Cisco Firewall :: How To Filter L2L Traffic To A PIX 7.2(4) (or ASA)
Feb 6, 2013
I've got a PIX running 7.2(4) with its outside interface on the Internet. The only thing this PIX is doing is acting as the endpoint for an IPSEC LAN-to-LAN tunnel with an Internet-connected ASA on another network.
I'd like to filter inbound Internet traffic to this PIX so that only the designated ASA can attempt to establish an IPSEC connection -- in other words, I want to prevent any other device on the Internet from even being able to attempt to establish an IPSEC connection to the PIX. As far as I know (and have seen), this can't be done with an access-list on the outside interface, since that access-list doesn't apply to traffic to the PIX itself.
I am having a setup with a 2851 router & websense url filtering server where I need to forward the traffic to websense server for all the internet requests. The http traffic is getting filtered properly, but the https traffic is not getting filtered. The two commands I ahev given for http & http are as follows: ip inspect name test http urlfilter ip inspect name test https.
Most of our VPN connections are done with our Cisco 3030 and the internet goes out the ASA. We are able to filter all web traffic by doing a a span port for web traffic.
When we move VPN connections to the ASA we will loose the ability to span web traffic becuase its coming in and going out the same interface on the ASA. We will loose the ability to filter web traffic when this happens.
How we can filter web traffic on VPN connections on the ASA. We are using websense. I know there is some integration that can be done with the ASA and websense but it doesn't have all the capabilities as doing a span port for websense to monitor.
Is it possible to configure cisco router like C3800 or catalyst switches like C4500 or C2960 to filter traffic based on allowable mac addresses only? I would like only to allow those devices that belongs to the domain, meaning if a user connects a computer or any devices that concerns network which I have not allowed the mac addresses, it will be denied access to the network. However, any of the allowable devices could able to use any port of the switch, meaning I dont want to associate an allowable Mac Address to a physical port on the switch.
I have a site to site VPN setup between a 5510 and 5505. All traffic is sent ovet the VPN from the remote site to the home office. Everything is working fine but the remote site "www" traffic is not going to the Barracuda. ISP -> CISCO ASA -> Barracuda -> Internal Switch.The Barracuda is setup "inline" with the internal network.
We have a lot of IPX traffic flowing through a switched network and we are being asked to filter it from a network standpoint. At one point they were using IPX in their network, but no longer need to, so they still have a lot of machines spewing out IPX traffic. We have removed the IPX routing commands from our distribution switches, (Cisco 6500), but after running a short 10 minute Wireshark capture I'm still getting a good bit of IPX traffic from a lot of different devices.
I have a ASA 5585 and a Nexus 5596, and i need a sugestion to configure this cenário:
My users in the Vlan 10 need access on the network in the Vlan 20, but this traffic must be filtered for firewall. In the firewall a received a trunk port for Nexus 5596, and i created subinterfaces to receive the Vlans for this trunk.
The gateway for my users is the address for the ASA subinterfaces.
What i do to filter the traffic between the Vlans?
We want to filter IP traffic by MAC address on Catalyst 4500. Since we are using bonding (active-backup mode) we need those mac addresses appear on different ports. Below are solutions that we have tried: ACL but it does not work since mac acls only match non ip traffic (We CAN NOT use ip acl). Use a static mac address-table entry to ALLOW specific mac addresses. It does not work either since the same MAC address needs to be seen on a different port. Catalyst 4500 does not support auto-learn option (as e.g. Nexus 5000).
I'm decommissioning my SonicWall PRO 3060 and upgrading to an ASA5550 (we're increasing our WAN link speed to 1Gig and need the 5550). In any case, I want to copy over the configuration from the PRO to the ASA. I have everything documented and I've started doing the changeover, but in looking at some other network diagrams on the net I'm seeing router symbols between the LAN switches and the ASA and I'm beginning to worry that I might need routers to do this which, of course, would increase cost quite a bit.
So my question is this: If I have a core switch carved into multiple VLANs and I connect each VLAN to a port on the ASA, will I be able to route and filter traffic from VLAN to VLAN through the ASA? If so how, in general, is this accomplished (I'm betting ACLs). I think that the ASA will be able to do this easily, but I just want to be sure before I get too far into the configuration of this unit,.
I have upgraded to the new RV042G to take advantage of the gigabit Ethernet speeds and to prepare for when our ISP upgrades our bandwidth. I currently use the RV042 with Protect Link enabled to filter out various categories from our network traffic. I noticed that this feature is not included with the RV042G.
Is this something Cisco will decide to add back in later? In the meantime, how to block content on the network? The basic URL and keyword filter will not meet our needs, since it is much easier to let a service such as Trend Micro manage what is blocked in the categories they offer.
I have couple C2960G and C3750. Is there any way to filter (on ingress port) type of traffic? I would like to allow IP only, and discard (i.e.) IPX, or other garbage, that any device can produce.I have tried to find something about this, but only thing I have found is feature : protocol filter, which doesn't seems to be working on my hardware.
I have a cisco asa 5505 firewall. Is it possible to block secure websites in it like [URL]? I have already tried regular expression filtering but it filters only http traffic.
I had to edit an ACL on an active S2S VPN today because traffic was being denied from a host onsite to a host on the remote site (port 449). After I made the change, we tried to make the connection again, but it was still denied. Do we need to tear down the S2S vpn for the change to the ACL to take effect? Also, what if we just wait for the connection to rekey itself? Will it work after that?
is there any way to apply hostname or object network in the syntax? The command gives the option to use hostname or A.B.C.D but doesn't accept the hostname PIX1(config)# filter url except 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 ?configure mode commands/options: Hostname or A.B.C.D The address of foreign/external host which is destination for connections requiring filtering Can an FQDN be used as a foreign/external host?
We have Cisco ASA 5520 with csc ssm 10 (product ver. Trend Micro InterScan for Cisco CSC SSM 6.6.1125.0)in Web>Global settings> URL filtering > Rules > Communications and Search> Social Networking category is set to block during work time and allow during leisure time(see the attachement), but rule for this category won't work. I mean social networking sites are always remain allowed.
I am using an ASA 5510 firewall in routed mode.How can I filter incoming traffic by mac address on the AS 5510 ? I have already setup a static access rule for rdp users on the outside to access a terminal server on the inside.Now, i would like to further limit access from specific computers only.
I have a problem with my ASA5505 after enabling botnet filter my ASA reboots.Also while booting it usualy takes around 30minutes of random cycles before loading the OS. It seems to be falling at the license check.To fix the boot I usualy unplug the ASA for about 15minutes and then it will boot up fine.
We care currently using an ASA5505 as our firewall and redirecting web traffic to a S160 Iron port. Recently the web filter stopped working and the only way to get filtering again is to reset the redirection.
1. Is there any available log information to find out about the WCCP process and maybe way it stops?
2. Are there keep alive packets or anything of that natural between the ASA and Ironport?
I am currently trying to enable WCCP between a Cisco ASA 5512 firewall and Barraccuda Webfilter 410 Vx applicance. The ASA firewall is running IOS version 8.6(1)2 and the Barracuda is funning firemware 6.0.0.013. Both the ASA and Barracuda are in the same network and can ping eachother. The ASA has several interfaces, outside, inside, data and dmz. The PCs and barracuda appliance are behind the data interface. ASA data IP 172.16.18.1 Barracuda IP 172.16.18.40 All PCs in the 172.16.18.0/24 subnet use the ASA as the default gateway and should have web requests redirected to the Barracuda.
I suspect my issue is that the ASA is generating a Router Identifier of 172.21.20.1 which is my inside network and the barracuda cannot communicate with it. how I can get this working ?
We are looking to implement traffic shaping/policing primarily for P2P traffic. As natively the ASA5550 is only capable of p2p inspection if the traffic is tunneled via port 80 is the AIP-SSM the way forward? We have 2 5550s in active/active failover config. As a side note we are also looking to implement an IDS/IPS system so could this module cover all?Is this module going to provide the desired outcome or is there another module/device out there better suited for this? I would prefer to use the ASA5550s as opposed to implementing another product if only that we can make use of the investment we already made on these devices.
I seem to be experiencing a problem with content filtering on our 1941, if I add anymore patterns to the policy below the router crashes and requires a reboot, not sure why?
parameter-map type urlfpolicy trend cptrendparacatdeny0 max-request 5000 max-resp-pak 1000
We have a Cisco ASA 5520 and Web sense. I added a filter but it seems like it is still not allowing us to access a certain website from most of the machines however some machines with the same configuration work on the DMZ. Accessing website tells us:
"Firefox has detected that the server is redirecting the request for this address in a way that will never complete".
I am testing limit bandwith using my ASA 8.2, i am trying to limit internet access for certains users , i order to save Bandwith for the important things but i can´t get any limitation
My configuration is the following, the acces list is just for my pc in order to test, and the service policy is applied to outside interface (called internet in my case) for incoming traffic
access-list Internet_mpc_1 extended permit ip host 172.16.127.70 any class-map Internet-class-TEST match access-list Internet_mpc_1 policy-map Internet-policy-web class Internet-class-TEST police output 1024000 1500
service-policy Internet-policy-web interface Internet
With show service policy i can´t see any activity on the policy , but if i do a similar configuration for inside interface outgoing traffic i can see packets allowed and dropped
