After clicking on below path we are not getting option as should be reflected. Below is the snapshots for the issues.
Access Policies > Access Services > Default Device Admin > Identity
I configured before ACS v4.2 to authenticate network devices using internal users at first, and if the user is not found use AD list users. But with v5.3 I have some problems doing this, on identity policies I use rule based result selection option, I configured 2 polices for Identity source, one for Internal Users and other policy for AD user, but it only works with the first policy, internal users or AD, but works only for the first policy identity. how to do that, if the user is not found on first policy, continue to the next policy.
View 7 Replies View Related[Env on my lab investigation]
supplicant - W7 with cert
authenticator - Catalyst 2960 with IOS 15.0(1)SE2 /newest/
authentication server 2x - W2008/NPS like a RADIUS server
The problem is the end station that are still connected to the supplicant port /use a EAP-TLS/ after the reboot supplicant! All of them will be put into the Guest VLAN instead of static VLAN 34!
[The question]
What is wrong and how to configure/tune and what authenticator or authentication server to prevent after the reboot to observe a authentication timeouts? Of course the supplicant after 20 minutes /next EAPOL start farmet put into VLAN 34.
[Code] ........
I just installed a new ACS 5.1 to authenticate wireless PEAP users, so I created an Access policy "WirelessUsers" with identity store being Windows Active directory and all domain users are selected, and create a service rule that dictates that if the authentication protocol is radius, network device belongs to WLC device group, the result service will be "WirelessUsers", so this part worked perfectely, all domain users are able to gain wireless access via their DOMAIN/usernames and domain passwords. Now I want ACS local indentity store users (those local usernames can be the same or different from their AD usernames) to be able to manage those controllers, so I created another access policy "DeviceAdminUsers" with identity store being local users, another service rule which says that if the authentication protocol is radius, network device belongs to WLC device group, the result service will be "DeviceAdminUsers". The problem is that with the setup, whenenve when I try to SSH to WLC, ACS always put me in "WirelessUsers" access policy, even the login name does not have DOMAIN pre-pended or the login name simly does not exist in AD. if I put the second rule in front of first rule, I am able to authenticate with ACS local username/password and gain access to WLC, but wireless users will fail to authenticate, because ACS is trying to put regular wiress users in "DeviceAdminUsers" access policy. I would expect if username does not exist in AD, ACS should proceed with next rule. Similar requirement was easily achieved in ACS 3.3.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to configure IP pool selection by RADIUS on ACS 5-3-0-40-7.So, I went to configuring the cisco-assign-ip-pool (Cisco VSA 218) attribute within some test authorization profile but discovered that cisco-assign-ip-pool is an integer (?!) and (therefore) accepts digits only.
As far as I can remember, we used to put pool *names* within ip:addr-pool
(something along those lines: cisco-avpair = "ip:addr-pool=test-pool-1").
So how should we configure the values for this attribute in ACS 5?
I'm working with an ACS 5.3 and ASA 8.2.5 and i've configured several access services for webvpn and ipsec remote access profiles but i haven't found which radius attribute can differentiate among them in the service selection rules.
View 5 Replies View Related- I have a cisco unified network (ACS 5.1, Cisco controller, LWAP) and have configured ACS to integrate with AD.
- I am using this network for Laptops and wireless IP phones access.
- I have only one Service Selection rule for both Laptops and wireless IP phones. All the conditions attributes are set to ANY except Protocol = Radius
- I select a simple Identity Policy and I use a sequence where IP phones users are authenticated using ACS local user and the Laptops users are authenticated using AD
- Laptop users are authenticated using PEAP and IP phones users using EAP-Fast
Everything is working fine BUT I need to make 2 changes and eventhough I spent many hours hours on forums and reading articles and trying things myself I can't get the changes to work.
The first change is to use 2 Service Selection Rules one for the IP phones and one for the Laptops. After adding another service selection rules that I put at the top, I tried many combinations to try and get the IP phones to use it but whatever I did (used different combinations of conditions), the IP phones always select the 2nd rule, which is the original one. The question is "what conditions to put in a service selection rule to make wireless IP phones use the rule).
The second change is that I want to add machine authentication so only Laptops that are in AD can access the network. AGain I tried various settings but can't get this to work.
I use ACS 5.3.0.40.8 with TACACS+ servicing Device AAA and RADIUS servicing the Cisco Wireless environment for AD user access. How can I implement 802.1x with the current RADIUS implementation with hindering current wireless users or am I hindered due to the EAP-GTC in use with PEAP via RADIUS?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'm migrating ACS 4.2 to ACS 5.2 for a customer and I'd like to find a service selection for TACACS+ protocol coming from an ASA.I use TACACS+ for device administration but also for AAA of internal users internet access.I also use RADIUS for vpn remote-access, without problems.How to distinguish through the ACS service selection ?
View 24 Replies View RelatedI have multiple campuses and a Central Admin...I've created Groups for all, except I need a few devices within Central to be available to the Campus Admins... (ie..a Cisco WCS System) How do I allow a device to be put into multiple NDG groups?
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe having ACS version 5.2 0.26 with Active/Standby. We need to integrate active directory with ACS. Domain name given by Server team was as xyzcompy.local. When I tried to resolve the same domain name I got five servers ip address against the same domain name. however we given the ip reachability to only for two servers. We we try to save we get error saying that "Can not resolve the network address".
So my questions are;
- does ACS should have ip reachaibility to all five servers
- does the username/password we entered in the ACS should have domain admin rights?.
- the given AD is configured with windows NTP [URL] but when we configured ACS as windows NTP it was taking local server as active NTP..?
When we check the ACS logs, we saw the following error;
in acsLocalStore:
AdminName=acsadmin, DomainName=qatarconvention.local, ADOperationResult=unable to create secured connection against AD server, switching to non-secured connection. javax.naming.CommunicationException: simple bind failed: qnccad02.xxxxconvention.local:636 [Root exception is java.net.SocketException: Connection reset],
in ACSADAgent;
32484]: INFO dns.findsrv FindSrvFromDns failed: res_query failed _ldap._tcp.xxxxconvention.local
Sep 4 12:43:20 acs01-cc4 adjoin[32484]: INFO cli.adjoin Join to domain 'xxxxconvention.local', zone 'null' failed.
I attached some screen print which saw the error and output of nslookup for the domain name.
I have successfully set up a windows 2008 box as a Radius server and use it to authenticate VPN users against ta AD database.I have also set up a similar policy that permits authentication for management purposes to all my networking devices (routers,switches and the ASA).Both policies work fine.Of course I don't want every VPN user to have administrative access to the ASA and every other device on my network.How can I discriminate between the 2 groups (VPN users and Network administrators)
View 3 Replies View Relatedwhat is the maximum number of AAA clients supported by a single ACS5.3 instance?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a question with regard to setting up the ID firewall on the ASA 5585 in a single forest, multiple domain windows network.Currently I have a semi-operational IDF at the top level but can't find users on the lower other domains, here is the setup:I have 3 domains.
[URL]
Both domains have a two way parent-child trust and I can look for users in AD Users/Computer on both domains. I initially setup the ASA to look at domain1.test.com using an LDAP aaa-server per the IDF instructions, and then proceeded to configure the ad-agent. I installed the adagent on the domain1.test.com domain controller configured the settings on that system and had no problem adding users to the firewall and getting functionality within domain1. I looked to see if I could see domain 2 and domain 3 users and found none. I went ahead and added the domain2 system to the adagent on the DC and the system says that it is up, but when I search for users is not pulling them from domain2. Instead, it shows domain1 users as domain2user1. I also configured another adserver in the ASA to search ldap on domain 2 to no avail.The cisco documentation states the following:•Before you configure even a single domain controller machine using the adacfg dc create command, ensure that the AD Agent machine is first joined to a domain (for example, domain J) that has a trust relationship with each and every domain (for example, domain D[i]) that it will monitor for user authentications (through the domain controller machines that you will be configuring on the AD Agent machine). Single Forest, Multiple Domains—All the domains in a single forest already have an inherent two-way trust relationship with each other. Thus, the AD Agent must first be joined to one of the domains, J, in this forest, with this domain J not necessarily being identical to any of the domains D[i] corresponding to the domain controller machines. Because of the inherent trust relationship between domain J and each of the domains D[i], there is no need to explicitly configure any trust relationships.Reading that it sounds like it should just work. I had everything properly configured before I installed the adagent, but I'm guessing that there is a chance that you can't have the adagent on the top level DC and get to communicate with the lower level domains.
I'm trying to test such 802.1x wired environment:windows xp sp3 as supplicant windows NPS as radius server 2960 as authenticator latest anyconnect (3.1.01065) + nam and standalone profile editor.I have a question: What is the difference between protected identity pattern and unprotected identity pattern (set in nam profile editor)? As I understand documentation PEAP-MSCHAPv2 is a tunneled method and it uses un- protected identity pattern to protect user's identity during phase 0. But if I use any fake identity here (anonymous, anonymous@[domain], etc) access is rejected (Access-Reject in switch debugs). I have to use exacly the same pattern in unprotected identity pattern as in protected identity pattern ([username] or [username]@[domain]) to gain access, regardless of authenticaton mode (same in machine only, user only authentication).
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a new Cisco Secure ACS 5.2 on a VM. We want to use it to for administrative access to our Cisco equipment with TACACS+. I am trying to map user permissions to different groups of devices based on active directory group membership, however it is not working.
I am using an LDAP (configured for secure authentication) external identity store. On the directory organization tab, I have confirmed the accuracy of the subject and group search base and the test configuration button shows that it's finding > 100 users and >100 groups.
On the directory groups page I have entered the groups according to the required format. cn=groupname1,ou=groups,dc=abc,dc=com
I have a rule based result selection under group mapping. I have two rules in the format below.
Conditon
LDAP:Externalgroups groupname1
Result
Identitygroup1
I have the default group set to a identity group named other. My problem is, no matter what user attempts to authenticate, the Default rule is applied, and the user is put into the other identity group.This occurs when I log on as a groupname1 user, groupname2 user, or as user that is not a member of either of those groups. LDAP authentication works and the user is able to logon to the device.
We are using ACS 5.2 and we are trying to create a Microsoft Active Directory (AD) Identity Store. We have a user to be used in the Active Directory creation General page and we would like to know how the test communication / ACS to AD communication takes place.
Our user is a predefined user in AD and has admin rights, but the password expires every 60 days. Will this affect the communication between AD and ACS 5.2 at everytime the entered user's password expires?
I'm currently looking for a solution in order to restrict the modification of the host internal identity store (add or delete MAC host) per group. The default administrator roles does not include "per group restriction". Under the ACS I defined one group per department? My objective it to allow each department to access their ACS MAC database to add or delete MAC addresses as required.
How to restrict internal identity store per group?Do I need to create new roles? and how?I was not able to get an answer from the ACS ADMIN manual.
I have a new ACS 5.3 configure and a ASA5550 to authenticate VPN users using a remote LDAP server. Once I try to authenticate the users with the ACS it gives me the error message "22056 Subject not found in the applicable identity store(s)."
I checked out the documentation and have already configure the Identity store sequences to redirect everything to the LDAP server, I also did the Bind test and it says that is ok, but I still have the same problem.
I validated the Access Policies Menu, and tried to create a new Service Selection Rules, but whet I get to the option of modifying the Identity option I get the error: "This System Failure occurred: {0}. Your changes have not been saved.Click OK to return to the list page. " and I'm not able to modify the identity, not in this new option I created, nor in the ones already created in the ACS.
I have two ACS v 5.2 (primary and secundary) and some users are in the internal stor and the others are in the AD.The local site topology is like this:
PC - AP - WLC - ACS - AD
Authentication method is PEAP(EAP-MSCHAPv2) and all user have the certificate company installed. The OS in the client users is Windows 7.Users was working fine but some users reports intranet disconnections. I see in the ACS log many "22056 Subject not found in the applicable identity store(s)." and "24415 User authentication against Active Directory failed since user's account is locked out" alarms.I believed it was because user wasn´t in the AD data base, but some times the same user is authenticated successfull and other i see the "22056...." or "24415...." alarms.
I switched the role for ACS primary to works as secundary and we see the same alarms.
I have ACS 5.2 running as a VM. I'm AD, then local authentication successfully for device access, but I want to define ACS user groups to restrict login. I don;t see any way to do this. If I use AD groups, they don;t show up as selection options on the policy screens, just the ACS locallyy defined groups.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have a ACS 4.3.2 installed with users authenticating against an Active Directory database. The AD database not only authenticate the users but also assigns the group that is used to select IP address pool.Now the requirements require to use token authentication with SafeNet. This authentication uses the same username but the password is composed of the original password + OTP.The problem is that the SafeNet server doesn't return the group membership.I've read about the Identity Store Sequence in ACS 5.x and I think I could use it in the following sequence:! configure an Authentication Sequence using the SafeNet token server (this works with ACS 4.x)I configure an Attribute Retrieval Sequence against the AD database. This would use the username only, no password and would retrieve the group membership.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm looking for Cisco ISE v1.1 to use the following licensing feature. url...Endpoint is dynamically profiled by Cisco ISE and assigned dynamically or statically to an endpoint identity group. Cisco ISE authorization rules do not use this endpoint identity group.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am currently running cisco ACS 5.1.0.44 and use active directory as the main authentication identity store to allow network administrators to have access to network devices in my organization .As per the established security policies in my organization , the ACS has to disable any account after 3 failed login attempts to any network devices .i have gone through all the settings oN the acs but couldn't find where or how it is done .
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have installed ACS 5.4 and we are looking to authenticate our Anyconnect users with ACS via Active Directory. I think I have the correct commands in our ASA ( we had ACS 4 and authenticated our anyconnect users ).
I also have configured ACS to use Active Directory and installed the server side cert in ACS. I'm just uncertain how to program ACS to use the security group that I have setup in Active Directory.
I have an ACS 5.3 cluster, that is configured to use AD. There are a few wireless devices, and monitoring tools that do not have AD accounts. I would like to configure ACS to first check AD for the user authentication, and if that fails to roll over to the local (Internal Users) identity source where I can define these user accounts.
It seems that when the authentication hits the initial Identity Policy rule, it never moves onto the next one if the first fails.
Attached are screen shots that show how i'm configured for the test, i have a local user defined and I'm trying to log into the firewalls.
- Identity Definition : Screen shot of the main ACS definition for the rule i'm testing that's not working
- Identity Rule 1 : The configuration of rule 1 that if it fails i need it to move onto rule 2.
- Log Output : Screen shot for one of the failed attempts from the ACS View Log server.
Reason I need to configure it this way is:
- Wireless users authenticate to wireless using AD user accounts. Some hand held scanners do not support that and will need to authenticate using the MAC address.
- Authentication to Network devices for managment uses AD accounts. We have some monitoring tools that do not have AD accounts, and will need to be able to log into Network devices to issue some commands (Examples: Cisco Prime LMS and NCS, Infoblox NetMRI).
how profiling works exactly ?How intelligent is the profiling engine, meaning: Will it discover that one device has more than one different MACs and will merge the entries in the database ??
Example:This is in fact the same device, there is only one WLC-2500 in the network ....If it can discover that, what needs to be configured on the ISE to do that ?
I have setup an Identity Firewall on a ASA version 5.6 on a DMZ interface.I have installed the ADAgent on a domain member Win2008 and configured as follows: [code]
where ashdew is a domain user and ACL 122(only one line) is applied on the dmz interface and NAT is properly configured.The ADagent has been properly tested and ASA can register to it.The ASA can connect to AD DC controller and query user database.I have placed a laptop ip 172.17.h.x on the DMZ and can ping the DMZ interface.
The laptop cannot authenticate on the domain and the asa does not seem to retrieve the user identity.Do I need to add extra rules in the access-list 122 to permit trafic to DC?Can I check on the AD Agent if it can retrieve the user to ip mapping ?
I understand that Cisco Secure ACS 5.3 supports the integration with existing external identity repositories such as Windows Active Directory and LDAP servers. In fact, in my environment, my ACS 5.3 is now integrated with AD and RSA.My question here is can Cisco Secure ACS 5.3 integrate with "multiple" WIndows AD, LDAP, RSA Server etc.? if yes, is there a Cisco document stating this? The keyword here is multipple.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am trying to setup PEAP authentication for wireless users but I got stuck at place where I have single ssid and users are store in different identity stores like some will be using their active directory and some are locally created users on ACS. I created separate service for wireless authentication and under that I am unable to create rule to differentiate them with identity stores. any idea how to achieve this.
I tried creating identity selection based on role but it does not work as for protocol like radius.peap,ms-chap ACS does not look for another identity store once user not find in an identity stores.
I need a specify users to allow access to particular devices and give privilege only for show command or show run. Here is how I tried to configured.
1. Configured two seperate Shell Profile and Command set with privilege level 4-5 and allowing only show run command
2. create seperate service selection rule with adding the require NDG and protocol TACACS and maching service "RestrictAccess"
3. In the RestrictAccess Service I have following configured; Identity: internal users, Group Mapping to a particular group where the user exists, authorization: matching the above created identity group, NDG, shell profile, command sets
All the steps are attached in the .doc file. However when I tried with the particular user he is able to access everything and he is not hitting the correct access rule.
We are running ISE 1.0.4 with a requirement that on the surface is simple, but fails to execute properly no matter how I tweak it it. It is:
VPN users either need to be within a certain AD group or They need to authenticate against RSA.
I set authentication to use an identitysequence with RSA listed first, then AD second.
I set authorization to check identity server (using network access:AuthenticationIdentityStore).
- If it’s RSA, pass it.
- If it’s Active directory, AND the condition with a check on that group membership. Pass if both pass.
- Set the default authorization rule to deny access.
This should work. Here’s where it breaks down. It all stems from the fact that the same userIds exist in RSA and AD and that ISE steadfastly refuses to attempt the second identity server method listed in the sequence if RSA is listed first.
• If I list RSA first and the “authentication failed” policy is set to Reject: For users not in RSA that I want to authenticate against AD, it rejects – it attempts against RSA but never hits AD (second server listed in the Identity sequence). This is what is brokenThis works for users in RSA
• If I list the RSA server first and the “authentication failed” policy is set to continue Users not in RSA will pass authentication that shouldn’t because the network access: AuthenticationIdentityStore value will be pointing to the RSA server, regardless of whether they actually passed to that server or not.Effectively users can connect regardless of whether their password is right or notThis option sets it to proceed from authentication to authorization
• If I list AD first in the sequence Since the same ID exists in both AD and RSA, it’ll fail as bad password against AD. It'll never attempt against RSA.
Am I missing a simple fix for this? I have a testbed in which I can simulate the issue but since I don’t have an RSA server handy, I’m using an identity sequence with AD and fallback to internal. It works as I’d expect, falling back from AD to local if the user doesn't exist in AD. If the user is in AD, it never tries local and shows the attempt as a bad password.
how to associate an AD group - which i have defined in users and identity stores/external identity stores/Active Directory/Directory attributes to associate with the relevant identity groups - Users and identity stores/identity groups Is there an example of this being done somewhere as i am having problems understanding how to do this from the user guide.All i want to do is associate identity groups with ad groups.
View 3 Replies View Related