Cisco VPN :: ASA 5505 / Asymmetric NAT Rules Matched For Forward And Reverse Flows?
Sep 13, 2010
I have a problem with a Site-to Site VPN connection between two ASA 5505 (ASA 8.2, ASDM 6.2). I have build the configuration on both devices [URL] . Under "Specifying Hosts and Networks / Remote Network" i use not the external ip of remote Site, i use the internal networks ( 10.0.1.0 and 10.0.2.0 ). I need connetion to two remote internal networks ( from 10.0.0.0 to 10.0.1.0 and 10.0.2.0 ). The Tunnel (Phase1 and Phase 2) comes up when i ping a host of the second (10.0.2.x) remote network, but a ping is not possible. Syslog says "Asymmetric NAT rules matched for forward and reverseflows; Connection for icmp src outside: 10.0.0.x dst dmz:10.0.1.x (type8, code 0) denied due to NAT reverse path failure ". On both Sites VPN connections with Cisco VPN Clients are possible.
View 5 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
May 6, 2013
I am new to ASA's and have just configured my 5505 out the box with an outside (10.10.1.7) + inside (192.168.1.1) IP & NAT. The ASA has got a default route to another router (default geteway) thats connected to the internet. I have it connected this way so I can play and **** around with the ASA. My problem is when I try and ping a host on the ASA inside network (192.168.1.0/24) from the outside (10.10.1.0/24) I'm getting the following error: 5May 07 201316:38:36305013192.168.1.6Asymmetric NAT rules matched for forward and reverse flows; Connection for icmp src outside:10.10.1.22 dst inside:192.168.1.6 (type 8, code 0) denied due to NAT reverse path failure The recommendation from the syslog details is:"When not on the same interface as the host using NAT, use the mapped address instead of the actual address to connect to the host. In addition, enable the inspect command if the application embeds the IP address". Beliw is my config:
interface Ethernet0/0switchport access vlan 2!interface Ethernet0/1!interface Ethernet0/2!interface Ethernet0/3!interface Ethernet0/4!interface Ethernet0/5!interface Ethernet0/6!interface Ethernet0/7!interface Vlan1nameif insidesecurity-level 100ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0!interface Vlan2nameif outsidesecurity-level 0ip address 10.10.1.7 255.255.255.0!boot system disk0:/asa842-k8.binftp mode passiveclock timezone EST -5clock summer-time EDT recurringdns domain-lookup insidedns domain-lookup outsidedns server-group DefaultDNSname-server 10.10.1.1object network obj_anysubnet 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0object network obj_net_Insidesubnet 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0object network Outside_globalhost 10.10.1.6access-list outside_access_in extended permit icmp any any echo-replyaccess-list outside_access_in extended permit icmp any any source-quenchaccess-list outside_access_in extended permit icmp any any unreachableaccess-list outside_access_in extended permit icmp any any time-exceededaccess-list
[code]....
View 8 Replies
View Related
Nov 11, 2012
Having a problem with a VPN site trying to communicate to a subnet off my ASA 5505. The network is simple, VPN IPSEC remote site is 192.168.6.0/24 and I can ping and access hosts on 192.168.10.0/24 (called InfraNet). I am now trying to allow communications between 192.168.6.0/24 (called FD_net) to 192.168.9.0/24 (called Inside) [code]
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 29, 2012
I am seeing the following error on my Cisco ASA 5510 running 8.4(4):Asymmetric NAT rules matched for forward and reverse flows; Connection for tcp src inside:10.1.0.8/1798 dst inside:10.1.0.14/25 denied due to NAT reverse path failure .Doing research I see there are plenty of nonat statements regarding connecting from one interface to another, but why am I seeing this error on the same interface.All our servers are connected via a Cisco 3750G switch with a very basic config. Why is the firewall interjecting itself and causing these issues?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jul 4, 2012
I am trying to lock down the VPN access on my Cisco 5520 ASA's whereby I wish not to allow users to SSH access etc on servers running on the same interface that they are VPNing into.
I did not originally configure the ASA and so I am slightly confused by some config on it. Currently when I attempt to PING a server within the same interface as the VPN network I get the following error in the logs below.
5 Jul 05 2012 09:45:15 305013 monitoringsystem Asymmetric NAT rules matched for forward and reverse flows; Connection for icmp src dmzAHdata:VPN IP dst AHdata:monitoringsystem (type 8, code 0) denied due to NAT reverse path failure
As a workaround I created a NAT exempt rule which then allowed traffic to the server in question however I wish to limit the traffic to only ICMP and when I do this in the firewall it does not take affect. Is this because of the NAT exempt rule?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 14, 2012
over my port forward GUI in my new linksys x3000. When I try to save any new port forward rules (new or using predefined), the setting are not saved when I get back to the configuration screen again. Nothing seems to get configured.
Have just uppgraded firmware to v1.0.01, but no difference.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 27, 2011
I'm new to working with the ASA 5505 ,VPN and reverse NAT.
The basic setup is as follows. I'm trying to setup a IPsec site to site tunnel with reverse nat on the remote side.
I have as the tunnel up and it passes traffic. I have setup reverse NAT for 172.x.x.1 to translated IP 216.x.2.101 my ASA also has an IP address of 216.x.2.102.
Any connection from 172.x.x.1 to 216.x.2.1 should appear to be comming from 216.x.2.101
When I ping or telnet from 216.116.86.1 to an open port on 216.x.2.101 I get the banner from 172.x.x.1, seems like it is working.
However in my setup I'm only given a singel IP that of the NAT address 216.x.2.101, so when I remove the IP address assigned to the inside interface 216.x.2.102. all conductivity is lost.
When I set the inside interface to 216.x.2.101 and I setup a static NAT rule for 172.x.x.1 to 216.x.2.101, I get a message that says all traffic will be redirected and I will be unable to connect to the ASA.
Once thats in place, and I make any connection from 216.x.2.1 to 216.x.2.101on any port I get a connection but then it's reset, I no longer get the telent banner I was expecting.
My running config is,
ASA Version 8.2(1)
!
hostname ciscoasa
[Code].....
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 16, 2013
We have a singe IP Address in the Internet and want to forward SMTP traffic that hits our ASA Outside Interace to the internal Mailserver.And we like to forward Http Traffic to our Webserver.
Example.
212.23.23.23 Port 25 -> 192.168.1.100 Port 25
212.23.23.23 Port 80 -> 192 168.1.200 Port 80
How do i acomplish that. Which NAT rules do in need?
View 12 Replies
View Related
Apr 28, 2011
Connection denied due to NAT reverse path failure
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 5, 2012
I'm trying to configure a second server on my network but whenever I add the static NAT rule, the internet stops working on that computer.
Here's my Cisco ASA configuration:
ASA Version 7.2(3)
!
hostname domain
[Code].....
View 16 Replies
View Related
Jun 21, 2012
In the last 8 month I have been upgrated at least 6 Cisco ASA 5505 from 8.2(1) to 8.4(3) without problems, I did a minor changes and all related to rules due a problem with the migration.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 7, 2012
Previous attempts to set up these NAT rules has been met with minimal success. We have been able to get the NAT rules created, and able to ping our inside servers and receivers from a different outside network, but every time we get that far our internal network crashes. Running the Packet Trace utility via the ASDM shows that internal traffic from the servers to the workstations is being blocked by the default implicit rule under the access rule heading that states "any to any, service being ip, action= deny". Reverse traffic from the workstations to the servers is being allowed though. In an effort to start over again, the Cisco ASA has been Factory Defaulted via the CLI, and has had it's Inside network, and Outside IP address set back up. DHCP pool has been setup for a minimal amount of addresses on the inside network, since most of our equipment will always be assigned statics. We reset our static NAT policies, and seem to be having the same problem. My partner and I have been working on this for some time now, and have ourselves so frustrated that I know we are missing something simple. [code]
View 10 Replies
View Related
Jan 15, 2013
Here is my environment: DSL Modem - ASA 5505 - switch ,Inside network (192.168.2.0/24)
What I have successfully done:
- Modem online and passing on DHCP requests from the ASA to my ISP (ASA does get an internet address on the outside interface)
- ASA assigning DHCP to internal network
- All internal clients can access the internet.
What I am getting stuck on is getting NAT rules set up for simple port forwarding. What I would like: ANY internet address be able to access a server on the inside network address (192.168.2.x) over tcp/22 . I set up what I believe to be the correct NAT rule and Access Rule, but the packet tracer fails. Here is my config.
ASA Version 9.1(1)
hostname xxxxxx
domain-name ugh
enable password xxxxx encrypted
xlate per-session deny tcp any4 any4
xlate per-session deny tcp any4 any6
[code]......
View 6 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2012
I'm having trouble setting up the correct rules on an ASA 5505 I'm using in my home office. I have a couple of IP Cams I need to access remotely.
I've tried setting up simple NAT(PAT) and/or Access Rules, but it hasn't worked. I have a single dynamic IP for the Outside interface. Call it 77.76.88.10 and I am using PAT. The CAM is setup to connect on port 80, but could be configured if necessary. I've tried setting up NAT Rules using ASDM as follows:
Match Criteria: Original Packet
Source Intf = outside
Dest Intf = inside
[Code]....
I'm afraid to use CLI only because I am not confident I'll know how to remove changes if I make a mistake.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Nov 7, 2011
I need to forward some ports for remote desktop and remote outlook which I host on an internal server. I have looked all over the web and got close, but no hints on how to do it in the asa 8.2. there is an 8.3 guide, but it is just different enough to not work. I am new to this device and cli.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 24, 2012
I have been asked to "forward a port on an ASA 5505 to an internal ip address." Sounds easy for most of you, and I thought I did it right, but I am not certain. Basically, they want it set up so that when xx.xx.xx.xx:30000 (x's = the firewall ip with port 30000) is accessed from outside, it is forwarded to an internal ip on port 30000 (xxx.xxx.x.xxx:30000)
Here is what I tried from within ASDM 6.4:
1. NAT Rules-add static NAT route:
original-Interface: inside
-Source: xx.xx.xx.xx (local ip of computer on LAN they wish to access from outside)
Translated - Interface - Use Interface IP Address
Enable PAT: Original and Translated port both set to 30000
2. Access Rule - add
Interface: Inside
Source: any
Destination: xx.xx.xx.xx (IP of Firewall)
Service: tcp/30000
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 18, 2011
I currently have two Cisco ASA 5505. They are at different physical sites (SITE A, SITE B) and are configured with a site-to-site VPN which is active and working.
I can communicate with the subnets on either site from the other and both are connected to the internet, however I need to ensure that all the traffic at my site B goes through this VPN to my site A.
I changed this access-list : access-list outside_2_cryptomap extended permit ip network_siteB network_siteA to access-list outside_2_cryptomap extended permit ip network_siteB any
But this does not work. If I do [URL], site B IP address is not same that site A.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Feb 27, 2011
I have a cisco asa 5505 and i need a public ip address on the inside of my network without NAT. for example: I can create a static nat translation rule, but this is not what i need.
isp -> x.x.x.1 /29 (outside asa) (inside network) x.x.x.2 /29
Is this possible?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 11, 2011
I have an ASA 5505 running 8.4(1), and I'm configuring it with ASDM 6.4(1). The outside interface is configured with a single static address. I have a few services port forwarded sucessfully to three different servers on the inside network.
I need to make a media proxy on a SIP server available to the outside. It requires a large range of forwarded UDP ports for the media channels.
I tried adding a network object NAT rule like the others I'm already using to forward HTTP and RDP. I entered a range of ports for the real port and the mapped port using the syntax 60000-60999. ASDM accepted it, but the NAT rule list displays "Any" in the service column. When I apply the change, I get the following error:
nat (inside,outside) static interface service tcp 60000-60999 60000-60999
^
ERROR: % Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
How do I forward a large range of UDP ports from the outside interface to a single server on my inside network? I'd like to use ASDM, but I can switch to the CLI if that works better.
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 30, 2013
I have an old ASA 5505, and I'm having some trouble with Nat Hairpinning. I've done this with other firewalls before and I am having no luck now. I have an internal address that I wish to forward from an external address- so if someone goes to 123.456.789.012:3456 then it will forward to 192.168.1.244:92 (All numbers are arbitrary here- only for illustration). I have and Access Rule and NAT and PAT set up so that I can get in if I originate from outside the LAN. What I am trying to do is to have this work from inside the LAN as well- so that if I am at my desk, and I connect a device and type in 123.456.789.012:3456, it will deliver the content at 192.168.1.244:92. The problem I am having is that it just isn't working, and I cannot figure out why- When I started here, there was an address configured to work this way, and it still works- I just cannot find what is different between what I am doing and what the person who configured it did.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 13, 2012
I just got a Cisco asa 5505 with the next OS and ASDM info ASA 5505 OS 8.4(3) ASDM 6.47 I configured and enter all rules to allow incoming traffic to LAN but it's not working also, I have one host inside that is configured in a second IP and create the rule to allow traffic to it but it doesn't work too.
Problem 1 I have VNC running in port 5900 tcp and I want to connect from Internet using port 6001 and this has to forware the connection to the real VNC port. In the configuration I have a few host with the same configuration but I use different outside port to get it.
Problem 2. I have a second IP with services: SMTP, HTTP, HTTPS and port 444 all TCP forwarding to a server in the LAN.
Facts: SMTP. Every time that I do telnet to the second IP looking for the SMTP port, the firewall doesn't let the incoming connection goes through and the LOGGING screen doesn't how that connection.PORT 6001 (outside)this port is configured to work with the IP in the outside internface and it was to send the incoming connection to a host inside to the real port 5900.Can any one check my configuration if I'm missing anything? for sure I'm but I didn't find it. Bellow is the configuration, I masked the Public IPs just left the last number in the IP, also I left the LAN network to see better the configuration.
CONFIGURATION.
: Saved
:
ASA Version 8.4(3)
!
hostname saturn1
domain-name mydominio.com
enable password SOMEPASS encrypted
[code]....
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 29, 2012
We are in a planning phase of adding another service to our DMZ. The DMZ has a singe publicly accessible IP. We are running Citrix inside our network externally accessible via w121eb https (443). Another service will be added to the DMZ (Exchange/O365) requiring ADFS & and ADFS proxy also using port 443 as well. Both services (the Citrix secure gateway & ADFS) will have separate subdomains but directed to that same IP, each with its own cert.
Now, I guess the question is: How (if possible) can we forward the public requests to the two services that hit our network on the same port (can't change the port on either), to two separate appliances with their own internal IP's internally?Our current appliance on the DMZ is an ASA 5505. Also could use a PIX
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 4, 2011
I have a couple of ASA 5505's which work fine for what they are doing VPN and all that - we have 1 DLINK DFR-700 Firewall left and I need to get a new ASA to replace this since it is old.
All this box really does is port forward external clients to 1 address on the internal lan for client software updates. Any example configs?
So lets say we have client a with IP 1.1.1.1 and client b has 2.2.2.2 - at the moment this is what happens client a and b come in through http and get mapped to the internal http server 10.10.1.2
So I need to setup about 100 clients which can come in through http only - get mapped to the internal IP and also keeping the internal server to be able to access anything outside.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 19, 2011
So I've just discovered the Cisco ASA is not capable of performing policy-based routing.
I am in a position where I need to manipulate traffic flows from the inside network outwards for TCP80 & TCP443 traffic toward a transparent proxy server while default routing the remainder of the non-matching traffic.
Can anybody think of a way to do this with the ASA? Would a destination NAT work?
For example:
nat (inside,outside) source static any any destination obj_any proxy_object service tcp 80 80 nat (inside,outside) source static any any destination obj_any proxy_object service tcp 443 443
Why would the ASA not support PBR?
View 7 Replies
View Related
May 23, 2011
When we do self diagnostic test for WAE connected to the 6500 switch i get warning as below. Due to this alert there is no major acceleration benfits by the WAAS
Test WARN [tfo] WARN ASYMMETRIC Asymmetric routing is seen in the device Action: Check router's network configuration and WCCP redirection on the router.usevwa1#
6509 switches has only L2 capability and does not do WCCP redirection. The WCCP re-direction is done by 2821 routers.Is there any command which needs to be given in 6500 switch to solve the issue
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 7, 2012
Is it possible to split data flows on a single T1. Say 1 Flow on time-slots 5-6 and another data flow on time-slots 10-14. If one was data and the other voice would this work?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 8, 2012
I have an old ASA 5505, and I'm having some trouble with Nat Hairpinning. I've done this with other firewalls before and I am having no luck now. I have an internal address that I wish to forward from an external address- so if someone goes to 123.456.789.012:3456 then it will forward to 192.168.1.244:92 (All numbers are arbitrary here- only for illustration). I have and Access Rule and NAT and PAT set up so that I can get in if I originate from outside the LAN. What I am trying to do is to have this work from inside the LAN as well- so that if I am at my desk, and I connect a device and type in 123.456.789.012:3456, it will deliver the content at 192.168.1.244:92. The problem I am having is that it just isn't working, and I cannot figure out why- When I started here, there was an address configured to work this way, and it still works- I just cannot find what is different between what I am doing and what the person who configured it did.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jun 7, 2013
We have several L2L tunnels with remote networks that access networks inside. I am using object-groups to define the networks, then using the same object-groups in the twice-nat so the networks are accessible. For example:
Remote Network - 192.168.1.0/24 defined as object "RemoteA"
Inside Subnet - 10.1.1.0/24 defined as object "LocalA"
object-group network RemoteVPN
network-object object RemoteA
network-object object RemoteB
etc....etc..
[code]....
I receive the "Asymmetric NAT rules matched for forwared and reverse flows" error, inidcating Source of "RemoteA" IP and destination of "LocalA" IP. Typically this indicates a missing twice-nat; however they are in the object-groups that are a part of the twice-nat specified above. The only way I have been able to clear the errors is to create a new twice-nat using the individual subnet objects. If I do a "show nat object-group LocalVLANS detail", all the subnets are displayed accordingly.
I have many twice-nat statements using object-groups, and working for over a year now. I only started recently having issues with this error; and am concerned it is related to some cap on using object-groups in twice-nat.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Oct 14, 2012
some misconfiguration (?) may be the reason for an undesired behaviour we are experiencing with our Cisco CSS 11501s. Balancing mechanisms work fine, however if a service transitions to the "down" state, the corresponding flows remain "alive" leading to a temporary outage of our service. Subsequent client requests are still being sent to the "down" frontend which is unresponsive.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 9, 2013
I have the requirement to assign an asymmetric bandwith limit to each port on a switch (example: 4Mbps downlink, 1Mbps uplink). I've been searching and found the option to apply policers or srr-queue mechanism to achive this, however this only applies for one direction only as far as I know. Catalyst 2960 familiy is preferred, however if this is not possible, will possibly jump to the 3560X family.
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 26, 2011
Do you know if it is possible to filter TOIP flows between call server (Siemens technology) and phones ?Specialy, PIX is able to support dynamic ports opening?? Is there an ALG embeded?Is it required to upgrade PIX or not? is required a special licence??
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 30, 2011
I have an ASA 5510 running version 7.0. I have a problem with an exchange server using a static map and its outbounc connectivity. It connects outbound through the global address even though inbound connectivity works fine through the static mapping. The recent changes are changing of the zero route through a different interface (there are to circuit connected to this ASA on different interfaces). So the idea was to get all workstations in the office using the global address and routing out through one circuit, and the servers connecting in/out through the other circuit. Shouldn't a static mapping ignore what the zero route is?
Here are what I believe to be the relevant configs.
interface Ethernet0/0
description New 6mb circuit
speed 100
[Code]....
So exchang2 server can be connected to from the outside properly via IP xxx.207.51.231/exchange2-outside, but all outbound connections from this server are going out via IP xxx.122.47.218/circuit-6mb as do all the workstations due to the global address statement.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 6, 2012
I am aware that the 3750 switches are not able to support Netflows, so I have created a SPAN port and spanning traffic from a specific port. I would like to create a seperate VLAN and trunk the traffic from the SPAN port down to the 6509 switch and then capture all the traffic for that VLAN on the 6509.
View 4 Replies
View Related
