Cisco Switches :: SG300 Switches Have Poor Performance In Layer 3?

Jan 1, 2013

We have several of the SG300 Serices switches. We use them to route VLAN traffic to Remote Offices, Internet Connections, and WiFi Access Points.In one remote office we have a SG300-10 setup to route the HQ Network and the remote Office Subnet. The SG300 is Connected to HQ via Fiber and has multiple Tagged VLANs on it. If I do speed tests over the Fiber Link on the Incoming Tagged Netwotk I get Decent performance, 80Mbs. If I switch to a networtk that is not priginating from HQ, and have the SG300-10 route packet, I get dismal performance. 15-20Mbs.
 
I Fireded up a New SG300-28P FW v1.2.7.76. Added a the HQ VLAN 101 and new VLAN 1025 . Mapped some Tagged and untagged ports for each.  Switch was connected to HQ Network as untagged VLAN 101.  I put a laptop on an Untagged VLAN 101 port. Ran some tests, cam back with 750-850Mbs. Great.  Put the same laptop on a Tagged 101 Port, Configured the NIC for Tagged VLAN 101, Same test, same Speeds, 750-850Mbs.I then  Configured laptop for Tagged VLAN 1025. Connected to tagged VLAN 1025 port. Ran speed tests, resuts were 15-20Mbs!
 
I then  Configured laptop for Untagged VLAN 1025. Connected to unagged VLAN 1025 port. Ran speed tests, resuts were 15-20Mbs!It was only the Laptop and the Connection to the HQ net on the SG300-28P. Why is the performance of this unit soooooo poor when it needs to route?Other Switches have FW v1.0.0.27 or FW v1.1.2.0. They have Similar speed issues. All Configured for Layer 3.

View 10 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Sg300 And SLM2024 VLAN As Layer 2 And Layer 3 Switches Connection

Mar 18, 2012

I want to setup VLAN with the switches SG300 and SLM2024. What is the suggestion to connect these 2 switches. We have the Juniper net screen.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: SG300 In Layer 3 For Routing Over MetroE

May 12, 2013

I have a project I am working on that will require routing over a MetroE circuit to connect a few sites together back to HQ. Although, I know this can be accomplished several ways, I have come up with a solution that I think will work, but would like you all's input as to whether this is adequate and if my thoughts on how to properly "organize" the network are right.
 
I have been working with the SG300 line in Layer 3 mode and have not had any issues in a test setup I have here in the office. Basically my thought is to have a single VLAN/subnet allocated for each physical site. That will handle the basic interoffice connectivity etc. I also have a need to prioritize voice/video traffic throughout the entire network. My plan was to create an additional VLAN/subnet to house the teleconferencing equipment. Thats pretty much the jist of the setup. My only question is how to properly prioritize the voice/video VLAN.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: SG300 - Setting Management Interface In Layer 3 Mode

Jun 13, 2012

How to set the management interface on a SG300 Switch in Layer 3 mode? I've some vlans configured on the switch with interfaces in each of them:
 
Vlan 100 (10.0.1.254 /24)
Vlan 200 (10.0.2.254 /24)
Vlan 300 (10.0.3.254 /24)
...
Vlan 900 (10.0.9.254 /24)
 
Now, the management interface is listening on all interfaces (IPs). But I would like to configure the switch to only listen on 10.0.9.254. What I need to configure or whether it is possible?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: How To Config VLAN On 2 Switches SF300-24 Layer 3

Oct 6, 2011

now we have 2 switches: SF300-24..on one SF300-24 we config it at layer 3 mode with VLAN configuration same as following [code] And we use port 26 on 2 switches SF300-24 is trunk mode then we connect both SF300-24 switches.But on SF300-24 layer 2 cann't inderstand VLAN from Sf300-24 layer 3..How to config VLAN on 2 switches SF300-24 Layer 3 and SF300-24 layer 2?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: Replacing 3COM 4500 Switches With SG300-52?

Nov 21, 2011

I'm replacing 2 3COM 4500 Swithes with the SG300-52 Cisco switch. We have 3 VLANs, 10, 20, 100. The switch is set for Layer 3 and I have setup DHCP relay. what settings i should set on the Cisco for the following setups:
 
3COM Setup
#
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1

[Code].....

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: SG300 Switches Can Be Used With Microsoft NLB In Multicast Mode

Dec 18, 2011

does the SG300 switches can be used with Microsoft NLB in Multicast mode?I know on traditional Catalyst switches you can statically "map" IP's to mac's and then to multiple ports but this doesn't seem to work correctly on the SG switches - it gives an error about the mac not being not Unicast?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: VLAN Management Via SNMP On SG300-10 Switches

Aug 7, 2011

Any snmpset commands to add, modify and delete vlan table entries on SG300-10 switches? I checked url... however this information is apparently only valid for catalysts. The latest firmware is installed and the provided MIB files are used.

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: Multiple VLANS And SG300-28P Switches Setup?

Aug 20, 2012

I'm going to have several SG300-28P switches to setup.  I'll need to create multiple vlans for data, voice, and wireless traffic.  I have the following questions in setting up this configuration:
 
VLAN 1 Management
VLAN 100 Data
VLAN 200 Wireless
VLAN 300 Voice 
 
1) For managing the switches via IP, will LAN1 be the default management network?  Should I create a seperate VLAN for managing the switches?
 
2) For uplinking the switches together, I plan to trunk a port to connect the switches together.  What's the configuration on the trunk port to forward all vlans from one switch to another?
 
3) On some ports, I want to configure a trunk for two vlans (Data and Voice) where the phone has a pass through for PC.  The phone supports tagging for the PC and the VoIP traffic.  For example on port 10, would VLAN 100 and 300 be set to tagged?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: SG300-52 Multiple Lags Between Switches?

Jan 19, 2012

I'm having alot of trouble trying to connect more that one LAG between two SG300-52 switches.Basically i have configured both switches with the same vlans. For 2 of the vlans i would like to connect them together between the two switches using LAG. Switch1 has Vlan 5 (ports 1-12) & Vlan 10 (Ports 25-36) with LAG configured on ports 1-2 and ports 25-26. I have setup the second switch identical to the first. But when i connect the LAG's there is no connectivty. If i disconnect one LAG the other starts working.Can you only have i interconnect LAG between switches?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: How To Configure Two Links Between Switches SG300

Apr 22, 2012

I have two SG300 serie switches and two Gigabit connection between them. How do I configured these two links to work toghether like a one 2 Gigabit channel?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: SG300-28 GUI Different Than Online SG300-48 Simulator

Aug 29, 2011

These are our first switches and seems like GUI is lot different than the online. Out intervlan routing is o not working. I am absolutely sure that I setup the switch in L3 mode since it allows me to create mutiple interfaces. I am hoping that this GUI issue is related to interVLAN routing.
 
Below is the blog I started for InterVlan issue [URL]
 
This is the link for online simulator and what I see in its IP tab. I know this switch is not SG300. [URL]
 
This is what I see on our switch.
 
Our switch version
switchd64684#show version                                                                                                                                              
SW version    1.1.0.73 ( date  19-Jun-2011 time  18:10:49 )
Boot version    1.0.0.4 ( date  08-Apr-2010 time  16:37:57 )
HW version    V01

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: SG300-28P And SG300-52 Web Managing - Fans

May 26, 2011

1) I have a Cisco SG300-28P. I plan to add a SG300-52. Would it be possible to manage the new switch through the SG300-28P web browser ?

2) There are 2 fans in the POE model SG300-28P. How many fans are they in the non POE switch SG300-52 ?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: SG300-28 Uplink To Another SG300-28?

Feb 8, 2012

Can I connect a single Cat5e cable between two SG300-28 and link them?  If so what must I configure?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: Difference Between SG300-28P And SG300-52

Jul 25, 2012

I have SG300-28P that I am using as layer-3 switch. Recently I ran in to SG300-52 switch and even though loading same firmware doesn't give me option to do layer-3 switching. For SG-300 I see options in GUI to create vlan interfaces under IP information section, while SG300-52 has IP information option only under the management section.let me know if these are 2 different hardware types and L3 is not possible on SG300-52. If its possible to enable L3 switching on SG300-52?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: SG-200-08 - Poor UDP Speed

May 3, 2013

I'm experiencing poor udp speed on my sg-200-08. I'm running a nfs share on Ubuntu server 12.04  to a Ubuntu 11.10 client connected through udp protocol . If I use an un managed site com (plastic ****) I get about 50MB/s transfers, with sg-200-08 I can't get over 12/13 MBs transfers.

I've tried to set on both server and client MTU = 1492 and I've changed firmware from 1.0.3.3 to 1.0.5.1 (I've not tested 1.0.6 because of some posts here regarding udp problems).

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: ESW540 Performance Degradation To 100Mb When Using

Nov 27, 2011

I have three ESW-540-24 10/100/1000 Switches in a small school environment
 
1. ESW performs as a server switch for out small cluster of VMWare ESXi Hosts and iSCSI SAN with a link-aggregation/lacp/etherchannel connection to the backbone switch, and a Link-Aggregated Connection to the thrid ESW switch via a multimode optic fibre link to a near-site backup and DR location
 
2. The second ESW acting as network backbone links back to the server switch and our older LinksysSRW224G4 (four SRW224G4s) switches using Aggregated Links / LACP to reduce bandwidth contention and allow for link redundancy
 
3. The third ESW as mentioned previously is at the backup DR location linked back to Switch 1
 
When using Single 1GB links between these three switches I can almost saturate the 1GB link (80-95% utilisation) as soon as link aggregation is configured by bonding 2x 1GB links together to form an etherchannel link utilisation will not exceed 100MB (network monitor graph on a server/ workstation runs flat at 10% utilisation) I have tested this multiple times useing large file transfers accross our SANs (which have high enough throughput to saturate links) and can confirm that performance degradation occurs as soon as an etherchannel is configured on the same ports (regardless of manually setting admin speed and duplex of copper ports etc) all indicators specify that ports are running at 1GB even though throughput REDUCES by 90%.
 
We are not running the latest  firmware yet (2.0.3), however I have read the release notes for newer versions (2.1.16 and 2.1.19) and there is no indication of a fix for etherchannel/lacp performance issues.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: C1861 And ZBF Performance With Download Is Poor

May 1, 2011

having a very strange problem with a Cisco 1861 running - Cisco IOS Software, C1861 Software (C1861-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 12.4(24)T5
 
The issue  -I  have suddenly started to get performance issues with downloads and  access through the ZBF. Without the firewall enabled and just having NAT  enabled and routing  , downloads perform as expected - ( have been  using Itunes download as test file ) - with the ZBF enabled , and the  necessary rules installed to inspect & allow traffic - downloads  stall - and the only way to get the downlaod to start again is to pause ,  then resume. The stalls are anything between the first 25 - 120 secs.
 
I  have debugged and performed packet traces - but cant see anything  untoward. I have also placed another router ( just a cheap Belkin )  on  the ADSL service and again , the downloads work as expected.
 
one  further thing to add is that when im tunneling through the firewall (  VPN ) , then downloads do work as expected - suggesting that the issue  is with native HTTP(s) traffic.

I  have upgraded from T4 to T5 - and the symptons still remain - I am  thinking that these may have been introduced when i upgraded to T4 a few  monthes ago.

View 3 Replies View Related

Why Layer 2 Switches Need Mac Address Even It Does Not Have Any Interface

Dec 27, 2011

Why layer 2 switches need its mac address, even it does not have any interface ? (does not have stp and etc)

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: 300 Layer 3 Routing And Proxy ARP

Jul 12, 2012

I have a situation where I have ethernet traffic from two separate networks/ip subnets (Subnet A and Subnet B) on a single ethernet connection.  I have the need to separate the traffic into two separate networks and two isolated broadcast domains.  I thought this could easily be accomplished with a Cisco 300 Layer 3 switch, but I can't get it to work correctly. I have the switch set to IP routing mode.  I have three VLANs configured.  VLAN 1 sees the combined Layer 2 & 3 ethernet traffic for both subnet A and subnet B.  VLAN 10 has an IP address assigned from subnet A and is the gateway for devices within that subnet.  VLAN 20 has an IP address assigned from subnet B and is the gateway for devices within that subnet. IP proxy arp is on by default and should be active.Devices in VLAN 10 can ping devices in VLAN 20 and devices in VLAN 20 can ping devices in VLAN 10.  This appears to be working only because the switch is the default gateway for those components. 
 
No devices or servers in VLAN 1 can ping VLAN 10 or VLAN 20 components, and VLAN 10 and VLAN  20  components can not ping VLAN 1.  I analyzed the ARP traffic on VLAN 1 and the switch  is not responding with its own MAC address for requests for IPs for active devices connected to VLAN 10 or VLAN 20.  The Cisco documentation says that the device should be responding and acting as a router.I can not physically connect everthing on VLAN 1 directly to the switch, I can not make the switch the default gaeway for all devices on VLAN 1, and I can not create static routes directly to the VLAN 1 switch IP address for all devices that are part of VLAN 1, so I am stuck.  I need the switch to let VLAN 1 components automatically know what is connected to VLAN 10 and VLAN 20.
 
I am willing to scrap this approach entirely if there is an easier way to do this.  Put simply, I have a few devices in Subnet A that need to be isolated from Layer 2 & 3 traffic destined for a few devices in Subnet B, but I can't reconfigure my entire network to create these isolated broadcast domains.      

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: SGE2000P - Layer 3 Setup?

May 29, 2012

We have a potential new customer who is wanting to deploy a guest WLAN. I am happy doing this via a VLAN on the WAP4410N series AP’s. I would then create the relevant VLAN’s on the switch. Can each VLAN be assigned an IP address and allowing me to be able to add a static route on the router pointing the traffic for the Guest VLAN back to the switch? 

View 1 Replies View Related

Poor Network Performance On Belkin Router?

Nov 30, 2012

I run my virgin broadband through an old NTL modem and a Belkin router. I haveit all attached to a computer in my study along with a new 6TB Buffalo Nas drive. The computer has GIGABIT LAN. I use Belkin powerline units to relay the network around the house. In my lounge i have a blu ray player, AV amp and my sky box attached to the network via the Belkin powerline units and all run ok. This week i have added a Cambridge audio streamer but i am suffering now from a lot of dropouts and network failures escpecially when trying to stream music from my NAS. all seem to be set up correctly as per the manuals. I have spent a lot on this unit specificallly to stream my music so this is really important to get working correctly The powerline units can flash blue (fast ) or orange (slower) but i only see the orange light .My local dealer says i need to upgrade my Modem/Router and has suggested an ASUS RT-N66U which I understand is a modern 2.5/5ghz model . he says my system is overloaded

A few questions.

Is this a suitable modem for me to use on my Virgin cable broadband? (apparently there are two alternatives types of modem/router)
Is there a better alternative unit ?
Could there be another cause for my problems and if so how do i diagnose them ?

View 7 Replies View Related

D-Link DIR-655 :: Poor Performance / Mostly Windows Computers

Feb 5, 2012

I replaced a Dir-655 at a coffee shop, with a new dir-655 a few weeks ago.  They keep calling and saying that Windows clients are not working and that Mac clients do.My first thought is that they are overloading the router but I would think that all computers would have problems not just the Windows computers. could the router be so bogged down that it takes to long for DHCP request for windows computers assigning the IP twice?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: PPTP Performance Through ASA5520 Very Poor?

Nov 13, 2011

We use MS RRAS services behind a Cisco ASA 5520. In testing the performance I have found that we can only get a little over 2MB of througput when connected to the VPN server over a broadband connection. I have verified that the issue is not the RRAS server itself as I can connect to VPN from the LAN and the througput tests at 300-400MB. I also connected to the LAN directly on the outside of the firewall and only get 4 or 5 MB from there which does not seem right. None of the switches are showing any errors. I believe that I have the passthrough stuff setup as I should. I even went through these steps as recommended by Cisco.
 
hostname(config)# class-map pptp-port
hostname(config-cmap)# match port tcp eq 1723
hostname(config-cmap)# exit
hostname(config)# policy-map pptp_policy
hostname(config-pmap)# class pptp-port
hostname(config-pmap-c)# inspect pptp
hostname(config-pmap-c)# exit
hostname(config)# service-policy pptp_policy interface outside

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Wireless :: WAP4410N Poor Bridge Performance

Apr 4, 2011

I am using 2 WAP4410N in bridge mode with WPA2 Security.The bridge seems to be stable but i get poor transfer rates.Distance between devices ~ 8m - nothing between.Wireless networkmode: N-Only, Channel: Auto, Channel Bandwitdh: 40MHz (also tried auto and 20MHz)Firmware 2.0.2.1 because got different problems with 2.0.3.3One side is connected to my LAN other is connected to a notebook.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Infrastructure :: Poor Performance On Catalyst 4006 Sup II

Apr 3, 2003

I have a Catalyst 4006 with Supervisor II engine. I have 48 port 10/100/1000 blades installed in it for connection to my servers. I am having a lot of problems with performance when connecting servers that are using 100 MB NICs. The speed of the connection is really bad. I have attempted setting the ports and NICs to 100MB Full duplex instead of auto-detect, but still get the same results.
 
I also have a 10/100 quad-port card installed in a NetApp filer. All four ports are trunked together and connect to 4 ports in the Catalyst. The ports in the Catalyst are trunked using the Port Channel feature of the CatOS.  When I look at the port statistics on 3 of the 4 ports from the quad-card, there are a ton of runts and errors (both transmit and receive). The 4th port is fine, no errors.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco :: Switches That Can Perform Task Depending On Layer?

Jul 23, 2012

I'm new and just entered in the world of studying my certification for Cisco, since I'm curious I see that there are switches that can perform task depending on the layer? I see some with specifics for Layer 2, some other for layer 3 and even some others with router capabilities!I know this is a rookie question but how do I know what the best switch for a network? or how can I identify them?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: SF300-24 Layer 3 Mode Routing?

Dec 14, 2012

i've a problem with my SF300-24 routing. That's my network configuration:
 
Port 1 to 12 assigned to VLAN 10
Port 13 to 23 assigned to VLAN 20
Port 24 has an ip 10.17.7.254 to connect with my deafult route, beacuse I've also a Linksys RV042 router, connected in turn with my ISP router, having an ip 10.17.7.1.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: C6509E Multicast Configuration For Only Layer 3 Switches

Jun 13, 2011

If there is C6509E as core switches and C3750 Switches running layer 3 at the User dept uplink to the C6509E Switches, what will be the multicast command that should be implemented at both end? CGMP or IGMP or do not need to implement this snooping as well?
 
Users (IPTV) -> C3750 (Access Switch) -> C6509E (Core Switch) -> C6509E (Server Farm Switch) -> IPTV Servers
 
Do we need to configure multicast at C3750 Switches (Access Level) at the User dept? Let's say the IPTV Mulitcast is 239.1.1.1. How can we build up this multicast configuration based on this scenario?

View 5 Replies View Related

Linksys Wireless Router :: EA4500 Performance Is Very Poor

Aug 24, 2012

I recently purchased an EA4500.  It started out working really well, but recently I noticed that my speed on my iPhone and iPad has dropped significantly.  When I'm in my office where the router is set up, I'm getting around 15 to 20 mb download speed and 5+ upload speed.  When I go to my living room about 40 feet away my speed drops to 1mb down and less than 1 up.  I expect to see a drop in my performance the further away I get from the router, but this seems really unacceptable to me.

View 1 Replies View Related

Linksys Wireless Router :: E900 Performance Is Very Poor

Oct 9, 2012

The wireless connection barely registers in the Speed Test within Cisco Connect - .56 download, 5.35 upload. A cable connection gives 2.4 download and 5.5 upload. The E900 is not far from the computer with no obstacles between.Is the wireless portion of the E900 set up improperly? Is there anything I can do to improve the wireless performance?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 WAN Port Gives Poor Performance Most Of Time

Jan 1, 2013

I have 2 RV042 routers with identical firmware (1.3.13.02-tm) and settings. One router is a backup that sits in a box, but both experience this problem. The WAN port gives very poor performance most of the time. Download speeds range from normal, 25mb, to less than .5mb. Pings from my command prompt or the routers "Diagnostic" page, even to the cable modem, are almost always above 500ms. However, pings to internal resources are fast, usually under 5ms. If I connect my laptop directly to the cable modem I have no speed issues. The problem occurs whether I use WAN1 or WAN2.
 
If I restart the router, speeds are fine for a few seconds and then it begins to slow down like someone is turning down a dial. We also regularly experience a complete internet disconnect quite often, and when it happens, the ping results are the same when it comes back up, almost like the router is restarting itself. [code]

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Wireless :: AP541N Poor Performance Of Network Connection

Dec 5, 2011

We have two Cisco AP541N running our wireless network in the office. They're configured with the same SSID, so that people are automatically switched between the two access points depending on their location in the office.
 
Frequently we are experiencing very poor performance of our wireless connections and it seems to be related to when 4-5 clients are connected to one access point. After restarting it (which also moves the 5 clients to the other access point), the performance problem goes away for a while.
 
I've upgraded one to firmware version AP541N-K9-2.0(1) (the other is running AP541N-K9-1.8(0)), but it doesn't seem to work.

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved