Cisco :: LMS 4.2 Sub-interface Not Available In Instance Selection
Apr 26, 2013
I have sub-interfaces created on the switch and are in active(up/up) state,but these sub-interface not available for selection in the instance window while creating the poller, and am not able to monitor the traffic on these sub interface in the performance management.
LMS will not display the interfaces in the instance selection window if they are not active, but here the sub-interface are in active state but these are not available.
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Mar 12, 2013
We have a number of 1552e's deployed as RAP / MAPs, using a 5508 WLC. All those are working fine.I have a few requirements for an outdoor access point... not a RAP or MAP, but just a simple outdoor AP. I assume that if I use a 1552e for that requirement, I would place the mode in local, rather than in bridge mode, correct ? Also, a question on mac filtering. When setting up the mac filter, there is a drop down selection for "interface name". The radios seem to work fine with "none" selected, so I'm confused about what exactly that selection is doing. Is it simply a reference lable, or does it actually have a purpose?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 27, 2011
is there a way to have multiple instances of user custom attributes and insert those as multiple instances of the A/V Pair in the authorisation profile in ACS 5.2/5.3 ?Background: We have to migrate a ACS 4.2 to 5.3. In ACS 4.2 our client used the multiline attribute
Number
#Name
#Description
#Type of Value
#Inbound/Outbound
[code]....
to specify multiple routes to various networks in the RADIUS reply spcific for every single PPP username of routers dialing in.Using the internal user database, extended by a string attribute and using that attribute as source of a dynamic value in the access-policy works basically. But as I have only ONE single line instance of the attribute for every user, I can only return ONE framed-route.We have lots of cases where multiple routes have to be assigned to one router.I 'd like to avoid defining a seperate access profile for every remote RAS router for external PPP Dial-In...[URL]
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 29, 2013
When attempting to register an ACS instance to a primary (via System Administration -> Operations -> Local Operations -> Deployment Operations), I receive the following error as a popup in my browser:
"This System Failure occurred: /opt/CSCOacs/db/acs.crt (No such file or directory). Your changes have not been saved.Click OK to return to the list page."
I had 2 ACS 1120 appliances clustered, 1 suffered a hardware failure about a year ago so I replaced it with a VM. That one is now the primary. I'm now wanting to replace the secondary instance (the remaining 1120 appliance) with a VM as well. I removed the current appliance from the network, installed the VM using the same IP address, and attempted to register. It failed as per the above error. After trying this a number of times, I then decided to return the 1120 appliance to secondary status and attempted to register it with the same results as above.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 30, 2012
I have done some searching, but I am unable to find a solution to this problem. I am wondering if there are any solutions that I was unable to find.
View 13 Replies
View Related
Feb 8, 2012
I am having some issue with SPT with the following topology.Pair of Nexus 5548 and 3750 are configured with MST instance 1.when enable STP as MST on Dell switches , it does not recognise it and create loop but if We change MST0 (only tried on one 3750 and two Dell switches in triangle in lab). its work fine.Does Dell switches only understand MST0 ?Can Nexus 5548 support MST0 if we change from MST1 and what will be effect?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 26, 2012
I'm having problems getting FTP to work through two FWSM virtual contexts which are connected via a vrf. All this is configured on a 6500 switch with the FWSM running 3.1(4)
CLIENT-----CONTEXT_1-------VRF------CONTEXT_2--------FTP_SERVER
At the moment we can make the control connection but when we issue commands the connection times out.
Looking at the logs we can see the initial connection made to the server on port 21 from the client, this is also seen on the second firewall context (nearest the FTP server). The data channel is then seen on the first context, made using high src & dst port numbers and initiated from the client, successfully passing the ACL/Inspection, then on the second context we see the connection being denied by the incoming ACL on the second contexts interface connected to the VRF instance.
The rules are identical on the contexts and have been made by copying and paste the rule using CSM, we are using the predefined service group 'FTP-Group' which contains both tcp 20 & 21. FTP inspection is at default on both contexts.
We have tested with Win XP (capable of Active FTP only) & Firefox 3.6.12 which is the connections we are seeing in the logs trying to do Passive FTP.
Is this a problem with teh contexts randomizing sequence numbers or TCP Normalization? Or do we just have a problem with the Inspection engine on one of the contexts (I would have expected to see this on both contexts if it was a bug).
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 28, 2013
I'm using ACS 5.4p2 within distributed systems: one primary and one secondary instance.For now, primary instance is acting as Log Collector server and I can see any AAA audit logs.
When the primary instance fails I can authenticate successfully using the secondary instance.However, when primary instance comes back, I'm not able to see any audit logs operated by secondary.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Feb 23, 2013
I have been tasked with migrating 24 access switches from their current distribution switches, 2x stack 3750's to a their new 4500 distribution switches. Ideally with no downtime. My plan for this was to connect the 4500's to the 3750's and create replica vlans on the 4500's therefore spanning the L2 broadcast domain across both sets of switches.
Each one of the vlans that had been created on the 4500's would have the STP bridge priority set to 4096 and 8192. When one of the uplinks from the access switches to the old 3750 stack is connected to the 4500's, as I understand this should have a stp cost of 4 and move the old uplink into discarding therefor passing traffic across the new link. This would then allow me to disconnect the old link and connect it to the second 4500 as the L2 traffic is spanned between all switches. Not ideal but the only way I can see this working.
Once each of these switches have been moved, the SVI's and static routes will be moves from the 3750 stack to the 4500s.The problem I have is that I've ran out of the available STP instances I can use, these 3750's all seem to be at 128 already so as far as I know, is that if a loop was to be formed when the 128 allocation is hit this would indeed cause loop in the network.I have a total of in use vlans to be spanned of 700. I'm unaware how many instances of stp the 4500's can deal with however I can bet it's not 700. 3000 logical interfaces I believe is the maximum I can see online with regards to how many stp instances the 4500's can use.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 7, 2012
what is the maximum number of AAA clients supported by a single ACS5.3 instance?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 7, 2011
I have a router with 2 WAN (MPLS) connections to two different IPSs.One connection is a 3mbs MLPPP connection and the other is a 10mbs MetroEthernet connection.Both use BGP to peer up with the ISP with private AS numbers (65001, 65002, etc)I want the router to always prefer (use) the BGP connection through the 10mbs link, but here are my considerations:I can't change the prefix length for the peers. In other words, BGP 65001 is going to advertise 192.168.21.0 /24 to its peer, and BGP 65002 is going to advertise the same network with the same mask.What is the best way to make sure the 10mbs link is always preferred? Can I do local preference?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 4, 2011
I am designing a new NAT configuration for an ASA 8.4
On my PIX 8.0 configuration I needed to allow bidirectional traffic between interfaces with different security levels. For example, Inside at 100 and dmz at 50.To accomplish this in 8.0 I used a static NAT command along with any necessary ACLs.
I now need to apply this same 8.0 config for 8.4. With the static command not availablein 8.4 I am unsure of which NAT commands to use to achieve the bidirectional traffic.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 20, 2012
I multi homed to dual ISPs using a single 6509e. Currently, I am only receiving a default from wash ISP and marking one with a higher local pref. most of my traffic flow is inbound, so this config meets my need. The issue I have: if either ISP has has an outage upstream from my directly connected peer, my router does not detect that and continues to send traffic out thru that provider only to be black holed. My 6509 will only support 256k routes, so full route tables isn't an option. I could receive partials from each ISP. Is there any other method to detecting this upstream ISP issue and then adjusting my local pref on my default to use the alternate provider path?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 4, 2013
I multi homed to dual ISPs using a single 6509e. Currently, I am only receiving a default from wash ISP and marking one with a higher local pref. most of my traffic flow is inbound, so this config meets my need. The issue I have: if either ISP has has an outage upstream from my directly connected peer, my router does not detect that and continues to send traffic out thru that provider only to be black holed. My 6509 will only support 256k routes, so full route tables isn't an option. I could receive partials from each ISP. Is there any other method to detecting this upstream ISP issue and then adjusting my local pref on my default to use the alternate provider path?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 11, 2012
We purchased an ASA 5505 (ASA5505-BUN-K9) and more recently purchased the license to upgrade it from 10 to 50 users (L-ASA5505-10-50). I would like to provide remote access to users via AnyConnect - specifically, AnyConnnect on Windows plus the iPhone/iPad and Android versions. My understanding is that I should purchase the Anyconnect Essentials (L-ASA-AC-E-5505) and Anyconnect Mobile (L-ASA-AC-M-5505) licenses. Is this correct? If I do this, how many simultaneous remote access VPN connections (via Anyconnect clients) will the ASA then support?
Further, we did not initially purchase Smartnet with this device, but I would like to do so to gain access to software updates. Is there a site or document where I can locate the SKU #'s for Smartnet contracts that would be appropriate with our device?
The output of "show version" is below:
Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software Version 8.3(1)
Device Manager Version 6.3(1)
Compiled on Thu 04-Mar-10 16:56 by builders
System image file is "disk0:/asa831-k8.bin"
Config file at boot was "startup-config"
[code]....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 21, 2011
We are going to purchase a Device , thte sites and also VPN server for remote access ( EzVPN), Should we use ASA or should we use Cisco 1800 series router with security software. The main purpose of this device is to terminate all VPN connections ( Site-to-site) and remote access.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 4, 2011
Our company is in the process of replacing our old firewall with a Cisco ASA since our old firewall can handle only 170 concurrent users and we are expanding fast. Can I know what are the considerations when selecting from the different models of ASA currently we are debating if we should buy a 5510 or a 5520 also can I know if cisco ASA also have a limitations on concurrent users online in a lan like our old firewall. By the way we are a Call Center company(going 500 seats) so we are using VOIP(Asterisk using SIP and IAX).
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 24, 2012
i want to install a 3500e. I have a hole in my wireless network where this AP will be a perfect fit. I do have a wireless controller running code 6.x, so I think I will need to upgrade to 7 which is not a big deal.
The problem I have is the antenna selection. Since the AP has MIMO multiple-inputs multiple-inputs I’m perplexed on the type of antenna to choose. Since the environment is a warehouse the Omni directional would be preferred - should I also add the dipole antenna for close proximity to the AP. Also, I noticed in the getting started guide the 3500e has 6 external connection points 3 for 2.4 and 3 for 5 GHz. The antenna documentation says to use dual-band antennas, but this contradicts what is shown in the getting started guide. So what antennas should I get to make the 3500e work in a warehouse environment.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 9, 2013
I am using Cisco 7609 IOS15.0(1)S1 and Cisco 3600 IOS 15.1(2)EY.I am trying to provision VPNs over MPLS network.All I found in the documentation is how I attach a whole interface to a VRF.However, I need to be able to attach a VLAN (or any other matching criteria, for that matter) to a VRF.In other words, I want to be able to attach port 1/1 vlan 100 to VRF-A and port 1/1 vlan 200 to VRF-B.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 19, 2013
through asa webvpn we need to provide our user remote destkop access; we would not use static rdp:// bookmarks for this accomplishmet as this would grow too much management effort with bookmarks updating. Our strategy would be to give users the "url entry" bar where they can input the resource name (example: "pc-flavio.mydomain") so the management effort is outplaced to the guys who manage the dns server. This stated, we noticed that most end-users would get in troubles because of the default-ing "url-protocol" is http://, so they don't change it to the correct rdp:// from the drop-down list and don't have the java-rdp applet started. There is a chance to admin the default protocol for URL Entry Functions? Our setup is asa 5510 ver 9.1, act/stb failover.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 14, 2011
I just installed a new ACS 5.1 to authenticate wireless PEAP users, so I created an Access policy "WirelessUsers" with identity store being Windows Active directory and all domain users are selected, and create a service rule that dictates that if the authentication protocol is radius, network device belongs to WLC device group, the result service will be "WirelessUsers", so this part worked perfectely, all domain users are able to gain wireless access via their DOMAIN/usernames and domain passwords. Now I want ACS local indentity store users (those local usernames can be the same or different from their AD usernames) to be able to manage those controllers, so I created another access policy "DeviceAdminUsers" with identity store being local users, another service rule which says that if the authentication protocol is radius, network device belongs to WLC device group, the result service will be "DeviceAdminUsers". The problem is that with the setup, whenenve when I try to SSH to WLC, ACS always put me in "WirelessUsers" access policy, even the login name does not have DOMAIN pre-pended or the login name simly does not exist in AD. if I put the second rule in front of first rule, I am able to authenticate with ACS local username/password and gain access to WLC, but wireless users will fail to authenticate, because ACS is trying to put regular wiress users in "DeviceAdminUsers" access policy. I would expect if username does not exist in AD, ACS should proceed with next rule. Similar requirement was easily achieved in ACS 3.3.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 18, 2013
I'm trying to configure IP pool selection by RADIUS on ACS 5-3-0-40-7.So, I went to configuring the cisco-assign-ip-pool (Cisco VSA 218) attribute within some test authorization profile but discovered that cisco-assign-ip-pool is an integer (?!) and (therefore) accepts digits only.
As far as I can remember, we used to put pool *names* within ip:addr-pool
(something along those lines: cisco-avpair = "ip:addr-pool=test-pool-1").
So how should we configure the values for this attribute in ACS 5?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 3, 2013
We have a campus with both office and industial areas with various propagation problems. Historically I have been installing and maintaining access points in the 1200 range, the latest being the 1242. All these have a similar antenna setup based on diversity pairs.Since Cisco seems to be dropping the old series any week now I have been looking at the 2602 as a replacement.I can find no good documentation on antenna selection and mounting suggestions for these.If I want a proper omni coverage pattern with dual band antennas, do I just set them to a H form assuming the unit is sitting on a wall?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 20, 2012
I try to let Cisco ASA automatic select a tunnel group for users, after user input username and password. I try to do this without user selection a connection profile on login page. Authentication on ASA<>ACS 5.3<>MS AD. How i can will do this? Radius attribute class=group_policy don't work.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 3, 2013
We have a deployment with six 1524SB mesh APs. Two are used as RAPs and face east and west respectively with directional antennas and two MAPs on each side with omni antennas. The RAPs are within 20 feet of each other. I set the bridge group name as east or west depending on which side of the mesh the equipment is located but noticed the downlink channel is set to 56 on both RAPs. I don't remember setting the channel for the RAPs, but they aren't using the global DCA.Would best practice be to change the downlink to unique channels on the RAPs, enable DCA (if it will let me), or is a unique bridge group name sufficient enough?
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 22, 2013
I have a mixed WAN environment with both eBGP and EIGRP routes. The BGP routes should always take precedence, when they exist. If no BGP routes exist I want the router to fail over to using the EIGRP routes. So far, this works fine.
The problem is, when the BGP route again becomes available (and the associated entry appears in the "sh ip bgp ... received-routes" output) the router is NOT relinquishing the EIGRP route. It remains in effect, showing as a "D" route int the route table even though there is a better ("B") route available. If I bounce EIGRP or the interface associated with it, the EIGRP route disappears and the BGP route reasserts itself, and everything will run correctly until the next time the BGP route disappears due to maintenance, line failure, etc.
My router is (C2900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.3(1)T
Here's the associated config
interface Tunnel101
description VPN backup WAN interface
bandwidth 7168
ip address 192.168.75.1 255.255.255.0
[code].....
View 7 Replies
View Related
Apr 17, 2013
We have p2p link that interconnects our data centers and the bandwidth is 150 meg link.In the current architecture, one end of the link is Nexus 7k (data center 1) and other end is catalyst 65k (data center 2)..We are planning to migrate this link to routers. We planned to install 3945 router on both data center and move the p2p link to this routers. [code]
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 5, 2011
I have a requirement to select a farm based on source IP address. I tried creating a match all class-map that matches on the virtual-address and source address but I get this message.LB01/Admin(config-cmap)# match source-address x.x.x.75 255.255.255.255 Error: Only one match virtual-address is allowed in a match-all class-map and it cannot mix with any other match type To me this is the only place where it makes sense to set the source match criteria.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 6, 2012
the best antenna to use in high-ceiling environments, as in 25 feet or higher. He was in favor of using a high gain, omni, such as a the AIR-ANT1728. I was against this form of antenna due to their increased horizontal radiation and decrease of vertical. I was more in favor of an antenna similar to AIR-ANT24 30V-R. I've seen successful deployments with both options, but curious what the community has to say on the matter.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 25, 2012
I'm working with an ACS 5.3 and ASA 8.2.5 and i've configured several access services for webvpn and ipsec remote access profiles but i haven't found which radius attribute can differentiate among them in the service selection rules.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 3, 2012
We are ordering new COWs (Computer On Wheels) for the hospital and they will be using an Intel 6205 Wireless Chip which is a/b/g/n 2x2. The two new floors these devices will be going on will be our first internal hospital entry into 802.11n which I force the clients to run in the 5ghz range for N. Previous to this, all of my cows are G clients and use a 2.2dbi rubber duck for 2.4ghz.
I will be using 1142 AP's, if not 3502 and no I have not performed a survey yet as the floor is still in early construction, but equipment is required to be ordered now. I can tell you that I will be surveying for a voice grade. I suppose my confusion comes from what is the best antenna (obvious open ended question) for this card, being it has two connectors for the 2x2. Again, typically I would use a 2.2 dbi rubber duck for either 2 GHz or dual band 2/5 GHz. Is dual rubber ducks at 6inch spacing (half wavelength met on 2.4 GHz fall back) suffecient or are there other factors involved with the N.
View 22 Replies
View Related
Nov 7, 2011
- I have a cisco unified network (ACS 5.1, Cisco controller, LWAP) and have configured ACS to integrate with AD.
- I am using this network for Laptops and wireless IP phones access.
- I have only one Service Selection rule for both Laptops and wireless IP phones. All the conditions attributes are set to ANY except Protocol = Radius
- I select a simple Identity Policy and I use a sequence where IP phones users are authenticated using ACS local user and the Laptops users are authenticated using AD
- Laptop users are authenticated using PEAP and IP phones users using EAP-Fast
Everything is working fine BUT I need to make 2 changes and eventhough I spent many hours hours on forums and reading articles and trying things myself I can't get the changes to work.
The first change is to use 2 Service Selection Rules one for the IP phones and one for the Laptops. After adding another service selection rules that I put at the top, I tried many combinations to try and get the IP phones to use it but whatever I did (used different combinations of conditions), the IP phones always select the 2nd rule, which is the original one. The question is "what conditions to put in a service selection rule to make wireless IP phones use the rule).
The second change is that I want to add machine authentication so only Laptops that are in AD can access the network. AGain I tried various settings but can't get this to work.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 27, 2013
I have two Cisco ASA 5510s that I would like to configure in an active passive failover setup. The ASAs are at the top of our rack and handle all our routing. We have been only using one ASA unit with one line from our ISP connected to the WAN/outside interface of the ASA. We recently had our ISP setup two lines into our rack using HSRP. I do not know what equipment they are running upstream of our ASAs but it is HSRP so it should be a set of Cisco routers/switches. Originally I thought I could just connect the 2nd new line to our 2nd ASAs WAN/outside port and setup failover using a crossover cable between the ASAs. After doing this config I had problems accessing some of our IPs in the subnet that the HSRP is part of. If I disconnected the 2nd ASAs WAN/outside line everything was fine. After talking with my ISP they explained that I need to connect both of my lines into our L2 network and then from there into the ASAs. Currently below the ASAs I have two Catalyst 3560-X switches. They are connected together with an ISL trunk and ASA-1s inside network connects to switch-1 and ASA-2 to switch-2. One idea was to connect each of the HSRP lines to each of my current switches and then from the switches to the ASA's WAN/outside interface. Finally back down from the ASA's to the switches via the inside interface that we have currently. This kind of seems messy and a poor choice. The other idea is to get two switches that would sit above the ASAs and connect the HSRP lines to them with the switches connected together. They would then connect to the ASAs. I like this idea better but I don't like having to buy two more full switches for this. These switches would only use a couple of ports and only handle just the HSRP ISP lines to the ASAs. Putting in two more 3560-Xs would be a big waste of money and space for this. So I was thinking of using two Cisco SG200-08, 8 port gigabit basic managed switches for this.
View 5 Replies
View Related
