Cisco Firewall :: 6509 - FWSM With Packets Dropped

Jun 9, 2013

I happen to noticed the FWSM was dropping packets at about 387 packets every 5 minutes. My outside FWSM is WAN facing and has a 1gig link (35% utilized) my inside facing has about 100 downstream switches to the closets. I do not see my 6509's back plane is being over utilized and my understanding of the FWSM show be go for 5 gig so it isn't oversubscribe. Why i am seeing packets dropped?

[Code] ......

View 2 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 / Dropped Packets In VPN AnyConnect Connections?

Dec 5, 2012

Our Cisco ASA 5510 running 8.4(4)1 just started dropping packets and our AnyConnect clients are seeing horrible performance.  The system is extremely slow compared to just a couple days ago.Nothing has changed on the system.  I can post the configs if needed.
 
firewall# sho int
Interface Ethernet0/0 "outside", is up, line protocol is up
  Hardware is i82546GB rev03, BW 1000 Mbps, DLY 10 usec
    Full-Duplex(Full-duplex), 1000 Mbps(1000 Mbps)
    Input flow control is unsupported, output flow control is off
    Description: == WAN Interface ==

[code]....
 
I have done a "sho vpn-sessiondb detail svc" and I can see the dropped packets of the individual users, but cannot see why the packets are still dropping.how I can correct this and restore speeds?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: FWSM V 4.1.3 Forwarding Packets To Sender MAC Address

Feb 26, 2011

Does the FWSM v 4.1.3 is capable to forward return packets to the MAC address that sent them to it first?

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: FWSM (in 6509) Is Not Coming Up?

Oct 29, 2012

our FWSM (in 6509) is not coming up, when tried to sesssion up using "Session slot 1 proc 1" command,It is giving error , "Tyring 127.0.0.11 .....connection timed out remote host not responding".
 
In "show mod" command output at Switch in IOS console:  under Card Type Section:  it is showing Model & Serial Number correctly,  Under MAC address sectino: displaying some MAC address But in Online Diag Status, it showing "Unknown" for Module 1.
 
We tried re-seating in other slots, but of no use. Giving same error. Some of other forms are saying it is the issue with 128 Mb CF image problem, FWSM is no more reachable from 6509 IOS console. We even tried using FWSM console (using PC-Conse & LCP Console) but FWSM is not contactable. 

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 6509 - FWSM Log Messages

Jul 16, 2011

I think I got a strange behavior on a context of my WS-SVC-FWM-1 (on a Catalyst 6509 running IOS 12.2(18)SXF17a) that is running FWSM Firewall Version 4.1(3). This context sends these log messages every ten minutes:
 
Jul 17 2011 23:31:16: %FWSM-6-302010: 0 in use, 0 most used
Jul 17 2011 23:31:17: %FWSM-6-302010: 2245 in use, 107133 most used
[code]...
 
If I issue the "show conn" three seconds later the log message, the output I got is: FWSM#   sh conn 1041 in use, 107133 most used
 
In another context on the same FWSM the log message sent every ten minutes is just this one:
 
Jul 17 2011 23:31:17: %FWSM-6-302010: 1358 in use, 72503 most used
Jul 17 2011 23:41:22: %FWSM-6-302010: 1590 in use, 72503 most used
 
In this case there is no the log message where the "in use" field and "most used" field are 0 (zero). why does the context send the message with the "in use" field and "most used" field 0 (zero).

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 6509 / 2811 - NAT At FWSM

May 17, 2011

I have attached a drawing of our network.  We have two 6509's connected to two Cisco 2811 (onsite) that the ISP owns. I am trying to get one side up and running before I worry about redundancy and so forth.  For this reason I have set all the HSRP priorities to 110 on the left 6509.  I have HSRP running between the ISP routers and V LAN 101 of the 6509's.  This works as I can ping yahoo and Google just fine from the 6509 switch.  I can't get from my laptop connected to V LAN 23 to the internet. 

It doesn't even attempt to NAT as there are no translations.  I have public address assigned by my ISP configured between the ISP routers and my 6509 on V LAN 101.  I then have the public address assigned to V LAN 100.  I configured V LAN 100 on the switch and V LAN 100 on the FWSM with the IP address in the drawing.  I have my NAT statements and route in my FWSM according to the drawing as well.  On the switch, I have a default route to X.X.12.19 which is the VIP between the ISP routers.  I can reach anything on the inside of my network, including the old network addresses from V LAN 23.  
 
1. Is it best to do NAT at the FWSM or should I do it on the MSFC connected to the ISP routers?  
2. If I have to configure NAT at the FWSM, does this requires me to extend the public network down to the FWSM? 
3. I'll take any examples you may have as I am stuck.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 6509 / High Connections On FWSM?

Oct 19, 2011

I am having issues trying to track down what is causing a high number of connection on our FWSM in our core 6509 switch. I recently upgraded my FWSM to 3.1(20) and I'm looking for a tool to be able to find the culprit. When I receive these messages I try to get onto the firewall in time to be able to get information regarding this issue but by the time I do the device recovers. Is there a way to tweat the threshold of the SNMP trap for high connections? Is there any way I can retreive this information via SNMP? Is there are command that will allow me to extract the local IP making the most connections?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 6509 FWSM Configuration With Shared Interface

Jul 2, 2011

I have attached a pdf of an example of a FWSM configuration with shared interfaces. Now what I dont get is (please refer to the link) url...Is there any difference between the natting that they have done on page B-4 on Context A.as opposed to configuring a static NAT for processing traffic to correct context nat(inside,outside) 209.165.201.0 10.1.2.0.The other question is on page B-2 (diagram) Context A has a customer A network linked to the inside interface. Is it possible to put a default route towards that "Network 2" cloud and restrict traffic from the 6509 switch towards the context A?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 6509-E / Traffic Coming From GRE Interface And Going Further Through FWSM?

Oct 4, 2011

I have problem with traffic coming from GRE interface and going further through FWSM on the same 6509-E chassis.It's very interesting and confusing. If packets are fragmented, I can go through, however, if I use normal packets (usual ping for example) traffic goes from outside to inside and stops on it's way back.
 
Here is the detailed info:
WS-C6509-E with WS-SUP720-3B
FWSM HW 4.0,  SW 4.1(4) 
 
GRE is done in hardware (source is loopback interface - only one loopback per GRE tunnel).

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 6509 / Configure VPN In FWSM (4.0.4) Multiple Context?

Jan 8, 2012

i have 6509+FWSM(4.0.4)  now i wanna use stite to stite  and ez vpn in the fwsm (multiple context) multiple context mode in fwsm support ipsec vpn?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: FWSM For 6506 / 6509 Is Supported In VSS Environment?

May 29, 2012

Does the FWSM for a 6506/6509 is supported in a VSS environment?Also, does the FWSM work with the 2T supervisor module? 

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 6509 - Management Access To FWSM Using CA Ssl Certificate

Mar 6, 2011

I need to enable Management access to FWSM using CA ssl certificate.
 
FWSM Version 3.2(5) in Cisco 6509 switch.
 
Got to know how to generate, import and export certificate but my query is how to get it applied to the management ip do i need to apply in the management interface.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 6509 - FWSM To ASASM Object Conversion

Nov 4, 2012

We are in the process of migrating to the ASA service modules on both our 6509E switches from our current FWSM. We have used the Cisco conversion tool and applied that to the service module. When viewing the context in ASDM we are unable to view the object names in the right hand pane.
 
On the FWSM I would see the following under Network Objects:
 
Network Objects
- JQ-Test
- JQ-Test2
- JQ-Test3
 
Network Object Group
+ JQ Group
      - JQ-Test
      - JQ-Test2
      - JQ-Test3
 
Now I have run the conversion tool and applied that to the ASA's I now get the following results.
 
Network Objects
- 10.1.1.1
- 10.2.2.2
- 10.3.3.3
 
Network Object Group
+ JQ Group
     - 10.1.1.1
     - 10.2.2.2
     - 10.3.3.3
 
I am aware that the naming convention on the ASA's are different to the FWSM as you can no longer use the "name 1.1.1.1 JQ-Test1" format but I was hoping that the conversion tool would do this for me.
 
Is there any way I can get the names of the object back without having to script something that takes the old FWSM format and convert it into an ASA format?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 6509 - Standby FWSM Stuck In Sync After Reload

May 8, 2011

We have a setup of FWSMs configured in single mode in 6509 chassis. Both 6509 are configured in VSS. Recently I have upgraded the firmwre from 4.0(3) to 4.1(3).....before upgradation config sync was not having any problem.
 
After upgradation...If any one of the FWSM reload..while coming up it gets stuck in config sync and no command we can run on any of the unit and get the error as..
Configuration update in progress by another process. Also on stannby fwsm no running-config displays.
 
If we used # failover suspend-config on primary and then reloads the standby fwsm...standby boots up with startup config and when  # no failover suspend-config command runs on active fwsm..the sync started and completing succssfully within 15 sec..
 
Also failover works well..with #no failover active..

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 6509 -Creating FWSM Intra-Chassis Redundancy

Oct 27, 2011

Currently we have two inter-chassis FWSM redundancy. I would like to configure them for intra-chassis.
 
Both FWSM's are in slot 7 of 6509 switches and i want to take secondary out from one of the 6509 switch and insert in the slot 3 of primary switch.
 
I addedd the following commands in my primary switch.
 
There were commands already present for FWSM in primary switch
 
firewall multiple-vlan-interfaces
firewall module 7 vlan-group 1
firewall vlan-group 1  2,3,777
 
to create intra-chassis redundancy i addedd the following command also there.
 
firewall module 3 vlan-group 1
 
after adding that, my firewalls worked fine but there was a issue with site loading. People from outside were able to access inside but from inside, we were not able to go outside.
 
do we need to clear arp from both FWSM's ? is there any other precautionary step, which we need to follow while working on it.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 6509 - Replacing Faulty FWSM Module In Cluster

Apr 15, 2013

We have a faulty FWSM module in Cisco 6509 switch in Active/Standby cluster mode
 
We have purchased a refurbished FWSM module to replace it. It has the same FWSM OS 4.0 (4) and is in factory default configuration
 
What procedures should I follow to make this unit live and sync the config between the current active unit to this one.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 6509 / Interface VLAN Stop Responding On FWSM Automatically

Aug 8, 2012

i  have been facing strange issue on FWSM (6509 switch). we have created a  vlan inteface for  server farm on fwsm and its stop responding  automatically and we need to give shut/ no shut command under that  interface to back into normal .

View 11 Replies View Related

Cisco Wireless :: AP WAP4410N Packets Are Being Dropped

Aug 20, 2012

I am using WAP4410N access point to connect 5 computer to the network.  Recently the wireless network is very bad; pakets are often being droped, very high reply times. I have upgraded to the latest firmware tried to change configuration with no use i even tried the default configuration.  I assumed that there's interference. I tried another AP ( linksys one) and things seems to be okay. what would be the problem with AP?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 8.21 / Packets Dropped At Encryption Stage?

Apr 27, 2013

I am truly struggling with the changes after 8.21. I am trying to get a VPN up between two sites. This is the B end, I am sure there are a bunch of problems in the other end too. Eg. the tunnel NAT does not have the right priority 1.when I establish the tunnel I get this:

3    Sep 01 2008    11:23:37  Tunnel Manager has failed to establish an L2L SA.  All configured IKE versions failed to establish the tunnel. Map Tag= outside_map.  Map Sequence Number = 1. 
# packet-tracer input inside tcp 10.2.32.11 80 10.1.1.10 80
 Phase: 1
Type: ACCESS-LIST
Subtype:

[code]....

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 6509 / FWSM VLAN Configuration Mismatch And Some VLAN Deleted

Aug 12, 2012

We  have 6509 VSS with FWSM Module and we have created two context on it, one is INTERNALL CONTEXT othe is EXTERNALL Context? We have spanned various VLANS in switches and FWSM context level.  All VLAN Gateways are configured in context level.
 
Activity description : We had planned migration of these devices into a new Datacenter, it was a planned activity. During  migration of devices from one Dc to a new DC  we broke the VSS and kept the primary running and removed the secondary switch and migrated this secondary to new DC  and powered this device ON in the new DC and checked all the config was very much fine but this device was OFF network as secondary was brought to new DC just to limit the downtime during the primary switch movement.
 
During the activity ( Primary switch movement )We powered off the Primary switch  and mean time before shifting into new Data center  We had brought up secondary switch which was already existing in the DC was put live in the network and it was working fine without any issues.
 
Later  we had moved  Primary into new data center and tried to put into VSS with the secondary , during this period the secondary device into went into RECOVERY MODE  and  primary device was not responding and devices  went off network and immediatly we  removed the VSL link and brought up  primary into production network without secondary online in the network ( Without VSS just stand alone switch ) network started working, but bringing up the primary we found that some of the VLANS in the FWSM was deleted and some VLAN had misconfiguration ( example : say original  VLAN  ip 10.200.112.1 has become  10.300.13.1 ) also some of the access list as well as SVI was deleted making configuration mismatch.
 
Wanted to know while syncronization b/n primary and secondary switch in VSS if we pull out VSL link would create this type of issues.

View 1 Replies View Related

D-Link DIR-615 :: Wireless Stats Showing TX Packets Dropped

Jan 27, 2012

I notice that I have TX Packets Dropped only under the wireless section.This occurs when the wireless network is not in use also.I have tried many different channels, almost all of them.Im using wpa2-tkip+aes, mixed g and n network, auto 20/40, wps disabled.I understand about wireless interference also.wireless devices dont seem to have any issues though, not dropping from network.I usually get 4000 wireless TX drops a day. LAN and WAN show No TX drops

View 11 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: C3825 ISR IP Inspect Dropped Packets?

Oct 31, 2011

i am wanting to log dropped and oop packets on a c3825 isr with ios12.3(11)T3.  on other routers(like a 2951 running 151-4.M2)i can state ip inspect log drop-pkt and it will log to buffer or syslog all dropped and oop packets.  can i do this on this 3825 another way

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: NetFlow / 6500 / Export Packets Were Dropped Due To No Fib?

Mar 13, 2012

I have a problem with the 6500 not exporting netflow data. They are not exported due to no fib.I have read somewhere that this has something to do with VRF. VRF are running on the router.ip flow ingress has been applied to desired ip int.Is there anything I could do to make it export netflow data?
 
VSS-core-XXX-rs1#sh ip flow export
Flow export v5 is enabled for main cache
  Export source and destination details :
  VRF ID : Default
    Source(1)       xxx.xxx.83.253 (Unknown)

[code]....

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Infrastructure :: High CPU Usage / Dropped Packets - Switch Blade WS-CBS3120X-S

Jun 25, 2012

I have a couple of Switches Blade 3120, working as active-standby model (HSRP) on a new site deployment. There are other 20 sites more or less, working on the same model, without issues. But in this one, we are seeing a high cpu usage. The traffic going through the platform is 600Mbps (on peaks), and in this case we have 40% of CPU usage. Traffic should be close to 3 Gbps. When we tried to send the whole traffic through the platform, active switch began to drop packets on the majority of interfaces.
 
When we analyze the CPU usage, there is a special process called "HL3U bkgrd proce" always have the most CPU use, but we do not know what concerns. We do not know if it is caused because there are PBRs configured. It should not matter. How I mentioned, there are other sites working fine and have had always the same PBR number.
 
What is causing the high usage?. Is there a special debug we could to perform to diagnose the issue?. Also, we have seen a high interrupt CPU usage (9% in this case).  
 
bog-sib-INT-rtr-1#show processes cpu sorted 5sec
CPU utilization for five seconds: 30%/9%; one minute: 25%; five minutes: 23%
PID Runtime(ms)     Invoked      uSecs   5Sec   1Min   5Min TTY Process

[Code].....

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: N7000 Details Of Packets Dropped By COPP Policy

Mar 13, 2012

On one of our N7K, we have some packets dropped by the COPP policy in the class-default class-map. Partial results of "show policy-map interface control-plane" not so long after clearing the counters : [code]
 
what traffic is dropped by the policy ? Is there any logging possible ?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Slow Performance With FWSM In Different DMZ 6509

Aug 8, 2012

i am feeling an issue related to 2 x 6509 with fwsm.
 
Mod Ports Card Type                              Model              --- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ -----------  1    6  Firewall Module                                                 WS-SVC-FWM-1        2   48  CEF720 48 port 1000mb SFP                            WS-X6748-SFP        3   48  CEF720 48 port 10/100/1000mb Ethernet            WS-X6748-GE-TX      4   48  CEF720 48 port 10/100/1000mb Ethernet            WS-X6748-GE-TX     5    5  Supervisor Engine 720 10GE (Active)                   VS-S720-10G     
 
Hw    Fw           Sw           Status ------------ ------------ ------- 4.3   7.2(1)       4.1(2)       Ok 1.12  12.2(14r)S5  12.2(33)SXH3 Ok 3.0   12.2(18r)S1  12.2(33)SXH3 Ok 3.0   12.2(18r)S1  12.2(33)SXH3 Ok 2.1   8.5(2)       12.2(33)SXH3 Ok
 
on fwsm we have different dmz for different application. mostly of Oracle (1521 port) to application means seperate one. problem is oracle people reported the slow performace when exporting dump from once vlan to another. before that they are using 3com technology (network) and on this its ok. time difference is double from old to new.
 
i had sniffed the traffic also and found alot of TCP OUT OF ORDERS errors. i read that this is the bug which is resolved in 4.0.

View 10 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - Unable To Ping IP In FWSM

Nov 17, 2012

I have a vlan defined in FWSM for server farm there is a one server with two IP addresses and teaming has done on it how ever from FWSM i am able to ping both IP addresses but from core 6509 switch i am only able to ping one ip address. from FWSM show ARP command displays the same virtual mac addresses against both IPS of the same server.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Supervisor Upgrade With FWSM?

Oct 8, 2012

We are planning to upgrade the IOS on our two 6509E supervisors in the next few weeks. We currently run IOS 12.2(33) SXI1 and are upgrading to 12.2(33) SXJ3. At the moment the two supervisors are in SSO mode and after reading many articles it says that when the images are different on the two supervisors they are in RPR mode. When you then reload the active supervisor it will reboot all the line cards.
 
1. Is above correct? Will my line card reload?

2. We also have a FWSM installed, When/If the line cards are rebooted does the FWSM also reboot?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 FWSM VLANs Do Not Show Up

Feb 7, 2012

Configuring FWSM in a 6509.  When I set "firewall vlan-group 40  40-42,251", it results in: "No more than one svi is allowed. Command rejected.". 
 
I had "firewall multiple-vlan-interfaces" set for a previous use of this module, but took that off with the "no" command.  Suspect that is the issue, but do not see how to resolve.  Seems similar to bug CSCsr48563, but I am at the fixed code for that bug.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Packet Dropped Due To Input Queue Full On 6509

Nov 9, 2011

i have issues logging into one of our core switches.its a 6509 switch but i cannot log in remotely.when i try to console in on the console port, i cannot log in instead i get the above error message.I haven't rebooted yet but would it solve the problem as this switch is a production switch.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Application :: ACE RST Packets With 6509

Aug 15, 2012

I have ACE10 Module in my switch core 6509, my context "Proxy" was criated for balance connections to Forefront TMG Servers, this balance needs original client IP Address connections end to end in the solution.
 
My problem is: The clients are complaining of slowness connection to the internet, i captured the traffic in the ace capture feature and i see some RST packets and severals checksum error packets in pcap file.
 
The topology is:
 
Client -> ACE VIP VLAN 81 -> RSERVERS VLAN 80
 
Vlan 80 is in L2 mode(no interface vlan in the switch core 6509, route occurs through the ace appliance).
The IP address 10.96.200.6 is the gw for rservers.
[Code]...

View 1 Replies View Related

Severe % Dropped Packets On XP Machine When Windows 7 Machine On Network Not Switch

Aug 2, 2011

I have a strange error on my home network that I cannot find a solution to.I have an Huawei SmartAX MT882 from TalkTalk acting as a modem connected to a D-Link DSL-G624T acting as a router/switch. Connected to the D-Link I have a Windows 7 Pro machine (64-bit, SP1) and an XP (home i think) machine (sp 2 i think).The SmartAX modem is set up to perform DHCP and DNS relaying and the D-Link has DHCP turned off and DNS relay turned off.The Win7 machine can access the network, get an IP address and access the internet without problems, regardless as to the status of the XP machine.The XP machine can access the network, get an IP address and access the internet with no problems ONLY of the win7 is powered up. When the win7 machine is off, the XP machine seems to drop about 25% of the ping packets between it and the D-Link router and has no internet access (because of this i assume). [code]

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 6509 Fwsm Multiple Subnets Routed On One Port From 3750

Dec 20, 2010

We have a 6509 that was connected to 2 other locations(location A and B) and our local lan (location MAIN).  We wanted to move the location A and B to a 3750 switch and only allow the traffic that needed to access our location MAIN to come through the firewall.  The only problem I ran into is that before location A and B were on different interfaces so in the 6509 firewall the routes for traffic to our MAIN location was done by static routes.
 
I.E.
static (MAIN_intf,A_intf) 192.1.1.72 10.94.10.72 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
static (MAIN_intf,B_intf) 192.2.2.72 10.94.10.72 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

[Code]....

because it has a static overlap, which makes sense to me, but my question is how do I configure the network to get this to work?  Do I have to reconfigure my network and access-list?  Do I need to add more ports between the 6509 and 3750?  I'm not sure if this is the best way to do what we want. If something is not clear I'll try my best to explain the setup, but I just took over for our I.T. guy when he left.
 
I put 10.10.10.72 instead I should have put 10.94.10.72. the routed port is on a different subnet than the computer I'm trying to access.

View 4 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved