im trying to configure IpSEC over Gre tunnel, but the traffic pass unencrypted, i cant find why this is happening. Here are the confg of the two routers (1841)
OFICINA#sh run br
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 1281 bytes
!
version 12.4
service timestamps debug datetime msec
[Code].....
We are currently experiencing a problem on an IP SEC VPN tunnel that has all of us here completely stumped. We are hoping that one of you experts out there will be able to assist. Here are some basic details:
NETWORKS
An IPSEC site to site tunnel has been built between the two sites on different networks.
PIX 515E - MAIN SITE
Network 172.16.0.0/24
CISCO 1841 - REMOTE SITE
Network 172.16.99.0/24
ISSUE
All traffic flows over the VPN from the 172.16.99.0 network in the direction of the Pix, such as RDP, SIP etc. Pings will go in both directions across the tunnel. Other than the pings most traffic will NOT flow over the tunnel from the 172.16.0.0 network on the pix to the 172.16.99.0 network on the 1841. It would appear that something on the 1841 is blocking traffic coming in over the tunnel from the 172.16.0.0 network as we can not get a wire shark capture on a PC on the 172.16.99.0 network, other than the ICMP traces. Usually this is an access list problem but we have checked and double checked the configuration and can't see anything.
TROUBLESHOOTING SO FAR
1. Have tried inserting various access list changes to the tunnel on the 1841 to make specific reference to the 172.16.0.0 network.
2. Have tried various NAT entries.
3. Have removed and then recreated the VPN tunnel from a fresh start.
4. Have made the MTU 1400 on the inside interfaces on the Pix and the 1841.
The tunnel is fully up at all times and as we say can ping in both directions.
I have a 1841 router connected to an ISP (currently SDSL EFM 10Mbps through an ISP modem, the router and the model are connected with a FastEthernet interface). On another location I have a linux server.There is an ipsec tunnel (3des-sha esp) between the router and the linux server (actually done with a crypto mac).The router has a hierarchical QOS policy on the egress interface.When sending traffic from the network inside the router to the linux host without the ipsec tunnel, everything is working fine and throughput is correct.When sending traffic from the inside network to the linux host internal ip through the ipsec tunnel, some packets are lost and the traffic throughput decrease.When sending traffic through the tunnel in the reverse direction (from the linux host to the internal network), everything is fine.I looked at the QOS statistics and the dropped packets counters don't increase. I looked at the egress/ingress interface statistics and no packets dropped there.I lowered the MTU on the egress interface, but it didn't solve the problem. I played by sending various ping icmp packets size, but even small packets are sometimes lost.I tried to check the router CPU, but it seems relatively fine (<= 10%)I captured the traffic on both side, and I see the packets emitted, and then I can see that some of the esp packets of the corresponding side are not received, so it looks like the cisco router is the culprit. This 1841 router is running: 1841 Software (C1841-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.4(24)T4,How can I troubleshoot where and why those packets are lost?
View 0 Replies View RelatedI have a strange issue where im able to get an ipsec tunnel from tha cisco 1841 to a linksys/cisco RV016 for about a minute and ping/encrypt packets across the lin for about a minute before it goes down. I tried various configuration and it all results in the tunnel coming up for a minute then going down. I'm not sure if im hitting a bug and on which decide of if im doing something wrong.
RV016 firmware 2.0.18
cisco 1841: C1841-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 12.4(24)T
my config
no crypto isakmp default policy
!
crypto isakmp policy 1
encr 3des
hash md5
authentication pre-share
group 2
[code]....
I'm in process of purchasing a new Cisco routers for our branches that will be used primary to enable IPSec virtual tunnel interfce with "tunnel mode ipsec ipv4". does the default IOS IP Base supports this feature? or i need to purchase DATA license or SECURITY license?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am using a Cisco RV110W (Firmware 1.2.09) in a branch and I would like to create a VPN Tunnel to another site that has a Cisco RV042 (firmware v4.2.1.02)
What would be the correct Configuration? the current configuration I am using is
in the RV042 i am using
Check Enable
Local Group Setup
Local Security Gateway Type : IP Only
IP Address : RV042 Pulbic IP address
[Code].....
i have 6 sites using tandberg visioconference system, each site have a cisco router 1841 configured with ipsec vpn, i have a 4 conference a week and my bandwidth is 2 meg, and when people are working we have a lot of problems and cut in our visio conference.
I have a big problem, i want to make a high level QOS priority to my TANDBERG visio conference system between my sites, the issues is that there is an IPSEC VPN in my cisco routers between those sites and as i know if the traffic is crypted we can not separate the packets or give higher priority to packets over anothers.
can i mark traffic in the lan interface and and make a high priority befors the packets go through the ipsec tunnel?
I have created the tunnel interface on cisco 1841 router. The tunnel is up but can't ping to it's interface ip, the ping drops.
R1#show ip int brief
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
Tunnel10 10.10.10.1 YES manual up up
[Code]......
We have configure a L2L vpn between Asa and 1841 router. We are facing this issue.The tunnel is not getting up from the 1841 site never. When we are trying to generate traffic from the ASA site the tunnel is up and we can see decryps and encryps packets.
Router 1841 Config:
crypto isakmp policy 100
encr 3des
hash md5
authentication pre-share
group 2
crypto isakmp key * address 213.249.XX.XX
[code].....
I m trying to make the vpn session using m GRE tunnel between cisco 891/k9 and 1841 router.. there is the fixed ip add with the 1841 router, and another one doesnt have the static ip from the ISP, In this case, im going to use DMVPN, The problem is , after completing the configuration, the tunnel inteface of the 1841 router will be seen like this.
-status: reset
-protocol: down
I want to establish VPN with GRE over IPsec. As ASA can't end GRE tunnels, I should pass it through inside to another 1841 router in datacentar network. Since datacentar is connected to internet via two wan links (separate ISPs) is it possible to establish two gre simultanous sessions between 1841 at branch office and 1841 at datacentar, one session per wan link at datacentar? That way, I need 8 gre separate sessions (tunnels) at datacentar 1841 router. Is it supported?Is GRE passthrough works like regular port forwarding or it is something that ASA handles with some special commands?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI need to work with the full tunnel feature of the IOS SSL VPN using a Cisco 1841. Here is what I see...
-I login to the portal page and click the "Start" button for "Tunnel Connection (SVC)"
-Security Alert message "This page requires a secure connection which includes server authentication. The Certificate Issuer for this site is untrusted or unknown. Do you wish to proceed?" I click yes.
-Anyconnect says "Please wait while VPN connection is established"
-Anyconnect error "The certificate on the secure gateway is invalid. The VPN connect will not establish"
I am now having trouble to buil a vpn ipsec on an adsl link, my architecture is as follow:
[code]...
whith this output, debbuging seems very difficult. see attached my configuration on router 1841
I need support regarding IPSEC - VPN in 1841 Router? I had purchsed 1841 Router and i dont know how to check, whether supported for VPN or not?
View 4 Replies View RelatedWe have set up a site to site IPSEC VPN between a Pix 515E running 8.0 (4) and an 1841 using static IP addresses at both ends. We used CCP on the router and ASDM on the pix to build the initial tunnels. Now the site with the router is changing to a Dynamic IP address from the ISP so we have set up Dynamic DNS to update the dynamic IP address.
The problem we have is that ASDM will not allow us to set a domain as the peer address, it will only accept an IP address. We think the solution will be to remove the static Crypto Map and replace with a Dynamic Crypto map on the Pix side. Our questions are simply; is this the best solution? can we edit the original static list or is it better to delete and make a new dynamic crypto map? Is there a short cut to change the config in command line? This is a live network so just want to check before we make changes on live kit.
I have a data center with virtual desktops and other shared infrastructure serving remote sites, some of which are connected to the data center with GRE over IPsec.
IP address management including DHCP is centralized in my architecture, but I simply cannot figure out how to relay DHCP requests through GRE over IPsec to my DHCP server cluster. I am working with Cisco 800 series VPN peers, and the VPNs are terminated either on a 1841 or a Juniper SRX. Everything else is just fine and dandy, but DHCP is not forwarded across the GRE tunnel.
As a workaround I am forced to use local DHCP pools on the VPN peers, which is extra work from a management point of view, and also precludes static IP address assignment where a local DHCP pool is in a VRF. My LAN devices are mostly thin clients, so I don't care if DHCP stops working when the WAN link fails. As such local pools have no upsides, they are only a tremendous hassle.
My config is very basic, public WAN in global routing table and WAN + GRE tunnel in a VRF. NAT is not used. Here are the DHCP-related configs I have tried:ip helper-address on the LAN gateway, both with and without ip forward-protocol udp bootpcip dhcp pool with relay options configured
In every case, I can see the UDP broadcasts hit the LAN gateway, but relayed packets never arrive at the other GRE tunnel endpoint let alone the DHCP server.
- Ipsec tunnell between two 881's
- An Aruba access point trying to set up a tunnell back to controller through the ipsec tunnell, on udp 4500
- Even though traffic shouldn't be NAT'ed (and other traffic is not), udp 4500 is NAT'ed
I guess this might be default behaviour, thing is that it used to work when it was set up as a route based easy vpn.
I can ping across the tunnel from the pc's on either end of the tunnel, but I can't ping across the tunnel from the routers. If i ping using the source command using the LAN interface, the ping is successfull.
The reason i need this is for the remote router to be able to lookup the head office server for dns wins and ldap.
Network Setup
===========
2 Site to Site VPN tunnels has been established, it is a hub and spoke topology. The hub is ASA5520 and the 2 spoke are a 1841 and 1801 router. The tunnel is able to pass traffic, it's a full tunnel VPN.The tunnel randomly disconnect for no reason. When I check the logs I can see some errors :
%CRYPTO-4-RECVD_PKT_INV_SPI: decaps: rec'd IPSEC packet has invalid spi for destaddr=x.x.x.x, prot=50, spi=0x5F822579(1602364793), srcaddr=y.y.y.y
%CRYPTO-4-IKMP_NO_SA: IKE message from y.y.y.y has no SA and is not an initialization offer
The actual address have been replace by x.x.x.x and y.y.y.y. I frequently have to peform clear crypto isakmp on the spoke routers to revive the VPN tunnels. Is there a way the tunnel can be re-establish again without manual intervention?This keep happening on a random basis and I have living with it for years. I have looked at cisco website troubleshooting tips and but no luck in finding out how to resolve it.
Below is my config on one of the spoke router:
==================================
Cisco IOS Software, C180X Software (C180X-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.4(24)T3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
crypto isakmp policy 10encr 3deshash md5authentication pre-sharegroup 2crypto isakmp key @@@@@@ address y.y.y.ycrypto isakmp invalid-spi-recoverycrypto isakmp keepalive 30 periodiccrypto isakmp nat keepalive 20!!crypto ipsec transform-set tset1 esp-3des esp-md5-hmaccrypto ipsec df-bit clear!crypto map ipsecvpn 10 ipsec-isakmp
set peer y.y.y.yset transform-set tset1match address vpn@spoke!archivelog config hidekeys!!!!!interface FastEthernet0ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.248ip nat outsideip virtual-reassemblyduplex autospeed autocrypto map ipsecvpn!interface FastEthernet1!interface FastEthernet2!interface FastEthernet3!interface FastEthernet4!interface FastEthernet5!interface
[code]....
I have 3 sites. Each site has a Cisco 1841 as its WAN router with a 10Mb direct internet access circuit connected to Fa0/0. The sites are then connected to each other via site-to-site IPSEC VPN. (The LAN switches in use at each site are Cisco 3750 series) [code]
Now, Site A has already been set-up with VoIP telephony. The plan is to extend this to the other 2 offices.Auto QoS has been set-up on the switches and data and voice VLANs created in the same way for each office.
how should/do we extend the QoS for the voice over the WAN to ensure voice quality remains for site to site calls. And what special considerations do we have to make for it being IPSEC VPN connectivity between the sites? The actual IP telephony system itself is being set-up by a 3rd party and not a lot of information on their requirements has been forthcoming so far – essentially all we have really been told is that they would like us to “reserve” a certain amount of bandwidth for the voice traffic between each site.
Any good vpn config for a router to allow vpn connections from Android phones using L2TP-IPSEC? Router is an 1841 running most current IOS ver 15.1.
View 1 Replies View Relatedhow to create ip sec tunnel using these parameters. customer ip where tunnel has to be connected 1.1.1.1
ISAKMP Parameters: (Phase I)
Encryption: AES-256 or 3DES
Authentication Mode: Pre-shared key
[Code]......
We have a Cisco 2820 that serves as a hub and our spokes are Cisco 871s. Its been working for a while and for some reason last week. Http and https traffic over the tunnel is having connection issues. I can Remote desktop or PCanywhere into the remote PCs. From that PC I can ping internal IP address or IP of the webmail server or internal webserver with no issue. But if I access it over the browser it times out or it will work and stop working again. Basically ica, icmp, pcanythere, rdp traffic works over the tunnel but not http or https.
View 2 Replies View Relatedcan I force an IPSEC L2L tunnel to use NAT-T encapsulation no matter what? Automatic detection says none of the endpoints are behind NAT. I know I can disable it by the "crypto map XXX set nat-t-disable" command, but I want the exact opposite.
I have a very strange issue where asynchronos routing is making my life as a technician very hard.
A side question; Can I do something about an ISP that is policy-base-routing its ESP traffic (and/or translating it)?
ASA5505 ===>===>===> ISAKMP traffic ===>===>===> ASA5510
212.178.155.73 80.62.yyy.xxx (traffic source IP: 212.178.155.73)
[Code].....
i am curently troubleshooting a ipsec l2l VPN between
1. ASA 7.2(4) to SSG-140
2. Cisco 871W to SSG-140
In both scenario's the tunnel is nicely established, and traffic goes into the tunnel, but nothing comes out. All encap's, but no decap's
It seems like a routing issue, but we can not find anything on both sites.
So maybe i m running into a (known) issue between cisco VPN equipment and the SSG-140?
Could it be a proxy-id issue? Cause they configure stuff like 10.1.1.0/24 and i configure 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255
I'm attempting to configure a tunnel on a PIX-501 version 6.3. It's an old device that's due to be replaced soon, but unfortunately we need a tunnel now... I have been using this document as a reference (6211): URL ,The remote end is a sonicwall.
The problem seems to be that the pix never sees the interesting traffic for the tunnel, and never tries to initiate a connection. I have enabled crypto ipsec and crypto isakmp debugs, but no data is ever displayed, even when attempting to access a device on the remote side of the tunnel! Someone had tried to set up this device with some tunnels in the past, but was never successful, so I'm thinking there might be remaining commands in the running-config causing problems.
configuring some static NAT entries on a remote site 887 router which also has a IPSec tunnel configured back to our main office.
I have been asked to configure some mobile phone "boost" boxes, which will take a mobile phone and send the traffic over the Internet - this is required because of the poor signal at the branch. These boxes connect via Ethernet to the local network and need a direct connection to the Internet and also certain UDP and TCP ports opening up.
There is only one local subnet on site and the ACL for the crypto map dictates that all traffic from this network to our head office go over the tunnel. What I wanted to do was create another vlan, give this a different subnet. Assign these mobile boost boxes DHCP reservations (there is no interface to them so they cannot be configured) and then allow them to break out to the Internet locally rather than send the traffic back to our head office and have to open up ports on our main ASA firewall.
[URL]
So I went ahead and created a separate vlan and DHCP reservation and then also followed the guidelines outlined above about using a route-map to stop the traffic being sent down the tunnel and then configured static NAT statements for each of the four ports these boost boxes need to work. I configure the ip nat inside/outside on the relevant ports (vlan 3 for inside, dialer 1 for outside) The configuration can be seen below for the NAT part;
! Denies vpn interesting traffic but permits all otherip access-list extended NAT-Trafficdeny ip 172.19.191.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.0.0 0.3.255.255deny ip 172.19.191.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255deny ip 172.19.191.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.128.0
[Code].....
I have an GRE Tunnel across my head office and remote site with multiple subnets using cisco 1841 routers.I can ping most of the devices on the remote side, but I can not ping certain devices.These devices respond to ping requests on the local LAN, but not through the WAN link. If I change the IP of device than it start responding. I am using same gateway and mask on these devices.The remote site is running classic STP on switches with distribution switch being the root bridge.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a setup where a spoke (cisco 1841) is sending a multicast feed to a hub (cisco 2951) via a DMVPN tunnel on the Internet. The feed arrives on interface fa0/0 of the cisco 1841 and is forwarded to the tunnel interface. It is about 160,000 kbit/s and 18 pps. This always looks the same:
cisco2951-1-hub#sh run int tu10
!
interface Tunnel10
description DMVPN TUNNEL
[Code]...
I am exploring the possibility of having Cisco 1841's (or higher) at multiple sites. Each router will support 2 x ADSL connections (HWIC-1ADSL cards). My plan is to set up a DMVPN Full Mesh Tunnel on the first ADSL interface on each router and have RIP route these subnets, this will be for my Voice traffic only.
Further more I would like to set up a second IPSEC VPN tunnel between the head site and all other sites (the sites do not require direct communication for data purposes). This will route via static/weighted routes.
Any similar set up or sample configurations?
whether or not you can also run parallel DMVPN full mesh tunnels on a Cisco 1841 as this would be the other option.
the only restrictions are that the ADSL links cannot be upgraded to SHDSL etc.
I'm troubleshooting an issue with a new site-to-site vpn setup between 1800 series routers. The tunnel is up but not encrypting traffic on one router, when IP CEF is disabled traffic is encrypted and decrypted!
View 1 Replies View RelatedI've been troubleshooting this issue and was hoping to get some more feed back and maybe point out an error if I'm not seeing it. I recently setup a remote access VPN on Cisco ASA 5505. Everything appeared to work at first and the IPsec client connect. However if you look at the packets being encrypted an decrypted on the Client side only the encrypted counter is incrementing and the decrypted stays at 0. The opposite is true on the ASA side the decrypted continures to increment and the encrypted stays at zero. My first thought was maybe a mis configured NAT 0 statement or not defining the correct Split tunnel ACL but I have verified that. The asa version 8.2(5), I'll also list a packet-tracer I did from an inside host to VPN IP. [code]
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have been struggling for a few days with getting site-to-site traffic working across a L2L IPSec tunnel. At this point, I have the tunnel up, and I see packets being decrypted on the correct IPSec SA's when I ping from a local network computer on the ASA side to a local network computer on the router side. I cannot ping from one side to the other, but those packets are getting through. We have another L2L tunnel that is from that ASA to another remote site's ASA, and that is functional. I have mirrored the configuration for ACLs, etc. from that site, so I believe that the issue is with the packets getting incorrectly translated by the NAT/NONAT statements/ACLs on the router side.
View 8 Replies View Related