the customer has ACS 5.3 and it was connected with AD successfully.Now the customer has changed the DC name and ACS still refers to the old name.How to force the new DC discovery without clear all the configurations ?,Without DC discovery, I have the disconnect status, but I'm still able to browse AD groups.
View 7 Repliescurrently I'm evaluating an ACS 5.2.I need to authenticate the VPN-Users against LDAP, but have no direct connection from the ASA to the LDAP-Server. So the ASA should connect to the ACS to ask the LDAP-Identity-Store, OK.
My first Problem is: the ACS doesn't respond to the RADIUS-Requests of the ASA! ASA use's Port 1812, the Secret is ok, the ASA is as a Network Device in the ACS configured and I've created an internal Test-User on the ACS.the Firewall-Log shows the established connection (so I think, there is a Hand shake!? ), but the ASA says in Radius-Test: "EROR:Authentication-Server not responding".
We have 4 ACS 5.3 Servers connected as Primary and Secondary Servers.We use a "RSA SecurID Token Servers" External userdatabase for authentications and are able to sucessfully authenticate (vpn-)users when the requests are send from the primary ACS Server.As soon as a secondary ACS server sends the request to the RSA server the request fails. "Node verification failes"
On the RSA Authentication Manager 6.1 Server, we have created a Agent-host wich contains the 3 secondary nodes (FQDN and IP's). The "sdconf.rec" file has been installed on theprimary ACS Server and are automatically (so it looks like) replicated to all ACS Servers.Still none of the secondary server are able to authenticate the users agains the RSA server.
Any experience in using Nokia IPSO with ACS5.x and non-locol accounts ( on the Nokia )
I`ve created a shell profile with the following config :
Attrib: service Value: nokia-ipso
Attrib: Nokia-IPSO-User-Role Value: "role_name_on_IPSO"
Attrib: Nokia-IPSO-SuperUser-Access Value: 1
The user is passing authentication but is denied access on IPSO as "user not configured for Voyager". I`m not 100% the config above is accurate as any previous instructions were based on 4.x & Interface config.
I'm trying to configure a timeout for network connection, but when it suppose to disconnect client, it's not working. Is it possible to do this??
Only works when the client is connecting and is denied if the time is not valid. But how could I do this if the client is already connected, enable re-authentication?
I have a 802.1x solution with two redundant ACS 5.2. Network A configuration use like Primary ACS-SJM and ACS-GLX like a secondary for network B configuration use like Primary ACS-GLX and ACS-SJM like a secondary. My solution was working fine about one year ago. but one week ago isn´t working fine. The problem my ACS-SJM lost connectión and user can´t authenticated when the user trye to connect to ACS-GLX either can´t connect. I have to shutdown the ACS-SJM that way can authenticate to the ACS-GLX. I check the log and I didn´t find anything I check the switch.. too where the ACS is connected. but didn´t find anything too.
both ACS have the following IOS version:
ACS 5.2.0.26.4
are the connections between the ACS and external identity stores encrypted?I know that when setting up LDAP identity store there is the option to specify SSL conection. Are the other connections encrypted by default, or is the data sent between the ACS and AD, for example, sent in the clear?
View 3 Replies View Relatedcustomer provide quite large network with dot1x deployment - there is dual ACS5.3 servers for authentication Wired, VPN and WiFi access. Users (and computers) are mostly authenticated against Active Directory - there are several AD servers in the network.I found there is tens of cases every day with error message:24401 Could not establish connection with ACS Active Directory agent.This happens in random day and night time regardless on current authentication load. how to diagnose this more deeply? Or where to look for – is it problem with internal communication with AD Agent or is the problem in communication AD agent to AD servers? How is solved redundancy in case one AD server is not accessible – as there is no such setting in the AD connection configuration in ACS.
View 9 Replies View RelatedRecently our ACS loss connection to AD. Notice following error message (collect from show tech):
Dec 9 00:05:31 OasPrp-Lvl07-ACS01 adclient[24514]: INFO <bg:ageBindings> base.
bind.healing Lost connection to myhqkul990003s.simedarbygroup.com. Running in di
sconnected mode: KDC refused skey: Preauthentication failed
[Code]....
However we manage to restore the connection by reset password of the AD account that used in establish connection between AD and ACS.
I am trying to configure the ACS with AD in the identity store but am running into the following issue.I enter the AD Domain Name and username and password and hit the 'Test Connection' button and receive a DNS error stating that it 'Cannot resolve network address'.I have logged into the CLI and test to the domain name from there and it works fine.
View 5 Replies View RelatedACS had been integrated with Active Directory before ACS upgrade to 5.3. After the ACS 5.3 upgrade users aren’t able to login to AAA devices occasionally. Error message is:
{AuthenticationResult=Error; Type=Authentication; Authen-Reply-Status=Error; }
24429 Could not establish connection with Active Directory
At the same time, when this issue occurs, ACS connection to AD works fine (checked with Users and Identity Stores> External Identity Stores > Active Directory “Test Connection”)
I'm trying to test such 802.1x wired environment:windows xp sp3 as supplicant windows NPS as radius server 2960 as authenticator latest anyconnect (3.1.01065) + nam and standalone profile editor.I have a question: What is the difference between protected identity pattern and unprotected identity pattern (set in nam profile editor)? As I understand documentation PEAP-MSCHAPv2 is a tunneled method and it uses un- protected identity pattern to protect user's identity during phase 0. But if I use any fake identity here (anonymous, anonymous@[domain], etc) access is rejected (Access-Reject in switch debugs). I have to use exacly the same pattern in unprotected identity pattern as in protected identity pattern ([username] or [username]@[domain]) to gain access, regardless of authenticaton mode (same in machine only, user only authentication).
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a new Cisco Secure ACS 5.2 on a VM. We want to use it to for administrative access to our Cisco equipment with TACACS+. I am trying to map user permissions to different groups of devices based on active directory group membership, however it is not working.
I am using an LDAP (configured for secure authentication) external identity store. On the directory organization tab, I have confirmed the accuracy of the subject and group search base and the test configuration button shows that it's finding > 100 users and >100 groups.
On the directory groups page I have entered the groups according to the required format. cn=groupname1,ou=groups,dc=abc,dc=com
I have a rule based result selection under group mapping. I have two rules in the format below.
Conditon
LDAP:Externalgroups groupname1
Result
Identitygroup1
I have the default group set to a identity group named other. My problem is, no matter what user attempts to authenticate, the Default rule is applied, and the user is put into the other identity group.This occurs when I log on as a groupname1 user, groupname2 user, or as user that is not a member of either of those groups. LDAP authentication works and the user is able to logon to the device.
We are using ACS 5.2 and we are trying to create a Microsoft Active Directory (AD) Identity Store. We have a user to be used in the Active Directory creation General page and we would like to know how the test communication / ACS to AD communication takes place.
Our user is a predefined user in AD and has admin rights, but the password expires every 60 days. Will this affect the communication between AD and ACS 5.2 at everytime the entered user's password expires?
I'm currently looking for a solution in order to restrict the modification of the host internal identity store (add or delete MAC host) per group. The default administrator roles does not include "per group restriction". Under the ACS I defined one group per department? My objective it to allow each department to access their ACS MAC database to add or delete MAC addresses as required.
How to restrict internal identity store per group?Do I need to create new roles? and how?I was not able to get an answer from the ACS ADMIN manual.
I have a new ACS 5.3 configure and a ASA5550 to authenticate VPN users using a remote LDAP server. Once I try to authenticate the users with the ACS it gives me the error message "22056 Subject not found in the applicable identity store(s)."
I checked out the documentation and have already configure the Identity store sequences to redirect everything to the LDAP server, I also did the Bind test and it says that is ok, but I still have the same problem.
I validated the Access Policies Menu, and tried to create a new Service Selection Rules, but whet I get to the option of modifying the Identity option I get the error: "This System Failure occurred: {0}. Your changes have not been saved.Click OK to return to the list page. " and I'm not able to modify the identity, not in this new option I created, nor in the ones already created in the ACS.
I have two ACS v 5.2 (primary and secundary) and some users are in the internal stor and the others are in the AD.The local site topology is like this:
PC - AP - WLC - ACS - AD
Authentication method is PEAP(EAP-MSCHAPv2) and all user have the certificate company installed. The OS in the client users is Windows 7.Users was working fine but some users reports intranet disconnections. I see in the ACS log many "22056 Subject not found in the applicable identity store(s)." and "24415 User authentication against Active Directory failed since user's account is locked out" alarms.I believed it was because user wasn´t in the AD data base, but some times the same user is authenticated successfull and other i see the "22056...." or "24415...." alarms.
I switched the role for ACS primary to works as secundary and we see the same alarms.
I have ACS 5.2 running as a VM. I'm AD, then local authentication successfully for device access, but I want to define ACS user groups to restrict login. I don;t see any way to do this. If I use AD groups, they don;t show up as selection options on the policy screens, just the ACS locallyy defined groups.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have a ACS 4.3.2 installed with users authenticating against an Active Directory database. The AD database not only authenticate the users but also assigns the group that is used to select IP address pool.Now the requirements require to use token authentication with SafeNet. This authentication uses the same username but the password is composed of the original password + OTP.The problem is that the SafeNet server doesn't return the group membership.I've read about the Identity Store Sequence in ACS 5.x and I think I could use it in the following sequence:! configure an Authentication Sequence using the SafeNet token server (this works with ACS 4.x)I configure an Attribute Retrieval Sequence against the AD database. This would use the username only, no password and would retrieve the group membership.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm looking for Cisco ISE v1.1 to use the following licensing feature. url...Endpoint is dynamically profiled by Cisco ISE and assigned dynamically or statically to an endpoint identity group. Cisco ISE authorization rules do not use this endpoint identity group.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am currently running cisco ACS 5.1.0.44 and use active directory as the main authentication identity store to allow network administrators to have access to network devices in my organization .As per the established security policies in my organization , the ACS has to disable any account after 3 failed login attempts to any network devices .i have gone through all the settings oN the acs but couldn't find where or how it is done .
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have installed ACS 5.4 and we are looking to authenticate our Anyconnect users with ACS via Active Directory. I think I have the correct commands in our ASA ( we had ACS 4 and authenticated our anyconnect users ).
I also have configured ACS to use Active Directory and installed the server side cert in ACS. I'm just uncertain how to program ACS to use the security group that I have setup in Active Directory.
I have an ACS 5.3 cluster, that is configured to use AD. There are a few wireless devices, and monitoring tools that do not have AD accounts. I would like to configure ACS to first check AD for the user authentication, and if that fails to roll over to the local (Internal Users) identity source where I can define these user accounts.
It seems that when the authentication hits the initial Identity Policy rule, it never moves onto the next one if the first fails.
Attached are screen shots that show how i'm configured for the test, i have a local user defined and I'm trying to log into the firewalls.
- Identity Definition : Screen shot of the main ACS definition for the rule i'm testing that's not working
- Identity Rule 1 : The configuration of rule 1 that if it fails i need it to move onto rule 2.
- Log Output : Screen shot for one of the failed attempts from the ACS View Log server.
Reason I need to configure it this way is:
- Wireless users authenticate to wireless using AD user accounts. Some hand held scanners do not support that and will need to authenticate using the MAC address.
- Authentication to Network devices for managment uses AD accounts. We have some monitoring tools that do not have AD accounts, and will need to be able to log into Network devices to issue some commands (Examples: Cisco Prime LMS and NCS, Infoblox NetMRI).
how profiling works exactly ?How intelligent is the profiling engine, meaning: Will it discover that one device has more than one different MACs and will merge the entries in the database ??
Example:This is in fact the same device, there is only one WLC-2500 in the network ....If it can discover that, what needs to be configured on the ISE to do that ?
I have setup an Identity Firewall on a ASA version 5.6 on a DMZ interface.I have installed the ADAgent on a domain member Win2008 and configured as follows: [code]
where ashdew is a domain user and ACL 122(only one line) is applied on the dmz interface and NAT is properly configured.The ADagent has been properly tested and ASA can register to it.The ASA can connect to AD DC controller and query user database.I have placed a laptop ip 172.17.h.x on the DMZ and can ping the DMZ interface.
The laptop cannot authenticate on the domain and the asa does not seem to retrieve the user identity.Do I need to add extra rules in the access-list 122 to permit trafic to DC?Can I check on the AD Agent if it can retrieve the user to ip mapping ?
I understand that Cisco Secure ACS 5.3 supports the integration with existing external identity repositories such as Windows Active Directory and LDAP servers. In fact, in my environment, my ACS 5.3 is now integrated with AD and RSA.My question here is can Cisco Secure ACS 5.3 integrate with "multiple" WIndows AD, LDAP, RSA Server etc.? if yes, is there a Cisco document stating this? The keyword here is multipple.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am trying to setup PEAP authentication for wireless users but I got stuck at place where I have single ssid and users are store in different identity stores like some will be using their active directory and some are locally created users on ACS. I created separate service for wireless authentication and under that I am unable to create rule to differentiate them with identity stores. any idea how to achieve this.
I tried creating identity selection based on role but it does not work as for protocol like radius.peap,ms-chap ACS does not look for another identity store once user not find in an identity stores.
After clicking on below path we are not getting option as should be reflected. Below is the snapshots for the issues.
Access Policies > Access Services > Default Device Admin > Identity
I configured before ACS v4.2 to authenticate network devices using internal users at first, and if the user is not found use AD list users. But with v5.3 I have some problems doing this, on identity policies I use rule based result selection option, I configured 2 polices for Identity source, one for Internal Users and other policy for AD user, but it only works with the first policy, internal users or AD, but works only for the first policy identity. how to do that, if the user is not found on first policy, continue to the next policy.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI need a specify users to allow access to particular devices and give privilege only for show command or show run. Here is how I tried to configured.
1. Configured two seperate Shell Profile and Command set with privilege level 4-5 and allowing only show run command
2. create seperate service selection rule with adding the require NDG and protocol TACACS and maching service "RestrictAccess"
3. In the RestrictAccess Service I have following configured; Identity: internal users, Group Mapping to a particular group where the user exists, authorization: matching the above created identity group, NDG, shell profile, command sets
All the steps are attached in the .doc file. However when I tried with the particular user he is able to access everything and he is not hitting the correct access rule.
We are running ISE 1.0.4 with a requirement that on the surface is simple, but fails to execute properly no matter how I tweak it it. It is:
VPN users either need to be within a certain AD group or They need to authenticate against RSA.
I set authentication to use an identitysequence with RSA listed first, then AD second.
I set authorization to check identity server (using network access:AuthenticationIdentityStore).
- If it’s RSA, pass it.
- If it’s Active directory, AND the condition with a check on that group membership. Pass if both pass.
- Set the default authorization rule to deny access.
This should work. Here’s where it breaks down. It all stems from the fact that the same userIds exist in RSA and AD and that ISE steadfastly refuses to attempt the second identity server method listed in the sequence if RSA is listed first.
• If I list RSA first and the “authentication failed” policy is set to Reject: For users not in RSA that I want to authenticate against AD, it rejects – it attempts against RSA but never hits AD (second server listed in the Identity sequence). This is what is brokenThis works for users in RSA
• If I list the RSA server first and the “authentication failed” policy is set to continue Users not in RSA will pass authentication that shouldn’t because the network access: AuthenticationIdentityStore value will be pointing to the RSA server, regardless of whether they actually passed to that server or not.Effectively users can connect regardless of whether their password is right or notThis option sets it to proceed from authentication to authorization
• If I list AD first in the sequence Since the same ID exists in both AD and RSA, it’ll fail as bad password against AD. It'll never attempt against RSA.
Am I missing a simple fix for this? I have a testbed in which I can simulate the issue but since I don’t have an RSA server handy, I’m using an identity sequence with AD and fallback to internal. It works as I’d expect, falling back from AD to local if the user doesn't exist in AD. If the user is in AD, it never tries local and shows the attempt as a bad password.
how to associate an AD group - which i have defined in users and identity stores/external identity stores/Active Directory/Directory attributes to associate with the relevant identity groups - Users and identity stores/identity groups Is there an example of this being done somewhere as i am having problems understanding how to do this from the user guide.All i want to do is associate identity groups with ad groups.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a Cisco 3725 running IOS 12.3. I have three WAN connections (2 x 100Mb and 1 x 2Mb serial) and I need to replace the 2Mb serial connection with a further 100Mb connection. However, I have not got any spare 100Mb sockets.My plan is to use a switch that supports VLANs, connect the three WAN connections to the switch, each in their own VLAN, then connect the switch to one port on the router, configuring the switch port as a trunk (so that it passes all three VLANs across the link) and configuring the router so that for that single Ethernet interface, it has three subinterfaces each configured for a VLAN that matches the VLAN used for the corresponding WAN connection.
I am a bit rusty on my IOS so I wanted to run this all past the community for feedback. [code] Any thoughts on whether or not that will work? Are there any commands from the original interface configurations that I CANNOT use when moving them to a subinterface? I'm thinking that the speed & duplex commands need to be removed?