I understand that Cisco have at long last provided a facility to separate HTTP web authentication from HTTPS WLC management on WLC code 7.2.x for the new 5500 series WLCs.
My question is does Cisco intend to provide the same much needed functionality on the 4400 series WLCs that are running 7.0.x code? I was looking through the release notes for v7.0.235.3 code and that did not seem to mention this functionality. I know we can get around the problem by purchasing an SSL certificate so that guest users with web authentication do not have to see the same security warning each time they log in but the idea to separate the HTTP web authentication from HTTPS WLC management seems so much simpler.
I have inserted a certificate check in the secure desktop prelogin policy. When using AnyConnect client version 2.5.2019, both Windows 7 and Windows XP computers fail to connect. The following pop up message is displayed...Posture Assessment Failed: prelogin failed.I have been successfully using IP address checks, file checks, OS checks, and registry checks during prelogin but cannot use a certificate check.
I have a new customer that I installed an ASA 5505 to replace a Linksys VPN router. They have a main office with a static IP address, 3 branch offices with static IP addresses and 2 branches that are doing DHCP from the ISP for their router address. I have no problem getting the static VPNs up and running. My problem is with the VPN connections that are doing DHCP. I can go in and determine what IP they are currently using and setup a connection and it works fine. The problem is of course when their IP address from the ISP changes, which seems to happen at least daily. What is the proper way to setup a connection that is using DHCP? Also, can you setup multiple connections this way? Currently the 2 locations have different passwords setup in their routers.
We have a switch in our IT office, Cisco 2960G. It plugs into the wall and goes to the server room and connects somewhere. This weekend we redid almost the whole server room and now this switch can connect to the rest of the network. The uplink has a link light but can get anything.
I have rebooted the switch, used scanning on our other switches to try and find the MAC of the switch but for the life of me I cant see it. Is there a command I can run from the command line of the switch to see where its pointing?
In my organization we have 2 sites. These 2 sites have ASA 5520s, and the l2l between each ASA. The interface that is forming the VPN tunnel is on the ASA, NATed on the router. These ASAs sit behind the router, which are then connected to the ISPs. Recently, we had to change the ISP that we were creating the tunnel on, from Comcast to Sprint on our remote site. I re NATed the interface, and the l2l tunnel came back up after editing the tunnel-group, crypto maps, and reapplying the crypto map to the interface. However, our remote access VPN no longer works on the ASA that we changed the IP on. The other side was never changed, and still works fine. When I tried using debug cry isa and debug cry ip sec on the firewall, nothing shows when we attempt to connect. We are using IPsec over TCP. On the ASDM log, it says: Deny TCP (no connection) from xx.xx.xx.xx/49907 to xx.xx.xx.xx/10000 flags RST on interface WAN.
The VPN worked fine before, could it be an ACL thing? All we changed was the IP so that's what I'm inclined to believe, but on the router none of the interfaces have an ACL that's applied to them. It can't be on the ASA, because I believe we have the option to ignore the ACL enabled, but I might be incorrect about this. I'm new at ASA/VPNs in general.
I would upload the configs, but is there a pertinent output that would work, or just a general sh run?
Our ISP gave us a /30 for our external connection (with one IP being their side, and the other our firewall's outside int) and they then route a /28 down to us to give us 14 public IP addresses. Usually we use static NATs to give internal servers a public IP, and it works fine.
However, now I need to setup another VPN device with a public IP from our /28 pool. How the heck do I nat that? Should I give it's external int a private IP, and then NAT it at the first firewall? The 2nd firewall will be a VPN end point, and I'm afraid the NAT will break that.
I'm pondering this new client's topology. He has: (internet) >> router >> switch >> Windows server with a VPN enabled.
Right now I access his network remotely by just RDP directly into the server with a public IP address.Now doesn't this mean that I'm already sailing through his router and switch? Doesn't that mean that all (broadcast, routing, etc) communication hitting this IP is sucking CPU cycles and bandwidth on his router, switch, and server? Wouldn't it be best if he had his VPN endpoint set on his gateway?
Can a 2651XM router be configured as a PPTP VPN endpoint (client)? I ask because I want to connect this router to a professional vpn (privacy) service such as proxpn or mullvad or similar. If it can't, any vpn privacy services that cater for cisco-based vpn connection?
We have about 160 users setup using the Anyconnect client connecting to a ASA 5510. We are using split tunneling and also using the Websense endpoint client. Every now and again after installing the endpoint client we are unable to connect the AnyConnect. It asks for credentials waits for a while and then fails with the error "AnyConnect was not able to establish a connection to the specified secure gateway.Please try again later."
If we uninstall the endpoint client it works again and normally after reinstall it fails again ( I know). Eventually it just works and then its fine.
We have logged a call with websense and sent packet traces of working and none working . Then only thing they came back with is if we filtered the non working trace with port 80 you could see a few RST,ACK coming from the ASA to the client so they blamed the Cisco components.
I have a Snapgear 560U VPN Gateway at the main office with VPN connections to several branch offices also using Snapgear 560U. Those are no longer manufactured though, so I bought a Cisco WRVS4400N for our new office. The main office has a fixed IP but the branch office ha a dynamic one. On the Snapgear's it is very clear where I need to enter the Mandatory endpoint name on the dynamic side of the tunnel, but I can't find anything on this on the Cisco WRVS4400N. So where do I enter this information so that I can make a VPN connection between the Snapgear & Cisco boxes?
With firmware 1.2.0.9 - can the RV110W be used as a VPN endpoint? The VPN capabilities have been expanded in this version - but from the docs this isn't quite clear to me.
I purchased the RV180 to replace a dead Linksys BEFVP41 to connect a home office to HQ. The Linksys was configured with three IPSEC tunnels to connect to three different subnets all through the main HQ gateway. Note that each tunnel is independent with its own pre-shared key. I can configure the same tunnels on the RV180, and each one works correctly, but I can only get one to run at a time. I have to disable the other two. Enabling a second tunnel results in the No phase2 handle found error. I could not use the Basic VPN setup as it complains that the remote endpoint is already in use. I had to use the Advanced VPN Setup to create the IKE and IPSEC policies. In a different discussion [URL]
I have an ipsec tunnel IP is changing from mythical 200.200.200.182 to 200.200.200.254. Is it possible to change the .182 ip in below config via the CLI to .254 and have the site-to-site vpn continue to work? [code]
I try to connect a Router as an Endpoint (Because I just want to use a SERVICE from it).Well, the issue is this: I have a SW L3 that have too much VLANS, It is routing traffic and it provides internet connection. VLAN 182 has been created at this point and in this SW L3 has configured an interface vlan 182 with an IP 10.0.82.1/28.
To this Switch L3 is connected another switch L2 with an interface vlan 182 with an IP 10.0.82.2/28. Finally I have the last switch with the same features of configuration just that this has an IP 10.0.82.3/28. In this last switch is connected the router in the Gi1/0/24 as Switch port access, this port belongs to VLAN 182. At the router, the port is gi0/0 and it has an IP 10.0.82.4/28 and is UP.
The Switch where the router is connected is reachable from this router but not by the other switches. Router can reach all the network but not in the reverse way.Router has configured an ip default gateway 10.0.82.1.
we have installed nac for our customer and it works fine ,but the customer want the change the version of kaspersky antivirus from 6 to 8 end point security ,when we have try this the nac agent does not find the antivrus on the the workstation . i want to know if this version of kasoersky (end point security ) is supported by nac ,if no is ther a solution to make it works with the NAC .
I'm Connecting an endpoint to the switchport, the End client is a printer (Samsung ML-2850)Weird thing is after connect, the end point success got IP from DHCP server, but somehow cannot ping to it. For switching there's no concern, even I try with ohter PC connect to this switchport and it's PIGN'able. Only problem this printer cannot reach.
I able to see the MAC address entry of the printer at my ASA firewall, rule wise at this moment i just enable the rule as permit any any, no restriction at all.
I would like to know how to configure my DIR-600s firewall UDP Endpoint Filtering. I ve read some guides and I ve got to configure this to Endpoint Independent in order to play League of Legends. The problem is that I can see the option Firewall & DMZ but then I don't see the UDP or TCP Endpoint Filtering options.
In an enviroment with WCS and a WLC5508 with 40 AP's (WAPs are either 1262's and 1252's), I have noticed that the bulk of users are infact operating on 802.11g although most operating notebooks are running 802.11n capable NICs (including my own laptops NIC - but yet when I connect I connect at 54Mbps.). Only a small portion of registered clients are using 802.11n. All my WAPs have both radios enabled?My question is how does a client notebook select a "prefered" band of 802.11n. I know in some cases the wireless NICs themselves have an option to select the "Prefered Band", but there are many notebooks out there that dont have this option. What would make a client connect at 802.11n over 802.11g? Who makes that call ?
Environment :AP 2602, WLC 5508 V7.4, ISE 1.1.2, Prime Infras 1.2
For a specific SSID, we use MAC address as 1 of the conditions to authorize access only for the company-owned mobiles (smartphones and tablets), the other condition being, for the mobile, to present a valid AD user/password;this way, the so-called BYODs are rejected since this is the rule within this company ;The difficulty with this approach is the fact that there is no way in ISE Identities Endpoints nor Groups to associate a user-friendly name to the MAC address of the mobiles, which makes very tedious some actions such as a search in the ISE authentication Log based on the MAC address value itself;the question is just to know if it is planned to add a new field in Identities Endpoints definition that would allow to associate a user-friendly name to a MAC address, for future ISE versions,
While user's connecting through AnyConnect, AnyConnect doesn`t check endpoint attributes. I've configured checking process of "notepad.exe", but it doesn`t work. There is no checking process of "notepad.exe" in output debug dab trace (see attach).
ASA 5520 ver 8.4(1) AnyConnect 3.1.02040 HostScan 3.1.02043 CSD 3.6.6234
I am trying to connect my RV110W from my home office to our office IPSec router. I have a dynamic IP address and am using DDNS, therefore the RV110W local endpoint needs to be configured with my FQDN, not the IP address as this will change.
On page 100 the manual states
Step 4 -
• Local WAN (Internet) IP Address—Enter the public IP address or domain name of the local endpoint (Cisco RV110W).
This option is not available in my router - I am running firmware 1.2.0.9
In Cisco ASDM 7.1(1), webvpn configuration, it is possible to configure bookmarks with "vdi://" links to Citrix's or Vmware's Virtual Desktop Infrastructures, but we couldn't find any configuration resource (conf guide) on official Cisco site: if it is actually possible to integrate Vmware View Client into ASA 9.1 WebVpn solution?
I just recently bought a ASA5505 with a licence that can have 2 WebVPN Peers, I would like to have a phone to my CCME server as one of the options within that web-vpn thingy.
Is it possible on an Cisco Router to build WebVPN groups ? I want build one group for users with grand access rights.
--> Connect with anyconnect or Web Portal and have access to all Servers on 10.0.0.0 Network.
And another group for users with limited access priveleges.
--> Connect with anyconnect or Web Portal and can access only Server 10.0.0.10 Port XXXX and Server 10.0.0.20 on Port XXXX Info: i have an 881GW Router.
We have an ASA5510 with the Anyconnect Essentials license. I'm in the process of setting up Anyconnect and immediately run into a question. We have a /29 subnet setup and AFAIK i must use the outside interface address for Anyconnect. However i already have an https service PAT forward on this address. So, can i setup Anyconnect to listen on eg. the second ip in my public subnet?
is it possible to have the ASA connected to two ISP's and use the one ISP connection for Client/S2S VPN and Internet Access and the second ISP connection just for the WebVPN Traffic? How would you manage the Routing, as the default route is pointing to the first connection or is that not an issue here?
I ve setup Anyconnect on ASA 5510 and it seems to be working fine but cant get Jabber to work on smart phones. When using the packet tracer i see my packets dropped on WEBVPN-SVC. I am not using NAT anywhere and i can normally ping the CUCM from the client , i can open the web page of cucm but jabber says connection error.
my Cisco anyconnect VPN clients are able to access all of my internal networks accept to another site which has a IPSEC VPN site-to-site. The Cisco ASA forwards the packets destined to this remote site to a Cisco router which NATS the source addresses (pool 10.17.252.0/24) to a 192.168.46.0 range. The remote network is 155.x.x.x which I have included in my internal subnets object-group and added a route on the ASA to route it inside.
I have configured NAT so that it does not NAT anything from the anyconnect client range to the internal subnets. I am using version 8.3(2) and the NAT rule is: