Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 2248 / Port-Channels On N2K Not Load Balancing?

Sep 5, 2012

I have a dual-homed fabric (Nexus 2248 dual attached to two Nexus 5020's via vPC).  On this Nexus 2248 is a server that has a four port LACP etherchannel.  The ports do not appear to be load balancing correctly.  The output below shows the four ports in use and it clearly shows port e138/1/10 as getting the most use.  When I use the "show port-channel load-balance forwarding-path..." command on either of the vPC switches for various source and destination IP's that use this link, it shows them correctly load-balancing across the four ports.  But we do not see this when looking at stats on both the server side and the switch side. 
 
dc5020-3g# sh int e138/1/10,e138/1/12,e138/1/14,e138/1/16 | i seconds
  30 seconds input rate 552 bits/sec, 69 bytes/sec, 0 packets/sec
  30 seconds output rate 130120 bits/sec, 16265 bytes/sec, 161 packets/sec
  Load-Interval #2: 5 minute (300 seconds)
  30 seconds input rate 40 bits/sec, 5 bytes/sec, 0 packets/sec

[code]....
 
**************** Config info below.  This is a vPC pair and the port configs are identical on both switches so I'm only showing the configs for one switch to keep it simple.
 
dc5020-3g# sh port-channel load-balance
 Port Channel Load-Balancing Configuration:
System: source-dest-ip
 Port Channel Load-Balancing Addresses Used Per-Protocol:
Non-IP: source-dest-mac
IP: source-dest-ip source-dest-mac

[code]....

View 3 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 7K Is Not Load Balancing

Aug 5, 2012

We have Nexus 7K on production. 7K chasis is not load balancing with non-cisco devices with etherchannel or LACP..I have tried all load balancing algorithms but in vain. [code]

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 7K Load Balancing On LACP

Jul 26, 2012

I have conneccted a server with LACP on Nexus extender. I am starting different file copy from diffferent sources to this server, it does not load balance.
 
source addresse: 192.168.30.3  /  192.168.30.1
destination: 192.168.30.2

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 5548UP Switches - Load Balancing?

Mar 10, 2013

The best option for load balancing between 2 X Cisco nexus 5548UP switches located at one site and connecting to 2 X Cisco nexus 5548UP switches located at another site.
 
The sites are connected via a 1GB fibre connection. I am unable to use GLBP until GLBP is supported in further software releases.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - Load Balancing Nexus Switches

Jan 24, 2013

I am trying to understand what load balancing method is used on a port channel on a Nexus switch . I have a server connected by a VPC to two Nexus switches. The nexus switches are only acting as layer 2 switches. I have a 6509 connected via a upstream link that does all of the routing for my VLANS. If  have a server connected to the Nexus switches and it talks to a server on my 6509 what load balancing happens on the Nexus going across VPC 27 which is a layer 2 trunk going up to my 6509. Is it done on layer 2 or layer 3 flows?
 
My Nexus shows the default load balancing configurations
 
Port Channel Load-Balancing Configuration:System: source-dest-ip
Port Channel Load-Balancing Addresses Used Per-Protocol:Non-IP: source-dest-macIP: source-dest-ip source-dest-mac

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: C2960 - Port Channel Load Balancing?

Apr 15, 2013

I have an inquiry about a configuration I deploy in a C2960 switch. I have configured a ether channel with 8 ports, the load balanced method is source mac address. The bundling protocol is LACP.
 
I have found the ether channel is not balanced as I expect. One of the eight interfaces is congested.
 
Code...

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750X Port Channel Load Balancing Protocols

Jan 15, 2012

What I am attempting to achieve is to aggregate trunk ports out of a VMware server into a single logical connection to give as much bandwidth as possible, the switches are 3750X and are three stacked together with the server connections spread across the stack. What I am not sure about is if two port channel load balance protocols can happy co-exist on the switch, by default the switch is using MAC address load balancing and Vmware wants to use IP Source load balancing. As other trunks and channels exist on the switch I don't want to make a change that will affect the other live connections if changing this is a global setting and not local on the channel.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 5596 / 2248 TP - Compatibility With SFP-10G-SR

Jan 31, 2012

I am looking to see if Nexus 5596UP & Nexus 2248TP GE compatible with SFP-10G-SR? The reason is because a consultant was hired on to "design" the network layout and has decided to purchase Cisco SFP+ Copper Twinax Cables which have a 10M limit. A small handful of the Data Center racks are 10-15M away... just out of reach of the Twinax. I would prefer NOT to move the LAN row so that it is more centered in the room. Can I use the SFP-10G-SR to connect the 2 switches (5596 & 2248) together? This SFP has a 26M reach on standard 10gig fiber, the small cost increase per connection is of no concern.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 5548UP To 2248 Design

Aug 10, 2012

This past networkers I was at the Cisco booth discussing how the 2248 can connect to the 5548 and have server connectivity.  It was told to me that now, as of a fairly recent NX-OS release, you can have the 2248 going dual-homed to both 5548 via VPC and then have a server connected to both 2248 and be in active-active mode.  Is this correct?
 
When we first deployed our 5548 and 2248 we had to put the 2248 in a straight pin mode, where it only had connections to one 5548 and then the server would dual connect to the 2248's and be in active-active mode.  I was told that this changed with an NX-OS release however documentation still seems to be fragmented on what exactly is the case. 

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 2248 Maximum VPC Members?

Apr 10, 2013

I have a pair of 2248 Fex's where I'm currently terminating several VPC's to the servers, each with one port per Fex. Is it possible to run a VPC to a server with 4 ports, i.e 2 ports per Fex? I saw some discussions indicating it wasn't possible on a 2148 Fex, but would be on the 2248. The ports will just a dot1q trunks

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 2248 / N 5596 - AA Version Mismatch

Jan 27, 2013

I have a pair of 5596 running in a vPC with Nexus 2248 connected to each N5596.  When I do the command "show fex" I get the following output on the 2nd 5596

Number    Description      State            Model            Serial    
------------------------------------------------------------------------
101         FEX101   AA Version Mismatch   N2K-C2248TP-E-1GE   SSI16390705
102         FEX102   AA Version Mismatch   N2K-C2248TP-E-1GE   SSI163704AD
122         FEX122                Online    N2K-C2232PP-10GE   SSI16370195
 
I'm running version 5.1(3)N1(1) on both of the 5K's. I have looked through all the configuration and I am not understanding why I am getting this error.  I have tried to look it up on [URL], but not having a ton of luck. 

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 881-K9 Load Balancing And Static NAT

Dec 3, 2012

i'm going to configure a 881-k9 with:

- Ethernet 0/0 LAN (Private Address)
- Ethernet 0/1 ISP1 (Public Address 1)
- Ethernet 0/2 ISP2 (Public Address 2)
  
find some configuration example to:

- have load balancing over the two ISP connection, used to connect to Internet

- configure Static NAT to bind:
- TCP 443
- TCP 1723on ISP1 e ISP2 Interface to a LAN Address (SBS2008 Server)

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 7609 Portchannel Load-Balancing

Oct 23, 2012

I'm trying to make MGSCP solution. I have Cisco 7609 with following configuration:

Mod Ports Card Type                              Model             
--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------
  3    8  CEF720 8 port 10GE with DFC            WS-X6708-10GE     
  5    5  Route Switch Processor 720 10GE (Activ RSP720-3CXL-10GE  
  7   24  CEF720 24 port 1000mb SFP              WS-X6724-SFP      
  8   24  CEF720 24 port 1000mb SFP              WS-X6724-SFP      
  9   48  CEF720 48 port 10/100/1000mb Ethernet  WS-X6748-GE-TX.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4900M Etherchannel Load Balancing

Dec 18, 2012

We have to cisco WS-C4900M with Cisco IOS Software, Catalyst 4500 L3 Switch Software (cat4500e-IPBASE-M), Version 12.2(53)SG5, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1).We have four gigabit link connected between those two switches.We have create a LACP port channel with those four ports on both switches. Ether-channel is up and running and defined with a load-balancing method of src-dst-ip.But when we test the load-balancing, it's not using the src-dst-ip rule with the XOR: [code]

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Possible Load Balancing On 2821 Router?

Apr 15, 2012

I have a 2821 Router, with a VWIC2-2MFT card in it, with two T1s going into that card.  The two T1s are a bundled MPLS line.
 
I then have a cable modem connection going into the gigabit Ethernet GE 0/1 port on the router.
 
Right now, the cable modem provides a backup connection in case the T1s go down.
 
What I was wondering is if there was a way to 'combine' the bandwidth from the two T1s with the cable modem?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560 - Redundant Lan With Load Balancing

Sep 25, 2012

How to set up redundant LAN Ring topology with load balancing for a cisco catalyst 3560 platform.

View 10 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: CSS 11501 - Configuring CSS Content / Load Balancing

Feb 3, 2012

I would like configure a CSS content, that uses the sorry service principal in an advanced way.

I am familiar with the primary Sorry Server command and see that the CSS would send all connections to the named service that is configured as the primary Sorry Server.

What I would like to do is to configure the CSS, so that once it’s decided it’s in a “sorry” state (all the services that are configured with “add service” are down) that it load balances to a different set of services.

To explain what I’ve been trying to do in the form of configuration on the CSS, I’ve pasted some pretend config below.

Connections come into IP address 1.1.1.1, which normally get load balanced between  9.1.1.1, 9.1.1.2 and 9.1.1.3.

If 9.1.1.1, 9.1.1.2 and 9.1.1.3 are all down, the sorry service is used and the CSS starts passing traffic to 1.1.2.1, which I want it to load balance between  9.1.2.1, 9.1.2.2 and 9.1.2.3.

The order that I have applied the config, is different to the below, as I set out to configure in this order: secondary services, secondary content, sorry service, primary services, primary content.

The order of the config below is different, because I wanted it in the order that the traffic flows and the CSS won’t take the config in that order!

The wall I have ran into, is that when I try to create the service I have named “Sorry Service”, I get the following error:

%% Service IP Address conflicts with a local I/F, VIP, mg mt route.

[Code] .....

View 0 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Static Load Balancing On 3650-X IP Base?

Nov 22, 2011

Does 3650-X IP Base support Static Load Balancing or i should upgrade to ip service SW ?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4500X EtherChannel Symmetric Load Balancing

May 8, 2013

I have probem with symmetric load balancig, in case when both ends of ether channel are on the sam switch (we are using VLAN translation).We need to create L2 port channel with both ends on same switch (Cisco WS-C4500X-24X-ES), for example:Po1 – Gi0/1, Gi0/3 (one end of port channel )Po2 – Gi0/2, Gi0/4 (other end of port channel)On ports in Po2 we will configure VLAN mapping.My question is what is the best ether-channel load-balancing scheme with wich we can accomplish full symmetry in both directions? For example, if traffic in one direction goes through Gi0/1 (member of Po1), in other direction also must go through Gi0/1. This is required because we need to connect four appliances for DPI (they are full L2 transparent) and traffic through each appliance need to be symmetric.
 
I can set-up src-ip, dst-ip, src-dst-ip etc. load balancing, but, actually I need src-ip on Po1 and dst-ip on Po2. Is there any way to set up different load balancing mechanism for different ether channel on same switch (4500X).

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 Will Load-balancing Work As Intended

Sep 27, 2012

If the load balancing is set to src-dst-ip, will a layer 2 switch forward based on that information? Particularly talking about a 6500, with trunk interfaces, since those packets never go to the layer 3 engine, will the load-balancing work as intended?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 / Default Route Load Balancing?

Nov 29, 2012

Right now I have 2 default routes load balancing 100MB internet links.  This is on my 2 6509's.
 
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.47.2.1 (FWSM)
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.47.2.250 (5510)
 
Is there anyway to make the first default route take more of the traffic, like 60/40 or 70/30?Any program that I could use to see top users going through the FWSM?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 1921 Load Balancing Over 3 ADSL Lines

Aug 22, 2012

I have the requirement to provide a Cisco Router with 3 x ADSL lines (768k) to increase the internet speed.PPP multilink is not supported from the ISP.
 
Is it possbile to distribute the traffic between this three ADSL lines?How can I configure this?
 
I have the following hardware configuration:
 
1 x  CISCO1921-SEC/K9
2 x  EHWIC-VA-DSL-B
 
The third ADSL line is connected over an ADSL modem at one fixed Router Gigabit interface.

View 0 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 1941 Auto Failover With Load Balancing?

Jan 27, 2013

One of our customer has  3 ISP Line, out of which Two are Broadband and One is Leased Line.   All 3 ISP interfaces are Etherent.
 
Now, they want Auto Failover with Load balancing among these 3 ISP lines.
 
Can we do same implementation in Cisco 1941 Router??  What licenses required in router for same?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - Etherchannel Load Balancing Between Two Switches

Mar 5, 2012

Is it possible to use two different load balancing methods at each end of a port-channel between two switches?
 
We have a Cisco 6509 at one end of the port-channel and a Cisco blade switch 3020 at the other end.  Right now, we are using "src-dst-ip" at both end of the port-channel.  We would like to change this.  That is, we would like the #3020 switch to use "src-dst-ip" while the 6509 switch should use the "src-dst-port". 
  
Why we want to do this, the reason is that we have FWSMs on the 6509.  I've read that by configuring "src-dst-port" on the 6509, one can get a better performance of traffic going through the FWSM.  However, the issue is that the 3020 switch does not support "src-dst-port". 

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Asa 5520 Load Balancing Based Upon Http Or Https

Mar 5, 2012

I have a customer who wants his new ASA-5520 to load balance out-going traffic between 2 ISPs, fairly normal request. Now here's the twist. He wants to separate traffic based upon the protocol used, http to one ISP, https to the other.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 7009 - VPC Cluster To VSS Using Port-Channels

Nov 6, 2012

We have a vPC cluster of two Nexus 7009 that needs to be connected with a VSS cluster of two Catalyst 6509s. The VSS has been working fine for a while and the vPC cluster is new equipment.
 
Attached there is a detailed diagram of the connections; the VSS cluster connects the interfaces Ten1/2/8 and Ten 2/2/8 using the PortChannel 28 going to the the vPC cluster to the interfaces Eth 4/18 of each switch.
 
Both the vPC and the VSS are well configured; last night we tried to brought up the connection between the two clusters but only the first interface comes up within the etherchannel; the secondary one did not come up and shows (not receiving LACP packets).
 
We know Layer 1 is fine because if we remove the interface from the EtherChannel it does come up; but causes some STP loop and bring the network down; thus the solution is to form a EtherChannel.
 
At the VSS Clúster we see LACP packets being sent with sh lacp counters but we DO NOT see LACP packets being received in the interface of the secondary Nexus.
 
Right now, this is not possible to troubleshoot since it is a production enviroment; so I'm looking for problems with the configuration or recommendations to follow in order to apply them tomorrow night during a new maintenance window.
 
These are the configurations:
 
#######vPC cluster of Nexus 7009######
 
--N7K-1--
 
interface port-channel418
 
  description Uplink 20 GE hacia VSS
 
  switchport
 
  switchport mode trunk(code)

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4500E - Changing Default Etherchannel Load Balancing Algorithm

Mar 25, 2012

Will there be some pause in traffic on formed ether channel interfaces (4500E switch), when i will change the default ether channel load balancing method to src-dst-port (or any other non-default method)?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Created Load Balancing Between Two Catalyst 3550 On Couple Of Vlans

Feb 24, 2012

I am testing on lab equipment (2 Catalyst 3550 and 1 Catalyst 3560) HSRP version 1 and 2.I successfully created a load balancing between the two Catalyst 3550 on a couple of vlans (11 and 12) on ver 1
 
now, just adding the command "standby xx version 2" my hosts on the 2 vlans are completely unable to ping the virtual IP def. gw on debugging i checked that msgs are exchangedthe two cat 3550 are seeing each other on HSRP (active / standby roles)the real ip addresses are pingable rebooted the swiches (just as a last resort try)deleted arp chache on hostsremoved the auth on hsrp  all of this no effect.
 
i also tried to modify the priority on the cat 3560 (before he was on both vlans in standby) to make it the active one and with the same config it worked flawlessly.
 
My only idea is that there is a bug on CATs 3550 (IOS: c3550-ipservicesk9-mz.122-55.SE4.bin) [code]

View 11 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Vlan Flapping Between Port-channels

Mar 10, 2012

We have a pair Cisco 6509 switch in which 2 * 48 Port 1G line cards and 1 * 16 Port 10G line Card, FWSM and Sup 720 are installed.We have Cisco UCS and HP Blade servers.Cisco UCS servers are connected to Cisco 6509 switch using Fabric Interconnect, and HP Servers are directly connected to core switches.Recently the team made many changes in the network. Upgraded the IOS in Cisco 6509 switch, Configured Port profiling , MAC Pinning , HBA Cards to UCS / Nexus 1000V Infrastructure. After this change they lost the connectivity to UCS and HP Serers. Every tower is checking at their end.
 
The Network Team has reverted back the core switch with old IOS , but still the problem persisit.I could only see the following error log in the core switch. There are two port-channels one between core 1 and core 2. The other is between core switch and FWSM module. [code]

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 Mac Address Learnt From Different Port Channels

Dec 26, 2012

We are facing issue with mac address learnt from different port-channels, Connectivity is like 6500 as core running VSS and 4500 access switches are connected to Core and WLC is also connected to Core.WLC to 6500 PO 60 , 4500 to 6500 PO 32.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 - Adding Port Channels In Existing STP Topology

Apr 3, 2013

current topology is build from 4 6500 switches connected in a ring topology. Using Port channel (2x 10Gbit) links to connect left side top and bottom 6500's (DC1), 10 G bit link to connect right side 6500's (DC2) In between a 1 G bit link is used to connect top 6500's (DC1-DC2) and the same for bottom 6500's (DC1-DC2). 

Path costs are 5 and 6 so the T5/4 from bottom right is blocking. Bandwidth demands are increasing, so thinking about adding extra 1 G bit links to the existing ones and create ether channels. Path costs here are 4 and 5, so T5/4 from bottom right is still blocking, but when the bottom 2 G bit port-channel is loosing one 1 G bit link the path costs of both directions become equal. So I am worried that STP will not re converge and leave me with a congested 1 G bit link. I cannot test this setup in a lab, are there any options for STP to re-converge here?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Stack Mac Persistent Timer Lacp Port Channels C3750

Sep 27, 2012

I am having an issue on a Cisco 3750 stack where when the stack master is rebooted, all my lacp port-channels drop and then come back up again. After doing some investigation It seems that it is happening because of lacp using the stack master mac-address as part of the system-id, so when the stack master reboots, the stack mac changes. I see that there is the command: stack-mac persistent timer 0

There is this warning about using this command:
 
When you configure this feature, a warning message displays the consequences of your configuration. You should use this feature cautiously. Using the old master MAC address elsewhere in the domain could result in lost traffic.
 
My question are:
 
Are there any other consequences to using this command (apart from moving the switch/mac to another location in the network)It mentions 'If the entire switch stack reloads, it acquires the MAC address of the master as the stack MAC address' Is this still the case if you have the stack-mac persistent timer to 0? Does using channel-group mode on for the port-channels still use the same mechanism of having a system-id? (Will the channels flap using 'mode on' when rebooting the stack master.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 1841 Router Load Balancing With WIC 2T And Ethernet Port

Jun 9, 2013

Can we do the load balancing with WIC - 1T card as ISP - 1 and Ethernet card as ISP - 2 and other ethernet card as my LAN Network.
 
WIC - 1T - connected to ISP Ethernet card - Connected to Secondary ISP Second Ethernet card - connected to LAN Connection.
 
I would like to have load-balancing & fail-over between this two connections.

View 3 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved