Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 Not Reaching Particular IP?
Apr 7, 2012
We have a Cisco ASA 5510 Base License with 7.08 our provider assigned us x.x.199.41 as gateway while the ASA is on x.x.199.42 in the 255.255.255.248 subnet... I tried mapping our servers with x.x.199.43 on server1 and x.x.199.44 on server2... server2 can be reached from outside while server1 is unreacheable and our provider is insisting the issue is with our firewall configuration below is our running config..
ASA Version 7.0(8)
!
names
dns-guard
!
interface Ethernet0/0
I have FWSM v4.0 installed on Cisco 7609 router and when I want to configure FWSM services on it, VLAN traffic is not passing through the FWSM or not Reaching upto fwsm
I recently upgraded to the 107Mbps service from sudden link. The tech tested my signal coming into the house and it proved to be very strong. I then hooked up the Motorola Surboard Docsis 3.0 modem via hardline to my iMAC and my brother's PC running 7. He and I both did the speed test and we are only getting 50-75 Mbps. The tech claimed we needed to wait and the speed would build up, but its been 24 hours and still around the 50-75 range. We also got higher rated cables to ensure that there was no loss. I made sure the settings in the modem was set to send out 107Mbps and the Tech agreed that the modem was capable of delivering the speed. Both my brother's PC and my iMac are within 3 to 4 months old. The modem is also about 6 months old. why the speed is not clocking at or near 100Mbps.
I have 2 SSIDs mapped to 2 VLANs (other VLANs are configured, but not used) Security is set to WPA2
What do I need to change to get higher connection speed? What is the highest for this model? Why won't it let me select 40Mhz channel width? Telnet says on 20Mhz available (GUI says it is in "Least congested" mode even though it is not)
i have a network setup like the image in the link(url) and am asking how to make the PC's behind the router to reach the mail server??,when i ping the ip of the server i get timeout.
CBWFQ kicks in when the interface becomes congested and there is no available space in the queue but I need to find a solution to the scenario below:Im using a Gigabit interface on the 3945 Router that connects to the ISP. The ISP limits bandwidth to 60Mb so I need to make sure when I reach the limit of the 60Mb the router starts using the BW percentages defined in the policy-map using classes. any kind of traffic go out as it wants but as soon as the 60Mb limit is reached, the priorities defined by the traffic classes will kick in just as if the interface ran out of queues (as CBWFQ usually works).
I'm running an Optiplex 330 with the Broadcom NetXtreme 57xx Gigabit ethernet card.
The computer is running Windows 7, 64bit, but there do not appear to be any drivers for that OS.I tried selecting Vista 64bit, but there were no drivers. The Vista 32bit doesn't work.
Then I went to Broadcom and found these drivers: [URL] the W764bit drivers didn't change the fact i'm still on a 100Mbit card (as seen on Local Area Connection Status screen and the Device manager)
I have some problem with the ASA 5510 ver 7.0(6). My manager wants to keep this as backup. tried lots of things but still users not able to access internet nor can i ping anywhere.For example when i ping 4.2.2.2 i dont get any reply.The runing config is below for ur ref :
I need to create a firewalled segment that not only separates hosts from general population, but also from each other. The solitary confinement of firewalled segments.I know that I could create a bunch of sub-interfaces, one for each host or group that needs to be isolated, but I'd really rather not have to do that if possible. 1) It could become a management nightmare between ACLs and sub-interfaces and 2) it's a waste of IP addresses.s there any way that I can create a bunch of separate VLANs behind the firewall and have them all terminate at the firewall, using a single firewall IP address for the gateway?
I have a ASA 5510 firewall with CSC module and Security Plus license for CSC module.Will you tell me how to configure my firewall to send emails to particular mail ID when someone login into the firewall or any virus attacks from outside.
We were having a discussion of ios firewall vs. asa for smaller clients(less than 50). On using ios firewall(zbf or cbac)and an asa 5505/5510. One of the arguments brought up on using ios firewall on the router is that a router will do an ip sla failover. I have configured a number of isr's for this and i know it works good.
I would just like to to open UDP port 123 in the ASA 5510 Firewall so that our Primary Domain Controller could use this port to sync time with an external time source. We have already added an access rule for this port under the firewall configuration in ASDM 6.4 and this port was also allowed in the inbound and outbound rule of the PDC's Firewall but it seems that it was still blocked.
I am quite new to firewall, in my company one asa 5510 firewall is there.I configured inside, outside, dns, dhcp and nating.I need to config bandwidth limit (1Mbps) for inside port and I restruct like facebook, youtube and pornsites..And I heard that some subscription is required, really is it required?
I have an ASA 5510 in a live environment. Up til a short while ago I could access this via the ASDM and ssh. However I can no longer connect to it via eithier. When I access It via SSH I get a disclaimer saying the following
*** You have entered a restricted zone! Authorized access only!!! Disconnect immediately if you are not authorized user! ***
It then cuts me off.
When I try to access the ASDM I get the following
The firewall is running all its services without a problem and I can ping the device without any issues. Also none of the config (to my knpowledge has been changed). I set up a console session and http server enable is still there with
I have just configured identity firewall on our ASA 5510.I have 3 nodes that authenticates against Active Directory, using the Windows Server 2008 R2 builtin Network Policy Server: A laptop, a stationary PC, and a Android Phone. All 3 nodes are authenticated using the same user/password.
Now, in ASDM -> Monitoring -> Properties -> Identity -> Users, I can see two of the nodes with my user name attached to it, namely the laptop and the stationary PC.But not the Android phone.
Then it dawned on me. To set up the ADAgent properly, you have to apply 2 group policy entries. Unfortunately, those 2 entries are applied to the Computer Configuraton part of the Group Policy.This means that your COMPUTER has to be a member of your domain for USER IDENTITY to work.So my Android phone and other nodes not a member of the AD Machine Store will never be detected by identity rules, and can roam the network free.
I'm trying to install an ASA 5510 transparent firewall using ASA version 8.4(3)9 but I don't understand how traffic will ever pass through my firewall if both interfaces are on the same sub net(V lan) as the host and it's default gateway? The reason I'm doing this is were installing UAG (or Direct Access) and the UAG appliance need to have public IP's but still be behind a firewall (see attached diagram).
Looking at the documentation (which all seems to be for 5505's running 8.2) it almost seems like i need to have the transparent firewall 'in-line' to the ISP router?, but this router services another IP address range on another v lan for other (routed) firewalls (not shown on diagram) so putting it 'in-line' is not possible. Surely this can't be the case can it? If not how is it supposed to be cabled up and configured so packets go through the firewall?
I currenty have 2 cisco 5510 firewalls one of the firewals is completly dead but contains a Cisco ASA SSM-10 can i remove this card and just place it into a working unit, will i have any problems doing so.
I am unable to see 4th interface on my firewall i.e fastether0/3 on my firewall ASA 5510.
Below is the output. ciscoasa# sh int ip br Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol Ethernet0/0 x.x.x.x YES CONFIG up up Ethernet0/1 x.x.x.x YES CONFIG up up Ethernet0/2 unassigned YES unset administratively down down Internal-Control0/0 127.0.1.1 YES unset up up Internal-Data0/0 unassigned YES unset up up Management0/0 192.168.1.1 YES CONFIG up up
This is my first time to use the Cisco ASA 5500 family. I have a request from a user to create an access rule, to allow all LAN traffic to Destination IP address 165.241.29.17, 165.241.31.254 with Destination TCP port 5060,5061,5070 and UDP port 50000-52399.
We have setup new ip camera system and as per our vendor to access the camera from outside we need to open,TCP ports and in firewall and forward to our camera server.
Let say our public ip address is 207.114.111.22 and our local ip address for the camera is 11.11.1.30. We have cisco asa 5510.
We've in our company a Cisco Asa 5510 v8.4(3), Asdm 6.4(7) and a SSM-CSC-10-K9. The firewall is in transparent mode. I get an exchange 2003 SP2 server behind. When users trying to send mailing lists with many recipients (above 300), the Exchange server didn't send these mails. I'm pretty sure that this problem come from the ASA Firewall, because when I plug my server directly on my Internet Connection, the mailing list is sent. I've search on the web, and disable "ESMTP Inspection", but it didn't work. [code]
I have CISCO 5510 firewall running with IOS ASA821-k8.bin.My company has purchased another ASA5510 with IOS ASA843-k8.bin.We need to run both firewalls in Active/Standby mode.
If I upgrade the IOS of old firewall to ASA843-k8.bin the the running configurations does not work properly.It does not pick the network objects and NAT rules as they are configured with OLD IOS and running.
Or if I restore the configurations of old firewall at New ASA the result is worst. Even firewall with new IOS does not show any Access Rule and NAT rule and does not supprt network objects.
So I loaded the shiny new ASA 9.0(1) on a test/dev cluster of 5510's with the SecPlus license.In 8.4.4 (or maybe 8.4.3?) new password-policy commands were introduced, which allowed for very granular password policies for local users. This appears to be gone in 9.0.1. Is this by design? These commands met certain compliance regulations. EIGRP is supported in multiple context mode now, however the contexts dont appear to form EIGRP neighborships with each other on a shared interface. I did issue the mac-address auto command in system mode if that matters. All contexts do form EIGRP neighborships with a regular IOS device, however routes are still not propegated from CTX1 to CTX2, 3, etc.It's entirely possible I'm doing something wrong, this is my first stab at multiple contexts, or its possible this doesnt work by design?
I am using ASA5510 as firewall and vpn is configured. Inside my office i have two networks one with 10.X.X.X and 192.X.X.X . My inside firewall interface configured with 10.X.X.X network.
When I connect from outside using VPN client I can access 10.X.X.X network but other network I can't access.How can I make it.
I have a Cisco ASA 5510 connected to 2 private lans (1 for my HQ pc's{inside} and 1 for the worldwide mpls{outside}) It is also connected to the public internet at interface "public" and my dmz at "dmz" interface. I suspect I have a routing issue because packet-trace yields allow, the nat looks ok and the objects look ok at least to me but I'm the one with the non working config so...Basically this is the desired flow:
1. I need all traffic from the inside to be able to flow to the outside unimpeded as they are both trusted networks. (this is ok right now as I allow everything via access-list 101.)
2. I need any host on the public internet to be able to reach a server on the dmz via the pat which I set up from the "public" interface to the "DMZ" interface. The desired flow would be that the person on the internet types in [URL] and this is directed to the public interface ip which forwards to the webserver object on the dmz. (I cannot get this working any which way)
3. I need the dmz to be able to communicate with another server on the mpls via the "outside" interface when it recieves the request from the public it then checks with this other server on the outside via nat(translating the dmz range into the ip of the outside interface on the firewall)I have a default route that points to the mpls or outside interface for 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 via 10.x.x.1 - (and although I'm not sure I suspect this could be conflicting with traffic that needs to be sent to the "public" interface .... meaning that the firewall should dump packets bound for 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 to the public interface - 184.x.x.194 but I'm very reluctant to change the default route as this is in production and I'm not sure how it will affect traffic).However, I do suspect that if I changed the route from default to static as such:
route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 10.x.x.1 (this would get all lan and mpls traffic to the mpls gateway) route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 184.x.x.193 (this would send everything else from public to the public internet gateway)I think this is accurate but then I would bypassing my corporate internet proxy which is behind the mpls gateway at 10.x.x.1? Is there a way to get http traffic originating from the lan (10.x.x.x) to use the mpls gateway and http traffic for the dmz to use the public internet gateway at 184.x.x.193. I don't want to start causing a flow problem for the internet nor do I want to bypass my corp internet proxy.Either way I cannot get this to work, eventhough the logic checks out, I cannot get even a ping response when I allow icmp any any for testing. Note: I can ping resources on each network from the firewall, not only it's own ports in the associated network but other resources on those networks as well.
Here is the running-config:
ciscoasa# sho run : Saved : ASA Version 8.4(1) ! hostname ciscoasa domain-name marcjacobs.lvmh
We currently have two ASA 5510 firewalls in two locations. One in each and they don't have a standby pair. Now, I wanted to put them together in one site and replace the other one with ASA5520. Now my question is, I need to know if the ASA5510 hardware are the same type. They are both ASA 5510 but I am wondering why the other firewall is displaying ASA-5510-K8 and the other one is only ASA-5510.
I'm having a problem with an ASA 5510 and software from Manage Engine (Firewall Analyzer). They are saying that sys log 113019 is not getting data over to the server where the firewall analyzer is installed. I'm checking the config and I see it enabled. Why this particular sys log info isn't making it to the reporting software when other data is.
