Cisco Firewall :: 5510 - After Disable Of Allow Rule Connection Is Still Active
Oct 25, 2011
I am managing a firewall setup with some ASA 5510's.One of the rules I have in the ACL list is to allow or deny (By disabling the rule) access to certain subnets.
I have a 3rd party vendor that from time to time need access to specific servers in the infrastructure, but I want to keep a certain level of control when they can access them and especially when they can not.
I know it works fine, I have done several tests to verify when they can connect and when they can not. But, now comes the tricky part, if they are already connected (Remote desktop) to the system, and I disable the rule, they are STILL!!! connected. It seems the firewall does not terminate the active session / cconnection when I disable the rule allowing them access..
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Dec 17, 2012
I have two ASA 5510s running in Active/Active mode. I need to make config changes on them. How do I go about it? Do I power off the secondary ASA and make the config changes on the primary and then power on the secondary ASA ? Or this another way to do this?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 10, 2011
ASA 5510 running without issues for a while but we needed extra port so added a 4GE SSM.
Having installed the 4GE SSM we had some issues with the card not liking a connection to our switches and only working by plugging directly from the server into the firewall, not great as we wanted extra servers on the line in the future. So we upgraded the firmware and no are at an impasse.
We have upgraded to 8.0(4)3 and now we cannot get any traffic through the port, we can't even connect to an external DNS server. Running a packet trace I get an immediate error on the first step '(l2_acl) FP L2 rule drop', and it appears as though the outside connection is down.
I have some experience on setting up basic port forwarding and NAT for internet access, webservers, mail but this has thrown me.
View 28 Replies
View Related
May 22, 2012
i have a cisco asa 5510 and would like to add a NAT rule for a range of ports like 50000-59999
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 24, 2011
I got a Global Implicit Rule problem with my Cisco ASA 5510. Here's my configuration : url...I created a PAT translation so that my web server (group LAN Network) could be accessed from the Internet.Although every rule seems to be ok, i got a "tcp deny access" when i try to telnet my public IP on port 80 (ping is ok).
Why is there only one Global Implicit Rule, and not one for each Interface (like in the older versions of ASA OS) ?
View 12 Replies
View Related
Mar 5, 2013
I am trying to add 89,462+ access list rules to an ASA 5510 running 8.2(5). I have added all the rules to an object group and when I try to apply the access list to an interface it gives me the following error:
ERROR: Cannot add policy to rule engine ERROR: Unable to assign access-list wan-out to interface wan
I have not tried not using an object group and just putting the rules in the access list. I want to be able to add to these rules if needed easily.
I think it's clear that i have exceeded the rule limit for the ASA. So my question is, what is the rule limit for an ASA 5510 and which ASA could I purchase that would handle this amount of rules?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 18, 2011
what is the purpose of the "Permint all traffic to less secure networks".
Well I know the purpose and the technique to handle some sercurity level is nice. when I cannot add add a rule without deleting this implicit rule?
The technique of security level is then obsolete?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Nov 30, 2011
If the 5510's support active/active ha. There is conflicting info. on the datasheet stating otherwise.
[URL]. As business needs grow, customers can install a Security Plus license, upgrading two of the Cisco ASA 5510 Adaptive Security Appliance interfaces to Gigabit Ethernet and enabling integration into switched network environments through VLAN support. This upgrade license maximizes business continuity by enabling Active/Active and Active/Standby high-availability services.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 18, 2012
i read that you need only one L-ASA5510-SEC-PL for setting up a Active/Standby Failover. I installed the license on the 1st ASA and tried to setup the failover via the ASDM wizard. It always fails, because the 2nd device can't have a 'base' license.So does this mean, i really need another license?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 12, 2012
i have a problem with a Failover Pair of 5510. The Boxes run with the software version 8.2.5.
If the Active ASA goes down, the Standby ASA switch to Active.
If i switch on the old Active ASA, both ASA are Active. This problem don't solved with the command 'no failover active' on the Standby box. This problem only solved with the command 'no failover' and then 'failover' on the Standby box.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 14, 2012
I am adding a failover asa to an a firewall that is already in production. They are both 5510's, they both have the same abount of ram, have the same code versions. Will there be any downtime while adding the secondary in?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 4, 2012
I currently have a LAN-based failover setup between two 5510s. The failover link is a crossover cable. In the current setup, if I unplug the crossover cable both units become active. From what I understood from Cisco documentation, each unit should mark the failover interface as down and there shouldn't be any failover. That's exactly how I want this setup to work.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 12, 2012
I want to disable the telnet option/feature on ASA 5510
i tried no telnet alone it wont work as i didnt configured any telnet at all.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 1, 2012
What I am attempting to do is setup snmpv3 on two failover 5510's .The problem I am running into, the snmp management software rejects one of the devices as it sees it as having a duplicate engine ID since the two devices share the same config. Would like to know how this would work in an active/active setup being able to poll both devices.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 23, 2012
understanding clear about new Cisco ASA 5515-x, 5525-x.I know that this device supports IPS which is included to this appliance without any additional modules.But can this box support IPS and content-filering (Cisco ASA CX or so..) in the same time.
The problem also in next. Can two ASA 5510 with diffrent modules (in one AIP-SSM and in other CSC-SSM) be in active/active failover design?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 2, 2013
I have a dual ISP, 1 primary and 1 secondary terminated on fa0 and fa2 on our ASA respectively. ASA was configured so that, when the primary fails, the secondary kicks in. [code]
It was until yesterday that we experienced downtime on the primary ISP that the secondary doesn't do the fail-over. I have to manually configure the device to use the secondary ISP. Currently, I'm looking at maybe this has something to do with the licensing.We are currently using a Base License, should we be upgrading to Security Plus?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Oct 14, 2011
I have a 5510 ASA and have been given another an told to make them active and standby. Basically the active one is working great but the second one has no config on it apart from the default one, but is the same firmware level. I guess I need a crossover cable, and what happens with the inside and outside interfaces, would they need to go into a vlan on a switch, one inside vlan where the 2 firewalls inside interface go into and another vlan for the outside? Otherwise if it failsover to the standby ASA the inside and outside interfaces wouldn't work.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 25, 2012
I just added a new 5510 failover unit to an existing 5510 and when connecting my new outside interface on an Active/Standby firewall pair, i get errors messages (red x) on each port scan (monitor & syslog) although the error message indicate all ports are good...additionally the firewalls flip between active and standby non stop. I remove the new standby unit outside interface from a shared switch and everything clears up.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 8, 2012
I know that I've run into this before but I can't remember the fix. I have a 5510. The 3 interfaces involved are INSIDE, OUTSIDE, and GUEST. Corporate users are allowed to put their iPhones on the Guest network, but the problem is that their Exchange ActiveSync stops working. It is tied to the external DNS name of the OWA server (we'll say webmail.abc.com). So the users are funneled out one public IP on the OUTSIDE interface and are trying to communicate with the outside of the OWA server, which is NATed to another public IP on the same outside interface. What do I need to do on the ASA to allow users on the guest network (behind the GUEST interface) to access the mail server using its public IP (behind the INSIDE interface)
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 8, 2012
We have 2 ASA 5510's setup in an active, standby failover configuration. When the primary fails over to standby, the 3rd party cert does not failover to the standby ASA. The users then receive the CERT missing, invalid message and have to select yes, no to move on. This does not occur when the primary is not in failover mode. It is my understanding that failover fails over certs but in our case it does not apper to be working correctly.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 17, 2012
I have a pair of ASA 5520s operating in failover pair as active/standby, having two contexts on them. I am planning to share the load and make it active/active making first context active on the primary unit and second context active on the secondary unit. My question is if this will disrupt any connectivity thru these firewalls when I do "no failover" on the active/standby and assign the contexts to different failover groups and enable the failover back.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Oct 12, 2011
how to totaly disable Admin/ASDM access on our public interface of our 5510. I don't want to change IPSec or SSL access to the outside interface. Just totaly disable access to Admin/ASDM from the outside without halting all other access.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 10, 2012
I am working on a network which has two ISP connections (Active/Active) terminating on router (ASR1000). From the LAN side (6500 switch) all the traffic need to be route on ISP1 but some of the specific subnets like 10.250.0.0/16 need to be route on ISP2 connection.
I am planning to use PBR and NAT with route maps. any documents or refrences are provided.
(access switches)---------(core switch)----------(routers)----------------(ISP1)
----------------------(ISP2)
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 10, 2011
I faced one problem in our core switch 4507 R . Active sup lost connection and standby came active. We got lot of errors/alerts on console shown below. [Code] Also when I reloaded the switch with reload command only both sups got reloaded but I want to reload all the modules but reload command do not gives any options for that.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 20, 2012
I am looking at deploying a pair of 5585X's in an active/active multiple context state. I am creating Mulitple contexts that need to be able to route to each other. I was going to deploy a type of Gateway context that has a shared interface to all of the other contexts, instead of sharing interfaces directly between the contexts, i beleive this will work as basically i am just cascadng the contexts and sharing interfaces.
The main problem i have come across, is that if i deploy active/active across two appliances using 2 failover groups i can not see a way to route between them, for example.
I have Context 1, Context 2 and Context GW A including the shared interfaces of Con1 and Con2 in failover group 1 on appliance A with the respective standbys on Appliance 2. I have Context 2, Context 4 and Context GW B including the shared interfaces of Con 3 and Con 4 in failover group 2 on appliance B with the respective standbys on Appliance 1.
I need to be able to route traffic between Context GW A and GW B so that the contexts can communicate in normal operation and in failover. I do not beleive that I can share an interface between contexts in two separate failover groups and to be honest without adding a L3 device between the appliances i am not sure if this is possible.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jun 1, 2011
I have an ASA5520 in location A with an ISP connection and a matching ASA5520 in location B with a separate ISP connection. We have fiber connecting the two locations and vlans passing back and forth so I will be able to configure the failover via a vlan as well as extend the ISP's to each location via vlans. The Active/Active configuration with the multiple security contexts does not seem to be an issue but how is a redundant ISP configured in this mode?We want to have context A using the ASA in location A with ISP1 as the primary and failing over to ISP 2 in locaiton B We also want to have context B using the ASA in location B with ISP 2 as the primary and failing over to ISP1 in location A Would route tracking provide the desired result? Is there a better option?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 30, 2011
I have 2 asa 5520 firewalls including and 1 AIP-SSM-10 module in each of them. the configuration is set using active/active failover and context mode.
Both of them run individualy the IPS module. The IPS is configured using inline mode and fail-open option. However when one of the module fails and the state is changing from up to init or anything else making the IPS to fail then failover is detected and ASA consider it as failover and bounce context to the other unit.
IPS soft is 6.0(4) and ASA soft is 8.0(3)
I have checked cisco doc and it is confusing to me. it says: "The AIP-SSM does not participate in stateful failover if stateful failover is configured on the ASA failover pair." but it really does participate. Running is not really an option because of production network impact matter..
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 27, 2011
its possible to set up active/active failover using etherchannel on 5585s?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 14, 2011
I have one ASA 5510, a primary ISP (cable, the single public IP lives on the ASA), and a backup ISP (ADSL, separate router that hosts its single public IP). I use IP tracking to detect link down on the primary. When I pull the plug on the cable modem and go to "Route monitoring", I can see the ASA's default route is now the backup ISP default route.That conforms with [URL] Pings to 8.8.8.8 fail however, and when I do a packet trace the ASA complains about the dynamic nat rule that still points to the primary ISP's interface.Only when I change the existing dynamic NAT rule (on my inside interface) to use the backup ISP's pool (which is a single 192.168.x.y address) , does 8.8.8.8 reply to my pings. So it kinda works but it's not full auto . I can't add a second dynamic nat rule on the same inside interface, nor can I select 2 IP pools in a single dynamic nat rule.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 17, 2013
How to Configure ASA5520 for Active/Active
View 8 Replies
View Related
Nov 29, 2012
I've configured an ASA 5510 FW with asa901-k8 ios. on it's "inside" port there is 10.90.0.0 network. there is another network (10.190.0.0) in my system that can be reached via another router which has 10.90.0.253 ip address. when a client in the 10.90 network wants to reach the 10.190 network the fw redirects the request to the router (10.90.0.253) because the fw is my gateway. there is no problem so far... but... while i can ping and traceroute a 10.190... user from 10.90... network, i can't use any non-icmp appliactions. for example i can't use rdp programs, http web interfaces of some devices on remote network (10.190.0.0). what can cause that? is there any rule in asa that blocks these protocols?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 8, 2012
I am a novice with networks but do have a fair understanding of networks. I have a small business network, utilizing a RVS4000 router (Firmware V2.0.27)I am attempting to set up firewall rules to block certain web sites at certain times.I have successfully set up rules using source and destination ranges, to deny service 24 hours a day everyday.
However and here is the problem when I attempt to edit any of the rules (I want to change the time to certain hours of the day) it allows me to edit the rule but when I attempt to save I get an error message up saying there are invalid characters and it will not save the changes?create the whole thing with the changes I want it works fine, is this a known bug?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 1, 2013
I'm trying to troubleshoot an ASA5505.
The original goal was to block "Mumble/Murmur" (a voip app) traffic, which runs on TCP/UDP 64738, both inbound and outbound, except to a certain host (63.223.117.170).
However, when nothing I tried seemed to make a difference, just to troubleshoot, I decided to try blocking all inbound traffic. I first disconnected ethernet port 0/0 to ensure that it was cabled correctly and the outside interface went down when I did. That worked as expected, so I confirmed I had the right interface and it was cabled correctly.
I then applied a "any any deny ip" rule as the first element in the outside interface access_list, as you can see below. However, it appears to have had no real effect and the hit count is very low (it should be astronomical).
show ver
Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software Version 9.0(2)
Device Manager Version 7.1(2)
Compiled on Thu 21-Feb-13 13:10 by builders
System image file is "disk0:/asa902-k8.bin"
[Code].....
View 4 Replies
View Related
