nyone know if "vpc-orphan-port suspend" works if i put on N2k interface. not the fex link. example i have fex 101 and i put on eth 101/1/10 will it suspend the port on N2K connected to secondary N5K when peer link is down?
View 2 Replies
we have two nexus 7k connected via vPC peer. We have edge switch connected to the core using HSRP via vPC.Now we have 1 orphan port connected to each Nexus (WLC).The problem is i cant seem to connect / ping the WLC (only 1 of them) that is connected to the orphan port and i think it is probably due to the packet arriving at the secondary HSRP and traversing through peer-link and dropping the packet.
HSRP address on Core: 10.10.10.1
vlan 10 - N7k1 - 10.10.10.2
Vlan 10 - N7k2 - 10.10.10.3
Edge Sw - 10.10.10.10 - Vlan 10
[code].....
Now what is the best practise for HSRP with vPC for orphan ports ? The problem is i can only ping 1 wlc from a machine. on doing a traceroute i find that the packets seems reach N7k1 and reach wlc that is connected to its own port but not to the WLC that is connected to N7k2 due to the packet travesing through peer-link and dropping at the peer-link.Now what is the best practise to sort this out and reach both WLC at the same time ? Do i move the WLC 2 to N7k1 ?
I have been tasked to replace the existing Cat 6500 and 3750 switches by Nexus 7000 and Nexus 2000.I was told initially my boss plans to get 2 x Nexus 7000 and then eventually blow up to 4 x Nexus 7000s.For Nexus, is there a list of tasks / points that i need to consider for building the initial design?
Can i just link the Nexus 7000 like the following?
N7k-A ========= N7k-B
| |
lots of N2ks lots of N2ks
if vPC is supported between a single 2232PP FEX and two 7000 switches running 6.0(1)? I have been researching this for an implementation I am doing for a client and was able to determine it was not supported with earlier versions of 5.0 when the FEX is connected via vPC as I described above, but I can't find anything related to version 6.0(1). I have done this for other clients with 5000 and 2000 switches, but I don't have too much experience with 7000 switches.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have a big doubt. Can I connect a LAN switch (i.e. 2960, 3560 or 3750) to a couple of Nexus 2000 FEX (i.e 2232P or 2248TP) and have a Port-Channel or vPC with STP active and several VLANs through this Port-Channel? Or Can I only connect servers to these N2K FEX?
View 3 Replies View RelatedIf the latest release of NX-OS 6.1.2 supports dual homing a Nexus 2000 to a pair of Nexus 7000s (F2 Module)? The document does state something about support for vPC+ but is not really clear about it.
View 4 Replies View Relatedis it possible to connect one Cisco Nexus 2000 fabric extender to two Cisco Nexus 5000 and use one link on the first side and two links on the other side?
View 3 Replies View Relatedcurrently nexus 2000 and nexus 7000 does not support dual connection. you can not connect to 1 nexus 2000 to 2 nexus 7000 chasis. But for the nexus 5000, Nexus 7000s? 5000s and 7000s run same software.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am designing a network for my client where I have to implement a 10 Gig end to end connectivity. The major factor of concern from my management is about scalability (space to include more 10Gig servers as the nodes grow up). I have suggested Cisco 5596UP with 2232 PP as this gives ample amount of 10Gig ports. The setup has to be implemented across 2 different datacenters located 40 Kms apart, connected with 10Gig DC Interconnect.
I understand that Cisco Nexus 2232 is a Layer 2 Only switch and would need to communicate with parent 5K switch very frequently. Is it necessary to have the 2K and 5K pair in the same datacenter or in proximity? Is it possible to have the SFP uplinks connected to the DC interconnect? Because we have two datacenters located 40 Kms apart and having 1*Layer 3 - 5K switch at DC A with Layer 2 - 2K nexus Switch at DC B will be cost effective. We do require more 10Gig ports and not much requirement on Layer 3 usage. What are the type of communication that would be much frequent between 2K and 5K?
Does the LACP will be supported on Nexus 2000 host interfaces when parent switch is Nexus 7000?
View 5 Replies View RelatedAny info on how to configure dynamic-pinning, instead of static pinning on a Nexus 2224 connected to a 7009?Can't seem to find anything on CCO!
View 9 Replies View RelatedI have several SGE2000 in production and every night I save the current configuration to a tftf server... from time to time I get the following error: [code] Can't open TFTP client.At this time, the only way to be able to save the config again is rebooting the switch, but this is not a solution I am comfort.
View 5 Replies View RelatedFor a week now, one of my Cisco 3945 routers displays, from time to time, the following message in its log:
2012-07-16T14:12:43.852017+00:00 cb00-r103 220: [syslog@9 s_sn="59"]: Jul 16 16:12:42 MEST: %SYS-2-INTSCHED: 'may_suspend' at level 4 -Process= "OSPF-100 Hello", ipl= 4, pid= 320
2012-07-16T14:12:43.852017+00:00 cb00-r103 221: [syslog@9 s_sn="60"]: -Traceback= 15CB073z 9081B7z 2851571z 11B7582z 11C275Ez 11C2906z 11C03E3z 1B907B5z 1B9064Cz 1BA5737z 172047Fz 47FFDCz 4D2EEDFz 4D2ED71z 4D2EA2Bz 4D30097z
2012-07-16T15:06:11.686817+00:00 cb00-r103 222: [syslog@9 s_sn="61"]: Jul 16 17:06:10 MEST: %SYS-2-INTSCHED: 'may_suspend' at level 4 -Process= "OSPF-100 Hello", ipl= 4, pid= 320
2012-07-16T15:06:11.686817+00:00 cb00-r103 223: [syslog@9 s_sn="62"]: -Traceback= 15CB073z 9081B7z 2851571z 11B7582z 11C275Ez 11C2906z 11C03E3z 1B907B5z 1B9064Cz 1BA5737z 172047Fz 47FFDCz 4D2EEDFz 4D2ED71z 4D2EA2Bz 4D30097z
[code]....
It never happened before and the configuration did not change. The only thing that happened, the WAN connection (point-to-point to a Cisco 3845) went down and the router rebooted while the WAN was down. When the WAN came up again, everything went fine, until about an hour later and the first occurrence of this mentioned log.This 3945 does establish an IPSec tunnel with its peer (the 3845) and all the traffic, including OSPF, is going through the tunnel.
When I read Nexus 5K install guide , I found the follow :The Cisco Nexus 5596UP switch has the following features: # •48 fixed 1- and 10-Gigabit Ethernet server connection ports on the back of the switch AND The 48 fixed ports support 8-, 4-, 2-, or 1-Gbps Fibre Channel transceivers and 1- or 10-Gigabit Ethernet transceivers. Does these is a conflict ?The 48 fixed port on this switch support only 1- and 10-Gigabit Ethernet or 8-, 4-, 2-, or 1-Gbps Fibre Channel and 1- or 10-Gigabit simultaneously ？
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe are running nexus 5018 in our DC.What is the difference betwen "channel-group 214 mode active" and " channel-group 216" Any difference?.. because i have problem with this config we are going build a server config?
We have problem with porth channel down.
5K# sh int po71
port-channel71 is down (No operational members)
vPC Status: Down, vPC number: 71 [packets forwarded via vPC peer-link]
I have one cisco Nexus 7000 with version 6.1(2).I created 3 VDC
ADMINCOREsecurity
I have configured 1 - 45 ports for Core and 46 - 48 ports for Security.Now I am not using the VDC Security and I tried to move the assigned ports 46 - 48 from Security to ADMIN.Switch accepted the command .But the ports are not visible on ADMIN VDC.Now it is not showing on Security VDC also. I need this ports in ADMIN VDC
I'm setting up a montitor session on a NEXUS 7K as below.we are receiving in 150M of data and 0 data going out port 9/25.but port 4/24 shows 300M to the span port?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am trying to create a port channel between HP servers (4 nic) and two nexus 2k. The server side its a single team with 803.2ad fault taulerence and on the nexus side it have created two port channel (port channel 1 for nexus 2k1 and port channel 2 for nexus 2k2) and made them ACTIVE (channel group mode active)
But when i add a another server on different ports and port channel them the same way as the above server on nexus 2k1 and nexus 2k2, the first server stops pinging. so i have to sht down the first port channel and reopen them - then it works, however it says NO NETWORK ACCESS on the servers (running windows 2008). the only way is to reboot the server i cant be doing this on a production network.
How to remove the config from an ethernet port on a Nexus 5548 - send it back to factory default.
View 1 Replies View RelatedSo I took a laptop with wireshark and plugged it into a nexus 5000 port that is configured as a trunk with 3 vlans allowed on it. The laptop was seeing all kinds of traffic on the wire, most of it was not involving my laptop.
For example: Server A VLAN 10= 10.10.10.1 Server B VLAN 20= 10.20.20.1 and wireshark laptop is plugged into a trunk port which is allowing those vlan's. The vlan's are routable.
10.10.10.3 is seeing the entire conversation when 10.10.10.1 backs up 10.20.20.1 even though it has no reason to see it. It is as if the trunk is spanning traffic to the laptop port. No span is setup however. It's really weird. This is not just broadcast traffic, but actual tcp taffic between Server A and B. Why would a trunk port see traffic between 2 other servers talking to each other on the vlan.
Trunk port configuration below:
Interface Ethernet 141/1/3
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan 10, 20
I am having hard time in understanding the hardware port channel resource concept in Nexus 5Ks. Which scenario is considered as a hardware port channel and which is not. According to Cisco documentation, 5548UP switch with layer 3 daughter card only supports 8 hardware port channels, does this mean we can connect only 8 dual homed Fex to those 5Ks.Will a dual homed fex consumes a hardware port channel?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am a bit confused by the output of 'show run' and 'show run switch-profile' that pertains to a port-channel interface configured in a switch-profile. My main gaol is to find out how can I add/remove the allowed vlans the port-channel (configured as trunk) carries. The setup is like this. I have 2 N5k in vPC domain and Etherner1/11 on both switches is configured as trunk vPC that connects to a core switch. When I issue ‘show run’ for the port-channel and physical interface I get the following output. [code] From above it seems the switch-profile configuration is missing the 'switchport trunk allowed vlan' in the port-channel interface. If want I to remove vlan 30 from the allowed vlan, should I go under the switch-profile mode and remove vlan 30 from the allowed list even though the switch-profile configuration seems to be missing this.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have a couple of IBM blade chassis with Nexus 4000I 10G blade switch in it. Four 10G ports from each Nexus 4000I switch are bundled into a port channel and connected to Nexus 7K. On the 4k end, one port in the port channel is doing down and coming up as an idividual port. After few minutes it is going down again and coming up as a port-channel member port. It is happening quite offen. [code]
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to change a vlan on a port-channel but I am getting this error when I apply the change:" error: command is not mutually exclusive",I have done this in the past but I cannot remember exactly what I should type to apply the change.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a dual-homed fabric (Nexus 2248 dual attached to two Nexus 5020's via vPC). On this Nexus 2248 is a server that has a four port LACP etherchannel. The ports do not appear to be load balancing correctly. The output below shows the four ports in use and it clearly shows port e138/1/10 as getting the most use. When I use the "show port-channel load-balance forwarding-path..." command on either of the vPC switches for various source and destination IP's that use this link, it shows them correctly load-balancing across the four ports. But we do not see this when looking at stats on both the server side and the switch side.
dc5020-3g# sh int e138/1/10,e138/1/12,e138/1/14,e138/1/16 | i seconds
30 seconds input rate 552 bits/sec, 69 bytes/sec, 0 packets/sec
30 seconds output rate 130120 bits/sec, 16265 bytes/sec, 161 packets/sec
Load-Interval #2: 5 minute (300 seconds)
30 seconds input rate 40 bits/sec, 5 bytes/sec, 0 packets/sec
[code]....
**************** Config info below. This is a vPC pair and the port configs are identical on both switches so I'm only showing the configs for one switch to keep it simple.
dc5020-3g# sh port-channel load-balance
Port Channel Load-Balancing Configuration:
System: source-dest-ip
Port Channel Load-Balancing Addresses Used Per-Protocol:
Non-IP: source-dest-mac
IP: source-dest-ip source-dest-mac
[code]....
I'm running a couple of nexus 7000 to aggregate a building full of 3750Xs.In the past few weeks I have noticed that the vlans I added to the port-profile never got propagated.So I looked at port-profile sync information and here is what comes up: [code] Why the commands are getting cached?
View 3 Replies View RelatedNexus 5500 support auto negotiation on 1gig sfp port? There is an end device that only support auto negotiation and cannot be manually set speed/duplex.
View 0 Replies View RelatedI am trying to limit the incoming and outgoing traffic on a l2 port to 8mbps for a ip subnet within the nexus 7000. The port is connected to my ISP router which has a bandwidth of 20mbps.Policing won't work on a l2 Port and shaping cannot be applied on a port level. url...I have been reading thru the qos guide for nexus release v6 and have problems understanding the different queues.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI've Nexus 7010 switch installed in my DC. I've conncected Cisco router to one of the Ports. On the same port I'm getting following error message and hence, unable to form EIGRP neighborship.
DR-CORE-SW-S01-NEXUS7K %MODULE-2-MOD_SOMEPORTS_FAILED:
Module 1 (serial: JAF*******NGK) reported failure on ports 1/2-1/2 (Ethernet) due
to R2D2 : Speed patch failed - no frames transmitted in device 143 (error 0xc8f0
1273)
I'm in the middle of a Nexus 5000 project and recognized today while configuring port-channels, that some of the interface numbers are reserved for internal use.
Is it possible to change or configure which port-channel interface numbers are allocated for internal use by NX-OS?
Unfortunatly I wasn't able to find a solution for this issue in the offical Nexus documentation, the search function of this forum or Google. If I did miss something or didn't look careful enough at the Nexus docs, I'm also happy with RTFM (... fine manual) responses and links to the info :-)
Additional info:
Nexus5k(config)# interface port-channel 128 ignored port-channel128: internally used, configuration not allowed
Port-Channels 111, 113, 115, 119, 121, 200, 211, 222 were created manually, but 127 - 129 were not.
Nexus5k# show port-channel usage
Total 11 port-channel numbers used
============================================
Used : 111 , 113 , 115 , 119 , 121 , 127 - 129 , 200 , 211 , 222
Unused: 1 - 110 , 112 , 114 , 116 - 118 , 120 , 122 - 126 , 130 - 199
201 - 210 , 212 - 221 , 223 - 4096
[Code]......
Basically I am trying to use Wireshark to do a packet capture on a Nexus 5010. I want to do a monitor session on on the switch so I can capture from a source port to a destination port on the same switch. I can configure the source port but when I go to configure the destination port I get "ERROR: Eth102/1/4: Configuration not allowed on fex interface". I have tried to reconfigure this port as a switchport but "switchport mode access" command does not take. I don't want to make any changes to any other ports but this one.
View 1 Replies View RelatedHere is an example of what each switch logs when a server drops offline. Sample logs taken between 5:32am and 5:35am on Feb 20. This particular one was having problems all weekend. Switch #1 encountered over 2000 interface resets. The corresponding VPC port on Switch #2 only had 13 resets.
NEXUS SWITCH #1
2012 Feb 20 05:32:09 q91-sw01-5010 %ETH_PORT_CHANNEL-5-FOP_CHANGED: port-channel10: first operational port changed
from Ethernet1/10 to none
2012 Feb 20 05:32:09 q91-sw01-5010 %ETH_PORT_CHANNEL-5-PORT_DOWN: port-channel10: Ethernet1/10 is down
2012 Feb 20 05:32:09 q91-sw01-5010 %ETH_PORT_CHANNEL-5-PORT_DOWN: port-channel10: port-channel10 is down
2012 Feb 20 05:32:09 q91-sw01-5010 %ETHPORT-5-IF_DOWN_PORT_CHANNEL_MEMBERS_DOWN: Interface port-channel10 is down (
No operational members)
[code].....
I have a router on which I would like to create a port channel that spans two different Nexus 2248TP switches, and then create a couple subinterfaces on the router's po interface. I've done this successfully on my primary router, but the config doesn't seem to work on the backup router. The primary is running IOS 15, while the backup is running 12.4.25d advanced IP. I do see the trunk come up from the switch side, and my router subinterfaces and po interface show up, however I'm not able to get anywhere from the router. It's not even able to reach other hosts on the same network. As soon as I remove the port channel config and use the physical interface and assign the same address used on the port channel interface, everything works as expected and I have connectivity.
interface Port-channel21
no ip address
hold-queue 150 in
!
interface Port-channel21.248
encapsulation dot1Q 248 native
ip address 100.100.100.1 255.255.255.0
[URL]
