts out there will be able to assist. Here are some basic details:
NETWORKS
An IPSEC site to site tunnel has been built between the two sites on different networks.
PIX 515E - MAIN SITE
Network 172.16.0.0/24
CISCO 1841 - REMOTE SITE
Network 172.16.99.0/24
ISSUE
All traffic flows over the VPN from the 172.16.99.0 network in the direction of the Pix, such as RDP, SIP etc. Pings will go in both directions across the tunnel. Other than the pings most traffic will NOT flow over the tunnel from the 172.16.0.0 network on the pix to the 172.16.99.0 network on the 1841. It would appear that something on the 1841 is blocking traffic coming in over the tunnel from the 172.16.0.0 network as we can not get a wire shark capture on a PC on the 172.16.99.0 network, other than the ICMP traces. Usually this is an access list problem but we have checked and double checked the configuration and can't see anything.
TROUBLESHOOTING SO FAR
1. Have tried inserting various access list changes to the tunnel on the 1841 to make specific reference to the 172.16.0.0 network.
2. Have tried various NAT entries.
3. Have removed and then recreated the VPN tunnel from a fresh start.
4. Have made the MTU 1400 on the inside interfaces on the Pix and the 1841.
The tunnel is fully up at all times and as we say can ping in both directions.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Aug 2, 2012
I am in trouble with my cisco 1841 configuration.The "what I want to" schema: very external IP ( AAA.AAA.AAA.AAA ) in the internet cloud => | cisco 1841 external IP BBB.BBB.BBB.BBB | => internal computer IP CCC.CCC.CCC.CCC
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 1, 2012
I am in trouble with my cisco 1841 configuration. The "what I want to schema":very external IP ( AAA.AAA.AAA.AAA ) in the internet cloud => | cisco 1841 external IP BBB.BBB.BBB.BBB | => internal computer IP CCC.CCC.CCC.CCC
Steps (this what I think should be done):
1. Find all packets from A by acl
2. Route finded packets throught cisco1841 directly to internal ip address
It should be easy but it doesn't.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 6, 2011
I run a network that uses MPLS circuits to connect all of the companies different stores. Internet access is through a Cisco ASA5500 here at the corp headquarters.
To make all of this work, we use a little 1721 gateway router to move traffic as needed. All the clients in our corporate office use 10.10.99.1 (Cisco 1721) as a gateway. The 1721 routes the traffic either to the internet (10.10.99.106 Cisco ASA5500) or the MPLS router (159.61.54.30).
For some reason, anything that runs on Linux (Ubuntu server, ReadyNAS boxes, Thecus NAS) will not pass traffic beyond the 1721 gateway router.
I've poured over the config for that router, and I can't find anything that could be causing this not to work. Thinking that the 1721 was bad, I put an 1841 online in it's place, and it did the same thing. I'm a noob when it comes to Cisco configs, but am learning as I go along.
Ive attached a txt file of the 1721 config.
View 31 Replies
View Related
Apr 10, 2011
i am having 2 locations & having cisco 1841 & 2821 at both the end connected via a P2P link. Now when i trace location A from location B, the traffic is getting dropped at location A's Vlan HSRP IP address.there is no ACL in that Vlan, but still it is getting dropped.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 29, 2011
Is RTP port open indicates that rtp is flowing in the network.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 28, 2011
using task manager in XP it is clear that while browsing data is being uploaded mirroring the data downloaded..ie in a given period if 18mB comes downstream (just surfing) then 11mB goes upstream. The graph in task manager shows that the peaks and troughs of the data upstream and downstream exactly correspond and watching the bytes tick over confirms that data goes out for every data coming in.I assume that this should not happen? I realise ip protocols have some kind of error detection that may require uploading data, but the amount sent seems excessive! From my limited understanding of networking and running wireshark it looks like that when packets come from an ip on the web ( i use the terms web/internet interchangeably ) then packets are sent out to the same ip ... using TCP and HTTP ( I don't really understand them ). The info for one such packet going out is "Continuation or non-HTTP traffic" using the HTTP protocol, which sounds a bit contradictory. I regularly run virus scans and rarely find anything. The cpu regularly maxes out and its usually something to do with firefox ( I've heard of buffer overflows but i assume the problem is a relatively old processor and hardware).The browser is firefox. OS is XP.Coincidentally, the pc was recently rebooting after crashing until I disabled "restart on system failure" which prevented the crashes ( if they were crashes and not just the system reacting to an error ). Again, that is a bit suspicious but maybe not. Spybot, bit defender quickscan,avira, zone alarm, malwarebytes etc haven't flagged anything up.Maybe the router is not configured properly. As with all these things, there will be some simpler things to start with to diagnose this issue (if there is one ) but I don't know what they are.The pc uses wifi to connect. The isp is not the best and the speed is pretty bad for adsl. Every couple of days the router needs rebooting because it stops giving out ip's.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 28, 2012
Using the Cisco Configuration Professional software I have created a site to site VPN connection (between a cisco 1841 and 1811).The tunnel appears to be up as far as the routers are concerned, but I am unable to ping anything on the remote networks. I thought route maps may have had something to do with this but I cant see what is worng with them.Just so you know, the 1841 device already has a functioning VPN tunnel to another site. The peers I am concerned about are 141.0.59.x and 109.238.78.x.
View 12 Replies
View Related
Dec 11, 2010
We have cisoc 2821 at one of branch and created five sub inetrfaces for different vlans.Output of Show interface shows very frequent increase in the input error count.I have changed the physical cable and switch port on the other side.But still error rate is increasing.When the traffic is less error rate is low but with high traffic it is increasing drastically.My router process is very less(4%) only.What could be possible reason. [code]
View 8 Replies
View Related
Mar 10, 2011
We are looking to implement traffic shaping/policing primarily for P2P traffic. As natively the ASA5550 is only capable of p2p inspection if the traffic is tunneled via port 80 is the AIP-SSM the way forward? We have 2 5550s in active/active failover config. As a side note we are also looking to implement an IDS/IPS system so could this module cover all?Is this module going to provide the desired outcome or is there another module/device out there better suited for this? I would prefer to use the ASA5550s as opposed to implementing another product if only that we can make use of the investment we already made on these devices.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 27, 2012
I am testing limit bandwith using my ASA 8.2, i am trying to limit internet access for certains users , i order to save Bandwith for the important things but i can´t get any limitation
My configuration is the following, the acces list is just for my pc in order to test, and the service policy is applied to outside interface (called internet in my case) for incoming traffic
access-list Internet_mpc_1 extended permit ip host 172.16.127.70 any class-map Internet-class-TEST match access-list Internet_mpc_1 policy-map Internet-policy-web class Internet-class-TEST police output 1024000 1500
service-policy Internet-policy-web interface Internet
With show service policy i can´t see any activity on the policy , but if i do a similar configuration for inside interface outgoing traffic i can see packets allowed and dropped
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 29, 2012
I have an ASA 5520 with the below config
Gi0/0: outside (Internet)
Gi0/1: inside (Internal users)
Gi0/2: DMZ (web servers, ftp, Mail etc..)
I have a SMTP relay deployed on the DMZ for mailing. I have also a mail servers installed in the internal lan,
I want to allow trafic from dmz to reach internal lan, and i want normally also allow stmp relay from dmz to reach Internet.
How can i block trafic from DMZ to reach Internal Lan (instead of smtp) if the to allow trafic from dmz to internet i must put ANY in the policy?
For allowing trafic from DMZ to reach Internet, the policy must be DMZ -----> ANY ----->Services., this policy means DMZ can implicity reach Internal Lan?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 19, 2013
We have a Cisco 2811 running ITP IOS. On that router we run the SMPP service. A client on the network connects to this service, and we need to capture the traffic for debug.
I've tried traffic-export, but I cannot see any outbound traffic.I'm guessing that this is due to the fact that the outbound SMPP traffic is not transit traffic as it is generated by the router itself.
Is there any way to capture the outbound traffic?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 4, 2011
I am trying to come up with the best way to traffic shape traffic with 3750 Me switches. the traffic will be coming from a 6504 Sup-7203b downstream and going out the wan. Core---L3---->6504--intvlan80--trunkport to--->3750Me---g/1/1/1-trunkport to---MetroE network--->int f0/0.80--branch router. The idea is to use the 3750 to traffic shape the traffic going towards the wan/branch to 500 to match the contracted rate and then to use qos on shaped rate. I tried to apply it to g1/1/1 using port based policies but it did not shape the traffic. I changed everything to IP interfaces and it worked. I need to break up the metroe into different vlans so I can bring branch offices in on different vlans.c
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 1, 2013
I am putting an pre-labbed DMVPN Hub config onto a production 1841. We had to upgrade the IOS to support protection with NAT so the current IOS we're running is c1841-adventerprisek9-mz.124-25g.bin.I can paste the configuration in fine (via the tunnel interfaces) and the router accepts it however the 'show dmvpn', 'debug dmvpn' and other related commands don't work. I have checked the IOS feature navigator and it definitely shows that DMVPN phase 1 and 2 are supported in this image.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 17, 2012
I have a 1841 router and I can ping the f/0 port from my pc. However when i try to console to it, it is not showing up anything but a blinking cursor. I tried all different baud rates on my teraterm but still not luck. I picked the baud rate disconnected and reconnected everytime and still nothing. Then I tried to telnet to it using teraterm but it would just open a console window and then close.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Apr 28, 2013
a have a router CISCO 1841 and I configured a NAT inside from the router to the firewall like this :ip nat inside source static firewall_adresse public_adresse and its work fine and when a added it I do this command "wr" to save the configuration and I restarted the router many times and it still work fine,but in the last five months this NAT does not exsit twice and I must add it a gain.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Nov 23, 2011
How to enable GUI for a Cisco 1841?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 12, 2012
I have a cisco 1841 router and want to run BFD i think it needs IOS 12.4T..It has currently 12.4 but no T does the "T" IOS have mroe features?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 23, 2011
How to enable GUI for a Cisco 1841?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 23, 2013
We have a 1841 setup with WAN and LAN subinterfaced(2 WAN connections, 1 internal VLANs) and I am recieving some pretty horrible throughput when traversing the router to the WAN.
I am receiving about 2 MBPS down but around 5 up.Currently there is a ACL on the WAN interface, and as well we are running NAT NVI. It is possible that this might have something to do with it, but I am not sure.
Most of the CPU is going to IP input however I cannot seem to determine the cause. One thing I am thinking is the overload for NVI is using a route-map. Could that cause it to process switch instead of fast/CEF switch?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 25, 2011
i have 6 sites using tandberg visioconference system, each site have a cisco router 1841 configured with ipsec vpn, i have a 4 conference a week and my bandwidth is 2 meg, and when people are working we have a lot of problems and cut in our visio conference.
I have a big problem, i want to make a high level QOS priority to my TANDBERG visio conference system between my sites, the issues is that there is an IPSEC VPN in my cisco routers between those sites and as i know if the traffic is crypted we can not separate the packets or give higher priority to packets over anothers.
can i mark traffic in the lan interface and and make a high priority befors the packets go through the ipsec tunnel?
View 1 Replies
View Related
