Cisco Routers :: RV220W - Cannot Reorder 10+ Rules
Jan 1, 2013
We are running an RV220W at the latest firmware (1.0.4.17). Due to certain internal activity we had to add a few firewall rules. Once we exceeded 10 firewall rules we could not reorder them. The reorder page showed the first 10 rules OK, but when you display the next screen (for rules 11 upward) the order is different and any changes do not appear persistant. Therefore you can change the order of the first 10 rules, but not from 11 onwards.
View 5 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jul 24, 2012
I need to add some rules to block some attacks. I can add them fine but they get added to the end of the list. I try to re-order the rules to put them at the top and can not. I am using Internet Exploder 8 and I put a checkmark on the rule I want to move then click the reorder button. It takes me to a screen that shows 0 rules. I click the Back button and am back at the list of rules on that page. I am running the latest firmware which is from a year ago.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 27, 2012
I would like to isolate my wlan from the remaining network but with two exceptions. First it sould be possible to print from all devices in the wlan and second... my notebook should not be isolated
Therefore I did the followning steps:
1. Create vlan
2.Set access rules
Basically I blocked any inter-vlan-routing from the wireless vlan. I allowed all traffic from the wireless address range to the printer's ip address. I allowed all traffic from the notebook's ip address to the private vlan.
3. Set a static DHCP entry for the notebook
4. Set an IP/MAC binding entry for the notebook
For some reason I can reach any ip address from any wireless device.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 11, 2012
I face a strange bahavior with my rv220w router : I set up access rules to deny all outbound trafic for a particular IP range. It seems to work fine .... but when I enable content filtering, HTTP access on port 80 works again (and other ports are denied). It seems that activating content filtering makes the router ignore firewall rule.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 5, 2012
I have a problem with firewall rules. If I set some rules for open communication and some for closed, so I cannot reorder from the end to begin.
Last rules are at the end of all. So I can only reorder in one pages.(I have about 33 rules = 3 pages of rules)
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 15, 2012
I have 2 static IP addresses that I'd like to point to 2 corresponding servers in my LAN. I've followed the Access Rule and One-to-One NAT instructions as best I can (screenshots of each for one of the static IP scenarios attached), but no luck. The static IPs bring the outside/WAN user to the RV180's admin login screen.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 14, 2012
I have made a firewall rule that accepts FTP from WAN2 outside to the inside private LAN with IP address specified.But this didn't work.When I added in the forward rules that FTP had to be forwarded to this IP address it worked.I have done some testing but it seems that the firewall rules do not have any priority on the forward rule.If I disable the forward rule i cannot connect with ftp even with a firewall rule made.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Mar 25, 2012
I am having trouble setting nat rules on device SRP527W-U with the latest firmware 1.2.4 (003). The latest firmware 1.2.4 has introduced the possibility to create specific nat rules via "ACL policy rules". I am trying to use this "new feature" not available in the older releases to get my network configuration done. The configuration I would like to do is to have two different vlan. In the vlan1 I would like to nat the PCs via the point_to_point interface and in the vlan2 I don't want use nat feature so each computer will be reachable via public ip address. I have configured two different PVCs on the device.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 10, 2012
I've setup a GroupVPN and connect to the RV042 with the Shrewsoft VPN client, works like a charm as opposed to QuickVPN ;-)The firewall is configured with an explicit deny rule for RDP access to an internal server, also an explicit allow rule is created for certain IP numbers as source. I noticed that I need to create an explicit allow rule for the subnet the Shrewsoft client is using for the virtual adapter or I will not be able to access the internal server via RDP through the GroupVPN tunnel. I would think that setting up a tunnel defies the rules created for direct access on the WAN port.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 26, 2012
I have a static IP block and need to route to various servers. I know I can use 1:1 NAT or Access Rules and have success with each. The problem is my mail server. When I use 1:1 NAT, the mail is sent from the correct IP - the address of my mail server - and there is no problem with reverse lookups. However, I cannot block any ports when I use 1:1 NAT. I have tried it every way I can think of and even some suggestions in the forums that did not work. No matter how I set access rules, all port stay open in 1:1 NAT.
If I delete the 1:1 NAT rule and use Access rules to open specific ports, the mail server sends out the mail from the WAN address. The reverse DNS does not match and mail server will bounce the mail.
View 11 Replies
View Related
Sep 3, 2012
I purchased a RV180 router, and would like set the Firewall Access Rules as below
- Action: Always Allow
- Service: HTTP
- Source IP: Any
- Send to Local Server (DNAT IP): private ip (192.168.1.xx)
- Use Other WAN IP Address: Enable
- WAN Destination IP: one of public ip (different of the router WAN ip address)
- Action: Always Allow
- Service: FTP
- Source IP: Any
- Send to Local Server (DNAT IP): private ip (192.168.1.xx)
- Use Other WAN IP Address: Enable
- WAN Destination IP: one of public ip (different of the router WAN ip address)
The firewall access rules no problem within 1 hour after setting. I can access the http / ftp services by the WAN ip address. After several hours, I can't access the services.
I can set the one-to-one NAT rather than use the firewall access rules, but I would like block all other ports, and one-to-one NAT will forward all ports to the private ip address. Administrator > Logging > Firewall Logs , when I enable the settings, where can I get the log of the firewall?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 2, 2012
I have configured the access rules for RWW, RDP, HTTPS and FTP and enabled them. Cannot access the server remotely. I have configured single port forwards for all the services and that does not work either. What am I missing? I installed this new unit in place of and old WRT400N that worked fine except for needing to be rebooted frequently.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 22, 2012
I have found numerous posts discussing this but have yet to find a solution. I have an RV082 with firmware 2.0.0. 2.0.0.19-tm and I need a way to limit the incoming smtp traffic to just the spam filtering company.I have a port forwarding rule to forward WAN1 port 25 traffic to 192.168.1.10.I tried to add an access rule to deny all port 25 and then added one to allow WAN1 port 25 source <spam company> destination 192.168.1.10The RV082 log screen shows the traffic allowed but it does not work. If I uncheck the 'enable' box on the DENY port 25 rule email is still blocked. Only when I uncheck the 'enable' box on the ALLOW rule does email start flowing again.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Apr 8, 2012
I wanna block the Lan IP address(eg:192.168.2.106) to visit wan web, and allow it to lan.How can i set it in access rules?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 27, 2012
I have a SRP547W that I have configured the following way:
LAN 192.168.15.1/24 VLAN1
LAN 10.10.10.1/24 VLAN10
LAN 10.10.2.1/24 VLAN100
PPPOE ADSL
Software DMZ going to 10.10.10.x and another to 10.10.2.x - this is working OK
I now want to use the Advanced Firewall features to block all ports except those that I need as the software DMZ forwards everything. When I try to create the rules I get "the values are invalid" message no matter what I try.
I want to create explicit allow rules, followed by a deny all rule for each of the IP addresses used for the software DMZ
Have I got the Subnet Mask Correct for the Destination IP? Or should it be 255.255.255.0? It doesnt make a difference either way
Policy DetailsNameValueSource IP Address0.0.0.0Source Subnet Mask0.0.0.0Destination IP Address10.10.10.xDestination Subnet Mask255.255.255.254ProtocolAnySource PortAnyDestination Port443ActionPermitScheduleEverydayTimes24 Hours
View 6 Replies
View Related
Oct 13, 2011
I have a new (about 4 months old) RV042 V3 4.0.0.07 firmware that I am trying to use in fail over mode. I have a SOHO and I normally use cable Internet connection. It is quite fast (15 megabit), but not super reliable. I have added DSL (3.3 megabit) which is five nines (supposedly) but not so quick.
I have a Westell 7500 wireless DSL modem located in the basement, where the telephone lines enter the building. This gives me a wireless link to the second floor server room through a wireless router that connects to WAN 2 of the RV042. The cable modem is in the server room and connects directly to the WAN 1 of the RV042. The cable works, but when it goes down, the DSL link comes up but does not allow Internet traffic. The RV042 is set up as a Bridge and I have set up port forwarding to get the cable to work and used similar firewall commands to route the traffic if the router switched over. I suspect that the problem is in the port forwarding (port 80) or the firewall rules(which are pretty simple) because everything looks like it switches over, but it just doesn't work on WAN2.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 27, 2013
I have a Cisco RV215W and i want to create inbound rule (wan -> lan) with ip control.I ha created in "service management" a new service (rsync on 873 start port and and port) After i had created a new access rules :
[code]...
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 3, 2011
I am having some troubles finding information about how to configure firewall policies (rules, chains, etc.) via telnet on a RV016. The reason for that is that i keep getting some log entries "connection refused - policy violation" and "blocked" even with my firewall wide open (only allow rules on all interfaces, SPI and block wan request disabled, multicast and https enabled, etc.... ). Also, with these exact same rules, i can only connect via PPTP with the firewall disabled. The minute i tick the enable option the tunnel never gets to authentication phase. I then started reading OpenRG manual and many things are quite similar, but some other entries are missing from that manual (maybe some changes made by cisco?). I am trying to figure out some service ids, chains (e.g. the rv016 has some rules redirecting to chains 10, 100, 200 but i can not find them anywhere), and so on. I have only one rv016 and about 60 connections to it so i can not experiment that much without having the whole company on my neck with internet problems.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 6, 2012
Our firewall just died - it was a windows server 2003 rackmount running Microsoft ISA server. I'm shopping for a replacement, but would like to get an appliance rather than have to purchase a whole server, which just seems like overkill.
We had four network ports on the old box - one for internal, one for the cable modem, one for guest wifi, and one for the VPN (We have a dedicated Barracuda VPN appliance, so we won't be using the VPN functionality on whatever new router we purchase)
What we'd like to do is have a set of rules similar to what we had on the ISA server. We denied everything by default, and then for example: Allow outgoing HTTP, HTTPS, FTP access from guest wifi and internal network to the internetAllow access from the VPN subnet to certain ports on certain machines on the internal networkForward incoming access from the internet on port 443 to the VPN boxetc.
From reading the manual for the RV180, i could get a rough configuration going by putting internal, guest wifi and VPN on different VLANs, and disabling inter-VLAN routing for the guest wifi. However this doesn't get me the detailed control that I am used to - guest wifi and internal would be able to see the whole internet, and the vpn would be able to see anything on the internal network.
Does the RV180 can actually give you this level of control? What would be the most cost effective router from Cisco that could do this for me?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 15, 2012
RV220W - I'm trying to create a one-to-one NAT connection to a PC on my network. I have 5 static IP's assigned by my ISP. I've gone through the step of 'registering' each IP in turn on the WAN port, and pinging that IP from an external device until it starts to respond, then I set the WAN IP back to the one I want to use to manage the device.
I think what I want to do is simple. I simply want to NAT ALL traffic hitting my 2nd IP address, let's call it 24.15.120.73 (not the real value) to 192.168.1.10 internally. I want ALL ports both UDP and TCP to be forwarded. This Server is then going to be one end of a VPN tunnel going to another site, but I don't want to complicate things with that for now. So I can't even seem to get one-to-one NAT working! I created the one-to-one NAT on the Advanced tab of the firewall and created rules for all ports for UDP and TCP, but I can still never 'see' the internal server from the Internet. Also, the server will not get out to the Internet (can't hit Google, etc).
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 3, 2012
I have problem with RVS4000 fw 1.3.3.5. When you switch the status of IPS function (turn on or turn off), firewall rules don´t work from that moment until you restart the router!
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 28, 2012
can i set what websites I want to kid to have access to on a belkin N759 N+ router
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 2, 2012
what exactly is QuickVPN?Is it a IPSec VPN?Is it a PPTP?Is it a SSLVPN?can I resolve my local hostnames? That means, can I configure a lokal DNS Server?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 24, 2012
I am trying to setup and configure a VPN on the RV220W that uses IPSEC so I can use the Cisco VPN Client I use at work, I have gone through the user manual 11 or 12 times now but still cannot work it out. I cannot find where on the Rv200W iset up the phase 1 authentication username and password which will then lead me onto the phase 2 stage of asking for a username password to allow me access.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jul 3, 2012
Picked up a pair of RV220W's for a project I'm working on. I have several IP's available, 4 of which are assigned to/in use by a server behind the RV220W. All 4 of these IP's are static external IPs. How I can configure the RV220W so that requests to those 4 IP's get routed to the server.
Prior to purchasing this, I was under the impression what I was trying to do was called one-to-one NAT, but after reading the 'Help' document on the one-to-one NAT page, I don't think this is right. Emphasis added below: Cisco RV220W Wireless-N Network Security Firewall Help FirewallOne-to-One NATOne-to-one NAT is a way to make systems behind a firewall and configured with private IP addresses appear to have public IP addresses.One-to-One-NAT Rule TableThis table lists the list of available One-To-One NAT rules configured by the user. Private Range Begin: start ip address in private (LAN) ip addressPublic Range Begin: start ip address in the public ip address (WAN IP), Public IP Subnet Mask: The Subnet Mask of the public IPRange Length: Range length maps one to one private address to public address up to the given range.Service: This column shows service to be accepted by LAN Host.The actions that can be taken on One-to-One-NAT rules are:(Check Box At First Column Header): Selects all the entries in the table.Add: Opens the One-To-One NAT Configuration page, to add a new entry. Edit: Opens the One-To-One NAT Configuration page, to edit the selected entry.Delete: Deletes the selected entries.
So according to their documentation, the server in question would need to be configured with a private IP. Unfortunately, one of the applications I use is licensed via IP address and my understanding is that I cannot use the software with private/non-routable IP addresses.
Is the RV220W capable of not only securing the line (firewall, access rules, content filtering, port trigering & forwarding etc) but also doing what I was hoping to do (keeping the external IP's on the server, and routing appropriately)?
View 9 Replies
View Related
May 15, 2012
I'm using a RV220W router, and recently got shifted to a dynamic IP solution.Now, I've got a no-ip.org address, but the update service seems to be on no-ip.com. So, I try to enter mydomain.no-ip.org OR mydomain.no-ip.com in the dynamic dns settings, under Host and Domain Name, but when saving the settings it says
'The hostname specified does not exist in this user account' ,which seems to indicate that it manages to login to the update service but gets a negative reply.Is it possible to use the RV220W with no-ip.org/com?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 12, 2012
We have 2 sites connected thru 2 RV220W routers via VPN and most things are working fine. I have noticed however, that any device that has a web interface, i.e. our Sharp Copier and our Freenas server, is inaccessible. The page tries to come up but then I get the Cisco "server is down" page generated by the RV220W.
I can pull up the web interface pages if I use a machine on the local LAN but not on any machine across the VPN. The only commonality I can think of is the RV220W blocking that traffic for some reason..
View 8 Replies
View Related
Sep 28, 2011
Cisco support write down manual (workaround), how to setup IPsec VPN connection on Mac OS 1.7?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 27, 2011
Is there anyway to associate a name to an IP in the RV220W? I am coming from a WRVS4400N v2. Folks are complaining that they can't connect, for example via Real VNC, via the PC name any longer. They have to use the IP address. In the past I put the names of the PCs in the WRVS4400N when I reserved IPs via MAC addresses (some call this assigning static IPs). There isn't any place in the RV220W to put the name. Even when I look at the DHCP list a lot of them show up as "unknown". I am sure this is a NETBIOS thing but I'd rather fix this in the router as I have always done in the past.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 22, 2011
i have a RV220W and absolutely nothings functional on this stupid Router, no NAT , no Port Forwarding and I cant access my Network from Outside. Any firmware link for downloading. This address works, its handling special webrequest.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 19, 2012
I set up a PPTP VPN with an RV220W recently. It was working flawlessly until a recent power outage and now users are getting the 807 error when attempting to connect. I have PPTP passthrough enabled and TCP/UDP 1723 open. As far as I can tell GRE 47 is open as well. Why it was working and is not working after a power outage?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 23, 2012
Having a strange problem that just started this week and got worse this evening. I have a RV220W that is feeding my network. The RV220W sits behind a broadband modem and acts as the DHCP for the network and those computers access the internet that way. Anyway, tonight started an issue where the the RV220W just disappears. Becomes unpingable. I recycle power, and within anywhere from 5 to 10 minutes, it's gone. No longer pingable. Even if I plug a latop directly into it.If I power cycle the RV220W it comes back and I can ping it and access it and its settings. 5 to 10 mins later, I again lose it. Nothing was done. Its been working fine for a few weeks. Had a similar outage last Tuesday, but a recycle of everything brought everything back into line. After I lose connection to it, the lights I expect to be lit remain lit.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 26, 2012
I am unable to make UPnP to work on the RV220W. I am forced to use port forwarding.
View 10 Replies
View Related
