I am having an odd issue on a couple of new 3750X switches.I am trying to configure VRF-lite and it is not recoginizing the command.Does that make any sense? I have goggled the syntax ans it should be right.
View 12 RepliesI want to confirm this is a licensing issue. On a 3750X with ipbase, I cannot create a vrf. So I would need the universal image, and that is a seperate license, correct?Is there a link that describes the difference bewteen ipbase and univeral images?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have 10.10.10.10 in 2 VRFs (lite) on 2 different VLANs What i would like to achieve:- if i connect to 172.16.7.125 in the global VRF then translate it to VRF1 10.10.10.10 destination address.- if i connect to 172.16.3.162 in the global VRF then translate it to VRF2 10.10.10.10 destination address IMHO the solution is quite simple:ip nat outside source static 10.10.10.10 172.16.7.125 vrf VRF1 ip nat outside source static 10.10.10.10 176.16.3.162 vrf VRF2 However the router thinks something else:
R1(config)# ip nat outside source static 10.10.10.10 172.16.7.125 vrf VRF1
R1(config)# ip nat outside source static 10.10.10.10 176.16.3.162 vrf VRF2% 10.10.10.10 already mapped (172.16.7.125 -> 10.10.10.10)
IMHO this configuration should be valid. The global VRF has two IPs (172.16.7.125 and 172.16.3.162) while the 2 other VRFs work happily with the two identical 10.10.10.10 destinations as they should. The two translations should be easily distinguished as these are from two different VRFs.Either i am missing something or it is a problem in IOS.
IOS is 12.4(25f)
HW is 3845
We are trying to test multicast between VRFs configured on Nexus 7Ks. Two Nexus 7Ks are configured for VPC. Multicast Server is in one VRF where as Receiver is in another VRF. The two VRFs are connected to each other via Checkpoint Firewall (Active/Active cluster in unicast mode). All routes have been established and connectivity tested between multicast server and receiver using ICMP.Using, windows mcast.exe multicast stream is generated from server (in one VRF) intended to be received by receiver (in second VRF). Every time, only one multicast packet is received by the receiver and rest all packets are being dropped. Server and Receiver are VirtualMachines configured on VMWaresame chassis which is connected to two Nexus 5Ks (VPC configured).
View 1 Replies View RelatedI want to create following setup, wanted to know that how is this achievable
3 VRF on nexus 7k and all VRFs connected to each other in following manner through virtual firewall contexts
N7K-VRF1----FW-CONTEXT1----N7K-VRF2---FW-CONTEXT2-----N7KVRF3
| | |
SERVER1 SERVER2 SERVER3
Now i want that SERVER1 should be able to speak to SERVER2 and SERVER3 and i want to exchange routes betwene VRFs through OSPF.
My management has tasked me to give them a high level overview of the different switching we can choose for our new building.
This is what I know so far.4 Closets, each closet has 450 ports,One MDF room that is will contain one UCS Chassis and a Nimble iSCSI SAN.
I am working on the spreadsheet and it looks like this (Not totally filled):
2960s3560x3750x45064510Approx cost (Each, 48PORT, POE+, 10G uplink, Dual PS, IP BASE)
6K7K8K45K75KMax Capacity192432432192384Backplane speed206464520520ProLeast ExpensiveStackable to 9Stackable to 9ProDual PSDual PSDual PSDual PSDual PSProLayer 3 opt
Layer 3 optDual SupsDual SupsConExpensiveExpensiveConNo Dual PSConLayer 2 OnlyCannot stack more than 4
For the MDF I would like to use 2 Nexus 5548's with FEX's, and the layer 3 daughter board. For the IDF's I was thinking of two 4010's.
i cant find any difference in these two devices when i am trying to compare throughput.I need upgrade our new POP and there will be around 4900 MAC adresses in VLAN 150 and 130 MAC adresses in vlan 200.Uplink is 1 gig routed internet connection and there is 14 downlinks to separate villages.i found a few differences for eg stack interface on 3750x but i dont need it.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a stack of 2 x 3750X switches these are running 12.2(55)SE5. I needed to add some static IP routes and found that the ‘ip routing’ command is not supported. I came across a document that stated “On switches running the LAN base feature, static routing on VLANs is supported only with Cisco IOS Release 12.2(58)SE and later.” So I have upgraded to 12.2(58)SE2, but ‘ip routing’ is still not a valid command.
The release notes state:“On the Cisco Catalyst 3560-X and 3750-X Series, it adds support for 16 static IPv4 routes in the LAN Base image.”
I have read other posts that talk about running the ‘sdm prefer routing’ command which I have done, but I am still unable to add any routes or run the ‘ip routing’ command.
I have an 1811 with several subnets connected to it.I recently installed a 3750x plant and want to bring my interior routing back to it.
All the routing is handled by the 1811 via secondary interfaces on vlan1?
I have 192 ports, and subnets show up on almost all of them. None of the ports are assigned to any specific vlans. Most ports have several subnets on them.
What is the best approach to getting the 3750x to handle the routing?
my company pay a switch 3750 X. WS-C3750X-24T-E. It uses IP services basically but I failed to configure InterVLAN routing. why interVLAN routing doesn't work on my switch?
View 10 Replies View RelatedI am setting up a vm environment for a customer in my lab off site. I have two stacked 3750-x switches, a san, and threes UCS c220 M3S servers for hosts. I am trying to separate the lan traffic, san iscsi traffic, and san management traffic using vlans. The problem is i'm unable to communicate cross vlan with my current config, which I have attached to this post. The only noteworthy things in my conifg is that the ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.83.6 is referring to a switch stack they have on site, that I will connect this stack to using the first two trunk ports on each switch, that I do not have here in the lab. I don't want to cause any confusion in why I have things set a certain way.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWhy does my 3750x-12s switch say it's not supported in CNA??? I upgraded to CNA 5.7.1 and still says unsupported. This device is supported or I'm just missing something.I use CNA heavily to manage our MANY vlans.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a query regarding attached Network Design
PC---2960---3750(One Routed Port and All Switched Port)------------------------ 3750(One Routed Port and All Switched Port)-----2960------Internet
I have many Vlans on left side of image , Right Side of Image is having internet connection via Modem, and local connectivity between VLAN works fine but Other Vlans Except Vlan1 is able to Access Internet.Note that 3750X did not have NAT Feature ,How should I able to get Internet on Other Vlans (10,20)
scenario A
A site .
PBX --->
Data ---> other brand router ----> 3750X ---> wan
[Code]....
How to know whether QoS work on the 3750X or not ? Is it correct about the config in scenario A ?
I have a one question. I am using Cat3750x-48 switch. Suddenly it has occurred following high CPU log message in Cat3750x-48 switch.
%SYS-1-CPURISINGTHRESHOLD: Threshold: Total CPU Utilization(Total/Intr): 62%/0%, Top 3 processes(Pid/Util): 162/40%, 156/10%, 74/1%
What is meaning of PID 162 ?
There seems to be a lot of conflicting information on what can and can't stack together in the 3750X range.
I know that LAN Base can only stack with other LAN Base switches.
Can IP Base stack with IP services in 3750X? I have also heard that the 15.x.x IOS restricts mixed feature set stacks?
I know that Cisco recommends that all switches in a stack have the same IOS and feature set but having all IP Services in a stack can get too expensive.
I'm trying to review a QoS setup, and I'd like to make sure I fully understand the current setup before I change anything. I'm seeing output drops on two different queue-thresholds, but not sure how packets are making it to one of the queues.
Switch Version
CORE#show ver
Cisco IOS Software, C3750E Software (C3750E-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.0(2)SE, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
System image file is "flash:/c3750e-universalk9-mz.150-2.SE/c3750e-universalk9-mz.150-2.SE.bin"
cisco WS-C3750X-24 (PowerPC405) processor (revision A0) with 262144K bytes of memory.
Switch Ports Model SW Version(code)
I can find queue4-threshold3 in the mappings, but how are packets getting mapped to queue2-threshold1? The priority queue is disabled for this interface, so I'm not sure how this queue is dropping packets, according to the maps nothing is mapped to 02-01.
I am building a switch stack using 4 48 port 3750X switches that will also have the power stacked. If I install a single 715W power supply in each switch will the stack support 802.3af accross all 48 ports on each switch? My calculations are 48 ports x 15.4W which gives me almost 740W needed which is over hte 715W power supply. I was reading somewhere were it mentioned that in a powerstack additional power can be drawn from the stack. I know this will not work if you are trying to support power on all switches accross all ports but would it if say 2 of the 4 switches are needing to provide PoE accross all 48 ports? If I say we can only use 24 ports per switch for PoE that drops the power need down to 370W which I believe should work. Just trying to get a better understanding of PoE consumption. Would the best solution be to just add a second power supply to each switch?
View 8 Replies View RelatedI have a switch which is rebooting it self, we bought it a year back,its a new switch, i did not find any error on sh ver after rebooting. I am using OP manager, i did not receive any alerts. I have done all diagnostic test, all are passed, i did not find any problem..
View 2 Replies View Relatedwe are replacing network equipment at one of our sites. The network will have 12, 3750X switches(6 stacks) - one stack will be the core. A 1002 will be the WAN router to the Main campus. The 1002 will connect to the core via 2 ethernet cables. I'm debating whether to use L3 or L2 between the router and Core. I've heard that routing is more efficient if L3 is used and also I will be able to create an L3 etherchannel between the 1002 and Core switch. See the attached doc.
View 6 Replies View RelatedThis 3750X stack (3 members) has some 100% cpu spikes. Is this bad enough to start tracking down the cause(s) or is this somewhat typical and not a reason for concern? I just took this reading. How can you detemine when the 100% and 80% spikes occurred?
2222233333333332222222222444442222222223333322222222222222
7777733333333338888888888000007777777770000077777888887777
100
[Code].....
I have two WS-C3750-48PS-S switches and I need to add two more. The new part number I am looking at is WS-C3750X-48P-S will these all stack together ?
View 2 Replies View RelatedThis is my scenario. I have my IP as 172.16.1.1 (aaaa.bbbb.cccc.dddd) which has full internet access. Now when i am not available in the office, i noticed some one assigning my IP in to his workstation and gaining full internet access. How do i restrict such things? i.e. even if some one assigning my IP on the network, they shouldnt access LAN or WAN.I tried 'arp 172.16.1.1 aaaa.bbbb.cccc.dddd arpa' configuring on my L3 Cisco 3750X switch assuming i can acheive, but that did not work.
View 8 Replies View RelatedIf the 3560 or 3750 "X" series support GRE.I am pretty certain the older 3750-E does not support GRE (both in hardware and software)Was hoping the new super duper X series do. If not, it could get expensive
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have been looking to find out the list of features that the IP Base IOS has for the 3750X series switch. What would be ideal is a comparable list but essentially I need to know which of the LAN Base/IP Base/IP Services has SSH functionality.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI recently created a stack using (2) 3750x switches. I have three vlans on the stack (1,105,241) Vlan 105 is configured on 6509 core switches with multicasting and are connected to the stack via gigabit fiber. It is working well with clients on the Master or SW1, however clients on SW2 do not participate in multicasting Any client pc that is connected to SW2 vlan 105 does not show up in the "sh ip igmp snooping group" command. I can statically assign a client on SW2 to the mcast groups but but they fail to register on their own. I can take the cable connection from SW2 and plug it into an SW1 Vlan 105 port and it immediately becomes a member of the groups. I can then connect it back to the SW2 port and it disappears from the group membership. IGMP and PIM are configured with the defaults.
View 3 Replies View RelatedThe 3750-12S-S comes with IP based IOS. I know it is possible to upgrade the IOS on a 3750X-48P-L from LAN based to IP based IOS. However, can the IOS on the 12-S be downgraded to the LAN based IOS?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI recently upgraded my network to have two 3750x core, one interface on the cisco is connecting to a Netgear switch via a fiber converter. I am keep getting the vlan flapping error message in my log as below.
View 2 Replies View RelatedFull feature set for IP Base with the 3750x.I just wanted to verify that I could create a routed port, turn ip routing on, and create static routes as well as a default route. From what I can find, there shouldn't be a problem with this on the IP Base Feature Set, I just wanted to verify. Or any link for the Features of IP Base on the 3750x.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a 3750G and bought a new 3750X. It possible to stack these two together?
View 5 Replies View RelatedWe currently have 7 Cisco 3524-XL switches (10-12+ yrs old) which are 10/100. We purchased a handful of Cisco 3750X switches to replace them going with the whole stackwise and redundant power supplies. Our current configuration on the old 3524 switches is that they have hardset all the ports on them to 100MB/FULL since devices would auto-neg to 100/Half. Since we're going from 10/100 to 10/100/1000 switches, I want things to auto-neg as I have heard in the past and experienced that things work better when it auto-neg to gigabit. My upper management is afraid since the old switches wouldn't auto-neg correctly that we should hard set all the ports on the new switches, which would be a nightmare since some ports would be hard set to 100/FULL others to 1000/FULL, etc.. We've tested just about all of our devices at auto with the switches and they've all auto-neg to the correct speed. In short, is Auto-Negotiation the way to go with the newer switches or is it still better practice to hard set your ports?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am trying to get a 1811 to update routes on a 3750x. My static routes are being redistributed to the switch fine, however my connected networks are not My router has Vlan with several subnets attached.
interface Vlan1
description $ETH-SW-LAUNCH$$INTF-INFO-FE 2$$ES_LAN$$FW_INSIDE$
ip address xxx.xx.xx7.185 255.255.255.0 secondary
ip address 172.90.0.185 255.255.255.0 secondary
ip address 172.99.0.1 255.255.255.0 secondary
ip address 10.170.10.254 255.255.255.0 secondary
[code]....
A host on the xxx.xx.xx6.0 network cannot ping a host on the 10.10.44.0 network. All ports on the switch and the router are in vlan1
When I config BGP on my 3750X Switch, it show error as below:
protocol not in this image
should I need to upgrade the IOS or Where I can found a supported image (support BGP)