Cisco WAN :: DMVPN Full-Mesh And Separate IPSEC VPN On 1841?
Feb 2, 2011
I am exploring the possibility of having Cisco 1841's (or higher) at multiple sites. Each router will support 2 x ADSL connections (HWIC-1ADSL cards). My plan is to set up a DMVPN Full Mesh Tunnel on the first ADSL interface on each router and have RIP route these subnets, this will be for my Voice traffic only.
Further more I would like to set up a second IPSEC VPN tunnel between the head site and all other sites (the sites do not require direct communication for data purposes). This will route via static/weighted routes.
Any similar set up or sample configurations?
whether or not you can also run parallel DMVPN full mesh tunnels on a Cisco 1841 as this would be the other option.
the only restrictions are that the ADSL links cannot be upgraded to SHDSL etc.
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Mar 21, 2013
I have a setup where a spoke (cisco 1841) is sending a multicast feed to a hub (cisco 2951) via a DMVPN tunnel on the Internet. The feed arrives on interface fa0/0 of the cisco 1841 and is forwarded to the tunnel interface. It is about 160,000 kbit/s and 18 pps. This always looks the same:
cisco2951-1-hub#sh run int tu10
!
interface Tunnel10
description DMVPN TUNNEL
[Code]...
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 25, 2011
I have a Dual-Hub DMVPN with PKI dep[oyment infrastructure and with 2 Hub on Cisco 1811 and Spokes on Cisco 1841. When I enter the 'subject-name' parameter (pki trustpoint configuration mode) on a Spoke routers, one of two Tunnel is up, but the second Tunnel is not up. ISAKMP-negotiation select the rsa-sig-mode is correctly. If I select pre-shared-mode or if i remove 'subject-name' from Spokes, DMVPN work is fine!
In what there can be a problem?
Configuration example:
1. HUB:
crypto pki trustpoint TRUSTPOINT-CA1
enrollment mode ra
enrollment url http://.../certsrv/mscep/mscep.dll
password ...
[ code]....
View 17 Replies
View Related
Apr 16, 2011
We have 7606 router without any ipsec module on it,so i check the ios and it has all commands in interface tunnel for configuring the dmvpn multipoint tunnel and also protection profile for ipsec! so i have this question: do we can run dmvpn between this router and our wan routers wich are 3845.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 30, 2011
setting up IPsec for a DMVPN between a 2811 and 2951s in a test lab. I have enabled IPsec on the hub (2811) but I am unable to do so on either of the 2951s. After researching, it seems that I may have the incorrect IOS for this, but I am at a loss which IOS I should be using. Currently the 2951s are on "c2951-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-2.T2.bin" and the only crypto options are(config)#crypto ?
ca Certification authority
key Long term key operations
pki Public Key components
while on the 2811 I get:
WIN-T(config)#crypto ?
ca Certification authority
call Configure Crypto Call Admission Control
ctcp Configure cTCP encapsulation
dynamic-map Specify a dynamic crypto map template
engine Enter a crypto engine configurable menu
gdoi Configure GDOI policy
[code]...
These are all hand me downs?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 17, 2012
I need to work with the full tunnel feature of the IOS SSL VPN using a Cisco 1841. Here is what I see...
-I login to the portal page and click the "Start" button for "Tunnel Connection (SVC)"
-Security Alert message "This page requires a secure connection which includes server authentication. The Certificate Issuer for this site is untrusted or unknown. Do you wish to proceed?" I click yes.
-Anyconnect says "Please wait while VPN connection is established"
-Anyconnect error "The certificate on the secure gateway is invalid. The VPN connect will not establish"
View 10 Replies
View Related
Dec 28, 2011
Our bank is required to do disaster recovery testing. We are doing this offsite at one of our director's businesses. His setup is as follows: His ISP is Time Warner which provided him with a wall unit and a switch He has a Cisco 1841 router out from the Time Warner switch and then down to his internal network, so TW wall unit --> TW switch --> Cisco 1841 --> internal network.The IPs provided to them from TW are 74.219.xxx.1-254 We are trying to use the external address of 74.219.xxx.222, which his business is not currently using internally The Cisco 1841 router holds and NATs all of these addresses currently. We have a Cisco 800 series that is a dedicated router that needs an unused external static IP setup separate from their network. We were trying to plug into their Cisco 1841 and give the 800 series an internal address of 192.168.xxx.222. This will not work for our bank's core processing data center. It has to be out of the TW switch and have an address of the 74.219.xxx.222.
We tried plugging into the TW switch and making the 800 series router parallel to the 1841 router. Communication is not functioning when set up this way. This was tried on a laptop before using the 800 series router. Is there a way to pass through the 74.219.xxx.222 address internally through the Cisco 1841 so we can connect the 800 series directly to this address and the 1841 doesn't use or NAT it in any way?
We had contacted TW support and they made it sound like we would have to block out some addresses and resubnet our director's network. This probably will not be an option. Basically we need to pass the 74.219.xxx.222 addresses internally and have the Cisco 1841 pretend not to see it at all.So we would like to have 74.219.xxx.1-254 into the TW wall unit --> TW switch --> Cisco 1841 --> all 74. addresses resolved to 192.168.xxx.1-254 to internal EXCEPT 74.219.xxx.222 which would pass through to the Cisco 800 series router.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 12, 2013
I'm having trouble setting up a second IPSec VPN tunnel on my Cisco ASA 5505 to another office. I was able to setup the first one with no problem through the ASDM, but have not been able to get the second one up.The IPSec tunnel is connecting to a WRVS4400N router at the other office. I tried debugging crypto isakmp, and crypto ipsec, but I'm getting nothing. Below is the config. Does something look wrong on my end? I also attached a screenshot of the parameters setup on the remote router.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Mar 25, 2011
i have 6 sites using tandberg visioconference system, each site have a cisco router 1841 configured with ipsec vpn, i have a 4 conference a week and my bandwidth is 2 meg, and when people are working we have a lot of problems and cut in our visio conference.
I have a big problem, i want to make a high level QOS priority to my TANDBERG visio conference system between my sites, the issues is that there is an IPSEC VPN in my cisco routers between those sites and as i know if the traffic is crypted we can not separate the packets or give higher priority to packets over anothers.
can i mark traffic in the lan interface and and make a high priority befors the packets go through the ipsec tunnel?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 20, 2011
I want to establish VPN with GRE over IPsec. As ASA can't end GRE tunnels, I should pass it through inside to another 1841 router in datacentar network. Since datacentar is connected to internet via two wan links (separate ISPs) is it possible to establish two gre simultanous sessions between 1841 at branch office and 1841 at datacentar, one session per wan link at datacentar? That way, I need 8 gre separate sessions (tunnels) at datacentar 1841 router. Is it supported?Is GRE passthrough works like regular port forwarding or it is something that ASA handles with some special commands?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 28, 2012
I am now having trouble to buil a vpn ipsec on an adsl link, my architecture is as follow:
[code]...
whith this output, debbuging seems very difficult. see attached my configuration on router 1841
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 10, 2011
I need support regarding IPSEC - VPN in 1841 Router? I had purchsed 1841 Router and i dont know how to check, whether supported for VPN or not?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 4, 2012
We have set up a site to site IPSEC VPN between a Pix 515E running 8.0 (4) and an 1841 using static IP addresses at both ends. We used CCP on the router and ASDM on the pix to build the initial tunnels. Now the site with the router is changing to a Dynamic IP address from the ISP so we have set up Dynamic DNS to update the dynamic IP address.
The problem we have is that ASDM will not allow us to set a domain as the peer address, it will only accept an IP address. We think the solution will be to remove the static Crypto Map and replace with a Dynamic Crypto map on the Pix side. Our questions are simply; is this the best solution? can we edit the original static list or is it better to delete and make a new dynamic crypto map? Is there a short cut to change the config in command line? This is a live network so just want to check before we make changes on live kit.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 17, 2011
I have a data center with virtual desktops and other shared infrastructure serving remote sites, some of which are connected to the data center with GRE over IPsec.
IP address management including DHCP is centralized in my architecture, but I simply cannot figure out how to relay DHCP requests through GRE over IPsec to my DHCP server cluster. I am working with Cisco 800 series VPN peers, and the VPNs are terminated either on a 1841 or a Juniper SRX. Everything else is just fine and dandy, but DHCP is not forwarded across the GRE tunnel.
As a workaround I am forced to use local DHCP pools on the VPN peers, which is extra work from a management point of view, and also precludes static IP address assignment where a local DHCP pool is in a VRF. My LAN devices are mostly thin clients, so I don't care if DHCP stops working when the WAN link fails. As such local pools have no upsides, they are only a tremendous hassle.
My config is very basic, public WAN in global routing table and WAN + GRE tunnel in a VRF. NAT is not used. Here are the DHCP-related configs I have tried:ip helper-address on the LAN gateway, both with and without ip forward-protocol udp bootpcip dhcp pool with relay options configured
In every case, I can see the UDP broadcasts hit the LAN gateway, but relayed packets never arrive at the other GRE tunnel endpoint let alone the DHCP server.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 23, 2012
We are currently experiencing a problem on an IP SEC VPN tunnel that has all of us here completely stumped. We are hoping that one of you experts out there will be able to assist. Here are some basic details:
NETWORKS
An IPSEC site to site tunnel has been built between the two sites on different networks.
PIX 515E - MAIN SITE
Network 172.16.0.0/24
CISCO 1841 - REMOTE SITE
Network 172.16.99.0/24
ISSUE
All traffic flows over the VPN from the 172.16.99.0 network in the direction of the Pix, such as RDP, SIP etc. Pings will go in both directions across the tunnel. Other than the pings most traffic will NOT flow over the tunnel from the 172.16.0.0 network on the pix to the 172.16.99.0 network on the 1841. It would appear that something on the 1841 is blocking traffic coming in over the tunnel from the 172.16.0.0 network as we can not get a wire shark capture on a PC on the 172.16.99.0 network, other than the ICMP traces. Usually this is an access list problem but we have checked and double checked the configuration and can't see anything.
TROUBLESHOOTING SO FAR
1. Have tried inserting various access list changes to the tunnel on the 1841 to make specific reference to the 172.16.0.0 network.
2. Have tried various NAT entries.
3. Have removed and then recreated the VPN tunnel from a fresh start.
4. Have made the MTU 1400 on the inside interfaces on the Pix and the 1841.
The tunnel is fully up at all times and as we say can ping in both directions.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jul 15, 2012
im trying to configure IpSEC over Gre tunnel, but the traffic pass unencrypted, i cant find why this is happening. Here are the confg of the two routers (1841)
OFICINA#sh run br
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 1281 bytes
!
version 12.4
service timestamps debug datetime msec
[Code].....
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 23, 2012
I have a 1841 router connected to an ISP (currently SDSL EFM 10Mbps through an ISP modem, the router and the model are connected with a FastEthernet interface). On another location I have a linux server.There is an ipsec tunnel (3des-sha esp) between the router and the linux server (actually done with a crypto mac).The router has a hierarchical QOS policy on the egress interface.When sending traffic from the network inside the router to the linux host without the ipsec tunnel, everything is working fine and throughput is correct.When sending traffic from the inside network to the linux host internal ip through the ipsec tunnel, some packets are lost and the traffic throughput decrease.When sending traffic through the tunnel in the reverse direction (from the linux host to the internal network), everything is fine.I looked at the QOS statistics and the dropped packets counters don't increase. I looked at the egress/ingress interface statistics and no packets dropped there.I lowered the MTU on the egress interface, but it didn't solve the problem. I played by sending various ping icmp packets size, but even small packets are sometimes lost.I tried to check the router CPU, but it seems relatively fine (<= 10%)I captured the traffic on both side, and I see the packets emitted, and then I can see that some of the esp packets of the corresponding side are not received, so it looks like the cisco router is the culprit. This 1841 router is running: 1841 Software (C1841-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.4(24)T4,How can I troubleshoot where and why those packets are lost?
View 0 Replies
View Related
Aug 9, 2011
Network Setup
===========
2 Site to Site VPN tunnels has been established, it is a hub and spoke topology. The hub is ASA5520 and the 2 spoke are a 1841 and 1801 router. The tunnel is able to pass traffic, it's a full tunnel VPN.The tunnel randomly disconnect for no reason. When I check the logs I can see some errors :
%CRYPTO-4-RECVD_PKT_INV_SPI: decaps: rec'd IPSEC packet has invalid spi for destaddr=x.x.x.x, prot=50, spi=0x5F822579(1602364793), srcaddr=y.y.y.y
%CRYPTO-4-IKMP_NO_SA: IKE message from y.y.y.y has no SA and is not an initialization offer
The actual address have been replace by x.x.x.x and y.y.y.y. I frequently have to peform clear crypto isakmp on the spoke routers to revive the VPN tunnels. Is there a way the tunnel can be re-establish again without manual intervention?This keep happening on a random basis and I have living with it for years. I have looked at cisco website troubleshooting tips and but no luck in finding out how to resolve it.
Below is my config on one of the spoke router:
==================================
Cisco IOS Software, C180X Software (C180X-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.4(24)T3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
crypto isakmp policy 10encr 3deshash md5authentication pre-sharegroup 2crypto isakmp key @@@@@@ address y.y.y.ycrypto isakmp invalid-spi-recoverycrypto isakmp keepalive 30 periodiccrypto isakmp nat keepalive 20!!crypto ipsec transform-set tset1 esp-3des esp-md5-hmaccrypto ipsec df-bit clear!crypto map ipsecvpn 10 ipsec-isakmp
set peer y.y.y.yset transform-set tset1match address vpn@spoke!archivelog config hidekeys!!!!!interface FastEthernet0ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.248ip nat outsideip virtual-reassemblyduplex autospeed autocrypto map ipsecvpn!interface FastEthernet1!interface FastEthernet2!interface FastEthernet3!interface FastEthernet4!interface FastEthernet5!interface
[code]....
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 23, 2011
I have 3 sites. Each site has a Cisco 1841 as its WAN router with a 10Mb direct internet access circuit connected to Fa0/0. The sites are then connected to each other via site-to-site IPSEC VPN. (The LAN switches in use at each site are Cisco 3750 series) [code]
Now, Site A has already been set-up with VoIP telephony. The plan is to extend this to the other 2 offices.Auto QoS has been set-up on the switches and data and voice VLANs created in the same way for each office.
how should/do we extend the QoS for the voice over the WAN to ensure voice quality remains for site to site calls. And what special considerations do we have to make for it being IPSEC VPN connectivity between the sites? The actual IP telephony system itself is being set-up by a 3rd party and not a lot of information on their requirements has been forthcoming so far – essentially all we have really been told is that they would like us to “reserve” a certain amount of bandwidth for the voice traffic between each site.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 23, 2013
I have a strange issue where im able to get an ipsec tunnel from tha cisco 1841 to a linksys/cisco RV016 for about a minute and ping/encrypt packets across the lin for about a minute before it goes down. I tried various configuration and it all results in the tunnel coming up for a minute then going down. I'm not sure if im hitting a bug and on which decide of if im doing something wrong.
RV016 firmware 2.0.18
cisco 1841: C1841-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 12.4(24)T
my config
no crypto isakmp default policy
!
crypto isakmp policy 1
encr 3des
hash md5
authentication pre-share
group 2
[code]....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 29, 2012
Any good vpn config for a router to allow vpn connections from Android phones using L2TP-IPSEC? Router is an 1841 running most current IOS ver 15.1.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 16, 2013
My fiance recently signed up for the Screen-wise Panel for Google research. Basically they monitor your TV usage and your internet usage. As part of the program they installed a Cisco WIFI router. I've got no issue with them logging the sites visited etc but I'm a little worried about them possible collecting private information (banking / work related stuff) that I don't want going out there. According to what I've read what's supposed to happen is they replace your router with the new Cisco router.The "technician" who came in and installed the router was actually a builder and not an IT technician and rather than replace our router he connected the Cisco router into port 4 of our router... I wasn't in at the time.
What I was looking to do is separate Port 4 of my router into a separate VLAN that can access the internet, but not access anything on ports 1-3, or the wireless. However, I want to be able to see everything on port 4 from the other side (in other words I want to see "into" the port 4 VLAN, but don't want them to see out). I also wanted DHCP to assign IP addresses correctly depending on where you were plugged in. In this example the first VLAN (your current router ip address) is going to be on 192.168.1.1, and the second VLAN (the new on we create on port 4) is going to be on 192.168.2.1.This is exactly what I'm looking to do, I could then connect the kids machines / tablets / ipods to the Cisco router and have the main machine and my work laptop on the main router... but I don't have a clue how to do it. </quote> Is this something that I am able to do with the Netgear router I own and is it hard to set up?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 24, 2011
There use to be Cisco 851 routers, but lately these routers are replaced with Cisco 861-K9 routers, and these 861 routers doesn't support DMVPN, instead 851 use to be.
Is there any license file we can upload in 861 router for DMVPN capability, if yes may i know the SKU # for that. We have some customers having 6-7 locations and they are planning to have 2 more locations, we implement already DMVPN in there network, if we go with the 87X or 88X router there price is almost double the price of 861.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 5, 2012
I have a problem with my routers (cisco 1941)I'm running a DMVPN network (Hub and spoke)All the hubs are connected to the 2 hubs. With 4 tunnels. (each hub has 2 interfaces to the spokes. the spokes only have one interface to the hubs, so I splitted them and so I now have 4 dmvpn tunnels). one of the interfaces on a hub malfuntioned and because of that the customers had problems with logging in and sending packets. I made this kind of structure because of when one of the tunnels failed the spoke could use the 3 others... BUT, what happened here was that the spoke still tried to use all 4 of the tunnels and because of that I had 25% package loss!So this didn't work. Now I read about IP SLA, but I was wondering of this could work? (I cannot test it on spare routers, and I don't want to implement it and risking a total network failure...) and how to configure it. Should I make 4 different sla processes which I should all 4 track? And when I make the ip routes, how should I make or configure it so that 1 of the tunnels/interfaces fails that the spoke would addapt the routes?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 11, 2012
I have a setup with two Cisco 877's – 1 for the hub and 1 for the spoke. The hub has a static WAN IP and the spoke has a dynamic WAN IP. The two sites are tunneled with DMVPN and cert auth for connections via Cisco VPN Client (terminating on hub router). All routes between the two sites work fine – I can see through both ends via LAN IPs and tunnel IPs. I can connect externally through Cisco VPN Client and RDP into PC's on the spoke end via local IPs.
My issue is: I want a port forward on the hub router, pointing to the IP (172.16.1.X) of a device on the spoke end. So using the WAN IP of the hub router, I can reach a host on the spoke side. At this point I cannot get this to work and feel it's related to a NATing issue. Here is my current config for both sites:
HUB Router:
!crypto pki server vpn-ca database level names issuer-name CN=*** CA,OU=*** Services,O=*** lifetime crl 336 lifetime certificate 7305 lifetime ca-certificate 7305 lifetime enrollment-request 1000 database url nvram!
crypto pki trustpoint vpn-server enrollment url http://172.16.0.1:80 usage ike serial-number none fqdn none ip-address ***WAN IP*** revocation-check crl rsakeypair vpn-server 2048 auto-enroll 70 regenerate!
crypto pki trustpoint vpn-ca revocation-check crl rsakeypair vpn-ca!
[code]....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 25, 2012
I have a DMVPN network with 2 hubs (2821's). This setup is used for VoIP applications over the Internet for teleworkers. At the main hub site I used to have only 1 Internet feed which was DSL with a static IP. Now I have 2 WAN feeds for this site - 1 FTTB w/ PPPoE & the DSL with static IP. Since this site also hosts a PRI, I want all voice communications to go through the FTTB link instead of the DSL for obvious reasons, but keep the DSL as DMVPN Hub for all NHRP lookups as this link has a static IP address & is very stable. We originally put the PRI router as a DMVPN spoke which connected through the FTTB link, with another router acting as the DMVPN hub on the DSL link. This was obviously a waste of machinery. I want to combine both routers into one. So I tried something like this (don't laugh):
Gi0/0 to FTTB (Dialer1 connects to Internet)
Gi0/1 to DSL (Public IP towards 877 demarc)
Tun0 attaches to Dialer1 public IP and connects to other spokes, no VRF
Tun1 attaches to Gi0/1 public IP and acts as DMVPN hub (ip nhrp map multicast dynamic) under VRF "Hub"
EIGRP AS 1 is set up twice, once under router eigrp 1, and the other using router eigrp 2 using an address-family under the Hub VRF.This kinda works but obviously Tun0 & Tun1 do not speak to each other. I also had to remove the ip nhrp map instruction that pointed to Hub1 on Tun0, as this was causing a weird condition in the router where it was repeatedly trying to connect a tunnel to itself, and crash the router because the NHRP process would go haywire. So my users must rely on the Hub2 to get a NHRP lookup for the PRI site. If Hub2 goes down, everything works in the network except for tunnel connections to the FTTB link. I'd rather not have to configure 2 tunnels on each spoke router unless I really have to.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 27, 2011
I am trying to spec out some routers for a small DMVPN network.I was thinking 2801's for my hub routers.will these run DMVPN out of the box or do they need additional hardware modules?according to the below linkyou need a "AIM-VPN/SSL-2" module in order for it to work, but then according to"The Cisco 2800 Series supports IPSec Digital Encryption Standard (DES), Triple DES (3DES), Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) 128, AES 192, and AES 256 cryptology without consuming an AIM slot."
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 9, 2011
Building a dmvpn network with 2911 hub router.Anyone have a clue how many simultaneous vpn connections can be used? The amount of transferred data is very small.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 19, 2011
suppose i have 2 hub location and one spoke and i want to config DMVPN between them and want to keep 1 HUB as active and 2nd HUb as passive then how its possible.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 10, 2012
What router would you choose to setup 1500 dmvpn tunnels (mGRE/ipsec)? so this router will be my hub and the hub will have 1500 tunnels.this router with this many tunnels will have to be able to provide excellent service to all spokes/tunnels.the spokes will mainly use the tunnels for business, transfering small files and some email I would say they may transfer 500megabyte of data per day but that's the absolute maximum.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 1, 2011
I have 5 cisco 1812 routers that i set up in a hub-spoke dmvpn configuration between 5 sites. All routers have a secondary internet connection . Could i set up a second tunnel interface on each router to create a backup dmvpn that will use this secondary internet connection? i use EIGRP for routing.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 31, 2011
I have three Hub routers that I'm wanting to compare DMVPN scalabiltiy capabilities (3825 versus 3945 and 3845). I know it must be there somewhere and I'm just not looking in the right place. But I've read and read and read about DMVPN designs and I'm not finding anything. This is turning into a time killer. What are the DMVPN limitations of these three routers are?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Feb 27, 2013
New to the forum and not much Cisco IOS experience let alone on the security side of things. I know how to navigate the IOS and can do basic switching and routing just fine. My company currently has a DMVPN setup w/ about 10 tunnels going back to the hub. We have 4 more sites they want me to setup and I keep getting stuck at the crypto maps. I have been reading about VPN's, DMVPN's , etc. for days now but can't find any examples of how we are configured. The priority of our crypto maps start at 65536 and go up. Default max is 65335 from what I have read, and I cannot assign a priority that high statically. [code]
View 3 Replies
View Related
