Cisco Application :: N55-D160L3-V2 Be Installed For Layer 3 Performance
Oct 9, 2012For the Cisco Nexus 5548P chassis, must the N55-D160L3-V2 (Nexus 5548 Layer 3 Daughter Card, Version 2) be installed for Layer 3 performance.
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Connection With N55-D160L3 On Nexus 5548P For Layer 3
Oct 13, 2011The module just won't come up. Stays in off-line state. On two identical 5Ks, so its not hardware failure.Have the licenses and running code 5.0(3)N2(2).
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco :: Application Layer Service The Same As Application Layer Software?
Apr 3, 2012I am taking an introduction class to CCNA and we are focusing on the Application Layer,and I'm having some difficulty in understanding what is an Application Layer Service. Is the Application Layer Service the same as Application Layer Software?
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco WAN :: ME 3400E Series - Routing Performance (Layer 3)?
Jan 1, 2013On the datasheet, product specifications are for forwarding only :
Forwarding bandwidth:
• Cisco ME 3400EG-12CS AC or DC: 32 Gbps
• Cisco ME 3400EG-2CS AC: 8 Gbps
• Cisco ME 3400E-24TS, AC or DC: 8 Gbps
Forwarding rate:
• Cisco ME 3400EG-12CS, AC or DC: 26 mpps
• Cisco ME 3400EG-2CS AC: 6.5 mpps
• Cisco ME 3400E-24TS, AC or DC: 6.5 mpps
where can I find the performance for routing (layer 3) for this product ?
Cisco Application :: ACE 4710 Lic Performance
Mar 19, 2012With the current (A5) ACE 4710 lic setup, does the "X gigabit per second appliance throughput" that is licensed affect: -
A) Only "appliance" i.e. load balancing traffic, any other normal routed traffic is not included in the limit
or
B) Is it an overall throughput limit on the interfaces i.e. includes all traffic not only load balancing traffic but also normal routed traffic crossing the appliance
Looking at a scenario where the lic size I need for HTTP load balanacing would be one size if A) but would need to be much larger is B) to accomodate out of hours routed backup traffic crossing the ACE 4710
Cisco Application :: CSS V ACE 4710 Performance Comparison
Mar 19, 2012Am trying to verify performance figures for a CSS 11503 EOL replacement using ACE 4710
Trying to comapre apples with apples (is a CSS SSL TPS the same as a ACE 4710 TPS etc...)
Pulling figures from data sheets, release notes etc I have only come up with the following
Is there any further figures available for the ACE 4710 to fill in the blanks in table?
Am sure that ACE 4710 smokes the CSS but have to do the due diligence
<TR style="HEIGHT: 30pt" mcestyle="height: 30pt;">
<TD style="WIDTH: 170pt; HEIGHT: 30pt" height=40 width=226 mcestyle="width: 170pt; height: 30pt;"> Metric</TD>
[Code].....
Cisco Switches :: SG300 Switches Have Poor Performance In Layer 3?
Jan 1, 2013We have several of the SG300 Serices switches. We use them to route VLAN traffic to Remote Offices, Internet Connections, and WiFi Access Points.In one remote office we have a SG300-10 setup to route the HQ Network and the remote Office Subnet. The SG300 is Connected to HQ via Fiber and has multiple Tagged VLANs on it. If I do speed tests over the Fiber Link on the Incoming Tagged Netwotk I get Decent performance, 80Mbs. If I switch to a networtk that is not priginating from HQ, and have the SG300-10 route packet, I get dismal performance. 15-20Mbs.
I Fireded up a New SG300-28P FW v1.2.7.76. Added a the HQ VLAN 101 and new VLAN 1025 . Mapped some Tagged and untagged ports for each. Switch was connected to HQ Network as untagged VLAN 101. I put a laptop on an Untagged VLAN 101 port. Ran some tests, cam back with 750-850Mbs. Great. Put the same laptop on a Tagged 101 Port, Configured the NIC for Tagged VLAN 101, Same test, same Speeds, 750-850Mbs.I then Configured laptop for Tagged VLAN 1025. Connected to tagged VLAN 1025 port. Ran speed tests, resuts were 15-20Mbs!
I then Configured laptop for Untagged VLAN 1025. Connected to unagged VLAN 1025 port. Ran speed tests, resuts were 15-20Mbs!It was only the Laptop and the Connection to the HQ net on the SG300-28P. Why is the performance of this unit soooooo poor when it needs to route?Other Switches have FW v1.0.0.27 or FW v1.1.2.0. They have Similar speed issues. All Configured for Layer 3.
Cisco Application :: ACE20 Module Upgrade Performance
Jun 28, 2011I have a ACE20 module with a performance of 4 Gbps. I want to upgrade the performance from 4 Gbps to 8 Gbps. Is correct the following SKU for the upgrade?
ACE30-UPG-08-K9=ACE10 or ACE20 to ACE30 Upgrade for 8 Gbps Throughput
And if i want to upgrade the performance to 16Gbps is correct the sku?
ACE30-UPG-16-K9=ACE10 or ACE20 to ACE30 Upgrade for 16 Gbps Throughput
I noticed that the price list of both codes is the same....
Is it right for the SKUs listed I get the new module with the performance ACE30 requested?
Cisco Application :: ACE 4710 SSL Performance (TPS) For 2048bit Keys?
Apr 18, 2013Any info about the SSL performance for 2kb keys on ACE4710? There is only SSL performance for 1024b keys on ACE4710 (7500 SSL TPS) in the data sheet.
View 5 Replies View RelatedCisco Application :: CSS 11503 V ACE 4710 Performance Comparison
Mar 20, 2012Am trying to verify performance figures for ACE 4710 as EOL replacement for a CSS 11503 Am sure that the ACE 4710 smokes the CSS but have to complete the due diligence
Pulling figures from data sheets, release notes etc.. I have only come up with the followingIs there any further figures available for the ACE 4710 to fill in the blanks in table?
Cisco Application :: Failed Installing Performance License On ACE 4710
Sep 5, 2012I'm trying to install performance license on ACE 4710 appliance and it was failed. [code]
View 11 Replies View RelatedCisco Routers :: RVO42 / 4400 N - SIP Application Layer Gateway Disable
Jul 22, 2012We use a phone system that requires SIP Application Layer Gateway to be disabled on the router. We replaced the older RVO42 routers with the WRVS4400N routers and the VOIP phone works fine with this check mark option disabled.
Does the new RVO42 router allow you to disable this option? I did not find it in the manual so far. I do not want to buy two routers and find that it will not work with the phone system. We need Dual WAN this time so I thought we would try RVO42 model again as long as it is the latest version. Any issues with newer RV042, RVO82 with NEC VOIP phone systems?
Cisco Application :: CSS 11503 - Layer 5 Content Rule Match Wildcard And Suffix
Oct 2, 2011Is it possible on the CSS11503 to create a layer 5 content rule that matches a url "/*/_edit".
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: N55-D160L3 Daughter Board For Nexus5548P Support Netflow?
Dec 5, 2011I know the Nexus 5548P hardware does not support Netflow.I just need to know that if we introduce the layer 3 Daughter Board N55-D160L3 does this add Netflow support?
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Sg300 And SLM2024 VLAN As Layer 2 And Layer 3 Switches Connection
Mar 18, 2012I want to setup VLAN with the switches SG300 and SLM2024. What is the suggestion to connect these 2 switches. We have the Juniper net screen.
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Infrastructure :: Stacking Catalyst 3750 Layer 2 And Layer 3
Nov 15, 2011I have a question if I Stack a Catalyst 3750 L3 with a Catalyst just L2, will we able to use all L3 capabilities?
Switches are
WS-C3750G-24TS-E1U
WS-C3750V2-24PS-S
Cisco Application :: ACE20 - Config Application In Progress Message
Dec 3, 2012Everytime I make a config change to one of the contexts on our ACE20, I get this message: Config Application in Progress. This command is queued to the system
If I run show download info, I get:
context : context1
Interface Download-status
--------------------------------------------------------------
187 In Progress
199 Pending
Regex download optimization status : Couldn't get status[TNRPC Timed out]
It eventually seems to complete, but it takes a very, very long time. We are running Version A2(3.5) [build 3.0(0)A2(3.5)].
Cisco Application :: Application Slowness Through ACE 4710
Mar 27, 2013Report run via Individual Web server URL’sThe report takes less than 20 minutes (average 15 minutes) to fetch and return the data. This is observed 9 out of 10 times.Report run via ACE Load Balanced URLThe report keeps on running for more than 20 minutes and never completes. The front end keeps showing report is running.The data in general when tested directly by running queries against the database (bypassing the platform) completes in 15-18 minutesThe network connectivity for each and every ports involved (Loadbalancer/Servers) have been throulgly checked.
View 6 Replies View RelatedCisco WAN :: 851 How To Improve Performance
Jul 1, 2011I have a cisco851 and is currently configured this way.
1 .- This well configured?
2 .- the internet encourages me a little as I can improve
3. - how I can improve the performance
Cisco AAA/Identity/Nac :: How To Get Any Numbers Regarding Performance For ACS V.5
Aug 17, 2012How to get any numbers regarding performance for acs v.5 ? I have looked through the documents but couldnt really get any idea. Especially in a WLAN environment - how many clients can use one appliance as primary without putting the primary under strong load ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco VPN :: Performance Of 3925 Router?
Jul 6, 2011I have spend half day to look up this question in cisco official web site, but get nothing . Any infomation about vpn performance of 3925 router？Produce : cisco 3925 ( Cisco 3925 Security Bundle w/SEC license PAK )Question is , how much ipsec vpn tunnels can be carried as a vpn server of this bundle ? if more licenses may be bought, how much most tunnels can be held？
View 5 Replies View RelatedCisco VPN :: 5520 Should SSL VPN Performance Be On Par With IPSEC
May 22, 2010Currently running a pair of 5520 as VPN routers. running 8.0.3, been using only Anyconnect SSL VPN for end users. These boxes do nothing else except serve VPN clients.However, recently we tried testing some IPSEC clients and are realizing that the Anyconnect SSL VPN clients is about 10x slower than the IPSEC client.From my house, downloading either CIFS or FTP, I can pull pretty close to 1.0mbps, while using Anyconnect, I pull 0.1mbps. What could be causing this slowdown? Should SSL VPN performance be on par with IPSEC? Clients all are windows 7, 64 bit. and the testing is being conducted on the same device.
View 8 Replies View RelatedCisco WAN :: Performance For 7600 / 6509 With SP-720
Dec 7, 2010I would like more information of performance to 7600 router with the SP-720, how many sessions full bgp routing it supports? I have 4 links 1 GB and a throughput of 900 MB.
View 4 Replies View RelatedCisco WAN :: Netflow Performance On 1841
Jan 10, 2011We have a 1841 router and would like to enable netflow. Will this degrade the router's CPU and memory performance.
1841>sh verCisco IOS Software, 1841 Software (C1841-IPBASE-M), Version 12.4(1c), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)Technical Support: [URL] Copyright (c) 1986-2005 by Cisco Systems, Inc.Compiled Tue 25-Oct-05 17:10 by evmiller
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.4(13r)T, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
1841 uptime is 1 day, 4 hours, 47 minutesSystem returned to ROM by power-onSystem restarted at 11:04:25 MYT Mon Jan 10 2011System image file is "flash:c1841-ipbase-mz.124-1c.bin"
Cisco 1841 (revision 7.0) with 114688K/16384K bytes of memory.Processor board ID FCZ113311Y62 FastEthernet interfacesDRAM configuration is 64 bits wide with parity disabled.191K bytes of NVRAM.31360K bytes of ATA CompactFlash (Read/Write)
Configuration register is 0x2102
Cisco VPN :: ASA 5520 IPsec VPN Performance?
Feb 17, 2011I have a client that uses the ASA 5520 as both a firewall and VPN termination device. Day to day VPN usage is 30-50 users and the memory (512 MB) is typically at 50% while the CPU is mostly under 30%. I've suggested the RAM be upgrade to 1GB.The client would like to add a large block of VPN users which could see 250-300 concurrent users. What kind of a system resource hit should the expect with this level of load?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco WAN :: Why 2811 Performance Is So Slow
Dec 18, 2011I recently inherited a small network. There is an existing 1.5mbps Internet connection (fa0/0) (includes MPLS as well/same provider). We added a new ISP that allows for 50mb down/5mb up. I added the new ISP to fa0/1 and modified the NAT overload statements accordingly. I alo changed the default route to ONLY use the new, faster ISP connection. Using speedguide.net, I am only able to get 6 to 10mb down, most of the time. if I plug a laptop into the cable modem then I get 37 to 50mb down. Why the 2811 is so slow?
I have attached the config and various show outputs (nat, sh ver, memory, etc.). the file called "latest logs" contains a "sh ip traffic, sh int switching and a sh proc cpu sorted". [code]
Cisco VPN :: RV042 Slow VPN Performance
Feb 9, 2011I'm experiencing quite a slow vpn performance. I've tested different scenarios.
* Windows XP with built-ín pptp client and Shrew ipsec client
* Linux built-in pptp
* wireless and wired connections
I never managed to go above 1MBps neither with windows or linux. I managed to go up to 3MBps using the Shrew client.I've also checked mtu settings and everything seems to be fine.
Cisco VPN :: 2811 IPSec Performance
Jul 25, 2011I am having problems with CPU load on 2811 with AIM-VPN-II. There is a GRE+IPSec over E3 WAN link and the authentication is done using RSA, but even that there is around 10Mb/s of traffic I have a 70 - 85%. I also have another WAN link with router 2811 that doesn't have a AIM-VPN, and that one reach 95% CPU once the traffic goes up to 5 Mb/s.
crypto isakmp policy 10
encr aes
authentication rsa-encr
[Code]....
Are there any recommendations that RSA authentication is not supportted for hardward encryption? It worries me, becouse have more sitautions like this.
Cisco WAN :: 1841 - Very Slow Performance
Jan 29, 2011Below is configuration for 1841 and causing slowness both from inside and outside connections?
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 2784 bytes!version 12.4service timestamps debug datetime msecservice timestamps log datetime msecno service password-encryption!hostname Router!boot-start-markerboot-end-marker!no logging bufferedno logging monitorenable password password!no aaa new-model!resource policy!mmi polling-interval 60no mmi auto-configureno mmi pvcmmi snmp-timeout 180ip subnet-zeroip cef!!no ip dhcp use vrf connectedip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.50!ip dhcp pool 0 network 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 netbios-node-type h-node
[Code] .......
Inconsistent Performance Through Repeater
Jan 1, 2013I have a fairly large area to cover with wireless, and set up a second router to act as a repeater. The signal works great, other than being extremely inconsistent. Sometimes I get a speedtest of 18 ping and 7 mbps DL to a nearby server, and 10 seconds later it's 300 ping and 2 mbps. There are no problems when using the primary access point without the repeater. Where should I start in troubleshooting? I can't see why there would be such terrible consistency since much of the time the signal strength is fine. It's purely a problem of dropping the connection often.
View 1 Replies View RelatedPerformance Of Remote Desktop Using VPN?
Sep 20, 2011Can i build a Server through Remote Desktop using VPN, how will be the performance? Is it advisable ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedD-Link DIR-825 :: Rev A Serious Performance Reboots
Feb 17, 2012I continue to have significant performance and random reboots with DIR-825 router (hardware: Rev A1; Firmware: 1.13NA). My ISP has checked the lines to my cable modem. If I connect any of my laptops or PCs directly to the cable modem and work off the direct connect, all works fine with no problems for many days and even mutliple weeks. So, the router seems to be the bottleneck/issue.
I've tried multiple settings changes as listed in the forum here. My setup is fairly simple and detailed below.
Setup -> Internet:
-- Dynamic IP (DHCP)
-- I have disabled "Enable Advanced DNS Service"
-- "Use Unicasting" is enabled
-- I have primary and secondary DNS servers set
[Code]....
Cisco :: Low Performance When Connecting Switch To Port 5?
Jun 14, 2012I'm new here but I'm not really new to networking. I manage small network but I just found out that I have some issues regards to speed.So what's the problemAs a main router/fw we have Fortigate 100A which then goes to a core switch SRW2016.This switch then handles two VLANS.The problem is that I have ports 5 assigned to VLAN 100 and port 6 to VLAN 101. They relate to DMZ1 (VLAN100) or internal (VLAN101).When I connect small unmanageable switch to port 5 I get very low performance (20kB/s internet, 2-3MB/s LAN) however when I plug in PC directly, I'm getting full speed.Port 6 with VLAN101 has the same unamangeable switch but no issues.Obviously you're thinking it's the switch - well I've tried replacing it allready. It's not the switch.Both ports have the same configuration (relating to their VLAN) but resolving it goes beyond my knowledge
View 12 Replies View Related
