I have a vlan defined in FWSM for server farm there is a one server with two IP addresses and teaming has done on it how ever from FWSM i am able to ping both IP addresses but from core 6509 switch i am only able to ping one ip address. from FWSM show ARP command displays the same virtual mac addresses against both IPS of the same server.
View 2 RepliesWe are planning to upgrade the IOS on our two 6509E supervisors in the next few weeks. We currently run IOS 12.2(33) SXI1 and are upgrading to 12.2(33) SXJ3. At the moment the two supervisors are in SSO mode and after reading many articles it says that when the images are different on the two supervisors they are in RPR mode. When you then reload the active supervisor it will reboot all the line cards.
1. Is above correct? Will my line card reload?
2. We also have a FWSM installed, When/If the line cards are rebooted does the FWSM also reboot?
Configuring FWSM in a 6509. When I set "firewall vlan-group 40 40-42,251", it results in: "No more than one svi is allowed. Command rejected.".
I had "firewall multiple-vlan-interfaces" set for a previous use of this module, but took that off with the "no" command. Suspect that is the issue, but do not see how to resolve. Seems similar to bug CSCsr48563, but I am at the fixed code for that bug.
Any have experience on triggered failover on VSS deployment with 1 VS-720-10G-3C in each chassis? I tried using "redundancy force-switchover" but after that the 20G VSL is flapping up & down and cannot be up normally, we got 1 FWSM in each chassis, any configuration need to fit in this kind deployment? BTW, if I shutdown the power source of VSS active chassis, both FWSM & VSS can failover normally.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have 2 6509 chasis with one SUP720-3B in each and current IOS is s72033-ipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF4 and 2 FWSM with version is 3.3.1 I need to upgrade FWSM system software to 4.1, after checking FWSM 4.1 release notes, I thought of upgrading IOS to latest version to 12.2(33)SXJ.I got new 2 CF of 512MB and downloaded the new IOS on them and need to upgrade 6509 IOS first to meet the requirement for FWSM upgrade.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have 2 modules of FWSM in 6500 switch (failover). I need 5 context. When I use in routed mode (like in the picture) , I cannot ping the servers behind the firewall. (I have ping to FW context) In transparent mode, it is not happening.
View 1 Replies View RelatedFrom My Router that connects to Cable modem i am unable to ping website 4.2.2.2I am able to ping all other websites fines.Same website i can ping from my pc and all other switches fine.Router has only 1 ACL thats for NAT.
View 25 Replies View RelatedLast week we had some forwarding issues with our cat 6509e VSS pair, wherby clients could ping the gateway but couldnt route through it! we identified this as being core 2 in the vss pair, yesterday we rebooted the 2nd switch and now the issue has been resolved.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a 6509-E chassis that was prevoius in a VSS configuration. Due to some VSL failures I had to cobvert it to a standalone chassis but would like to bring it back to a virtual system.
Whenever I try to convert it by using the command "switch convert mode virtual" I get the msg %Please configure local switch number first". After doing so by entering the CLI cmd "switch set switch_num 1 local" I still get the same message.
On a Catalyst 6509 switch I have configured wccp protocol in order to redirect the Http traffic to a Bluecoat SG8100. It was working fine until a new L3 interface implementation.Thereafter I was unable to redirect the http traffic due to an error reported from the Cat6509: [code] After some checks I supposed that the problem should be the UDP 2048 port connection between the Switch and the Bluecoat while the switch L3 port and the bluecoat are on the same Lan. A deep analysis found that the WCCP protocol seems to be as follow:
-Proxy address 10.64.28.240 to Switch Port 10.64.28.250 Here I Am
-Switch Port 10.64.28.250 to Proxy address 10.64.28.240 I See You
-Switch Port 10.66.0.251 to Proxy address 10.64.28.240 UDP 2048 packet (dropped by firewall)
It's strange to me that the first dialog is correctly handled by the correct Cat6509 interface while the UDP packets are flowing from another Vlan interface not configured with the WCCP and apparently not involved on the protocol.Last of all the WCCP is now disabled and unusable?
I have 2 routers, one is an Apple AirPort Extreme with a static outside IP address, I also have a Cisco 871 with a static outside IP address. The Airport Extreme connects to a switch on the private network and has an IP address ending in .1. The Cisco 871 connects to the same Private network and it ends in .2. The 871 is setup as a VPN Server. now when clients connect to the VPN they can ping the VLan IP Address on the 871, but they can t ping any other hosts on the smae network. The hosts on the private network can ping the vlan on the 871.
View 7 Replies View RelatedPlatform:
cisco6509-E with FWSM
Supervisor Engine 32 PISA 8GE
sup-bootdisk:s32p3-adventerprisek9_wan-mz.122-18.ZY2.bin
command:
(config)#ip nat inside source static tcp 10.10.8.147 14029 interface g7/8 14029
(config)#no ip nat inside source static tcp 10.10.8.147 14029 interface g7/8 14029
#clear ip nat tran *
(config)#ip nat inside source static tcp 10.10.8.147 14029 interface g7/8 14029
%Port 14029 is being used by system
Or %Static entry in use, cannot change
But when I perform "sh ip nat tran" command,There is nothing
I just barely put in a Cisco 3925 on our network. I've configured gigabitethernet 0/2 to live on our management VLAN with an IP address of 10.129.0.31/16. I did a "no shut" on the interface. Everything should be ready to allow me to ping and/or SSH to that interface but I can't. It's really weird because I've done this a thousand times (at least on ASAs). I must be missing something. At any rate, the default gateway of the management VLAN is 10.129.0.1. I can ping that from the router. I can also ping that from my laptop (which lives on a completely different VLAN). But I can't ping the router from my laptop or vice versa.
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 1360 bytes
!
! Last configuration change at 19:05:13 UTC Thu Jan 10 2013
!
[Code].....
i am stuck in a issue! unable to ping the SVI
i am design a small network for a office.
1 router 2811
1 switch 3750-e
Router is connected to the mpls cloud with ospf.
here re the config.
Router#
int fa0/0
ip 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.252
[Code]....
i connect my laptop and give ip 22.0.68.1 255.255.255.0 and default gateway 22.0.68.251but can not ping SVI VLAN 201 (22.0.68.251) ?
and from the SWITCH i can not ping the 20.20.20.2?
I cannot ping and end node on my system from my Cisco 2911. I've tried to configure my computer to ping the device and I am able to. It seems the difference between using my computer and the 2911 is that with my computer I am able to set the default gateway as the end node's ip.
View 1 Replies View Relatedi have a device connected to 2960 switch. It is an access port and i could ping the device from other switches , also from outside the lan. But i am not able to ping the device from 2960 switch alone. I suspected and checked the arp table and it was showing as incomplete. I created the manual arp entry and tried pinging but no luck.
View 14 Replies View RelatedYesterday I configured the 7010 Nexus switch. I created a VDC and allocated few ports and configured VLAN for testing. After enabling feature interface-vlan i was allowed to configured L3 interface for the vlan. I assigned ip address and connected few server to check the reachability but it says Destination Host Unreachable.
NX OS Ver : n7000-s1-dk9.5.2.4.bin
Configuration of the VDC below.
feature telnet
feature udld
feature interface-vlan
feature lacp
[Code]....
I've got a 2621 configured as my main gateway to the internet - right now it's obtaining a DHCP ip from a the ISP's proprietary router set to bridged mode.
As of now, I'm unable to ping the internal interface of the router. I can ping external IP's only, even though I have DNS servers listed, i am unable to resolve host names. I'm running a few servers to which people are able to connect to my web server, among other services. I even have a crypto map setup to another 2621 across the country and can ping all internal ips on the other end... I JUST CANNOT PING THE INTERNAL INTERFACE of the router!!
I've noticed that when I ping the router during it's boot process (using linux un-interupted) I get a response in a very short window, then dies again. I'll post my config below:
[code]....
I have router connected to 2 3550 switches directly. 3550A and B switches are running HSRP. OSPF is running between Router and 2 switches.
From Switch B i can ping the Router Wan interface but not the internet sites. from Switch A i can ping any sites?
Switch B
3550SMIB# sh ip routeCodes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area N1
[Code]......
The network is set up like this.
Host -----> 3750 (classic) running IPSERVICES stack ----> 3550 router -----> VPN 3005 Concentrator.
IP routing is disabled on the 3750 (it's acting solely as a switch) IP routing is enabled with an EIGRP process running on the 3550 router that has the network for the 3005 broadcasting.
I can ping the vpn 3005 concentrator from a telnet session in the 3550 but not from the 3750.I can ping between the 3750 and the 3550 vlan management interfaces. Visually speaking it's like this
3750 ------> 3550 [Success!!!!]
3550 ------> VPN 3005 Concentrator [Success!!!!]
3750 ------> 3550 --xxxx--> VPN 3005 Concentrator [Timeout....]
I know this because I tracerout to the 3005 from the 3750 and it resolved the default gateway configured for the 3550 properly but then started timing out.
The 3750 is trunked to the 3550.
3750 is vtp client mode
3550 is vtp server mode
I'm wondering if there's a layer 2 issue involved here as it is a VTP domain and maybe it's not returning properly.
Here is my Lab Setup: 2691 is BGP nei to R4 router and they are not directly connected. 2691 and R4 are in same AS 6500. 2691 Config---router ospf 1 network 3.3.3.3 0.0.0.0 area 0 . Its advertising its loop back IP to OSPF domain.
router bgp 6500
no synchronization
bgp log-neighbor-changes
neighbor 6.6.6.6 remote-as 6500
neighbor 6.6.6.6 update-source Loopback3
[code]...
R4 Router
router ospf 11
log-adjacency-changes
network 6.6.6.6 0.0.0.0 area 0
[ code].....
We can see that 2691 and R4 are BGP neis and 2691 has 200.1.x.x routes in its route table. My question is why from 2691 router i am unable to ping any route learned by BGP from R4?
2691Router# ping 50.1.1.0 Type escape sequence to abort.Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 50.1.1.0, timeout is 2 seconds:.....Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)2691Router#ping 200.1.2.0 [ code]...
I am just setting up a simple scenario with a 1841. Server @ 172.31.1.1 cannot ping 172.31.0.254 or 172.31.0.105. It can ping 172.31.1.250. The router can, on the other hand, ping devices on both networks. This is just for testing routing theory so I don't know why hosts on either side of the network cannot ping each other.
I am only using the FastEthernet interfaces on Router 1841.
I currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:
x3 48 ports
x1 NAM
x2 Sup720
Running 12.2(18)SXF3
I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis?Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?
I currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:
x3 48 ports
x1 NAM
x2 Sup720
Running 12.2(18)SXF3.I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis. Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?
our FWSM (in 6509) is not coming up, when tried to sesssion up using "Session slot 1 proc 1" command,It is giving error , "Tyring 127.0.0.11 .....connection timed out remote host not responding".
In "show mod" command output at Switch in IOS console: under Card Type Section: it is showing Model & Serial Number correctly, Under MAC address sectino: displaying some MAC address But in Online Diag Status, it showing "Unknown" for Module 1.
We tried re-seating in other slots, but of no use. Giving same error. Some of other forms are saying it is the issue with 128 Mb CF image problem, FWSM is no more reachable from 6509 IOS console. We even tried using FWSM console (using PC-Conse & LCP Console) but FWSM is not contactable.
i am feeling an issue related to 2 x 6509 with fwsm.
Mod Ports Card Type Model --- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ ----------- 1 6 Firewall Module WS-SVC-FWM-1 2 48 CEF720 48 port 1000mb SFP WS-X6748-SFP 3 48 CEF720 48 port 10/100/1000mb Ethernet WS-X6748-GE-TX 4 48 CEF720 48 port 10/100/1000mb Ethernet WS-X6748-GE-TX 5 5 Supervisor Engine 720 10GE (Active) VS-S720-10G
Hw Fw Sw Status ------------ ------------ ------- 4.3 7.2(1) 4.1(2) Ok 1.12 12.2(14r)S5 12.2(33)SXH3 Ok 3.0 12.2(18r)S1 12.2(33)SXH3 Ok 3.0 12.2(18r)S1 12.2(33)SXH3 Ok 2.1 8.5(2) 12.2(33)SXH3 Ok
on fwsm we have different dmz for different application. mostly of Oracle (1521 port) to application means seperate one. problem is oracle people reported the slow performace when exporting dump from once vlan to another. before that they are using 3com technology (network) and on this its ok. time difference is double from old to new.
i had sniffed the traffic also and found alot of TCP OUT OF ORDERS errors. i read that this is the bug which is resolved in 4.0.
I think I got a strange behavior on a context of my WS-SVC-FWM-1 (on a Catalyst 6509 running IOS 12.2(18)SXF17a) that is running FWSM Firewall Version 4.1(3). This context sends these log messages every ten minutes:
Jul 17 2011 23:31:16: %FWSM-6-302010: 0 in use, 0 most used
Jul 17 2011 23:31:17: %FWSM-6-302010: 2245 in use, 107133 most used
[code]...
If I issue the "show conn" three seconds later the log message, the output I got is: FWSM# sh conn 1041 in use, 107133 most used
In another context on the same FWSM the log message sent every ten minutes is just this one:
Jul 17 2011 23:31:17: %FWSM-6-302010: 1358 in use, 72503 most used
Jul 17 2011 23:41:22: %FWSM-6-302010: 1590 in use, 72503 most used
In this case there is no the log message where the "in use" field and "most used" field are 0 (zero). why does the context send the message with the "in use" field and "most used" field 0 (zero).
I have attached a drawing of our network. We have two 6509's connected to two Cisco 2811 (onsite) that the ISP owns. I am trying to get one side up and running before I worry about redundancy and so forth. For this reason I have set all the HSRP priorities to 110 on the left 6509. I have HSRP running between the ISP routers and V LAN 101 of the 6509's. This works as I can ping yahoo and Google just fine from the 6509 switch. I can't get from my laptop connected to V LAN 23 to the internet.
It doesn't even attempt to NAT as there are no translations. I have public address assigned by my ISP configured between the ISP routers and my 6509 on V LAN 101. I then have the public address assigned to V LAN 100. I configured V LAN 100 on the switch and V LAN 100 on the FWSM with the IP address in the drawing. I have my NAT statements and route in my FWSM according to the drawing as well. On the switch, I have a default route to X.X.12.19 which is the VIP between the ISP routers. I can reach anything on the inside of my network, including the old network addresses from V LAN 23.
1. Is it best to do NAT at the FWSM or should I do it on the MSFC connected to the ISP routers?
2. If I have to configure NAT at the FWSM, does this requires me to extend the public network down to the FWSM?
3. I'll take any examples you may have as I am stuck.
I am having issues trying to track down what is causing a high number of connection on our FWSM in our core 6509 switch. I recently upgraded my FWSM to 3.1(20) and I'm looking for a tool to be able to find the culprit. When I receive these messages I try to get onto the firewall in time to be able to get information regarding this issue but by the time I do the device recovers. Is there a way to tweat the threshold of the SNMP trap for high connections? Is there any way I can retreive this information via SNMP? Is there are command that will allow me to extract the local IP making the most connections?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI happen to noticed the FWSM was dropping packets at about 387 packets every 5 minutes. My outside FWSM is WAN facing and has a 1gig link (35% utilized) my inside facing has about 100 downstream switches to the closets. I do not see my 6509's back plane is being over utilized and my understanding of the FWSM show be go for 5 gig so it isn't oversubscribe. Why i am seeing packets dropped?
[Code] ......
I am trying to set up a site to site ipsec connection. AT site A, I have Vlan's 652-10.55.216.0/24, Vlan653 -10.55.217.0/24, Vlan 654-10.55.217.0/24 and Vlan655-10.55.219.0/24 and at site B, Vlan650-10.55.214.0/24 and Vlan651-10.55.215.0/24.The problem is that I am unable to get any associations when i do a "sh crypto isakmp sa"/"sh crypto ipsec sa" on either router at each site.I am also unable to ping by pluging in a laptop into the site at each site. Laptop at site A is set to access vlan 655 and laptop at site B is set to acess vlan 651. I can ping all the devices from one end to the other.I have turned on debug crypto isakmp, debug crypto ipsec, debug crypto ipsec errors but dont get anything at all as output.I have attached the sh run for each router Cisco (1941/K9) and switch (Catalyst 3750) at each site.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have attached a pdf of an example of a FWSM configuration with shared interfaces. Now what I dont get is (please refer to the link) url...Is there any difference between the natting that they have done on page B-4 on Context A.as opposed to configuring a static NAT for processing traffic to correct context nat(inside,outside) 209.165.201.0 10.1.2.0.The other question is on page B-2 (diagram) Context A has a customer A network linked to the inside interface. Is it possible to put a default route towards that "Network 2" cloud and restrict traffic from the 6509 switch towards the context A?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have problem with traffic coming from GRE interface and going further through FWSM on the same 6509-E chassis.It's very interesting and confusing. If packets are fragmented, I can go through, however, if I use normal packets (usual ping for example) traffic goes from outside to inside and stops on it's way back.
Here is the detailed info:
WS-C6509-E with WS-SUP720-3B
FWSM HW 4.0, SW 4.1(4)
GRE is done in hardware (source is loopback interface - only one loopback per GRE tunnel).